Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This article was downloaded by: [Washburn University]On: 17 October 2014, At: 17:50Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Research in ChildhoodEducationPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujrc20
Preservice Childhood EducationTeachers' Perceptions of InstructionalPractices for Developing Young Children'sInterest in ReadingAli Ahmad Al-Barakat a & Ruba Fahmi Bataineh ba Umm Al-Qura University , Makkah Al-Mukaramah, Saudi Arabiab Yarmouk University , Irbid, JordanPublished online: 21 Mar 2011.
To cite this article: Ali Ahmad Al-Barakat & Ruba Fahmi Bataineh (2011) Preservice ChildhoodEducation Teachers' Perceptions of Instructional Practices for Developing Young Children'sInterest in Reading, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25:2, 177-193, DOI:10.1080/02568543.2011.556520
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2011.556520
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever orhowsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arisingout of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25: 177–193, 2011Copyright © Association for Childhood Education InternationalISSN: 0256-8543 print / 2150-2641 onlineDOI: 10.1080/02568543.2011.556520
Preservice Childhood Education Teachers’ Perceptionsof Instructional Practices for Developing Young Children’s
Interest in Reading
Ali Ahmad Al-BarakatUmm Al-Qura University, Makkah Al-Mukaramah, Saudi Arabia
Ruba Fahmi BatainehYarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
Within the context of the increasing attention to reading in educational contexts around the globe,this study uses a semistructured interview to explore 93 Jordanian preservice teachers’ percep-tions of instructional practices for developing young children’s interest in reading. The participantsreported on 7 major teacher practices they perceive as instrumental in developing young children’sinterest in reading. These relate to teaching and learning settings, designing reading materials,establishing a classroom library, making use of the local library, using reinforcement, establish-ing good relationships with parents, and using information and communication technology as ateaching/learning resource. Based on these findings, several implications for professional practice,professional development, and future research are put forth.
Keywords: reading, instructional practices, perceptions, preservice teaching, Jordan
Over the past few years, a major trend has come to focus on developing preservice childhoodteachers’ practices to develop young children’s interest in reading during the field experiencecomponent of teacher education (Collins, 2005; Louden & Rohl, 2006). This trend is supportedby research that demonstrates the effectiveness of deliberately addressing instructional practicesfor promoting learning for all children (Bataineh & Al-Barakat, 2009; Pajares, 1992; Wilke,2004).
The development of preservice teachers’ practices is closely linked with how they perceivethemselves and their role as teachers (Pajares, 1992; Wubbels, 1992). When preservice childhoodteachers come to teacher education programs, they bring with them a set of perceptions abouthow children’s interest in reading can best be developed.
Nevertheless, even though teachers’ perceptions are colored by the experiences they wentthrough during their own schooling (Calderhead & Robson, 1991; Feiman-Nemser, 1983;Haberman, 1985; Pajares, 1992; Stuart & Thurlow, 2000), they also may be developed, or at
Submitted October 24, 2009; accepted August 24, 2010.Address correspondence to Ruba F. Bataineh, Ph.D., Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of
Education, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan 211-63. E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
178 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
least honed, through teacher education. Teacher education programs are essentially the first stepin the teacher’s professional development. They allow preservice teachers an outlet not onlyto construct new perceptions but also to acquire knowledge and skills (Wilke, 2004), whichmay constitute the foundation for quality instructional practices for developing young children’sinterest in reading (Pajares, 1992; Wilke, 2004).
Consequently, developing young children’s interest in reading is dependent on the effective-ness of teacher education programs that allow preservice teachers opportunities not only to formor modify perceptions about reading, but also to actually practice developing young children’sinterest in reading. Empirical evidence shows (e.g., Al-Barakat, 2004, 2010; Ihmeideh, 2009)that a more effective teacher education program is one that provides preservice teachers withopportunities to form not only assumptions about the teaching/learning process, but also actualinstructional practices for their future classrooms. Thus, preservice practica generally constitutea catalyst and an invaluable opportunity for preservice teachers to move, through actual instruc-tion, from mere theoretical assumptions about developing young children’s interest in reading toactual instructional practices for doing so.
To this effect, a growing body of research (e.g., Feiman-Nemser, 1983; Haberman, 1985;Pajares, 1992; Stuart & Thurlow, 2000) emphasizes that teacher educators must not only addressissues related to the structure and content of teacher education programs, but also consider theperceptions that preservice teachers bring with them to teacher education and how they developduring practicum. Therefore, there seems to be a need to explore preservice teachers’ perceptionsabout instructional practices for developing young children’s interest in reading, which is theprimary aim of the current research.
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
That all children should be able to read is a matter of universal consensus, for not a hint ofcontroversy surrounds the growing concern for equipping young children with not only the abilityto read but also the interest in reading. This suggests that better reading instruction is urgentlyneeded, which, in turn, necessitates that teacher education programs better prepare teachers sothat young children can not only learn to read better but also develop a much-needed interest inreading (Bataineh & Al-Barakat, 2009).
For example, education reform movements around the globe emphasize the teacher’s sub-stantial role in engaging children in a variety of language-related experiences to develop theirability to read (Al-Barakat, 2010; Bataineh & Al-Barakat, 2009; Burgess, Lundgren, & Pianta,2001). Besides, no longer are these reforms concerned only with producing a generation capableof identifying familiar words in print. Rather, they seek to develop a genuine inherent interestin reading as an enjoyable, lifelong activity (Freedman-De Vito, 2004; Roberts & Wilson, 2006;Sainsbury, 2004). For example, Freedman-De Vito (2004) claimed that reading is important tochildren, because not only is it
necessary for survival in the world of schools and (later on) universities, but in adult life as well. Theability to learn about new subjects and find helpful information on anything from health problemsand consumer protection to more academic research into science or the arts depends on the ability toread. (p. 1)
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 179
There also exists empirical evidence that the more children read, the better readers they become,and the more they are read to, the greater is their interest in mastering reading. To this effect,Moats (1999) reported evidence that
a child who doesn’t learn the reading basics early is unlikely to learn them at all. Any child whodoesn’t learn to read early and well will not easily master other skills and knowledge, and is unlikelyto ever flourish in school or in life. (p. 5)
However, what relatively little research exists on effective instructional practices for improvingchildren’s reading and interest in reading provides some insights into the matter. For example,Bishop, Berryman, and Richardson (2001), who examined effective instructional strategies andmaterials for improving 5-year-old children’s reading and interest in reading, reported that effec-tive teachers attempted to set up an “oral rich environment,” usually through the use of children’sprior or real-life experiences and language-rich environment, to extend their vocabulary andunderstanding.
