127

Private-Sector Standards and National Schemes for Good ... · capacities of FFV producers and exporters to meet requirements of international markets, such as food VDIHW\ DQG TXDOLW\

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Private-Sector Standards and

National Schemes for Good Agricultural Practices:

Implications for Exports of

Fresh Fruit and Vegetables from sub-Saharan Africa

Experiences of Ghana, Kenya, and Uganda

United Nations

New York and Geneva, 2008

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Note

This publication has been edited by Ulrich Hoffmann, UNCTAD secretariat, and René Vossenaar,

or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat (c/o Administrative Secretary, Division on

iii

Foreword

and processors to ensure that their exported produce is properly documented and complies with the

capacities of FFV producers and exporters to meet requirements of international markets, such as food

Traditionally, the Ghanaian fresh produce industry has dealt mainly with independent buyers and

iv

The study will be launched at the twelfth session of the United Nations Conference on Trade and

v

Contents

Foreword iiiAcronyms viii

x xi

I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 1

II. EXPORTS OF FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES (FFV) FROM

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (SSA).................................................................................................. 7

Composition and direction of FFV exports from SSARecent trends in FFV exports from SSA 9

9

III. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SSA EXPORTERS OF FFV................ 15

Tariff preferences

Changing characteristics of FFV trade with Europe ........................................................................... 19Impacts of supply chain governance .................................................................................................... 21Small-scale growers ............................................................................................................................. 22Implications of private-sector GAP standards ..................................................................................... 25Local supermarkets .............................................................................................................................. 26Costs of EurepGAP compliance ........................................................................................................... 27

28National GAP initiatives ...................................................................................................................... 28

.................................................................................... 29Role of governments and other stakeholders in GAP development and implementation .................... 31Alternative markets............................................................................................................................... 32The Least Developed Countries’ perspective ....................................................................................... 33

Discussions at the international levelWorld Trade Organization.................................................................................................................... 34The process of private-sector standard setting..................................................................................... 35

IV. GHANA................................................................................................................................... 37

Challenges to be addressed to make GAP implementation successful................................................. 41........................................................................... 42

The private sectorDonor activities

Conclusions and recommendations

vi

V. KENYA ..................................................................................................................................... 51

Compliance and competitiveness

Donor activitiesConclusions

VI. UGANDA................................................................................................................................ 63

Production ............................................................................................................................................ 64Exports ................................................................................................................................................. 65

Quality systems for horticultural production

Institutional issues, roles of the government and other stakeholders .................................................. 69Involving smallholders ......................................................................................................................... 69Extension services ................................................................................................................................ 71

Conclusions and recommendations

VII. HORTICULTURE IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA (ESA):

ZAMBIA AND ETHIOPIA ........................................................................................................ 75

Standards8082

Conclusions

VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 85

ConclusionsRecommendations

ANNEX 89

References

STATISTICAL ANNEX 99

vii

89

other activities in Ghana

80

99

99

viii

Acronyms

HAC Horticulturalist Association of Ghana

ix

UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

x

Acknowledgements

The editors wish to express special appreciation for the authors of the country case studies:

Ghana

number of experts, in particular:

Siobhan Casey

Stephen Mbithi

UNCTAD

xi

Executive Summary

Background

production of safe and healthy food, improved workers’ health and safety, application of modern

xii

The trade and development perspective

standards development and compliance may also help to enhance the competitiveness of the FFV

2 For example, SSA exporters are

2

stable economic policies, an attractive investment climate, competitive international transport connections, institutional

xiii

is less important for wholesalers, smaller supermarkets, street markets and ethnic/specialty outlets,

Adjustment strategies

xiv

National GAP schemes

International discussions on private standards

xv

Policy implications

xvi

GLOBALGAP benchmarking and standard setting

sectoral committees and the decision to form a smallholder task force to elaborate concrete proposals

Further work

Introduction 1

I. INTRODUCTION

and, in some countries,

countries, particularly those in South and Central America and North Africa, due partly to the erosion SSA exporters are required

that production practices are properly documented and comply with the complex requirements of complex requirements of of

capability led to the exclusion of many small exporters who were unable to meet supermarket

