Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Teiji Kunihiro (Dep. of Physics, Kyoto)
RBRC Workshop at Brookhaven National Laboratory“Understanding QGP Through Spectral Functions and Euclidean Correlators”,
at BNL, April 23-25, 2008
Quark Quasi-Particle Pictureat Finite Temperature and Density
in Effective Models
In collaboration withM. Kitazawa, T. Koide, K. Mitsutani and Y. Nemoto
YITP
Thoretical (half-conjectured) Phase Diagram of QCDThoreticalThoretical (half(half--conjectured) Phase Diagram of QCDconjectured) Phase Diagram of QCD
RHIC
TT
μμ
CEPTc
2Tc
chiral sym. broken (antiquark-quark condensate)
confinement
chiral sym. restored deconfinement
quark-quark condensate
GSI,J-PARC
compact stars
diquark fluctuations
chiral fluctuations
Phase transitions large fluctuations owing to strong coupling around the critical points. There may exist also other low-lying (hadronic) excitations in the QGP phase.
density fluctuations
Here we explore how they affectquark quasi-particle picture!
ContentsContentsContents
1.Introduction2. diquark fluctuations and pseudogap in quark
specral function in hot and dense quark matter --- a lesson from condensed matter physics ---
3.Soft modes of chiral transition and anomalous quasi-quark spectrum
4.Summary and concluding remarks
2. Diquark fluctuations and pseudogap in quark spectral function in hot and dense quark matter
2. 2. DiquarkDiquark fluctuations and fluctuations and pseudogappseudogap in in quark spectral function in hot and dense quark spectral function in hot and dense quark matterquark matter
The mechanism of the pseudogap in High-TcSC is still controversial, but see,Y. Yanase et al, Phys. Rep. 387 (2003),1, where the essential role of pair fluc. is shown.
:Anomalous depression of the density of states near the Fermi surface in the normal phase. Pseudogap
Phase diagram of cupratesto be high-Tc
superconductor
Renner et al.(‘96)
Lesson from condensed matter physics on strong correlations
(hole doping)
A typical non-Fermi liq. behavior!
Fermi energy
( )ρ ω
μ = 400 MeV
Possible pseudogap formation in heated quark matter
Fermi energy
N(ω)/104
ω
3
3( ) ( , )(2 )dN ω ρ ωπ
= ∫k k
M. Kitazawa, T. Koide, T. K. and Y. NemotoPhys. Rev. D70, 956003(2004);Prog. Theor. Phys. 114, 205(2005),
T
μ
Pseudogap ?
pseudogap !
c
c
T TT
ε−
=
CSC
Pseudogap isformed above Tcof CSC in heatedquark matter!
How?
for μ = 400 MeVT
= 1.05Tc
1 1( ) Im1
( )DSe βωω
πω−= −
−kk
Dynamical Structure Factorof diquark fluctuations
sharp peak at the origin(= diffusive over-damping mode)
( , )nD ω =k + + ⋅⋅⋅
Mechanism of the pseudogap
formation1. Development of precursory diquark fluctuations above Tc
2.Coupling of quarks with the diquark fluctuations
+ + +⋅⋅⋅
Cherenkov-like emission
of diquark mode around Fermi energy
( , )kωΣ = μquark self-energy
Depression of the quark spectralFunction around the Fermi energy
= 400 MeV, =0.01ε
GC
=4.67GeV-2
ω
kkF
Janko, Maly, Levin, PRB56,R11407 (1995)
Mixing between particles and holesowing to the Landau damp. by thecollective diquark mode.
level repulsion of energy level
Level repulsion or Pseudo gap due to resonant scatteringLevel repulsion or Pseudo gap due to resonant scatteringLevel repulsion or Pseudo gap due to resonant scattering
M. Kitazawa, T.K. and Y. Nemoto, Phys. Lett.B 631(2005),157
particle hole particle
particleholeparticlehole
particle #-1
particle #+1
3. Soft modes of chiral transition and anomalous quasi-quark spectrum
3. Soft modes of 3. Soft modes of chiralchiral transition and transition and anomalous quasianomalous quasi--quark spectrumquark spectrum
Chiral Transition and the collective modesChiralChiral Transition and the collective modesTransition and the collective modes
c.f. The sigma as the Higgs particle in QCD
; Higgs fieldHiggs particle
0
para sigmapara pion
The low mass sigma in vacuum is now established:pi-pi scattering; Colangero, Gasser, Leutwyler(’06) and many others Full lattice QCD ; SCALAR collaboration (’03)
q-qbar, tetra quark, glue balls, or their mixed st’s?
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
M (GeV)- Γ
/2 =
Im M
(G
eV
) Basdevant et al. (1972) Achasov, Shestakov (1994) Zou, Bugg (1994) Janssen et al. (1995) Tornqvist (1996) Kaminski (1997) Ishida (1997) Locher, et al. (1998) Oller, Oset (1999) Oller, Oset (1999) Kaminski (1999) Hannah (1999) Anisovich, Nikonov (2000)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Digression:The poles of the S matrix in the complex mass plane fthe sigma meson channel:
complied in Z. Xiao and H.Z. Zheng (2001)
Softening ?
