14
SPECIAL ARTICLE Primary Angioplasty and Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Evidence Summary TRACY A. LIEU, MD, MPH, R. JAN GURLEY. MD.* ROBERT J. LUNDSTROM. MD, FACC, WILLIAM W. PARMLEY. MD. FACCt Oakland and San Fruncisco, California Coronary rngioplasty is being incrcasiqly used 8s the primaty treatmemt for patlet& with acutt mpardial inhrctka, but conhversy remains ovc7 its potcnG8l M ia prdeiwKc (0 Uwada@sis as sIaadrrd care. This rtpod summarizes tbc pnMishal evideme on health ou~cows after primary rngioplasly campared with Huoabdysis or no intmdon for patkob with acute nyoardial iafarctioa. The data t&k5 presenkd plw;dc the scieetilk p,amdwd (0 assirc plIysiciaas and other policy- makers in decidie rrhkb iatcrvcntiaa Lo provide for broad populations of patids. IJ Am Cd Cat&d 1996;27:737-50) Over the past decade, coronary angioplasty has bcen increas- ingly used as initial and immediate treatment for ppticnb with acute myocardial infarction. However. most patients with acute myocardial infarction present to hospitals without cardiac catheterization !aboratorier. There remains controversy over whether primary angioplasty should be adopted in preference to thrombolysis as standard care. Deciding which intervention to provide for broad populations of patients should ideally be based on the scientific evidence on outcomes. Searches for English-language publications referenced in MEDLINE were conducted by two physicians for key ques- tions. The reference lists of art&s identified in the initial computerized searches were used to identify other key refer- ences. Abstrxts and review articles were read for relevant references and information but in general were not included in the evidence tables. Because there are xant published long- term data from the four randomized controlled triah of primary angioplasty. one imcaigator from each trial was contacted to ask whether l-year follow-up data were available. The evidence tables and figures address the following key questions: Qtlsthl 1. EKchshs f&ml intematioa mile 1). of all patients pre5enting with true my0xdial Infarction. whal propor- tions are eligible for I) primary angioplasty or 2) thrornbol$! QKSGDII 2. h-bqild mrtalii (Tab& 2). what is the in-hospital mortality rate after I) primary angioplasty, 2) throm- holy& or 3) no intervention among patient.5 * are a) eligible for either primary ar@oplasty or thrombolys& b) at risk for Fnlm the Divikt d Rcscarch. The Pcrmancntc Mcdicd Gray. Inc.. OaklaM and ‘Sam Francinu [X’paflmcnt of Putrlii k&h and tDGw of Cw.lii. Dcparimcnl of Metine. lhcnity of CalXomia. San Fnnmm. Califrdd. v-m: Dr. Tracy A LA, Dinun d Resurck The Pmnanmtr Medic-a! Chup. IIK, 3.95 Eha~lway. Oakland Catilomia 9451 I. hlceding (i.c.. not eligible for thrtwbotysls): c) in cdiogenic shcck on presentation. Figure 1 shows in-hospital mortality after primary angio- plastv cumpared with thrombolysis in recent studies. Figure 2 summarizes in-hospital mortality after thrombol-ysis compared with control interventions in selected studies. Figure 3 includes studies on cardiogcnic shock. comparing primary angioplasty with no intervention. Qaestion 3.0&r end points. Among patients eligible for either primary angioplasty or thrombolys&, what are the following outcomes after I) primary angioplasty, 2) thrombol- ysis. or 3) no intervention? Long-term survival rates arc: shown in Table 3. Figure 4 summarizes the resul& of these studies. Fipe I. In-hptal mortality rate+ for randtnnizcd, cw~~rolkd triak 1.1primav angioplauy and rhromhol+ Nlubm b W ur I .fcrencc numtrn. FAMI = Primary Anpioplasty Myocardial Infarc-

Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Primary Angioplasty and Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Evidence Summary TRACY A. LIEU, MD, MPH, R. JAN GURLEY. MD.* ROBERT J. LUNDSTROM. MD, FACC,

WILLIAM W. PARMLEY. MD. FACCt

Oakland and San Fruncisco, California

Coronary rngioplasty is being incrcasiqly used 8s the primaty

treatmemt for patlet& with acutt mpardial inhrctka, but

conhversy remains ovc7 its potcnG8l M ia prdeiwKc (0

Uwada@sis as sIaadrrd care. This rtpod summarizes tbc

pnMishal evideme on health ou~cows after primary rngioplasly

campared with Huoabdysis or no intmdon for patkob with

acute nyoardial iafarctioa. The data t&k5 presenkd plw;dc the scieetilk p,amdwd (0 assirc plIysiciaas and other policy- makers in decidie rrhkb iatcrvcntiaa Lo provide for broad

populations of patids.