2 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

compliance schemes8 as a direct result of their inability to either obtain or retain compliance with 9

traditional markets still dominate, particularly in Africa which has a lower population density, lower

Apart from the quality assurance and product compatibility function, private standards also act as

Standards are also expected to play a catalytic role in Ghana’s efforts to shift the focus of export

World Development Report 2008,

8

9

Introduction 3

Development Priorities in National Codes on Good Agricultural Practices that can be Benchmarkedto EurepGAP,

Ghana

4 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

The information

The three countries examined here share a number of common aspects: all three have witnessed

Ghana

Kenya

The country has been

introduction of private process standards such as

Introduction 5

Uganda

broad policy

Exports of fresh fruit and vegetables 7

II. EXPORTS OF FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES (FFV) FROMSUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (SSA)

This chapter starts with an analysis of SSA exports of FFV based on statistics available from

8 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

(%)

FFV

EU-27

FFV

EU-27 as

of total FFV

(%)

Total FFV

SSA*

Namibia

Zimbabwe

Zambia

Malawi

Source:

Exports of fresh fruit and vegetables 9

A systematic analysis of trends in SSA countries’ FFV exports is not possible since only a few of them

FFV

FFV

FFV

FFV

Source

10 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Source

a number of countries in South and Central America have recently received special tariff preferences

Table 3.

FFV

FFV

FFV

Source

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Other

South and CentralAmerica

North AfricaSouth Africa

SSA

$ b

illio

n

Exports of fresh fruit and vegetables 11

FFV

FFV

FFV

Source

which trends in market requirements have had an impact on the industry concentration of production/

12 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Source:

General characteristics

Medium-term trends (1996-2006)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Uganda

Ghana

Kenya

SSA

All developingcountries

Ind

ex

Exports of fresh fruit and vegetables 13

affected FFV producers and exporters in SSA, but more detailed analysis would be needed to

Recent trends (2000-2006)

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 15

III. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FORSSA EXPORTERS OF FFV

These issues are not systematically addressed in this chapter, but some reference is made in the

20

are much smaller than they used to be, and tariff preferences are expected to play a smaller role in

inter alia

20

16 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

non-reciprocal trade concessions in favour of reciprocal

22

22

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 17

Peas 0

0 Guatemala

Morocco 0 Morocco

0(preferential

0

0

Morocco 0 Morocco

0(preferential

0

0 Costa Rica

0

0

China

Morocco 0

tariff

Morocco

Turkey 0 Turkey

Source

18 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

The erosion of tariff preferences and the limited supply capacity

28

29 the

Since the volumes and value of FFV from SSA did not decrease over the period, it is reasonably to assume that static

28

29

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 19

Changing characteristics of FFV trade with Europe31

very different characteristics

,000 smallholders involved

factors:

Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Import Manual

from all countries, such as coconut, no other FFV covered by the manual can be imported unless it appears on the list

20 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

supermarkets in explicit coordination of the chain were:

partly stemmed from the perception of supermarkets that smallholders would not be able to meet

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 21

countries also felt the need to rely more on their own production to ensure compliance with traceability

The

Impacts of supply chain governance

in combination with standards, predominate, whereas in the electronics industry all three clusters of

22 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Small-scale growers

different prices into account that the two farm types receive for their produce, from an exporter

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 23

However, demands for private standards, which continue to increase in number and complexity, are

withdrawn from compliance schemes as a direct result of their inability to either comply or retain The authors concluded that while compliance with standards such as

(for further detail, see section on the cost

Outgrower schemes

However, they also point out that one

closer relationships with fewer suppliers creates the problems of transactional dependency and

24 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Labour employment on commercial farms

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 25

Implications of private-sector GAP standards

introduction led to more pressure on exporters in

26 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

supermarkets and less so for wholesalers, smaller supermarkets, street markets and ethnic/

and

and practically a de facto

and explain the somewhat inconsistent behaviour of market partners (so far, standard adoption seems

