Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Recent Developments of the Morita-Baylis-Hillman Reaction
Erin StacheDecember 6, 20103rd Year Seminar
EWG CatalystX
R2R1
X = O, NR
! EWGR2
R1
XH
Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanarayana, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811-891.Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, B. S.; Badsara, S. S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5447-5674.
Origins of the Morita-Baylis-Hillman (MBH) Reaction
Me H
OCO2Et
NN
Morita 1968
CO2Et
HO Me
93% conversion
Baylis and Hillman 1972
5 mol %
neat, 7d, 23 °C
Morita, K.; Kobayashi, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1968, 42, 2732.Baylis, A. B.; Hillman, M. E. D. German patent 2155113, 1972.
H Me
OCO2Me
CO2Me
HO MePCy3, 0.6 mol %
dioxane, 125 °C, 2h
23% conversion
DABCO
Features of the MBH Reaction
• 2 component coupling to form carbon-carbon bonds
EWG CatalystX
R2R1
X = O, NR
! EWGR2
R1
XH
• activated alkene component
• electrophiles are typically carbonyl components, but can also be Michael acceptors
• catalysts consist of trialkyl amines or trialkyl, -aryl phosphines, although some Lewis acids are used in conjunction
Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanarayana, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811-891.Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, B. S.; Badsara, S. S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5447-5674.
CO2R COR CN CONR2 SO2RX
O
n
X = CH2, O, S
O
R2RR2 = H or C
NR
R2Raza-MBH
EWG
Complications Associated with MBH
• Very slow reaction rates
• Reactive substrates lead to dimerized products
CO2Me DABCO
neat, 23 °C, 6 d
O
PhCO2Me
Ph
OH
89%
Caubere, P.; Fort, Y.; Berthe, M. C. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6371-6384.Shi, M.; Ma, G.-N.; Jiang, J.-J.; Wei, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5496-5514.
COPh DABCO
DMF, 20 °C60-70 h
O
p-NO2Ph
OH
p-NO2PhCOPh
COPh
COPh COPh
76%15%
• No traditional MBH product observed
• More electron rich aromatic aldehydes less reactive
Synthetic Challenges Associated with MBH• Asymmetric Induction
• Esoteric substrates give high selectivity
• Previous attempts with chiral amines, aldehydes, and acrylates unsuccessful
SO
O
N
OMeCHO, DABCO
CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 12 h
O
O
O
MeMe85%, 99% ee
Leahy, J. W.; Brzezinski, L. J.; Rafel, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4317-4318Fráter, G.; Roth, F.; Gygax, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1045-1048.
• Intramolecular MBH
CO2Et
OMe PBu3, 23 °C, 1 d
CO2Et
OH
75% conversion
• First example of an intramolecular MBH
• Employing different electrophiles and exploring scope of the reaction
Mechanism of the MBH Reaction
O
OR1NR3 O
OR1
R3N
O
R2HR3N O
OR1
R2O
H
O
OR1
R2HO
Initial Mechanistic Hypothesis
RDS
• RDS is addition into aldehyde, followed by an intermolecular proton transfer and catalyst expulsion
Hill, J. S.; Isaacs, N. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 41, 5007-5010. Kaye, P. T.; Bode, M. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5611-5614.Caubere, P.; Fort, Y.; Berthe, M. C. Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 6371-6384.
• 1° KIE of 1.3 observed with D-hydroxyquinuclidine in CDCl3
NN
NOH(D)
krel = 7.4krel = 1O
OR
N
OH
• stabilizing effect
Mechanistic Rationale Does Not Explain...
O
OR'
O
RH
O
OR'
OH
RDABCO (15 mol %)
neat, 23 °C
O
Ot-Bu
OH
Me
7 d, 89%
O
OMe
OH
Cl3C
20 h, 55%
O
OMe
OH
Ph
6 d, 39%
• Reaction rates dependent upon electronics and size of components
Hoffmann, H. M. R.; Rabe, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., Engl. 1983, 22, 795-796.Ikegami, S.; Yamada, Y. M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2165-2169.
O
Ph
O PBu3 (20 mol %)
THF, 23 °C, 1 h Ph
OHO
1.5 equiv 23%
• Yield quantitative with addition of 2-naphthyl alcohol (20 mol %)
Mechanism Also Does not Explain...
CO2PhN
NO
R
(cat)OH
R
CO2Ph
O
OO R
RR = Me 0% 57%
0% 95%
neat, 2-24 h, 23 °C
R = i-Pr
• Observation of dioxanone product questions proton transfer
CO2Ph NR3R3N O
OPhR3N O
OPh
Me O
R3N O
OPh
Me O
OMe
O
OPh
Me O
OHMe
OH
Me
CO2Ph
O
OO Me
Me-NR3
MeCHO
MeCHO
Perlmutter, P.; Puniani, E.; Westman, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1715-1718.