IJ Am Cd Cat&d 1996;27:737-50)

Over the past decade, coronary angioplasty has bcen increas- ingly used as initial and immediate treatment for ppticnb with acute myocardial infarction. However. most patients with acute myocardial infarction present to hospitals without cardiac catheterization !aboratorier. There remains controversy over whether primary angioplasty should be adopted in preference to thrombolysis as standard care. Deciding which intervention to provide for broad populations of patients should ideally be based on the scientific evidence on outcomes.

Searches for English-language publications referenced in MEDLINE were conducted by two physicians for key ques- tions. The reference lists of art&s identified in the initial computerized searches were used to identify other key refer- ences. Abstrxts and review articles were read for relevant references and information but in general were not included in the evidence tables. Because there are xant published long- term data from the four randomized controlled triah of primary angioplasty. one imcaigator from each trial was contacted to ask whether l-year follow-up data were available.

The evidence tables and figures address the following key questions:

Qtlsthl 1. EKchshs f&ml intematioa mile 1). of all patients pre5enting with true my0xdial Infarction. whal propor- tions are eligible for I) primary angioplasty or 2) thrornbol$!

QKSGDII 2. h-bqild mrtalii (Tab& 2). what is the in-hospital mortality rate after I) primary angioplasty, 2) throm- holy& or 3) no intervention among patient.5 * are a) eligible for either primary ar@oplasty or thrombolys& b) at risk for

Fnlm the Divikt d Rcscarch. The Pcrmancntc Mcdicd Gray. Inc.. OaklaM and ‘Sam Francinu [X’paflmcnt of Putrlii k&h and tDGw of Cw.lii. Dcparimcnl of Metine. lhcnity of CalXomia. San Fnnmm. Califrdd.

v-m: Dr. Tracy A LA, Dinun d Resurck The Pmnanmtr Medic-a! Chup. IIK, 3.95 Eha~lway. Oakland Catilomia 9451 I.

hlceding (i.c.. not eligible for thrtwbotysls): c) in cdiogenic

shcck on presentation. Figure 1 shows in-hospital mortality after primary angio-

plastv cumpared with thrombolysis in recent studies. Figure 2 summarizes in-hospital mortality after thrombol-ysis compared with control interventions in selected studies. Figure 3 includes studies on cardiogcnic shock. comparing primary angioplasty with no intervention.

Qaestion 3.0&r end points. Among patients eligible for either primary angioplasty or thrombolys&, what are the following outcomes after I) primary angioplasty, 2) thrombol- ysis. or 3) no intervention? Long-term survival rates arc: shown in Table 3. Figure 4 summarizes the resul& of these studies.

Fipe I. In-hptal mortality rate+ for randtnnizcd, cw~~rolkd triak 1.1 primav angioplauy and rhromhol+ Nlubm b W ur I .fcrencc numtrn. FAMI = Primary Anpioplasty Myocardial Infarc-

Page 2: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

16% 1 -- Fmrc 2. In-hmpiral monaliry ratcb for random- ized. rrmtrollcd rrialx of thmmhulysls 31 ‘3 weeks; “3 days. .Xl dqs or I monrh: and “‘42 days. Numbers in ?warkcls arc rrfsrcncc numhcn; AIMS = APSAC lnwvcntion Mnrtaliry sludy; APSAC = anistrcplaw (aniuyla~cd plasmirqcn strcpwkinaw aclivator complcxt, ASSET = Angb Srandinartin Study of Farty ThrumMysi~ EC56 = European Cwpcralivc Study Group: GISSI = (iruppn llaliantb per lo Studio dclla Strcpttn+inasi nctl’lnfarro Miwudicu: GIW-2 y Gruppo I~aliam pr lo Studio dclla !iopraw?viwza ncll‘lnfartc~ Mb car&w: GIISTO = What UtilbaGon cB Swqruki- nasc and I-PA for Occluded Coronary Ar~eriw ISIS = International Study of Infam Sun&al; SK = srrcptokinase: TIM II = Thrnmh$sis in Mytwrar- dial Infarcrion Phase II !+I: IPA = tissue-type pla3mmiw~4 ibclivalor.

