35
Professor Iram Siraj- Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy in selected pre-school centres : findings from EPPE and REPEY projects, UK

Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Professor Iram Siraj-BlatchfordUniversity of LondonInstitute of Education

Conference Hong Kong IEd 8th January 2004

Intensive case studies of pedagogy in selected pre-school centres :

findings from EPPE and REPEY projects, UK

Page 2: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Effective

Provision of

Pre-School

Education (EPPE)

EPPE case studyresearch

Research Team

Iram Siraj-Blatchford, Institute of Education

Kathy Sylva, University of Oxford

Brenda Taggart, Institute of Education

Pam Sammons, Institute of Education

Edward Melhuish, Birkbeck, London

Page 3: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

The Foundation Stage (see www.qca.org.uk)

covering all children 3-5 years-of-age

Curriculum guidance for the foundation stage (CGFS),

published in May 2000. Guidance is given on children's learning and on teaching, planning and assessment in the foundation stage, aims for the foundation stage and principles of early years education.

Page 4: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Early learning goalsThe early learning goals establish expectations for most

children to reach by the end of the foundation stage, but are not a curriculum in themselves. They are organised in six areas of learning:

• personal, social and emotional development; • communication, language and literacy; • mathematical development; • knowledge and understanding of the world; • physical development; • creative development. The early learning goals provide the basis for planning

throughout the foundation stage, so laying secure foundations for future learning.

Page 5: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

FOUNDATION STAGE PROFILE The Foundation Stage Profile consists of

assessment scales covering all six areas of learning in the curriculum guidance for the foundation stage. The assessment scales are derived from the stepping stones and the early learning goals. Practitioners will record whether a child has achieved each scale point and assessment judgements will be based on practitioners' ongoing observations and assessment records.

Page 6: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

• To compare the cognitive progress and social behavioural development of approx 3,000 children from a wide range of social and cultural backgrounds who have differing pre-school experiences

• To establish whether some pre-school centres are more effective than others in promoting children’s progress and development

• To discover the characteristics of pre-school education in those centres found to be most effective

• To investigate the differences in the progress of groups of children, e.g. children from disadvantaged backgrounds

Aims of the EPPE research

Page 7: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

• Six local authorities

• Pre-school centres randomly selected within the authorities to include: • playgroups• nursery classes• private day nurseries• day care centres run by local authorities• nursery schools • combined centres (integrated provision)

• A ‘home’ sample approx 300 who have no significant pre-school experience

• Approx 3000 children and 141 centres

The EPPE sample

Page 8: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Plan of Study

25 nursery classes

590 children

34 playgroups

610 children

31 private day nurseries

520 children

20 nursery schools

520 children

7 integrated centres

190 children

24 local authority day care nurseries

430 children

home

310 children

Pre-school Provision(3+yrs)

Reception Year 1 Year 2

(5 yrs) (6 yrs) (7 yrs)

Bas

e li n

e A

sses

smen

t N

= 3

,000

+

Exi

t A

sse s

smen

ts N

= 1

500

Ag

e 6

Ass

e ssm

e nts

N =

3, 0

0 0+

Ag

e 7

Ass

e ssm

e nts

N=

3,0

00+

Page 9: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Child assessments over time

Family background information

Interviews with staff

‘Quality’ rating scales

Case studies of effective centres

Sources of data

Page 10: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

• Reading

• Library visits

• Playing with letters or numbers

• Painting and drawing

• Playing/teaching alphabet or letters

• Playing/teaching with numbers/shapes

• Playing/teaching of songs/nursery rhymes

Page 11: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

• While there is a positive association between HLE and parents’ socio-economic status and qualifications, there are parents that are high on SES and qualifications yet provide a home environment low on the HLE index. Conversely there are parents low on SES and qualifications that provide a home high on the HLE index.

Page 12: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Does pre-school environmental quality as measured by the ECERS-R predict children’s developmental progress in England between the ages of 3 and 5 years?

