28
BUREAU OF ELECTIONS RICHARD H. AUSTIN BUILDING 1ST FLOOR 430 W. ALLEGAN LANSING, MICHIGAN 48918 www.Michigan.gov/sos (517) 373-2540 May 23, 2014 REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr. Candidate for U.S. Representative in Congress, 13 th District Two appeals were filed concerning the Wayne County Clerk’s official determination that Congressman John Conyers, Jr.’s nominating petition contained an insufficient number of valid signatures. The first appeal was filed by Rev. Horace Sheffield and Richard Jones on May 14, 2014; the second appeal was filed by Congressman Conyers on May 16, 2014. NUMBER OF VALID SIGNATURES REQUIRED: 1,000. TOTAL FILING: 2,000 signatures, excluding excess of 27 signatures over maximum number authorized. MCL 168.544f. CONCLUSION: The Secretary of State finds that Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett correctly determined that Congressman Conyers’ failure to submit a minimum of 1,000 valid signatures renders him ineligible to appear on the August 5, 2014 primary election ballot. CONYERS APPEAL: Congressman Conyers seeks “a complete review and reversal of the signatures improperly discarded by the Wayne County Clerk[,]” based on his assessment that the circulator registration requirement of MCL 168.544c(3) is unconstitutional. Under that provision, (3) At the time of circulation, the circulator of a petition shall be a registered elector of this state. At the time of executing the certificate of circulator, the circulator shall be registered in the city or township indicated in the certificate of circulator on the petition. Secretary of State Review. The Bureau of Elections completed a thorough review of the entire Conyers petition filing as permitted by law, which included: A full face review of every petition sheet; A voter registration status check and verification on all petition signers; A complete review and verification of all petition signatures rejected by Wayne County; and A complete review and verification of the registration status of every petition circulator. Based on this review, the final totals listed in this report differ from the findings of Wayne County, primarily due to the discovery of an additional four circulators who were registered to 2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 1 of 28 Pg ID 996

REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

B URE A U O F E LE CT ION S R IC HA RD H . A US T IN B U IL D I NG 1S T F LO OR 43 0 W . A L LE GA N L A NS IN G , M IC H IG A N 4 8 91 8

www. M i ch i ga n .g o v / so s ( 51 7 ) 3 7 3 - 2 5 4 0

May 23, 2014

REVIEW OF APPEALS

OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION

Congressman John Conyers, Jr.

Candidate for U.S. Representative in Congress, 13th

District

Two appeals were filed concerning the Wayne County Clerk’s official determination that

Congressman John Conyers, Jr.’s nominating petition contained an insufficient number of valid

signatures. The first appeal was filed by Rev. Horace Sheffield and Richard Jones on May 14,

2014; the second appeal was filed by Congressman Conyers on May 16, 2014.

NUMBER OF VALID SIGNATURES REQUIRED: 1,000.

TOTAL FILING: 2,000 signatures, excluding excess of 27 signatures over maximum number

authorized. MCL 168.544f.

CONCLUSION: The Secretary of State finds that Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett correctly

determined that Congressman Conyers’ failure to submit a minimum of 1,000 valid signatures

renders him ineligible to appear on the August 5, 2014 primary election ballot.

CONYERS APPEAL: Congressman Conyers seeks “a complete review and reversal of the

signatures improperly discarded by the Wayne County Clerk[,]” based on his assessment that the

circulator registration requirement of MCL 168.544c(3) is unconstitutional. Under that provision,

(3) At the time of circulation, the circulator of a petition shall be a registered elector

of this state. At the time of executing the certificate of circulator, the circulator shall

be registered in the city or township indicated in the certificate of circulator on the

petition. …

Secretary of State Review. The Bureau of Elections completed a thorough review of the entire

Conyers petition filing as permitted by law, which included:

A full face review of every petition sheet;

A voter registration status check and verification on all petition signers;

A complete review and verification of all petition signatures rejected by Wayne County;

and

A complete review and verification of the registration status of every petition circulator.