Fqure 3. In-hospital mortality raps for caw series studies of primary angioplasty for cardiugenic shock. Numbrrs in hack& arc rcfcrcnre numbers.

Ferr 4. One- and S-year wrvival rates arn”‘lg all enrolled patients (WI only hrspitat survivors) ir- wdics ofptirnaqar@opMyandthranhoty&Nwabusin m arc rcferencr numbcn. TAMI = Thrombol- ysis and A@q&sty in Myocardii lnfarctbn trial: other aMrwiatior~ as in Figures I and 2

Page 3: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

One-year reinfarction rates arc shown in Table AJ. Rates of coronary bypass graft surgq and angioplacty are shown in Table 5.

Question 4. Stroke (TaMe 6). What arc rates of hcmor- rhagic stroke and all strokes comhincd after I) primary angio- pbsty. ?) thromholysis, or 3) no intctwntion for mytwardisl intarction?

Evidence Tables

Page 4: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

740 LIEU r-7 AL. JACT Vol. ?I. !%I. 3 PRIMARY ANFlOP:,\\rrf AND ll4ROMBOLYSIS EVII~EWE March I. I‘4%717-54

Irw, OIW,

All got :V hqwnn and WI .qinn

7

h !.lU’r 5.W;

$91 h17 741

hW< h5?‘, ‘:I’,

SK * x hcpnn SK f I\’ hcpann IPI\ 6 IV hqldnn SK 4 1PA * IV hqunn SK t PA ARAC

M%u( IPA

If*1 Ih4

h:l’, 1113’ ;

111 I!

APSAC IPA

JIII !I1

17 5

x. ttr ; ?7’,

SK ISi! APSAC INI

I3 II

7.14,s ws’ I

All pot IV hqntin: cd qntal nc4 tnu1trw~ gcn

Page 5: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

ldll tP.\

flaahr 9;

hY h.‘J

I 1’8 tl’

I - iCl

t 3.: t.si

I’I Ih:

III Ill-

;,<‘:

Cwll

_-

Jfl

Ih II

h

Page 6: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

742 LIEU ET AL JAU’ VIII 27. No. 3 PRIMARY ANGIOPL4STY AhD THROMBOLYSIS EVIDENCE March I. Iyoo:737-W

Htbd WI IW

car XM Ga&ch (4s)

IW ckc Mxw.3

Yamarmno (46) I992 cat sctm

L-e (47) FBI cacxrm

Bmdic (48) 1991 CaCWiCS

~00) 1991

c-ax hem smc (49)

lull C&UUm

Kahn cw IWO cacYxks

oxarc (51) M-7 cas vria

Raker (52) M-3 Gscwics

Let (53) l9a cau srli%

suck (.54) WI ckesctics

Pain. enzyn-nx ST chvation

Pain i?tZ min. EC<;. elu)m

ST and CK cha~itm. SBP i WI with ;Ih-tl I*‘riptwrJ anubrtun

Pain. ST elcvatiw~. %Yuylws

ST ehatim: pain <h h or rcuitenng ischcmu k-24 h

ST ekxuion: pain <CI h w stuttering &cmtr ~24 h

ST ckvatmu; pain <‘h h or stuttering ix+cmb ~24 h

syllpwm\ ampatlhlc andpain<l?h

ST ckvabn. pain. clqfn!!

All pts with rtncrgw~

wvQw~ rnw pwrcnd with thnmbtyk

ECGandcnzy~~

4.5 2lI U’t 2-y wnwal in hmpnal wmwon =. Rr+

48 22 5.K Mean lime fnxn chest Pain to shod;=LSh

Angrqhl) 26 16 C’i 4M hmvibal

04 3n 4.55 ‘-vt urn* = .54t if -_ rcpcrhrud. I IQ if not rcpcrfuvd

An* Ql”l) 22 II SW;

74“; X?;

IX? A I

.I! IS

Anprplartj ?Y lb 417

31 II) .wi

5Y 24

4.7

30-d nwtality: amln~l *up ua.5 1975-IM

Cumulatnc 1.y w-~wal = 53’;

No intcncntiun 47 .x-i ItI?

