Preliminary Engineering Report 2016 Street & Utility ... Feasibility Report_091515sm.pdfThe bituminous streets within the project areas are aged and exhibit various levels of wear

Preliminary Engineering Report

2016 Street & Utility Improvements

City of Hopkins

City Project No. 2015-10

BMI Project No. T16.110077

September 2015

Submitted by:

Bolton & Menk, Inc.

12224 Nicollet Avenue

Burnsville, MN 55337

P: 952-890-0509

F: 952-890-8065

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Certification 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077

Certification

Feasibility Report

for

2016 Street & Utility Improvements

City of Hopkins Hopkins, MN

City Project No. 2015-10 BMI Project No. T16.110077

I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: Mike Waltman, P.E. License No. 48696 Date: September 11, 2015

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Table of Contents 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077

Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 2 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 2

3.1 Streets .......................................................................................................................... 2

3.2 Storm Sewer ................................................................................................................. 6

3.3 Sanitary Sewer .............................................................................................................. 6

3.4 Water Main .................................................................................................................. 7

4.0 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Streets .......................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Storm Sewer ................................................................................................................. 8

4.3 Sanitary Sewer .............................................................................................................. 9

4.4 Water Main .................................................................................................................. 9

4.5 Pedestrian Facilities ...................................................................................................... 9

4.6 Driveways ..................................................................................................................... 9

4.7 Lawn Sprinkler Systems .............................................................................................. 10

4.8 Street Signing and Striping ......................................................................................... 10

4.9 Turf Restoration ......................................................................................................... 10

4.10 Boulevard Trees .......................................................................................................... 10

5.0 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING .................................................................................................. 10 6.0 ESTIMATED COSTS ................................................................................................................ 11 7.0 ASSESSMENT RATES ............................................................................................................. 12 8.0 RIGHT-OF-WAY / EASEMENTS / PERMITS ............................................................................ 13 9.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE.............................................................................................................. 15 10.0 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION ................................................................................. 15

Appendix Appendix A: Preliminary Cost Estimates Appendix B: Figures Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix D: Resident Questionnaire Appendix E: Neighborhood Meetings Appendix F: Geotechnical Evaluation

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. PROJECT INTRODUCTION 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 1

1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION

This report examines the proposed street and utility improvements including storm sewer, water main, sanitary sewer, and street reconstruction in the neighborhood surrounding Hilltop Park, including the following streets:

18th Avenue North from Mainstreet to the HCRRA right-of-way

Alley in HCRRA ROW from 18th Avenue North to ½ block east

19th Avenue North from Mainstreet to 1st Street North

20th Avenue North from Mainstreet to 3rd Street North

21st Avenue North from approx. 150 feet south of 2nd Street North to 4th Street North

2nd Street North from 20th Avenue North to 17th Avenue North

3rd Street North from18th Avenue North to 17th Avenue North

4th Street North from 21st Avenue North to 19th Avenue North

The project location is shown in Figure 1.1 of Appendix B. Generally, the project involves:

Addition/replacement of storm sewer

Water main replacement

Water service replacement

Sanitary sewer replacement

Sanitary sewer service replacement

Concrete curb & gutter replacement

Bituminous street removal and reconstruction

Turf Restoration

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. BACKGROUND 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 2

2.0 BACKGROUND

The Hopkins City Council ordered the preparation of this feasibility report at its May 19, 2015 council meeting. The feasibility study and report has been completed to identify the infrastructure improvements needed in the proposed project area and to define costs associated with the improvements. This report will be used as the basis for final design and is also a required step in the State’s Chapter 429 process for special assessments.

Questionnaires were sent to residents within the project area to allow them an opportunity to provide input on various project related concerns including water and sewer services, and drainage issues. Comments provided by the residents give us a better understanding of areas of concern within the project area. A copy of the questionnaire and a summary of resident comments is provided in Appendix D of this report. A neighborhood meeting was also held on August 27, 2015 for the purposes of informing affected property owners about the improvements being considered and receiving their comments about problems and concerns to address by the project.

The project area consists of mostly of single family high density zoning (residential neighborhood), with some park and commercial zoning and usage.

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

Streets

The bituminous streets within the project areas are aged and exhibit various levels of wear and distress. This is evident on the surface by transverse, block, and alligator cracking. The majority of City streets have concrete curb and gutter, with small areas of bituminous curb. In many areas, the curb height is only a few inches, indicating the presence of patching or overlaying of the existing pavement and gutter. There is evidence of previous additional street repairs and maintenance throughout the project area including numerous street patches.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 3

Existing Conditions

The City’s Pavement Management System indicates that the “Pavement Condition Index” (PCI) for many of the street segments in the neighborhood is below the threshold where reconstruction is appropriate.


Subgrade soil sampling was completed throughout the entire project area by Braun Intertec in the summer of 2015. A copy of Braun Intertec’s Geotechnical Exploration Report is included in Appendix F of this report. Twenty-four soil borings were taken throughout the project area.

The existing soils just beneath pavements in the project area consist of a mixture of silty sand, sand with silt, and clayey sand fill. The resistance of the soils to deformation under repeated loadings is indicated by the Hveem Stabilometer R value estimated by the geotechnical engineer for the various boring locations. The recommended average value that results in an acceptable pavement section for each street segment for this project is 20. This value is on the lower end of the scale and indicates the soils would be susceptible to deformation over time in a residential neighborhood if the pavement section was inadequate for the amount and type of traffic, or the use of the pavement extended beyond its intended life cycle.

Loads from traffic on the natural soils under a pavement are reduced by using layers of stronger materials at the surface to spread wheel weight to a larger “footprint” on the underlying soils. Engineers typically use a lower cost, moderate strength material consisting of a blend of rock, sand, and fine “filler” particles for the lowest level in the pavement. This layer is referred to as aggregate base and is an important element of the pavement in residential areas. The aggregate base is capped with layers of higher cost asphaltic concrete, often referred to as “bituminous surfacing” for additional strength, a smoother ride, and dust and mud control. The thicknesses used will vary within practical limits, but are typically held to a minimum in residential areas. Designers try to seek a section that balances cost with strength and durability needs and constructability constraints. This usually means a heavy reliance on the aggregate base layer in low traffic areas like residential neighborhoods.

No aggregate base layer was found below the existing pavement in nearly all of the borings. The thickness of the bituminous surfacing was in most cases inadequate to offset the lack of base material. The apparent under-design, combined with the age of the roads, offers some explanation for the poor pavement conditions observed in the area.

The streets within the neighborhood vary in width from 20 to 35 feet from face to face of curbs, with most streets being 32 feet wide. 21st Avenue North is only 20 feet wide as 4th Street North is approached. Parking is allowed on both sides of the streets. The existing grades range from approximately 0% (very flat) to 14.1% (very steep). No sidewalks exist throughout the project along various blocks and sides of the residential streets. A variety of trees are located in the boulevards throughout the project area. Some of these are large and very close to the curbs. Table 3.1 identifies the existing street width, existing curb type, existing street grade, existing right-of-way (ROW) width, and sidewalk/trail location on each street within the project area.


Table 3.1 – Existing Street Dimensions

Street Existing Street

Width Existing Curb Type

Existing Longitudinal

Grade

Existing ROW Width

Existing Sidewalk Side

18th Avenue North 32 feet Concrete B618 0.0% - 3.9% 60 feet None



21st Avenue North 20-29 feet Concrete B618 / Bit

Curb 0.3% - 14.1%

33-66 feet None

2nd Street North 35-36 feet Concrete B618 0.07% -

6.6% 66 feet None

3rd Street North 30 feet Concrete B618 0.5% - 1.08%

60 feet None

4th Street North 32 feet Concrete No Gutter /

Bit Curb 0.8% - 5.4% 60 feet

North (Concrete/Bit)

The soil borings revealed existing pavement thicknesses ranging from 3 to 12 inches, with most streets at an average thickness of approximately 5 inches. The subgrade materials varied throughout the neighborhood but were most commonly found to be silty sand and clayey sand fill over poorly graded sand. A summary of the existing soils conditions and bituminous thicknesses are listed in Table 3.2. Soil boring logs are included in the geotechnical report in Appendix F.

Table 3.2 – Soil Boring Logs and Geotechnical Report

Street Bituminous Thickness Subgrade Material

18th Avenue North 4” – 6” Mixture of silty sand and clayey sand with some gravel. Aggregate base of 12 inches found in 2 of 7

borings.

19th Avenue North 5” Mixture of sandy clay and clayey sand with some gravel. Aggregate base of 12 inches found in 1 of 2

borings.

20th Avenue North 3” – 4.5” Mixture of silty sand and clayey sand with gravel.

21st Avenue North 4” Mixture of silty sand and clayey sand with some gravel.

2nd Street North 4” – 5” Mixture of silty sand and sandy clay with some gravel. Aggregate base of 12 inches found in 1 of 3

borings.

3rd Street North 3” Mixture of silty sand and clayey sand with some gravel.

4th Street North 7.5” – 12” Mixture of silty sand and lean clay with some gravel.


Alleys

Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) alleys exist adjacent to backyards throughout the project area. The alleys are in relatively good condition and replacement of the alleys is not included as part of this project.

Boulevard Trees

Large, mature boulevard trees exist throughout the project area.

Some of the boulevard tree species within the project area may considered undesirable. The species of concern are Green Ash and Silver Maple. Green Ash is susceptible to disease from the Emerald Ash Borer. This insect has been found to be spreading in the metropolitan area. Silver Maple trees are more susceptible to storm damage than other species, and create a lot of litter because of their soft wood and weak, brittle branches. They are known to have an intrusive root system that can damage sidewalks and curbs and penetrate sewer joints.

The intent of this project relative to trees is to preserve them to the extent reasonably feasible. Amendments to the existing boulevard tree species mix is beyond the scope of this project; however, individual trees that conflict with new work or are identified as problematic will be considered for removal. It is recommended an inventory be completed during final design of boulevard trees in terms of both tree health and species.

Storm Sewer

Some drainage issues have been identified throughout the project area. The drainage concerns were identified by examination of project topography, discussion with staff, and by residents via the resident questionnaire and/or the neighborhood meeting. Due to the flat grades of some of the streets and large tributary area with no catch basins, standing water after rain events and large flows on the street surface are common. Street settlements and street patching have contributed to the problems as well. Primary locations where drainage issues were identified include:

Intersection of 18th Avenue N / 3rd St N

Intersection of Hwy 7 / 4th St N / 21st Ave N

Along 19th Avenue, from Mainstreet to 1st St N

Along 20th Avenue, from Mainstreet to 1st St N

Recommendations to help alleviate these drainage problems are included in section 4.2 of this report.

Sanitary Sewer

The existing condition of the sanitary sewer system was determined through discussions with City staff and televising reports. The existing sanitary sewer system is illustrated in the figures in Appendix B.

The existing sanitary sewer system consists primarily of 8-inch Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP) with block manholes constructed in the 1950’s. VCP is susceptible to infiltration and root intrusion over time due to the large number of joints and the deterioration of the gasket material originally used to seal the joints. Block manholes are also susceptible to infiltration over time due to cracks and deterioration of the mortared joints. Service lines in the neighborhood are typically 4-inch or 6-inch and their material may be clay, Orangeburg, or Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC). PVC is a durable plastic and is the current City standard. The northerly 300 feet of 21st Avenue has an existing PVC main. Televising records noted some shallow sags in this line and three locations where the existing pipe was moderately cracked.

Proposed sanitary sewer improvements are discussed later in this report.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 7

Water Main

The existing layout and condition of the water main was determined from record drawings and discussions with City staff. The water main is primarily 6-inch cast iron pipe (CIP) constructed circa 1950. CIP of this vintage is susceptible to internal rusting and breakage. An 18-inch Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) water main exists along 21st Avenue North and along 4th Street North. This pipe was installed in 1969 and 1970. Ductile iron pipe is less brittle than CIP and so is less prone to breakage. DIP is the current City standard watermain material. Service lines in the neighborhood are typically ¾-inch or 1-inch and their material may be copper, galvanized steel, or lead.

The layout of the existing water main is illustrated in the figures 3.1 – 3.16 in Appendix B.

4.0 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

Streets

All streets within the 2016 project limits are scheduled for full reconstruction. This is based on the City of Hopkins’ Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), underlying utility needs, observed pavement conditions, and pavement and soil sampling. The streets have reached a point where maintenance procedures such as seal coating or milling and overlaying are no longer cost effective strategies to improve pavement condition and delay deterioration.

The proposed improvements include replacing the concrete curb and gutter and complete pavement section. Reclamation of the existing pavement (and base where it exists) is proposed to reduce excavation and imported base costs. Pavement reclamation is done with a machine that grinds up the existing bituminous surface and underlying base material (if any) and mixes it in place to create a recycled base material. This material will be used as a temporary driving surface for access within the project during utility replacement. The recycled material will also be salvaged as much as possible and reused as part of the new aggregate base section.

The horizontal and vertical alignments will approximate the existing alignments with attempts at lowering the road to facilitate drainage from the front yards to the street where beneficial and practical. Existing street widths will generally be preserved, with some notable exceptions. 2nd Street North will be narrowed from 35 feet to 32 feet. 3rd Street North will be widened from 30 feet to 32 feet. These modifications, in part based public input, will make all roadways within the area a consistent 32-foot width.

It is proposed that the width of 21st Avenue North be increased to some degree to better facilitate two-way traffic with parking and improve clearance for emergency vehicles, especially during winter snow plowing season. Some street width is often sacrificed for extended periods in winter to windrows of snow. Three proposed alternatives are presented in this report and have varying impacts. Tree and boulevard impacts have been estimated for each option. Typically, final tree removals are determined during construction and coordinated with property owners in advance. The evaluation of these alternatives is as follows:

a. 28-foot-width (F-F): Figure 3.10

Consistent with the existing width of 21st Avenue south of the extension of 3rd Street N and consistent with the typical minimum width where parking is allowed, a 28-foot-wide roadway width from curb face to curb face (F-F) was first considered and presented to the public at the neighborhood meeting. While the exact amount of widening proposed by this option varies from location to location, in general this alternative proposed an 8-foot widening on the westerly side of the roadway. The proposed curb line on the easterly side of the road is proposed to approximate the existing pavement edge with slight


increases at some locations.