Moreover, despite reports that poor reading attitudes do not necessarily correlate with lowachievement (Ogle et al., 2003), a good body of research (e.g., Wang, 2000) links reading attitudewith literacy development. In addition to reports that attitudes toward reading begin to declineand continue to do so in the intermediate grades (e.g., McKenna & Kear, 1990; McKenna, Kear,& Ellsworth, 1995; Sperling & Head, 2002), research (e.g., Richek, List, & Lerner, 1989) con-sistently pointed out that attitudes affect children’s motivation and subsequent achievement byincreasing the amount of time they engage in reading (McKenna et al., 1995; Richek et al.,1989). For example, Roberts and Wilson (2006) claimed that “whether children read or not isdetermined by their attitudes toward reading. If children do not like reading or they think thatreading is boring, their negative attitude toward reading will hinder their reading improvement”(p. 1). The literature provides further evidence that instilling positive attitudes and promotinginterest are among the most important school-related practices for developing reading ability(Grann & Lloyd, 1997; Swanson, 1998). Due to their close contact with children, childhoodeducation teachers are the most likely to spark children’s interest in reading, which begins withcapitalizing on their natural curiosity and desire to discover. To do so, teachers should structurereading events to suit children’s interests (Beers, 1996) and help them catch the enthusiasm forbooks (Hildebrand, 1997), as well as ensuring that learning environments are abundant with printmaterials to spark and foster their interest in reading (Beach, 1996).
RATIONALE, PURPOSE, AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Researchers have made claims about the teacher’s potentially central role in developing chil-dren’s interest in reading to ensure a generation of critical readers (Fadolallah, 1995; Grann &Lloyd, 1997). The authors hypothesize that preservice childhood education teachers possess ade-quate theoretical knowledge of practices that may effectively develop young children’s interest inreading, which, through their collaboration with cooperating inservice teachers during practicum,may be a catalyst for improving the cooperating teacher’s and their own instructional practice.
Despite a plethora of educational literature attesting to the value of children’s literature andreading interests, it seems that finding ways to effectively develop children’s interest in readinghas not been adequately addressed. By the same token, to the best of the authors’ knowledge,
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
180 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
no research has examined the teacher’s role in developing young children’s interest in reading.To this effect, Bataineh and Al-Barakat (2005) claimed that teachers cannot develop young chil-dren’s reading interest without actually understanding their own potential role in the readingprocess.
The current study is designed to explore preservice teachers’ perceptions of instructional prac-tices for developing young children’s interest in reading. The findings are hoped to empowerteachers, both in pre- and inservice practice, to develop pupils’ interest in reading, especiallyin light of children’s complaints that teachers, with such routine practices as assigning too muchhomework and not offering any incentives for readers, hardly ever contribute to sparking an inter-est in reading (Bataineh & Al-Barakat, 2005). To achieve its purpose, the authors seek answers tothe question, “What are preservice teachers’ perceptions of instructional practices for developingpupils’ interest in reading during practicum?”
The authors have opted to target preservice, rather than inservice, teachers for two reasons:(1) the respondents were selected from those enrolled in their final year practicum at the programin which the authors teach, a transitional stage between teacher training and actual teaching prac-tice, and (2) these teachers are believed to be change agents, as they are about to join the laborforce. As they stand now, each works alongside one or more cooperating teachers. The authorsare hoping that these preservice teachers’ proximity to and collaboration with their cooperatingteachers would constitute an outlet through which each may affect and be affected by the other.In other words, the authors are hoping that the cooperating teachers will not only train the respon-dents, but also hone their own practices to better promote their students’ reading and inform thepractices of their younger wards.
In addition to developing the research base in reading-related instructional practices, there isa pressing need to examine relationships between these practices and children’s reading develop-ment. The authors hope to pave the way for such research through identifying the instructionalpractices perceived to affect pupils’ interest in reading. Subsequent research may probe into therelationship between these practices and the children’s actual interest in reading and developmentas readers.
METHOD, SAMPLING, INSTRUMENT, AND PROCEDURES
Even though quantitative methods allow practitioners to collect and statistically assess largeamounts of data, one may need to collect descriptively rich data that these methods are inca-pable of obtaining. As qualitative methods focus more on understanding an individual’s views ofthe world and his or her experiences in a particular context and point in time (Merriam, 2002), theauthors strive to gain an in-depth understanding (Bogdan & Biklen, 2003) of preservice teachers’perceptions of instructional practices for developing young children’s interest in reading withouthaving to worry about generalizing the findings beyond this particular inquiry, which aims togenerate rich, descriptive details from a relatively small group of participants (Merriam, 2002).
The methodology used in this research is the interview, involving a detailed examinationof preservice teachers’ perceptions of instructional practices for developing young children’sinterest in reading. The semistructured interview is a widely used tool to access participants’experiences and their inner perceptions, attitudes, and feelings of reality. It is known to encour-age two-way communication between the interviewer and interviewee, not to mention provide
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 181
researchers with the answers to their questions and the reasons for those answers (Zhang &Wildemuth, 2006).
