Upload
others
View
19
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics
Vol. 10, 2016, no. 5, 235 - 266
HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/astp.2016.6314
Relativistic Configuration Interaction Calculations
of Multi-Pole Transitions Rates and
Spectra of Ar I and Ar II
Feras Afaneh and Safeia Hamasha
Department of Physics
The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115. Jordan
Khaldoon Al Khateeb
College of Art and Sciences at Wadi Aldawaser
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Copyright © 2016 Feras Afaneh et al. This article is distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
The relativistic configuration interaction method of the flexible atomic code
(FAC) was used to calculate atomic data for multi-pole transitions in Ar I and Ar
II. Large-scale calculations were performed to produce atomic structure and
spectra data with ∆n ≠ 0 (n=3→4, 5, 6). Energy levels, oscillator strengths and
transition rates are calculated for electric-dipole (E1), electric quadruple (E2),
electric octupole (E3), magnetic dipole (M1), magnetic quadruple (M2) and
magnetic octupole (M3) transitions. The produced atomic data are important in
modeling of M-shell spectra of Ar ions in laser, astrophysics and plasma
diagnostics. Correlation effects to all orders are considered in the calculations by
the configuration interaction expansion, and all relativistic effects are included.
Some calculated energy levels are compared against published values. An
excellent overall agreement is observed.
Keywords: Atomic Structure; Oscillator Strengths; Transition Probabilities;
Multi-pole Configuration Interaction; Ar Ions; Allowed Transitions; Forbidden
Transitions
236 Feras Afaneh et al.
1. Introduction
Argon is widely used in the manufacturing industry, health sector and also used
for lighting and TIG welding purpose. Argon plasma is widely used for
fundamental plasma spectroscopy studies as well as for numerous application
involving technical plasmas, such as gas lasers and spectra-chemical
investigations with inductively coupled plasmas. It is most widely used in plasma
discharge devices for a large amount of applications that range from wavelength
reference standards to controlled fusion experiment. The kinetics modeling of
laboratory as well as astrophysical plasma requires accurate radiative transition
rates [1]. The detailed understanding of the atomic structure and the investigations
of transition rates in multi- charged ions are of great relevance to plasma
diagnostics and astrophysics.
The relative intensities of forbidden transitions are frequently employed as a
sensitive tool for plasma density diagnostics and coronal lines analysis [2]. For
example the magnetic dipole M1 transitions ratios M1/E1 has been used to
determine the electron density of plasma [3]. M1 lines occur at larger wavelengths
than E1 lines while they connect to levels in the same electron configurations. If
the larger lines extend to visible or near UV range then high resolution techniques
can be used to determine detailed information about lines. Due to the weakness of
the electric quadrapole transitions (E2), the lifetime within indicated accuracy is
determined by the M1 transition. The magnetic dipole M1, and electric
quadrupole E2 have been connected to main features in the optical spectra of
aurora and planetary nebulae [4, 5]. In stellar and solar plasma Argon ions lines
are observed as well as in the laboratory plasma [6]. The spectral lines of argon
are used in determination of chemical abundances of elements of stellar plasmas
[7]. Several experimental studies investigated Ar plasma sources [7-12]. Also
many studies focused on the transition parameters in argon ions. E. B. Saloman
compiled all experimental and theoretical atomic data available in literature for all
argon ions starting from Ar II to Ar XVIII [13]. Also they are listed in NIST data
base [14]. Some forbidden transition parameters of some Ar ions were reported in
several studies [15-21]. M1and E2 transition parameters for Ar III were recently
calculated by L. Özdemir et, al. [22]. Several methods of calculations were used to
calculate atomic data for some Ar ions. Multi-configuration Hartree–Fock
relativistic (HFR) approach is used to calculate the weighted oscillator strengths
and lifetimes for the Ar III [23]. S. N. Nahar used the close-coupling
approximation employing the R-matrix method to calculate allowed transitions of
ArV. [24]. Also C. A. Ramsbottom et, al. used R-matrix method to compute
electron impact excitation collision strengths in Ar IV. [25]. Multi- configuration
Dirac Fock (MCDF) method is used for the calculations of M1 transitions in Ar13+
and Ar14+ [26]. Leyla Özdemir, et al [22] calculated forbidden transitions
magnetic dipole, M1, and electric quadrupole, E2 of doubly ionized argon (Ar III)
using the multi-configuration Hartree-Fock approach within the framework of the
Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian.
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 237
Because of the critical importance of the forbidden lines in plasma temperature
and density diagnostic, and the above mentioned importance of argon ions atomic
data of allowed and forbidden transitions for astrophysical and laser and
laboratory studies. It is noticed the lack of recent data for Ar I. The only available
study is reported in 1973 [27]. Also there is a lack of atomic data about magnetic
quadruple, magnetic ouctupole, and electric octupole transitions. Most of the
motioned studies focused on one or two Argon ions. In this work we aimed at
providing comprehensive large scale atomic structure and spectra calculations for
multi-pole transitions of Ar (Ar I) and Ar1+ (Ar II). The main objective is to
produce accurate atomic data that will provide direct access to the important
spectroscopic properties of Ar atoms and ions for both allowed and forbidden
transitions. By comparing the produced data with other previously calculated data
we will benchmark the atomic theories of the methods of calculations.
We performed large scale calculations from n=3 to n=4, 5, 6 shell numbers for
allowed and forbidden transitions. The calculated atomic data includes the energy
levels, oscillator strengths and transition rates for allowed transition (electric
dipole E1) and forbidden (multi-pole) transitions, electric quadruple E2, electric
octupole E3, magnetic dipole M1, magnetic quadruple M2, magnetic octupole
M3. To simulate the Ar experimental spectra we produced synthetic spectra of
both allowed and forbidden transitions of the selected Ar ions individually. The
produced data are tabulated and discussed along with their theoretical spectra.
2. Theoretical model
The relativistic multi configuration interaction (RMCI) method is used to perform
large scale calculations from n=3 to n=4, 5 and 6 shell numbers of Argon atom
(Ar I) and singly ionized Ar ion (Ar II or Ar1+). The Flexible Atomic Code (FAC)
[28] is used to perform the calculation. The calculated data of transitions
parameters were used to calculate synthetic spectra for both allowed and
forbidden transitions [29].
Starting with Dirac equations, ground state configuration for Ar I or Ar II ion is
used to construct a fictitious mean configuration with a fractional occupation
number that takes into account the electron screening of involved configurations.
Bound states are calculated in the configuration mixing approximations with
convenient specification of mixing scheme. Modified self-consistent Dirac-Fock-
Slater iteration is performed to derive a local central potential that is used to
derive the radial orbitals for the construction of basis states. The energy levels are
calculated by digonalizing the constructed Hamiltonian. A correction procedure is
applied to reduce errors in the calculated energy levels.
The relativistic Hamiltonian (H) for an atomic ion with n electrons (in atomic
units) is:
H = ∑ HD(i) + ∑1
rij
Ni<j
Ni=1 (1)
238 Feras Afaneh et al.
where HD (i) is the single electron Dirac Hamiltonian due to nuclear charge
potential. The approximate atomic state functions are: Ψ = ∑ bμμ φµ, where µ are
the basis states which are anti-symmetric sums of the products of the N Dirac
spinors φnkm. Where φnkm =1
r(
𝑖Pnk(r)χkm(θ, ϕ, σ)
Qnk(r)χ−k,m(θ, ϕ, σ)) ; and bµ are the mixing
coefficients obtained by diagonalizing the total Hamiltonian. n is the principle
quantum number, k is the relativistic angular momentum which is equal to (l-
j)(2j+1); m is the magnetic quantum number; l is the orbital angular momentum;
and j is the total angular momentum. km is the spin angular function; Pnk and Qnk
are the large and small components, respectively. Pnk and Qnk satisfy the coupled
Dirac equation for local central field V(r),
(d
dr+
k
r) Pnk = α (ϵnk − V +
2
α2) Qnk (2)
(d
dr−
k
r) Qnk = α(−ϵnk − V)Pnk (3)
Where the fine is structure constant; and ϵnk is the energy eigen values of the
radial orbitals. V(r) is the sum of nuclear charge contribution potential and the
electron- electron interaction potential Ve-e(r).
𝑉(𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛−𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛)(𝑟) = 1
𝑟 ∑ 𝜔𝑛𝑘(𝑃𝑛𝑘2 (𝑟)+𝑄𝑛𝑘
2 (𝑟))𝑛𝑘
{∑ 𝜔𝑛𝑘(𝜔�́�𝑘−́𝛿𝑛𝑘,�́��́�) ∗𝑛𝑘,�́��́�
𝑟 ∫1
𝑟>(𝑃�́��́�
2 (�́�) + 𝑄�́��́�2 (�́́�))𝑑�́� ∗ (𝑃𝑛𝑘
2 (𝑟) + 𝑄𝑛𝑘2 (𝑟)) + ∑ 𝜔𝑛𝑘(𝜔𝑛𝑘 − 1) ∗ ∑ − (1 +𝐾>0𝑛𝑘
1
2𝑗𝑛𝑘) (
𝑗𝑛𝑘 𝐾 𝑗𝑛𝑘
−1
20
1
2
)
2
∗ 𝑟 ∫𝑟<
𝐾
𝑟>𝐾+1 (𝑃𝑛𝑘
2 (�́�) + 𝑄𝑛𝑘2 (�́�))𝑑�́� ∗ (𝑃𝑛𝑘
2 (𝑟) + 𝑄𝑛𝑘2 (𝑟)) +
∑ ∑ −𝜔𝑛𝑘𝜔�́��́�𝐾 (𝑗𝑛𝑘 𝐾 𝑗�́��́�
−1
20
1
2
)
2
∗𝑛𝑘≠�́��́� 𝑟 ∫𝑟<
𝐾
𝑟>𝐾+1 (𝑃𝑛𝑘(�́�)𝑃�́��́�(�́�) + 𝑄𝑛𝑘(�́�)𝑄�́��́�(�́�)) 𝑑�́� ∗
(𝑃𝑛𝑘(𝑟)𝑃�́��́�(𝑟) + 𝑄𝑛𝑘(𝑟)𝑄�́��́�(𝑟) ) } (4)
The electron-electron interaction includes the spherically averaged potential due
to bound electrons, and local approximations to the exchange interactions.
equation (4), which follows the approach of SZ code [30] after excluding the self-
interaction term in order to correct the asymptotic behavior at large r.
where: (𝑗1 𝑗2 𝑗3
𝑚1 𝑚2 𝑚3) is the Wigner 3-j symbol and r< and r> are the less or grater
of r and r’. The electron-electron contribution to average energy Ee-e is:
𝐸𝑒−𝑒 =1
2∑ 𝜔𝑛𝑘𝑛𝑘 ⟨�́��́�|𝑉𝑒−𝑒|𝑛𝑘⟩ =
1
2∑ 𝜔𝑛𝑘𝑛𝑘 ∫ 𝑉𝑒−𝑒 (𝑟) (𝑃𝑛𝑘
2 (𝑟) + 𝑄𝑛𝑘2 (𝑟))𝑑𝑟 (5)
The (½) factor to the left of the summation is introduced in order to prevent
double counting of electron pairs in the summation.
