41
QUBIT VERSUS BIT 23 August 2004, Cambridge Lev Vaidman quant-ph/0406024 Zion Mitrani Amir Kalev Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217902 (2004) ,

QUBIT VERSUS BIT

  • Upload
    dandre

  • View
    57

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

QUBIT VERSUS BIT. Lev Vaidman. Zion Mitrani Amir Kalev. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 217902 (2004),. quant-ph/0406024. 23 August 2004, Cambridge. BIT. QUBIT. q, f. BIT. QUBIT. q, f. TO WRITE q, f. TO WRITE 0, 1. TO READ 0, 1. TO READ 0, 1. NO!. N. N. N. N. N. N/2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

QUBIT VERSUS BIT

23 August 2004, Cambridge

Lev Vaidman

quant-ph/0406024

Zion MitraniAmir Kalev

Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217902 (2004),

Page 2: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

QUBIT BIT

Page 3: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

TO READ TO READ

QUBIT BIT

TO WRITE TO WRITE

NO!

Page 4: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

N N N

N/2 NN

N/2

DENSE CODING

N NKNOWN QUBITS

Page 5: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Teleportation

UNKNOWN QUBIT

2 BITS

Page 6: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Teleportation

UNKNOWN QUBIT

2 BITS

2

Page 7: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

Page 8: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

Tasks with 2 possible outcomes

1

32

4i

eveni

N

i

1

... N

oddi

N

i

1

?or

5

We know integeri

N

i

1

Page 9: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

Tasks with 2 possible outcomes

1

32

4i

eveni

N

i

1

... N

oddi

N

i

1

?or

5

We know integeri

N

i

1

Page 10: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

Tasks with 2 possible outcomes

1

32

4i

eveni

N

i

1

... N

oddi

N

i

1

?or

5

We know integeri

N

i

1

Page 11: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the parity of the integral of a classical field Galvao and Hardy,Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 087902 (2003)

1

32

4i ... N

5

evenN

i i

N

i i 11

11

1 2

B

A

N

i i dxx)(1

1

N

i iinteger

ii

Page 12: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integerdxxIB

A )(

A

B

Page 13: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integerdxxIB

A )(

Binary representation of I

mod2)mod2()mod2(... 2mod2

2mod22

2

II IIII

)mod2(2mod2mod2 2mod22 IIII

2

3

dd 1

22 dd

223 dd

2mod2

2I

2

2

2

mod23

I

.

. .

.

.

. …1 0 1

A

B

Page 14: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

2

3

dd 1

22 dd

223 dd

2mod2

2I

2

2

2

mod23

I

.

. .

.

.

.

0 0 0 0 0 … 1 0 1

n

12 n

dnd

2

1-n

2

mod2In

Page 15: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

What can we do with bits passing one at a time?

A

B

( )xB

AdxxI )(

Page 16: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

What can we do with bits passing one at a time?

A

B

or( )x

We can “write” a real number in a bit as the probability of its flip

dxxdp )(]flip[

B

AdxxI )(

dxxedxxdp )()(1]flipno[

Idxxdxx eeedpp )()(]flipno[

]flipno[ln1 pI 11 I

NeI

Page 17: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Uncertainty in measurement with bits

11 I

NeI

MI Optimization for M

2.1 N

MI 3.1

B

Adxx)(

The number of bits for finding MI is 2~ M

Page 18: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Uncertainty in measurement with bits

11 I

NeI

MI Optimization for M

2.1 N

MI 3.1

B

Adxx)(

The number of bits for finding MI is 2~ M

The number of qubits for finding MI is M2log~

Quantum method yields precise result for integer I if MN 2log

Page 19: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integernondxxIB

A )(

Page 20: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integernondxxIB

A )(

dd A

B

I N

1

N qubits

N

II

Page 21: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integernondxxIB

A )(

dd A

B

N

1

N entangled qubits

N

II

Peres and Scudo PRL 86 4160 (2001)

Page 22: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

But the digital method works much better!

mdxxIB

A)(

ddnn 12

2

~2cos)

~( nn

np

2

~

21

.

. .

.

.

.

A

B

Inn 12

n~

2

~

2

~

32

21

N

1nn1-n2mI

~

~~

N

n

IInIIp

12

)~

(2cos)|~(

N

M

2

10

Page 23: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Quantum uncertainty

N

M

2

10~

Classical uncertainty N

M~

)mmIII ~(~

Page 24: QUBIT VERSUS BIT
Page 25: QUBIT VERSUS BIT
Page 26: QUBIT VERSUS BIT
Page 27: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Information about I in N qubits is in N ,..., 21

Can we use a single particle in a superposition of N different states instead?

2

~

21

.

. .

.

.

.

Inn 12

n~

2

~

2

~

32

21

.

.

.

Page 28: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Information about I in N qubits is in N ,..., 21

Can we use a single particle in a superposition of N different states instead?

2

~

21

.

. .

.

.

.

Inn 12

n~

2

~

2

~

32

21

.

.

.

No. Hilbert space is too small : states2N states2ofinstead N

Page 29: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with a single particle in a superposition of states

NK 2

Page 30: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

)(x

)(int xK

kH

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with a single particle in a superposition of states

NK 2

Page 31: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

)(x

)(int xK

kH

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with a single particle in a superposition of states

NK 2

mI ~~ Measurement yields

Page 32: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

The probability of the error )( Ip III~

Page 33: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

N qubits Single particle NK 2

Page 34: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Binary representation of k

k

N qubits Single particle

1101001

for0

for22

j

j

j K

I

K

kI

K

IN

j

jN

j j

22211

N

jN

1in )(

2

1

N

jj

j

K

kIi

Nkje

N

1

2

1

2

fin ),(2

1

K

kI2

Page 35: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Binary representation of k

k

N qubits Single particle

1101001

for0

for22

j

j

j K

I

K

kI

K

IN

j

jN

j j

22211

N

jN

1in )(

2

1

N

jj

j

K

kIi

Nkje

N

1

2

1

2

fin ),(2

1

K

kI2

Interaction

Page 36: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

N qubits Single particle NK 2 states

Page 37: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with N bits running together

A

Bdxxdp )(]count[

countsNI

N

MI

N

II

2

10

counts

Quantum methods

Page 38: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

How to read a string of length out of strings

using a single particle?

NK 2 1N

Page 39: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

How to read a string of length out of strings

using a single particle?

NK 2 1N

10

Page 40: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

How to read a string of length out of strings

using a single particle?

NK 2 1N

10

Bits instead N2logWe need at least

Page 41: QUBIT VERSUS BIT

What else can we do with the quantum phase ?