REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY … · (Appendix E of RI/FS Workpleinl 060 063 064 ... CFc'Cz I) • ... ·~ ... the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional

Golder Associates Inc.

305 Fellowship Road, Suite 200 Mt. LaureL NJ USA 08054 Tel: (609) 273-1110 Fax (609) 273-0778

ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONIFEASffiiLITY STUDY

1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTSLETTERREPORT

DISTRmUTION:

2 Copies - USEP A

Prepared for:

SCA Setvices ofPennsylvania, Inc. Three Greenwood Square

3329 Street Road · Bensalem, Pennsylvania

2 Copies - SCA Setvices ofPennsylvania, Inc. 1 Copy CH2M Hill- Murray Rosenberg 1 Copy - P ADER- Jeff Silar 1 Copy - P ADER- Tom Lever 2 Copies r- Golder Associates Inc. ,.

June 1995 Project No.: 923-6053 AR307609

OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA CANADA GERMANY, HUNGARY. ITALY, SWEDEN, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES

///5J7 --

Golder Associates Inc.

305 Fellowship Road, Suite 200 Mt. Laurel. NJ USA 08054 Tel: (609)273-1110 Fax (609) 273-0778

June 19, 1995

SCA Services ofPennsylvania, Inc. Three Greenwood Square 3329 Street Road Bensalem, PA 19020

Attn: Mr. Trevan.· Houser/Mr. Glen Schultz

Project No.: 923-6053

RE: ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RifFS . 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS LETTER REPORT

Gentlemen:

Golder Associates.Inc. (Golder) is pleased to forward herewith two copies of our Report on the Results of the 1995 Residential Well Sampling Event at the Elizabethtown Landfill which was conducted on April 25, 1995. This document includes the sampling results in USEPA Region III format that was used for Volume III of the Remedial Investigation Report dated May 1994. Please note that to finalize the metals results tables provided on June 6, 1995, two • changes were made. The CRDL column for sample RES21 contained the IDL information. The correct CRDLs now appear in this column. On page two, the parameter calcium was listed twice. The first listing for calcium was actually the cadmium data. The parameter name and CRDL have been corrected. Two copies of the Report have been sent directly to the USEP A In addition, one copy has been sent to Murray Rosenberg, CH2M Hill, one copy to Tom Lever at P ADER, and one copy to Jeff Silar at P ADER

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Very truly yours,

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC.

~k~ GeO arrest, P.G., C.P.Eng. Project Manager Project Director and Associate

LAH/GRF:lrl • D:\PRO.JECTS\923-60S3\9SSAMPCVRL1RDOC

AR3076\0

OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA CANADA GERMANY, HUNGARY, ITALY, SWEDEN, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES

June 1995 - 1 - 923-6053

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover Letter j

Table of Contents

SECTION PAGE

1.0 IN'I'R.ODUCTION .......................................................................................................... l""

2.0 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING SCOPE OF WORK ................................. 2

3.0 · RESULTS OF 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING ......................................... .4

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 1995 Residential Well Environmental Sampling

LIST OF APPENDICES

CLP Data Validation Narrative

In Order Following

Page4

Appendix A AppendixB 1995 Residential Well Sampling Results - USEP A Region III Format

• TCL Organic Results • TAL Inorganic Results

Golder Associates

a R 3·o 16 1 t

March 1993 -1- 923-6053

1.0 INTRODUCfiON

The Elizabethtown Landfill Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RifFS) Work Plan,

prepared under Administrative Order of Consent (Docket No. ID-90-44-DC), required that

certain Residential Wells be sampled during the Phase 1B and Phase 1 C Sampling Events.

These events occurred in November 1992 and December 1992/January 1993, respectively.

Following completion of the RI activities specified in the Work Plan, the USEP A requested

, that four additional residential wells be sampled during the Spring of 1995. This report

presents the results ofthe sampling event which was conducted in April1995.

This document presents the results of the 1995 Residential Well Sampling Results Letter

Report in the following format:

• Text;

• Appendix A- CLP Data Validation Narrative; and,

• Appendix B - 1995 Residential Well Sampling Results - USEP A Region ID Format.

Golder Associates

AR307612

March 1993 -2- 923-6053

2.0 . 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING SCOPE OF WORK

Samples were collected from four (4) residential wells as listed on Table 1.· Sampling locations

are shown on Figure 1. The sampling of these wells was conducted by Golder Associates on

April25, 1995. A member of the Technical Assistance Team (TAT) from Roy F. Weston was

present during the sampling event. The samples were submitted to CompuChem

Environmental Corporation for analysis ofTCL Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), TCL

Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs), TCL Pesticides, and TAL Inorganics (metals

·and cyanide). TC~ organic analysis was conducted using the Superfund Analytical Methods

for Low Concentration Water for Organics Analysis (SAM) dated October 1992. TAL

inorganic analysis was conducted using the Cq> Statement ofWork (SOW) ILM03.0. Results

of these analySes are discussed in Section 3. 0 of this report.

Samples collected from the Smitley, Mullen and Swanger residences were oollected from water

taps within the homes. The sample collected at the Espenshade residence was from a spring in

the basement.

Golder Associates f\R3076\3

March 1993 -3- 923-6053

3.0 RESULTS OF 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING

The analytical results were validated in accordance with the most current versions of the

National and Region ill data validation guidelines. The CLP data validation narrative is

included as Appendix A of this report.