See also, I. Caprini, G. Colangero and H. Leutwyler, PRL(2006);H. Leutwyler, hep-ph/0608218 ; M_sigma=441 – i 272 MeV
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
5.24 5.26 5.28 5.3 5.32 5.34
m = 0.02L = 8
πa0 [δ]f0 [σ]
σπ
the softening of the σ
withincreasing T
T
μ
TFluctuations of chiral
order parameter
around Tc
in Lattice QCD
The spectral function of the degenerate ``para-pion” and the ``para-sigma” at T>Tc for the chiral transition: Tc=164 MeV
T. Hatsuda and T.K. (1985)
T
μ
T
(NJL model cal.)
[ ]2 ( ), (0)( ) SGD x xσ ψψ ψψ= −
= + +
( ,1( , ) m )Ip D pσσρ ωπ
ω= −
PNJL model
S. Rößner, T. Hell, C. Ratti,W. Weise.arXiv:0712.3152
[hep-ph]
K. Fukushima (2004)C. Ratti, M. Thaler, W. Weise (2006)
Para-pion
and para-sigma modes are still seen in PNJL model
P=Polyakov-loop coupled
W. Weise, talkat NFQCD2008 atYITP, Kyoto.
Quark Self-energy at finite T),(),(),(),( 0000
00 ppppppppp SV Σ+⋅Σ−Σ=Σ γγ
=0Quark Spectral function
particle antiparticle
0 0 0 0( , ) ~ ( ) ( )p p p p p pρ δ δ− + +c.f: for a free quark
0 0( , ) ( , )ρ ρ+ −= −p p p pat zero density
Quark Spectral FunctionQuark Spectral FunctionQuark Spectral Function
),(),(),(),( 00000
0 pppppppp SV ρργρρ +⋅−= pγ
=0
(chiral limit)
0 0 0 0 0( , ) ( , ) ( , )p p p p p pρ ρ γ ρ γ− −+ +Λ Λ= +
00 0
0
1( , )( ( ,, ) )
G p pG p p p pΣ
=−
0
0 0
00
0
1( , ) Im ( , )
( , ) ( , )
p p G p p
p p p pγ
ρπ
ρ ρ γ+ + −−
= −
= Λ Λ+
Digression: Quarks at very high T (T>>Tc) ---- physical origin of plasmino and thermal mass ---
Digression:Digression: Quarks at very high T (T>>Quarks at very high T (T>>TcTc)) -------- physical origin of physical origin of plasminoplasmino and thermal massand thermal mass ------
1-loop (g<<1) + HTL approx. T),,( <<qmp ω
=Σ ),( pω
T
CSChadron
QGP
μTc
ω
p
Tm
Tm−
quasi-q
anti- plasmino
plasmino
quasi-anti-q
p
plasmino
quasi-anti-q
quarkanti-quark
( , )pρ ω+( , )pρ ω−
quark anti-qth hole quark
Thermally excitedanti-quarks
=
Klimov, Weldon(’82),Pisarski(’89), A.Schaefer, Thoma (’99)
We incorporate the fluctuation mode into a single particle Green
function of a quark through a self-energy.
+ +Σ Σ Σ
+ ⋅⋅⋅=−
=)(),(
1),(0 ,pωΣpG
pGnn
n ωω
+ + + ⋅⋅⋅
≡, n mi iω ω+ +k q
, miωq=
Σ=Σ ),( pnω
),(),()2( 03
3
qGqpDqdT mm
mn ωωωπ∑∫ ++=
Non self-consistent T-approximation (1-loop of the fluctuation mode)
Quarks coupled to Quarks coupled to chiralchiral soft modessoft modes near near TcTc
N.B. This is a complicated multiple integral owing to the compositeness of the para-sigma and para-pion modes.
k
[MeV]
k
[MeV]
ω [MeV]
ρ+
(ω,k)ρ-
(ω,k)
k
[MeV]
ε = 0.05
c
c
T TT
ε −=Spectral Function of Quark Spectral Function of Quark Spectral Function of Quark
0 0 0 0 0( , ) ( , ) ( , )p p p p p pρ ρ γ ρ γ− −+ +Λ Λ= + Kitazawa, Nemoto and T.K.,Phys. Lett. B633, 269 (2006),
[ ] 1Re ( , ) | | Re ( , ) 0S ω ω ω−+ += − − Σ =p p p
Quasi-dispersion relation for eye-guide;
•Three-peak structure emerges.•The peak around the origin isthe sharpest.