Property owners fronting 21st Avenue N between the extension of 3rd Street N and 4th Street N expressed opposition to the widening of 21st Avenue N by primarily citing concerns over impacts to front yards and anticipated increases in traffic speed. An estimated 15 trees and shrubs within the public right of way are estimated to be removed under this proposal. Impacts to multiple garden spaces are also anticipated, however this is consistent with all options considered due to their close proximity to the existing roadway.

b. 24-foot-width (F-F): Figure 3.11

A proposed 24-foot roadway was also considered and evaluated with regard to yard impacts. The proposed curb line along the easterly side was held consistent with the 28-foot-width alternative. The westerly curb line was shifted four feet from that alternative.

Impacts to trees and shrubs, an estimated total of 12 within the right-of-way, are anticipated with this alternative. Gardens located within the public right-of-way are anticipated consistent with the 28-foot-width alternative. In recent years, the City has constructed one 24-foot-wide roadway as it was constricted by a 30-foot-wide public right of way. 2nd Street N between Ridgewood Lane and Washington Avenue N was built to this width in 2009 due to this constraint.

c. 22-foot-width (F-F): Figure 3.12

Finally, a proposed 22-foot roadway was evaluated with regard to yard impacts. The proposed curb line along the easterly side was held consistent with the 28-foot-width alternative. The westerly curb line was shifted six feet from that alternative.

Impacts to trees and shrubs, an estimated total of 10 within the right-of-way, are anticipated with this alternative. Impacts to gardens located within the public right-of-way are anticipated consistent with the other alternatives.

While significant impacts are anticipated in the public right of way in front of some properties, it is recommended the desired street width be considered by the City with regard to parking allowances and emergency vehicle access. It is recommended parking restrictions be considered to the degree necessary to maintain reliable access for emergency vehicles during winter conditions. For the 22-foot and 24-foot alternatives, it is recommended parking be restricted on at least one side of the roadway.

The recommended minimum street grade is 0.5%. Street grades flatter than 0.50% are undesirable as the ability to adequately drain the road decreases as grades get flatter. Poor drainage can create safety issues in freezing weather and accelerate the degradation of the pavement. Overall drainage patterns throughout the project area are not anticipated to change. To meet this minimum grade requirement, creation of one or multiple new low-points is recommended on both 19th Ave N and 20th Ave N between Mainstreet and 1st St N to help facilitate drainage and maintain the minimum street grades. Additional locations may also be determined during final design.

The recommended typical section for all the streets consists of four inches of bituminous pavement over eight inches of aggregate base. The recommended amounts of subgrade correction, with select granular borrow, will be determined by a roll test during construction. Subgrade correction usually ranges from 12 to 24 inches, and is used only when needed as discovered by test rolling during construction.

The proposed typical sections are shown in Appendix B.

Storm Sewer

The existing storm sewer systems are aged and insufficient to meet the City standard design


standards. The existing systems will also be in conflict with the replacement of the sanitary sewer and water main in many locations. Full replacement of the existing storm sewer systems is recommended as a part of this project. Additional storm sewers are proposed in areas to help improve drainage reduce depths of water flowing in the streets during larger storms.

The proposed improvements are identified on the figures in Appendix B.

Sanitary Sewer

The information used to evaluate the existing condition of the sanitary sewer includes televised recordings of the sewers, record drawings, manhole reports, and discussions with City staff. Due to the age of the sanitary sewer system and the City policy to replace VCP sewers during street projects, existing VCP sanitary sewers are recommended to be completely replaced with PVC pipe. New service wyes will be provided to each home. Per City policy, sanitary services which are not PVC are proposed to be replaced with PVC pipe to the right-of-way (ROW) line. New precast concrete manholes will be installed and incorporate the City standard 27-inch diameter cover with concealed pick-holes. No changes in flow patterns to trunk sewers or interceptors are proposed.

Water Main

It is proposed to replace the cast-iron water system with ductile iron pipe (DIP) as a part of this project. Existing 6-inch water mains are proposed to be replaced with 8-inch water mains. The City uses 8-inch pipe as a minimum because the cost premium over 6-inch is low, but the capacity for supplying water, especially fire flows, is much greater.

Per City policy all water service lines are proposed to be replaced to the ROW line with 1-inch copper unless the existing service material is copper and less than 10 years old. A new curb stop and box will be provided on each service.

The figures 3.1 – 3.16 in Appendix B illustrate the proposed water main improvements.

Pedestrian Facilities

No new sidewalks are proposed in the residential portions of the project area due to right of way and fiscal constraints and resident familiarity with lack of sidewalk. Several questionnaire respondents stated firm opposition to the addition of walks in the project area. Some walk is being added at 4th Street North to facilitate pedestrian access to the park. Sidewalks are also proposed to be installed from Mainstreet to the east-west alley behind Mainstreet properties on 18th, 19th, and 20th Avenues.

Driveways

All existing driveways within the project areas receiving new concrete curb and gutter will receive a new concrete apron to match the proposed concrete curb. The new concrete aprons will be constructed according to City standards. In addition to the 5-foot driveway apron, additional driveway pavement needing to be disturbed as a part of the project will be replaced in-kind to match the existing driveway with the street improvements.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 10

Lawn Sprinkler Systems

There are some existing sprinkler systems in the residential area of the project. Property owners will need to assist in locating and identifying the type of sprinkler systems that are in place prior to and during construction. The contractor will be required to make reasonable efforts to preserve the in place systems during construction if they are located by the owners. Unmarked sprinkler lines, heads, or other components damaged by the contractor will not be repaired by the City or its contractor. Marked sprinkler lines in conflict with the proposed construction which cannot be avoided will be removed and replaced in-kind by the City or its contractor.

Street Signing and Striping

The existing street name signs will be salvaged and reinstalled by the contractor as necessary to facilitate construction. Regulatory signs such as STOP signs will be replaced in order to conform to new retroreflectivity requirements. Existing pavement markings will be repainted upon completion of the paving.

Turf Restoration

Areas disturbed by construction will be graded to match the new street grades and restored with lawn type sod. Boulevards will be graded as necessary to facilitate drainage from the existing yards to the streets.

Boulevard Trees

The existing trees in the neighborhood will be protected from the construction. The degree of protection efforts made for any given tree will be based on its species, condition, location, and adjacent homeowner opinions.

Certain trees may be identified during design or construction to be removed. This may be due to the street reconstruction, grading, utility replacement, sidewalk replacement, water service replacement, sewer service replacement, or other factors. Options to preserve highly desirable trees in harm’s way include small retaining walls or moving service lines around trees. The City will work with the homeowners to replace these trees as part of the project in the event tree removal is necessary.

The following species have been found to work well in the boulevard areas:

Sugar Maple Red Oak Parkway Norway Maple Greenspire Linden White Oak Cathedral Elm

5.0 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING

A neighborhood meeting was held on August 27, 2015 with residents and property owners that are affected by and being assessed for the improvements. Thirty one persons signed in at the meeting, representing 22 parcels/parcel groups. An estimated 40 to 50 total persons were in attendance. Owners of 268 parcels were invited. The City Engineer and Bolton & Menk, Inc. representatives presented the scope of the project with a discussion of existing and proposed street and utility conditions, project costs, projected assessments and schedule. Details related to assessment computation and payment options were provided. Aside from numerous questions that were addressed at the meeting, notable feedback from the residents included:

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. ESTIMATED COSTS 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 11

3rd St from 17th Ave to 18th Ave: general agreement of audience to widen road Concern expressed about 21st Ave with parking on both sides could prevent emergency

vehicle from passing quickly, but cars rarely park on 21st Ave, consider having one sided parking. Testimony contrary to this view was also voiced.

A pedestrian connection from 18th Avenue N and/or 19th Avenue N to the regional trail would be desired.

Some property owners expressed concerned that they recently had their services replaced. Attendees were advised that all services within the roadway will need to be replaced, but if services were replaced to the City’s main within 10 years, utility assessments would not apply to the property

Concern was expressed regarding traffic flow from Hwy 7 eastbound to 21st Avenue southbound, then quickly to 4th Street N eastbound (quick turns)

Concern was expressed over the temporary loss of access during construction where no alley exists.

Residents within the project area were mailed questionnaires. Sixty-six questionnaires were returned with comments. Roughly a quarter expressed concerns about drainage. Almost 70% of respondents opposed sidewalks. A number of residents also reported issues with the sanitary sewer service lines, with roots clogging the line being the most commonly reported issue. A summary of the findings from the questionnaires is presented in Appendix F.

6.0 ESTIMATED COSTS

Estimated construction costs presented in this report include a 10 percent contingency factor. Overhead costs, estimated at 25 percent, include legal, engineering, administrative and fiscal costs. Final costs and assessments will be determined by using low-bid construction costs of the proposed work.

Proposed construction costs for the 2016 Street and Utility Improvements (including curb and gutter, bituminous street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, and turf restoration) are itemized in Appendix A and are summarized in Table 6.1 below. These cost estimates are based upon public construction cost information. Since the consultant has no control over the cost of labor, materials, competitive bidding process, weather conditions and other factors affecting the cost of construction, all cost estimates are opinions for general information of the client and no warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy of construction cost estimates is made. It is recommended that costs for project financing should be based upon actual, competitive bid prices with reasonable contingencies.

Table 6.1 – Proposed Construction Cost

Subtotal of Proposed Street Improvements $2,044,400

Subtotal of Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements $301,800

Subtotal of Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements $562,200

Subtotal of Proposed Water Improvements $880,000

Street & Utility Subtotal $3,788,000

Contingencies (10%) $379,000

Engineering and Administration (25%) $1,042,000

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $5,209,000

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. ASSESSMENT RATES 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 12

7.0 ASSESSMENT RATES

Street improvements throughout the project area will be assessed to adjacent and benefitting properties according to practice deemed fair by the Council on recent projects and City policy. Street improvement work includes pavement removals, grading, subgrade correction, aggregate base, curbing, driveways and pavements construction, and restoration. Tree removals and replacement are also street improvements. Sheets A1 and B1 in Appendix C illustrates those properties included in the assessment roll and their projected total assessments by range. Each parcel is shaded by color according to the estimate range its total assessment falls within.

According to the City’s assessment policy, residential street improvement costs are assessed at 70% to the benefitting properties. The improvements in front of a parcel (generally, on avenues) are apportioned based on the front footage of the parcel. Improvements on the sides of corner parcels (generally, streets) are apportioned on a per unit basis to the block of parcels lying on either side of the improved street. The total assessment to a parcel for street improvements is the sum of the front footage assessment for front improvements and the unit assessment for upgrading the street(s) adjacent to the block the parcel is in.

To provide relief against excessive assessments, a cap exists in the policy based on assessment rates established on past similar projects. An assessment cap for residential properties of $83.79 per front foot has been established by adding 3% to the 2015 assessment cap according to City policy. This cap will be applied only to residential properties in the project area. The assessment cap is not applicable to non-residential properties. Excepting services, utility improvements, sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer are paid for 100% by their respective utility funds. Sheets A1 and B1 in Appendix C illustrates the assessable properties and the preliminary assessment associated with the properties. Total estimated assessments are $1,387,686.91.

Water services that have not been replaced within the last 10 years and sewer services which are not PVC will be replaced from the main to the City right-of-way. The cost of service line repairs are typically the responsibility of property owners. The City has split the cost of the service replacement 50/50 with the property owner on past projects. City staff recommends the 50/50 split be implemented again on the 2016 Improvement Project. The total estimated cost of the water service replacement is $1,500. With the proposed 50/50 split, $750 will be assessed to the property owner. The total estimated cost of the sewer service replacement is $1,250. With the proposed 50/50 split, $625 will be assessed to the property owner.

In the case that sanitary sewer services are made of Orangeburg or Transite, or are in disrepair between the property line and the house, replacement or lining of the entire line will be required. The City’s plumbing inspector is responsible for determining the condition of each service line. On past projects, the property owner has been given one year to affect the necessary repairs.

A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix C of this report.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. RIGHT-OF-WAY / EASEMENTS / PERMITS 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 13

8.0 RIGHT-OF-WAY / EASEMENTS / PERMITS

The majority of the proposed improvements will be limited to the existing street ROW along all corridors, but one area of right of way acquisition has been identified. Reconstruction of 21st Avenue North will most likely require acquisition of additional right of way or permanent easement on one property.

Several permits will also be required from other agencies for construction of the proposed improvements.

Watershed Districts

This projects is located in both the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD), see Figure 8.1. The MCWD stormwater management rule exempts linear transportation projects if the amount of new impervious area is less than 10,000 square feet. The NMCWD exempts linear transportation projects if the amount of new impervious area created is less than 1 acre (43,560 square feet). As proposed, this project will result in a reduction of the amount of impervious area in both watershed districts. The following table shows the amount of existing and proposed impervious area both watershed districts:

Table 8.1 – Watershed Districts

Impervious Area Minnehaha Creek WD Nine Mile Creek WD

Existing Impervious 162,738 sq. ft. 3.1 Acre

New Impervious 150,281 sq. ft. 2.9 Acre

Difference (12,457) sq. ft. (0.2) Acre

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. RIGHT-OF-WAY / EASEMENTS / PERMITS 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 14

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. PROJECT SCHEDULE 2016 Street & Utility Improvements ǀ T16.110077 Page 15

Both watershed districts require an erosion control permit for projects that disturb 5,000 square feet or more of surface area. This project exceeds this limit in both districts and thus an erosion/sediment control permit will be required for construction. Similarly, a construction stormwater permit from the MPCA will be required.

MnDOT

An existing 18-inch culvert is being removed and replaced in MnDOT right-of-way at the 21st Avenue North intersection with Trunk Highway 7. This will require a Miscellaneous Work on Trunk Highway Right-of-Way permit from MnDOT.