Furthermore, the advantages of using the interview are a greater depth of response and free-dom for the interviewer to extend and probe more deeply into the responses of the sample (Cohen,Manion, & Morrison, 2000; Robson, 1997); a more personal nature, compared, for example, toquestionnaires, which is bound to result in better response rates; an ability to obtain more com-plex information and greater understanding; more control by the interviewer over the flow andsequence of questions, for it is often important to ask a particular question after others have beenanswered (List, 2005); and the ability to modify the interview schedule after the initial results,which is impossible, say, with a questionnaire.
However, the interview suffers from limitations. The most important limitations are thetime and relative difficulty of data analysis, fatigue, and the potential bias resulting from per-sonal involvement with interviewees (Breakwell, Hammond, & Fife-Schaw, 1995; Wimmer &Dominick, 1997).
The respondents of the study are 93 preservice childhood education teachers enrolled in a 12-week, school-based practicum in their final semester of the undergraduate program in ElementaryEducation at the College of Education at Yarmouk University (Jordan). During practicum, pre-service teachers are offered the opportunity to apply learning theory to practice as they engagein activities ranging from observation to application and evaluation of classroom management,teaching, learning, and assessment under the supervision of a cooperating teacher and a col-lege supervisor. Usually, they observe for 2 to 4 weeks, assist cooperating teachers for 2 to 4weeks, and teach unassisted for 4 to 8 weeks—depending on the student’s skills and abilities.As part of the practicum, all preservice teachers participate in a weekly seminar session withtheir college supervisor in which they reflect on their practice and get assistance on an as-neededbasis.
Each of these teachers has studied a minimum of 105 credit hours on such topics as childdevelopment, psychology, and curriculum development, in addition to theoretical prerequisitesto the practicum. The prerequisites introduced them to the major approaches to childhood edu-cation and the basics of curriculum design. The graduates of this program, known as childhoodeducation teachers, customarily become teachers of all subject matters (viz., Arabic language,mathematics, science, social studies, and religion), except English, to 1st- through 4th- basicgrade pupils in Jordanian public and private schools.
The authors designed an interview schedule1 based on their collective experience and athorough review of the literature. The initial interview schedule, which consisted of eight ques-tions, was validated by a jury of seven professors of early childhood education, curriculum andinstruction, measurement and evaluation, language teaching, and applied linguistics, who madea number of suggestions that resulted in modifying the wording of two questions, adding onequestion, combining two questions into one, and deleting one question altogether.
The resulting schedule consisted of seven questions, piloted on 13 respondents who wereexcluded from the sample of the study. Among other questions, the respondents were asked tospeculate on the type of practices they would use to develop young children’s interest in readingin their own teaching practice the following year, and whether they believe that instructionalpractices could actually contribute to the development of children’s interest in reading.
To collect the data, the authors obtained the interviewees’ consent to participate and arrangedthe interview appointments. The respondents were informed about the study and the purpose
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
182 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
of the interview and ensured of the confidentiality of their responses. The interviewer madeserious attempts to establish rapport and put each interviewee at ease before conducting theactual interview. The length of the interview, at which one or both authors were present, rangedbetween 20 and 35 minutes per respondent. Each interview was audiotaped and immediatelytranscribed (with the interviewee’s prior consent), and each transcript was shown to the respectiverespondent to verify whether it truthfully represented his or her responses. The respondents alsowere asked if they wanted to add or delete anything, but they all indicated their satisfactionwith their initial responses, which may be taken as additional evidence of the reliability of thecollected data.
With a 16-day interval between the two administrations, the authors analyzed the transcriptsand found no substantial differences in the participants’ responses in the two interviews. Then,the authors sought the help of a third colleague from the Department of Elementary Education,who did an independent analysis of the transcripts. The two analyses were compared, and onlyminimal differences were noted, which was taken as an indication of the reliability of theinterview schedule and the analysis of the data it collected.
To analyze the data, the authors used grounded theory, whereby no a priori classification wasused, but rather the categories and the subcategories of the analysis emerged from the data asfollows:
• Each transcript was typed on a separate sheet of paper.• Each transcript was carefully read and the responses coded.• Similar ideas were put into subcategories that were, in turn, lumped into main categories.• A colleague from the Department of Elementary Education was asked to retrace Steps 2 and
3 above to establish the reliability of the analysis. No substantial differences were detectedon either the sub- or main categories.
• Frequencies and percentages were calculated for the responses, along with the subcate-gories produced by the analysis.
• The data analysis revealed a number of findings, which are presented below.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
The initial analysis of the data reveals that the respondents perceived teacher practices to affectyoung children’s interest in reading in seven major categories. These categories were labeledas teaching and learning practices, designing reading materials, establishing a classroom library,making use of the local library, using reinforcement, establishing good relationships with parents,and using information and communication technology. Each of these categories is presented anddiscussed below.
Teaching and Learning Practices
More than 75% of the respondents perceived classroom practices to play a key role in encourag-ing young children to form an interest in and good attitudes toward reading, as shown in excerpts1 through 4 below.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 183
Teachers should offer young children a range of opportunities to converse about what theyread. (1)
If the teacher’s instructional practices guide his/her pupils to think about the questionsraised in the classroom and give them opportunities to read literature to find answers to theirinquires, I think that this teacher will very well contribute to developing these children’sinterest in reading. (2)
To be honest, I believe that, of all people, the teacher is the only one who can developyoung children’s interest in reading. Today, I have given my class various books to givethem ideas about what they can do to help people who are visually impaired. (3)
Teachers should strive to steer their pupils to read literature to consolidate the topicscontained in the school curriculum. (4)
Excerpts 1 through 4 above indicate that the respondents perceived the teacher to play an instru-mental role in developing children’s interest in reading. These excerpts, as well as others given bythe respondents, point out certain teacher practices that contribute to developing young learners’interest in reading. Most recurrent among these are the following:
• Providing children with opportunities to talk about what they read inside and outside theclassroom, individually and in groups (one-on-one, pairs, small groups, and whole groups).This also relates to the teacher’s role in encouraging children to read different types ofmaterials, which is consistent with Morrow’s (1992, 2001) claim that the discussion of sto-ries is one of the best procedures to contribute not only to increasing children’s willingnessto read, but also to developing their personalities as active rather than passive recipients oftheir teachers’ ideas. This is especially important if one keeps in mind that a major aim ofchildren’s literature is not only to encourage a love of reading, but also to develop youngchildren’s personalities (Al-Barakat, 2004; Allington & Guice, 1998; Lehman, 1996).