Validated analytical results for samples from residential wells are presented in detail in USEP A

Region m format in Appendix B. VOCs were not detected in these samples except for 8 ug/1

oftrichloroethene in the sample collected from the spring at the Espenshade residence. SVOCs

were not detected in any of the samples: Pesticides were not detected above laboratory

method detection limits except for alpha-chlordane, gamma-chlordane, and heptachlor epoxide

which were reported in the sample from the Smitley residence. Fifteen··metals (aluminum,

arsenic, barium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, nicke~

potassium, sodium,. and zinc) were detected in these residential well samples. Lead was

detected at low levels in only samples from the Espenshade and Smitley residences. Arsenic

and cobalt were detected at low levels in only the sample from the Mullen residence. Aluminum

and nickel were only detected in the sample from the Espenshade residence. Cyanide was not

detected in any of the residential samples.

Golder Associates

AR307614

J:;ll ::0 . U)

0 -.1 CT\

(J'1

~ I f June 1995

Golder Sample ID 4/25/95 Event

RES02 FRES02

RES20

RES21

RES22

File: d:\6053\95samp\table1.wke

TABLE 1 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL ENVIRONMENTALSAMPLING

ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RI/FS

Golder 10, Figure 1, Phase II Hydrogeologicallnvestigation

(Appendix E of RI/FS Workpleinl

060

063

064

065

Residence

Espenshade (formerly Moyer Farm) Field Duplicate Taken

at Espenshade Residence

Smitley

Mullen

Swanger

923-6053

Golder Associates Page 1 of 1

EPAREGIONm S~ERFUND Doct.1MENr MANAOEMENT SYSTEM

IMAQEJtv covq sHQI t.TNSCANNAiti ITEM

DOC ID t lll5J.1 PAOE NAIL :3{)7ttl b

Coamcc tM CEllCLA Rec:orda Cemer to vin 1JUa ~

SITE NAME L;f,ittbefhT~"-' lr-trv_t.Fc ~l ( OPERABLE t1NlT VD

~-----------------------------SEcnONIBOXIFOLDER 04m; "'s.;n;tt ~ R cc.;,ai .. Ser~ on . VO~e ( ll fSI. - R\.uca~

REPOilTOR.DOCQMENTmu: faD'2d.i~ LtJtl/.R4stL1ffrt ~):&& ·DATEOPDOCUMENT ~{tot { Cf) .

DESClUP'ItON OP IMAGEllY Pwlt c_~~ Pn 'uM-e.. (.;-t4#u- SOlA rCeY.

wfl&'~. :)6@ ?f<tct-k . CFc'Cz I)

•

...

·~

AR3076l7

June 1995 -Al- . 923-:6053

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Golder has validated the analytical data for the residential well samples collected April 25, 1995 in the vicinity of the Elizabethtown Lanlifill (Site) in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The samples were collected at the request of the USEP A. Samples were collected from .four residences as shown on Table 1 of the main report. The samples were collected in accordance with the Field Sampling Plan (FSP) and the Quality Assurance. Project Plan (QAPjP) contained in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Work Plan for the Site. The samples were analyzed for the Inorganic Target Analyte List (TAL) in accordance with the :tJ.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (USEPA) Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work for Inorganics Analysis, Multi-Media, MultiConcentration (CLP SOW ILM03.0); and the Organic Target Compound List (TCL}, excluding Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in accordance with the Superfund Analytical Methods for Low Concentration Water for Organics Analysis (SAM) dated 10/92. Reporting of tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) was 'not required by the QAPjP. The analyses were performed by CompuChem Environmental Corporation (CompuChem) of Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Samples were collected from four (4) primary locations. One sampling location (RES02) was sampled in duplicate for Field Duplicate analysis. All of the samples for metals analysis were collected as unfiltered (total) portions only.

The Sample Identification Points are summarized in Table 1 of the Report.

Data validation of inorganic data collected using the CLP SOW ILM03.0 was performed in accordance with the Region III Modifications to the Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (dated April, 1993). Data validation for organic data collected using the SAM was. performed in accordance with the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (dated February 1994) and Region III Modifications to the National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, Multi-Media, Multi-concentration (dated September ~994). These documents are referred to as "functional guidelines" hereafter.

In general, the discussions which follow in Sections 2.0 through 5.0 describe only instances where the quality control criteria specified in the documents named above were not met. Tables A2 through AS of this document summarize specific samples for which qualification occurred. ·

Data qualifiers are defined in Table A1. Where quality control criteria were met, positive results were qualified as acceptable (no code) and non-detected results were qualified with a "U" flag signifying that the result is below the quantitation limit (organics) or detection limit (inorganics). Where more than one qualifier for a sample result was warranted, the most predominant or general qualifier was applied to the results. For ~ .. · example, a positive result for a volatil~ organic compound may need to be qualified as estimated (J) due to the initial or continuing calibration criteria not having been met, but this compound is also present in the a~sociated blanks and the blank action level is greater than the concentration of the compound reported in the sample. In this particular case, the compound would be qualified as "B" indicating that the concentration

Golder Associates aR301G\8

June 1995 -A2- 923-6053

is not substantially' greater than the concentration in the associated blanks. The (R) qualifier, which signifies .that the result has been rejected, takes priority over all other qualifiers. It should be noted that the discussions contained within Sections 2.0 through 5.0 explain where quality control was deficient. As specified in the functional guidelines, if the non-adherence to quality control criteria are slight, qualification of data may not be warranted. However, if the non-adherence is significant, qualification and possible rejection of the data may be necessary. The narrative discussion specifies where rejection of the data is necessary.

Following data validation and qualification, the analytical data and qualifiers for each sample point were summarized. Qualified results are provided in Appendix B of this Report in the USEPA Region III Format as previously used in Volume III of the Elizabethtown Landfill R]/FS Report dated May 1994.