MnDOH

As is typical for watermain replacement, a permit will be required from the Minnesota Department of Health for this project.

9.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE

If this Feasibility Report is accepted by the City Council, the following schedule is proposed: Neighborhood Meeting .............................................................................................. August 27, 2015

Present Feasibility Report / Council Set Public Hearing Date ............................. September 15, 2015

Conduct Public Hearing / Accept Feasibility Report / Order Final Plans & Specifications .......................................................................... October 20, 2015

Preparation of Final Plans & Specifications ................................... October 21 – December 15, 2015

Approve Final Plans & Specifications / Set Bid Date / Set Assessment Hearing Authorize Advertisement for Bids ........................................................................ December 15, 2015

Bid Opening .............................................................................................................. January 13, 2015

Council Sets Public Assessment Hearing Date ......................................................... January 19, 2016

Council Accepts Bids / Conduct Public Assessment Hearing / Adopt Assessment Roll / Award Bid ...................................................................... February 16, 2016

Staged Construction ............................................................................................ April - October 2016

10.0 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION

From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary and can best be accomplished by letting competitive bids for the work. It is recommended that the work be done under one contract in order to complete the work in an orderly and efficient manner. The City, its financial consultant, and the persons assessed will have to determine the economic feasibility of the proposed improvements.

Appendix A: Preliminary Cost Estimates

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE2016 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF HOPKINS, MN

CITY PROJECT NO.

BMI PROJECT NO. T16.110077

1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 200,000.00$ 1.00 $200,000.00

2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (TREE) EACH 400.00$ 23 $9,200.00

3 TREE TRIMMING LUMP SUM 5,000.00$ 1 $5,000.00

4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TRAILS AND DRIVEWAYS) SQ YD 4.00$ 29894 $119,600.00

5 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT (WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, AND ALLEYS) SQ YD 6.00$ 3035 $18,200.00

6 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 3.00$ 15771 $47,300.00

7 REMOVE CONCRETE STEP EACH 100.00$ 78 $7,800.00

8 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH) LIN FT 5.00$ 2291 $11,500.00

9 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH) LIN FT 4.00$ 1034 $4,100.00

10 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 15.00$ 9570 $143,600.00

11 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 15.00$ 2901 $43,500.00

12 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD 20.00$ 2901 $58,000.00

13 TOPSOIL BORROW (SPECIAL) CU YD 25.00$ 1494 $37,400.00

14 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 450.00$ 32 $14,400.00

15 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 14.00$ 15230 $213,200.00

16 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SURFACING (GRAVEL DRIVEWAY) TON 29.00$ 18 $500.00

17 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS SURFACE (FULL-DEPTH) SQ YD 2.50$ 29024 $72,600.00

18 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) TON 83.00$ 3528 $292,800.00

19 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C) TON 78.00$ 3528 $275,200.00

20 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 4.60$ 1598 $7,400.00

21 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY & PAVEMENT (SPWEA240B) SQ YD 25.00$ 872 $21,800.00

22 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 3.70$ 11275 $41,700.00

23 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 42.00$ 24 $1,000.00

24 CONCRETE STEP EACH 225.00$ 78 $17,600.00

25 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 13.00$ 15046 $195,600.00

26 SPOT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REPLACEMENT LIN FT 27.00$ 80 $2,200.00

27 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SQ YD 50.00$ 1783 $89,200.00

28 8" CONCRETE ALLEY SQ YD 65.00$ 580 $37,700.00

29 ALLEY CONCRETE TIE-BARS EACH 22.00$ 218 $4,800.00

30 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 25,000.00$ 1 $25,000.00

31 ZEBRA CROSSWALK BLOCK - WHITE EPOXY SQ FT 7.00$ 108 $800.00

32 TRAFFIC SIGN POST EACH 193.00$ 35 $6,800.00

33 SIGN PANELS (TYPE C) SQ FT 59.00$ 52 $3,100.00

34 SIGN PANELS (TYPE D) SQ FT 63.00$ 17 $1,100.00

35 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE LUMP SUM 30,000.00$ 1 $30,000.00

36 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B EACH 350.00$ 49 $17,200.00

37 INLET PROTECTION EACH 150.00$ 38 $5,700.00

38 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HOUR 150.00$ 64 $9,600.00

39 TURF RESTORATION SQ YD 4.00$ 16831 $67,300.00

40 PARKING BAY STRIPING LUMP SUM 2,000.00$ 1 $2,000.00

41 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 4.00$ 5341 $21,400.00

42 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 500.00$ 21 $10,500.00

43 SANITARY MANHOLE CASTING EACH 650.00$ 21 $13,700.00

44 8" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 38.00$ 5341 $203,000.00

45 6" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 25.00$ 5379 $134,500.00

46 8" x 6" SDR 26 PVC SERVICE WYE EACH 200.00$ 163 $32,600.00

47 SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00$ 21 $52,500.00

48 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH 175.00$ 163 $28,500.00

49 CONNECT TO EXISTIING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00$ 1 $2,500.00

50 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE EACH 1,500.00$ 6 $9,000.00

51 SANITARY SEWER MAIN SPOT REPAIR EACH 5,000.00$ 3 $15,000.00

52 REMOVE WATERMAIN LIN FT 5.00$ 6432 $32,200.00

53 ABANDON WATERMAIN LIN FT 8.00$ 733 $5,900.00

54 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 300.00$ 9 $2,700.00

55 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 1,326.00$ 8 $10,600.00

56 HYDRANT EACH 3,832.00$ 9 $34,500.00

57 18" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX EACH 6,000.00$ 1 $6,000.00

58 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 1,800.00$ 26 $46,800.00

59 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 1,400.00$ 9 $12,600.00

60 8" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 48.00$ 6223 $298,700.00

61 6" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 42.00$ 180 $7,600.00

62 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 8" WATERMAIN (ALONG 3RD ST N, 20TH TO 21ST) LIN FT 125.00$ 733 $91,600.00

63 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 25.00$ 5577 $139,400.00

64 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 250.00$ 169 $42,300.00

65 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 175.00$ 169 $29,600.00

66 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 200.00$ 169 $33,800.00

67 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE EACH 275.00$ 169 $46,500.00

68 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 7.00$ 1128 $7,900.00

69 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 300.00$ 29 $8,700.00

70 STORM SEWER CASTING EACH 650.00$ 48 $31,200.00

71 15" RC PIPE SEWER CL V DESIGN 3006 (STORM) LIN FT 34.00$ 3456 $117,500.00

72 STORM MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00$ 10 $25,000.00

73 STORM CATCH BASIN EACH 1,500.00$ 38 $57,000.00

74 SAFL BAFFLE W/SUMP IN MANHOLE EACH 7,500.00$ 1 $7,500.00

75 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM PIPE EACH 750.00$ 8 $6,000.00

76 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 1,000.00$ 2 $2,000.00

$3,788,000.00$379,000.00

$1,042,000.00

$5,209,000.00

CONTINGENCIES (10%)

ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION (25%)

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST

TOTAL COST

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST

ITEM

NO.ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE

TOTAL

QUANTITY

Appendix B: Figures

cathrynde

Typewritten Text

FIGURE NO. 1.1

cathrynde

Typewritten Text

cathrynde

Typewritten Text

cathrynde

Typewritten Text

Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll

A

A

B

CD

F

G

G

H

H I J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q S U W Y

20TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

19TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

21ST

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

STATE HIGHWAY 7

2ND STREET NORTH

4TH STREET NORTH

3RD STREET NORTH

HCRRA CORRIDOR NORTH

WYNDHAM HILL DRIVE

17TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

2ND STREET NORTH

18TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

PARK ROAD WEST

4TH STREET NORTH

207211

214

221 222

204

229

211

217

234

220

209

217

217

221

221231230 226

228

300

220

226

223

341

220

204205

226 231

206

205

205210

202205

208216

215

224225 226

226 230

307

235

349

142145 142

233

200202

142

201

238238

244

227

200201 200

238239

245246243

239

238

241 241

249

244245

250

144

32530

143145

319

201

332

244256

313

254251

258 254251 257

304301

250

311

336

235 238 230

345

257

331

11609

232

349

305

300

314 308310

322

236250 245

251

314

337

349

337

320

342

350

310

301

358

302

322

318

342

350

330

338

210

218

309

307

Map D

ocum

ent: \

\MET

ROSO

UTH1

\gis\H

OPK\T

1611

0077

\ESRI

\Map

s\Hop

k_20

16_A

sses

smen

ts_11

x17L

.mxd

Date

Save

d: 8/2

7/201

5 11:4

2:18 A

M

2016 ImprovementsCity of Hopkins

Assessment Parcels - Sheet A1September, 2015

CLIENTLOGO

Legend

CityLimitsMap Book Index

TOTAL_PROP$1,000 - $2,500$2,500 - $4,500$4,500 - $6,500$6,500 - $8,500$8,500 +

Hopkins RoadsProposed Improvements

0 150Feet

I

Source: Hennepin County, City of Hopkins, ESRI Imagery

A

A

B

CD

E

E

F

G

H

H I J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

R

S

T

T

U

V

V

W

X

X

Y

Z

Z

A1

B1

Location Map

C

CD

E

E

Q

R

R

S

T

T

U

V

V

W

X

X

Y

Z

Z

MAINSTREET

17TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

18TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

19TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

SHADY OAK ROAD

20TH

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

OAKDRIVELANE

2NDSTREET

NORTH

OAK DRIVE LANE

1ST STREET NORTH

2ND STREET NORTH

21ST

AVEN

UE N

ORTH

130131122 121

121

1801

3736

201130

17211821

125122117122 118

1901

3445

116

42

126

133 134130

136 125

137

137134152

143 141

150

136

142

141137

145142

14

142

16

20 16

20

13

14

12

21

10

22

15

30 35

6 7

126133

129

23

126124

128

20

129

26

29

46

38 30 3130 3341

38

29

53

28

44 414554

45

111

121

8 9

101105

15

144

21

143

111 110

145

106110 109

101

114 118

104110

105

115

1625

125

117

108113

130142

112120

138

114

141

25

4337

42

102104

115

100102

1711

Map D

ocum

ent: \

\MET

ROSO

UTH1

\gis\H

OPK\T

1611

0077

\ESRI

\Map

s\Hop

k_20

16_A

sses

smen

ts_11

x17L

.mxd

Date

Save

d: 8/2

7/201

5 11:4

2:18 A

M

2016 ImprovementsCity of Hopkins

Assessment Parcels - Sheet B1September, 2015

CLIENTLOGO

Legend

CityLimitsMap Book Index

TOTAL_PROP$1,000 - $2,500$2,500 - $4,500$4,500 - $6,500$6,500 - $8,500$8,500 +

Hopkins RoadsProposed Improvements

0 150Feet

I

Source: Hennepin County, City of Hopkins, ESRI Imagery

A

A

B

CD

E

E

F

G

H

H I J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

R

S

T

T

U

V

V

W

X

X

Y

Z

Z

A1

B1

Location Map

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL2016 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF HOPKINS, MN

CITY PROJECT NO.


A B

ACTUAL

FRONT

FOOTAGE

ADJUSTED

FRONT

FOOTAGE

21ST

AVE N

20TH

AVE N

19TH

AVE N

18TH

AVE N

SUBTOTAL

FRONT FOOT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

2ND ST N 3RD ST N 4TH ST N ALLEY

SUBTOTAL

UNIT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

ASSESSMENT

RATE CAP PER

FRONT FOOT

STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER CAP

17TH AVE N

2311722410020 100 17TH AVE N JESSICA L WAGENDORF C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 100 17TH AVE N

2311722410019 104 17TH AVE N DIANE M LARSON C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 104 17TH AVE N

2311722410018 108 17TH AVE N WESLEY C HORGEN C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 108 17TH AVE N

2311722410017 116 17TH AVE N JASON BIHL & KIA BIHL C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 116 17TH AVE N

2311722410016 122 17TH AVE N JANE F DYE C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 122 17TH AVE N

2311722410015 126 17TH AVE N JEAN NUSBAUM C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 126 17TH AVE N

2311722410014 130 17TH AVE N JASON L OEHRLEIN C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 130 17TH AVE N

2311722410013 134 17TH AVE N CHARLES & RITSUKO LANDER C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 134 17TH AVE N

2311722410012 136 17TH AVE N SARA A KOBES/MICHAEL D KOBES C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 136 17TH AVE N

2311722410011 142 17TH AVE N ANDREW CARLSON/ALISON BONG C -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 142 17TH AVE N

2311722140120 200 17TH AVE N TODD & LEAH KEMPEL P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 200 17TH AVE N

2311722140119 204 17TH AVE N THOMAS D MEMMEN P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 204 17TH AVE N

2311722140118 208 17TH AVE N LEON E DUDA P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 208 17TH AVE N

2311722140117 220 17TH AVE N GERALD D DYKHOFF P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 220 17TH AVE N

2311722140116 226 17TH AVE N TAMARA J OBLACK P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 226 17TH AVE N

2311722140133 228 17TH AVE N FELIX BENITEZ/CONSUELO PEREA P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 228 17TH AVE N

2311722140132 230 17TH AVE N ROBERT L GASTON P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 230 17TH AVE N

2311722140146 232 17TH AVE N MATTHEW C SCHUBBE DONNA L SCHUBBE P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 232 17TH AVE N

2311722140145 236 17TH AVE N ALYSON K ELIAS & DAVID ELIAS P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 236 17TH AVE N

2311722140140 238 17TH AVE N MARY TESAREK P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 238 17TH AVE N

2311722140139 244 17TH AVE N GEORGE R CAVINESS P -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 3,679.02$ 244 17TH AVE N

2311722140005 304 17TH AVE N TROY D FINN O -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 304 17TH AVE N

2311722140004 308 17TH AVE N JAMES T KINSEY O -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 308 17TH AVE N

2311722140003 314 17TH AVE N DENNIS & AVIS MEUWISSEN O -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 3,486.36$ 314 17TH AVE N

TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 68,564.00$

ADDRESS ADDRESS

PROPOSED

STREET

ASSESSMENT

(Lesser of

Column A or B)

PROPOSED

SEWER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED

WATER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

TOTAL

PROPOSED

ASSESSMENT

FIGURE

GROUP

FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS PER POLICY

Not Applicable

UNIT ASSESSMENTS PER POLICY STREET ASSESSMENT CAP

STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

PID

Not Applicable

OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable


CITY OF HOPKINS, MN

CITY PROJECT NO.