Based on this review, the final totals listed in this report differ from the findings of Wayne

County, primarily due to the discovery of an additional four circulators who were registered to

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 1 of 28 Pg ID 996

Page 2: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2

vote at the time of circulation, but not in the city or township indicated in the Certificate of

Circulator (See Section II below).

Pending litigation. In addition to filing an administrative appeal with the Secretary of State,

Conyers filed suit against the Secretary and others in the federal District Court for the Eastern

District of Michigan challenging the constitutionality of MCL 168.544c(3). Moore v. Johnson,

USDC-ED No. 2:14-cv-11903.

Summary. As of this writing, while Conyers’ constitutional claims remain pending before the

District Court, the Secretary of State must enforce the circulator registration requirement as

written. As a result:

1. All signatures gathered by circulators who were registered to vote at the time of

circulation in the city or township indicated in the Certificate of Circulator are valid,

unless discounted for other reasons.

2. All signatures gathered by circulators who were registered to vote at the time of

circulation, but not in the city or township indicated in the Certificate of Circulator, are

invalid.

3. All signatures gathered by circulators who were not registered to vote at the time of

circulation are invalid.

Introduction. The Michigan Election Law is designed to protect the purity of the ballot access

process. The laws governing this activity place affirmative duties on petition circulators. As

evidenced over the past two election cycles, when campaigns fail to comply with the law by

executing basic principles of petition circulation, they create their own “ballot access crisis”

when their failures are discovered by or brought to the attention of election officials. In this

instance, consultant Steve Hood freely admitted that he failed to ensure that the petition

circulators he hired to work on Conyers’ campaign were registered to vote.1

Sections II and III below are prime examples of the failure to follow the basics, something that

thousands of campaigns routinely do each election cycle.

I. All signatures gathered by circulators who were registered to vote at the time of

circulation in the city or township indicated in the Certificate of Circulator are valid,

unless discounted for other reasons.2 Thus, the Secretary of State has counted all otherwise

valid signatures gathered by the following circulators:

Yvette McElroy Anderson Jacinta McCarver

Maurice Barrett Vernando Miree

Berline Brown Anthony Moore

Ulanda Caldwell Edith Turner

Florence Chambers Brenda L. Ward

Monica Conyers Marlita Washington

1 See Attachment 1, “Detroit consultant says he didn’t check voter status of Conyers’ petition circulators,” Detroit

News, May 14, 2014. 2 Other defects that may render a signature invalid include an incorrect or incomplete address, a signer who is not

registered to vote in the 13th

Congressional district, incorrect or incomplete date entry, etc.

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 2 of 28 Pg ID 997

Page 3: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

3

Julian Douglas Mamie Weathersby

Dameon Fentress Kenneth Wimberly

Patrick Jackson Frank D. Woods Jr.

Sanqustine Latham

In addition, the Secretary of State has counted all otherwise valid signatures collected by Davena

Hogan, whose voter registration record was erroneously updated earlier this year and

subsequently corrected after Wayne County completed its canvass of Conyers’ nominating

petition. However, all signatures gathered by Jamal Gooden and Simone Twiddy are invalid

despite the fact that they are both registered to vote in the jurisdiction provided in the Certificate

of Circulator, due to other defects on the petition.3

In all, this category yields 455 valid signatures for Congressman Conyers.

II. All signatures gathered by circulators who were registered to vote at the time of

circulation, but not in the city or township indicated in the Certificate of Circulator, are

invalid. Under current law, circulators are required to correctly identify and disclose the city or

township in which they are registered to vote. MCL 168.544c(3) (“At the time of executing the

certificate of circulator, the circulator shall be registered in the city or township indicated in the

certificate of circulator on the petition.”).

Legislative history of the disclosure requirement. This second sentence of MCL 168.544c(3)

is a disclosure requirement and was enacted by Public Act 329 of 1990, effective December 21,

1990, in reaction to Messerli v Board of State Canvassers,4 an unpublished opinion of the

Michigan Court of Appeals issued June 21, 1990, which held that despite a circulator’s failure to

list the precise city or township in which he was registered to vote, the petition was in

“substantial compliance” with MCL 168.544c. Within six months, Public Act 329 of 1990 was

enacted, vitiating the argument that a circulator who writes the wrong jurisdiction of registration

has substantially complied with the Michigan Election Law.