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 239
Dirac coupled equations (equations 2 and 3) are solved by constructing a self-
consistent iteration where a radial orbital from a previous step is used to derive the
potential. The standard Numerov method is then used to solve the acquired
differential equation. The radial function covers a large radial distance for a given
number of grid points. Minimum distances on the radial grid are chosen to be
within the nuclear charge distribution. Maximum distances (rmax) cover the excited
states up to shell number 20. And bound energies are less than Coulomb potential
at rmax.
Radiative transition rates are calculated in a single multipole approximation where
the initial state is: ii b , the final state is: ff b , and the
multipole operator isL
MO . The second quantization method is used to solve the
Hamiltonian matrix elements by recoupling the creation and annihilation operators
with the help of Racah algebra. The line strength of the transition is: 2
i
L
Mffi OS (6)
and the weighted oscillator strength is given by:
fi
L
fi SLfg 221)(
(7)
and finally, the weighted transition rates are given by:
fifi fgAg 232 (8)
where, if EE is the transition energy.
The electric dipole E1, electric quadrapole E2, electric octupole E3, magnetic
dipole M1, magnetic quadrapole M2, magnetic octupole M3 transition
probabilities (s-1) for transitions between the excited states and the ground states
are obtained in terms of line strength Sif (a.u.) and wavelength λ (Å) as:
ifEE
fi SJ
A 1
3
181
)12(
100613.2
, if
MM
fi SJ
A 1
3
131
)12(
1069735.2
ifEE
fi SJ
A 2
5
182
)12(
1011995.1
, if
MM
fi SJ
A2
5
132
)12(
1049097.1
ifEE
fi SJ
A 3
7
173
)12(
1014441.3
, if
MM
fi SJ
A3
7
123
)12(
1018610.4
3. Results and Discussion
The calculations started from the ground state electronic configurations to
single excited configurations of Ar atom and Cl- like Ar (Ar1+) separately. The
240 Feras Afaneh et al.
calculated atomic data includes: energy levels, wavelengths, transition rates, and
oscillator strengths for allowed and forbidden transition. The atomic data are
calculated, tabulated and discussed.
Doppler line profile at low temperatures is used to convolute the calculated data to
synthetic spectra. The spectral lines intensity is normalized to unity in arbitrary
units. The spectra for both allowed and forbidden transitions for Ar I and Ar II are
shown and discussed along with identifications of their strong transition lines.
Argon Atom (ArI)
Argon (Ar I) has eight valance electrons, the ground electronic configuration is
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6, the ground state term is 1S0. The atomic structure calculations
of n=3 yield 27 energy levels, n= 4 yield 1177 energy levels, n=5 yield 1606
energy levels and n= 6 yield to 2114 energy levels of even and odd parities. The
3s sub-shell kept closed through the calculations. The included electronic
configurations in the calculations are: 3s2 3p6, 3s2 3d6 nl, 3s2 3p5nl, 3s2 3d5 nl,
where n= 4, 5 and 6, and l spans all the allowed orbital angular momentum for a
given n. Table 1 lists some calculated energy levels of n=4 of Ar atom by RCIM
of FAC code with the listed data in NIST database [14]. The listed data in NIST is
related to the measured energy levels in 1973 [27]. The difference between the
calculated data by RCIM and the listed data in NIST is up to 1.2263 eV. We have
used another method of calculation to check the validation of RCIM calculated
data. We followed the method of multi- reference many body perturbation theory
(MR-MBPT) [31] to calculate the energy levels of n=4 shell. The MR-MBPT
method and FAC code are both based on relativistic multi configuration
interaction method but the former includes the high order corrections of quantum
electrodynamics effect (QED) as a second order perturbation theory correction.
The maximum difference between energy levels calculated by RCIM of FAC and
MR-MBPT is 0.2443 eV. This gives an indication that the calculated data by
RCIM of FAC and MR-MBPT of a better agreement than the listed data in NIST.
But since NIST Ar I energy levels are related to an old measurement, so we
believe the calculated data by RCIM of FAC or MR-MBPT are more accurate.
Moreover FAC and MR-MBPT methods did very well in producing accurate data
in so many recent published researches as example [31-36].
The calculated optically allowed strong transitions by RCIM of FAC code
(electric dipole E1) are listed in Table (2). The closed sub-shells do not appear in
the tables. The strongest transitions lines are grouped into 3p-nd, 3p-ns, 3d-nf
transitions, where 3d-nf is the dominant group. The strongest optically allowed
transitions lie in a wide spectral range: (236-12705) Å. Figure (1) represents the
calculated synthetic atomic spectrum of Ar I with Doppler line profile at low
temperatures. The intensity is normalized to unity in arbitrary units (a.u.). The
strong transitions lines of the calculated spectrum were identified on it.
The Forbidden transitions (multi- pole) are much weaker than the electric
dipole transition. The calculated data of forbidden transitions includes the electric
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 241
quadruple E2, electric octupole E3, magnetic dipole M1, magnetic quadruple M2,
magnetic octupole M3 transitions. They are summarized in Table 2. The
calculated spectra of E2, E3 is shown in figure 2. In figure 3 the calculated spectra
of M1, M2, and M3 are shown along with the strong lines identifications. All are
identified in the figures 2 and 3. The radiative transition probabilities (A-values)
ratio of E2 transitions compared to E1 transitions are about
Ar(E2)/Ar(E1)~104/108 ~10- 4. The ratio of A values of E3 transitions compared to
E1 transitions are about Ar(E3)/Ar(E1)~101/108 ~10- 7. Also Ar(M1)/Ar(E1)~10-
2/108 ~10-10, Ar(M2)/Ar(E1) ~10-10 and For magnetic quadruple M3,
Ar(M3)/Ar(E1)~10-5/108 ~10-13.
Cl -like Ar (Ar II)
Ar II or Ar1+ has seven valance electrons, the ground electronic configuration is
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p5, and the ground state level is: 2P3/2. The atomic structure
calculations of for n=3 (3s sub-shell was kept closed) yield 122 energy levels, n=
4 yield 1486 energy level, n=5 yield 1370 energy levels and n= 6 yield to 1837
energy levels of even and odd parities. The included electronic configurations in
the calculation are: 3s2 3p5, 3s2 3p5 nl, 3s2 3p4 nl, 3s2 3d5 nl where n=4, 5 and 6,
and l spans all the allowed orbital angular momentum for a given n. Table (4)
show part of energy levels table that was calculated by FAC code and the MR-
MBPT method compared with available data in NIST database. The maximum
difference between the energy values calculated by FAC and MR-MBPT methods
is less than 0.2 eV, while the difference between the calculated energy by FAC
and the listed data by NIST is less than 0.8 eV. Actually the comparison of energy
levels of our calculated data with NIST data of Cl-like Ar is in better agreement
than the NIST energy levels of Ar I.
The electric dipole E1 transitions rates, wavelengths, and oscillator strengths are
calculated and listed in Table 5 for only strong optically allowed transitions. They
are grouped into 3p-nd, 3s-np and 3d-nf transitions, where 3d -nf is the dominant.
The calculated synthetic atomic spectrum of Ar II with Doppler line profile is
shown in Figure 4. We found the intense lines are related to 3p-6d transitions in
the spectral range ~ (450-600) Å, 3p-4s transitions in the range ~ (650-750) Å
while 3d-nf are the strongest lines in the whole spectral range ~ (450-1550) Å.
The upper spectrum in figure 4 is for the whole spectral range, while the lower
one is for part of the spectra where the lines other than 3d-nf transitions may
appear. All the strong lines in the whole spectral range are identified on figure 4.
Forbidden transitions (multi-pole transitions) are calculated by RCIM of FAC.
They are listed for strong strongest transitions in Table (5). The synthetic spectra
for electric forbidden transitions E2 and E3 are shown in figure 5 while the
synthetic spectra for magnetic forbidden transitions M1, M2 and M3 are shown in
figure 6. The transitions lines for multipole transitions were identified on the
figures 5 and 6. The A-values ratio of E2 transitions compared to E1 transitions
242 Feras Afaneh et al.
are about Ar(E2)/Ar(E1)~104/109 ~10-5. The ratio of E3 transitions compared to E1
transitions is: Ar(E3)/Ar(E1)~10-1/109 ~10-10. The transition rates ratios for M1,
M2, and M3 to E1 transitions are respectively: Ar(M1)/Ar(E1)~10-1/109 ~10-10,
Ar(M2)/Ar(E1)~10-2/109 ~10-11, and Ar(M3)/Ar(E1)~10-5/109 ~10- 14.
4. Conclusions
The fully relativistic configuration interaction method (RCIM) of the flexible
atomic code is applied to produce atomic data for energy levels and multipole
transitions of Ar I and Ar II ion. RCIM is expected to yield accurate data as it
includes correlation and relativistic effects by following Dirac- Fock method. It
takes in all leading relativistic effects, and treats correlation effects to all orders.