A B

ACTUAL

FRONT

FOOTAGE

ADJUSTED

FRONT

FOOTAGE

21ST

AVE N

20TH

AVE N

19TH

AVE N

18TH

AVE N

SUBTOTAL

FRONT FOOT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY


SUBTOTAL

UNIT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

ASSESSMENT

RATE CAP PER

FRONT FOOT

STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER CAP

ADDRESS ADDRESS

PROPOSED

STREET

ASSESSMENT

(Lesser of

Column A or B)

PROPOSED

SEWER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED

WATER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

TOTAL

PROPOSED

ASSESSMENT

FIGURE

GROUP

FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS PER POLICY UNIT ASSESSMENTS PER POLICY STREET ASSESSMENT CAP

STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2

18TH AVE N

2311722410022 101 18TH AVE N DREW HATTON D 69.04 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 8,913.75$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 10,677.32$ 83.79$ 5,784.86$ 5,784.86$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,159.86$ 101 18TH AVE N

2311722410023 105 18TH AVE N JEFFREY S & DIANNE MATHISON D 50.96 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,579.45$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,343.02$ 83.79$ 4,269.94$ 4,269.94$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,644.94$ 105 18TH AVE N

2311722410024 113 18TH AVE N PAUL W HORGEN D 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 12,092.37$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 113 18TH AVE N

2311722410025 115 18TH AVE N MUI HANG LAM FUNG D 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 115 18TH AVE N

2311722410026 117 18TH AVE N LAURA E BIHL TRUSTEE D 55.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,101.05$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,864.62$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 117 18TH AVE N

2311722410027 121 18TH AVE N THOMAS R & KATHRYN E CATHERS D 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 121 18TH AVE N

2311722410028 125 18TH AVE N PATRICIA G SVIHEL D 55.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,101.05$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,864.62$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 125 18TH AVE N

2311722410029 129 18TH AVE N PAUL K STRAIT D 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 129 18TH AVE N

2311722410030 133 18TH AVE N JAMES G STAFFORD D 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 133 18TH AVE N

2311722410031 137 18TH AVE N DANICA KRIZIC D 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 137 18TH AVE N

2311722410032 141 18TH AVE N RICHARD ANDERSON D 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 141 18TH AVE N

2311722410033 143 18TH AVE N PAUL W OMMEN D 46.47 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,999.74$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,763.31$ 83.79$ 3,893.72$ 3,893.72$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,268.72$ 143 18TH AVE N

2311722410158 13 18TH AVE N RICHARD A KIEFER E 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,328.80$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 13 18TH AVE N

2311722410159 23 18TH AVE N HEIDI J WHITE E 87.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 11,232.57$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,232.57$ 83.79$ 7,289.73$ 7,289.73$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,664.73$ 23 18TH AVE N

2311722410160 29 18TH AVE N WILLIAM E & SANDRA G WARD E 86.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 11,103.46$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,103.46$ 83.79$ 7,205.94$ 7,205.94$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,580.94$ 29 18TH AVE N

2311722410161 31 18TH AVE N ROBERT BROICH & JEAN BROICH E 57.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,359.27$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,359.27$ 83.79$ 4,776.03$ 4,776.03$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,151.03$ 31 18TH AVE N

2311722410162 37 18TH AVE N SANDRA LEACH E 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,455.50$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 37 18TH AVE N

2311722410163 43 18TH AVE N M A CURTIS & L A FUNARI E 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,746.60$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 43 18TH AVE N

2311722410164 45 18TH AVE N PAUL G FARRELL E 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,746.60$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 45 18TH AVE N

2311722410157 7 18TH AVE N DANIEL B REINHOLD E 50.14 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,473.58$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,473.58$ 83.79$ 4,201.23$ 6,473.58$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,848.58$ 7 18TH AVE N

2311722410156 1721 MAINSTREET BRADLEY D HANSON E 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,328.80$ -$ 10,328.80$ 10,328.80$ 1721 MAINSTREET

2311722140020 300 18TH AVE N COMM INVOLVEMENT PROGRAMS K 100.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 12,911.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,911.00$ 83.79$ 8,379.00$ 8,379.00$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 9,754.00$ 300 18TH AVE N

2311722140019 314 18TH AVE N LON S ROGNESS K 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,328.80$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 314 18TH AVE N

2311722140018 322 18TH AVE N JOSEPH P DEAL K 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,746.60$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 322 18TH AVE N

2311722140017 332 18TH AVE N DANIEL W ENGLE K 67.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 8,650.37$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,650.37$ 83.79$ 5,613.93$ 5,613.93$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,988.93$ 332 18TH AVE N

2311722140016 336 18TH AVE N MARK W DALBEY K 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,328.80$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 336 18TH AVE N

2311722140015 342 18TH AVE N SUSAN M PAULY K 65.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 8,392.15$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,392.15$ 83.79$ 5,446.35$ 5,446.35$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,821.35$ 342 18TH AVE N

2311722140014 350 18TH AVE N BAMBI E/KRISTOFER L JOHNSON K 69.11 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 8,922.79$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,922.79$ 83.79$ 5,790.73$ 5,790.73$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,165.73$ 350 18TH AVE N

2311722140102 200 18TH AVE N JOEL & VALERIE HASH L 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 200 18TH AVE N

2311722140101 202 18TH AVE N THOMAS & ELIZABETH HOYHTYA L 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 202 18TH AVE N

2311722140100 210 18TH AVE N EMILY S & JESSE C PAUL L 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 210 18TH AVE N

2311722140099 216 18TH AVE N JON W HAGEN L 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 216 18TH AVE N

2311722140098 222 18TH AVE N LISA A & JONATHAN P PATRIDGE L 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 222 18TH AVE N

2311722140097 226 18TH AVE N JENNIFER LEE JANSON L 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 226 18TH AVE N

2311722140144 230 18TH AVE N JENNIFER KNUTSON L 37.95 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 4,899.72$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,663.29$ 83.79$ 3,179.83$ 3,179.83$ 312.50$ 375.00$ 3,867.33$ 230 18TH AVE N

2311722140143 234 18TH AVE N MILICA CALIC L 37.95 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 4,899.72$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,663.29$ 83.79$ 3,179.83$ 3,179.83$ 312.50$ 375.00$ 3,867.33$ 234 18TH AVE N

2311722140142 238 18TH AVE N BRUCE M SIMON L 44.05 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,687.30$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,450.87$ 83.79$ 3,690.95$ 3,690.95$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,065.95$ 238 18TH AVE N

2311722140093 244 18TH AVE N MARIA T WOJCIECHOWSKI L 55.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,101.05$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,864.62$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 244 18TH AVE N

2311722140092 250 18TH AVE N ALLEN H BARNES L 55.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,101.05$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,864.62$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 250 18TH AVE N

2311722140091 254 18TH AVE N JACK C PRATT L 68.61 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 8,858.24$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 10,621.81$ 83.79$ 5,748.83$ 5,748.83$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,123.83$ 254 18TH AVE N

2311722140006 301 18TH AVE N WILLIAM K SCHREIFELS M 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 8,650.76$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 301 18TH AVE N

2311722140007 307 18TH AVE N ROBERT & KRISTIN ENGDALE M 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 13,815.16$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 307 18TH AVE N

2311722140008 313 18TH AVE N RISA L ANDERSON M 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 9,941.86$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 313 18TH AVE N

2311722140009 319 18TH AVE N GARY L RENSTROM M 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 11,232.96$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 319 18TH AVE N

2311722140010 325 18TH AVE N GARY L RENSTROM M 55.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,101.05$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 10,587.41$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 325 18TH AVE N

2311722140011 331 18TH AVE N THOMAS LOFTUS M 55.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,101.05$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 10,587.41$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 331 18TH AVE N

2311722140012 337 18TH AVE N ANDREW T LUETGERS M 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 11,232.96$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 337 18TH AVE N

2311722140013 341 18TH AVE N RICHARD D ANDERSON M 81.26 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,491.48$ -$ 1,915.45$ -$ 1,570.91$ 3,486.36$ 13,977.84$ 83.79$ 6,808.78$ 6,808.78$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,183.78$ 341 18TH AVE N

2311722140121 205 18TH AVE N TODD KING & COLLEEN KING N 65.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 8,392.15$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 12,071.17$ 83.79$ 5,446.35$ 5,446.35$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,821.35$ 205 18TH AVE N

2311722140122 207 18TH AVE N APACHE INVESTMENTS LLC N 65.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 8,392.15$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 12,071.17$ 83.79$ 5,446.35$ 5,446.35$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,821.35$ 207 18TH AVE N

2311722140123 211 18TH AVE N STEVEN R & KATHY M MOLZAHN N 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 10,134.52$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 211 18TH AVE N

2311722140124 217 18TH AVE N JILL M DEMARIS N 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 11,425.62$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 217 18TH AVE N

2311722140125 221 18TH AVE N KURT M BRADLEY N 71.50 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 9,231.37$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 12,910.39$ 83.79$ 5,990.99$ 5,990.99$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,365.99$ 221 18TH AVE N

2311722140141 223 18TH AVE N LAWRENCE & KATHERINE ARLT N 48.50 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,261.84$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 9,940.86$ 83.79$ 4,063.82$ 4,063.82$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,438.82$ 223 18TH AVE N

2311722140128 227 18TH AVE N SONAM WANGYAL N 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 8,843.42$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 227 18TH AVE N

2311722140147 241 18TH AVE N JEAN M OKEEFE N 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 8,843.42$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 241 18TH AVE N

2311722140148 245 18TH AVE N GERARD BALAN JR N 35.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 4,518.85$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 8,197.87$ 83.79$ 2,932.65$ 2,932.65$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,307.65$ 245 18TH AVE N

2311722140130 251 18TH AVE N KATHLEEN KOPESKY N 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 10,134.52$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 251 18TH AVE N

2311722140131 257 18TH AVE N TIMOTHY R & JODI D OGARA N 53.68 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,930.62$ 1,763.57$ 1,915.45$ -$ -$ 3,679.02$ 10,609.64$ 83.79$ 4,497.85$ 4,497.85$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,872.85$ 257 18TH AVE N

2311722410173 102 18TH AVE N NATHANIEL J GANSEN KIMBERLY SAPAN Y 45.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,809.95$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,573.52$ 83.79$ 3,770.55$ 3,770.55$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,145.55$ 102 18TH AVE N

2311722410172 106 18TH AVE N JOSEPH TURSICH NICOLE TURSICH Y 45.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,809.95$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,573.52$ 83.79$ 3,770.55$ 3,770.55$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,145.55$ 106 18TH AVE N

2311722410043 110 18TH AVE N REFUGIO DEL CARMEN VILLALTA Y 70.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 9,037.70$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 10,801.27$ 83.79$ 5,865.30$ 5,865.30$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,240.30$ 110 18TH AVE N

2311722410042 112 18TH AVE N ANDREW W BRAUN Y 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 112 18TH AVE N

2311722410041 114 18TH AVE N 114 18TH AVE N HPKNS MN TRST Y 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 6,927.97$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 114 18TH AVE N

2311722410040 118 18TH AVE N ANDREW J GRZESKOWIAK Y 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 118 18TH AVE N

2311722410039 122 18TH AVE N KAREN R NELSON Y 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 122 18TH AVE N

2311722410038 124 18TH AVE N BRENDA J WARD Y 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 124 18TH AVE N

2311722410037 128 18TH AVE N JOHN T LEE Y 50.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 6,455.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,219.07$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 128 18TH AVE N

2311722410165 138 18TH AVE N DANETTE A CARLSON Y 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 12,092.37$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 138 18TH AVE N

2311722410034 142 18TH AVE N JONATHON T HEINONEN Y 86.27 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 11,138.32$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 12,901.89$ 83.79$ 7,228.56$ 7,228.56$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,603.56$ 142 18TH AVE N

2311722410131 10 18TH AVE N THOMASINE GLOMSKI Z 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,164.40$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 10 18TH AVE N

2311722410130 14 18TH AVE N DOUGLAS C TIFFT Z 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,164.40$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 14 18TH AVE N

2311722410129 16 18TH AVE N CLAIRE P LOESCH JOSEPH R KIEFER Z 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,164.40$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 16 18TH AVE N

2311722410128 20 18TH AVE N TIMOTHY H BECKER Z 40.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,164.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,164.40$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 20 18TH AVE N

2311722410127 26 18TH AVE N DENNIS A STENGER Z 80.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 10,328.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,328.80$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 26 18TH AVE N

2311722410126 30 18TH AVE N TIMOTHY J & ASHLEY S RAYMOND Z 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,746.60$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 30 18TH AVE N

2311722410125 34 18TH AVE N IRENE DORIS ANDERS Z 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,746.60$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 34 18TH AVE N

2311722410124 38 18TH AVE N ADAM CARL BRISTOR MELANIE MARTHA BRISTOR Z 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,746.60$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 38 18TH AVE N


CITY OF HOPKINS, MN

CITY PROJECT NO.