Significance of the disclosure requirement. The circulator’s city or township of registration is

significant, not “superfluous” as Conyers contends,5 in that it enables election officials to contact

a circulator if questions arise regarding the validity or genuineness of the signatures appearing on

the petition. This is particularly important given the relatively short interval of time between the

filing deadline and the deadline to certify the list of candidates who are eligible to appear on the

ballot, as well as the 7-day deadline for filing challenges against a candidate’s nominating

petition. For example, there are 1,134 individuals who share the name “James Smith” and are

registered to vote in Michigan.6 It would be virtually impossible to ascertain which “James

Smith” executed a particular petition as circulator if the requirement to disclose the correct

jurisdiction of registration was unenforceable.

3 Gooden failed to execute the Certificate of Circulator on one sheet and failed to provide his complete street

address on another. Twiddy wrote the names of two different jurisdictions in the Certificate of Circulator. 4 See Attachment 2, Messerli v Board of State Canvassers, Court of Appeals Dkt No 129867 (unpublished opinion).

The Supreme Court declined to hear the case on appeal. Messerli v Board of State Canvassers, lv den, 435 Mich.

858 (1990). 5 Conyers Appeal to the Secretary of State, p. 8.

6 Other common names include Michael Smith (1,130 registered statewide), Robert Smith (1,024), David Smith

(974), James Johnson (838), Robert Johnson (836), Michael Johnson (809), Mary Smith (755), David Johnson

(680), and William Smith (669). For example, using the name of one of Conyers’ circulators, there are 128

individuals named Anthony Moore who are registered to vote in the State of Michigan, 30 of them are registered in

the City of Detroit alone.

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 3 of 28 Pg ID 998

Page 4: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

4

The requirement that the circulator must disclose his or her jurisdiction of registration is akin to

the requirements imposed on a notary public, who must register with the Secretary of State by

providing his or her residence and business addresses and other identifying information.7 One

reason why a notary public must disclose an address is so that the Secretary of State can

promptly contact the notary in the event that a complaint arises or an investigation is necessary.8

Circulators who did not comply with the disclosure requirement. The following petition

circulators were registered to vote at the time of circulating Conyers’ petition, but in a different

jurisdiction than the one they identified in the Certificate of Circulator:

Name

City / Township

indicated in

Certificate of

Circulator

City / Township where

Registered to Vote at time

of circulation

Cassandra Johnson Wayne Detroit

Tyshay Jones Highland Park Detroit

Quinisha Peterson Wayne Pontiac

Charlotte Richardson Farmington Farmington Hills

Chinita Terry Detroit Oak Park

Circulator Chinita Terry. One circulator in particular, Chinita Terry, filed a declaration that

her address for voter registration purposes was “mistakenly changed” by the Secretary of State

when she attempted to provide an alternate mailing address because she had been the victim of

mail theft,9 rendering all of the signatures she collected invalid. However, Terry’s Qualified

Voter File (QVF) record indicates that she has changed her address at various Secretary of State

branch offices 8 times since June 2003, including 7 times in the past 7 years.10

Chinita Terry

Registration Date

City / Township in

which Registered to

Vote

Voting History

2002 Detroit 2002 August state primary

2002 November state general

June 10, 2003 West Bloomfield None

February 20, 2007 Detroit None

December 11, 2007 West Bloomfield None

January 22, 2008 Detroit

2008 August state primary

2008 November state general

2009 May city election

2009 August city primary

2009 November city general

2010 August state primary

2010 November state general

2012 February presidential primary

7 MCL 55.275(1).

8 MCL 55.295, 299, 300.

9 Conyers Appeal to the Secretary of State, Exhibit 13, Declaration of Chinita Terry.

10 See Attachment 3, Change History for Chinita Ann Terry.

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 4 of 28 Pg ID 999

Page 5: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

5

Registration Date

City / Township in

which Registered to

Vote

Voting History

June 4, 2012 Oak Park 2012 August state primary

2012 November state general

April 26, 2013 Detroit 2013 November city general

February 25, 2014 Oak Park None

May 14, 2014 Detroit N/A

Three items merit note with respect to Terry’s address history. First, when Terry changed her

address at the Secretary of State branch office on February 25, 2014, she signed a voter

registration application11

that included the following certification statement:

I am a citizen of the United States. I am a resident of the State of Michigan and will

be at least a 30 day resident of my city or township by election day. I will be 18

years of age by election day. I authorize cancellation of any previous registration.