Wavelengths, radiative transition rates, and oscillator strength values for electric
dipole E1, electric quadruple E2, electric octupole E3, magnetic dipole M1,
magnetic quadruple M2 and magnetic octupole M3 were calculated, tabulated and
their synthetic spectra were produced. The strong transitions were identified
where 3d-nf transitions dominated the optically allowed transitions.
There is a good agreement between the energy levels calculated by RCIM of
FAC for Ar I and the NIST database with difference less than 1.2 eV. Also there
is a good agreement with calculated energy levels of Ar II and NIST database, the
energy difference is less than 0.8 eV. The calculated atomic data reported in this
paper should be reasonably unique and accurate for Ar I and Ar II that are very
helpful for Ar plasma diagnostics and modeling and may other applications of Ar
ions.
Acknowledgements. We acknowledge the support from the Hashemite
University.
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
3d5/2
-6f372
4d5/2
-4f5/2
3d5/2
-4p3/2
3d3/2
-5f7/2
3d3/2
-6f5/2
3d5/2
-6f7/2
3d3/2
-5f5/2
3d5/2
-5f5/2
Wavelength (A0)
Rela
tive In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
Figure (1): The produced synthetic spectrum of electric dipole E1 transitions of
Ar I
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 243
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
5d5/2
-3p1/2
5f7/2
-3p3/2
6p3/2
-3p3/2
Wavelength (A0)
Rela
tive In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
E2
5f7/2
-3p3/2
5p3/2
-3p1/2
E3
Figure 2: The produced synthetic spectra of electric quadruple (E2) and electric
quadruple E3 of Ar I
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Wavelength (A0)
5p1/2
-3p3/2
5p1/2
-3p3/2
4p3/2
-3p1/2
M3
5p3/2
-3s1/2
4d5/2
-3p1/2
4d3/2
-3p3/2
Rela
tive In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
M2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
M1
Figure 3: The produced synthetic spectra of the magnetic dipole M1, magnetic
quadruple (M2) and magnetic octupole M3 of Ar I
244 Feras Afaneh et al.
400 500 600 700 800
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
6d5/2
-3p3/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
4s3/2
-3p1/2
4s3/2
-3p1/2
6d3/2
-3p3/2
Rela
tive In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
Wavelength (A0)
4f5/2
-3d7/2
5f5/2
-3d7/2
4f5/2
-3d7/2
5f3/2
-3d7/2
5f5/2
-3d5/2
3p3/2
-4s1/2
6d3/2
-3p3/2
Figure 4: The produced synthetic spectrum of electric dipole E1 transitions of Cl-
like Ar
350 400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
350 400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
6d3/2
-3p1/2 6f
7/2-3p
1/2
4p1/2
-4p3/2
4f5/2
-3p3/2
4p3/2
-4p1/2
4p3/2
-4p1/2
4p3/2
-4p1/2
E2
6g9/2
-3p3/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
6g9/2
-3p3/2
6g9/2
-3p3/2
E3
Rela
tive In
ten
sit
y (
a. u
.)
Wavelength (A0)
Figure 5: The produced synthetic spectra of the electric quadruple E2 and electric
octupole E3 of Cl-like Ar
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 245
400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Wavelength (A0)
4p1/2
-3p3/2
4p1/2
-3p3/2
6s1/2
-3p1/2
5s1/2
-3s1/2M1
6d5/2
-3p3/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
4d5/3
-3p1/2
4d3/2
-3p1/2
4d5/2
-3p3/2
M2
Rela
tive In
ten
sit
y (
a. u
.)6d
5/2-3p
3/2
M3
Figure 6: The produced synthetic spectra of the magnetic dipole M1, magnetic
quadruple M2 and magnetic octupole M3 of Cl-like Ar
Table 1: Comparison of some n=4 energy levels (eV) for Ar atom calculated by FAC
code and MR-MBPT method against NIST database
Ar I
Lev.# Relativistic Conf. P J Energy(eV)-FAC MR-MBPT NIST
0 3p 1/22 3p3/2
4 0 0 0 0 0
1 3p3/23 4s 1/2 1 2 10.876 10.731 11.548
2 3p3/23 4 s 1/2 1 1 10.965 10.826 11.623
3 3p 1/24 s 1/2 1 0 11.055 10.908 11.723
4 3p 1/24 s 1/2 1 1 11.224 11.147 11.828
5 3p3/23 4p3/2 0 1 12.154 11.910 12.907
6 3p3/23 4p3/2 0 3 12.337 12.177 13.273
7 3p3/23 4p 1/2 0 2 12.348 12.211 13.075
8 3p3/23 4p 1/2 0 1 12.422 12.290 13.094
9 3p3/23 4p3/2 0 2 12.460 12.352 13.153
10 3p 1/24p3/2 0 2 12.563 12.453 13.171
11 3p 1/24p3/2 0 1 12.571 12.460 13.282
12 3p 1/24p 1/2 0 1 12.607 12.504 13.302
13 3p 1/24p 1/2 0 0 12.608 12.505 13.327
14 3p3/23 4p3/2 0 0 13.516 13.441 13.479
246 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table 1: (Continued): Comparison of some n=4 energy levels (eV) for Ar atom
calculated by FAC code and MR-MBPT method against NIST database
15 3p3/23 4d3/2 1 0 13.605 13.461 14.093
16 3p3/23 4d3/2 1 1 13.621 13.494 14.71
17 3p3/23 4d3/2 1 3 13.634 13.498 14.012
18 3p3/23 4d3/2 1 2 13.645 13.502 14.742
19 3p3/23 4d5/2 1 4 13.655 13.533 14.757
20 3p3/23 4d5/2 1 2 13.668 13.549 14.809
21 3p3/23 4d5/2 1 3 13.687 13.564 14.824
22 3p3/23 4f5/2 0 1 13.693 13.566 14.901
23 3p3/23 4f7/2 0 2 13.693 13.567 14.901
24 3p3/23 4f7/2 0 5 13.696 13.568 14.903
25 3p3/23 4f5/2 0 4 13.696 13.568 14.903
26 3p3/23 4f7/2 0 3 13.700 13.571 14.906
27 3p3/23 4f5/2 0 2 13.700 13.571 14.906
28 3p3/23 4f5/2 0 3 13.703 13.573 14.909
29 3p3/23 4f7/2 0 4 13.703 13.573 14.909
30 3p3/23 4d5/2 1 1 13.726 13.648 14.952
Table 2: Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ) in Å,
transition rates Ar (s- 1), and weighted oscillator strengths (gf) for the
strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Ar atom
Ar I
E1 transitions
upper state P
up J up Lower state P lower
J lower
∆E (eV) gf Ar λ (Å)
3s1/2 6p3/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 52.456 3.89E-04 1.55E+07 236.39
3s1/2 5p3/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 31.921 1.13E-02 1.66E+08 388.46
3s1/2 4p3/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 31.036 2.70E-02 3.76E+08 399.53
3p1/2 6d3/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 14.211 1.95E-02 5.69E+07 872.56
3 p3/23 6d5/2 1 1 3 p 3/2
4 0 0 14.037 1.67E-02 4.75E+07 883.37
3 p3/23 5g9/2 1 1 3 p 3/2
4 0 0 13.998 4.07E-02 1.15E+08 885.83
3p1/2 4d3/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 13.943 1.99E-01 5.60E+08 889.34
3 p3/23 5d5/2 1 1 3 p 3/2
4 0 0 13.816 2.09E-02 5.76E+07 897.54
3 p3/23 4d5/2 1 1 3 p 3/2
4 0 0 13.648 2.48E-02 6.69E+07 908.54
3p1/2 6s1/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 13.64 1.44E-02 3.86E+07 909.1
3 p3/23 6s1/2 1 1 3 p 3/2
4 0 0 13.463 2.35E-02 6.16E+07 921.05
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 247
Table 2: (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ)
in Å, transition rates Ar (s- 1), and weighted oscillator strengths (gf) for the
strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Ar atom
3p1/2 5s1/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 12.918 3.15E-02 7.60E+07 959.94
3 p3/23 5s1/2 1 1 3 p 3/2
4 0 0 12.746 3.81E-02 8.96E+07 972.82
3p1/2 4s1/2 1 1 3 p 3/24 0 0 11.147 4.11E-01 7.39E+08 1112.36
3 p3/23 4s1/2 1 1 3 p 3/2
4 0 0 10.826 3.23E-02 5.48E+07 1145.34
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 4.345 1.54E-01 1.40E+07 2853.83
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 4.343 1.26E-01 1.14E+07 2855.48
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 4.341 1.48E-01 1.10E+07 2856.56
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 0 3d3/2 3 d5/25 0 1 4.34 1.81E-02 1.48E+07 2857.16
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/24 1 7 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/24 0 6 4.289 2.15E-01 1.14E+07 2890.92
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 3.505 2.32E-01 1.13E+07 3537.47
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 0 3.433 6.29E-02 1.07E+07 3611.72
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 0 3.386 7.55E-02 1.25E+07 3662.51
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 3.241 1.65E-01 1.07E+07 3826.55
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 3.211 1.66E-01 1.06E+07 3861.19
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/24 1 7 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 6 3.084 3.77E-01 1.04E+07 4020.93
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/24 1 7 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 6 3.069 4.51E-01 1.23E+07 4039.94
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/22 1 6 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/24 0 5 3.066 3.55E-01 1.11E+07 4044.26
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 1 3 3.053 2.11E-01 1.70E+07 4061.74
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 3.05 4.26E-01 2.46E+07 4065.71
3d3/2 3 d5/24 6p3/2 1 1 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/24 0 2 3.05 7.94E-02 1.07E+07 4065.81
3d3/2 3 d5/24 6p3/2 1 1 3d3/2 3 d5/2
5 0 1 3.046 8.54E-02 1.15E+07 4070.27
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 3.044 2.17E-01 1.74E+07 4073.75
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 3.042 3.33E-01 1.91E+07 4075.82
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 3.04 7.80E-02 1.04E+07 4079.61
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 3.036 2.64E-01 1.17E+07 4084.24
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 3.034 1.48E-01 1.18E+07 4087
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 3.034 1.24E-01 1.64E+07 4087.27
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 3.034 2.61E-01 1.16E+07 4087.52
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 3.034 1.15E-01 1.53E+07 4087.65
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 3.033 1.55E-01 1.24E+07 4088.19
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 0 3d3/2 3 d5/25 0 1 3.03 3.94E-02 1.57E+07 4092.15
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 0 3d3/2 3 d5/25 0 1 3.03 2.84E-02 1.13E+07 4092.98
3d3/2 3 d5/24 6f5/2 1 3 3 d5/2
2 0 4 3.022 2.14E-01 1.21E+07 4103
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 5 2.912 4.30E-01 1.76E+07 4258.66
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 3 2.908 2.57E-01 1.89E+07 4264.54
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.907 3.37E-01 1.76E+07 4265.51
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 2.897 2.46E-01 1.28E+07 4280.36
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.876 4.38E-01 1.43E+07 4311.16
248 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table 2: (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ)
in Å, transition rates Ar (s- 1), and weighted oscillator strengths (gf) for the
strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Ar atom
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.875 3.96E-01 1.29E+07 4312.78
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 1 3 d5/22 0 2 2.866 1.64E-01 1.94E+07 4325.91
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 2 3 d5/22 0 2 2.858 1.76E-01 1.25E+07 4338.19
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 1 3 d5/22 0 2 2.854 1.26E-01 1.49E+07 4344.38
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6h7/2 1 0 3d3/2 3 d5/25 0 1 2.854 4.64E-02 1.64E+07 4344.5
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 0 3d3/2 3 d5/25 0 1 2.844 4.30E-02 1.51E+07 4359.38
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.816 3.20E-01 1.23E+07 4402.71
3d3/2 3 d5/24 5f7/2 1 3 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 2 2.808 2.52E-01 1.23E+07 4416.05
3d3/2 3 d5/24 6f7/2 1 3 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 2 2.777 2.38E-01 1.14E+07 4464.47
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 2.765 8.83E-01 2.66E+07 4485.38
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5d5/2 0 7 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 1 6 2.707 6.90E-01 1.46E+07 4581.52
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/24 1 7 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/24 0 6 2.706 6.50E-01 1.38E+07 4581.81
3d3/2 3 d5/24 4p3/2 1 0 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 1 2.625 4.20E-02 1.26E+07 4724.28
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/24 1 7 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/24 0 6 2.592 8.55E-01 1.66E+07 4783.38