Golder Assoclatft\ R 3 0 7 6 I 9

June 1995 -A3- 923-6053

2.0 TARGET COMPOUND LIST VOLATILE ORGANIC PARAMETERS

Samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate and one trip blank was collected for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The sampl~s were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and analyzed for VOCs using the SAM dated 10/92. The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.

DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES

Precision: Goals for laboratory and field precision were generally met, except where noted below.

Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generally met, except where noted below.

Sample Result Verification: All sample results were supported in the raw data.

Detection Limits: The detection limit goals were achieved for all samples except sample ·RES20.

Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) samples were validated in. this data set. A total of 200 results for these samples were reported in which 175 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 88% for these samples which meets the RI/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.

Major Deficiencies

Identified below are the major deficiencies which required rejection of the data. Refer to Table A2 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.

The initial and/or continuing calibrations had response factors (RRF) which were less than the· minimum of 0.05 for Acetone, 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone, 2-Hexanone, 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane and 2-Butanone. Since these c;ompounds were undetected in all samples in this SDG, the results were qualified as rejected (R). ·

Minor Deficiencies

Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data. Refer to Table A2 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.

Laboratory preparation blanks, storage blanks and trip blanks are evaluated for target compound conta:nUnation. Methylene chloride was found as a contaminant in various blanks for this SDG. Samples associated with these blanks required qualification. For Methylene Chloride, an action limit of 10 times· the concentration found in the blank was calculated. For sample FRES02 where Methylene Chloride was detected as a positive

Golder Associates'\ R 3 0 7 6 2 0

June 1995 -A4- 923-6053

result between the Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL) and the action limit, the result was flagged with the (B) qualifier.

The functional guidelines require that the calculated response factors remain stable over the concentration range of the initial calibration ( <30% RSD). This criterion was not achieved for the initial calibrations analyzed on 5/4/95 for Acetone, Methylene Chloride, 2-Butanone and 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane. The above listed compounds have been previously qualified for various deficiencies and require no additional qualification.

The functional guidelines require the percent differences for the response factors between the initial and continuing daily calibration be less than + 30% difference. This criteria was not achieved for the continuing daily calibration analyzed on 5/7/95 for Acetone. Since Acetone was previously qualified "R", the affected samples (RES02, RES20, RES21 and RES22) required no additional qualification.

Sample point RES20 was inadvertently analyzed at a 2.3:1 dilution. By the time the laboratory realized of the dilution, the sample was outside of the hold time window. The data was reported with elevated detection limits, no qualification of the sample data was required.

Golder Associates t\R30762\

June 1995 -AS- 923-6053

3.0 TARGET COMPOUND LIST SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC PARAMETERS

Samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate for Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). The samples were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and pnalyzed for SVOCs using the SAM dated 10/92 .. The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.

Data Quality Objectives


·Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generally met, except where noted below.


Detection Limits: The detection limit goals were achieved for all analyses.

Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) samples were validated in this data set. A total qf 300 results for these samples were reported in which 296 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 99% for these samples which meets the RI/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.

Major Deficiencies

Identified below are the major deficiencies which required rejection of the data. Refer to Table A3 for the spe~ific samples affected by each deficiency.

The initial and/or continuing calibrations had response factors (RRF) which were less than the minimum of 0.05 for 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since this compound was undetected in the affected samples (RES21, RES20, FRES02 and RES22) in this SDG, the results were

. qualified as unusable (R).

Minor Deficiencies

Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data. Refer to Table A3 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.

According to the SAM the laboratory is required to re-extract and analyze any sample that yield low surrogate recoveries for two or more base-neutral surrogates and/or acid surrogates. Low surrogate recoveries were a problem for sample RES02. As required by the SAM, the laboratory re-extracted the sample for analysis. The re-extraction of sample RES02 was performed outside of the seven day hold time window. As a result, all compounds in sample RES02 were qualified as estimated quantitation limits (UJ).

Golder Associates AR307622

.

June 1995 -A6- 923-6053

The functional guidelines require that the calculated response factors remain stable over the concentration range of the initial calibration ( <30% RSD). This criterion was not achieved for the initial calibrations analyzed on 5/15/95 for 4-Chloroaniline, N-Nitrosodiphenylamine, Butylbenzylphthalate, 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine, Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and Di-n-butylphthalate. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in any of the affected samples, no qualification was required.

The functional guidelines require that the calculated response factors remain stable over the concentration range of the initial calibration ( <30% RSD). This criterion was not achieved for the initial calibrations analyzed on 5/17/95 for 4-Chloroaniline, N-Nitrosodiphenylamine and 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in the affected sample (re-analysis of RES02), no qualification was required.

The functional guidelines require the percent differences for the response factors between the initial and continuing daily calibration be less than + 25% difference. This criteria was not achieved for the continuing daily calibration analyzed on 5/16/95 for 4-Chloroaniline, N-Nitrosodiphenylamine and 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in any of the affected samples, no qualification was required. ·

The functional guidelines require the percent differences for the response factors between the initial and continuing daily calibration be less than + 25% difference. This criteria was not achieved for the continuing daily calibration analyzed on 5/16/95 for 4-Chlo roaniline, N -Nitrosodiphenylamine, Bu tylbenzylp h thala te, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, Di-n-octylphthalate and 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in any of the affected samples, no qualification was required.

AR307623 Golder Associates

June 1995 -A7- 923-6053

4.0 TARGET COMPOUND LIST PESTICIDES

Samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate for Pesticides. The samples were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and analyzed for Pesticides using the SAM dated 10/92. PCBs analysis was not requested because PCBs are not Compounds of concern (COCs) for the Site (meeting with USEPA on November 9, 1992). The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.