• Using different media for presenting enjoyable and illustration-rich reading materials tofoster comprehension. If children become avid readers because they enjoy reading, theywill most likely turn to literature for a variety of purposes as they grow older (e.g., pleasure,advice). This result demonstrates the importance of using pictures and illustrations to helpyoung children learn to read, which is further corroborated by Tronbacke and Ingemar(1996), who claim that pictures not only develop young learners’ interest in reading butalso positively affect their language learning, particularly those who are at the midlevel andlower-level reading ability levels (Daneman & Ellis, 1995; O’Neil & Kitson, 1996).
• Providing young children with reading materials that would potentially satisfy theircuriosity and help them find answers to their own questions. Educational literature (e.g.,Hildebrand, 1997) regards questioning an important technique to be encouraged by teach-ers, because children are normally more enthusiastic about finding answers to their ownquestions. This is in line with the principles of learner-centered instruction, as it showsliterature as a resource for developing children’s thinking as creators, rather than passiverecipients, of knowledge. In this context, “Children are active learners, drawing on directsocial and physical experience as well as culturally transmitted knowledge to construct theirown understandings of the world around them” (Bredekamp & Copple, 1997, p. 13).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
184 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
• Encouraging young children to use literature inside and outside the classroom as a resourceto achieve learning outcomes and enable teachers to link curricular content with appropriateliterature to stimulate children’s interest in reading. Al-Barakat (2004) concluded that inte-grating literature into instruction is a key to good learning, which is consistent with claims(e.g., Morrow, 1992, 2001) pertaining to the significance of literacy-related experiences indeveloping children’s enthusiasm for and interest in reading.
The findings in this category provide evidence that preservice teachers perceive teachers asinstrumental in developing children’s interest in reading through a variety of classroom activities,which is consistent with reports that instructional practices not only support children’s interest inreading but also foster their learning to read (Neuman, Copple, & Bredekamp, 2000).
Designing Reading Materials
The analysis reveals that most of the respondents reportedly spend time designing reading mate-rials for the purpose of developing their pupils’ reading, as shown in Excerpts 5 through 7below.
First, I use the reading passages in the textbook, but when I do not find the proper materialsfor developing my pupils’ reading, I either pick other texts or design my own. (5)
I ask my pupils to read some of the materials I design myself. These engage them in readingat their leisure, because they take into account their specific needs and interests. (6)
Because a lot of the reading materials in the textbook are not appropriate for my pupils’reading level, experience taught me that the teacher should at least design some materialsto suit his/her pupils’ levels, especially ones which are supported by graphic illustrationsand pictures to suit different levels and heighten children’s interest in reading. (7)
These excerpts demonstrate the respondents’ perception of the teacher’s need to design materialsto suit his/her pupils’ levels and encourage them to read. To this end, the following key issuesare addressed:
• Designing his or her own reading materials, a teacher can cater to his or her pupils’ par-ticular needs and interests since he or she is the most likely person to identify these needs.Previous accounts, such as those of Dewey (1916), suggest that children actively constructknowledge through interacting with the world around them. Thus, connecting reading witheveryday life experiences has the potential to provide children with an ideal environmentfor active learning.
• Designing his or her own reading materials allows the teacher to accommodate his or herpupils’ reading levels. Well-designed supplementary materials are known to enhance class-room instruction (Bataineh & Al-Barakat, 2009; National Reading Panel, 2000; NationalResearch Council, 1998; Vaughn, Gersten, & Chard, 2000) and help struggling readerslearn to read (Elbaum, Vaughn, Hughes, Moody, & Schumm, 2000; Fletcher & Lyon,1998). More specific to Jordanian learners, Bataineh and Al-Barakat (2005) identified thedifficulty of comprehending reading materials as one of the obstacles to sparking an interestin reading.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 185
• Calls for the use of color, graphics, and illustrations in designing reading materials point outthe respondents’ awareness of the significance of these artifacts for developing children’sinterest in reading. Educational literature (e.g., Farris, Werderich, Nelson, & Fuhler, 2009;Kirschenbaum, 2006; Schatmeyer, 2007) suggests that colorful illustrations are a powerfulstimulus to learning. For example, Schatmeyer (2007) suggested that reading materials foryoung children should contain sufficient illustrations to help them comprehend readingtexts, for they not only support the story line but also “pad” the text that, albeit longer, canbe read quickly.
Establishing a Classroom Library
In spite of the fact that almost every Jordanian school has a library where pupils check out booksto meet their various reading needs, the vast majority of the respondents reported a need forestablishing a library in every classroom, as shown in Excerpts 8 through 11 below.
Establishing a library, a book corner at least, is important. It encourages young children tohave a constant contact with reading. (8)
Every teacher should start a simple library in his/her classroom to direct children to use itin the reading or other lessons. I believe that the books in the school library are insufficientfor all the pupils. My own pupils cannot sometimes borrow books from the school librarydue to the high demand by other pupils. (9)
At the beginning of every school year, school administrations should allocate a specificbudget to establish classroom libraries, especially in the early childhood education, inwhich children must be exposed to books at all times. (10)
I believe that the good teacher, who tries to develop his pupils’ interest in reading, makesevery effort to establish a classroom library. He/she can provide this library with children’sliterature, which can support the school curriculum. (11)
Excerpts 8 through 11 show that a classroom library is perceived to play a key part in promotingyoung children’s interest in reading, because the child’s exposure to literature in the classroommay readily develop his or her interest in reading. The respondents seem to justify the need forclassroom libraries using the following arguments:
• The availability of books in the classroom is bound to encourage children to read, which isin line with Morrow’s (2001) claims that children in classrooms with literature collectionsread 50% more books than children in classrooms with no such collections.