A B

ACTUAL

FRONT

FOOTAGE

ADJUSTED

FRONT

FOOTAGE

21ST

AVE N

20TH

AVE N

19TH

AVE N

18TH

AVE N

SUBTOTAL

FRONT FOOT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY


SUBTOTAL

UNIT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

ASSESSMENT

RATE CAP PER

FRONT FOOT

STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER CAP

ADDRESS ADDRESS

PROPOSED

STREET

ASSESSMENT

(Lesser of

Column A or B)

PROPOSED

SEWER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED

WATER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

TOTAL

PROPOSED

ASSESSMENT

FIGURE

GROUP


STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY


2311722410123 42 18TH AVE N MARVIN JEROME WELCH Z 60.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 7,746.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,746.60$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 42 18TH AVE N

2311722410021 1711 1ST ST N SARA VANDENBERG C -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1711 1ST ST N

2311722410133 6 18TH AVE N THOMAS & PATRICIA ALDRIDGE Z 39.59 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 5,111.46$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,111.46$ 5,111.46$ 1,705.00$ 3,150.00$ 9,966.46$ 6 18TH AVE N

2311722410132 1801 MAINSTREET THOMAS & PATRICIA ALDRIDGE Z 90.00 -$ -$ -$ 129.11$ 11,619.90$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,619.90$ 11,619.90$ 11,619.90$ 1801 MAINSTREET

TOTAL 4592.08 TOTAL 507,659.92$

19TH AVE N

2311722140137 302 19TH AVE N SUZETTE MARIE STEPPE G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 302 19TH AVE N

2311722140037 310 19TH AVE N JEFFREY & VIRGINIA HEBEISEN G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 310 19TH AVE N

2311722140036 318 19TH AVE N MARY KEALY-FALK/WALTER FALK G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 318 19TH AVE N

2311722140035 322 19TH AVE N ROBERT T VEALETZEK G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 322 19TH AVE N

2311722140034 330 19TH AVE N SANDRA K BOURESSA G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 330 19TH AVE N

2311722140033 338 19TH AVE N RICHARD A FOX G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 338 19TH AVE N

2311722140032 342 19TH AVE N SCOTT J & CHAYANNE R SWENSON G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 342 19TH AVE N

2311722140031 350 19TH AVE N ROBERT A MATTSON G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 350 19TH AVE N

2311722140030 358 19TH AVE N JEFFREY A MERFELD G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 358 19TH AVE N

2311722140080 200 19TH AVE N KIRK & PATRICIA SMITH I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 200 19TH AVE N

2311722140079 206 19TH AVE N KENDRA THIRY I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 206 19TH AVE N

2311722140078 220 19TH AVE N GUADALUPE A DEWEY I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 220 19TH AVE N

2311722140077 224 19TH AVE N M V LEVIN SUPPLEMENTAL NEED TRUST I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 224 19TH AVE N

2311722140076 226 19TH AVE N SUMMER L HEDLUND I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 226 19TH AVE N

2311722140075 238 19TH AVE N JOHN N TIMMERS I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 238 19TH AVE N

2311722140074 244 19TH AVE N ROGER RIENSTRA I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 244 19TH AVE N

2311722140150 254 19TH AVE N NICOLAS E MONTOYA I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 254 19TH AVE N

2311722140149 258 19TH AVE N RYAN M MACKAY I -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 258 19TH AVE N

2311722140103 201 19TH AVE N MARGIE A OLSON J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 201 19TH AVE N

2311722140104 205 19TH AVE N DAVID P SCHULTZ J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 205 19TH AVE N

2311722140105 217 19TH AVE N ERIN GONSIOR J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 217 19TH AVE N

2311722140106 221 19TH AVE N TAMARIS A & FRED W WILLIAMS J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 221 19TH AVE N

2311722140107 231 19TH AVE N PAUL L SMITH J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 231 19TH AVE N

2311722140108 235 19TH AVE N ROBERT J HAGEL J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 235 19TH AVE N

2311722140109 239 19TH AVE N SCOTT M ENDRES J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 239 19TH AVE N

2311722140110 245 19TH AVE N MICHAEL MALONEY BETH MALONEY J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 245 19TH AVE N

2311722140111 249 19TH AVE N SHEHAN DEALWIS J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 249 19TH AVE N

2311722140112 257 19TH AVE N JEREMY GRENZ J -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 257 19TH AVE N

2311722410065 102 19TH AVE N MARK S & LISA K FEESE U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 102 19TH AVE N

2311722410171 110 19TH AVE N JACOB SWIFT U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 110 19TH AVE N

2311722410062 118 19TH AVE N BYRON E & JENNIFER P DOWNS U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 118 19TH AVE N

2311722410061 126 19TH AVE N PAULA J ROLF U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 126 19TH AVE N

2311722410060 130 19TH AVE N MICHAEL C LEIZINGER U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 130 19TH AVE N

2311722410059 136 19TH AVE N E & J HOLDINGS L L C U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 136 19TH AVE N

2311722410058 142 19TH AVE N BRENT VARGO & PAULA VARGO U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 142 19TH AVE N

2311722410055 144 19TH AVE N KRISTIN L AUNE U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 144 19TH AVE N

2311722410057 150 19TH AVE N GREGORY E ABBOTT U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 150 19TH AVE N

2311722410056 152 19TH AVE N KIMBERLY M KNUTTILA TARI A TANHOFF U -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 152 19TH AVE N

2311722410110 8 19TH AVE N DANIEL J & MARTHA BEVINS V 80.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 10,098.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,098.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 8 19TH AVE N

2311722410109 14 19TH AVE N MARY ETTA JAY V 80.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 10,098.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,098.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 14 19TH AVE N

2311722410108 16 19TH AVE N BRIDGETT L WAGENER V 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 16 19TH AVE N

2311722410107 20 19TH AVE N COLIN E RYAN PATRICK J RYAN V 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 20 19TH AVE N

2311722410178 28 19TH AVE N PETER L TIMINSKI KELLI A TIMINSKI V 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 28 19TH AVE N

2311722410177 30 19TH AVE N RENE GUNNAR DEDON V 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 30 19TH AVE N

2311722410104 36 19TH AVE N KELLY D NESS V 80.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 10,098.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,098.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 36 19TH AVE N

2311722410103 44 19TH AVE N MS THERESA GMITERKO V 80.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 10,098.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,098.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 44 19TH AVE N

2311722410111 1901 MAINSTREET M & L WILLIAMS LLC V 126.38 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 15,952.95$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,952.95$ 15,952.95$ 1,705.00$ 17,657.95$ 1901 MAINSTREET

2311722410045 101 19TH AVE N MR & MRS ROBERT W IRRGANG W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 101 19TH AVE N

2311722410046 109 19TH AVE N EDWIN I MACDONALD W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 109 19TH AVE N

2311722410047 111 19TH AVE N JAMES A & SUSAN K HUTTNER W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 111 19TH AVE N

2311722410048 117 19TH AVE N 117 19TH AVENUE NORTH LLC W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 117 19TH AVE N

2311722410049 121 19TH AVE N BRUCE PROKOSCH W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 121 19TH AVE N

2311722410050 125 19TH AVE N ERIK D DAVIS W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 125 19TH AVE N

2311722410051 129 19TH AVE N CARSON J & KATHRYN E LIND W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 129 19TH AVE N

2311722410052 137 19TH AVE N KELLY R KING W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 137 19TH AVE N

2311722410053 141 19TH AVE N SHIRLEY J CARROLL W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 141 19TH AVE N

2311722410054 145 19TH AVE N PETER LEIH W -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 1,763.57$ 145 19TH AVE N

2311722410136 9 19TH AVE N ANTHONY E PATRIDGE X 80.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 10,098.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,098.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 9 19TH AVE N

2311722410137 15 19TH AVE N VIRGINIA M SCHOUVILLER X 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 15 19TH AVE N

2311722410138 21 19TH AVE N HOUN KOUNLABOUT X 60.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 7,573.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,573.80$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 21 19TH AVE N

2311722410139 25 19TH AVE N ARTHUR BELL X 60.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 7,573.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,573.80$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 25 19TH AVE N

2311722410140 29 19TH AVE N CHRISTOPHER P FLOTTMAN MELANIE BALASA-FLOTTMAN X 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 29 19TH AVE N

2311722410141 33 19TH AVE N DELORES RELL X 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 33 19TH AVE N

2311722410142 37 19TH AVE N PAUL L CARLSON X 80.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 10,098.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,098.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 37 19TH AVE N

2311722410143 41 19TH AVE N BETH C LAUZON DAVID R LAUZON X 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 41 19TH AVE N

2311722410144 45 19TH AVE N DENNIS G DONAT X 40.00 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 5,049.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,049.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 45 19TH AVE N

2311722410135 1821 MAINSTREET 1821 MAINSTREET LLC X 126.95 -$ -$ 126.23$ -$ 16,024.90$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,024.90$ -$ 16,024.90$ 16,024.90$ 1821 MAINSTREET

TOTAL 1213.33 TOTAL 221,179.93$

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable


CITY OF HOPKINS, MN

CITY PROJECT NO.


A B

ACTUAL

FRONT

FOOTAGE

ADJUSTED

FRONT

FOOTAGE

21ST

AVE N

20TH

AVE N

19TH

AVE N

18TH

AVE N

SUBTOTAL

FRONT FOOT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY


SUBTOTAL

UNIT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

ASSESSMENT

RATE CAP PER

FRONT FOOT

STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER CAP

ADDRESS ADDRESS

PROPOSED

STREET

ASSESSMENT

(Lesser of

Column A or B)

PROPOSED

SEWER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED

WATER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

TOTAL

PROPOSED

ASSESSMENT

FIGURE

GROUP


STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY


20TH AVE N

2311722140062 202 20TH AVE N BRETT R HOWELLS JESSICA LARSON F 65.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,716.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,716.50$ 83.79$ 5,446.35$ 5,446.35$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,821.35$ 202 20TH AVE N

2311722140061 204 20TH AVE N NICOLE D WITTRIG F 55.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 7,375.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,375.50$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 204 20TH AVE N

2311722140060 214 20TH AVE N PAUL D DUGAN F 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 214 20TH AVE N

2311722140059 220 20TH AVE N TIM LABBE F 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 220 20TH AVE N

2311722140058 226 20TH AVE N IOSIF GALPERIN NATALIE GALPERIN F 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 226 20TH AVE N

2311722140153 230 20TH AVE N KELLEN FISH & ERIN GERRITS F 59.89 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,031.25$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,031.25$ 83.79$ 5,018.18$ 5,018.18$ 5,018.18$ 230 20TH AVE N

2311722140056 238 20TH AVE N ELAINE A CHRISTENSON F 75.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,057.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,057.50$ 83.79$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,659.25$ 238 20TH AVE N

2311722140055 246 20TH AVE N DANIEL & AMY BANKS F 85.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 11,398.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,398.50$ 83.79$ 7,122.15$ 7,122.15$ 625.00$ 7,747.15$ 246 20TH AVE N

2311722140054 250 20TH AVE N KAREN L GEHRKE F 78.40 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,513.44$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,513.44$ 83.79$ 6,569.14$ 6,569.14$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,944.14$ 250 20TH AVE N

2311722140081 201 20TH AVE N AMANDA SPAETH H 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,127.57$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 201 20TH AVE N

2311722140082 205 20TH AVE N DALE J & JANE M SPECKEN H 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 9,809.57$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 205 20TH AVE N

2311722140083 211 20TH AVE N SCOTT E COFFMAN H 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 9,809.57$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 211 20TH AVE N

2311722140084 215 20TH AVE N L SCHLAGEL & C R STEINBRUNN H 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,468.57$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 215 20TH AVE N

2311722140085 217 20TH AVE N RAYMOND M & JOAN E BAST H 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 12,491.57$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 217 20TH AVE N

2311722140086 231 20TH AVE N JOSEPH D LARSON DAVID M LARSON H 70.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 9,387.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 11,150.57$ 83.79$ 5,865.30$ 5,865.30$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,240.30$ 231 20TH AVE N

2311722140087 235 20TH AVE N FRANCIS & NANCY PREPODNIK H 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,127.57$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 235 20TH AVE N

2311722140088 241 20TH AVE N KEVIN & JULIE EIDEN H 55.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 7,375.50$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 9,139.07$ 83.79$ 4,608.45$ 4,608.45$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,983.45$ 241 20TH AVE N

2311722140089 245 20TH AVE N JULIE L CAOUETTE H 72.50 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 9,722.25$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 11,485.82$ 83.79$ 6,074.78$ 6,074.78$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,449.78$ 245 20TH AVE N

2311722140090 251 20TH AVE N REYNOLD SANDQUIST H 53.43 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 7,164.96$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,928.53$ 83.79$ 4,476.90$ 4,476.90$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,851.90$ 251 20TH AVE N

2311722140138 301 20TH AVE N M A VAN OORT & S L MILLER H 63.83 63.83 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,559.60$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 10,323.17$ 83.79$ 5,348.32$ 5,348.32$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,723.32$ 301 20TH AVE N

2311722140039 307 20TH AVE N CHARLES H WATSON G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 307 20TH AVE N

2311722140040 309 20TH AVE N REBECCA H FOBES G -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 1,656.05$ 309 20TH AVE N

2311722410087 104 20TH AVE N DIANNE L DEJOLSVAY Q 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 104 20TH AVE N

2311722410168 110 20TH AVE N SARAH L KLOSTERBUER Q 66.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,850.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,850.60$ 83.79$ 5,530.14$ 5,530.14$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,905.14$ 110 20TH AVE N

2311722410084 114 20TH AVE N MURIEL ANN RYAN Q 74.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 9,923.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,923.40$ 83.79$ 6,200.46$ 6,200.46$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,575.46$ 114 20TH AVE N

2311722410083 120 20TH AVE N CRAIG R KOHNER Q 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 120 20TH AVE N

2311722410167 122 20TH AVE N NEGRI LAMA & KALSANG LAMA Q 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 122 20TH AVE N

2311722410080 126 20TH AVE N JEFFREY L PALM Q 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 126 20TH AVE N

2311722410079 130 20TH AVE N LEIGH N JENSEN Q 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 130 20TH AVE N

2311722410078 134 20TH AVE N DEBRA & ROBERT CHAMBERLAIN Q 92.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 12,337.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,337.20$ 83.79$ 7,708.68$ 7,708.68$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 9,083.68$ 134 20TH AVE N