Data Qualitr Objectives

Precision: Goals for laboratory and field 'precision were generally met, except where noted below.

Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generaJly met, except where noted below.

Sample Result Verification: All sample results were supported ifl the raw data. Positive presence of a TCL pesticide must . be confirmed by analysis on a dissimilar chromatographic column. Quantitation is performed for each column and the lower value is reported by the laboratory. The percent difference between the two results is calculated and reported by the laboratory.


Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) samples were validated in this data set. A total of 105 results for these samples were reported in which 105 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 100% for these samples which meets the Rl/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.

Major Defi~iencies

· There were no major deficiencies whi~h would have required rejection of the data.

Minor Deficiencies

Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data .. Refer to Table A4 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.

The matrix spike recovery for Heptachlor Epoxide was slightly outside the QC limits specified in the SAM. Using professional judgement, the data validator deemed that qualification of the non-detected result in the primary sample was not necess~ry.

The matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate relative percent differences for gamma-BHC, Endrin, and gamma-Chlordane were slightly above the control limits specified in the

. SAM. Using professional judgement, the data validator deemed that qualification of the non-detected results in the primary sample was not necessary.


June 1995 -A8- 923-6053

For pesticides analysis, if an analyte is detected on both GC columns, quantitation is performed for both columns and the lower of the two values is reported. The percent differences between the two values were greater than 25% for Endosulfan ·Sulfate in sample RES02 and Heptachlor, alpha-Chlordane, and Heptachlor Epoxide in sample RES20. All of these results were qualified as estimated values G).

Concentrations below the laboratory-derived method detection limits (MDLs) were reported for Endosulfan II and Endosulfan Sulfate in sample RES02 and for Heptachlor and Endosulfan Sulfate in sample RES20. These results were qualified with an asterisk on the data tables to indicate that the concentrations are below the MDLs.


June1995 -A9- 923-6053

5.0 TARGET ANALYTE LIST INORGANIC PARAMETERS

Unfiltered samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate for TAL Inorganics (metals and cyanide). The samples were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and analyzed for metals and cyanide using the CLP SOW ILM03.0. The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.

DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES


Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generally met, except where noted below.



Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) unfiltered samples were validated in this data set. A total of 120 results for unfiltered samples were reported in which 120 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 100% for unfiltered samples which meets the RT/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.

Major Deficiencies

There were no major deficiencies which would have required rejection of the data.

Minor Deficiencies

Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data. Refer to Table AS for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.

Various metals were found to be present in the blanks associated with these samples. Action levels were . calculated for each of these analyt~s based upon the highest concentration found in the associated blanks. Positive results in the samples greater than the instrument detection limit (IDL) but less than the action level were qualified with a B indicating that the analyte was detected substantially above the level reported in the associated blanks. Positive results above the action level and non-detected results did not require qualification.

Lead was detected in the laboratory blanks at negative absorbances indicating that sample results may ·have been negatively influenced. The non-detected results for this analyte required qualification as biased low detection limits (UL). Positive results for this· analyte required qualification as biased low values (L).

Golder AssociatAR 3 0 7 6 2 6

June 1995 -AlO- 923-6053

6.0 SUMMARY

Validation of the data collected for the 1995 Residential Well Sampling Event in the vicinity of the Elizabethtown Landfill was performed in accordance with the most current versions of the USEPA Region III data validation guidelines and the QAPjP.

Overall, the data required qualification due to some quality control criteria which were not achieved, but the majority of the data may be deemed usable. Although a positive result was qualified as estimated, the analyte should be considered present. Similarly, a non-detected result which was qualified as an estimated quantitation/detection limit should be considered not present for the purposes of this study, although the limit itself may not be precise. Rejected (unusable) data that are assigned the "R" qualifier should not be used. Rejected data have been included in the summary tables only for the purpose of completeness.

z:\6053\95samp\rw95.nar


June 1995 923-6053

TABLEAl

GWSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES

CODES RELATED TO IDENTIFICATION (confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):

U = Not detected. The associated number indicates approximate sample concentration necessary to be detected.

NO CODE= Confirmed identification.

B = Not detected substantially above the level reported in laboratory or field blanks.

R = Unusable result. Analyte ~ay or may not be present in the sample.

N = Tentative identification. Consider present.

CODES RELATED TO OUANTITATION . (can be used for both positive results and sample quantitation/detection limits):

J = Analyte present. Reported value may not be accurate or precise.

K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower. ·

L. = Analyte present. Reported value may be bia.Sed low. Actual value is expected to be higher.

UJ = Not detected. Quantitation/detection limits may be inaccurate or impr.ecise.

UL = Not detected. Quantitation/detection limit is probably higher.

OTHER CODES

NJ = Qualitative identification questionable due to poor resolution. Presumptively present at approximate quantity.

Q = No analytical result.

z:\qualdef.doc Golder Associates Page 1 of 1

AR307628

TABLE A2 DATE: June 16, 1995 PROJECT NAME: Elizabethtown Landfill RI/FS ANALYSIS: TCL Volatiles 10/92 SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP NUMBER: 00001 REVIEWER: Jeffrey Hendel

DEFICIEN I

Blank contamination

RRF less than 0.05 for initial and continuing calibration

Response factors unstable over the concentration range of the initial calibration (RSD > 30%)

% difference between the inital and continuing RRFs exceeds 30%

COMPO

Methylene Chloride

Acetone, 2-Hexanone, 2-Butanone, 1 ,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane;

Pentanone

Methylene Chloride, Acetone, . 2-Butanone, 1 ,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

B

R

J for positive results

No action for non-

detected results


No action for nondetected results

PROJECT NO.: 923-6053.0630

RES02, RES20, RES22

RES02, RES20, RES22

RES02, RES20,

AFFECTED

FRES02

FRES02, RES21,

FRES02, RES21,

RES21, RES22

VOC0001.XLS Golder Associates AR307629

1 of 1

June 16, 1995 NAME: Elizabethtown Landfill RI/FS

IS: TCL Semi-Volatiles 10/92 SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP NUMBER: 00001 REVIEWER: Jeffrey Hendel

DEFICIENCY.

re•extracted outside of holding time

COMPOUND(S) ..