‘bxusc lkrc have hen many rdndumti cwttrolkd lrials of thtxnnhdyws. unty ttmx with > IUU patients m e&h arm were mclu~d. ahnl = ahnmtnal: AIMS = AF’SAC Intcnention Mortality Study; APSAC = aniwyktcd plasnirqcn strcpt&inar activator complcr ASA = qirin: CK = cwatinc kinar; J = day. ECSG = Eumpran Cooperative SW& Gmuy: GISSI-2. GISSI-3 = Gruppo Iialianu per lo Studiu tlla Soprawwnza rteII’lnfano Miocardii: GUSTO = GlobsI Utilization of Stqtntinav and tPA for Ck&kd Coronary Artcnes: ISAM = Intravenws Strcpdrinaw u-t Acute Myckardial Inbrctimt: ISIS = International Study of Infarct SunkI; IV = u~~ravcmws PAM = Pnrnary An&by Myacwdial lafarction wial; SBP = systdi hbd pressure; SC = suhcu~ SK = stqptokinasc; TAM = Thromh&is and An@aplas#y in Myonrdial Infarction: TAPS = tPA APSAC Patcnq Study: TEAHAT = Thromholysis brly in ACWC Heart Ail& Tri& TEAM = Trial d Emituse H Altcplac in Myuudial Infarctmn; TlMl = Thmmbdysis in Mpardiil Infan-tiun; tPA = I&C-type plzutt~n rrivaiw, w/o = withmu; Orba-liorrraCiilTahkI.

Page 7: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

JACT Vd. 27. No. 3 LlElJ ET AL March I. 199b:737-.w PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY AND THROMBOLYSIS EVIDENCE

743

kbL- 3. hg-Term Survival Among Patients Eligible for Eher Primary Angioplasry nr lhcmhotpis -

FmAurhaa

QeN- (Rllm’ E;vtva

Ycal Hmp&l I .!T ?-!I 5.\T tbm Iarlrsm crilpu In-m thdh survwd SuMId sunnal SAmnAl CinllNtnb

Painibh

F’i Y,‘r

Page 8: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

w:‘, L’,

Page 9: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

JACC Vol. 27. NIX 1 LIEU Er AL March I. IW&73’/-5U PRIMARY AfiiCrlOPLASTY AWJ THRWMU~LYSIS EWX.Wt

745

Tabk 4. One-Year Rei:.farction Raw Among Patients El@: Ic for Either Primary Angloplarty or ThromMyrls

Fm Auhor n

WN- (rcf m.) R0lf&t%Wl

YCiU Nu. ol Cumu~nc

1’, “,

h’,

Page 10: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary
Page 11: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

MC’< Vol 2-l. No. 3 t.tl-1: IT Al. March I. IY%.737-Yt PRt\IARb ASG1OPtASl-Y .M.yu fllK~~SItYXYStS 1 VtlEN<-t

GUSTO (22) 1993 tic-T

SK-SC hqwin SK’IV kpin (PA- IV hd SK*tPA-IV tqain SK+lqwim IPt~tkpm SK IPA SK IPA AtsAc AFSAC IPA

f I3

APSAC‘ IP\

II! Xl

SK ARAl

IC I.*

.:

?!tlh

u*

,: ,: 3

Page 12: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

748 LmJETAL JACC Vd. 27. No. 3 PRtMARY ANGlOPL45lY AND T?iROMROI.YSIS EVIDENCE March I. 1996~737-50

Page 13: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

JACK Vol. 27. No. 3 March I. 1’4%7’47-VI

LIEU ET AL PRIMARY ANGIOPUSTY AND THROMBDLYSIS EVlDtNCE

749

References* 1. KramMz HM. Fric!,iqcr (;c‘, w t.F, Ler TH. Rouan GW, Goldman L

Rdatanship of age ritb cligiblify for h”,h”~K therapy and IrKlltalily ~lary prlknts with suspcc#cd ate myocardial infambo. J Am Gctia!r sot wM;42:127-31.

