Upload
raja
View
227
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
1/21
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ULIPS VS MUTUA AT SBI MUTUAL FUNDS
• Presented by
P.Reddy Raja Reddy .
Roll no:13691E0083,
Under guaidence of
r.!"ulasi #ris"na. #
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
2/21
Review 2
DATA ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATIONS.
OBJECTIVES:
• To study the approach of investors towards mutual funds and ULIPS.
• To study the behavior of the investors whether they prefer mutual fund
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
3/21
response Frequency Percentage
Yes 19 62%
No 1 38%
total 50 100
1.o you !n"est !n #utual Funds$
N&'(P('&)&*N+
62% of t,e people !n"est !n mutual funds.
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
4/21
*pt!ons frequency percentages
F!-ed
depos!ts
11 5.83
Post off!ce
sc,emes
9 3/.5
(ecurr!ng
depos!ts! 16.66
&otal 2 100
23%
19%
8%
50%
Freque
2. f not t,en ,at ot,er opt!ons do you prefer to !n"est$
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
5/21
*pt!ons Frequency percentage
)d"ert!sements "" %
)gents 1" 2%
4em!nar # 1%
ors,op 9 18%
total 50 100
3.What is the mode of information that you use
for insurance companies?
a) Advertisement b) Agents c) Seminar
d) Workshops
22%
12%
#%
9%
50%
Freque!"
$%pected fre&uency' ()*!' 1".(
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
6/21
+hi s&uare' , -observede%pected-/ ' 1).0!
opt!ons Frequency o7ser"ed
e-pected
o7ser"ed
e-pected9
e-
)d"ert!sements "" 9.( 9)."(
)gents 1" .( ."(
4em!nar # (.( )."(
ors,op 9 .( 1"."(&otal 50 133
t de2ree of freedom3 df 45 '#.61(3 thus the calculated value is 2re
than the table value. 7ence3
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
7/21
22%
12%
#%
9%
50%
Freque!"
Advertisements
Agents
Seminar
Workshop
Total
nterpretat!on+ t means t,at all t,e modes of !nformat!on are not
t,e same. )d"ert!sement !s more popular
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
8/21
.n ,!c, sector do you prefer to !n"est your money$
*pt!ons Frequency Percentages
>o"ernment
sector
"# 5
Pr!"ate
sector
" 6
total 50 100
2#%
23%
50%
Freque!"
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
9/21
>o"ern
ment
sector
2/ 2 0.16
Pr!"atesector
" " ! 0.16
total 50 2 8 0.32
+hi s&uare' , -observede%pected-/ ' )." $%pected
t df 4153 the table value is .6!1 which are 2reater than the calculated v
7ence
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
10/21
5.,!c, factor do you cons!der 7efore
!n"est!ng !n mutual fund or ?@P4 t!c
*pt!ons frequency percentages
4afety of
pr!nc!pal
1! 28
@o r!s 1( 30
returns
1! 28
#atur!ty
per!od
! 8
&erms and
cond!t!ons
6
&otal 50 100
1$%
15%
1$%
$%3%
50%
reque!"
*pt!ons frequency *7ser"ede-pected *7ser"ed o7ser"e
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
11/21
*pt!ons frequency *7ser"ede-pected *7ser"ed
e-pected9
o7ser"e
e-pected
4afety of
pr!nc!pal
1! ! 10 1.6
@o r!s 1( ( "( 2.5
#atur!ty per!od ! 0 0 3.6
&erms and
cond!t!ons
# !9 .;
total 50 12 1.2
+hi s&uare' , -observede%pected-/ ' 1!."
$%pected
t df 4!53 the table value is 9.!66 which is less than the calculated value.
7ence < !s re ected
I i l f l ! t, t ! t t f t 7 f
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
12/21
Interpretation: people prefer lo r!s as t,e most !mportant factor 7efore
!n"est!ng !n mutual funds or ?@P4 .
*pt!ons frequency Percentages
Yes ! 68
No 10 32
total 50 100
6.Do you have any other investment/insurance policy?
3$%
1&%
50%
%reque!"
Interpretation8 06 of the people had bou2ht other investment policies.
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
13/21
/.(eason for !n"ested !n 4A#F and ?@P4.
(eason No. of
(espondents
)ssoc!ated !t, 4A (
Aetter (eturn (
)gents )d"!ce 1(
&
'
(&
('
)&
)'
*&
*'
%o+ o Respon
( f ! t d ! 4A#F d ?@P4
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
14/21
(eason for !n"ested !n 4A#F and ?@P4
nterpretat!on+
:ut of (( investors of S;I
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
15/21
8.4ource of !nformat!on for customers a7out #utual Funds and
4ource of
!nformat!on
No. of
(espondents
)d"ert!sement 16
Peer >roup "(
Aan )
F!nanc!al )d"!sors 0"Advertisement Peer Group ,an
&
(&
)&
*&
-&
'&
.&
/&
N'( ' Re)*'+e
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
16/21
4ource of !nformat!on for customers a7out #utual
Funds and ul!ps$
nterpretat!on+
=rom the above chart it can be inferred that the =inancial dvisor is the
most important source of information about
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
17/21
;.(eason for not !n"ested !n 4A#F and ?@P4$
(eason No. of
(espondents
Not )are "(
@ess (eturn 16
)gentBs )d"!ce ""%ot A!are ess Return
&
'
(&
('
)&
)'
%o+ o Responden
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
18/21
(eason for not !n"ested !n 4A#F and ?@P4$
nterpretat!on+
:ut of 0( people who have not invested in S;I
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
19/21
*pt!ons Frequency Percentages
15 years ""
510 years 1# 3
1015 years
1112
total 50 100
10.How long have you been investing in mutual funds
22%
1#%
11%
50%
Freque!"
*pt!ons Frequency *7ser"ed *7ser"ed o7ser
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
20/21
*pt!ons Frequency *7ser"ed
e-pected
*7ser"ed
e-pected9
o7ser
e-pect
15 years 9 ".0# #.1"69 1.126
510 years # ).0# ).!!69 0.0/0;1015 years . 11.)669 1./51
total 1; 18.666/ 2.;/;
+hi s&uare' , -observede%pected-/ ' ".9!#9
$%pected
t df 4"53 the table value is (.991 which are 2reater than the calculated value.7ence3
8/8/2019 review 2 - Copy.pptx
21/21
T h a n k
yo u2