Does pre-school environmental quality as measured by the ECERS-E (English extension) predict children’s developmental progress in England between the ages of 3 to 5 years?

What is the relationship between the scores in 141 Early Childhood centres on the ECERS-R and the ECERS-E?

Key Questions

Page 13: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

ECERS-R Based on observation – 7 sub-

scales Space and furnishings Personal care routines Language reasoning Activities Interaction Programme structure Parents and staff

ECERS-E Based on observation – 4

sub-scales

Literacy Mathematics Science and environment Diversity

Sylva, Siraj-Blatchford & Taggart (2003)Harms, Clifford & Cryer (1998)

Two Early Childhood Environment Rating Scales

Page 14: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Inadequate Minimal Good Excellent

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Example of the ECERS Rating Scale

Page 15: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

5. Science Activities: Science processes : Food preparation

3.2 Some children can choose to -YES/NO participate in food preparation

An Example of ECERS-E Item

1.1 No preparation of food or drink is -YES/NO undertaken in front of children

3.1 Food preparation is undertaken -YES/NO

by adults in front of the children

Minimal 3

Inadequate 1

Sylva et al (1998)

3.3 Staff discuss with the children routine food that has been prepared by adults, where appropriate, e.g. burnt toast or new biscuits or food brought in by children because of special events.

Page 16: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

An Example of ECERS-E Item

5.1 Food preparation/ cooking -YES/NO activities are provided regularly

Good 5

5.2 Most of the children have the -YES/NO opportunity to participate in food preparation

Sylva et al (1998)

5.3 The staff lead the discussion -YES/NO about the food involved and use appropriate terminology (EX. Melt, dissolve).

5.4 Children are encouraged to use -YES/NO more than one sense (feel, smell, taste) to explore raw ingredients.

5. Science Activities: Science processes : Food preparation

Page 17: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

7.1 A variety of cooking activities -YES/NO in which all children have the opportunity to take part are provided regularly.

Excellent 7

7.2 The ingredients are attractive and -YES/NO the end result is reasonable and appreciated (Ex. Eaten by children, taken home).

An Example of ECERS-E Item

7.3 The staff lead and encourage -YES/NO discussion on the process of food preparation such as what needs to be done to cause ingredients to set or melt.

Sylva, Siraj-Blatchford & Taggart(2003)

7.4 Staff draw attention to changes -YES/NO in food and question children about it (Ex. What did it look like before, what does it look like now, what has happened to it).

5. Science Activities: Science processes : Food preparation

Page 18: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Scores on the total ECERS-R were not related to cognitive or linguistic progress in children in the pre-school.

Scores on the ‘ECERS-R’ were positively related to children’s progress in

Cooperation/conformity

Scores on the ‘social interaction’ sub-scale were related to independence and peer sociability

Main findings From ECERS-R

Page 19: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Total scores on the ECERS-E were significantly related to progress in children’s

Social development

Pre-reading (Phonological awareness, letter recognition)

Non-verbal reasoning

Number skills

Main findings From ECERS-E

Page 20: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

      

   

   

   

Selected centres for case study analysis had better child outcomes in some of the following areas:

Cognitive:•Pre-reading

•Non-verbal

•Language

•Number concepts

Social and behavioural:•Independence and concentration

•Co-operation and conformity

•Less anti-social and worried/upset

•Sociability

Page 21: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

   

   

Key concepts

Pedagogy

Quality

Effectiveness

Case studies

12 centres with good-excellent outcomes

2 reception classes

Page 22: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

   

   

Pedagogy, international literature review:

Involvementadult and child

Co-constructionof knowledge

Instructionmodes of teaching

demonstration

explanation

questioning

modelling

Page 23: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years

Page 24: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Data entered into QSR NUD*IST – vivo

107 parent interviews and 14 centre plans

14 files of documentary and case study analysis

42 staff and manager interviews

204 transcribed naturalistic observations of 28 staff

(2 staff/setting, 400+hrs taken over 56 whole days)