-HOPh
5 equiv
R = Me(1 equiv)
0% 52%
NN
HOMe
OO
OMe
NN
Ar H
O
Ar
OH
O
OMe
NN
Ar
OH
O
OMe
NN
O
Ar
Ar
OH
O
OMe
NN
ArO
Ar
O
O
OMe
OH
Ar RDS
Revised MBH Mechanism Supported by Data• 2nd order in aldehyde-2 equivalents in RDS
• 1st order in acrylate-1 equivalent in RDS
• 1st order in DABCO-1 equivalent in RDS
Ar H
O
McQuade, D. T.; Price, K. E.; Broadwater, S. J.; Jung, H. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 147-150.McQuade, D. T.; Price, K. E.; Broadwater, S. J.; Walker, B. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3980-3987.
NN
(D)HOMe
OO
OMe
NN
Ar H
O
Ar
OH
O
OMe
NN
Ar
OH
O
OMe
NN
O
Ar
Ar
OH
O
OMe
NN
ArO
Ar
O
O
OMe
OH
Ar RDS
Revised MBH Mechanism Supported by Data• 1° KIE of 5.2 in DMSO with p-nitrobenzaldehyde
• 1° KIE of 2.2 in CHCl3 with p-nitrobenzaldehyde
• Decrease of 1° KIE a function of !pKa of alkoxide and "-proton
Ar H
O
McQuade, D. T.; Price, K. E.; Broadwater, S. J.; Jung, H. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 147-150.McQuade, D. T.; Price, K. E.; Broadwater, S. J.; Walker, B. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3980-3987.
1° KIE
Another Look at the MBH Mechanism
HOR1
O NR3 HOR1
O
R3N
PhCHO
OR1
O
R3N
H
OPh
HO
R2
R3N
Ph
OH
EWGHO
R2
R3N
Ph
O
OR1
O
Ph
OH
OR1
O
or
Ikegami, S.; Yamada, Y. M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2165-2169.Aggarwal, V. K.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Fulford, S. Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1706-1708.
O
Ph
O PBu3 (20 mol %)
THF, 23 °C 1 h Ph
OHO
1.5 equiv 23%
• Yield quantitative with addition of 2-naphthyl alcohol (20 mol %)
RDS step 2
RDS step 3
Another Look at the MBH Mechanism
(D)HOEt
OH
OEt
O
R3N
PhCHO
OR1
O
R3N
H
OPh
HO
R2
R3N
Ph
OH
EWGHO
R2
R3N
Ph
O
OEt
O
Ph
OH
OEt
O
or
Aggarwal, V. K.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Fulford, S. Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1706-1708.
RDS step 2RDS step 3
• Competition experiment between d-ethyl acrylate/ethyl acrylate
• Suggests RDS is step 3 until 20% conversion, then RDS is step 2
N
-NR3
RDSlate
stage
RDS early stage
Complications Associated with MBH
• Very slow reaction rates
CO2Me DABCO
neat, 23 °C, 6 d
O
PhCO2Me
Ph
OH
89%
Caubere, P.; Fort, Y.; Berthe, M. C. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6371-6384.
• More electron rich aromatic aldehydes less reactive
• Without limiting substrate scope, 3 ways to enhance rate
• Find most reactive nucelophile to initiate reaction
• Use Lewis acid catalysts to promote nucleophilic addition
• Employ protic additives or solvents to assist in RDSR3N
Ph
OH
EWGHO
R2
OR
O O
R2OR
OOH
R2
DABCO (30 mol %)
La(OTf)3 (1.5 mol %)chiral diamine (3 mol %)
CH3CN, 23 °C, 10 h
Lewis Acid for Rate Enhancement of MBH
OMe
OOH
MeO55%
OPh
OOH
Ph
97%
OBn
OOH
Ph
75%
OR
OOH
Ph
R = naphthyl, 20 min88%
Chen, K.; Yang, K.-S.; Lee, W.-D.; Pan, J.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 915-919.Connell, B. T.; Bugarin, A. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4638-4641.
N N
MeMe
MeMeCO2H
HO2C
• Bulky aryl acrylates give faster reaction times by stabilization of enolate
OO
HR
TMEDA (10 mol %)MgCl2 (10 mol %)
DMAP (10 mol%)MeOH, 23 °C
O
R
OH
1.1 equiv
R = (CH3)2CH 15 h, 62%
R = p-NO2Ph 5 h, 94%
R = Ph 15 h, 91%
R = p-OMePh 15 h, 67%48 h, 83%
Ph O
OOH
Ph S
OOH
2h, 53% 1h, 92%
• MgCl2/TMEDA work as Lewis acid, with DMAP as nucelophile
Urea Catalyst for MBH Rate EnhancementO
CO2Mecatalyst (20 mol %)DABCO (1 equiv)
23 °C, neatCO2Me
OH
(10 equiv)
X
NH
NH
R
R R
RR = H, X = S
R = F, X = S
R = F, X = O
R = CF3, X = S
R = CF3, X = O
krel
none
Catalyst1.0
1.7
5.7
5.4
3.7
6.7
• EWG urea promotes reaction
88%, 20 h
CO2MeOH
MeO71%, 4 d
CO2MeOHNO2
93%, 1 h
O
OHCO2Me
88%, 2 h
CO2MeOHOMe
81%, 3 d
Connon, S. J.; Maher, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1301-1305.
