Upload
alessandra-conde
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1991 -Quality in Public Service Delivery introduced
• A ‘Charter Mark’ generic framework first
introduced by Prime Minister John Major, in
United Kingdom.
• Citizens’ Charter, empowers citizens with
information on services + quality standards
• Continued by Prime Minister Tony Blair
1997 –Citizens’ /Clients’ Charter (CCC) in India
- Adopted as a Resolution in a Conference of
Chief Minister, chaired by the Prime
Minister, on 24th May, 1997
- CCC, implemented simultaneously at the
Centre and in all States and Union
Territories
Malcolm Baldrige model of USA
• Defines ‘excellence in service delivery’ as
“a combination of process and results’.
• Department of Commerce, gives ‘Baldrige National Quality Award for bringing improvement in public service delivery.
• The model is adopted by all departments in the USA
2005 - Quality Management System (QMS) in India integrates - UK + USA model = Sevottam
• ‘Sevottam’ ?
It is a generic framework - for improving public service delivery on a continual basis, till excellence is achieved.
- Excellence here means improving processes to achieve
optimal point of timeliness and quality. It includes
reducing uncertainty from the viewpoint of Citizens
• Government organizations that adopt QMS Sevottam can be certified under Indian Standard 15700:2005, by Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 41 Central organizations certified from 2010 to 2013
Uncertainty for the citizen is sought to be removed through published standards includedin Citizens’ Charter
For Citizens, Public Service Delivery should not be a game of dice. They should know what to expect ? How much to expect? from whom ? when ? And where?
Public Service Delivery Systems tend to fail because major Gaps exist between intent and outcome
• Civil Servant
• citizen
• “How do we connect policy with
operations?”
• political
• “We sometimes assume that policies will implement
themselves.”
• “The civil service requires a better delivery culture.”
2 Common Understanding1. Expectations
Extent of Gap
6. Perceived Delivery
3. Promised Delivery
4. Actual Delivery
5 Experience
PricewaterhouseCoopers
• to be well documented and well publicized
• simple to understand and use
• easy to measure
Quality Standards for Public Service Delivery are -
QMS Sevottam makes public service delivery more certain and transparent
Citizens know - What service or goods to expect and What are the eligibility criteria?
• What documents and fee are to be given for availing the services ?
• How much to expect? from whom ? When ? Where? And How to avail a particular service?
• If service delivery is not as per standards, a grievance system is included in the Citizens’ / Clients’ Charter, for time bound redress.
‘Sevottam’ – Assessment/Improvement Model: Quality Criteria and Benefits
Critical Areas(3) Criteria(9) Elements for assessment* (33)
Integrated Model for Assessing Service Delivery
Citizen CharterExcellence
Implementation 5
Monitoring 3
Review 3
Public Grievance Redress
Receipt 3
Redress 3
Prevention 5
Service Delivery Capability
Customers 5
Employees 3
Infrastructure 3
Healthy competition to achieve excellence
Compliance with basic standards
BENEFITS
Citizen empowerment
Redress Satisfaction
Delivery Capability enhancement
* As questions which are rated on a five point scale ranging from “ad hoc” to “Systematic”
How? 3 Modules(M) 9 Criteria (C) 33 Elements cover all essential aspects of service delivery
• M1 - Citizen’s Charter has Criteria 1 to 3 - )• C1 Implementation ) 11 Elements• C2 Monitoring ) to Empower Citizens / Clients• C3 Review )
• M2 - Grievance Redress System has Criteria 4 to 6 - )• C4 Receipt )• C5 Redress ) 11 Elements• C6 Prevention ) for Redress satisfaction
• M3 - Capability Building for Service Delivery has Criteria 7 to 9 - ) 11 Elements• C7 Citizens / Clients ) for capability • C8 Employees ) enhancement• C9 Infrastructure )
Total Framework Three Modules Nine Criteria 33 Elements
Why are Quality Management Systems needed in Public Service Delivery?
• To improve the prevailing public perception and negative image about public services being of poor quality and uncertain
• To improve the rate of economic growth by reducing existing levels of poverty
• To make development more equitable and sustainable
Pilot tested successfully in 10 Central Ministries / Departments
• India post - New Delhi, GPO 1st to be certified• Pensions - Grievance Desk• Railways - Nizamuddin Station, New Delhi• Passport office – New Delhi• Income tax 18 services -ASK, Pune and Kochi
certified • Customs and Excise - 4 divisions certified• Kendriya Vidhyalaya – Sector 1 and 8 RK Puram• Corporate Affairs – Registrar of companies• Food processing – main ministry • Employees Provident Fund Office -Karnal unit
Implementation continued
• Initiated in 4 others: • M/o Overseas Indian Affairs, Immigration
Division• Council for Application of PART under M/o
Rural Development,• 5 Police Stations in Gurgaon,• Foreigners Regional Registration Office under
M/o Home Affairs
4 pilots in four States
• Water and Sanitation, Municipal Corporation, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
• Integrated Child Development Scheme, Karnataka
• Public Health and Family Welfare, Madhya Pradesh
• Public Distribution System, Orissa
TQM versus QMSTotal Quality Management (TQM) principles
• TQM is for manufacturing and engineering sectors principles.
• Standardization of processes across organizations
• Optimization of resources • Elimination of waste and removal
of stages that do not add any value• Systems to facilitate improvement• Benchmarking /competitiveness• Review and continuous
improvement • Cause – Effect relationship and
statistical analysis • Quality improvement teams and
divisions as ‘cost centres’.
Quality Management Systems (QMS) principles
• QMS is a service delivery system, based on the 8 principles of -
• Customer focus• Involvement of stakeholders• Process as the basis of organizing
service delivery• System as the basis of managing
service delivery• Continual improvement• Analysis of data and information for
decision making • Mutually beneficial relationship with
supplier chain to create value addition
• Leadership for keeping employees motivated and establishing a unity of purpose in the organization.