254 systematic target child observations

20-40 mins each

Page 25: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

   

   

Pedagogy- the key findings are in the following areas:

• Management and staff• Ethos and climate of the settings• Adult-child verbal Interactions• Differentiation and formative assessment• Discipline and adult support in talking through conflicts• Parental partnership with settings and the home education environment• Pedagogy• Knowledge of the curriculum and child development

Page 26: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

Sustained shared thinking: An episode in which two or more individuals “work together” in an intellectual way to solve a problem, clarify a concept, evaluate activities, extend a narrative etc. Both parties must contribute to the thinking and it must develop and extend.

Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years

Page 27: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

0

20

40

60

Good Excellent

% o

f 'te

achi

ng' i

nter

actio

ns

Sustained shared thinking Instruction Monitoring

Percentage of pedagogical interactions (cognitive and monitoring) in settings varying

in effectiveness

Page 28: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

0

20

40

60

Good Excellent

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Child initiated Child but adult Adult initiated

Percentage of high cognitive challenge activities within each initiation category in

each setting type

Page 29: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

EPPE Case Studies • The individual case studies show how diverse early

years settings are. It shows that there is not a ‘level playing field’ in terms of training of staff, ratios, resources, salaries and accommodation.

• The most effective settings provide both teacher-initiated group work and freely chosen yet potentially instructive play activities

• Excellent settings tend to achieve an equal balance between adult-led and child-initiated interactions and activities

Page 30: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

EPPE Case Studies• Cognitive outcomes relate to

teacher/adult planned and initiated focused group work and the amount of sustained shared thinking between adults and children

• The curriculum is being differentiated according to age, but is uneven in coverage

• Effective pedagogy is both ‘teaching’, and the provision of instructive learning environments and routines

Page 31: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

EPPE Case Studies• Effective practitioners assess children’s performance to

ensure the provision of challenging yet achievable experiences

• Effective practitioners model appropriate language, values and practices, encourage socio-dramatic play, praise, encourage, ask questions, interact verbally with children

• Early Years staff and parents normally prioritise social development, but our evidence suggests that those who see cognitive and social development as complementary achieve the best profile in terms of child outcomes.

Page 32: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

EPPE Case Studies• Our analysis has shown that practitioners

knowledge and understanding of the particular curriculum area being addressed could not be taken for granted or DAP.

• The most highly qualified staff provide the most instruction, but also the kind of interactions which guide but do not dominate children’s thinking.

• Less qualified staff were better pedagogues when they worked alongside qualified teachers.

Page 33: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

EPPE Case Studies• We have found that the most effective early years

settings in these terms adopt discipline/ behaviour policies that involve staff in supporting children in rationalising and talking through their conflicts.

• Where a special relationship in terms of shared educational aims had been developed with parents, and pedagogic efforts were made at home to support the children, we found better child outcomes

• There is some evidence that sending children to pre-school frees parents to seek employment and further study, and that parents are frustrated by the inflexibility of centre opening times and the length of sessions.

Page 34: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

   

   

Pedagogy: theoretical underpinnings

“Move away from the current polarities of approach towards the acceptance of a balanced curriculum and pedagogic framework that includes aspects of each of the Open Framework, Child-Centred and Programmed approaches. Such a balance is already being realised in a minority of high quality settings such as some of the Nursery Schools and Early Excellence Centres in the UK. The challenge for policy is to provide more highly trained and professional teachers/educators to achieve this balance in all settings.”

From: Siraj-Blatchford (2004) in Anning et al (eds) Early Childhood Education: Society and Culture. Sage/Paul Chapman

Page 35: Professor Iram Siraj-Blatchford University of London Institute of Education Conference Hong Kong IEd 8 th January 2004 Intensive case studies of pedagogy

For further information about EPPE visit the EPPE website at:

http://www.ioe.ac.uk/cdl/eppe/

For further information about REPEY:http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR356.pdf

For ECERS E contact

[email protected]