TABLE A3

RRF less than 0.05 for continuing calibration

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine

Response factors unstable over the concentration range of the initial calilvation (RSD > 30%)

% difference between the inital

and continuing RRFs exceeds 25%

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine,

4-Dinitrophenol, Pentachlorophenol, Pyrena, Butylbenzylphthalate,

QUALIFIER

UJ for nondetected results

J for positive

R

J for positive results'



No action for non-


No action for non

d

results




PROJECT NO.: 923-6053.0630

RES20, RES22,

RES21, RES22,

FRES02,

RES02

RES02

RES21, FRES02

RES20, FRES02

RES21

SVOC0001.XLS Golder Associates 1 of 1

AR307630

DATE: June 16, 1995 PROJECT NAME: Elizabethtown Landfill RI/FS ANALYSIS: TCL Pesticide 10/92 SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP NUMBER: 00001 REVIEWER: Lori Hendel

DEFICIENCY COMPOUND(S)

Matrix spike Heptachlor Epoxide recovery below control limits

MS/MSD relative percent gamma-BHC difference above control limits Endrin

gamma-Chlordane

%0 between concentrations Endosulfan Sulfate reported on each GC column greater than 25%

Concentration reported by Endosulfan II laboratory is below the Endosulfan Sulfate laboratory MDL Heptachlor

Endosulfan Sulfate

PESTOOO 1 .XLS

TABLE A4

QUALIFIER


No action for non-detected results

J

J

*

*

Golder Associates

PROJECT NO.: 923-6053.

SAMPLES AFFECTED

RES21

RES21

RES02

RES20

RES02

RES20

1 of 1

AR307631

TABLE A5 DATE: June 1, 1995 PROJECT NO.: 923-6053.0630 PROJECT NAME: Elizabethtown Landfill RifFS ANALYSIS: TAL (unfiltered) lnorganics - CLP 3/90 SOW (ILM03.0)

PLE DELIVERY GROUP NUMBER: 305406 ~e·vn;w'ER: Lori Anne Hendel

I DEFICIENCY ANALYTE(S) QUALIFIER

B for positive results greater than

Aluminum, Barium, the IDL and less Cadmium, Magn'esium, than the action

Analyte present in instrument and/or Potassium, Sodium, level preparation blanks above IDL Vanadium

No action for positive results

greater than the action level

No action for non-detected results

Analyte reported below the Lead L for negative IDL in the instrument blanks. positive results

UL for non-detected results

SD305406.XLS Golder Associates

. ..

JtR307632

SAMPLES AFFECTED

RES02, FRES02, RES20, RES21, RES22

RES02, FRES02, RES20, RES21 RES22

1 of 1

I

AR307633

l::la ::0 c...:> C:) "-..J 0'\ w -;&:-

J 995 923-6053

. Elizabethtown Residential Well Cross- identification List

Golder ID, Figure 1, Phase II Hydrogeological Investigation

Golder Sampte 10, 4/25/95 event (Appendix E of RI/FS Workplan) Residence

RES02 FRES02 060

Espenshade (formerly Moyer Farm) field duplicate taken at Espenshade residence

'RES20 . 063 Smitley

RES21 064 Mullen

RES22 065 Swanger

b:\ead\etown\wellid. wk3 Golder Associates Page 1 of 1

I'

Jvne 1

ld Wei IS

ANALYSES DFILLRI/FS

Residential WeU"5'limple Results Volatile Organics

Matl Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point

FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 2.3 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA

l:illt :0 w 0

CRQL 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5

Parameter Acetone Benzene Brornochlorornethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane -2-Butanone carbon Disulfide Carbon Tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane _1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone

-----

'-..1 Nofes:· All units are pg/1...

SQL 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

L

Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result <5 R ·5 <5 R 11 <11 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2

. <5 R 5 <5 R 11 <11 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 R 1 <1 R 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2

. <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 . u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 . u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 . u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <5 R 5 <5 R 11 <11

-·

(1') Sample Quantitation Umit (SQL) Is the CRQL multiplied by the dilution factor and adjlltlted for percent moisture as appropriate. W The Qual column Indicates the qualifier applied to the result following data validation <- below).

C.O "Result below the laboratofy MJL. NA- Not Applicabfe.

Qualifiers ................................................................................................................................................... .