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/24 1 7 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/24 0 6 2.59 9.67E-01 1.88E+07 4787.3
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 5 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 6 2.59 5.00E-01 1.32E+07 4788.25
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 2.588 3.98E-01 1.29E+07 4791.59
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 2 1 6 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 6 2.587 6.86E-01 1.53E+07 4793.29
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 6 2.585 4.47E-01 1.18E+07 4796.71
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 5 2.584 5.51E-01 1.23E+07 4798.6
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.582 3.03E-01 1.25E+07 4803.26
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.579 4.62E-01 1.48E+07 4807.79
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.577 4.56E-01 1.19E+07 4811.68
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/22 1 6 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 6 2.574 6.68E-01 1.48E+07 4816.67
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p1/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 3 2.574 3.60E-01 1.15E+07 4816.91
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 2.573 7.44E-01 1.94E+07 4819.95
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.567 5.90E-01 1.87E+07 4829.93
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4d5/2 0 3 2.519 2.23E-01 1.23E+07 4922.97
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.493 5.06E-01 1.52E+07 4974.77
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.49 5.07E-01 1.52E+07 4979.83
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.489 2.64E-01 1.02E+07 4981.38
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.489 2.71E-01 1.04E+07 4981.6
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p1/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 2.476 4.18E-01 1.24E+07 5008.84
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 0 3d3/2 3 d5/25 0 1 2.473 5.49E-02 1.46E+07 5013.79
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 1 2.465 2.30E-01 1.21E+07 5030.56
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 3 d5/22 0 0 2.464 1.83E-01 1.61E+07 5032.24
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 1 2.463 1.38E-01 1.21E+07 5035.39
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 2.461 6.87E-01 3.61E+07 5037.72
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 249
Table 2: (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ)
in Å, transition rates Ar (s- 1), and weighted oscillator strengths (gf) for the
strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Ar atom
3 d3/23 3 d5/2
2 4p3/2 1 0 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 1 2.459 1.84E-01 4.82E+07 5041.71
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 2.459 2.28E-01 1.99E+07 5042.56
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 4 1 7 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 2.438 5.91E-01 1.02E+07 5087
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2 0 6 2.419 6.18E-01 1.43E+07 5125.53
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 2.417 4.72E-01 1.33E+07 5129.99
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.284 1.06E+00 2.18E+07 5428.83
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p1/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 2.283 2.84E-01 1.28E+07 5431.14
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
42 0 4 2.283 1.12E+00 2.30E+07 5432.41
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 5 2.281 5.79E-01 1.45E+07 5437.3
3d3/2 3 d5/24 4p1/2 1 1 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 2 2.28 1.87E-01 1.41E+07 5438.66
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.277 4.55E-01 1.14E+07 5445.84
3 d3/23 3 d5/2
2 4p3/2 1 3 3 d5/22 0 4 2.277 4.01E-01 1.29E+07 5446.36
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 2.274 3.60E-01 1.62E+07 5452.26
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.274 4.10E-01 1.31E+07 5453.1
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 2.253 4.11E-01 1.01E+07 5503.37
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 2.247 2.63E-01 1.15E+07 5518.78
3d3/2 3 d5/24 5p3/2 1 1 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 2 2.228 1.58E-01 1.14E+07 5565.67
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 0 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 2.196 6.78E-02 1.42E+07 5646.48
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 1 2.159 2.08E-01 1.40E+07 5742.19
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 2.136 3.05E-01 1.21E+07 5805.58
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5g11/2 0 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 1 2 2.129 1.71E-01 1.12E+07 5824.64
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 2.122 2.64E-01 1.03E+07 5844.69
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 2.114 5.76E-01 1.02E+07 5865.63
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 2.106 2.17E-01 1.39E+07 5888.55
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 3 2.095 3.05E-01 1.16E+07 5918.17
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 2.095 3.22E-01 2.04E+07 5919.13
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 2.088 8.93E-01 1.88E+07 5938.78
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 2.086 6.14E-01 1.66E+07 5945.82
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 2.047 3.85E-01 1.00E+07 6058.19
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.998 7.70E-01 1.48E+07 6206.66
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.993 5.78E-01 1.42E+07 6222.81
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5p3/22 1 6 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/242 0 6 1.99 9.47E-01 1.25E+07 6229.67
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 1.982 1.13E+00 2.15E+07 6255.22
3d3/2 3 d5/24 4p1/2 1 5 3 d3/2
3 3 d5/23 0 6 1.982 1.41E+00 2.19E+07 6255.43
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.978 9.04E-01 2.19E+07 6268.57
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
42 0 6 1.976 1.97E+00 2.57E+07 6276.11
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 4 1 7 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 1.972 1.84E+00 2.07E+07 6287.42
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 4 1 7 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
46 0 6 1.966 2.50E+00 2.79E+07 6307.18
250 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table 2: (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ)
in Å, transition rates Ar (s- 1), and weighted oscillator strengths (gf) for the
strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Ar atom
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 1.964 1.23E+00 1.58E+07 6313.83
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5s1/2 0 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 1 0 1.958 5.07E-01 2.81E+07 6333.75
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 2 1 6 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 5 1.946 1.34E+00 1.69E+07 6373.1
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 1.943 6.90E-01 1.26E+07 6380.77
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6p1/2 1 3 3 d5/22 0 2 1.923 6.32E-01 1.45E+07 6446.64
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 2 1 6 3 d3/2
2 3 d5/24 1 5 1.92 8.24E-01 1.01E+07 6457.26
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 1 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 0 1.915 4.32E-01 2.29E+07 6475.92
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 1.911 1.13E+00 3.57E+07 6487.81
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 3 3 d5/22 0 2 1.909 7.57E-01 1.71E+07 6493.86
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 1 1.885 3.85E-01 1.19E+07 6577.67
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 1.883 7.64E-01 1.31E+07 6584.56
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 1.882 6.21E-01 1.36E+07 6588.2
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6d5/2 0 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 1.881 6.05E-01 1.03E+07 6591.68
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6p3/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 1.881 4.99E-01 1.09E+07 6592.64
3 d3/23 3 d5/2
2 5f5/2 1 5 3 d5/22 0 4 1.862 9.07E-01 1.24E+07 6658.51
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.861 6.67E-01 1.43E+07 6664.71
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 1.827 1.50E+00 1.98E+07 6788.9
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 1.826 2.51E+00 2.79E+07 6790.51
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 4 1 7 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 1.819 1.94E+00 1.86E+07 6818.32
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.818 8.42E-01 1.73E+07 6821.3
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.817 5.11E-01 1.46E+07 6823.8
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 1.809 4.46E-01 1.27E+07 6854.18
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 1.807 5.14E-01 1.04E+07 6860.64
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.805 7.21E-01 1.13E+07 6868.47
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4d5/2 0 3 1.801 5.33E-01 1.07E+07 6884.7
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 4 1 7 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 6 1.783 2.03E+00 1.87E+07 6954.98
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 1.783 1.72E+00 1.83E+07 6955.63
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 2 1.782 4.44E-01 1.22E+07 6957.76
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.777 8.32E-01 1.04E+07 6977.19
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 5 1.772 9.64E-01 1.01E+07 6998.75
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 4 1 7 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 6 1.762 2.90E+00 2.60E+07 7038.02
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 1.761 2.45E+00 2.54E+07 7039.58
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 2 1 6 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 6 1.76 1.27E+00 1.32E+07 7045.89
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.754 1.20E+00 1.46E+07 7068.75
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.753 6.79E-01 1.01E+07 7072.77
3 d3/23 3 d5/2
2 4p3/2 1 4 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 5 1.75 9.82E-01 1.45E+07 7084.27
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.749 5.62E-01 1.07E+07 7090.33
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4s1/2 0 3 1.748 4.84E-01 1.28E+07 7092
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 251
Table 2: (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ)
in Å, transition rates Ar (s- 1), and weighted oscillator strengths (gf) for the
strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Ar atom
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.736 6.49E-01 1.70E+07 7140.95
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.722 7.01E-01 1.00E+07 7199.82
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 1.688 1.01E+00 1.79E+07 7344.29
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 1 0 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 1 1.64 8.57E-02 1.00E+07 7562.38
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 3 1.623 6.25E-01 1.43E+07 7639.62
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p1/2 1 3 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 1.623 1.19E+00 1.94E+07 7641.59
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 6 1.621 1.79E+00 1.86E+07 7650.18
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 2 1 6 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 6 1.621 1.63E+00 1.43E+07 7651.04
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 3d3/2 3 d5/25 0 1 1.62 2.83E-01 1.07E+07 7654.25
