31
Adviser: Dr. Meng-Jang Lin Presenter: Stan Chung Date: March 23, 2010 1

Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Adviser: Dr. Meng-Jang LinPresenter: Stan ChungDate: March 23, 2010

1

Page 2: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

2

I. Introduction

II. Literature Review

III. Methodology

Page 3: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

3

I. Research Background

III. Research Purpose

II. Statement of problemII. Statement of problem

Page 4: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

4

Regular Internet user in Taiwan

Page 5: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

91% Taiwanese rely on the recommendations from other consumers.

76% Taiwanese thought web-based opinions are trusted.

(Nielsen, 2007)

5

Page 6: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Word-of-mouth has been approved by many researchers that it has huge effect on consumer’s purchasing behavior.

(Buttle, 1998; East, Hammond, & Lomax, 2008; Godes & Mayzlin, 2004)

6

Page 7: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Word-of-Mouse

7

Word-of-Mouse

Word-of-Mouth

=Internet

+

Page 8: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Previous WOM researches focused on the study of products.

Few researches were discussing about the field of hotel accommodation, especially for hot spring hotel.

8

Page 9: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

to explore the relationships between source credibility of word-of-mouse, trust and consumer purchase intention

9

Page 10: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

1. How does source credibility affects consumer purchase behavior?

2. How does trust affect source credibility on purchase intention?

10

Page 11: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

11

I. Word-of-mouse

III. Consumer information seeking

III. Trust

II. Source Credibility

Page 12: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Consumer information seeking behavior

12

Attempting to purchase

Perceiving risk, anxious

Minimizing the risk

Seeking information

(Srinivasan & Ratchford, 1991)

Page 13: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Word-of-Mouse

13

Direct to multiple individuals

Direct to multiple individuals

No time & geographic restriction

No time & geographic restriction

AnonymityAnonymity

CharacteristicsCharacteristics

(Hennig-Thurau, Gwinner, Walsh & Gremler, 2004)

Page 14: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

The need for trust only arises in a risky situation.

(Mayer et al., 1995)14

AnonymityAnonymity

Credibility?Credibility?

Page 15: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Definition of Source CredibilityA communicator’s positive characteristics that affect the receiver’s acceptance of a message.

(Ohanian, 1990)

15

Page 16: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Source credibility

16

Expertness

Trustworthiness

Attractiveness

the extent to which a communicator is perceived to bea source of valid assertions

refers to the honesty and believability of a communicator.

includes a number of characteristics of a communicator might have(e.g. intellectual skills, personality properties, lifestyles)

(Erdogan, 1999)

Page 17: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Definition of TrustSocial psychologists define trust as an expectation about the behaviour of others in transactions.

(Lewicki & Bunker, 1995)

17

Page 18: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Trust DispositionIs not situation specific, inclination to display faith in humanity and to adopt a trusting stance toward others

(McKnight et al., 1998)

18

Page 19: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

19

II. Research Structure

IV. Participant

V. Instrument

VI. Data AnalysisVI. Data Analysis

I. Research ProcedureI. Research Procedure

III. Research Hypotheses

Page 20: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Research Procedure

20

Questionnaire designQuestionnaire design

Data collectionData collection

Questionnaire revisionQuestionnaire revision

Data analysisData analysis

Pilot studyPilot study

Page 21: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Research Structure

21

Source Credibility

Expertness Trustworthiness Attractiveness

Expertness Trustworthiness Attractiveness

Purchase Intention

Trust

Page 22: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Research HypothesesH1. Expertness would have positive effect on purchase intention.H2. Trustworthiness would have positive effect on purchase intention.H3. Attractiveness would have positive effect on purchase intention.H4. Effect of source credibility on purchase intention would be different based on consumers’ trust.

22

Page 23: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Participants

23

Tourists in Guguan

Time 15 minutes

Quantity 30 (pre-test)300 (formal study)

Age 18-65

Page 24: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

24

Guguan

Location Heping Township of Taichung County

Altitude 800 meters

Found 1907

Average degree Celsius 48 degrees Celsius

Hotels 13

Page 25: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Instrument

25

Questionnaire (31 items)

5 points Likert scale

Part 1 (13)

Source Credibility (Ohanian, 1990; Swartz, 1984; Wu, 2009)

Part 2(4)

Trust (Gefen, 2000)

Part 3(8)

Consumer purchase behavior (Swinyard, 1993)

Part 4 Personal information

1 strongly disagree

5 strongly agree

Page 26: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Part 1. Source Credibility

26

Expertness

Trustworthiness

Attractiveness

Page 27: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

27

Part 2. Trust

Page 28: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Part 3. Consumer purchase behavior

28

Page 29: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

Part 4. Personal information

29

Page 30: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

30

SPSS 13.0 for windows

Descriptive statistics analysis

To know the distribution of participants personal information

Pearson Correlation To examine the relationships between the variables (can not test cause and effect)

Regression Analysis To examine the causal effect between variables

Page 31: Proposal 0323 (Stan)

31