• Urea catalyst enhances reaction rate through H-bonding
• Reactions employing MVK and catalyst resulted in decomposition
Exploration of MBH Amine Catalysts
Aggarwal, V. K.; Emme, I.; Fulford, S. Y. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 692-700.
NN
N N N N NOH OAc Cl O
pKa
krel
11.3
9.0
8.7
1
9.9
4.3
9.3
0.15
8.9
0.04
6.9
0.006
• Reactions run neat; pKa measured in H2O• More basic catalyst gives higher concentration of ammonium enolate
CO2Me
R
O
1.2 equiv
quinuclidine (25 mol %)methanol (75 mol %)
23 °CCO2Me
OH
RR = Et 7 h, 83%R = 2-furyl 1 h, 84%R = cinnamyl 3 h, 62%R = p-MePh 9 h, 82%
• Catalytic MeOH aids in initial conversion and solubility of reactants
NN
pKa
krel
8.7
1
N NOAc Cl
9.3
0.15
8.9
0.04
• DABCO higher pKa in aprotic solvents, higher rate of reaction
time (h), yield previous best
14h, 83%20h, 85%24h, 43%24h, 61%
Exploration of MBH Amine Catalysts
Aggarwal, V. K.; Emme, I.; Fulford, S. Y. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 692-700.
CN
R
O
1.2 equiv
quinuclidine (25 mol %)methanol (75 mol %)
23 °CCN
OH
R
CNOH
3 h, 81%5 min, 5kbar, 70%
CNOH
1 h, 87%4 h, 97%
CNOH
O20 min, 78%
5d, 74%
CNOH
6 h, 76%40 h, 66%
CONH2
R
O quinuclidine (50 mol %)methanol (7.5-14M)
23 °CCONH2
OH
R
CONH2
OHN
5 h, 83%24 h, 89%
CONH2
OH
O5 h, 66%
48 h, 61%
CONH2
OH
O2N4 h, 65%
24 h, 95%
CONH2
OH
3 d, 55%n/a
conditionsprevious best
• Very few acrylamide examples in literature
conditionsprevious best
Octanol for Rate Enhancement of MBH
COMeO
Me
DABCO (15 mol %)
23 °C, 12 hCOMe
Me OH
COMe
OH
7% : 7%COMe
OH
MeO
0% : 8%COMe
OH
F3C
20% : 0%COMe
OH
NO2
16% : 0%
Chong, Y.; Choo, H.; Park, K.-S.; Kim, J. Synlett 2007, 395-398.
Me
O
Me
OH2OMeOHBuOHoctanolCH3(CH2)11OHcyclohexanol
0% : 0%28% : 12%50% : 10%65% : 8%50% : 9%
68% : 10%• 2 equiv of octanol provided 90% yield MBH adduct
3 mL MeOHoctanol (2 equiv) 100% : 0% 100% : 0% 18% : 43% 91% : 9%
• Reactions with MVK and challenging aldehydes unsuccessful
O
MeH
R3N
Me
O
OHO
H
• stabilization of transition state through van der Waals
p-Nitrophenol as a Promoter with PPh3
H
OO PPh3 (20 mol %)
p-nitrophenol (30 mol %)
DMSO, 18 h, 23 °C
OOH
• p-nitrophenol acts as Lewis acid, promoting the conjugate addition step and proton transfer
Shi, M.; Liu, Y.-H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 1468-1470.
52%25% no additive
OOH
MeO35%
OOH
O2N98%
OOH
72%
OOO
Ph3P
H B
PPh3
H B
enolate stabilization assisted deprotonation
H
Complications Associated with MBH
• Very slow reaction rates
• Reactive substrates lead to dimerized products
CO2Me DABCO
neat, 23 °C, 6 d
O
PhCO2Me
Ph
OH
89%
Caubere, P.; Fort, Y.; Berthe, M. C. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6371-6384.Shi, M.; Ma, G.-N.; Jiang, J.-J.; Wei, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5496-5514.
COPh DABCO
DMF, 20 °C60-70 h
O
p-NO2Ph
OH
p-NO2PhCOPh
COPh
COPh COPh
76%15%
• No traditional MBH product observed
• More electron rich aromatic aldehydes less reactive
The Double MBH Reaction
Shi, M.; Ma, G.-N.; Jiang, J.-J.; Wei, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5496-5514.
Ph
ONR3 Ph
O
R3N
R1CHO Ph
O
R3N
R1
O
Ph
O
R1
O
Ph
O
R3N
Ph
O
R1
O
Ph
O
R1
O
Ph
O
R1CHO Ph
O
R1
O
NR3
NR3
HH
HH
COPhCOPh
R3N
COPh
Ph
O
R3N
• Treating PVK dimer with nucelophile and aldehyde does not provide double MBH adduct
R3N
Ph
O
R1
OH
COPhCOPh
R3N
The Double MBH ReactionO
PhO
RH
DABCO (10 mol %)
DMF, 20 °C60-70 h Ph
OCOPh
OH
RPh
O
Ph
O
R = m-NO2Ph2 equiv
76% 15%R = Ph trace 33%
O
OPh
O
RH
DABCO (10 mol %)
DMF, 20 °C40-50 h
2 equiv
OPh
O
R
OH
R = m-NO2Ph 74%R = Ph 79%
• No MBH product observed; challenging aldehydes give only PVK dimer
• No dimerization or double MBH adductsShi, M.; Li, C.-Q.; Jiang, J.-K. Molecules 2002, 7, 721-733.Shi, M.; Ma, G.-N.; Jiang, J.-K.; Wei, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5496-5514.