The information I have provided is true to the best of my knowledge under penalty of

perjury. If I have provided false information, I may be subject to a fine or

imprisonment or both under Federal or State laws.

(Emphasis added). Although Terry claims that “[w]hen I asked the Secretary of State to change

my mailing address, I never intended for my voter registration address to change[,]”12

in the

declaration that Conyers appended to his appeal to the Secretary of State, Terry’s declaration is

plainly contradicted by the voter registration application she executed on February 25, 2014. In

fact, according to Secretary of State branch office documents, the very first time Terry attempted

to add a mailing address to her record was on May 14, 2014.

Second, in accordance with MCL 168.499(3), the Oak Park City Clerk’s office mailed voter

identification cards to Terry on two separate occasions, on or about March 3, 2014 and April 15,

2014,13

neither of which were returned undelivered to the Clerk’s office. Thus, Terry was on

notice that she was registered to vote in Oak Park. This is not the first time that Terry registered

to vote in Oak Park.

Third, at the August primary and November general elections held in 2012, Terry voted in Oak

Park, where she was then registered to vote.14

In sum, Terry is well aware of the process for

effectuating a change in address for voting purposes, having frequently availed herself of it on

numerous occasions. The Secretary of State therefore concludes that Terry knowingly registered

to vote in Oak Park and therefore could not claim to be registered at the Detroit address while

circulating Conyers’ petition.15

Conclusion. Applying current law with respect to circulators Johnson, Jones, Peterson,

Richardson, and Terry, all of whom are registered to vote yet failed to disclose the correct name

of the jurisdiction in which they are registered, each of the 661 signatures they gathered are

invalid.

11 See Attachment 4, Affidavit of Stephanie Sumner, p. 3.

12 Conyers Appeal to the Secretary of State, Exhibit 13, Declaration of Chinita Terry.

13 See Attachment 4, Affidavit of Stephanie Sumner, ¶7-8.

14 See Attachment 4, Affidavit of Stephanie Sumner, p. 5.

15 Terry collected 316 otherwise valid signatures and 153 invalid signatures, for a total of 469 signatures.

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 5 of 28 Pg ID 1000

Page 6: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

6

III. All signatures gathered by circulators who were not registered to vote at the time of

circulation are invalid. Current Michigan law mandates that all circulators of nominating

petitions must be registered to vote in the State of Michigan. MCL 168.544c(3). A circulator’s

failure to register is a fatal defect that renders all signatures appearing on a petition he or she

circulated invalid. Thus, all signatures collected by Alex Canty, Daniel Pennington, and Tiara

Willis-Pittman have been discounted, due to the circulator’s registration status. Two of these

circulators, Pennington and Willis-Pittman, allegedly were registered to vote by Chinita Terry in

December, 2013.

Circulator Daniel Pennington. Pennington claims to have “registered as a voter with the

Michigan Secretary of State’s office, located at 11533 East Twelve Mile Road, Warren, MI

48093” on December 13, 2013, the exact same day he also claims to have “filled out a voter

registration form, which I delivered to Chinita Terry.”16

Further, the Secretary of State record of

his December 19, 2013 visit to the branch office indicates that he did not register to vote in

conjunction with his request for a duplicate state personal identification card (not a duplicate

driver’s license as indicated in his “Affidavit of Fact”). Although he claims to have “received a

receipt from the Secretary of State confirming the fact of my registration, which I subsequently

misplaced[,]” Secretary of State records confirm that he did not attempt to register during his

December 19, 2013 visit to the Warren branch office and therefore could not possibly have been

issued a receipt. See MCL 168.500a(2), 168.509w(1)(b) (requiring Secretary of State branch

office employees to issue a receipt as proof of application).