• An inadequate number of books in the school general library, which may be attributedto the growing numbers of pupils in Jordanian schools as a result of successive waves ofimmigrants from neighboring countries.
• Supporting the topics of the school curriculum, which is also consistent with Morrow’s(2001) call that children’s exposure to literature be frequently integrated with the curricu-lum to help teachers generate interest in and enthusiasm for reading.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
186 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
Making Use of the Local Library
About 60% of the respondents believed that urging children to use the local library encouragesthem to read in their spare time, as shown in Excerpts 12 through 15 below.
I encourage my pupils to visit the local library to get them to check out books or just readthem there. (12)
I often assign simple language exercises for my pupils to do in the local library, since theycan rely on reading materials that, I hope, would heighten their interest in reading. (13)
Since our school is of the few which do not have a library, I encourage my pupils to go tothe local library to read in groups on both school days and holidays. This encourages themto read in their free time, especially those who are reluctant readers. (14)
I urge friends to read in the local library so that they can encourage one another. (15)
The common denominator in these responses is the perception that teachers often steer childrento local libraries to read materials that can foster their interest in reading. These responses alsopoint to a perceived tendency by teachers to use peer pressure to encourage children to readthrough group library visits. It seems that this is effective for children who do not appear toperceive reading as important and who might discourage others from reading. Thus, promptingchildren to read in groups not only encourages them to build interest in reading, but also allowsthem opportunities to grow as readers.
Research (e.g., Dresang & Kotrla, 2003; Lance, 2002; Michie & Chaney, 2000; Sloan, 2009)suggests that school libraries have a positive effect on student achievement. More specifically,the idea that local libraries could help children develop an interest in reading is consistent withreports (e.g., Farris et al., 2009; Library and Archives Canada [LAC], 2006) showing that librariesgenerate children’s interest in reading by exposing them to a variety of enjoyable reading matter.Furthermore, library programs allocated for childhood education pupils are found to play a keyrole in addressing the problem of aliteracy, or being able to read but lacking the motivation to doso (LAC, 2006). Empirical evidence (Dresang & Kotrla, 2003; Lance, 2002; Michie & Chaney,2000) suggests that the role of the library should be appreciated, as it provides children withbooks to read at their leisure for a variety of uses, such as schoolwork, personal entertainment,and social experience.
Using Reinforcement
Even though the use of reinforcement is still a matter of controversy, following arguments ofinherent inappropriateness, counter-productiveness, and even harmfulness (e.g., Kohn, 1993;Packard, 1977), as well as counterarguments of its empirically proven value (e.g., Flora, 2004),reinforcement is a recurrent theme in the current data. However, even though they seem toendorse its value for learning, the respondents are somewhat reserved in their perceived useof reinforcement. About 73% of the sample reported that children should not be categoricallyreinforced, but rather only if they make a marked effort to develop their interest in reading, asillustrated in Excerpts 16 through 20.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 187
Whenever a pupil asks a question in the classroom, the teacher should ask the rest of theclass if anyone has read anything that could help answer that question. He/she shouldimmediately reinforce that with either praise or material rewards. (16)
A good procedure to develop children’s interest in reading is reinforcement. For instance,the teacher should reinforce a pupil when he/she reads any type of literature by allowinghim/her an opportunity to read it or report on it on the school morning broadcast. (17)
A teacher should use presents to reward any pupil who voluntarily reads on his/her own.(18)
I think children will be encouraged to read if we give them some rewards, such as booksor CD-ROMs, to read on their own. (19)
An effective way to encourage children to read independently is for teachers to organize orget their pupils to participate in school or local reading competitions. (20)
Excerpts 16 through 20 point out that children’s curiosity and desire to know should be usedto motivate them to engage in reading activities. Nevertheless, using reinforcement to motivatechildren to read should be based on the following:
• Awarding children tangible and/or moral reinforcement when they share ideas they haveread in response to questions or classroom activities. This is appropriate for creating andmaintaining an environment conducive to the development of children’s interest in reading,which is in line with Zirpoli’s (1995) claim that positive reinforcement is frequently usedto teach, maintain, or strengthen a variety of learning behaviors.
• Focusing on tangible reinforcement, such as storybooks or CD-ROMs, to generate interestin reading. Schatmeyer (2007) pointed out that providing children with books they can andwant to read is one of the most effective ways to assist readers in general and strugglingreaders in particular.
• Participating in literary competitions or activities in- and outside the school is an effec-tive way to stimulate children’s motivation to read. According to Bataineh and Al-Barakat(2005), failing to do so is one of the obstacles that impede developing children’s interest inreading.
In short, respondents repeatedly mentioned using reinforcement to stimulate children’s moti-vation to read during the interviews. One respondent said that “reinforcement is essential tostimulate children to read, for with proper reinforcement, even poor readers will be encouragedto read” (21). This points out the teacher’s role in promoting children’s interest in reading, as heor she helps them build good experiences, which may promote a life-long interest in reading.
These findings are in line with those of previous research (e.g., Gottfried, 1990; Guthrie,Wigfield, Metsala, & Cox, 1999; Hidi & Harackiewicz, 2000; Wigfield & Guthrie, 1997) thatconsiders reading motivation a substantial correlate of reading comprehension in later elemen-tary grades. Guthrie et al. (1999), for example, conclude that motivation is the “preeminentpredictor” of children’s frequent reading, regardless of their reading ability. Thus, stimulatingchildren’s motivation to read is of paramount importance, especially in light of evidence thatpoor motivation correlates with poor reading ability (Morgan & Fuchs, 2007).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
188 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
Establishing Good Relationships With Parents
Few respondents (about 16%) addressed the teacher’s role in establishing relations with parentsfor the purpose of developing children’s interest in reading. The analysis uncovers the teacher’spotentially instrumental role in getting parents involved in fostering their children’s emotionalgrowth as readers, as shown in Excerpts 22 through 27 below.