O
Me
O
H
NO22 equiv
NR3 (10 mol %)
DMF, 20 °C40-60 h Me
OCOMe
OH
RMe
O
R
OH
DMAPDABCO
85% 0%63% 23%
• Nucelophile used can affect formation of double MBH adducts
Avoiding Dimerization: The Sila-MBH
Gevorgyan, V.; Trofimov, A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 253-255.
TMSAr
O
Ar2
O
H
TTMPP (5 mol %)
C3H7CN, 23 °C
1.5 equiv
Ar
O
Ar2
TMSO
O
R
TMSOO
Ph
TMSO
OMe69%
O
Ph
TMSO
Cl72%
P
MeO
OMe
MeO 3TTMPP
TMSAr
O
PR3
TMSAr
O
PR3
Ar2
O
TMS Ar
O
PR3
OAr2
Ar
O
Ar2
TMSO
R = p-ClPh
R = Ph
R = p-OMePh
99%
81%
55%
• Normal MBH adducts achieved with electron rich vinyl ketones
-PR3
• 1,3-Brook rearrangement triggers elimination to provide product
Avoiding Dimerization: The Sila-MBH
MeO2C CO2Me
TMS
TTMPP (1 mol %), RCHO (2 equiv)
dioxane, 23 °C
MeO2C CO2Me
R
OTMS
MeO2C CO2Me
Ph
OTMS
MeO2C CO2Me
OTMS
MeO2C CO2Me
OTMS75%
OMe
65%
Ph
76%
MeO2C CO2Me
OTMSPh
69%
MeO2C CO2Me
Ph
OTMSn-Bu
86%
MeO2C CO2Me
PhOTMSCF3
53%
• Steric bulk not an issue due to highly reactive substrate
Gevorgyan, V.; Chuprakov, S.; Malyshev, D. A.; Trofimov, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14868-14869.
• Inspiration for sila-MBH of aryl vinyl ketones
• !-substitution well-tolerated; ketones function as electrophiles
Complications Associated with MBH
• Very slow reaction rates
• Reactive substrates lead to dimerized products
CO2Me DABCO
neat, 23 °C, 6 d
O
PhCO2Me
Ph
OH
89%
Caubere, P.; Fort, Y.; Berthe, M. C. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6371-6384.Shi, M.; Ma, G.-N.; Jiang, J.-J.; Wei, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5496-5514.
COPh DABCO
DMF, 20 °C60-70 h
O
p-NO2Ph
OH
p-NO2PhCOPh
COPh
COPh COPh
76%15%
• Sila-MBH or change nucleophile
• Use protic additives to assist RDS of proton transfer
R3N
Ph
OH
EWGHO
R2
Synthetic Challenges Associated with MBH• Asymmetric Induction
• Esoteric substrates give high selectivity
• Previous attempts with chiral amines, aldehydes, and acrylates unsuccessful
SO
O
N
OMeCHO, DABCO
CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 12 h
O
O
O
MeMe85%, 99% ee
Leahy, J. W.; Brzezinski, L. J.; Rafel, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4317-4318Fráter, G.; Roth, F.; Gygax, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1045-1048.
• Intramolecular MBH
CO2Et
OMe PBu3, 23 °C, 1 d
CO2Et
OH
75% conversion
• First example of an intramolecular MBH
• Employing different electrophiles and exploring scope of the reaction
Another Look at the MBH Mechanism
HOEt
OH
OEt
O
R3N
PhCHO
OR1
O
R3N
H
OPh
HO
R2
R3N
Ph
OH
EWGHO
R2
R3N
Ph
O
OEt
O
Ph
OH
OEt
O
or
Aggarwal, V. K.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Fulford, S. Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1706-1708.
RDS step 2RDS step 3
• Competition experiment between d-ethyl acrylate/ethyl acrylate
• Demonstrates RDS step 3 until 20% conversion, then RDS step 2
N
-NR3
RDSlate
stage
RDS early stage
Mechanism Explains Difficulties in Asymmetric Induction
O
OR
Nu!
OH R1CHO R1
O
Nu!
OR
OH
OH
!
!
RLSR1
! OR
OOHfast
slow
slow
slow
Aggarwal, V. K.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Fulford, S. Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1706-1708.