Qual SQL R 5 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 R 5.

u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 R 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 ,, u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 R 5

,J - Estimated (Semiquantitative) Data UJ - Nat Detected/Estimated Data R- Unusable Data K- Biased High (Semiquantitative) Data U - Nat DetectediQuarditatiYe Data Q- Nat Applicable

Result Qual <5 R <1. u <1 u <1 u <1. u

•<1 u <5 R <1 u <1 u <1" u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 R <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 . u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <5 R

L - Biased Low (SemlquantitatiYe) Data UL - Nat Delecled/Biaeed La.v N - T entalive ldentillcation B-~ In aaoclated blanks (Semlquanlilatlve Data) (No Code)- Confirmed ldentlflcalion

ACCESS\Itown.mb1~ Nf)Ort.-

923-6053

Sample Point RES22

Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual 5 <5 R 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 5 <5 R 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u

I 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 R 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 -u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 ' u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 5 <5 R

P8ge 1

June 1995 SUMMARY OF CLP ORGANICS ANALYSES ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RifFS

Residential Well Sample Results Volatile Organlca

Matl riX: Residential Well$ Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point

l:ll :0 (.,)

0 -.J (7\

c...:> 0"'1

Sample Point FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21

Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4I2SI95 Date Sampled: ~ Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 2.3 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA

CRQL Pa,rameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result

5 4-Methyf-2-Pentanone 5 <5 R .5 <5 R 11 <11 2 Methylene Chloride 2 1 B 2 <2 u 5 <5

1 styrene 1 <1 ·u f <1 u 2 <2 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 1 Tetrachloroethene 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2

1 Toluene 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 -

1 1,1,1-Trlchloroethene 1 • <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2

1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 1 Trlchloroethene 1 8 1 8 2 <2 1 Vlnyt Chloride 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 1 Total Xyfenes 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 .

Notes: All unh are pg/1.. Sample Quantllation Umlt (SOL) Is the CRQL multiplied boJ the dll'ullon fador and adjusted for percent moisture as appropriate. The Qual column lndicat• the qualifier llpplied lo the reUt follaMng data validation <-below). "Resuut below ltle labondofy Kll.. NA • Not Applk:able.

Qualifiers .................................................................................................................................................. ;.

Qual SQL

R 5 u 2 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1

J • E&tim«Md (Semiquantitatiw) Data UJ ·Not Detec!ediEalmated Data R • Unuuble Data K ·Biased High (Semiquantlta1iw) Data U ·Not Detec!ed/Quantilatiw Data Q • Not Appl'k:able

Result <5 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

L • Biased Low (Semlquantltatiw) Data UL- Not Detected/Biased Low N • Tentatiw ldeniJk:ation

Qual R u u u u u u u u u u

B-~In aaociaCed b1anb (Semlquantltatiw Data) (No Code) ·Confirmed ldentlllcaflon

~~

923-6053

5arnple Point RES22

Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Mollsture: NA SQL Result Qual

5 <5 R 2 <2 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u

~2

]:II

:xJ (....)

a .....,J

0'\ eN ......,J

June

5

ANALYSES _ RI/FS

Residential Well Sample Results Semivolatile Organics

'Matrix: Residential Well Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point

FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Mo·isture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA

CRQL Parameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result 5 Acenaphthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 - Acenaphthylene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ . 5 <5 5 Anthra<:ene 5 <5" u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(a)Anthracene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Butytbenzylphthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 4-Chloro-3-Methy1phenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 4-Chloroaniline 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 bis(2-Chloroelhoxy)Methane 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 bis(2-Chloroethyl)ethe 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2-Chloronaphthalene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2-Chlorophenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5. <5 5 4-Chlorophenyl-phen 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Chrysene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Dlbenz(a,h)Antlncene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Dibenzofuran 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 3,3'-Dichlorobenzldlne 5 <5 R 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2,4-Dichlorophenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Diethylphthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2,4-Dlmethylphenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Dimethyl Phthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Di-n-butylphthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 20 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 20 2,4-Dinltrophenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 5 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2,6-Dinltrotoluene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 bis(2-EthylheXyt)Phthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Fluoranthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(b)Fiuoranthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(k)Fiuoranthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Fluorene ---- 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5

Notes: -*'II units are ll1JIL. Sample Cuantilalion Umit (SOL) is l11e CRQl multiplied by l11e dilution factor and adjusted for percent moisture as a.pproprlate. The Qual column lndicatea the qualifief applied to the result following data validation <- below). "Result below lire Jaboralory P4ll..

NA- Not Applicable.

Qual SQL Result Qual u 5 <5 u u 5' <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u R 5 <5 R u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 20 <20 u u 20 <20 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u . u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u . 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u

Quallfiefs ................................................................................................................................................... . J - Elllmated (Semiquantitatiw) Data UJ -Not Detected/Estimated Data K- Bined High (Semlquantltative) Data U -Not Detected/Quantitative Data

• L - Biased Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL- Not Detected/Biased Low B-~ in associated blanks (Semiquantltatiwl Data)

ACCESS\elown.mb1~port\ r.port_.

11111!1115 10:2!1:33 AM Golder Associates

R - Unusable Data Q - Not Applicable N - Tentative IdentifiCation (No Code) -Confirmed IdentifiCation

923-6053'

Sample Point RES22

Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual

' 5 <5· u 5 <5 u !

5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 '<5 u 5 <5 u '

5 <5 u 5. <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u

. 5 <5 u 5 <5 R 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <.5 u 5 <5 u

Page 1

l::a ::0 (,..,)

0 ---a (7)

c..v c::o

Jl!fl81995 SUMMARY OF CLP ORGANICS ANALYSES E.LIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RVFS

Resldeqtial Well Sample Results Semivolatlle Organics

Ma trix: Residential Wells Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point

FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21 Date 5ampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: .o4l25l95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 - Dilution Factor. 1.0 DIMion Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA

CRQL Parameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual

5 Hexachlorobenzene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Hexachlorobutadiene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 -Hexachlorocyclopentadlene 5 <5 , u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Hexachloroethane 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 lsophorone 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2-Methytnaphthalene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2-Methylpl'lerd 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 4-Methyllpl'lerd 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Naphthalene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 20 2-Nitroanllne 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 20 3-Nitroai'WIIne 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 20 4-Nltroanllline 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 5 Nitrobenzene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2-Nitrophenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 20 4-Nitrophenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 5 N-Nitroso-di-n-pro 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 N-Nitrosodiphenyfamlne 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2,2' -Oxybls(1-Cilloropraplne) 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 20 Pentachlorophenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 5 Benzo(g,h,I)P..,_ 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Phenanthrene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Phenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5

5 ~ 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(a)Pyrene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5

5 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5

20 2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20

5 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol_ 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5

Noles: All units are IJIJI'L. Sample QuantHation Umil (sat.) is the CRQL mulllpl'ied by the dl'lution factor and adjusted for percent moisture as a,ppropriate. The Qual column Indicates the qualiflet' appl'ied to the result following da1a validation (see below).

