Accounting, Auditing & Accountability JournalProtecting against Detection: The Case of Auditors and Fraud?Christopher Humphrey Stuart Turley Peter Moizer

Article information:To cite this document:Christopher Humphrey Stuart Turley Peter Moizer, (1993),"Protecting against Detection: The Case of Auditors and Fraud?",Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 6 Iss 1 pp.Permanent link to this document:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513579310027512

Downloaded on: 10 November 2014, At: 06:02 (PT)References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.comThe fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3443 times since 2006*

Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:Gerald Vinten, Philmore Alleyne, Michael Howard, (2005),"An exploratory study of auditors’ responsibility for fraud detectionin Barbados", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20 Iss 3 pp. 284-303Harold Hassink, Roger Meuwissen, Laury Bollen, (2010),"Fraud detection, redress and reporting by auditors", ManagerialAuditing Journal, Vol. 25 Iss 9 pp. 861-881Bilal Makkawi, Allen Schick, (2003),"Are auditors sensitive enough to fraud?", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18 Iss 6/7pp. 591-598

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 277069 []

For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors serviceinformation about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visitwww.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.

About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio ofmore than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of onlineproducts and additional customer resources and services.

Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on PublicationEthics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)

This article has been cited by:

1. Claus Holm. 2014. Civil and common law influences on the Danish auditor's responsibilities in relation to fraud. AccountingHistory Review 24, 7-26. [CrossRef]

2. David Collins, Ian Dewing, Peter Russell. 2012. New roles for auditors and reporting accountants in UK banking supervisionunder the Banking Act 1987. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 25:3, 535-565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

3. Simon Wesley Lane. 2011. Are local authority fraud teams fit for purpose?. Journal of Financial Crime 18:2, 195-213.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

4. Jinyu Zhu, Simon S. GaoFraudulent Financial Reporting: Corporate Behavior of Chinese Listed Companies 61-82. [Abstract][Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]

5. Christina Chiang, Deryl Northcott. 2010. The audit consideration of environmental matters. Pacific Accounting Review 22:3,199-223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

6. T.A. Lee, F. Clarke, G. Dean. 2008. The dominant senior manager and the reasonably careful, skilful, and cautious auditor.Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19:5, 677-711. [CrossRef]

7. William E. Shafer, Richard S. Simmons. 2008. Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance. Accounting, Auditing& Accountability Journal 21:5, 695-720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

8. T.A. Lee. 2006. Going where no accounting historian has gone before. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19:6,918-944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

9. Christopher Humphrey, Peter Moizer, Stuart TurleyIndependence and Competence? A Critical Questioning of Auditing149-167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]

10. Rodney K. Rogers, Jesse Dillard, Kristi Yuthas. 2005. The Accounting Profession: Substantive Change and/or ImageManagement. Journal of Business Ethics 58:1-3, 159-176. [CrossRef]

11. Gerald Vinten, Philmore Alleyne, Michael Howard. 2005. An exploratory study of auditors’ responsibility for fraud detectionin Barbados. Managerial Auditing Journal 20:3, 284-303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

12. Bengt Larsson. 2005. Patrolling the corporation—the auditors’ duty to report crime in Sweden. International Journal of theSociology of Law 33:1, 53-70. [CrossRef]

13. Bengt Larsson. 2005. Auditor regulation and economic crime policy in Sweden, 1965–2000. Accounting, Organizations andSociety 30:2, 127-144. [CrossRef]

14. Ian A.M. Fraser, David J. Hatherly, William M. Henry. 2004. Illegal acts and the auditor. Accounting Forum 28:2, 99-118.[CrossRef]

15. Maria Krambia‐Kapardis. 2002. A fraud detection model: A must for auditors. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance10:3, 266-278. [Citation] [PDF]

16. PHILIP D. BOUGEN. 2000. Organizational Crime, Auditors and Liberal Government. International Journal of the Sociologyof Law 28:1, 69-82. [CrossRef]

17. Maria Cadiz Dyball, Lina J. Valcarcel. 1999. The “rational” and “traditional”: the regulation of accounting in the Philippines.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12:3, 303-328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

18. Tom Lee. 1995. The professionalization of accountancy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8:4, 48-69. [Abstract][Full Text] [PDF]

Dow

nloa

ded

by U

nive

rsity

of

Tol

edo

At 0

6:02

10

Nov

embe

r 20

14 (

PT)