• 4 diastereomeric intermediates possible before proton transfer/elimination
• Past attempts unsuccessful due to incomplete understanding of mechanism
• Chiral amines or chiral lewis acids unlikely to control proton transfer step
• With properly designed chiral catalysts, only one diastereomeric intermediate will proceed to product
O
O CF3
CF3 catalyst (10 mol %)
THF or DMF, -55 °C p-NO2Ph O
O
CF3
CF3OH
Early Example of Asymmetric MBH
O O
p-NO2Ph
Op-NO2Ph
Hatakeyama, S.; Iwabuchi, Y.; Nakatani, M.; Yokoyama, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10219-10220.
N
N
OMe
OH
(+)-quinidine
N
N
OMe
ON
N
OMe
OH
OH
O
O2N3 equiv
N
N
OH
O
A B
A : 12%, ee ndB : 22%, 33% ee
A : 2%, ee ndB : 32%, 35% ee
A : 63%, 35% eeB : 10%, 33% ee
A : 58%, 91% eeB : 11%, 04% ee
• Less sterically hindered amine enhances rate of reaction
R O
O
CF3
CF3OHO O
R
OR
R = Ph A : 57%, 95% eeB : n/a
R = isobutyl A : 51%, 99% eeB : 18%, 85% ee
• High enantioselectivities for electron rich aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes
N
O
Et
N
OH
H
N
O
Et
N
O H
H
CO2RHHRO
Mechanistic Rationale for Stereoinduction
N
O
Et
N
O H
H
CO2RHHRO
OR
OOCH(CF3)2
Ocatalyst
R1CHO
R1CHO
OH
R1
O
ORO O
R1
R1 O
OH
R1
O
ORO O
R1
R1 O
R1CHOR1CHO
Hatakeyama, S.; Iwabuchi, Y.; Nakatani, M.; Yokoyama, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10219-10220.
NR2
H HH
CO2RYX
OHO
N
Thiourea Catalyst for Asymmetric MBH
NH
NH
S CF3
CF3N
OO catalyst (10 mol %)
solvent, 0 °C, 48 h
O OH
Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Yu, X.; Zu, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4293-4296.
PhPh
5 equiv
NH
NH
S CF3
CF3
NMe2
21%, 39% ee
NH
NH
S CF3
CF3N
56%, 73% ee 83%, 71% ee
• Binaphthyl amine essential for yield and enantioselectivity
• Optimized conditions with CH3CN provide 80% yield, 83% ee
O OH
63%, 94% ee
O OH
71%, 90% ee
O OH
n-Bu
84%, 81% ee
O OH
Cl55%, 60% ee
• Increased sterics improves enantioselecitivity; aromatic aldehydes provide moderate ee's
Simple Thiourea for Asymmetric MBH
S
NH
NH
CF3
CF3Ph
OH
S
NH
NH
CF3
CF3Ph
OH
Me
Ph
S
NH
NH
CF3
CF3Ph
OH
Ph
Ph
O Ocatalyst (20 mol %)
DABCO (20 mol %)23 °C
O OH
48h, 32%, 9% ee 65h, 56%, 46% ee 88h, 50%, 63% ee
• Removal of hydroxyl group results in lower conversion• Optimized conditions use 4 equiv cyclohexenone, 20 mol% catalyst and 20 mol% Et3N
O OH
147h, 61%, 88% ee
O OH
120h, 45%, 81% ee
O OH
119h, 74%, 64% ee
O OH
OMe119h, 86%, 56% ee
Lattanzi, A. Synlett 2007, 2106-2110.
Thiourea Catalyst for MBH with Aromatic Aldehydes
HN
NH
S
NH
R
S
HN
R
O2N
CHO catalyst (20 mol %)DABCO (20 mol %)
PhCH3, 23 °C, 3 d
O OOH
O2N
Shi, M.; Liu, X.-B. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1043-1046.
• Aromatic aldehydes have proven difficult in asymmetric reactions
R = 3,5-(CF3)2Ph67%, 5% ee
HN
NH
S
NH
R
S
HN
RR'
R'R' = Ph
R' = 3,5-(CH3)2Ph
R' = 3,5-(CF3)2Ph
53%, 39% ee
65%, 35% ee
67%, 72% ee
• More electron deficient thiourea provides highest levels of selectivity
OOH
99%, 81% ee
OOH
Cl
90%, 85% ee
OOH
F79%, 88% ee
Schaus, S. E.; McDougal, N. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 123, 12094-12095.Schaus, S. E.; McDougal, N. T.; Trevellini, W. L.; Rodgen, S. A.; Kilman, L. T. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1231-1240.