L Himbert D, Juliud J-M. Stq C. CI al primsrj coronary aq@phwy for mlc nyaardd infar&m with amtraiadii~ion IO rlvomholyrir. Am J cardid 1~71377-81.

3. Cq DR. Fm HZ, Bawma JD. et al. Ouwdpatknts+Ih acute Iliyocdal idardba who arc irKi* for thranhoIylic tbrrdpy. Ann Intern Mcd 1991;115:17~7.

4.BchorEAbmrdcrL~Act~.Frtqurocyoflacdt~omh~k ihcra~ in acute mpardial infarction in Israel. J Am Cdl Cardiol1991:611: 1291-4.

5. Ahham R Maynard C. Cnguein MD. 0bufk.a M, Riuhw JL Kcnoedy JW.llKWCWllW~~mpcardlidbrfvction~giUYydcmC~ dqmlmcnt tissue plsmiqcn mivalor treatment uid Am J Card4 1990.65:12%3-303.

6. Kattsm BW. Heriia J, EdvarQMl N. Emanuckwn H. Splin hi. HJdmar- sm A. El@ilily for intravemus thmmtwh% in suspected acute mpardial

. idadon. Ciiat~ 1990.823 140-6. 7. ISIS2 CdIabontrvc Group. Raodomi& trial of iotraveoous suep~otinau.

oral aspkin. bah of IKith among 17.137 c%cs d arspcclcd yule fnyaxbl inhrccan: ISIS2. iTanccl 198&335:349-60.

8. Murray N. LF 1. Layme C. &lam R. Whai proportion d priena with EdhI inhrclm arc soit&lc far kambdps? & Heart J 198757:

9. Jrygcr ID. Murray RG. Davim MK Ljnkr WA. Fliot EJ. Eli@ility for hmbdytii thsaqq in acute mpxardiaI infambn. l.anccll987;134-5.

IO. GAdq RI, Gore JM, m 1. et al. -sic sha& after acutc mpxrdd idatdion. lacidcccc and mutalily fran a onnmuniry-wi& penpat& 15% to 1988. N w J Mcd 1991;325:1117-22.

II. ~M,AwkMnJ,RcsmaaH,etal.Riskkkntifkalioaa~thcrimc dadmiitoamwycarcunhinparimatiRapcacdmpcudkl idar&n Am Heart J 1988;11Q1212-7.

tZ~$kdwaaRKillipT.SbocLlfieraru~mpardirl~uccion.A dinial and hm+wnic p&k. Am J Grdbl l97&&5%-64.

13. de Boer MJ. Howotjc JCA, Owwarger JP. Reii‘m $ Sqapnw H. Z#llYF.Immtdi&awoaUySUgi+SQvenrSiIllnvnaur in acute myadial iduftion: kl ventricular eprtion *G nmdity ad rddambn J Am Cdl Cudid Y#&Z3:1004-8.

14. Grioca CL Bmm KF, Mam J. et al. A aqar& dbmdialc a@puy tidl Ihrocabdyrk therapy for yule lqocadial inhrcran. N En@ J Med lW3;12&673-9.

16. RiheiroEE.S&alA.&m&oRnaf.Rar&m&dtriaiofdircaeormury angb@aq - inrmcnous sucpmhw q awe mpcardial idamion.

J Am cdl Cardid 1 W3;22r376-80. 17. Mni T, f&saka H. Kmun T, N&yo&i M. Iny-term fo!Jowup d

patients UcaIcd with illtnmmnuy IhNmhdysis of pcrcuIancous Indullbi- NJ ammary qiopkty for acute qccardirl infarction. J GrdbllWlz21: 323-36

IS. ONeii W, limmis GC. Ekwdilbn PD. et al. A paspcaiw rar&nii di&al trial d inuaaswwy strcptakina5c YCrsu5 awnnary angiqby for aanc !nyoa&d infarction N Engl J Med lQ&3l4:&12-8.

19. RqcaWJ.Dcaal.S,MoorePB.eidCanpuicondprimuya+plauy wwnthrcmbolytLthmpyforwrtnr,uardialinfamioa.AmJGrdid Iyw;74:lll-8.

21. Gruppo ttalho per b Studio ddla Sqawvhcar oell’tsfuto Micurdks. GISSI-3: c#ccu d liriaopri ad trans&ti Ml tittatt sin& and

logcthcrun hut mortality zad venlrkufar fun&e after acute myuwdlal infarction. bncet 19943343: I 115-22.