Teachers must talk to parents at teacher-parent meetings to encourage them to allow theirchildren an abundant supply of interesting storybooks and other reading materials. (22)
Parents should be made familiar with the criteria of selecting the books, which instill intheir children an aptitude for learning to read and learn about life. If the parents do notknow these, I believe, it should be entrusted to the teacher to do so. (23)
Teachers should let parents know that their children’s potential interest in reading dependson their interaction with their children during the course of the reading process. (24)
Teachers have the responsibility to educate parents on the importance of reading to theirchildren at home and particularly at bedtime. (25)
I believe that the school should make it one of its priorities to contact parents to encouragethem to involve their children in literacy-related activities. (26)
Providing parents with, or helping them locate, screening tests to measure the extentof their children’s willingness to read is useful, for it helps parents find out importantinformation about their children’s growth as readers. (27)
These excerpts highlight the parents’ role in developing children’s reading interest, one whichmay be dependent on the extent to which teachers establish a working relationship with theseparents. Therefore, preservice teachers who are not aware of their own role in establishing rela-tionships with parents, nor with ways to involve these parents in developing their children’sinterest in reading, may put themselves and their pupils at a disadvantage, as they may missout on a vital resource (Feiler et al., 2008; Power, 1992). These findings are also consistentwith research demonstrating that children who are read to by parents or other adults duringtheir preschool years subsequently gain positive attitudes toward reading, increased confidenceand motivation to read, and enhanced reading and writing skills (Bettelheim & Zelan, 1982;Grimmett & McCoy, 1980; Ihmeideh, 2009; Spiegel, 1981).
Teachers could use one or more of the following strategies to establish relationships withparents to get them involved in their children’s development as readers:
• Organizing meetings with parents to raise their awareness of their potential role in devel-oping their children’s interest in reading. Parents should be encouraged to buy books fortheir children according to selection criteria that contribute to creating and maintaining aninterest in and positive attitudes toward reading. Teachers also could provide parents withup-to-date book lists, often made available online by national and international readingassociations, which may encourage children’s life-long interest in reading. To this effect,Hildebrand (1997) pointed out that teachers can help parents get appropriate books intotheir homes by ordering them through the school.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 189
• Showing parents how to interact with their children through reading literature, which mayraise children’s awareness of the value of reading, especially if they take part in the selectionand execution of the reading task (Al-Barakat, 2010; Morrow, 2001).
• Getting children involved in reading books at home helps them develop positive attitudestoward reading. The respondents pointed out that parents need to read frequently to theirchildren, a practice also suggested by Hildebrand (1997) that not only develops children’sinterest in reading, but also helps them learn vocal inflection and practice reading in highlymotivating interactions.
• Providing parents with screening tests to measure their children’s competencies in and atti-tudes toward reading is an effective means to gauge children’s emerging interest in reading.The respondents stressed the importance of finding out whether a child enjoys reading and,then, for the teacher to advise parents of instructional practices to motivate him/her todevelop an interest in reading. Among these practices, parents may encourage their chil-dren to join reading circles, attend story times, check out library books, and experience awide range of reading-related activities besides reading (Beers, 1996; Ihmeideh, 2009).
Using Information and Communication Technology
A few respondents (about 18%) expressed a need for using information and community tech-nology (ICT) as a resource for developing children’s reading skills. They pointed out that ICTshould be integrated into all aspects of the teaching/learning process, and that developing chil-dren’s interest in reading is inevitable when ICT is used, as shown in Excerpts 28 through 30below.
If stories are useful in developing children’s interest in reading when told by the teacher, Ithink that their value doubles when presented by technology. (28)
The Ministry of Education should provide teachers with incentives to write e-books anddesign software and websites for teaching reading to young children. Also, children shouldbe encouraged to read e-books to heighten their interest in and create positive attitudestowards reading. (29)
I think that there should be at least one computer in every classroom to be used as a resourceto encourage children and allow them opportunities to read. (30)
The excerpts above point to a perceived role of ICT in developing children’s interest in reading.Computer software has been hailed as a good medium for engaging children in literacy-relatedactivities, thus not only developing their interest in reading, but also building lifelong readinghabits (Balajthy, Reuber, & Damon, 1999).
Because ICT offers different advantages, such as sound, music, animations, and clarity ofprint, it has the potential to heighten children’s interest in reading (Alali, 2007; Perkinson, 1996;Wepner & Ray, 2000). This is also consistent with reports by the Education Development Center(EDC, 2004) that young children’s motivation to read increases when using hypermedia-basedsoftware, and with research from Jong and Bus (2004) showing that electronic books engagechildren in autonomous reading through meeting their developmental needs without requiringmuch adult support.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
190 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
The current findings on preservice teachers’ perceptions of instructional practices to developyoung children’s interest in reading constitute a good starting point for identifying perceivedinstructional practices and supportive scaffolding for further research. The study concludesthat as the teacher attempts to develop the child’s personality, he or she also should help thischild learn to enjoy reading individually and with others. To achieve this, the authors suggestthat (pre- and inservice) childhood education teachers take the following into account whenthinking of practices to encourage young children to read and develop a lifelong interest inreading:
• Allow children opportunities to understand and manipulate language, especially in light ofreports that early literacy activities contribute to children’s later development and lifelonginterest in reading
• Provide children with opportunities for accurate and fluent reading to allow them to practiceletter-sounds relationships
• Use interesting stories to develop language comprehension—whether it be by reading tochildren or having them read themselves, individually and in groups—to emphasize thepersonal and social aspects of learning to read
• Support parents’ knowledge and raising their awareness of their role in their children’s lan-guage and literacy development through increasing their involvement in literacy activitiesat home
• Make use of research-based criteria for selecting appropriate reading materials to ensuredeveloping young children’s interest in reading
• Show enthusiasm and encouraging children’s natural curiosity to foster their interest inreading
• Allow for individual differences among children to avoid causing frustration and negativeattitudes toward reading in less able ones.