X
X
OHOH
Ph H
OO
X =
Me
Me
O
Ph
OHcatalyst (2 mol %)PEt3 (0.5 equiv)
THF, 0 °C, 36 h
Chiral Brønsted Acid Catalyzed MBH
OHOH
74%, 32% ee X = HX = Ph
X =
CF3
CF3
73%, 48% ee69%, 86% ee
70%, 88% ee 84%, 86% ee
OMeOH
43%, 3% ee
• Removal of one Brønsted acid lowers catalyst activity and selectivity
O
Et3P
H BO
Et3P
O
R
HBOOH
71%, 96% ee
OOH
82%, 95% ee 72%, 96% ee
• stabilization of enolate and assisted deprotonation
OOHEt
NMeMe
MeMe
Me
N
NMe2N
Fe PhPhPh
PhPh
Fe FePh2P
Ph2P
NMe2
Lewis Acid Enhanced MBH with Chiral Amine Catalyst
Fu (+)-PPY Fu (+)-DMAP Taniaphos
O
Ph
O catalyst (10 mol %)MgI2 (50 mol %)
i-PrOH, -20 °C, 24 h
O
Ph
OH
98%, 81% ee 96%, 94% ee 45%, 54% ee
• Less nucelophilic catalyst provides highest selectivity
Connell, B. T.; Bugarin, A. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2644-2646.
OOH
MeO73%, 95% ee
OOH
87%, 94% ee
OOH
94%, 98% ee
• Electron deficient aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes gave moderate results
• All other Michael acceptors failed to produce product
1.5 equiv
OOH
O2N75%, 89% ee
OMe
O O
Ph OMe
OOH
PhDABCO (30 mol %)
La(OTf)3 (1.5 mol %)chiral diamine (3 mol %)
CH3CN, 23 °C, 10 h
Lewis Acid for Asymmetric MBH
Chen, K.; Yang, K.-S.; Lee, W.-D.; Pan, J.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 915-919.
N N
MeMe
MeMeCO2H
HO2C
N N
MeMe
MeMeCO2H
HO2C
75%, 84% ee 70%, 67% ee
N N
Me Me
O
O
Me
Me
O
O La
OO
R3N
O
H R
• Stereochem rationalization
OR
OOH
O2N82%, 93% ee
OR
OOH
MeO
R = !-naphthyl
35%, 95% ee
• Aliphatic aldehydes gave moderate selectivity
N
O
N
OH
NH
O
OCHO (10 mol %)
CH2Cl2, - 20 °C, 4 dNH
O
HOCHO
79%, 98% ee
NO
HOCHO
Me96%, 98% ee
NO
HOCHO
Bn97%, 96% ee
NO
HOCHO
Me
F
92%, 96% ee
NO
HOCHO
Me
MeO
91%, 97% ee
N
HO
MeBr
Br
96%, 93% ee
Asymmetric Synthesis of Substituted Oxindoles
Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.-L.; Wang, B.-L.; Cao, J.-J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Wang, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15176-15178.
LiAlH4 (5.0 equiv)
THF, 23 °CN
HO
Me75%, 98% ee
NaBH4 (5.0 equiv)
THF/H2O (9:1 v/v)0 °C
OO
HOHMe
NHMe
81%, 98% ee3 : 1 dr
• Differential substitution does not effect selectivity
• In previous examples, ketones unsuccessful
• One step derivatization of oxindole products
O
H
O
CHO
Synthetic Challenges Associated with MBH• Asymmetric Induction
• Use bifunctional catalyst to control stereochemistry of addition into aldehyde and proton transfer
SO
O
N
OMeCHO, DABCO
CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 12 h
O
O
O
MeMe85%, 99% ee
Leahy, J. W.; Brzezinski, L. J.; Rafel, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4317-4318Fráter, G.; Roth, F.; Gygax, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1045-1048.
• Intramolecular MBH
CO2Et
OMe PBu3, 23 °C, 1 d
CO2Et
OH
75% conversion
• First example of an intramolecular MBH
• Employing different electrophiles and exploring scope of the reaction
Early Demonstrations of Intramolecular MBH
Keck, G. E.; Welch, D. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3687-3690.Koo, S.; Yeo, J. E.; Yang, X.; Kim, H. J. Chem. Commun. 2004, 236-237.
O
HO
SEt
OH O
SEt
solvent temp °C time (h) additive yield %
CHCl3 65 24 48
25CH2Cl2 23 3 DBU (1 equiv)DMF 78 5 43EtOH 78 1 DMAP, DMAP!HCl (1.0, 0.25 equiv) 87EtOH 78 1 DABCO (1 equiv) 18
CH2Cl2 23 15 PMe3 (0.1 equiv) 82
DMAP, DMAP!HCl (1.0, 0.25 equiv)
DMAP, DMAP!HCl (1.0, 0.25 equiv)
• DMAP!HCl assists in stabilization of resulting alkoxide, pushing equilibrium to product
O
HO
R
OH O
RPPh3 (1.0 equiv)
MeCN or t-BuOH20-30 °C
OH O
H
12 h, 98%
OH O
Ph
22 h, 99%
OH O
Me
24 h, 83%
OH O
Bu
25 h, 83%
• DABCO ineffective at inducing transformation
Intramolecular Asymmetric MBH
Ph
O Ocatalyst (10 mol %)
CDCl325 °C, 48h
Ph
O OH
N
N
O OH
82%, 80% ee
O OH
Cl92%, 79% ee
O OH
Me94%, 51% ee
O OH
S
83%, 74% ee
Miller, S. J.; Aroyan, C. E.; Vasbinder, M. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3849-3851.
