3
Press Release: June 23, 2015 Mayor Jim Gitz The City Council and I are disappointed that AFSCME chose not to ratify the City’s contract proposal. We believe that our last offer gives the employees a contract that is fair and comparable to their colleagues in other municipalities as well as fiscally responsible to the residents of Freeport. We would like to reassure residents that should the union decide to strike that we have a contingency plan in place to ensure that no one experiences a loss of vital City services. It is a difficult time for us as we do not want to be at odds with any of our employees, but we have to also balance our responsibilities to other employees and the good people of Freeport who pay their salaries with their taxes. With this in mind, we will be ready to hire replacements and contract out the bargaining unit’s work in the event of a strike. The City appreciates the support and understanding of the public at this time. The issues which remain unresolved are few. The main topic which the union refuses to accept is that the City’s offer includes changes to both health insurance premiums and the healthcare plan itself. The City has already adopted the same plan for its non- bargaining and management employees, and all retirees. The plan and premiums had not been significantly changed for over ten years. After lengthy discussions with the City Council, the City’s position is simple. It is unfair to ask the taxpayers to pay for a better insurance plan for City employees than they can afford for themselves. Over the past five years there has been a rise in the portion of healthcare paid by the City from $2.5 million to $3.5 million. The union employee’s share is set by percentage, but limited by a 1

Press release by Mayor Jim Gitz

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Press release by Mayor Jim Gitz

Citation preview

June 9, 2015, 2015 Proposal

Press Release:June 23, 2015Mayor Jim Gitz

The City Council and I are disappointed that AFSCME chose not to ratify the Citys contract proposal. We believe that our last offer gives the employees a contract that is fair and comparable to their colleagues in other municipalities as well as fiscally responsible to the residents of Freeport.

We would like to reassure residents that should the union decide to strike that we have a contingency plan in place to ensure that no one experiences a loss of vital City services. It is a difficult time for us as we do not want to be at odds with any of our employees, but we have to also balance our responsibilities to other employees and the good people of Freeport who pay their salaries with their taxes. With this in mind, we will be ready to hire replacements and contract out the bargaining units work in the event of a strike. The City appreciates the support and understanding of the public at this time.

The issues which remain unresolved are few. The main topic which the union refuses to accept is that the Citys offer includes changes to both health insurance premiums and the healthcare plan itself. The City has already adopted the same plan for its non-bargaining and management employees, and all retirees. The plan and premiums had not been significantly changed for over ten years.

After lengthy discussions with the City Council, the Citys position is simple. It is unfair to ask the taxpayers to pay for a better insurance plan for City employees than they can afford for themselves.

Over the past five years there has been a rise in the portion of healthcare paid by the City from $2.5 million to $3.5 million. The union employees share is set by percentage, but limited by a dollar amount cap. This cap was reached years ago, so that now when healthcare costs rise the full impact is on the taxpayer.

There is an additional impact due to the richness of the healthcare plan itself. The Citys proposal phases in the new plan over a two (2) year period of time and makes it the same as the non-bargaining and management employees, and retirees. Quite frankly, the proposed plan is still a much better plan than many in Freeport have and it has been referred to on the City Council floor as a Cadillac Plan.

The Unions last proposal insisted on premium caps, regardless of how much the taxpayer might have to absorb if healthcare costs continue to rise and only offered nominal concessions on the plan itself.

The City offered a wage increase of 2% for each of the remaining years of a three (3) year agreement. In addition, recognizing that there would be a financial impact to the employees with the changes to the healthcare plan, the City offered a lump sum payment of $1,800.00 per employee as a signing incentive.

Further, the City increased the amount of money which goes into their Post Employment Health Plan by an additional % of their salary per year for all employees with 10 or more years of service.

The City has not offered a wage increase for the year of the contract which has already passed because we cant retroactively implement the insurance plan or premiums and those savings to the taxpayer can never be realized.

There is some minor additional language regarding how combining services with another governmental unit to save taxpayer monies would affect the contract, which the Union has rejected.

We appreciate our residents patience while we try to continue to work toward an amicable solution, while being mindful stewards of your tax dollars.

1