2311722410077 142 20TH AVE N PAUL & LINDA SWANSON Q 71.81 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 9,629.72$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,629.72$ 83.79$ 6,016.96$ 6,016.96$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,391.96$ 142 20TH AVE N

2311722410097 12 20TH AVE N CALVIN LUCAS & NORA LUCAS R 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 12 20TH AVE N

2311722410096 16 20TH AVE N JONG I LEE KATHLEEN M STENNES R 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 16 20TH AVE N

2311722410095 20 20TH AVE N MARTIN HOFF R 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 20 20TH AVE N

2311722410094 22 20TH AVE N DALE C NELSON R 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 22 20TH AVE N

2311722410093 30 20TH AVE N A G BUNTROCK R 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 30 20TH AVE N

2311722410092 38 20TH AVE N DANIEL M MEYERS R 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 38 20TH AVE N

2311722410091 42 20TH AVE N SHELDON E/CATHERINE R HASSE R 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 42 20TH AVE N

2311722410090 46 20TH AVE N CHARLES & MARY ROMPORTL R 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 46 20TH AVE N

2311722410089 54 20TH AVE N MARK A & JANET G ZEUG R 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 54 20TH AVE N

2311722410174 2011 MAINSTREET GREGORY O SMITH R 123.20 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 16,521.12$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,521.12$ 16,521.12$ 1,705.00$ 3,150.00$ 21,376.12$ 2011 MAINSTREET

2311722410066 105 20TH AVE N MICHAEL THOMAS S 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 12,491.57$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 105 20TH AVE N

2311722410067 111 20TH AVE N BRIAN M BAKER S 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,468.57$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 111 20TH AVE N

2311722410068 115 20TH AVE N CATHERINE J BERRY PAUL J BERRY S 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,468.57$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 115 20TH AVE N

2311722410069 121 20TH AVE N BRUCE HOEKE & DARLENE HOEKE S 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,468.57$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 121 20TH AVE N

2311722410070 125 20TH AVE N JERIMIAH OLSON S 50.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 6,705.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 8,468.57$ 83.79$ 4,189.50$ 4,189.50$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,564.50$ 125 20TH AVE N

2311722410071 131 20TH AVE N RACHEL H IMBROCK S 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 9,809.57$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 131 20TH AVE N

2311722410072 133 20TH AVE N DAVID A HORNER S 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 9,809.57$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 133 20TH AVE N

2311722410073 137 20TH AVE N STEPHANIE R SCHILL S 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,127.57$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 137 20TH AVE N

2311722410074 141 20TH AVE N TRACI C DALLMAN S 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 12,491.57$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 141 20TH AVE N

2311722410075 143 20TH AVE N BENJAMIN ELLIOTT S 40.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,364.00$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,127.57$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 143 20TH AVE N

2311722410076 145 20TH AVE N CHRISTOPHER R POLSTON MARIA V JARALAMBIDES S 44.41 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 5,955.38$ 1,763.57$ -$ -$ -$ 1,763.57$ 7,718.95$ 83.79$ 3,721.11$ 3,721.11$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,096.11$ 145 20TH AVE N

2311722410175 15 20TH AVE N JOEL VASSAR & ERIN VASSAR T 90.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 12,069.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,069.00$ 83.79$ 7,541.10$ 7,541.10$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,916.10$ 15 20TH AVE N

2311722410117 21 20TH AVE N DEE ANNE & DEREK JONES T 70.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 9,387.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,387.00$ 83.79$ 5,865.30$ 5,865.30$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,240.30$ 21 20TH AVE N

2311722410118 25 20TH AVE N JOHN W WOODRICH JAMES W WOODRICH T 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 25 20TH AVE N

2311722410119 35 20TH AVE N KAREN GARDNER JOHNSON T 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 35 20TH AVE N

2311722410120 41 20TH AVE N PHILLIP SMITH T 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 41 20TH AVE N

2311722410121 45 20TH AVE N KG DUPLEX LLC T 60.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,046.00$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 45 20TH AVE N

2311722410122 53 20TH AVE N PETER KAPSNER T 80.00 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,728.00$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 53 20TH AVE N

2311722410114 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JILL M B & ROBERT BOYAT JR T 123.75 -$ 134.10$ -$ -$ 16,594.88$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,594.88$ 16,594.88$ 16,594.88$ 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED

TOTAL 3638.22 TOTAL 396,187.61$

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable


CITY OF HOPKINS, MN

CITY PROJECT NO.


A B

ACTUAL

FRONT

FOOTAGE

ADJUSTED

FRONT

FOOTAGE

21ST

AVE N

20TH

AVE N

19TH

AVE N

18TH

AVE N

SUBTOTAL

FRONT FOOT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY


SUBTOTAL

UNIT

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY

ASSESSMENT

RATE CAP PER

FRONT FOOT

STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER CAP

ADDRESS ADDRESS

PROPOSED

STREET

ASSESSMENT

(Lesser of

Column A or B)

PROPOSED

SEWER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED

WATER

SERVICE

ASSESSMENT

TOTAL

PROPOSED

ASSESSMENT

FIGURE

GROUP


STREET

ASSESSMENT

PER POLICY


21ST AVE N

2311722130032 210 21ST AVE N HUBERT E/SHARON M P VASSAR A 75.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ 83.79$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 750.00$ 7,034.25$ 210 21ST AVE N

2311722130031 218 21ST AVE N ROBERT E MCDONALD A 75.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ 83.79$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,659.25$ 218 21ST AVE N

2311722130030 226 21ST AVE N ROY F VOLLRATH A 75.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ 83.79$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,659.25$ 226 21ST AVE N

2311722130029 238 21ST AVE N JENNIFER PRICE THOMAS A 75.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ 83.79$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,659.25$ 238 21ST AVE N

2311722130028 250 21ST AVE N BRIDGET A ALBANI A 75.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ 83.79$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,659.25$ 250 21ST AVE N

2311722130044 256 21ST AVE N ELIZABETH I WILLE A 80.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 10,658.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,658.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 8,078.20$ 256 21ST AVE N

2311722130043 300 21ST AVE N DEBRA DAWN BARNES A 83.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 11,058.09$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,058.09$ 83.79$ 6,954.57$ 6,954.57$ 750.00$ 7,704.57$ 300 21ST AVE N

2311722130003 310 21ST AVE N JOSEPH S STOUTENBURGH JR A 160.40 125.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 16,653.75$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,653.75$ 83.79$ 10,473.75$ 10,473.75$ 750.00$ 11,223.75$ 310 21ST AVE N

2311722130047 320 21ST AVE N MEREDITH W SIMS A 177.00 125.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 16,653.75$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,653.75$ 83.79$ 10,473.75$ 10,473.75$ 750.00$ 11,223.75$ 320 21ST AVE N

2311722130001 11609 STATE HWY NO 7 JAMES L MEYERS A 209.24 125.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 16,653.75$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,653.75$ 83.79$ 10,473.75$ 10,473.75$ 750.00$ 11,223.75$ 11609 STATE HWY NO 7

2311722140045 305 21ST AVE N STEVEN R & JANA K ROBERTS B 200.00 125.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 16,653.75$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 18,309.80$ 83.79$ 10,473.75$ 10,473.75$ 750.00$ 11,223.75$ 305 21ST AVE N

2311722140046 311 21ST AVE N RYAN P SULLIVAN JANAE L OLSON B 80.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 10,658.40$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 12,314.45$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 750.00$ 7,453.20$ 311 21ST AVE N

2311722140048 337 21ST AVE N EUGENE J MAXWELL B 80.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 10,658.40$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 12,314.45$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 750.00$ 7,453.20$ 337 21ST AVE N

2311722140047 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED EUGENE & EILEEN MAXWELL B 40.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 5,329.20$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 6,985.25$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED

2311722140152 345 21ST AVE N ERIC & PAMELA LUNDEQUAM B 75.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 9,992.25$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 11,648.30$ 83.79$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 6,284.25$ 345 21ST AVE N

2311722140051 349 21ST AVE N PETER J ANDERSEN SR TRUSTEE B 35.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 4,663.05$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 6,319.10$ 83.79$ 2,932.65$ 2,932.65$ 750.00$ 3,682.65$ 349 21ST AVE N

2311722140052 349 21ST AVE N PETER J ANDERSEN SR TRUSTEE B 35.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 4,663.05$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 6,319.10$ 83.79$ 2,932.65$ 2,932.65$ 2,932.65$ 349 21ST AVE N

2311722140053 349 21ST AVE N TROY T GAMBUCCI B 33.36 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 4,444.55$ -$ -$ 1,656.05$ -$ 1,656.05$ 6,100.60$ 83.79$ 2,795.23$ 2,795.23$ 750.00$ 3,545.23$ 349 21ST AVE N

2311722140063 201 21ST AVE N GLYDEWELL B BURDICK JR A 60.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 750.00$ 5,777.40$ 201 21ST AVE N

2311722140064 205 21ST AVE N WILLIAM ELLERBROCK DEANNA KORTAN A 60.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 750.00$ 5,777.40$ 205 21ST AVE N

2311722140134 209 21ST AVE N REUBEN T GUSTAVSON A 80.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 10,658.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,658.40$ 83.79$ 6,703.20$ 6,703.20$ 625.00$ 7,328.20$ 209 21ST AVE N

2311722140067 221 21ST AVE N MICHAEL FRIES A 40.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 5,329.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,329.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 221 21ST AVE N

2311722140068 225 21ST AVE N MICHAEL LAPIC A 40.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 5,329.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,329.20$ 83.79$ 3,351.60$ 3,351.60$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 4,726.60$ 225 21ST AVE N

2311722140069 229 21ST AVE N RONALD DEL CASTILLO A 60.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 229 21ST AVE N

2311722140070 233 21ST AVE N SUSAN KAY SALOKA A 60.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,993.80$ 83.79$ 5,027.40$ 5,027.40$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,402.40$ 233 21ST AVE N

2311722140135 239 21ST AVE N JEROME C JUELICH A 54.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 7,194.42$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,194.42$ 83.79$ 4,524.66$ 4,524.66$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 5,899.66$ 239 21ST AVE N

2311722140136 243 21ST AVE N JEROME C JUELICH A 66.00 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 8,793.18$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,793.18$ 83.79$ 5,530.14$ 5,530.14$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 6,905.14$ 243 21ST AVE N

2311722140072 251 21ST AVE N DON A BATES A 68.30 133.23$ -$ -$ -$ 9,099.61$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,099.61$ 83.79$ 5,722.86$ 5,722.86$ 625.00$ 750.00$ 7,097.86$ 251 21ST AVE N

TOTAL 2251.30 TOTAL 194,095.46$

Appendix D: Resident Questionnaire

CITY OF HOPKINS PUBLIC WORKS-ENGINEERING DIVISION

2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

PLEASE RETURN TO CITY HALL (1010 1ST ST S, HOPKINS MN 55343) BY: AUGUST 21, 2015

Street and utility improvements are proposed for your street in 2016. This questionnaire is

a valuable resource for the City in identifying issues to receive attention. Your comments

and concerns are greatly appreciated.

1. DRAINAGE _____ I have observed standing water in the street or my front yard after a significant rain. It is located at: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2. SANITARY SEWER _____ We have experienced no problems with our sanitary sewer service. _____ We have experienced problems or replaced our sewer service. Please describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3. WATERMAIN _____ We have experienced no problems with our water service. _____ We have experienced problems or replaced our water service. Please describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 4. SIDEWALKS Do you have interest in seeing additional sidewalks within your neighborhood? If so, where? _____________________________________________________________________________________ 5. IRRIGATION SYSTEM / INVISIBLE FENCE _____ Yes, we have an irrigation system. _____ Yes, we have an invisible pet fence. 6. TREES / LANDSCAPING Do you have concerns about trees or landscaping in your front yard? If so, describe. _____________________________________________________________________________________

7. GENERAL COMMENTS / QUESTIONS Please describe any issues you suggest be considered as part of this project: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The following information is optional but is useful if we have a question about your responses: Name:________________________________________________ Phone No.:______________________ Address:_______________________________________________

THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE!

Should you have any questions please contact Nate Stanley, City Engineer, at 952-548-6356 or

[email protected] or Mike Waltman at 612-221-6946 or [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Drainage Yes No Blank Sanitary Yes No Blank Watermain Yes No Blank

15 26 25 66 12 51 3 66 6 56 4 66

Water pools up at Highway 7, 21st

Ave, and 4th St.

Replaced sewer line on

8/12/1991 at 235 20th Ave N.

Roots growing into pipes, not on city

property.

Issues in backyard of 229 21st Ave

N due to runoff uphill from

neighbors and causes erosion.

Repair by digging into boulevard

to allow Porma-Lining in 09-2010

at 35 20th Ave N.

Replaced street portion prior to

1999 at 42 20th Ave N.

Spring melt cause puddles at end

of driveway at 35 20th Ave N.

Tree by road causes problems at

140 and 142 20th Ave N.

254 19th Ave N experiencing leak at

end of sidewalk from curb stop.

Large ponds of snow melt and ice

at 46 20th Ave N.

Roots cause drain to clog at 113

18th Ave N.

201 19th Ave frozen water service

under street.

Pond overflowed damaging

driveway and retaining wall.Roots clog line at 146 20th Ave N.

Water pressure seems below

average, 231 20th Ave N.

Dip/uneven pavement along curb

at 117 19th Ave N that causes

people to trip when exiting

vehicles.

Sewer backup 3 times in 15

years.

Problems at 2nd St. and West Park

Rd. by the pond.

Service enters boulevard and has

problems freezing. Would like

better cover at 14 18th Ave N.

Problems at 2nd St. N and 18th

Ave N.

Roots need to be cleaned every 3-

5 years at 42 20th Ave N.

3rd St. and 21st Ave. front yard

floods from water running off of

road, curb would help.

Sewer backed up 3 times before

installing a valve to prevent it ,

200 18th Ave N.

On south side of 16 20th Ave N

driveway.

Sewer backup in 1990 and now

has tree roots cleaned annually.

142 18th Ave N standing water in

gutter.