• Co-catalyst conditions necessary for reaction and selectivity
NH
CO2H NH
CO2Me NH
CO2HMe
NH
CO2H
60% ee <10% ee <10% ee 60% ee
• Change of solvent to THF/H2O (3:1)32% ee 80% ee
• Ortho substitution lowers enantioselectivity
Thiourea Catalyzed Intramolecular Asymmetric MBH
Wu, X.-Y.; Gong, J.-J.; Yuan, K.; Song, H.-L. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2439-2443.
S
NH
NH
Ph
PPh2
i-Pr
O
Ph
O OH
Ph
Ocatalyst (10 mol %)
CH2Cl2, 25 °C
48 h, 72%, 18% ee
S
NH
NH
Ph
PPh2
Bn
60 h, 50%, 67% ee
S
NH
NH
PPh2
Bn
CF3
CF3
12 h, 83%, 76% ee
S
NH
NH
PPh2
BnOMe
84 h, 45%, 56% ee
• Electronics of thiourea have large effect on activity and selectivity
S
N NR
Ph2P
Bn
H HO
HO
Arre-attack
OHO
MeO77%, 84% ee
OHO
Me99%, 45% ee
OHO
F76%, 75% ee
• Ortho substitution effects enantioselectivity
Cyclization via MBH PathwayO
Cl1. PBu3 (1 equiv) t-BuOH, 5h, 23 °C
2. KOH, BnEt3NCl, 2h
O
80%
O
94%, >10 : 1
Krafft, M. E.; Haxell, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10168-10169.
OCl O
Cl
1 : 2
OCl
PBu3
OCl
Bu3P
O
Bu3P
OKOH
-PBu3Cl
• Second step needed to displace catalyst in absence of alkoxide
• Treatment of allylic alcohol with SOCl2 provided mixture of regioisomersCl
PBu3
t-BuOH, 23 °C, 5 h
Cl
>90% recovery
• Suggests no allylic isomerization, SN2' or SN2 mechanism likely
Cyclization via MBH PathwayO
RO
R2PMe3 (1 equiv)
t-BuOH, 23 °C
O
ROH
R2 O
R
R2HO
endo exo
O
Ph
OH
30h, 66%
O
Me OH
72h, 60%
O
MeOH
18h, 76%
O
R
OH
10 equiv PR372h, 92%
• Sterics govern endo/exo selectivity
Krafft, M. E.; Wright, J. A. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2977-2979. Krische, M. J.; Jellerichs, B. G.; Kong, J.-R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7758-7759.
O
R
OCO2CH3
PBu3 (1 equiv)
Pd(PPh3)4 (1 mol %)t-BuOH, 60 °C
O
R
O
Ph
92%
O
76%
O
EtS
73%
O
66%
nn
• Cyclopropanes untouched under these conditions
Synthetic Applications of MBH
EWG CatalystX
R2R1
X = O, NR
! EWGR2
R1
XH
EWGR1
XH
• New method development using MBH adducts
Conditions
EWG CatalystX
R2R1
! EWGR2
R1
XHcomplex
products
Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanarayana, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811-891.Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, B. S.; Badsara, S. S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5447-5674.
• Use MBH adducts as synthetic intermediates en route to complex products
simplestarting
materials
EWGR1
X• Formation of tri-substituted olefins
X = OH, OR X = C, Cl, Br, I, N, O
Synthesis of Tri-substituted Olefins from MBH Adducts
Ph
OHCO2Me
N
N
N
Cl
ClCl(2.5 equiv)
DMF (2 M), CH2Cl223 °C, 1.5 h
Ph
CO2Me
Cl89%
CO2Me
Cl
Cl 94%
CO2Me
Cl
O2N 97%
CO2Me
ClO
85%
• Z-selective synthesis
CO2Et
Cl
92%
Li, J.; Li, S.; Jia, X.; Zhang, Y. J. Chem. Res. 2008, 48-49.Das, B.; Majhi, A.; Banerjee, J.; Chowdhury, N.; Venkateswarlu, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7913-7915.
• Formation of Villsmeier reagent followed by attack and elimination provides Z-isomer
Ph
OHCN
I2/PPh3
CH2Cl2, 23 °C0.5-6 h
Ph CN
I92%
• E-selective synthesis
CNI
Cl90%
n-heptCN
I
89%
CNI
NO2 58%
Applications of Modified MBH AdductsOAc
CO2Me Na2S (1.5 equiv)
DMSO/H2O, 40 °C10 min - 1.5 h S
CO2Me
R X R
R =5-OMe, X = FR = H, X = FR = H, X = NO2
34%41%43%
CO2Me
X S S
MeO2C
X
S2-
S
CO2Me
• Thiochromenes have shown variable biological activity
Lee, K.-J.; Cha, M. J.; Song, Y. S.; Han, E.-G. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 2008, 45, 235-240.Basavaiah, D.; Aravindu, K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2453-2456.