22. Tk GUSTG lnvutigaton Ar mtcmalbnal randomircd trirl ~anpuiq four thK&dytii strategies for acute qourdial infarctbn N EqJ J Med lW3;32’?67>82

23. ISIS-3 Cdl&xaovc Group. fSLS3: a ra&mixd aqarkon d nrcpoki- nasc n tissue plasminogen a&valor and d aspirin pfur hcpuin m wn aboc rmfmg 41.299 caxs d wrpcacd aMc w infarc&m. LIuxt 1m339z754-69

14. Andem JL wer LT. Sowmcn SG. et al. Aoisoqlsc wsus atupl*u in acute mywardii infarctna: wmpralivt erects on kH ventrisulu function. mxbidny and I-day cownary rntry parency. J Am Coil cudid WZ:M753-66.

3. Ncuhau~ KL van f&n R. Tehbc U. et al. lmprwcd thrcmhot+ in acolt nqwcardial infar& with frcwb&.i adminiwatan of ali-: res&, of tk n-PA-AF’SAC @cncy study (TAPS). i Am 6u Cardiol l~l%&tf& 91.

26. A&non JL Soremen SG. Morcn, FL CI al. Muhkzoltr pawnq awl d intraveoow anistreplav compared tith Itqt&in+u in acute oryaardial infarciion. Circulation IWl;H3:l?6-40.

27. Gmppo Itahaou per b Studio della Sqnaniwnza wlllnfarto Mimrdm. GISSI-?: a facmial nndanircd trial d ahcplasc nrsu wcpokirw and kparin - no hcparin among IL490 palknls wiul &WC lllpar&I infarctica. LuDa 1990,36%>71.

2% Rcgcn WI. Baim DS. Gore JM. et al. &q&on of immtdiacr was&. delrycd inwivc, and cmstwatiuc stratcgim ah tkauc-fypr plasmioogen aclivator. ksulls d Ihc llumh+s in Myaudial lofamion (TiMI) Ptbw II-A rrial. CiilaIioa 1990.81:1457-76

29 Thcl-lMlStu&yGmrp.Gxqnriwmdirmrivcyd ccmma~sualcgks after mamrnt with inrnvcmus time pl2mimp xmata in acute mywdial infardiat N Engl J MaJ 1X793~618-27.

3O.ChevhJH.IClvncrudG.RnbmrRttd~~~ idarctka(llMI)trial,PhrYI:a cxmtpkmbcl8uuln-liwc @asminogcn mintor and intmrDan sucpfokinasc. c- 1987;76: 142-54.

33.‘lbc~Futvm~c~kttlCtT~~~.Vcr) rarlythn&+tkthc~insquncdrvtc~diatidaxtiauAmJ Grdid lwo$5:4ol-7.

34. llaami J-P. Mrbcmtn J.GscagwsJ.ctalLdrqow&nl idamsiztadpmwimdkftvcauicxlxhuhon~dy- rioadAPSACioqaar&lmfam&AmJCar&d1~I8&23A.

35. VandeWerfF.AmoldAERslmbawux t&uc~rtiv;llaand sizcdol~MvmidarfumxbaandPuvinlinancmpcudLl infamim BMJ Is@297:1374-8.

36. Kmmdy JW, Manin GV. Davk KB CI al. Tbc Wearm Wmbqam in-~bacuk~aaIdvlidamimRaQoiredtrid cimdati 19BB;Tllws52.

Page 14: Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: An evidence summary

750 LIEU fin-AL JAW Vol. 27, No. 3 PRIMARY ANGlOt’LA%lT AND lHROM3OLYSIS EVIDENCE March 1. IpoO:737-W

43. lk ISAM Study Group p. pmspcctivr trial of mtnwrous strquokinasc in amtc myrxardial infarction. N En@ J Mod Icl[M;!! 21465-71.