Local supermarkets

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 27

Kenya,

Uganda,

Costs of EurepGAP compliance

28 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

been accompanied by improvements in product quality, which in some cases has been rewarded with

National GAP initiatives

key factors:

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 29

,

30 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

PMOs*

Total Total

World

Africa 998

South Africa 2

0

Ghana 29 8

9 2

8 8 0 0

0 0

0 0

Namibia 0 0

Cameroon 2 2 0 0

0 0

The United Republic of 0 0

North Africa

Morocco

Tunisia 0 0

82

Turkey

South/Central America

Mexico, Caribbean

All other countries

Source

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 31

Role of governments and other stakeholders in GAP development and implementation

32 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

and

Alternative markets

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 33

Standard

The South African market, for example, may provide a market outlet

The Least Developed Country perspective

34 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

This illustrates that some

World Trade Organization (WTO)

de facto mandatory

For more detail, see: /

Challenges and opportunities for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables 35

standards discussed do not cover food safety alone, but rather a mix of safety, environmental and

sector player to meet mandatory requirements in export markets, particularly those related to safe

The process of private-sector standard setting

This is

The benchmarked standard

36 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Ghana 37

IV. GHANA

Based on a case study by Augustine AdongoFederation of Associations of Ghanaian Exporters (FAGE)

This chapter analyses the trends related to Ghanaian exports of FFV and the country’s experiences

combination of public and private actions and investments is needed to improve food safety and

38 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

FFV

Roots

Source

FFV

Source

Pineapples

Ghana 39

Bananas

Papayas

40 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Mangoes

Vegetables

Yams

Ghana 41

and experiences:

Challenges to be addressed to make GAP implementation successful

Middle management: There is a critical need in Ghana’s fresh produce industry, and

Quality management:

distinct set of skills that determine the capacity of an industry to link up with the dominant

42 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

efforts have tended to focus on pesticide issue and have yet to develop a traceability system

Research and development (R&D) and technological transfer:

Infrastructure:

Cluster development

Institutionalcapacity:

in both the public and private sectors may constitute an impediment to the development and

Special incentive schemes for smallholders to help lower and/or partly cover the costs incurred

Ghana 43

provided by international and national experts, the national extension service for industry members,

The Government of Ghana understands the importance of the horticulture sector to its economic

44 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

use

Government

(HAG)

Members

members

and commercial food safety

of private

companies in the various

aspects of food safety and

traceability, implementation

of food safety and

traceability systems, and

support services to the

horticultural export sector

Growers involved in the

horticulture production/

export value chain

(GTZ)

technical assistance

All

All

(FAGE)

All

Government All

business plan development,

for example in the

pineapple sector

consultants

All participants in

farmers, processors and

traders

Ghana 45

46 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

less structured fashion and perceive implementation of strict documentation requirements as a burden

Ghana 47

the considerable donor assistance to:

48 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Ghana 49

Kenya 51

V. KENYA

Based on a case study by Ruth Nyagah, Managing Director of AfriCert Ltd..

52 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

shared by the very donors who supported the process, seems to be that smallholder compliance to

• Awareness that in everyday practices, respect for wildlife and conservation is an important factor

Kenya 53

smallholder producers to ensure their survival in competitive markets, as well as to the creation of an

54 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

of

EU-27as a

of total

(%)EU-27

(%)EU-27

(%)

FFV

8

Chillies

Fruit

Avocados

fruit, fresh

Nuts

Source

FFV

Kenya 55

Avocados Smallholders

Fine beans Smallholders

Runner beans

Smallholders

Shelled peas

Snow peas

Chillies Smallholders

Smallholders

Green beans Medium producers

Smallholders

Source: Horticultural Crops Development Authority

56 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

level, investment in infrastructure at the macro level (for example in laboratories and distribution

Peas

Source

Kenya 57

producers, for which exporters’ investment and technical assistance to support compliance are likely

farmers were almost universally positive about

58 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

2002

February

March

September

Kenya 59

concerns and/or requirements to be addressed include:

60 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Kenya 61

institutional innovation, extension services, the

he experience

Uganda 63

VI. UGANDA

Based on a case study by Moses K. Muwanga,coordinator of the National Organic Agricultural Movement of Uganda (NOGAMU).