Based on the findings of the study, the authors recommend that a follow-up study be con-ducted to gauge teachers’ actual use of these practices in the classroom, which would help get amore insightful picture into teachers’ actual classroom practices for developing young children’sinterest in reading.
NOTE
1. To obtain a copy of the instrument, contact the corresponding author at [email protected].
REFERENCES
Alali, E. (2007). The effect of reading through computer screen on reading comprehension of seventh grade students andtheir attitudes towards it (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Al-Barakat, A. (2004). tasawurat mu�allimı-s-sufuf al¿asasiyeh-θ -θalaθa-l¿ula lit-taktıt il-tadrısi-l-mula¿em litanmiyati-l-wa�yi-l-bı¿ı lada-t-talamıδ (The perceptions of the first three primary grades teachers of proper instructionalplanning for improving pupils’ environmental awareness). Journal of Um Elqura University (Humanities, Social,and Education Sciences Series), 16(2), 51–92.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 191
Al-Barakat, A. (2010). Effectiveness of a training programme based on storytelling strategy in developing reading com-prehension of third grade pupils and their attitudes toward it. Journal of Um-Alqura University of Educational andPsychological Sciences, 2(1), 392–451.
Allington, R., & Guice, S. (1998). Learning to read: What research says parents can do to help their children. Retrievedfrom www.pta.org
Balajthy, E., Reuber, K., & Damon, C. (1999). Using computers for intervention and remediation of severely reading-impaired children in a university literacy clinic. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 434 329)
Bataineh, R., & Al-Barakat, A. (2005). ihtimãmãt ul-qirã?a wa-mu3awiqatuha lada tala:mi:δ as-sufu:f al-asãsiya aθ -θalãθa al-?u:la fi: mudi:riyãt at-tarbiya wat-ta3li:m fi: mantiqat samãl il-urdun (The reading interests of Jordanianfirst-, second-, and third-grade pupils’ and the obstacles limiting these interests). Journal of Educational andPsychology Sciences, 6(3), 107–133.
Bataineh, R., & Al-Barakat, A. (2009). Jordanian early primary stage teachers’ self-reported practices to develop theirpupils’ literacy. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 65–92.
Beach, S. (1996). “I can read my own story!” Becoming literate in the primary grades. Young Children, 52(1), 30–33.Beers, K. (1996). No time, no interest, no way! The 3 voices of aliteracy. School Library Journal, 42(3), 110–113.Bettleheim, B., & Zelan, K. (1982). On learning to read: The child’s fascination with meaning. New York, NY: Knopf.Bishop, R., Berryman, M., & Richardson, C. (2001). Te Toi Huarewa: Effective teaching and learning strategies, and
effective teaching materials for improving the reading and writing in te reo Mäori of students aged five to ninein Mäori-medium education. Final report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry ofEducation.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston,MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Breakwell, G., Hammond, S., & Fife-Schaw, C. (1995). Research methods in psychology. London, UK: Sage.Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Washington,
DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Burgess, K., Lundgren, K., Lloyd, J., & Pianta, R. (2001). Preschool teachers’ self-reported beliefs and practices about
literacy instruction (Report No. 20012). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Improvement of EarlyReading Achievement.
Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers’ early conceptions of classroom practice.Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1–8.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.Collins, F. (2005). “She’s sort of dragging me into the story!” Student teachers’ experience of reading aloud in Key Stage
2 classes. Literacy, 5(1), 10–17.Daneman, M., & Ellis, M. (1995). Memory for expository text: The effect of verbal and pictorial enhancements.
Educational Psychology, 15(2), 115–126.Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.Dresang, E., & Kotrla, B. (2003, July 7-11). Breaking barriers with student-centered teaching and learning using library
books in the United States’ poorest schools. In S. Zinn, G. Hart, & E. Howe (Eds.), School Libraries BreakingDown Barriers: Selected Papers From the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association of SchoolLibrarianship and Seventh International Forum on Research in School Librarianship (pp. 43–53). Durban, SouthAfrica: International Association of School Librarianship.
Education Development Center. (2004). Technology and teaching children to read. Retrieved from www.neirtec.org/reading_report/
Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., Moody, S., & Schumm, J. (2000). How reading outcomes of students with disabil-ities are related to instructional grouping formats: A meta-analytical review. In R. Gersten, E. Schiller, & S. Vaughn(Eds.), Contemporary special education research (pp. 107–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fadolallah, M. (1995). alk. ira¿a-l-hurra lil¿atfal wa-wasa¿il tanmiyatiha fi-l-manzil wal-madrasa wal-maktaba(Children’s voluntary reading and means for developing it in the home, school and library). Cairo, Egypt: AlamAlkotob.
Farris, P., Werderich, D., Nelson, P., & Fuhler, C. (2009). Male call: Fifth-grade boys’ reading preferences. The ReadingTeacher, 63(3), 180–188.
Feiler, A., Andrews, J., Greenhough, P., Hughes, M., Johnson, D., Scanlan, M., & Yee, W. (2008). Exchange project:Linking home and school to improve children’s literacy. Support for Learning, 23(1), 12–18.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy(pp. 150–170). New York, NY: Longman.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
192 AL-BARAKAT AND BATAINEH
Fletcher, J., & Lyon, G. (1998). Reading: A research-based approach. In W. M. Evans (Ed.), What’s gone wrong inAmerica’s classrooms (pp. 49–90). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
Flora, S. (2004). The power of reinforcement. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Freedman-De Vito, B. (2004). Why reading is so important for children. Retrieved from www.familyresource.com/
parenting/childdevelopment/why-reading-is-so-important-for-childrenGottfried, A. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 82(3), 525–538.Grann, R., & Lloyd, H. (1997). The reading interests of children. Journal of Education Sociology, 21(4), 215–219.Grimmett, S., & McCoy, M. (1980). Effects of parental communication on reading performance of third grade children.