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 1.62 1.39E+00 1.44E+07 7655.71
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 4 1 7 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 6 1.614 2.98E+00 2.25E+07 7680.66
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 2 1 6 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 5 1.614 2.47E+00 2.14E+07 7684.39
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 5 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.608 2.11E+00 2.16E+07 7711.49
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 4 3 d5/22 0 4 1.589 8.80E-01 1.07E+07 7802.88
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4d5/2 0 3 1.537 1.02E+00 1.49E+07 8068.13
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 1 2 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4d5/2 0 3 1.527 5.35E-01 1.08E+07 8121.86
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 4 1.505 1.40E+00 1.96E+07 8237.07
3 d3/23 3 d5/2
2 4p3/2 1 2 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.455 6.45E-01 1.18E+07 8524.73
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p1/2 1 0 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 1 1.453 1.48E-01 1.36E+07 8531.61
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 1.43 6.97E-01 2.06E+07 8668.53
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4p3/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 1.415 1.32E+00 1.04E+07 8762.59
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f7/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 0 1.259 6.70E-01 1.54E+07 9846.61
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 0 1.245 1.03E+00 2.31E+07 9957.1
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f5/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 1.124 2.21E+00 1.10E+07 11033.66
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 4 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 3 1.122 2.21E+00 1.34E+07 11049.22
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f5/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 1.121 3.24E+00 1.61E+07 11064.41
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 5f7/2 1 3 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 2 1.12 1.41E+00 1.10E+07 11071.54
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 6f7/2 1 1 3 d3/22 3 d5/2
4 0 0 1.119 1.23E+00 2.23E+07 11077.61
3 d3/22 3 d5/2
3 4f5/2 1 5 3 d3/23 3 d5/2
3 0 4 0.976 2.75E+00 1.03E+07 12705.82
Table 3: Energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ) in Å, transition rates
(Ar) in s- 1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the strongest multipole E2, E3,
M1, M2, M3 transitions of Ar atom
Ar :E2 transitions
upper state
P (up)
J (up)
Lower state
P (lower)
J (lower)
∆E (eV)
gf Ar (s-1)
λ ( Å)
3s1/2 5d5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.393 3.17E-07 2.89E+03 382.8
3s1/2 4d5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.124 1.42E-06 1.28E+04 386
252 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table 3: (Continued): Energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ) in Å,
transition rates (Ar) in s- 1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the strongest
multipole E2, E3, M1, M2, M3 transitions of Ar atom
3s1/2 5f5/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.442 1.59E-10 1.03E+00 382.22
3p1/2 6d5/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.189 2.17E-09 2.70E+00 873.9
3p1/2 6g7/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.179 1.85E-08 2.31E+01 874.51
3p1/2 5g7/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.059 3.90E-09 4.77E+00 882
3p3/23 6d5/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.02 1.76E-09 2.14E+00 884.46
3p3/23 6d3/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.007 2.71E-09 3.30E+00 885.24
3p3/23 6g7/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.997 1.38E-08 1.68E+01 885.88
3p3/23 6g9/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.996 2.46E-08 2.98E+01 885.95
3p3/23 5g7/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.877 2.94E-09 3.51E+00 893.55
3p3/23 5g9/2 1 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.876 5.18E-09 6.19E+00 893.66
3p1/2 6f5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.224 2.36E-06 4.14E+03 871.77
3p3/23 6f5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.042 2.44E-06 4.17E+03 883.07
3p3/23 6f7/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.04 2.79E-06 4.77E+03 883.2
3p1/2 5f5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.03 1.98E-06 3.39E+03 883.81
3p1/2 4f5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.882 1.81E-06 3.03E+03 893.26
3p3/23 5f5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.849 1.99E-06 3.30E+03 895.4
3p1/2 6p3/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.848 3.36E-05 5.59E+04 895.43
3p3/23 5f7/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.845 2.43E-06 4.03E+03 895.64
3p3/23 4f5/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.7 1.86E-06 3.03E+03 905.13
3p3/23 4f7/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.693 2.35E-06 3.82E+03 905.59
3p3/23 6p3/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.675 2.38E-05 3.86E+04 906.78
3p3/23 6p1/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.664 3.93E-05 6.37E+04 907.51
3p1/2 5p3/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.484 7.09E-06 1.12E+04 919.61
3p3/23 5p3/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.326 5.43E-06 8.38E+03 930.5
3p3/23 5p1/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.295 6.76E-06 1.04E+04 932.71
Ar :E3 transitions
Upper state
P (up)
J (up)
Lower state
P (lower)
J (lower)
∆E (eV) gf Ar(s-1) λ ( Å)
Ar :M1 transitions
upper state
P (up)
J (up)
Lower state
P (lower)
J (lower) ∆E (eV) gf Ar(s-1) λ ( Å)
3s1/2 6s1/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.089 8.11E-14 1.21E-03 386.43
3p1/2 6p3/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.845 4.03E-12 1.12E-02 895.6
3p3/23 6p1/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.672 1.55E-12 4.18E-03 906.94
3p3/23 6p3/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.642 2.19E-12 5.90E-03 908.97
3p1/2 5p3/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.484 9.44E-12 2.48E-02 919.63
3p1/2 5p1/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.475 2.03E-12 5.33E-03 920.19
3p3/23 5p1/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.317 3.74E-12 9.59E-03 931.12
3p3/23 5p3/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.243 2.86E-12 7.26E-03 936.34
3p1/2 4p1/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 12.607 1.15E-11 2.64E-02 983.57
3p1/2 4p3/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 12.571 3.72E-11 8.51E-02 986.44
3p3/23 4p1/2 0 1 3p3/2
4 0 0 12.422 9.13E-12 2.04E-02 998.26 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 0 1 3p3/24 0 0 12.154 2.41E-12 5.15E-03 1020.30
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 253
Table 3: (Continued): Energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ) in Å,
transition rates (Ar) in s- 1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the strongest
multipole E2, E3, M1, M2, M3 transitions of Ar atom
Ar :M2 transitions
upper state P (up)
J (up)
Lower state
P (lower)
J (lower)
∆E (eV) gf Ar(s-1) λ ( Å)
3s1/2 6p3/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.277 3.52E-12 3.19E-02 384.17
3s1/2 5p3/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 31.878 3.12E-12 2.75E-02 388.98
3s1/2 4p3/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 30.814 3.84E-12 3.16E-02 402.42
3p1/2 6d5/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.187 7.90E-13 1.38E-03 874.02
3p3/23 6d5/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.015 3.06E-12 5.22E-03 884.77
3p3/23 6d3/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.01 2.46E-12 4.19E-03 885.09
3p1/2 5d5/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.963 1.24E-12 2.10E-03 888.06
3p1/2 4d3/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.872 7.78E-13 1.30E-03 893.87
3p1/2 4d5/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.813 1.25E-12 2.07E-03 897.72
3p3/23 5d3/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.795 4.68E-12 7.72E-03 898.86
3p3/23 5d5/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.786 6.02E-12 9.93E-03 899.45
3p3/23 4d5/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.668 1.78E-11 2.89E-02 907.25
3p3/23 4d3/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.645 4.86E-12 7.85E-03 908.75
3p3/23 6s1/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.471 1.24E-12 1.95E-03 920.48
3p3/23 4s1/2 1 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 10.876 1.16E-11 1.19E-02 1140.1
Ar: M3 transitions
upper state
P (up)
J (up)
Lower state
P (lower)
J (lower)
∆E (eV) gf Ar(s-1) λ ( Å)
3s1/2 5d5/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.382 1.70E-16 1.10E-06 382.92
3s1/2 4d5/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.106 7.49E-16 4.78E-06 386.22
3p1/2 6f7/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.224 2.18E-16 2.73E-07 871.79
3p3/23 6f5/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.043 9.44E-17 1.15E-07 883.01
3p3/23 6f7/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.042 6.34E-16 7.75E-07 883.07
3p1/2 5f7/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 14.03 1.81E-16 2.21E-07 883.82
3p1/2 4f7/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.882 1.38E-16 1.65E-07 893.27
3p3/23 5f7/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.848 5.33E-16 6.33E-07 895.41
3p3/23 4f7/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.7 5.00E-16 5.82E-07 905.14
3p3/23 6p3/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.657 9.31E-15 1.08E-05 907.95
3p3/23 5p3/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 13.287 1.76E-15 1.92E-06 933.27
254 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table 4: Comparison of some n=4 energy levels (eV) for Cl- like Ar
calculated by FAC code and MR-MBPT method against NIST database
Cl- like Ar
Level Relativistic Conf P J Energy(eV)- FAC MR-MBPT NIST
0 3p3/23 1 1.5 0 0 0
1 3p 1/2 1 0.5 0.17656 0.1845 0.17749
2 3p3/22 4s 1/2 0 2.5 16.01626 15.8648 16.6438
3 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4s 1/2 0 1.5 16.11333 15.9688 16.7485
4 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4s 1/2 0 0.5 16.20023 16.0402 16.8124
5 3p3/22 4s 1/2 0 1.5 16.68399 16.6230 17.14
6 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4s 1/2 0 0.5 16.81739 16.7524 17.2658
7 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4s 1/2 0 2.5 18.12026 18.0924 18.4265
8 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4s 1/2 0 1.5 18.1237 18.0957 18.4541
9 3p3/22 4p3/2 1 2.5 18.4511 18.2573 19.2229
10 3p3/22 4p 1/2 1 1.5 18.48686 18.2977 19.261
11 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p 1/2 1 0.5 18.53811 18.3428 19.3053
12 3p3/22 4p3/2 1 3.5 18.74778 18.6050 19.4945
13 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 2.5 18.79605 18.6678 19.549
14 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p 1/2 1 1.5 18.87018 18.7289 19.6103
15 4p 1/2 1 0.5 18.92014 18.7663 19.6425
16 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 2.5 19.0111 18.9140 19.68
17 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 19.11683 19.0192 19.7622
18 3p3/22 4p3/2 1 0.5 19.22763 19.1363 19.801
19 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 19.28399 19.2303 19.8671
20 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 19.33965 19.2390 19.9674
21 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 0.5 19.37414 19.2939 19.9725
22 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p 1/2 1 2.5 20.57763 20.5235 21.127
23 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 3.5 20.58491 20.5321 21.143
24 3p3/22 4s 1/2 0 0.5 20.89198 20.9772 20.7435
25 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 20.97195 20.9904 21.3517