However, the

64 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Production

With the exception of three companies that have their own

Uganda 65

Exports

total FFV

(%)

FFV

Peas 298

209

82

Source

FFV

2 899

Source

66 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

carried out by smallholders who, in most cases, have no appropriate infrastructure on their farms and

smallholders may be left out unless interventions are made to help them meet market requirements and

A variety of stakeholders from both the public and private sectors are involved in the work of the task

associations and stakeholders under one umbrella association, which resulted in the formation of the

now offers a more balanced forum composed of representatives from both the private and public

Uganda 67

establish the respective roles of the public and private sector institutions and to promote appropriate

68 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Water analysis

by competent authorities and also recommends that water analysis be carried out by a suitable

Varieties and rootstocks

Record keeping

Workers’health, safety and welfare

Uganda 69

Institutional issues, roles of the government and other stakeholders

A few private associations exist that can play an important role in the development of a national

Involving smallholders

70 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

requirements, for example by:

include:

that are members of these associations would therefore be able to contribute to the development of a

Uganda 71

private sector should take the lead in its development, with the cooperation of the public

Extension services

72 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

There has been discussion on a possible initiative that could result in the creation of

(

more information see: p

Uganda 73

particular:

-

-

-

would need to be implemented in a more coordinated manner, and those that are too old to be relevant

Horticulture in Eastern and Southern Africa: Zambia and Ethiopia 75

VII. HORTICULTURE INEASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA (ESA): ZAMBIA AND ETHIOPIA76

Horticulture in Eastern and Southern Africa(ESA).

76 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

kwasha

inputs and equipment used in horticulture production for export can be imported free of duty and

favourable to horticulture production and clean water is abundant (physical infrastructure and skilled

and a company can easily obtain access to land to develop export production (at a price of about

Horticulture in Eastern and Southern Africa: Zambia and Ethiopia 77

80

A

82

Vegetables

80

82

78 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

investors to set up companies and there is no need for improved access to credit, particularly for

Horticulture in Eastern and Southern Africa: Zambia and Ethiopia 79

Source:

scope

Conduct for Cut Flowers

Food safety/environmental/worker health and safety

Flowers

Germany

Milieukeer Netherlands

Social United

Max Havelaar

the Dutch member of Netherlands,France

80 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Supermarkets are a critical

Capital costs Capital costs

However, development

Horticulture in Eastern and Southern Africa: Zambia and Ethiopia 81

Whether

88

88

82 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

89

codes are an effective way to promote socially and environmentally responsible production and

producers must pay for different audits, but do not necessarily obtain a better price if the product is

89

Horticulture in Eastern and Southern Africa: Zambia and Ethiopia 83

From an environmental perspective, the case study indicates that increased production will put

Conclusions and recommendations 85

VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

90

92

and technical assistance from the donor community, which other countries in SSA of less importance

90

92

86 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Governments, the private sector and donors could help smallholders

WorldDevelopment Report 2008

partnership efforts to promote collective action and build the technical capacity of farmers to meet

Ghana

there is no or only a very weak link between food safety, health and environmental requirements of

practices which focus only or predominantly on export production as the prime development aim

Conclusions and recommendations 87

88 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

and the

Annex 89

ANNEX: SOME DEVELOPMENTS IN FFV EXPORTS FROMOTHER SELECTED SSA COUNTRIES

Burundi97

Cameroon

98

Côte d’Ivoire

Madagascar

98

90 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Malawi99

Mali100

Strategyto increase capacity to comply with SPS and retailers’ agri-food protocols to facilitate exports

,

99

Annex 91

Namibia

Rwanda104

the sector is the small scale of operations of most farmers, which constrains the dissemination and

92 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Senegal

This may have been driven partly by

Annex 93

The United Republic of Tanzania

fresh beans, snow peas

94 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

REFERENCES

/

ACP-EU fruit-and-vegetable sector relations: highlights and issues. no. 2; at:

/

Regoverning Markets– A Place for Small-Scale Producers in Modern Agrifood Chains?