Recent sewer backup at 144 19th

Ave N.

Large pool at driveway of 12 20th

Ave N.

Replaced connection March 2015

due to tree roots

Pooling water along 3rd St N.

Sidewalks Yes No Blank Sub-surface Irrigation/Fence Yes No Trees/Landscape Yes No Blank General

16 42 8 66 7 57 64 19 24 23 66

Yes along 4th St from Hwy 7 to 19th Ave on

park side.342 19th Ave N. fence

Tree at corner of 19th Ave and 4th

St causes sight problem for drivers

pulling onto 19th Ave.

Better access to bike trail from North end of

19th Ave. Curb and gutter on 4th St. Better

turn around at 19th Ave and 4th St.

Sidewalks on 19th Ave N.18605 Old Excelsior Blvd??

Fence

Two trees near street one is

moveable one is not at 342 19th

Ave N.

Sidewalk and lawn steps down to street,

where will they be taken, how will they be

replaced contact 952-933-3563 at 211 18th

Ave N.

Yes in front of 111 20th Ave N. 245 18th Ave N. irrigationNew mulch border around tree at

338 19th Ave N.

Wished to be contacted 612-889-4355 at

121 20th Ave N: how thick will pavement

be, when did city do overlay, and what is

city doing for prevention…???

Streetlights wished for on 300 block 19th

Ave.53 20th Ave N. irrigation

Fence and trees in front yard at 42

20th Ave N.

Fence at Smith Auto makes it hard to enter

20th Ave from alley.

Yes on 20th Ave N. 100 17th Ave N. irrigation Pine and Apple trees in front of 218

21st Ave N.Consider bikeway on 19th Ave N.

Yes on 1st St and 2nd St to connect

avenues.230 20th Ave N. irrigation.

Garden in side yard of 200 19th Ave

N.

Will property owners be assessed for new

street? 53 20th Ave N, 612-272-5319

7 addresses stated absolutely not or used

excessive exclamation points.1901 Mainstreet irrigation.

Three pines and one maple along

3rd St N at 301 18th Ave N.

How long will project take? 300 21st Ave,

952-939-0788

3 addresses in favor for safety reasons. Flower garden at 201 19th Ave N.2 adresses suggested a three way stop at

20th Ave N and 2nd St N.

On 1st St N from 20th Ave to 5th Ave.Retaining wall with plants at 120

20th Ave N.

No alley access for 105 18th Ave N, need to

maintain street access.

On 19th Ave N. from Mainstreet to 1st St. Can power lines be buried?

On 19th Ave N. from Mainstreet to 1st St.

Cottonwood tree at 4th and 19th blocks

views of drivers and pedestrians trying to

cross, consider removing. A sidewalk or trail

would increase safety for children and

strollers.

Appendix E: Neighborhood Meetings

Appendix F: Geotechnical Evaluation

Geotechnical Evaluation Report

2016 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectHopkins, Minnesota

Prepared for

City of Hopkins

Professional Certification:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.

Neil G. Lund, PESenior EngineerLicense Number: 46212August 17, 2015

Project B1504504

Braun Intertec Corporation

AA/EOE

Braun Intertec Corporation11001 Hampshire Avenue SMinneapolis, MN 55438

Phone: 952.995.2000Fax: 952.995.2020Web: braunintertec.com

August 17, 2015 Project B1504504

Mr. Mike WaltmanBolton & Menk, Inc.12224 Nicollet AvenueBurnsville, MN 55337-1649

Re: Geotechnical Evaluation2016 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectHopkins, Minnesota

Dear Mr. Waltman:

We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the 2016 Street Improvement Projectin Hopkins, Minnesota. Our results and recommendations in light of the geotechnical issues influencingdesign and construction are presented in the attached report, which we request that you read in itsentirety.

Remarks

Thank you for making Braun Intertec Corporation your geotechnical consultant for this project. If youhave questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of ourwork to date, please call Neil Lund at 952.995.2284.

Sincerely,

BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION

Heidi C. Olson, EITEngineer-in-Training

Neil G. Lund, PESenior Engineer

Table of Contents

Description Page

A. Introduction......................................................................................................................................1

A.1. Project Description..............................................................................................................1

A.2. Purpose................................................................................................................................1

A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents..........................................................1

A.4. Project Area Conditions.......................................................................................................1

A.5. Scope of Services.................................................................................................................2

B. Results ..............................................................................................................................................2

B.1. Exploration Logs ..................................................................................................................2

B.1.a. Log of Boring Sheets...............................................................................................2

B.1.b. Geologic Origins .....................................................................................................3

B.2. Geologic Profile ...................................................................................................................3

B.2.a. Pavement Materials ...............................................................................................3

B.2.b. Geologic Materials .................................................................................................4

B.2.c. Groundwater ..........................................................................................................5

B.3. Laboratory Test Results.......................................................................................................6

C. Basis for Recommendations.............................................................................................................6

C.1. Design Details ......................................................................................................................6

C.1.a. Traffic Loads ...........................................................................................................6

C.1.b. Anticipated Grade Changes....................................................................................7

C.1.c. Utility Depths..........................................................................................................7

C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information ........................................................7

C.2. Design and Construction Considerations ............................................................................7

C.2.a. Reuse of Materials..................................................................................................7

C.2.b. Pavements and Drainage .......................................................................................7

C.2.c. Utility Support ........................................................................................................8

D. Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................8

D.1. Pavements...........................................................................................................................8

D.1.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls.....................................................................8

D.1.b. Backfill and Material Compaction ..........................................................................9

D.1.c. Design Sections ......................................................................................................9

D.1.d. Materials and Compaction ...................................................................................10

D.2. Utilities ..............................................................................................................................10

D.2.a. Subgrades .............................................................................................................10

D.2.b. Excavation Side Slopes .........................................................................................11

D.2.c. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill................................................11

D.2.d. Excavation Dewatering.........................................................................................11

D.2.e. Corrosion Potential ..............................................................................................11

D.3. Construction Quality Control ............................................................................................12

Table of Contents (continued)

Description Page

D.3.a. Excavation Observations ......................................................................................12

D.3.b. Materials Testing..................................................................................................12

D.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll ..............................................................................12

D.3.d. Cold Weather Precautions ...................................................................................12

E. Procedures......................................................................................................................................12

E.1. Penetration Test Borings...................................................................................................12

E.2. Material Classification and Testing ...................................................................................13

E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification..........................................................................13

E.2.b. Laboratory Testing ...............................................................................................13

E.3. Groundwater Measurements............................................................................................13

F. Qualifications..................................................................................................................................13

F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions..................................................................................13

F.1.a. Material Strata .....................................................................................................13

F.1.b. Groundwater Levels .............................................................................................14

F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility..........................................................................14

F.2.a. Plan Review ..........................................................................................................14

F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ...............................................................14

F.3. Use of Report.....................................................................................................................14

F.4. Standard of Care................................................................................................................15

AppendixBoring Location SketchLog of Boring Sheets (ST-1 through ST-24)Descriptive Terminology

A. Introduction

A.1. Project Description

This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the proposed 2016 Street and Utility Improvement

Project in Hopkins, Minnesota. The total length of street reconstruction proposed for the project is about

8,400 linear feet and includes the following:

21st Avenue North, 2nd Street North to 4th Street North 4th Street North, 21st Avenue North to 19th Avenue North 20th Avenue North, Mainstreet to 3rd Street North (extension thereof) 18th Avenue North, Mainstreet to 3rd Street North 2nd Street North, 20th Avenue North to 17th Avenue North 3rd Street North, 18th Avenue North to 17th Avenue North 19th Avenue North, Mainstreet to 1st Street North

A.2. Purpose

The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation was to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at

selected exploration locations and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and

construction of the Hopkins 2016 Street and Utility Improvement Project.

A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents

To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed the following information or documents:

A base map of the project area provided by Bolton & Menk, Inc., Inc. Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County available from the Minnesota Geological Survey.

A.4. Project Area Conditions

Based on our referenced documents and past experience, the native soils underlying the project area

include a mix of glacial till and glacial outwash. Lacustrine (lakebed) and associated organic swamp

deposits may also be present locally.

City of HopkinsProject B1504504August 17, 2015Page 2

The streets in the 2016 Street and Utility Improvement Project area are residential, with bituminous

pavement and concrete curb and gutter. The topography is rolling; surface elevations generally decrease

from north to south.

A.5. Scope of Services

Our scope of services for this project was originally submitted as a Proposal to Mr. Mike Waltman of

Bolton & Menk, Inc., for which we received e-mail authorization to proceed on April 28, 2015. Tasks

performed in accordance with our authorized scope of services included:

Clearing exploration locations of underground utilities.

Performing penetration test borings (labeled ST-1 through ST-24) to between 15 feet belowthe existing street surfaces.

Performing laboratory moisture content tests and mechanical analyses (#200 sieve only) onselected penetration test samples.

Preparing this report containing a CAD sketch, exploration logs, a summary of the geologicmaterials encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for subgradepreparation, pavement thickness design and utility placement.

Exploration locations and surface elevations at the exploration locations were determined using GPS

technology that utilizes the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT’s) permanent GPS

Virtual Reference Network (VRN).

Our scope of services was performed under the terms of our September 1, 2013, General Conditions.

B. Results

B.1. Exploration Logs

B.1.a. Log of Boring Sheets

Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings are included in the Appendix. The logs identify and

describe the geologic materials that were penetrated, and present the results of penetration resistance

tests, laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples retrieved from them and groundwater

measurements.


Strata boundaries were inferred from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings.

Because sampling was not performed continuously, the strata boundary depths are only approximate.

The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may

also occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions.

B.1.b. Geologic Origins

Geologic origins assigned to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report were

based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual

classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface

exploration, (3) penetration resistance testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results and

(5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the

site and surrounding area in the past.

B.2. Geologic Profile

B.2.a. Pavement Materials

The borings first encountered an average bituminous pavement thickness of 4.7 inches as shown in Table

1. With the exception of Borings ST-1, ST-4 and ST-6, where a 12-inch aggregate base layer was noted

below the bituminous surface, most of the borings did not encounter a distinct aggregate base. Instead, a

variable depth layer of silty sand (SM) fill, often including gravel and sometimes intermixed with clayey

soils was present. This silty sand fill layer ranged in thickness from about 1-foot to 7 feet. Fill soils

classified as clayey sand (SC) appeared to directly underlay the bituminous surface in a limited number of

locations (ST-3, ST-14).

Table 1. Pavement Thickness Summary

Street # of borings

Average Pavement Thickness(in.)

Bituminous Aggregate Base

All 24 4.7 ---

2nd Street North 3 4.5 12*

3rd Street North 2 9.8 ---

4th Street North 2 4.3 ---

18th Avenue North 6 5.0 12**

19th Avenue North 2 3.9 ---

20th Avenue North 6 4.0 ---

21st Avenue North 3 4.7 ---

*One boring location; based on visual classification, similar to a thin layer of silty sand (SM) fill.**Two boring locations; based on visual classification, similar to a thin layer of silty sand (SM) fill.


B.2.b. Geologic Materials

Beneath the pavement layers, the general geologic profile of site (from the top down) most commonly

included:

The noted fill or possible fill soils (silty sand, clayey sand, sandy lean clay, lean clay with sand,mixed soils, sandy silt).

Glacial till (silty sand, clayey sand, lean clay).

Glacial outwash (poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand with silt, silty sand).

More limited deposits of the following were also present:

Alluvium (sandy silt, silty sand) in ST-30 and ST-44.

Lacustrine and swamp deposits (slightly organic lean clay, silt) in ST-23.

A complete summary of pavement material thicknesses and the classifications of underlying soils are

presented in Table 2. The soils are listed in the order in which they were encountered in the soil column,

separated by the subgrade zone (upper 5 feet) and the underlying strata.

Table 2. Pavement Thickness and Subgrade Soil Type Summary

Boring Street

Pavement Thicknesses(in.) Subsurface Soil Classification(s)

BituminousAggregate

Base0 -5 feet (pavement

subgrade) 5 – 15 feet

ST-1 2nd Street North 4 12 CL CL, SP

ST-2 3rd Street North 3 * SM SM

ST-3 3rd Street North 6 * SC, CL CL

ST-4 18th Avenue North 4 12 CL, SC SC

ST-5 18th Avenue North 4 * SM SM, SP

ST-6 18th Avenue North 4 12 SC SC, SP


ST-8 18th Avenue North 5 * SM, CL CL, SP

ST-9 18th Avenue North 4 1/2 * SM SM, SP

ST-10 2nd Street North 5 * SM SM, SP

ST-11 4th Street North 7 1/2 * SM, SC SC, SM

ST-12 2nd Street North 4 1/2 * SM, SP SP

ST-13 19th Avenue North 5 12 CL, SP SP

ST-14 19th Avenue North 5 * SC, CL CL, SP


ST-16 20th Avenue North 3 * SM SM, SC, SP


Boring Street

Pavement Thicknesses(in.) Subsurface Soil Classification(s)

BituminousAggregate

Base0 -5 feet (pavement

subgrade) 5 – 15 feet

ST-17 20th Avenue North 4 1/2 * SM, SP SP, SC

ST-18 20th Avenue North 4 1/2 * SM, SP-SM SP-SM, SP

ST-19 20th Avenue North 4 1/2 * CL, SP SP

ST-20 20th Avenue North 4 * CL, ML ML, SP

ST-21 4th Street North 12 * SM, CL CL, SC

ST-22 21st Avenue North 4 * SM, SC SC

ST-23 21st Avenue North 4 * SM SM, CL, ML

ST-24 21st Avenue North 4 * SM SM, SP, SC

*A distinct aggregate base layer was either not noted by the drillers or was noted as being difficult to distinguish from underlyingmaterials.

Penetration resistance data is summarized in Table 3, with comments to qualify the significance of

penetration test results.