The Reading Teacher, 33, 303–308.Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J., & Cox, K. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and
reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256.Haberman, M. (1985). Can common sense effectively guide the behavior of beginning teachers? Journal of Teacher
Education, 36(6), 32–35.Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century.
Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.Hildebrand, V. (1997). Introduction to early childhood education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Ihmeideh, F. (2009). The effect of a print-rich classroom environment on developing kindergarten children’s awareness
of written language. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 59–69.Jong, M., & Bus, A. (2004). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children’s emergent story
understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 378–393.Kirschenbaum, V. (2006). The old way of reading and the new. Educational Leadership, 63(8), 47–50.Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. Boston,
MA: Houghton Mifflin.Lance, K. (2002). What research can tell us about the importance of school libraries. White House Conference on School
Libraries. Retrieved from www.imls.gov/pubs/whitehouse0602/keithlance.htmLehman, B. (1996). Teachers’ perceptions on response comparison when children and adult read children’s literature.
Reading Research and Instruction, 35(2), 142–152.Library and Archives Canada. (2006). Literature review on the impact of summer reading clubs. Retrieved from
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/009003/f2/009003-06-040-e.pdfList, D. (2005). Know your audience: A practical guide to media research. Wellington, New Zealand: Original Books.
Retrieved from www.cemca.org/booksLouden, W., & Rohl, M. (2006). Too many theories and not enough instruction: Perceptions of preservice teacher
preparation for literacy teaching in Australian schools. Literacy, 40, 66–78.McKenna, M., & Kear, D. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher,
43(8), 626–639.McKenna, M., Kear, D., & Ellsworth, R. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading
Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.Merriam, S. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.Michie, J., & Chaney, B. (2000). Assessment of the role of school and public libraries in support of educational reform.
General audience report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Moats, L. (1999). Reading is rocket science: What expert teachers should know and be able to do. Washington, DC:
American Federation of Teachers. Retrieved from www.aft.org/pubs-reports/downloads/teachers/rocketsci.pdfMorgan, P., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading
motivation? Exceptional Children, 73(2), 165–183.Morrow, L. (1992). The impact of a literature-based program on literacy achievement, use of literature, and attitudes of
children from minority backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 250–275.Morrow, L. (2001). Relationships between literature programs, library corner design, and children’s use of literature.
Journal of Educational Research, 75, 339–344.National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on
reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and HumanDevelopment.
National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: NationalAcademy Press.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
PERCEIVED PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING READING INTERESTS 193
Neuman, S., Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2000). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practicesfor young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Ogle, L., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., Roey, S., & Williams, T. (2003). International comparisons infourth-grade reading literacy: Findings from the progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) of 2001.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
O’Neil, J., & Kitson, N. (1996). Effective curriculum management. London, UK: Routledge.Packard, V. (1977). The people shapers. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational
Research, 62(3), 307–333.Perkinson, K. (1996). Helping your children use the library. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 400833)Power, J. (1992). Parent/teacher partnerships in early literacy learning: The benefits for teachers. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 371839)Richek, M., List, L., & Lerner, J. (1989). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies (2nd ed.). Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Roberts, M., & Wilson, J. (2006). Reading activities and instructional methodology: How might achievement become
affected? Reading Improvement, 43(2), 64–69.Robson, C. (1997). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner–research. Oxford, UK:
Blackwell.Sainsbury, M. (2004). Children’s attitudes to reading. Education Review, 17(2), 49–54.Schatmeyer, K. (2007). Hooking struggling readers: Using books they can and want to read. Illinois Reading Council
Journal, 35(1), 7–13.Sloan, M. (2009). Developing a good practice guide on library services for older people. APLIS, 22(2), 48–57.Sperling, R., & Head, D. (2002). Reading attitudes and literacy skills in prekindergarten and kindergarten children. Early
Childhood Education Journal, 29, 233–236.Spiegel, D. (1981). Reading for pleasure: Guidelines. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Preservice teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices.
Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 113–121.Swanson, B. S. (1998). Encouraging your child to read. Retrieved from www.readingrockets.org/article/192Tronbacke, B., & Ingemar, S. (1996). Easy to read: An important part of reading promotion in the fight against illiteracy.
IFLA Journal, 23(3), 185–191.Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (2000). The underlying messages in LD intervention research: Findings from
research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99–114.Wang, Y. (2000). Children’s attitudes toward reading and their literacy development. Journal of Instructional Psychology.
Retrieved from www.fmdarticles.com/p/articles/mi_mOFCG/is_2_27/ai_63365166/printWepner, S., & Ray, L. (2000). Sign of the times: Technology and early literacy learning. In D. Strickland & L. Morrow
(Eds.), Beginning reading and writing (pp. 168–182). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (1997). Motivation for reading: Individual, home, textual, and classroom perspective.
Educational Psychologist, 32, 57–135.Wilke, R. (2004). How content area influences choice of instructional methods: An examination of one component of
pre-service teacher belief (Unpublished master’s thesis). Florida State University, Tallahassee.Wimmer, R., & Dominick, J. (1997). Mass media research: An introduction. Belmont, MA: Wadsworth.Wubbels, T. (1992). Taking account of student teachers’ preconceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 137–150.Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. (2006). Unstructured interviews. Retrieved from http://ils.unc.edu/~yanz/Unstructured_
interviews.pdfZirpoli, T. (1995). Understanding and affecting the behavior of young children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Was
hbur
n U
nive
rsity
] at
17:
50 1
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