26 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 2.5 20.97854 20.9991 21.4264
27 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p 1/2 1 1.5 21.52717 21.5439 21.3517
28 3p 1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 0.5 21.59093 21.6013 21.4264
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 255
Table (5): The calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ) in Å,
transition rates Ar(s- 1), and weighted oscillator strengths (gf) for the
strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Cl- like Ar
Cl- like Ar
E1 transitions
upper state P up J up Lower state P lower J lower ∆E (eV) gf Ar λ (Å)
3p3/22 6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 29.222 1.48E-02 9.16E+07 424.34
3p3/22 6d3/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 29.041 1.04E-02 9.55E+07 426.99
3p3/22 6s1/2 0 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 28.002 4.60E-03 7.82E+07 442.82
3p3/22 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 26.755 1.77E-02 1.38E+08 463.47
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 26.74 1.59E-01 8.24E+08 463.73
3p3/22 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.578 1.13E-01 8.64E+08 466.54
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.505 2.29E-02 3.48E+08 467.84
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.501 3.86E-02 2.93E+08 467.91
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.49 3.65E-02 1.85E+08 468.1
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.49 4.93E-03 7.51E+07 468.11
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.324 2.16E-02 3.24E+08 471.06
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.32 2.22E-02 1.67E+08 471.13
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.309 9.83E-03 7.38E+07 471.33
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.295 6.24E-03 9.37E+07 471.58
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6s1/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 25.23 2.45E-02 1.13E+08 491.48
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6s1/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 25.049 1.49E-02 1.01E+08 495.04
6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.86 8.14E-02 3.63E+08 498.8
3p3/22 6g7/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 24.743 7.61E-03 5.05E+07 501.15
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.743 3.19E-02 2.12E+08 501.15
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.72 5.61E-02 3.71E+08 501.62
6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.709 2.69E-02 1.19E+08 501.84
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.697 5.67E-03 7.51E+07 502.08
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.528 9.86E-03 1.29E+08 505.55
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.477 8.45E-02 1.09E+09 506.59
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.369 5.82E-01 3.75E+09 508.85
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 24.333 6.96E-01 2.98E+09 509.59
256 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table (5): (Continued): The calculated energy difference ∆E (eV),
wavelengths (λ) in Å, transition rates Ar(s- 1), and weighted oscillator
strengths (gf) for the strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Cl- like Ar
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.262 2.28E-01 2.91E+09 511.09
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.222 5.10E-01 3.25E+09 511.94
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.112 1.84E-01 2.32E+09 514.27
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.935 6.79E-02 8.44E+08 518.06
6s1/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 23.578 6.79E-03 8.19E+07 525.92
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6s1/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 23.458 2.10E-02 1.26E+08 528.62
6s1/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.396 1.19E-02 1.41E+08 530
3p3/22 6s1/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.366 2.48E-02 1.47E+08 530.69
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6s1/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.312 5.70E-03 6.71E+07 531.9
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 22.802 5.24E-01 1.97E+09 543.82
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 22.753 2.70E-02 1.52E+08 544.99
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 22.576 2.65E-01 1.46E+09 549.26
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 22.529 1.41E-01 7.77E+08 550.4
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 22.409 2.24E-02 2.44E+08 553.35
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 22.233 3.30E-02 3.54E+08 557.74
3p3/22 4s1/2 0 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 20.892 8.08E-02 7.65E+08 593.53
3p3/22 4s1/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 20.715 4.97E-02 4.63E+08 598.59
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4s1/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 18.124 4.07E-01 9.67E+08 684.19
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4s1/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 18.12 2.96E-02 1.06E+08 684.32
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4s1/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 17.947 2.47E-01 8.62E+08 690.92
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4s1/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 16.817 1.39E-01 8.56E+08 737.33
3p3/22 4s1/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 16.684 6.79E-01 2.05E+09 743.23
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4s1/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 16.641 2.58E-01 1.55E+09 745.16
3p3/22 4s1/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 16.507 1.16E-01 3.42E+08 751.18
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 7/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 4.5 10.733 1.26E+00 5.23E+08 1155.29
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 5/2 1 1.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 2.5 10.427 8.68E-01 1.02E+09 1189.23
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 5/2 1 2.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 2.5 10.426 1.30E+00 1.02E+09 1189.31
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 7/2 1 3.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 2.5 10.425 1.74E+00 1.02E+09 1189.43
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 257
Table (5): (Continued): The calculated energy difference ∆E (eV),
wavelengths (λ) in Å, transition rates Ar(s- 1), and weighted oscillator
strengths (gf) for the strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Cl- like Ar
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 4.5 9.581 1.35E+00 4.49E+08 1294.24
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 5/2 1 4.5 3d 3/2 3d 5/2 4 0 3.5 9.578 1.09E+00 4.35E+08 1294.64
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 7/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 6.5 9.484 1.77E+00 4.94E+08 1307.5
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 5/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 5.5 9.479 1.51E+00 4.92E+08 1308.15
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 7/2 1 7.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 6.5 9.463 2.03E+00 4.92E+08 1310.33
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 5/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 5.5 9.459 1.77E+00 4.91E+08 1310.97
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 5/2 1 2.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 2.5 9.118 1.66E+00 9.99E+08 1359.97
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 3.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 2.5 9.116 2.21E+00 9.97E+08 1360.18
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 7/2 1 7.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 6.5 8.758 2.26E+00 4.70E+08 1415.77
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 7/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 5.5 8.752 1.96E+00 4.65E+08 1416.87
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 5/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 4.5 8.685 1.77E+00 4.82E+08 1427.74
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 5/2 1 0.5 3d 3/23 3d 5/2
2 0 0.5 8.601 2.93E-01 4.70E+08 1441.64
3d 3/23 3d 5/2 5f 7/2 1 1.5 3d 3/2
3 3d 5/2 2 0 0.5 8.601 5.84E-01 4.69E+08 1441.67
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 3.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 4.5 8.591 1.04E+00 4.16E+08 1443.43
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 5/2 1 4.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 5.5 8.59 1.35E+00 4.33E+08 1443.52
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 5/2 1 2.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 3.5 8.588 7.78E-01 4.15E+08 1443.88
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 5/2 1 2.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 1.5 8.586 8.86E-01 4.72E+08 1444.22
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 1.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 2.5 8.584 5.74E-01 4.59E+08 1444.54
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 7/2 1 4.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 3.5 8.575 1.51E+00 4.81E+08 1446.04
3d 5/2 4 5f 7/2 1 3.5 3d 5/2 0 2.5 8.573 1.28E+00 5.12E+08 1446.36
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 7/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 5.5 8.546 1.57E+00 4.15E+08 1451.04
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 7/2 1 4.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 3.5 8.45 1.53E+00 4.76E+08 1467.52
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 7/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2 3d 5/2 4 0 4.5 8.328 1.93E+00 4.84E+08 1488.9
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 5f 7/2 1 4.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 3.5 8.328 1.59E+00 4.78E+08 1489.03
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 6.5 8.299 2.21E+00 4.71E+08 1494.09
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 5/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 5.5 8.295 1.89E+00 4.70E+08 1494.82
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 7.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 6.5 8.28 2.82E+00 5.24E+08 1497.67
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 5/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 5.5 8.276 2.47E+00 5.24E+08 1498.35
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 5/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 5.5 8.205 2.23E+00 4.66E+08 1511.2
258 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table (5): (Continued): The calculated energy difference ∆E (eV),
wavelengths (λ) in Å, transition rates Ar(s- 1), and weighted oscillator
strengths (gf) for the strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Cl- like Ar
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 5/2 1 2.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 1.5 7.64 1.01E+00 4.28E+08 1623.02
3d 5/2 4 4f 7/2 1 3.5 3d 5/2 5 0 2.5 7.631 1.44E+00 4.54E+08 1624.87
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 7/2 1 7.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 6.5 7.59 2.78E+00 4.35E+08 1633.75
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 5.5 7.584 2.41E+00 4.30E+08 1635.1
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 7/2 1 0.5 3d 3/2 3d 5/2 4 0 1.5 7.388 4.12E-01 4.88E+08 1678.35
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 5/2 1 5.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 4.5 7.056 2.33E+00 4.20E+08 1757.49
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 5/2 1 6.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 5.5 7.054 2.88E+00 4.44E+08 1757.75
3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