44. Hbbud MD. H~IIYZ$ DRI. Bailey KR et al. Pcrcutaxsus trans!ca:i;:al s-7 in patk~~ with amnic shock. 1 Am Cdl C’ardul

4.5. cviocb GM. Etik SG, Lee L et al. Catink dkxk romplicaling aculc myou&l infarction: the use of wrcwry an&&sty and th; intcgr&n of I& new summ &vim into paiicnt management. J Am Coil Cardiol 1992gw7:~3.

46. Yammmto H. Hawub Y. Oka Y. et al. Eficxy of percutaneous tnnsfumi-

47. t, L, &I R. B&r TM. ct ai. Muhicenrrr regi~ry of aqinplrrty therap? of ankgcnk slm& irdial md lon~km suwival. J Am Culi Car&d 1991:17599-t&3.

4% Bmdii BR Weintrauh RA Stuckw TD. et al. Outc~m, of dircx! coronarv $+4&y for.acute myocanlial iniaytion in cpndi&tcs ark! rbnundiitcs

dtnmb&w herim Am J Cardlol l991:67:7-12 49. SCOIW GW. &ithcrford~BD. McCcoahay DR. C’I al. Dirccl cwonq anpi*

pky in acult nyxdial infarct+w: wtcomc in patients ulth sit@ wwl diwasc. J Am Co11 ml 1990;15:534-43.

541. Kahn JK RutJwfo,d BD. McConahay DR. ct .+I. Rsultr of prim+ angbpbq for acult mywardial infarction in patients with multivwcl amnury utcty daCre. J Am Cdl Cardbl 199R.l6:1tN9-90.

51. OKccfc JHJ, Ruthcrfrud BD, MKonahay DR. CI al. Early ad late resultr d comury aam wittm~ antcredcnt thwrihdytic thcra~y for rutc mymrdid infanxbn. Am J Cardbl 19119.64:1221-M.

52 Hakcr GC. V’ckl RR Mcinhardt S. ct al. Emqcncy ungbpfasty in acute aumiot mynmdial infambn. Am Hun J 1989,11R:I ISJ-Qt.

53. Irr L Bates ER Pitt B, Walton Jh Laufcr N. ONeill WW. Rm~t~~ws tnnhnid m aqbplWy imprmm survival in awte myocardial i&r&m mr@iatcd hy carrtmgcnic shock. Circulation 1911R;7R:I.U5-51.

54. St& X!L CkliU XM. Hitiara T. CI al. Suwival and cardiac cvcnt rat-s in tlut fimt m after CrUC*cncy mrotlary angio+y for acute mymrdial infuaiou. J Am Cdt Cardiol 1988:11:1141-9,

55. KiUip T, KiatbaU JT. Treatment of myoardirl infarctiun in a coronary cart II&. Am J Cardbl 1%7Q1’k457-64.

56. de Boer Ml. nn Hout EA. Lent AL Swaoranata Ii. Hrrumric JCA. tijlstn F. Cc&cfectiwncss analysis of p&&y coronary angiopkrsty n5. chmMpii ftx acult rnywardlal infarctmo. Am J Car&b) 1~;7h:K~-2.

57. Nunn C b’Ncill W. Rothhaum 0. cl al. Primary angbpfasry for mywardial infmctii irnpwcs kq-mrm wvivak PAMI-I folbw-up [ahswami. J Am cdl cardid. la Plrs

59. O’Hurchu B. Grrh El. Rccdcr GS Etaii KR. Hokncs DR. Late ou~mmc aher pnarcumur tratdumioal wonmy qioplaty during xulc myxxar- did infamb~~. Am J Cardlol lW3;R:634-9.

60. Btrucbupp GD. Vac& JL Rdmck W. Managcwnt mmparuon fw acu~c mpardnl infUam: direct a@p&sty versus qucotial thromlrot+- an-. Ala f-km J 19wnz37-42

61. Tcrrin ML Williams Do. Kkiman NS. rl al. Tw. and three-year rcwlts uf

~hc Thromhdyris in M-dial Infarctrun (TfMI) Phase II climcal trial. t ‘..n Cdl Cardrol 1993:2.?: 1763-72

62. Volpi A. Dev.~a C. Franzosi MG. et al. Drtcnninano of Cmonth murtality in wvivors of w,,rcardial infarction after thrombwi: rcwlt~ of the GISSI-2 data haw. Crrculalion I993:I:416-29.

