40
Responding to SARS John Watson Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London

Responding to SARS

  • Upload
    nida

  • View
    102

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Responding to SARS. John Watson Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London. November 2002. Outbreak of pneumonic illness in Guangdong province of southern China. 11 February 2003. China declares outbreak of pneumonia in Guangdong province - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Responding to SARS

Responding to SARS

John Watson

Health Protection Agency

Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London

Page 2: Responding to SARS

November 2002

• Outbreak of pneumonic illness in Guangdong province of southern China

Page 3: Responding to SARS
Page 4: Responding to SARS

11 February 2003

• China declares outbreak of pneumonia in Guangdong province

• 300 cases and 5 deaths

Page 5: Responding to SARS

20 February 2003

• Chicken ‘flu (influenza A H5N1) in Hong Kong

• Outbreak in a family linked to southern China

• Two deaths among four ill

• Two cases confirmed influenza virus infection

Page 6: Responding to SARS
Page 7: Responding to SARS

11 March 2003

• Hong Kong reports outbreak of “acute respiratory syndrome” among hospital workers

Page 8: Responding to SARS

12 March 2003

• WHO reports to all countries the occurrence of outbreaks in Hong Kong and Hanoi (Vietnam) as well as earlier outbreak in China

• WHO recommends isolation of cases and surveillance by national health authorities

Page 9: Responding to SARS

13 March 2003

• Information prepared in UK

• CMO cascade (to all doctors) activated and Eurosurveillance published

• CDR publication delayed to next morning due to network problems

Page 10: Responding to SARS

14 March 2003

• WHO reports outbreaks in Singapore and Taiwan

• WHO worker ill in Hanoi

• WHO seeking field experts

• Aetiology still unknown

Page 11: Responding to SARS

15 March 2003

• WHO declares Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) a worldwide health threat

• Cases in Canada, Indonesia, Thailand and Philippines

• WHO guidance about travel to South-East Asia

Page 12: Responding to SARS

Sunday, 16 March 2003

• First UK-wide teleconference

Page 13: Responding to SARS

Clinical features

• Incubation period 2-7 (?) days

• Influenza-like illness

• High fever

• Cough, shortness of breath

• Other systemic symptoms

Page 14: Responding to SARS

Clinical features

• Recovery in many• Progression in some

– pneumonia– acute respiratory distress syndrome

• Death in 3-5%

• No response to anti-bacterial or anti-viral agents

Page 15: Responding to SARS

Epidemiological features

• Spread to close contacts– droplet spread or direct contact with body

fluids

• Infectious when severely ill

• Explosive outbreaks– Metropole Hotel

• International spread

Page 16: Responding to SARS
Page 17: Responding to SARS

Global SARS situation – 13 May 2003

• Total cases – 7458 (deaths 573 – 7.7%)

• Hong Kong – 1689 (23%)• Taiwan – 207 (3%)• China (mainland) – 5086 (68%)

• Singapore – 205 (3%)• Vietnam – 63 (1%)• Canada – 143 (2%)

Page 18: Responding to SARS
Page 19: Responding to SARS

Global SARS situation – 13 May 2003

• Total cases – 7458 (deaths 573 – 7.7%)

• Hong Kong – 1689 (23%)• Taiwan – 207 (3%)• China (mainland) – 5086 (68%)

• Singapore – 205 (3%)• Vietnam – 63 (1%)• Canada – 143 (2%)

Page 20: Responding to SARS
Page 21: Responding to SARS

UK results to 14 May 2003

• Total calls 380• 8 initial ‘probable’ cases

– 4 other diagnoses (1 mycoplasma, 3 ‘flu A)– 4 current, all recovered

• 159 initial ‘suspect’ cases– 63 (40%) recovered– 54 (34%) still ill– 42 (26%) other diagnoses

• ‘not a case’ - 178

Page 22: Responding to SARS

Why is SARS so dangerous?

• Lethal – 15 - 20% mortality in hosptialised patients

• Spread via respiratory route• Capable of sudden amplification in hospitals

and cities• Vulnerability of health care staff• Can spread quickly internationally• Not easily controlled cf other emerging

infections

Page 23: Responding to SARS

Early response in UK

• Surveillance system

• Laboratory strategy and guidance

• Guidance for health care professionals

• Travel guidance

• Public information

Page 24: Responding to SARS

WHO definitions for surveillance

• Suspect– >38 C– Cough or other respiratory symptom– Affected area within previous 10 days

• Probable– as above with evidence of changes on

chest x-ray

Page 25: Responding to SARS

Early response in UK

• Surveillance system

• Laboratory strategy and guidance

• Guidance for health care professionals

• Travel guidance

• Public information

Page 26: Responding to SARS
Page 27: Responding to SARS
Page 28: Responding to SARS

Summary management of a SARS case

Page 29: Responding to SARS

Early response in UK

• Surveillance system

• Laboratory strategy and guidance

• Guidance for health care professionals

• Travel guidance

• Public information

Page 30: Responding to SARS
Page 31: Responding to SARS
Page 33: Responding to SARS
Page 34: Responding to SARS
Page 35: Responding to SARS

UK Case definitions for SARS

Suspect LOW A person presenting after 1 Feb 2003 with sudden onset of:high fever (>38°C)

Andcough or difficulty breathing

And travelled in the 10 days before onset of illness to an area in which there is more than 'limited' local transmission of SARS during the travel period.

WHO website <http://www.who.int/csr/sarsareas/en/>)

Page 36: Responding to SARS

UK Case definitions for SARS

Suspect HIGH

A person presenting after 1 Feb 2003 with sudden onset of:

high fever (>38°C)

And

cough or difficulty breathing

And

had close contact with a probable SARS case from an affected area in the 10 days before onset of symptoms

Page 37: Responding to SARS

UK Case definitions for SARS

Probable caseEither: A suspect (Low or High) case with:• chest x-ray findings of pneumonia and no response

to standard antimicrobial treatment or• respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) orDeath due to an unexplained respiratory illness with

autopsy findings of RDS without identifiable cause in a person who travelled to an affected SARS area within 10 days of illness.

Page 38: Responding to SARS

Follow-up

• Follow-up categories

• Still ill• Recovered = afebrile for at least 48 hours AND

cough, if present, resolving • Dead

Follow-up forms faxed or emailed to CDSC 48 hours after the date of report ten days after the date of report and/or

A final follow-up form once the patient is asymptomatic

Page 39: Responding to SARS

CDSC SARS Surveillance

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

15/0

3/20

03

18/0

3/20

03

20/0

3/20

03

22/0

3/20

03

24/0

3/20

03

26/0

3/20

03

28/0

3/20

03

31/0

3/20

03

02/0

4/20

03

04/0

4/20

03

06/0

4/20

03

08/0

4/20

03

10/0

4/20

03

12/0

4/20

03

15/0

4/20

03

17/0

4/20

03

21/0

3/20

03

23/0

4/20

03

25/0

4/20

03

27/0

4/20

03

30/0

4/20

03

Date of reports

No

. o

f re

po

rts

Other reports

Probable and suspectedcases

Page 40: Responding to SARS