00 0 0( , ) ( , ) ( , )±Σ = Σ Σ∓ Vp p p p p p
Fluctuations of the chiral codensateFluctuations of the Fluctuations of the chiralchiral codensatecodensatesharp peak in time-like region
σ , π-mode
Spectrum of the fluctuations
p
ω
2 2 ( )ω ≈ ± +s sp m T
propagating mode
T = 1.1Tc μ=0
c.f.: diffusion-like mode in diquark fluctuations
sm
sm−
CSC
T
σm
πm( )sm T
Tc
m
p
2~ pω
para
quark + massive boson.( , )niωΣ =p
Near the critical point , the soft-modes may be representedby an elementary boson. Yukawa model!
Quark Spectrum in Yukawa modelsQuark Spectrum in Yukawa modelsQuark Spectrum in Yukawa models
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
p0
-0.8 -0.4
0 0.4
0.8
p
2
4
6
8
10
ρ+ (p,p0)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
p0
-0.8 -0.4
0 0.4
0.8
p
T=1.2mB
ω
The 3-peak structure emerges irrespective of the type of the boson at .BT m∼
Kitazawa, Nemoto and T.K.,Prog. Theor. Phys.117, 103(2007),
g=1 , T/m=1.5
Massie scalar/pseudoscalar boson Massie vector/axial vector boson
Remark: Bosonic excitations in QGP may includeσ, π, ρ, J/ψ, … /glue balls… How about the case of Vector manifestaion.(B-R,H-Y-S)
(at one-loop)
quark anti-q hole quark
anti-q quark hole anti-q
quark part:
anti-quark part:
The level crossing is shifted by the mass of the fluctuation modes.
Mechanism of the 3Mechanism of the 3--peak peak fromationfromation
p
[MeV]
ω [MeV]
p
[MeV]
ρ-
(
,p) ρ+
(
,p)
level repulsion
level repulsion
: the HTL result only with the normal quark and plasmino.0bm →
0bm →
ω ωbω bω
bω bω
DiscussionsDiscussionsDiscussions
The complex quasi-quark pole --- ‘Gauge independence’The complex quasiThe complex quasi--quark pole quark pole ------ ‘‘Gauge independenceGauge independence’’
The three residues comparable at T ~ mb which support 3-peak structure
There are three poles corresponding to the three peaks in the spectral function; the pole distribution is symmetric with respect to the imaginary axis because mf = μ
= 0
The sum of the three residues approximately satisfy the sum rule
Pole position
T-dependence of the residuesT↑
Mitsutani, Kitazawa, Nemoto, T.K.Phys. Rev. D77, 045034 (2008)
Finite quark mass effects Finite quark mass effects Finite quark mass effects
•There still exist three poles.•The pole at T=0 (red) moves toward the origin as T is raised.•The pole in the ω
< 0-region has a
larger imaginary part than that in the positive-ω
region for the same T.
•The residue at the pole in the negative ω
region is suppressed at T ~ mb ,
corresponding to the suppression of the peak in the negative-energy region.•The sum of the residues approximately satisfy the sum rule also in this case.
mf / mb = 0.1
Mitsutani, Kitazawa, Nemoto, T.K.Phys. Rev. D77, 045034 (2008)
Re Z
mf / mb = 0.3mf / mb = 0.2
The pole at T=0 moves toward the origin as T is raised. This behavior is qualitatively the same as in the case of lower masses.
The pole at T=0 moves toward the large-ω
region as T is raised.
This behavior is qualitatively different from that in the smaller mass cases..
Structure change of the pole behaviorStructure change of the pole behaviorStructure change of the pole behavior
critfm
The physics contents of the three poles change at a critical mass . We find / 0.21crit
f bm m ≈
Beyond one-loopBeyond oneBeyond one--looploopSchwinger-Dyson approach for lin. sigma model; Harada-Nemoto(’08)
The three peak structure
in the quark spectral function is still therefor small momenta,although the central peak gets tohave a width
owing to
multiple scattering.
Possible confirmation in Lattice QCDPossible confirmation in Lattice QCDPossible confirmation in Lattice QCD
Unquenched lattice simulation with hopefully chiral fermionaction on a large lattice isnecessary for accommodate the possible chiral fluctuationswith energy comparable to 200cT ∼ MeV.
Harada, Nemoto,0803.3257(hep-ph)
Future problems:Full self-consistent calculationConfirmatin in the lattice QCDexperimental observables ; eg. Lepton-pair production (PHENIX?)
transport coefficientsSoft mode (density-fluctuations) at the CEP and quark spectrum
4. Summary and concluding remarks4. Summary and concluding remarks4. Summary and concluding remarks
In the fermion-boson system with mF
<<mB
, the fermion spectral function has a 3-peak structure at 1-loop approximation at T ~ mB
.
The physical origin of the 3-peak structure is the Landau damping ofquarks and anti-quarks owing to the thermally excited massive boson,which induces a mixing between quarks and anti-quark hole,
If the chiral transition is close to a second order, quarks mayhave a 3-peak structure in the QGP
phase near Tc
.
If a QCD phase transition is of a second order or close to that, thereshould exist specific soft modes, which may be easily thermally excited.
The boson may be vector-type or glueballs.