2 4f 7/2 1 4.5 3d 3/2 2 3d 5/2
3 0 3.5 7.052 1.88E+00 4.06E+08 1758.3
3d 3/23 3d 5/2 4f 7/2 1 3.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 2.5 7.047 1.52E+00 4.08E+08 1759.64
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 5/2 1 3.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 2.5 6.945 2.17E+00 5.66E+08 1785.44
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 5f 7/2 1 2.5 3d 3/2 3d 5/2 4 0 1.5 6.943 1.50E+00 5.24E+08 1785.87
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 5/2 1 1.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 2.5 6.574 1.05E+00 4.92E+08 1886.09
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 7/2 1 0.5 3d 3/2 3d 5/2 4 0 1.5 6.572 5.83E-01 5.46E+08 1886.79
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 5/2 1 3.5 3d 3/2
2 3d 5/23 0 2.5 6.128 2.62E+00 5.35E+08 2023.62
3d 3/2 3d 5/23 4f 7/2 1 2.5 3d 3/2 3d 5/2 4 0 1.5 6.125 1.83E+00 4.98E+08 2024.4
3p3/22 6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 29.222 1.48E-02 9.16E+07 424.34
3p3/22 6d3/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 29.041 1.04E-02 9.55E+07 426.99
3p3/22 6s1/2 0 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 28.002 4.60E-03 7.82E+07 442.82
3p3/22 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 26.755 1.77E-02 1.38E+08 463.47
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 26.74 1.59E-01 8.24E+08 463.73
3p3/22 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.578 1.13E-01 8.64E+08 466.54
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.505 2.29E-02 3.48E+08 467.84
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.501 3.86E-02 2.93E+08 467.91
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.49 3.65E-02 1.85E+08 468.1
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.49 4.93E-03 7.51E+07 468.11
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.324 2.16E-02 3.24E+08 471.06
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.32 2.22E-02 1.67E+08 471.13
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.309 9.83E-03 7.38E+07 471.33
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.295 6.24E-03 9.37E+07 471.58
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 259
Table (5): (Continued): The calculated energy difference ∆E (eV),
wavelengths (λ) in Å, transition rates Ar(s- 1), and weighted oscillator
strengths (gf) for the strongest electric dipole E1 transitions of Cl- like Ar 3p1/2
3p3/23 6s1/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 25.23 2.45E-02 1.13E+08 491.48
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6s1/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 25.049 1.49E-02 1.01E+08 495.04
6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.86 8.14E-02 3.63E+08 498.8
3p3/22 6g7/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 24.743 7.61E-03 5.05E+07 501.15
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.743 3.19E-02 2.12E+08 501.15
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.72 5.61E-02 3.71E+08 501.62
6d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.709 2.69E-02 1.19E+08 501.84
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.697 5.67E-03 7.51E+07 502.08
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6d3/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.528 9.86E-03 1.29E+08 505.55
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.477 8.45E-02 1.09E+09 506.59
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.369 5.82E-01 3.75E+09 508.85
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 24.333 6.96E-01 2.98E+09 509.59
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.262 2.28E-01 2.91E+09 511.09
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.222 5.10E-01 3.25E+09 511.94
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.112 1.84E-01 2.32E+09 514.27
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.935 6.79E-02 8.44E+08 518.06
6s1/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 23.578 6.79E-03 8.19E+07 525.92
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6s1/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 23.458 2.10E-02 1.26E+08 528.62
6s1/2 0 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.396 1.19E-02 1.41E+08 530
3p3/22 6s1/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.366 2.48E-02 1.47E+08 530.69
Table (6): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths (λ) in Å,
transition rates (Ar) in s-1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the strongest
multi- pole E2, E3, M1, M2, M3 transitions of Cl- like Ar
Cl- like Ar
E2 transitions
upper state P up J up Lower state
P lower
J lower
∆E (eV)
gf Ar λ (Å)
3s1/2 6d5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.638 4.03E-07 3.73E+03 379.925
3s1/2 5 d
5/2 0 2 3p3/24 0 0 32.393 6.70E-07 6.10E+03 382.800
260 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table (6): (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths
(λ) in Å, transition rates (Ar) in s-1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the
strongest multi- pole E2, E3, M1, M2, M3 transitions of Cl- like Ar
3s1/2 4d5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.124 1.24E-06 1.11E+04 386.004
3s1/2 4d5/2 0 2 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.124 1.24E-06 1.11E+04 386.004
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6f7/2 1 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.689 4.92E-07 2.54E+03 464.613
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6f5/2 1 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.673 3.44E-07 5.31E+03 464.881
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6f7/2 1 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.673 3.27E-07 2.52E+03 464.883
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6f7/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.492 3.64E-07 2.77E+03 468.062
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p3/2 1 3.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 25.660 6.36E-07 2.27E+03 483.240
3p3/22 6f7/2 1 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 24.806 6.78E-07 3.02E+03 499.886
3p3/22 6f7/2 1 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 24.799 1.26E-06 4.22E+03 500.019
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6f7/2 1 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.740 4.82E-07 2.13E+03 501.217
3p3/22 6p1/2 1 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.802 5.13E-07 2.10E+03 520.974
3p3/22 4p1/2 1 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.608 7.60E-07 9.18E+03 525.236
3p3/22 4f7/2 1 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.007 3.22E-06 9.23E+03 538.969
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 3.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 20.585 5.88E-06 1.35E+04 602.383
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p1/2 1 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 20.401 3.72E-06 1.12E+04 607.811
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 19.374 9.53E-07 7.76E+03 640.028
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 19.163 2.41E-06 9.62E+03 647.077
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 19.117 3.71E-06 1.47E+04 648.643
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 19.011 6.55E-06 1.71E+04 652.251
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 18.940 1.86E-06 7.24E+03 654.689
E3 transitions
upper state P up J up Lower state
P lower
J lower
∆E (eV)
gf Ar λ (Å)
3p3/22 6g9/2 0 4.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 29.403 3.75E-11 1.41E-01 421.727
3p3/22 6g7/2 0 3.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 29.222 2.41E-11 1.12E-01 424.342
3p3/22 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 26.755 2.97E-12 2.30E-02 463.467
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 26.740 1.99E-12 1.03E-02 463.725
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6g7/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.630 1.55E-11 7.94E-02 465.647
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6g9/2 0 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.621 1.86E-11 9.51E-02 465.799
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6g7/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.621 2.88E-11 2.21E-01 465.799
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.563 2.94E-12 1.50E-02 466.808
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 261
Table (6): (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths
(λ) in Å, transition rates (Ar) in s-1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the
strongest multi- pole E2, E3, M1, M2, M3 transitions of Cl- like Ar
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6g7/2 0 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.448 1.34E-11 6.79E-02 468.837
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6g9/2 0 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 26.440 2.66E-11 1.35E-01 468.992
3p3/22 6g9/2 0 4.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 24.735 2.33E-11 6.18E-02 501.308
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6g9/2 0 3.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 24.679 1.91E-11 6.30E-02 502.462
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 4.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 23.713 1.05E-11 2.57E-02 522.920
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d3/2 0 3.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.532 6.46E-12 1.94E-02 526.938
3p3/22 4d3/2
1 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 22.753 3.80E-12 2.13E-02 544.993
3p3/22 4d3/2
2 0 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 22.625 3.63E-12 1.34E-02 548.066
3p3/22 4d3/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 22.302 4.00E-12 1.44E-02 556.004
3p3/22 4d3/2 0 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 22.191 5.71E-12 1.53E-02 558.785
M1 transitions
upper state P up J up Lower state
P lower
J lower
∆E (eV)
gf Ar λ (Å)
3p3/22 6p1/2 1 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 28.462 4.79E-12 8.42E-02 436.00
3p3/22 6p3/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 28.282 4.55E-12 3.95E-02 438.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p3/2 1 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 25.720 8.22E-12 3.93E-02 482.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p1/2 1 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 25.720 9.62E-12 6.90E-02 482.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p1/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 25.539 6.73E-12 4.76E-02 486.00
3p3/22 6p3/2 1 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.937 9.48E-12 5.90E-02 518.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6s1/2 1 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 23.899 9.27E-12 3.83E-02 519.00
3p3/22 6p3/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.773 5.49E-12 3.37E-02 522.00
3p3/22 6p1/2 1 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.763 1.35E-11 8.25E-02 522.00
6s1/2 1 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.727 4.93E-12 6.02E-02 523.00
3p3/22 4p1/2 1 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.609 3.60E-11 4.35E-01 525.00
3p3/22 4p3/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.407 4.09E-11 2.43E-01 530.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 20.979 6.46E-11 2.05E-01 591.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 20.972 1.04E-10 4.97E-01 591.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 20.795 3.08E-11 1.45E-01 596.00
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4p3/2 1 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 19.284 1.09E-10 4.41E-01 643.00
3p3/22 4p1/2 1 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 18.796 1.20E-10 3.08E-01 660.00
3p3/22 4p1/2 1 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 18.694 3.75E-11 1.42E-01 663.00
