Upload
kuame-marks
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Probing Dark Matter and pre-Galactic Lithium with Hadronic Gamma Rays. Tijana Prodanović University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Brian D. Fields, UIUC John F. Beacon, OSU. Outline. Cosmic Rays & Gamma Rays Diffuse Hadronic Galactic Gamma Rays What we know - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Tijana ProdanovićTijana ProdanovićUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brian D. Fields, UIUCJohn F. Beacon, OSU
Probing Dark Matter and pre-Galactic Lithium with Hadronic Gamma Rays
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Outline Cosmic Rays & Gamma Rays Diffuse Hadronic Galactic Gamma Rays
What we know What we don’t know: dark matter signal?
Diffuse Hadronic Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background Lithium-gamma-ray connection Probe lithium nucleosynthesis Structure Formation Cosmic Rays
Implications Constraints
Conclusion
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Cosmic Rays
High-energy charged particles Accelerated in astrophysical (collisionless)
shocks Spectrum:
Strong shocks: Flux~E-2
Measured (JACEE 1998) : Flux~E-2.75
CR proton energy density in local interstellar medium: ~0.83 eV/cm3 (typical galactic magnetic field B~3μGauss has ε~0.25 eV/cm3)
Trivia: CR muon flux at sea level 1 cm-2 min-1
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Cosmic Ray Acceleration Sites
Any shock source is a candidate! (Blandford & Eichler 1987)
Sites Supernova remnants
(Blondin, Reynolds, McLaughlin)
galactic cosmic rays (D. Ellison)
Structure formation shocks
structure formation cosmic rays (Inoue, Kang, Miniati)
VLA image of Tycho SNR Reynolds & Chevalier
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Why Cosmic Rays?
Galaxy/Universe is a “beam dump” for CRs ! Probe acceleration sites Probe particle physics beyond our reach Probe dark matter (WIMP annihilation) Understand processes difficult to access
Structure formation shock properties Cosmological baryons
But CRs diffuse in the magnetic field…
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Gamma Rays …
give away direction! “Pionic” gamma-rays
Distinctive spectrum – pion “bump”; peaks at mπ/2 (Stecker 1971; Dermer 1986)
But no strong evidence for pion “bump” Can use the shape of the spectrum (Pfrommer & Enßlin 2003) to
find max “pionic” fraction (Prodanović & Fields 2004)
Relativistic electrons Inverse Compton (off starlight & CMB) Synchrotron Bremsstrahlung
0 pppp ismcr
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Galactic “Pionic” Gamma Rays Find max “pionic” flux
so that “pion bump” stays below observed Galactic spectrum
Galactic CRs: Max “pionic” fraction
But notice the residual!
2.75GCRp p
???
Prodanović and Fields (2004a)
Brems/ICStrong et al. (2004)
%50obs/)(
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Constraining Dark Matter
Possible dark matter annihilation gamma-ray signals
But first need to constrain gamma-ray foreground
Boer et al. 2005 (astro-ph/0508617) : “GeV excess” due to WIMP annihilation, mass ~ 50-100 GeV
Such signal requires low “pionic” component
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Constraining Dark Matter Foreground Though inverse compton
component at low end, cutoff at ~ TeV
Pionic gamma’s dominate? Unconventional spectral index
Milagro: pionic dominates indeed Observed spectral index
Milagro: pionic only ~10% !
Another component? Dark matter? Point sources?
75.2GCR )( EE
Prodanović, Fields & Beacom (2005)In preparation
61.2GCR )( EE
Milagro Water Cherenkov Detector
Need more
data!!!!
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Li--ray Connection
Any cosmic-ray source produces both gamma-rays and lithium
Connected essentially with ratio of reaction rates (Fields and Prodanović 2005)
Li abundance: local CR fluence Diffuse extragalactic : CR fluence across Universe
Given one, constrain other
0 pppp ismcr
...Li7,6 ismcr
crism yy ,,
1
Li
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background
Still emission at the Galactic poles Subtract the Galaxy EGRB is the leftover (Strong 2004,
Sreekumar 1998)
Guaranteed components (Pavlidou & Fields 2002)
Normal galaxies Blazars (Stecker & Salamon 1996)
Any other cosmic-ray source
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Estimating Galactic CR “pionic” -rays from Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background “Pion bump” not observed in
extragalactic gamma-ray background
Maximize pionic spectrum so that it stays below the observed extragalactic gamma-ray background
Galactic CRs – accelerated in supernova remnants; use propagated spectrum
Integrate over the redshift history of Galactic CR sources (cosmic star-formation rate)
Max “pionic” fraction
75.2)()( EmE pp
Fields and Prodanović (2005)
%75~/)( obs
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Galactic CRs and 6Li 6Li only made by cosmic rays Standard assumption: 6LiSolar made by Galactic CRs
Li-gamma-ray connection: 6LiSolar requires
→
but entire observed extragalactic gamma-ray background (Strong et al. 2004)
What’s going on? Milky Way CR flux higher than average galaxy? CR spectrum sensitivity (thresholds!; Li probes low E) 6Li not from Galactic CRs?
112 srscm 5, 1022.3)GeV1.0( I
51011.1)GeV1.0( I112 srscm
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
The “Lithium Problem” 7Li made predominantly in the Big
Bang Nucleosynthesis (Cyburt, Fields, McLaughlin, Schramm)
Measurements in low-metallicity halo stars: lithium plateau (Spite & Spite 1982) → indicate primordial lithium
But WMAP (2003) result: primordial Li~ 2 times higher than observed in halo-stars
lithium problem Any pre-Galactic sources of Li would
contribute to halo-stars and make problem even worse!