The European Journal of Development

Research

The European

Journal of Development Research

The European Journal

of Development Research

Food Safety in Food Security and Food Trade

PIP Magazine

Africa Region

Working Paper Series

Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries

Journal of Development Studi

FAO Commodities and Trade Technical Paper

f

References 95

Crossroads

f

FreshInsights,

Fresh Insights,

Acta Horticulturae,

The European Journal of

Development Research

The European Journal of Development Research

It becomes more important than ever for ACP countries to strategicallyposition themselves PIP Magazine

Marketing Africa’s High Value Foods

PIP Magazine No

Fresh Insights,

Fresh Insights,

Global Supply Chains, Standards and the Poor. How the Globalization of Food Systemsand Standards Affect Rural Development and Poverty

96 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

ACODE Policy Research Series

Fresh Insights,

t

Regoverning

Markets: A Place for Small-Scale Producers in Modern Agrifood Chains?

. PIP Newsletter

References 97

World Development Report 2008

SLE PublicationSeries.

Global Supply Chains, Standards and the Poor: How the Globalization of FoodSystems and Standards Affects Rural Development and Poverty.

accessible at:

Regoverning Markets – A Place for Small-Scale Producers in Modern

Agrifood Chains?

IDS

Bulletin

World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development

Statistical annex 99

STATISTICAL ANNEX

Totalcapita

($) of GDP (%)

Total

of total (%)

SSA

SSA*

29 899

Source

2 088

Total SSA

SSA

Source

100 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

FF

VR

oots

As

a

of

tota

l

SS

A

Nam

ibia

Zim

bab

we

Zam

bia

Mala

wi

So

urc

e

Statistical annex 101

mush

room

s, c

arro

ts

Can

ned

pin

eapple

s, b

eans,

pin

eapple

Cas

hew

nuts

, co

conuts

Yam

s

Nam

ibia

Zim

bab

we

Zam

bia

Rep

. of

Cas

hew

nuts

Cas

hew

nuts

Cas

hew

nuts

Mala

wi

Cas

hew

nuts

, al

monds

Alm

onds,

,ca

shew

, nuts

So

urc

e

102 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

Nam

ibia

Zim

bab

we

Zam

bia

SS

A

So

urc

e

Statistical annex 103

Vol.

FFV

F

V

South Africa FFV

F

V

SSA excl South Africa

FFV

F

V

FFV

F

Cameroon FFV

F

Ghana FFV

F

V

Yams**

FFV

F

V

FFV

F

V

FFV

V

FFV

F

V

FFV

F

FFV

F

V

Namibia FFV

F

the United Republic of

FFV

V

FFV

F

V

countriesFFV

F

V

Source

104 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

FF

V

2 0

20

92

298

200

202

28

2 0

08

Roots

29

So

urc

e

Statistical annex 105

FF

V

Pea

s

2 0

80

808

So

urc

e

106 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

FF

V

80

202

20

0

00

00

00

So

urc

e

Statistical annex 107

Pea

s

$ m

*

Tota

l

Zim

bab

we

$ m

Tota

l

So

urc

e

108 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

$ m

Tota

l

Cost

a R

ica

$ m

Tota

l

29090

88

$ m

Tota

l

Colo

mb

ia

Cost

a R

ica

So

urc

e

Statistical annex 109

$ m

Tota

l

Zim

bab

we

2 0

28

$ m

Tota

l299.5

150.1

58.4

48.3

299.5

So

urc

e

110 Private-sector standards and national GAP schemes

*

EP

AE

BA

GS

P

Cen

tral

Afr

ica

Cam

eroon

Afr

ica

Wes

t A

fric

a

SA

DC

So

urc

e