262 Feras Afaneh et al.
Table (6): (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths
(λ) in Å, transition rates (Ar) in s-1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the
strongest multi- pole E2, E3, M1, M2, M3 transitions of Cl- like Ar
3p3/22 4p1/2 1 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 18.487 4.64E-11 1.72E-01 671.00
3p3/22 4p1/2 1 0.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 18.362 2.76E-11 2.02E-01 675.00
M2 transitions
upper state P up J up Lower state
P lower
J lower
∆E (eV)
gf Ar λ (Å)
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 26.740 1.95E-10 1.01E+00 463.72
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d3/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.439 3.15E-11 4.09E-01 507.39
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.398 9.29E-11 6.00E-01 508.24
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d3/2 0 1.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.369 7.48E-11 4.82E-01 508.84
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 24.112 9.10E-11 1.15E+00 514.27
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 22.625 1.33E-10 4.91E-01 548.07
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 22.576 7.13E-11 3.94E-01 549.26
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 0.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 22.409 1.28E-10 1.39E+00 553.35
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 1.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 22.353 8.17E-11 4.43E-01 554.74
3p3/22 4d5/2 0 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 21.599 3.52E-10 8.90E-01 574.10
M3 transitions
upper state P up J up Lower state
P lower
J lower
∆E (eV)
gf Ar λ (Å)
3s1/2 5 d
5/2 0 3 3p3/24 0 0 32.382 1.69E-16 1.10E-06 382.93
3s1/2 4d5/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.106 7.48E-16 4.78E-06 386.22
3s1/2 4d5/2 0 3 3p3/2
4 0 0 32.106 7.48E-16 4.78E-06 386.22
3p3/22 6f7/2 1 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 29.465 4.16E-15 1.96E-05 420.84
3p3/22 6f7/2 1 3.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 29.284 1.30E-15 6.07E-06 423.44
3p3/22 6p3/2 1 1.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 28.463 1.02E-14 8.95E-05 435.65
3p3/22 4f7/2 1 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 27.691 4.20E-16 1.75E-06 447.80
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6f7/2 1 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.689 8.58E-15 4.42E-05 464.61
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6h11/2 1 3.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 26.626 2.17E-15 8.33E-06 465.71
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p3/2 1 2.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 25.72 2.33E-15 1.11E-05 482.12
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p3/2 1 3.5 3p3/23 1 1.5 25.66 4.57E-15 1.63E-05 483.24
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p3/2 1 3.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 25.479 7.45E-15 2.62E-05 486.68
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 263
Table (6): (Continued): Calculated energy difference ∆E (eV), wavelengths
(λ) in Å, transition rates (Ar) in s-1, and oscillator strength (gf) for the
strongest multi- pole E2, E3, M1, M2, M3 transitions of Cl- like Ar
3p3/22 6p3/2 1 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 23.775 3.34E-15 1.02E-05 521.56
3p1/2 3p3/2
3 6p3/2 1 2.5 3p1/2 1 0.5 23.718 1.81E-15 7.36E-06 522.81
3p3/22 4p3/2 1 3.5 3p3/2
3 1 1.5 18.748 7.00E-16 1.33E-06 661.40
References
[1] Y. Zou and C. F. Fischer, Multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree Fock
calculations of the forbidden transitions between 3s2 1S0, 3s 3p 3P0,1,2, 1P1
states for Mg-like ions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and
Optical Physics, 34 (2001), no. 5, 915–931.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/34/5/317
[2] E. Trabert, P. Beiersdorfer, S. B. Utter, G. V. Brown, H. Chen, C. L. Harris,
P. A. Neill, D. W. Savin and A. J. Smith, Experimental M1 Transition Rates
of Coronal Lines From Ar X, Ar Xiv, And Ar Xv, The Astrophysical
Journal, 541 (2000), 506-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/309427
[3] C. Z Dong, S. Fritzsche, B. Fricke and W-D Sepp, Ab-initio Calculations
for Forbidden M1 Transitions in Ar13+ and Ar14+ Ions, Physica Scripta, T92
(2001), 294-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1238/physica.topical.092a00294
[4] I. Bowen, Forbidden lines, Reviews of Modern Physics, 8 (1936), no. 2, 55–
81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.8.55
[5] E. Träbert, Atomic lifetime measurements with ion traps of any sizes,
Physica Scripta, 61 (2000), 257–286.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1238/physica.regular.061a00257
[6] E. Träbert and G. Gwinner, (M1+E2) decay rate in Ar2+ ions measured at a
heavy-ion storage ring, Physical Review A, 65 (2001), 014501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.65.014501
[7] M. Burger, M. Skocic, M. Gavrilov, S. Bukvic, and S. Djenize,
Experimental transition probabilities in the Ar III and Ar IV UV spectra,
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer, 113 (2012),
1662-1688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.04.011
[8] M. Celik, Spectral measurements of inductively coupled and helicon
discharge modes of a laboratory argon plasma source, Spectrochimica Acta
264 Feras Afaneh et al.
Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 66 (2011), 149–155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2011.01.003
[9] G. Lotito, T. Nelis, P. Guillot, and D. Gunther, Characterization of argon
metastable species as function of time, space, and current of a pulsed dc
glow discharge, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 66
(2011), 619–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2011.06.009
[10] Q. L. Ma, V. Motto-Ros, W. Q. Lei et al., Temporal and spatial dynamics of
laser-induced aluminum plasma in argon background at atmospheric
pressure: interplay with the ambient gas, Spectrochimica Acta Part B:
Atomic Spectroscopy, 65 (2010), 896–907.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2010.08.005
[11] G. Kuhn, F. Konemann, and M. Kock, The role of Ar III in quantitative
spectroscopy on hot argon plasmas, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy
and Radiative Transfer, 105 (2007), 102–110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2006.09.015
[12] W. B. Bridges and A. N. Chester, Visible and UV laser oscillation at 118
wavelengths in ionized neon, argon, krypton, xenon, oxygen and other
gases, Applied Optics, 4 (1965), 573–580.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.4.000573
[13] E. B. Saloman, Energy Levels and Observed Spectral Lines of Ionized
Argon, Ar II through Ar XVIII, Journal of Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 39
(2010), 033101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3337661
[14] http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/levels_form.html
[15] S. J. Czyak and T. K. Krueger, Forbidden transition probabilities for some
P, S, Cl, and Ar ions, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,
126 (1963), 177–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/126.2.177
[16] A. M. Naqvi, Mutual Magnetic Interaction in P-Electron Configurations,
Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, 1951.
[17] I. S. Bowen, Wave lengths of forbidden nebular lines II, The Astrophysical
Journal, 132 (1960), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/146893
[18] I. I. Bowen, Wave lengths of forbidden nebular lines, The Astrophysical
Journal, 121 (1955), 306–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/145989
[19] D. M. Kelly and J. H. Lacy, Accurate wave numbers for mid infrared fine-
structure lines, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 454 (1995), L161–L164.
Relativistic configuration interaction calculations of multi-pole … 265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/309795
[20] C. Mendoza and C. J. Zeippen, Transition probabilities for forbidden lines
in the 3p4 configuration III, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical
Society, 202 (1983), 981–986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/202.4.981
[21] E. Träbert, Level lifetimes dominated by electric-dipole forbidden decay
rates in the ground configuration of doubly charged rare gas ions (Ne2+,
Ar2+, Kr2+ and Xe2+), Physica Scripta, 85 (2012), 048101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/85/04/048101
[22] Leyla Özdemir, Selda Kabakçi and Ilker Armagan, Forbidden Transitions in
the Ground State Configuration of Doubly Ionized Argon, Journal of
Atomic and Molecular Physics, 2014 (2014), 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/798398
[23] F. R. T. Luna, F. Bredice, G. H. Cavalcanti and A. G. Trigueiros, Weighted
oscillator strengths and lifetimes for the Ar III spectrum, Journal of
Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 69 (2001), 171–188.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4073(00)00075-3
[24] Sultana N. Nahar Transition Probabilities for Dipole Allowed Fine Structure
Transitions in Si-like Ions: Si I, S III, Ar V and Ca VII, Physica Scripta, 48
(1993), 297-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/48/3/008
[25] C. A. Ramsbottom, K. L. Belli and F. P. Keenan, Effective collision
strengths for fine-structure forbidden transitions among the 3s23p3 levels of
Ar IV, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 284 (1997) 754-760.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/284.3.754
[26] C. Dong, S. Fritzsche, B. Fricke and W. Sepp, Ab-initio Calculations for
Forbidden M1 Transitions in Ar13+ and Ar14+ Ions, Phys. Scripta, T92
(2001), 294-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1238/physica.topical.092a00294
[27] L. Minnhagen, Spectrum and the Energy Levels of Neutral Argon, Ar I, J.
Opt. Soc. Am., 63 (1973), 1185–1198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josa.63.001185
[28] M. F. Gu, The flexible atomic code, Can. J. Phys., 86 (2008), 675-689.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/p07-197
[29] S. Hamasha and R. Alshaiub, Constructing theoretical M-shell spectra for
Mg-like Au through Cl-like Au ions in gold plasma diagnostics, Physica
Scripta, 86 (2012), 065302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/86/06/065302
266 Feras Afaneh et al.
[30] H. L. Zhang, D. H. Sampson, A. K. Mohanty, Fully relativistic and
quasirelativistic distorted-wave methods for calculating collision strengths
for highly charged ions, Phys. Rev. A, 40 (1989), 616-632.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.40.616
[31] J. Vilkas, Y. Ishikawa, E. Trabert, relativistic multireference many-body
perturbation theory calculations on Au64+-Au69+ ions, European Journal of
Physics D, 41 (2007), 77-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2006-00214-0
[32] M. F. Gu, R. Gupta, J. Peterson, M. Sako, S. M. Kahn, Capella Corona
Revisited: A Combined View from XMM-Newton RGS and Chandra
HETGS and LETGS, The Astrophysical Journal, 649 (2006), 979-991.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/506602
[33] J. Clementson, P. Beiersdorfer, M. F. Gu, X-ray spectroscopy of E2 and M3
transitions in Ni-like W, Physical Review A, 81 (2010), 012505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.81.012505
[34] Y. Podpaly, J. Clementson, P. Beiersdorfer, J. Williamson, G. Brown, M. F.
Gu, Spectroscopy of 2s1/2 – 2p3/2 transitions in W65+ through W71+ , Physical
Review A, 80 (2009), 052504.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.80.052504
[35] J. Clementson, P. Beiersdorfer, G. Brown, M. F. Gu, Spectroscopy of M-
shell x-ray transitions in Zn-like through Co-like W, Physica Scripta, 81
(2010), 015301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/81/01/015301
[36] M. J. Vilkas, Y. Ishikawa, E. Träbert, Relativistic Many-Body Perturbation
Calculations of Boron-Like Silicon, Si X, Physica Scripta, 72 (2005), 181-
192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1238/physica.regular.072a00181
[37] J. A. Santana, Y. Ishikawa, E. Träbert, Multireference Møller–Plesset
perturbation theory results on levels and transition rates in Al-like ions of
iron group elements, Physica Scripta, 79 (2009), 065301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/79/06/065301
Received: April 12, 2016; Published: May 19, 2016