63. Ccrqucira MD. Maynard C. Ritchic JL Davis KB. Kcnncdy JW. Innp-tcnn survi~l in 6th parrcnt~ from the Western Washington Strcptoirinti in Mywardial Infarction trials. J Am Cdl Cardid l’XJ?;M:I452-9.

6%. Ta$or GJ. Moses HW. Katholi RE. ct al. Six-year survival after comoary thromhoty& and carh rcvauulariutiun for &UC myccardial infarction. Am J Cardiol )992;Bl:26-?4J.

65. Amotd AER, Sirnoons ML Van de Wcrf F, et al. Recomtwtanr t&c-type plnminogen activator and immediate angioptasty in acuk myocardial in- farction: ON-year follow-up. Cirwlalion 1992tXxl I I-M.

h(l. Smuun~ ML Vas J. Tijwn JGP. cl al. h~~~-lrrm benefit of early fhromb~tyric therapy in paticnb wi:h xutc myvxdial infarctkm: S year fulkwup of a hial aducrcd by the lnrcrunivcmity Cardiology Institute d the Ncthcrlands. J Am Cdl Cardiil 19t?hl1:IryP-l5.

67 C.&S RM.Topd Et. George BS, tf al. One-year arimmc after therapy with t&x p!asm~m~:n acriva,or: rcpun from the Thrurnhofysis and Angbplasty in Myowdial Infar&n trial. Am Heart J 1o9o.luP:~-tl5.

68. Wilcw RG. van dcr Liw G. Olwn CG. Jcnxn G. Skcnc AM. Hampon JR. Effects of altcplaw in acute myocardial infarction: &rmmth results frwn the ASSET study. Lamxt 19u1;33Sll75-8.

69. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dcila Strcpluhirtmi ndl’lnfarto Miccatdii (CISSI). fort&-term effects ot intravcnw thrmnholysis in rute myocardial infdrctiun: final rcporl of the CISSI study. Laxxt 1%7;2:171-4.

IO Volpi A. fIcVita C. Fnruosi MG. il al. Predictors d nonfatal rcinfarcticm in survivors of mycardii inlarctiou after lhrombdyds: rcwlts of the Gruppo ltalianu per b Studii Della soprawivcnw ncll’lnfarco Mkatdim (GISSI-2) Data Base. J Am Cdl Car&d 1994;24~6C@-15.

71. kc&r CS. Baitey KR. Gcrsh BJ. Hotmcs DR. Chrirtiimon I. Gihhoos RJ. C-t comparbm of immcdiitt angioplml) wrw thrumk+is followed hy CCWN~I~~C thcnpf for acute nqoardiat infamti a nnbomiud pospcc- live trial. Mayo Ctin Rot 1994$9.5-I2

-2. Mark DB. Hlatky MA. CXY RM, et al. Cost eBxtivcncss of thrornbotytii therapy with tissue ~inogcn activator ncompamd with stmckinax fcu acute mywardial infarction. N Engl J MuJ l%S;332:14lR-24.

73. Naybr CD, Jaglal SB. Impact of inrrawrcus thromtmh& on shmt-:crm coronary rcwcularizatbn ratcx a mcta-analysis. JAMA 199tka697-7U2.

74. Zijlsira F. C Bar MJ, Hauntjc JCA, Reiha S. Rcibcr JHC. Suryapn~ta H. A mmpariwn of immediate coronary angbplasty with intnvtnour strcptdiinau in rutc myocardial infardbn. N Engl J Mcd 399.332&6&l-4.

75. White HD. Barhash Ct. M&n hi. et at. After correcting for worse baxlinc character&t= women trcatcd with thromtrdytic thcnpy for acute myaar- d~infarction~thcymemort~itywd~ty~men~f~a higlw ilridrncc of hcnwrhagic wc&e. Cirnrlptbn ly93;Rs:X@7-IW.

76. Cl JM. Sban M. Prbc TR. ct al. lntraccrohral hcmontugc, cctcbnl infarction. and soMural hcrnatoma aher WIG mwcwdii infarc~iw and thr~ic thmpy in the Thromhol@ in Myo&dial Infarction Study. Thtomhotysis in Myocardial Infarction. Flw.c If, pibt and dinial trial Circulation 1991;8?~4#-59.