And then there were cosmological cosmic rays… Cyburt 2005 (private communication)
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Structure Formation Cosmic Rays Structure formation shocks -
cosmological shocks that arise from baryonic infall and merger events during the growth of large-scale structures (Miniati)
Diffusive shock acceleration mechanism
structure formation/cosmological cosmic rays
X-ray observations of galaxy clusters:
non-thermal excess (see eg. Fusco-Femiano et al.
2004)
A large reservoir of energy and non-thermal pressure
Miniati et al. 2000
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
How To Find Them? Implications still emerging Will contribute to extragalactic gamma-ray
background (Loeb & Waxman 2000)
CRs make LiBeB (Fields, Olive, Ramaty, Vangioni-Flam)
But structure formation CRs are mostly protons and α-particles → only LiBeB
Will contribute to halo star Li abundance→ “Li problem” even worse! (Suzuki & Inoue 2002)
Use Li-gamma-connection as probe
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Estimating SFCR“pionic” -rays from Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background Structure Forming Cosmic Rays –
assume all come from strong shocks with spectrum (about the same source spectrum as for Galactic CRs, but does not suffer propagation effects)
Assume all pionic -rays are from
structure formation CRs and all come from single redshift (unlike for Galactic CRs, history not known in this case)
Max “pionic” fraction z=0 z=10
2.2)()( EpEp
Prodanović and Fields(2004a)
%40~/)( obs
%80~/)( obs
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Structure Formation CRs and Lithium Use Li-gamma-ray connection From observed extragalactic gamma-ray
background estimate maximal pionic contribution, assign it to structure formation CRs → estimate LiSFCR production
(depending on the assumed redshift) Structure formation CRs can be potentially
significant source of pre-Galactic Lithium! Need constrain structure formation CRs
0.4Li
Li3.0
,
BBNp
SFCR
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Searching for SFCRs in High Velocity CloudsClouds of gas falling onto our Galaxy (Wakker & van Woerden 1997)
Some high-velocity clouds show evidence for little or no dustOrigins:
Galactic fountain model (Shapiro & Field 1976)
Extragalactic Magellanic Stream-type objects or gas left over from formation of the
Galaxy (Oort, Blitz , Braun)
Some high-velocity clouds have metallicity 10% of solar
low-metallicity, HVCs with little dust are promising sites for testing pre-Galactic Li and SFCRs (Prodanović and Fields 2004b)
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
New Data on the Way!
GLAST: A view into “unopened window” (up to 300 GeV) Better extragalactic background determination Pion feature?
Cherenkov experiments: TeV window H.E.S.S.
Southern hemisphere Observing since 2004
VERITAS Northern hemisphere upcoming
H.E.S.S. Collaboration Science 309 (2005) 746
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Final Thoughts… Universal, model independent approach: pionic spectrum
Probe both Galactic and extragalactic sourcs Li-gamma connection
Need to disentangle diffuse gamma-ray sky! Probe CR populations and implications through their diffuse
gamma-ray signatures A foreground for possible dark matter signal
Structure Formation Cosmic Rays A large energy reservoir Can have important effects (e.g. even worse lithium
problem) The key: need to use different measurements in concert
(e.g. TeV measurements: lever arm on pionic component)
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Strong et al. (2004)Diffuse Galactic continuum, EGRET data
Conventional model Optimized model
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
BBN in the light of WMAP
Dark, shaded regions =WMAP + BBN predictions
Light, shaded and dashed regions = observations
Cyburt, Fields and Olive (2003)
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Detecting TeV Gammas EM air shower: ~TeV gamma’s hit top of the atmosphere → pair production; Compton Scat. + Bremsstrahlung →
high-energy gamma’s → pair production … = electron + photon cascade
Cherenkov light Particle travels “superluminously” “Pool” of faint bluish light (~250m diameter) For 1 TeV photon: 100 photons/m2
Extensive air shower detectors: Air Cherenkov: reflectors Eth~200 GeV, small f.o.v., short duty cycle
Air Shower Array: scintillators Eth~50 TeV, large f.o.v., long duty cycle
H.E.S.S.
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Cherenkov Radiation: Gamma-ray vs. Hadronic
More narrow cone!
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
Milagro Gamma-Ray Observatory
Miracle telescope @ LANL
TeV Gamma-Ray Fishing!
Water Cherenkov Extensive Air Shower Array:
Low thresholdLarge field of viewObserving 24/7
Cherenkov light threshold lower in the waterGamma’s pair-produce faster450 + 273 PMTs
Tijana Prodanović Seminar @ North Carolina State University
12/13/2005
),(),(),(),(),(),( ,,Li txntxtxYytxntxtxq bcrp
ismcrgas
cr
),()',()',(
'),( ,
0
LiLi txFYytxqtxn
dttxY p
ismcr
t
b
)',()',('),(0
txtxdttxF crp
t
p
),(),(),(),(, tsntststsq comp
comH
)(
)()(
2 0
p
p
d
d
)(4
)'('4
)( 0,
0
, tFYcn
tqdtc
tI pismH
bt
com
)',()',(
)',(')(0 0,
tsn
tsntsdttF p
t
b
comb
p
),(
)(
4),(
)(
,,Li
, 0
txF
tF
yy
cn
txY
tI
p
p
iismcr
b
i