"Result below lhe labora1ort MOL.

NA-Nol~. Qualifier$ .................................. - .............................................................................................................. ..

u 5 u 5· u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 20 u 20 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 5

J - Esllmaled ~nlltatlwt) Data W -Not Detectedi'Eatlmated Data R- Unuuble Data K- Blaed High (SemiquantilatMI) Data u -Not DeteclediQuantilatlwt Data a- Not Applicable

<5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <20 u <20 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <5 u

l· BiMed Low (Semiquantitative) Data ut - Not DetectediBined Low N - T entati't'e Identification B. P--.tln auocJat.ed b1anb (SemiqiMntilltive Data) (No Code)· Confirmed ldenllfication

Golder

923-6053

Sample Poilnt I RES22

Date Sampled: 4125195 DHutlon Factor: 1.0 ' I Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual,

5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 20 <20 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u

I 20 <20 u

I 5 ·<5 u

Page 2

;r;w :::0 w 0 ~ CJ')

w ~

June 1995

· Residential Wells

SUMMARY O'F CLP ORGANICS ANALYSES ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RifFS

Residential Well Sample Results Pesticide Organics

Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21

Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled; 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 DHution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA

CRQL Parameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result 0.01 Aldrin 0.01 <0.010 u O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.01 • <0.010 O.o1 alpha-BHC 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 beta-BHC 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 delta-BHC 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 alpha-Chlordane 0.01 <0.010 u O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.01 0.014 0.01 gamma-Chlordane 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 0.017 0.02 4,4'-DDD 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 0.02 4,4'-DDE 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 0.02 4,4'-DDT 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 0.20 Dieldrin 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 t:l 0.02 <0.020 0.01 -Endosulfan I O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.02 Endosulfan II 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02. 0.0022 J* 0.02 <0.020

0.02 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 0.0019 J* 0.02 0.0015 0.02 Endrin 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020

0.02 EndrinAidehyde 0.02 - <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020

0.02 Endrin Ketone 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020

0.01 Heptachlor 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u O.Q1 0.0014

0.01 Heptachlor Epoxlde 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 0.0099 0.10 Methoxychlor 0.10 <0.10 u 0.10 <0.10 u 0.10 <0.10 1.0 Toxaphene 1.0 <1.0 u. 1.0 <1.0 u 1.0 <1.0

Notes: All units are !J91l. Sample Quantitation Limit (SQL) is the CRQL multiplied by the dilution factor and adjusted fro percent moisture as appropriate. The Qual column Indicates ~ qual,ifl« applied lo the result following data validation (see below).

"Result below the laboratcxy MDI...

NA • Not Applicable.

Quallflera ................................................................................................................................................... .

Qual SQL u 0.01 u 0.01 u 0.01 u 0.01 u 0.01 J 0.01

O.Q1

u 0.02 u 0.02 u 0.02. u 0.02 u 0.01 u 0.02 J* 0.02 u 0.02 u 0.02 u 0.02 J* 0.01 J 0.01 u 0.10 u 1.0

J • Estimated {Semiquantitative) Data W • Not DetecledJE&timated Data R • Unusable Dala K. Biated High (Semiquantitative) Data U ·Not DetectlldiQuantitatlve Data Q • Not Applicable

Result <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020•

<0.010 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.010 <0.010 <0.10

___ <1.0-

L • Blued Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL ·Not Detected/Biased Low N ·Tentative IdentifiCation

Qual

u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u_

B • ~ In aaoclated blanks (Semiquantitative Data) (No Code) • Confinned Identification

ACCESS'Mown.mb11pest-report\ report.pat

ll/11W510:1g:58 AM Golder Associates

923-6053

Sample Point RES22

Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual

0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.10 .. <0.10 u 1.<!___ <1.0 U I

~1

:t» :::0 w 0--.......l 0" .a:::-0

June 1995

Matrix: Res,ldentlal Wellls

Sample POint FRES02

Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: NA Percent Solids: NA

Parameter CRDL IDL Result Qual

Aluminum 200 19.2 606

Antimony 60 1.9 <1.9 u Arsenic 10 3.2 <3.2 u Barium 200 0.2 124

Beryllium 5 0.2 <0.20 u Cadmium 5 0.3 <0.30 u Calcium 5000 28.5 30300 Chromll!m 10 0.9 6.8

Cobalt 50 0.6 <0.60 u Copper 25 0.7 7.0

Iron 100 15.7 477

Lead 3 1.9 11.6 L

Magnesium 5000 4.0 7690

Manganese 15 0.3 17.9

Mercury 0.2 0.2 <0.20 u Nickel 40 1.4 2.3

Potassium 5000 16.7 1530

Selenium 5 4.4 <4.4 u Silver 10 0.5 <0.50 u Sodium 5000 202.0 8990

ThaJJ,Ium 10 4.5 <4.5 u Vanadium 50 0.4 1.2 B

Zinc 20 1.4 13.0

Cyanide 10 10.0 <10.0 u

Notes: Alii units are J.191L.