NO2
OAcCO2Et
OO 1. K2CO3, THF 23 °C, 2-6 h
2. Fe/AcOH reflux, 1.5 h
HN
O
CO2Et
HN
O
CO2Me
62%
68%
HN
O
CO2Et
64%
MeO
MeO HN
O
CO2Me
63%
Br
Butenolide Synthesis From an MBH Adduct
O
R
OAc
R2
2-trimethylsiloxy furan(200 mol %)
PPh3 (20 mol %)THF
O
R R2
O
O
H H
O
Me
O
O
H H
88%, >95:5 drNO2
O
Me
O
O
H H
80%, 20:1 dr
O
Me
O
O
H H
Ph88%, 24:1 dr
O
MeO
O
O
H H
86%, >95:5 dr
Krische, M. J.; Cho, C.-W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6689-6691.Shi, M.; Jiang, Y.-Q.; Shi, Y.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7202-7203.
62-94%, >95 : 5 dr
O
Me
O
O
H H
94%, 96% ee36h
O
Me
O
O
H H
Br85%, 95% ee
24h
O
Me
O
O
H H
NO2
98%, 91% ee24h
O
Me
O
O
H Hn-Pr
60%, 72% ee96h
• Chiral phosphine used to induce asymmetry
Asymmetric Butenolide Synthesis from an MBH Adduct
NHCOMe
PPh2
O
R2
OAc
R O
OTMS10 mol % catalyst
PhCH3, H2O (6 equiv)23 °C
O
R2R
O
O
H H
2.5 equiv
Shi, M.; Jiang, Y.-Q.; Shi, Y.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7202-7203.
PPhPh
R2
O RN
OMe H
PPhPh
R2
O RN
OMe H
OH
OSiMe3
HO
H
O
OTMS
PPhPh
R2OH
OSiMe3
HO
HMeOCHN
O
R2R
O
O
H HGrob-type ROC
• [4+2] cycloaddition with Grob-type fragmentation
[4+2]
MBH in Total Synthesis
NPMB
OBnO
O Me
Corey 2004 - Salinosporamide A
quinuclidine (1 equiv)
DME, 0 °C, 7 d90%
NO
PMBCO2Me
OBn
MeOH
NO
PMBCO2Me
OBn
OHMe
1 : 9HN
OO
O
ClMe
H
OH
steps
Corey, E. J.; Reddy, L. R.; Saravanan, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6230-6231.Porco Jr., J. A.; Lei, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14790-14791.
• Diastereoselective intramolecular MBH
Porco Jr. 2006 - (-)-Kinamycin C
OO
OTBSO
Br (CH2O)n, La(OTf)3
N(CH2CH2OH)3PEt3, CH2Cl2
-20 °C, 6 h, 70%
OO
OTBSO
Br
OH
steps
O
OOH NN
AcOOH
OAc
Me
OAc
• Triethanolamine sequesters lewis acid to liberate nucleophile
Concluding Remarks
• Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction is an atom economical process that results in high levels of molecular complexity
• Despite the slow nature of the reaction, many methods have been developed to enhance reaction rate
• Asymmetric induction can be achieved using bifunctional catalysts or combinations of organocatalysts and lewis acids
• MBH products have many applications in total synthesis as well as new method development
EWG CatalystX
R2R1
X = O, NR
! EWGR2
R1
XH
Concluding Remarks
• Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction is an atom economical process that results in high levels of molecular complexity
• Despite the slow nature of the reaction, many methods have been developed to enhance reaction rate
• Asymmetric induction can be achieved using bifunctional catalysts or combinations of organocatalysts and lewis acids
• MBH products have many applications in total synthesis as well as new method development
Concluding Remarks
• Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction is an atom economical process that results in high levels of molecular complexity
• Despite the slow nature of the reaction, many methods have been developed to enhance reaction rate
• Asymmetric induction can be achieved using bifunctional catalysts or combinations of organocatalysts and Lewis acids
• MBH products have many applications in total synthesis as well as new method development
NH
NH
S CF3
CF3N
OO
i-Pr
catalyst (10 mol %)
CH3CN, 0 °C, 48-120h
O OH
i-Pr
94% ee
Concluding Remarks
• Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction is an atom economical process that results in high levels of molecular complexity
• Despite the slow nature of the reaction, many methods have been developed to enhance reaction rate
• Asymmetric induction can be achieved using bifunctional catalysts or combinations of organocatalysts and Lewis acids
• MBH products have many applications in new method development and total synthesis
NHCOCH3
PPh2
O
R2
OAc
R O
OTMS10 mol % catalyst
PhCH3, H2O (6 equiv)23 °C
O
p-TolMe
O
O
H H
96% ee
• A general method for asymmetric induction still needed
• Current methods are very specific to substrates
• !-substitution very limited to special substrates
•PhMe2SiO
R1 R
HO
R1
R
R2
OH1. Sc(OTf)3 (10 mol %) CH2Cl2, -78 °C, 15min-18h
2. HCl, THF
20:1 Z:E
O
R2
• Compatible with extremely hindered and electron rich substrates
Scheidt, K. A.; Reynolds, T. E.; Bharadwaj, A. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15382-15383.
Future Outlook
• Intramolecular variant still in infancy
Acknowledgements
Eric Ferreira
Ferreira Group