Instead, a photocopy of Pennington’s voter registration application (dated December 13, 2013)

was delivered to the Detroit City Clerk for the first time on April 28, 201417

but was improperly

recorded as received on December 13, 2013 – a clerical error that was promptly corrected.

Before the error was discovered, Pennington asked for and received a receipt from the Detroit

City Clerk that bore the erroneous December date. However, this “receipt” does not change the

date of Pennington’s registration and therefore does not make the signatures he collected valid.

Further details regarding the April 28, 2014 transaction are provided in the Affidavits of Gina

Avery and Alicia Brown.18

Circulator Tiara Willis-Pittman. Like Pennington, Willis-Pittman claims to have “filled out a

voter registration application on December 13, 2013 and handed it to a woman doing voter

registration.”19

In an earlier written statement, Willis-Pittman identifies the person who received

her application as Chinita Terry.20

Terry claims that she received the applications of Pennington,

Willis-Pittman, and other unidentified individuals on December 13, 2013 at “a voter registration

fair,” and to have delivered the forms to the Detroit City Clerk on December 16, 2013.21

Yet the

16 Conyers Appeal to the Secretary of State, Exhibit 3.

17 Under MCL 168.509x(a), “An application for registration is considered to be received on or before the close of

registration, if 1 of the following requirements is met: (a) An application is received at a department of state office, a

designated voter registration agency, or the office of a county, city, or township clerk on or before the close of

registration.” Thus, Pennington’s application is considered received on April 28, 2014, despite the earlier date of

execution. 18

Attachment 5, Affidavit of Gina Avery and Attachment 6, Affidvit of Alicia Brown. 19

Conyers Appeal to the Secretary of State, Exhibit 4, Declaration of Tiara Willis-Pittman dated May 12, 2014. 20

Conyers Appeal to the Secretary of State, Exhibit 4, Affidavit of Fact executed by Tiara Willis-Pittman on April

30, 2014. 21

Conyers Appeal to the Secretary of State, Exhibit 2, Declaration of Chinita Terry. Neither Pennington, Willis-

Pittman, or Terry describe the location of the voter registration fair or identify the sponsoring organization(s),

making it impossible to verify their account. Furthermore, the disposition of the other voter registration application

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 6 of 28 Pg ID 1001

Page 7: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

7

Detroit City Clerk’s office denies that it received Pennington and Willis-Pittman’s applications

until photocopies of these two forms were delivered on April 28, 2014, having confirmed that

“[a]fter a thorough search there is no documentation in [the Detroit City Clerk’s] office to

confirm that an original voter registration document was received by our office for either Tiara

Willis-Pittman or Daniel Pennington on December 13, 2013, or any other date prior to April 28,

2014.”22

Coupled with Terry’s statements regarding her own registration status, her account

regarding the alleged delivery of Pennington and Willis-Pittman’s applications to the Detroit

City Clerk on December 16, 2013 are of dubious value.

Circulator Alex Canty. Canty was not registered to vote anywhere in Michigan at the time he

circulated Congressman Conyers’ nominating petition.

Conclusion. In sum, the Secretary of State finds that Pennington and Willis-Pittman were

registered to vote on April 28, 2014, the date their applications were first delivered to the Detroit

City Clerk, and that contrary to MCL 168.544c(3), they were not registered to vote at the time of

circulation. As a result, all 478 signatures gathered by Canty, Pennington, and Willis-Pittman

are invalid.

DISPOSITION OF CONYERS APPEAL: Based on the foregoing, the Secretary of State

finds that Congressman Conyers submitted a total of 455 valid signatures.

The following chart is provided to explain the status of the petition should Judge Leitman’s order

result in circulators described in Sections II and III of this report be included as valid.

If the petition sheets circulated by individuals who were registered to vote at the time of

circulation but failed to disclose the correct jurisdiction of registration are included, 398

valid signatures are added to the total number of valid signatures submitted by Conyers.

This yields 853 valid signatures (455 + 398).

If the petition sheets circulated by individuals who were not registered to vote at the time

of circulation are included, 367 valid signatures are added to the total number of valid

signatures submitted by Conyers. This yields 1,220 signatures (455 + 398 + 367).

See Chart, p. 8.

forms Terry claims to have delivered to the Detroit City Clerk on December 16, 2013 is not known, as she has not

provided any identifying information regarding these applicants, again making it impossible to confirm whether

Terry delivered any voter registration application forms to the Detroit City Clerk on that date. 22

Attachment 6, Affidavit of Gina Avery, ¶2.

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 7 of 28 Pg ID 1002

Page 8: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

8

Category Finding Number of Valid

Signatures

Number of Invalid

Signatures – Signer

not registered to

vote or not

registered in 13th

Congressional

District

Number of

Invalid

Signatures –

other fatal

defects23

Subtotal

I. Circulators who were

registered to vote at the

time of circulation in

the city/township

indicated in Certificate

of Circulator

Signatures in

this category

are valid unless

discounted for

other reasons

455 294 112 861

II. Circulators who were

registered to vote at the

time of circulation, but

not in the city/township

indicated in Certificate

of Circulator

Signatures in

this category

are invalid

0 *

*(398 if allowed) 205 58 661

SUBTOTAL if this category is included 853 499 170 1,552

III. Circulators who

were not registered to

vote at the time of

circulation

Signatures in

this category

are invalid

0 *

*(367 if allowed) 87 24 478

TOTAL

1,220

(This includes total

signatures in

Categories I, II and

III)

586 194 2,000

SHEFFIELD APPEAL: The Secretary of State declines to address Sheffield’s appeal, as he is

not “a person feeling aggrieved” possessing appeal rights within the meaning of MCL

168.552(6). The determination by the Wayne County Clerk was favorable to Sheffield. As a

result, he was not aggrieved by the clerk’s decision. Kocenda v. Archdiocese of Detroit, 204

Mich App 659, 666, 516 NW2d 132 (1994).

Nonetheless, Sheffield’s appeal asks the Secretary of State to discount signatures appearing on

sheets that were previously invalidated by the Wayne County Clerk due to the circulators’ failure

to comply with the voter registration requirement of MCL 168.554c(3), for the additional reason

that these circulators failed to provide their true address, misrepresented the fact that they were

registered to vote, or both, in violation of MCL 168.544c(11)(b) (“An individual shall not …

make a false statement in a certificate on a petition.”). When filing his challenge to Conyers’

nominating petition, Sheffield did not ask the Wayne County Clerk to reject these signatures on

the additional grounds alleged here. Therefore, he cannot be aggrieved by the Clerk’s failure to

take this new argument into account when rendering her final determination.

23 See Footnote 1.

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 8 of 28 Pg ID 1003

Page 9: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 9 of 28 Pg ID 1004

Page 10: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 10 of 28 Pg ID 1005

Page 11: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 11 of 28 Pg ID 1006

Page 12: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 12 of 28 Pg ID 1007

Page 13: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 13 of 28 Pg ID 1008

Page 14: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 14 of 28 Pg ID 1009

Page 15: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 15 of 28 Pg ID 1010

Page 16: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 16 of 28 Pg ID 1011

Page 17: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 17 of 28 Pg ID 1012

Page 18: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 18 of 28 Pg ID 1013

Page 19: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 19 of 28 Pg ID 1014

Page 20: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 20 of 28 Pg ID 1015

Page 21: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 21 of 28 Pg ID 1016

Page 22: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 22 of 28 Pg ID 1017

Page 23: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 23 of 28 Pg ID 1018

Page 24: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 24 of 28 Pg ID 1019

Page 25: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 25 of 28 Pg ID 1020

Page 26: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 26 of 28 Pg ID 1021

Page 27: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 27 of 28 Pg ID 1022

Page 28: REVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY …media.mlive.com/news/detroit_impact/other/SOS Conyers.pdfREVIEW OF APPEALS OF WAYNE COUNTY CLERK’S DETERMINATION Congressman John Conyers, Jr

2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 05/23/14 Pg 28 of 28 Pg ID 1023