SUMMARY Of CLP TOTAL INORGANfCS ANALYSES

ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RifFS

Realdentlal Well Sample Results

Sample Point Sample Point RES02 RES20

Date Sampled: 4125195 . Date Sampled: 4125195 D'ilution Factor: NA Dilution Factor: NA Percent Solids: NA Percent Solids: NA

CRDL IDL Result Qual CRDL IDL Result

200 19.2 619 200 19.2 103

60 1.9 <1.9 u 60 1.9 <1.9

10 3.2 <3.2 u 10 3.2 <3.2

200 0.2 129 . 200 0.2 435

5 0.2 <0.20 u 5 0.2 <0.20

5 0.3 <0.30 u 5 0.3 0.36

5000 28.5 30100 5000 28.5 78500

10 0.9 7.0 10 0.9 <0.90

50 0.6 <0.60 u 50 0.6 <0.00

25 0.7 8.9 25 0.7 38.8

100 15.7 465 100 15.7 497

3 1.9 12.1 L 3 1.9 5.4

5000 4.0 7580 5000 4.0 12500

15 0.3 17.3 15 0.3 94.7

0.2 0.2 <0.20 u 0.2 02 <0.20

40 1.4 2.7 40 1.4 <1.4

5000 16.7 1550 5000 16.7 1630.

5 4.4 <4.4 u 5 4.4 <4.4

10 0.5 <0.50 u 10 0.5 <0.50

5000 202.0 8980 . 5000 202.0 11800

10 4.5 <4.5 u 10 4.5 <4.5

50 0.4 1.0 B 50 0.4 0.86

20 1.4 19.6 20 1.4 348

10 10.0 <10.0 u 10 10.0 <10.0

Sample Quantitation Umlt (SQL) Is the Instrument Detection Umlt (IDL). The CRDLs and IDLs have been adjusted for dilution factors and percent solids as aPJXopriate .

QualifierS ................................................................................................................................................... . J: Estimated (SenWquantitative) Data UJ - Not Detected/Estimated Data R - Unusable Data

Qual

B

u u

u B

u u

L

u u

u u

u B

u

K- Biased High (Semiquantitative) Data U -Not Detected/Quantitative Data · Q- Not Applicable L- Biased Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL- Not Detected/BiaMd Low N- Tentative ldentlflcation

923-6053

Sample Point RES21

D211e Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: NA Percent Solids: NA

CRDL IDL Result Qual

200 19.2 92.2 B

60 1.9 <1.9 u 10 3.2 4.9

200 0.2 120

5 0.2 <0.20 u 5 0.3 <0.30 u

5000 28.5 15300

10 0.9 <0.90 u 50 0.6 0.72

25 0.7 <0.70 u 100 15.7 1490

3 1.9 <1.9 UL

5000 4.0 4370

15 0.3 635

0.2 0.2 <0.20 u 40 1.4 <1.4 u

5000 16.7 646

5 4.4 <4.4 u 10 0.5 <0.50 u

5000 202.0 38500 10 4.5 <4.5 u 50 0.4 <0.40 u 20 1.4 8.7

10 10.0 <10.0 u

B - Present In associated blmks (Serniquantitatl Data) (No Code)- Confirmed IdentifiCation

Auocfatls ,.. 1

et1~11:31:4111AM

l:ll :::0 (.A)

0 ......, (5'\

.r::-

Resklentlal Well sample Results Matrix: Residential Wells

sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point RES22

Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: Date sampled: Date Sampled: Dilution Factor: NA Dilution Factor: Dilution Factor: Dilution Factor: Percent Solids: NA Percent Solids: Percent Solids: Percent Solids:

Parameter CRDL IDL Result Qual CRDL IDL Result Qual CRDL IDL Result. Qual CRDL IDL Result Qual

Aluminum 200 19.2 82.9 B Antimony 60 1.9 <1.9 u Arsenic 10 3.2 <3.2 u Barium 200 0.2 80.4

BefYIIium 5 0.2 <0.20 u Cadmium 5 0.3 <0.30 u Calcium 5000 28.5 40900 Chromium 10 0.9 <0.90 u Cobalt 50 0.6 <0.60 u Copper 25 0.7 127

Iron 100 15.7 <15.7 u Lead 3 1.9 <1.9 UL

Magnesium 5000 4.0 8980

Manganese 15 0.3 1.1

Mercury 0.2 0.2 <0.20 u Nickel 40 1.4 <1.4 u Potassium 5000 16.7 1480

Selenium 5 4.4 <4.4 u Silver 10 0.5 <0.50 u Sodium 5000 202.0 10200

Thallium 10 4.5 <4.5 u Vanadium 50 0.4 0.60. B

. Zinc 20 1.4 11.8 . Cyanide 10 10.0 <10.0 u

--- --- --

Notes: All units are J.I!J{L. Sample Quantitation U,mit (SQL) Is the Instrument Detection Limit (IDL). The CRDLs and IDLs have been adjusted for dilution factors and percent solids as appropriate.

Qualifters .................................................................................................................................................. .. J • Estimated (Semiquantitative) Data UJ - Not Detected/Estimated Data R • Unusable Data K • Biased High (Semiquantitative) Data U -Not Detected/Quantitative Data Q • Not Applicable L- Biased Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL- Not Detected/Biased Low N ·Tentative Identification B • Present In associated blanks (Semiquantitative Data) (No Code) - Confirmed ldentlfiC8tion

ACCESS\Mown.mb1v.port-metalsllctmelllls-report

MQIVS 10:10:58 AM Gc4der Associates Plge 2

I I

I I

I I

Documents

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY … · (Appendix E of RI/FS Workpleinl 060 063 064 ... CFc'Cz I) • ... ·~ ... the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional