16
Professional Skepticism Lauren Van Dyke Section C February 28, 2013

Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Professional SkepticismLauren Van Dyke

Section CFebruary 28, 2013

Page 2: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Related Concepts

Independence

Professional SkepticismObjectivity

Page 3: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

PCAOB's Definition of Professional Skepticism

Professional Skepticism - "An attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence."

Page 4: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Staff Audit Practice Alert 10

On December 4, 2012, PCAOB issued an alert that: 1. Criticized recent audit failures2. Cited lack of professional skepticism as a

cause3. Presented reasons4. Offered solutions

Page 5: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

When Should Professional Skepticism Be Exercised?

At all points during the audit, but especially:

● Transactions outside normal business● Management judgement used● Reason to consider fraud● Contradictory evidence

Page 6: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Impairments to Professional Skepticism

Incentives and Pressures

Scheduling and Workload Demands

Inappropriate Level of Confidence/Trust in Management

Lack of Knowledge

Page 7: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Consequences

● Insufficient evidence to support claims● Fail to identify misstatements● Fail to address concerns● Legal liability● Damage to reputation

Page 8: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Recommended Measures

● Accept disagreement from audit team● Assist less-experienced staff● Set appropriate compensation incentives● Assign staff according to competency and

availability● Establish clear policies for audit

documentation● Take corrective action when auditors do not

show professional skepticism

Page 9: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Context

● Definition did not change● No research breakthroughs● No recent scandals● Most of the material is commonsense

Why?

Page 10: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Audit Timing

● Issuance Date: December 4, 2012● Audits begin January

Page 11: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Mark Nelson, "A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing"

Page 12: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

A Matter of Professional Judgement● "Trust, but verify" - PCAOB standard

○ "Neutral" ○ "Presumptive Doubt" - often used in investigative

scenarios, more conservative● Recent shift

Page 13: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

"...continued instances in which auditors did not appropriately apply professional skepticism."

Staff Audit Practice Alert 10, PCAOB

Page 14: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Shift in Industry Standards

Neutrality DoubtTrust

Page 15: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

Shift in Industry Standards

Neutrality DoubtTrust

Page 16: Professional Skepticism - · PDF file"A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009

PCAOB. "Staff Audit Practice Alert 10." http://pcaobus.org/Standards/QandA/12-04-2012_SAPA_10.pdf. Accessed 24 February 2013."PCAOB Issues Alert Maintaining Auditor Skepticism." Accounting Today. http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/PCAOB-Issues-Alert-Maintaining-Auditor-Skepticism-64882-1.html. Accessed 25 February 2013."Auditor Assessment." http://www.thecaq.org/resources/pdfs/AuditorAssessment.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2013.Nelson, Mark. "A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28, No. 2. November 2009.

Resources