Table 3. Penetration Resistance Data

Geologic Material

SoilClassification(s)

Represented

Range of PenetrationResistances

(BPF)* Comments

Fill (granular soils) SM 2 to 29 Mostly poorly compacted

Fill (non-granular soils)SC, Sandy CL,mixed SM/SC

3 to 16Highly variable; occasionally poorly

compacted

Glacial Till (clayey)SC; Sandy CL; CL

w/sand4 to 28

Rather soft to very stiff; generallymedium

Glacial Till (silty sand) SM 8 to 46 Loose to dense

Glacial Outwash (granular) SP, SP-SM, SM 2 to 40 Very loose to dense, generally loose

*BPF – blows per foot.

In several borings, the drillers noted instances where blow counts may have been influenced by possible

cobbles or coarse gravel at the tip of the sampler. The depth of these occurrences is noted in the

comments section of the boring logs.

B.2.c. Groundwater

Groundwater was not observed as our borings were advanced. Based on the moisture contents of the

geologic materials encountered, it appears that groundwater was below the depths explored at the time

of our fieldwork.


However, borings ST-23 and ST-24, adjacent to the lake, contained signs that groundwater has been

historically present such as gray soil coloration and silt lacustrine deposits. Additional time may have

been needed for the groundwater to rise to its hydrostatic level in the fine-grained silts and clays in this

area.

Seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater should also be anticipated.

B.3. Laboratory Test Results

Laboratory test results, including moisture content and mechanical analyses (#200 sieve only), are

summarized in Table 4. The moisture contents of the soils was around 4 to 24 percent, indicating the

various materials were likely near their optimum moisture contents for compaction. The slightly higher

moisture content in ST-23 (24 percent) is partially influenced by its minor organic soil content.

Table 4. Laboratory Testing

BoringDepth

(ft) Soil ClassificationMoisture Content

(%)Mechanical Analysis

(% Passing #200 Sieve)

ST-15 7 ½ SM 7 ---

ST-16 12 ½ SC 8 ---

ST-17 5 SP 4 ---

ST-18 7 ½ SP 4 ---

ST-19 10 SP 3 ---

ST-21 10 SC 15 32

ST-23 10 CL* 24 ---

*Organic content = 3%.

C. Basis for Recommendations

C.1. Design Details

C.1.a. Traffic Loads

The majority of streets of the 2016 Street Improvement Project are residential and no traffic count data

was available. We assume that these streets will experience a maximum of 50,000 Equivalent Single Axle

Loads (ESALs) over a 20-year design period.


C.1.b. Anticipated Grade Changes

Based on the nature of construction, we anticipate grade changes will be minimal.

C.1.c. Utility Depths

Design utility depths were not provided. Based on the maximum requested boring depths, we assume

the water main will generally be less than 10 feet below grade. We assume storm sewer improvements

will be approximately 5 feet below grade.

C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information

We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed construction to the extent it was

reported to us by others. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may have been

made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the

project details, we should be notified. New or changed information could require additional evaluation,

analyses and/or recommendations.

C.2. Design and Construction Considerations

C.2.a. Reuse of Materials

Our borings encountered a bituminous layer averaging slightly less than 5 inches thick and an aggregate

base, in a small number of borings, about 12 inches thick. Visually, the limited materials identified as

“aggregate base” in the field during drilling were often similar to those described as fill (usually dark

brown silty sand (SM) with gravel) and a consistent, readily identifiable support layer did not appear to

be present.

Based on the available information, it is our opinion that full-depth reclamation (FDR) will be difficult to

perform in a way that will provide a consistent, quality product for reuse in new pavements as aggregate

base. Coupled with the need to remove or stockpile these materials in order to maintain grades and

perform utility excavations, FDR may also prove to be relatively costly.

If the bituminous surface millings can be stockpiled near the site for direct reuse on the project then

some cost savings may be realized. To meet the recommend pavement section thickness, the millings will

have to be combined (blended) or supplemented with additional imported materials.

C.2.b. Pavements and Drainage

The pavement subgrades (top 5 feet below the pavement surface) will consist of a wide variety of soils

including lean clays with varying sand content, silty sand, clayey sand, poorly graded sand with silt and


poorly graded sand. We anticipate the majority of the subgrade soils present beneath the existing roads

will generally be suitable for pavement support in their current condition or with minor rework such as

surface compaction. Soils with higher fine contents such as the clayey sands, sandy lean clays and lean

clays with sand may require additional work, such as drying or moisture conditioning, if wet or allowed to

become wet during excavation work.

To improve pavement drainage and uniformity, we recommend considering the installation of a subbase,

consisting of MnDOT Select Granular, beneath the aggregate base section. We further recommend

placing drain tile about catch basins and at low points behind curb in order to facilitate drainage of the

roadways. The drain tile should be trenched at least 8 inches below the aggregate base or subbase,

wrapped in filter fabric and backfilled with highly permeable aggregate.

C.2.c. Utility Support

The reuse of the utility trench backfill soils will have potential impacts on the pavement subgrades. If the

backfill is not properly compacted, there is the potential for subgrade instability and settlement (and

premature deterioration) of the pavement surface. We anticipate that most of the trench soils will

consist of granular outwash soils (poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt), though a number

of borings also encountered clayey and silty soils at depth. On the west side of the project (ST-23), silt

and other potentially unstable soils were present.

Depending on the conditions at the time of excavation, watering or drying (moisture conditioning) of the

clayey and silty soils may be necessary to achieve the levels of compaction recommended for utility

support. Clayey and particularly silt-rich trench soils that are exposed to moisture will be more

susceptible to strength loss and may also become unstable, which will require moisture conditioning or

removal and replacement with suitable soils. This may be of particular concern in the area near Boring

ST-23.

D. Recommendations

D.1. Pavements

D.1.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls

For preparation of any exposed subgrades prior to placement of new pavement sections or reclaimed

aggregate (see below), we recommend the subgrade soils be proofrolled with a loaded tandem-axle truck

and observed by a geotechnical engineer and City personnel. This will assist in identifying any soft or


weak areas that will require additional soil correction work. Areas that yield or rut more than 2 inches

due to wheel traffic should be corrected. Failed areas should be compacted, or if too wet, we

recommend that the upper 1 to 2 feet of the resulting subgrade be scarified, dried to a moisture content

not more than 1 percentage point above optimum, and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its

standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698).

If there are areas that still cannot be compacted, we recommend the unstable materials be subexcavated

to a minimum depth of 1 to 2 feet (depending on the replacement material) and be replaced with

suitable materials and compacted as specified for the fill. Depending on the depth of subcut and

underlying material, suitable subcut backfill material may consist of MnDOT Select Granular Borrow,

aggregate base or larger diameter crushed aggregate (“3-inch minus”). We should be consulted regarding

subcut depths and backfill material.

D.1.b. Backfill and Material Compaction

We recommend compacting soils used as backfill for subcuts or material replacement be compacted to a

minimum of 100 percent of standard Proctor density within 3 feet of the top of the subgrade. For fills

more than 3 feet below final subgrades, 95 percent compaction is sufficient. The moisture content of the

fill and backfill should be as shown in the table below depending on the classification of the backfill soils.

Our compaction requirements are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5. Compaction Recommendations Summary

ReferenceRelative Compaction, percent

(ASTM D 698 – Standard Proctor)Moisture Content Variance from

Optimum, percentage Points

Below pavements, within 3 feet ofsubgrade elevations

100-3/+3 (sandy soils)

-2/+1 (clayey soils)

Below pavements, more than 3 feetbelow subgrade elevations

Below utilities

95-3/+3 (sandy soils)

-2/+3 (clayey soils)

D.1.c. Design Sections

Laboratory tests to determine an R-value for pavement design were not included in the scope of this

project. Given the most common soils in the top 5 feet of pavement sections, which include clayey sand,

silty sand and sandy lean clay, among others, we recommend using an R-value of 20 for pavement

thickness design of the overall project. In our opinion, due to the variability of the subgrade soils, this R-

value is a reasonable value to apply on a block-by-block basis. Further testing or refinement of the R-

value used for design is possible and can be provided upon request.


Based upon the assumed traffic loads and an R-value of 20, we recommend a new pavement section for

the streets in the 2016 Street Reconstruction meet the minimum thicknesses presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Thickness Design for Residential Streets

LayerThickness

(in.) MnDOT Specification/Designation

Bituminous Wear 1 1/2 (1 lift) SPWEB240C

Bituminous Non-wear 2 (1 lift) SPNWB230C

Aggregate Base (Class 5 or 6) 9* 3138

(OPTIONAL)

Select Granular Subbase12 3149.2B2

*The aggregate base thickness can be reduced to 6 inches if the subbase is utilized.

The above pavement designs are based upon a 20-year performance life. This is the amount of time

before major reconstruction is anticipated. This performance life assumes maintenance such as seal

coating and crack sealing is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary depending on

variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance.

D.1.d. Materials and Compaction

We recommend specifying pavement materials as recommended in Table 6.

We recommend compacting the aggregate base to meet the requirements of MnDOT specification

2211.3.D.2.c. (Penetration Index Method). We recommend compacting bituminous pavements to at least

92 percent of the maximum theoretical Rice density per the Maximum Density Method (specification

2360.3.D.1).

D.2. Utilities

D.2.a. Subgrades

The native and fill soils encountered at likely utility elevations generally appear suitable for pipe and

utility structure support and we anticipate that utilities can be installed per manufacturer bedding

requirements. However, we encountered somewhat wet, clayey or silty soils at likely utility depths in

several borings, particularly on the west side of the project. The soils in ST-23, in particular, which

included slightly organic lean clay and lacustrine silt between 6 1/2 and 16 feet below the road surface,

should be removed and replaced with suitable grading materials if unstable.


We recommend providing a contingency for some subcutting and replacement of these materials as part

of construction. In the event that unstable or organic soils are encountered at pipe elevations, they

should be subcut and replaced with crushed-faced rock that is free of material 1 inch in diameter or

smaller).

We recommend a geotechnical engineer observe all utility trench excavations and subcuts.

D.2.b. Excavation Side Slopes

The project area soils appear to meet OSHA Type A, B and C requirements. We then recommend

constructing excavation side slopes to lie back at a horizontal to vertical slope of 1 1/2 to 1 or flatter.

All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations

and Trenches.” This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor.

Reference to these OSHA requirements should be included in the project specifications.

D.2.c. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill

We recommend compacting backfill placed above and below utilities to a minimum of 95 percent of

standard Proctor density. The exception is within 3 feet vertically of pavement subgrades, where the

minimum compaction level should be increased to 100 percent. The fill should be within 3 percentage

points of its optimum moisture content for sands; clays should only exceed their optimum moisture

contents by 1 percent.

To achieve compaction over wet or waterbearing subgrades, we recommend the use of sands or gravel

with less than 5 percent by weight passing the number 200 sieve and less than 50 percent passing the

number 40 sieve.

D.2.d. Excavation Dewatering

We recommend removing groundwater from the utility excavations if encountered, and removing any

water that seeps into excavations from sidewalls or the adjacent sitework. Sumps and pumps will

generally be suitable for short-term water removal under the soil conditions likely to be encountered for

this project. Alternative approaches should be considered for long-term or large-scale groundwater

removal.

D.2.e. Corrosion Potential

Based on the typically sandy soils encountered at utility depths, corrosion protection should not be

required for ductile iron pipe. Type I cement may also be specified for concrete utilities.


D.3. Construction Quality Control

D.3.a. Excavation Observations

We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparation,

utility placement and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the

competence of the geologic materials exposed in the excavations and the adequacy of required

excavation oversizing.

D.3.b. Materials Testing

We recommend density tests be taken in excavation backfill and additional required fill placed below

pavements and utilities.

We recommend Gyratory tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids and density tests

to evaluate compaction.

D.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll

We recommend that proofrolling of the pavement subgrades be observed by a geotechnical engineer to

determine if the results of the procedure meet project specifications and to delineate the extent of

additional pavement subgrade preparation work that may be necessary.

D.3.d. Cold Weather Precautions

If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed

from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on frozen subgrades. No frozen

soils should be used as fill.

Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM C 94. Concrete

should not be placed on frozen subgrades. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the

necessary strength is attained.

E. Procedures

E.1. Penetration Test Borings

The penetration test borings were drilled with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with

hollow-stem auger. The borings were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586.


Penetration test samples were taken at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals. Actual sample intervals and

corresponding depths are shown on the boring logs.

E.2. Material Classification and Testing

E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification

The geologic materials encountered were visually and manually classified in accordance with ASTM

Standard Practice D 2488. A chart explaining the classification system is attached. Samples were placed in

jars or bags and returned to our facility for review and storage.

E.2.b. Laboratory Testing

The results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples are noted on or follow the

appropriate attached exploration logs. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM or AASHTO

procedures.

E.3. Groundwater Measurements

The drillers checked for groundwater as the penetration test borings were advanced, and again after

auger withdrawal. The boreholes were then backfilled as noted on the boring logs.

F. Qualifications

F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions

F.1.a. Material Strata

Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations were developed from a limited amount of site and

subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from

exploration locations continuously with depth, and therefore strata boundaries and thicknesses must be

inferred to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and can be expected to vary

in depth, elevation and thickness away from the exploration locations.


Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until

additional exploration work is completed, or construction commences. If any such variations are

revealed, our recommendations should be re-evaluated. Such variations could increase construction

costs, and a contingency should be provided to accommodate them.

F.1.b. Groundwater Levels

Groundwater measurements were made under the conditions reported herein and shown on the

exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. It should be noted that the observation

periods were relatively short, and groundwater can be expected to fluctuate in response to rainfall,

flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal

and annual factors.

F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility

F.2.a. Plan Review

This report is based on a limited amount of information, and a number of assumptions were necessary to

help us develop our recommendations. It is recommended that our firm review the geotechnical aspects

of the designs and specifications, and evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes

have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly

interpreted and implemented in the designs and specifications.

F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing

It is recommended that we be retained to perform observations and tests during construction. This will

allow correlation of the subsurface conditions encountered during construction with those encountered

by the borings, and provide continuity of professional responsibility.

F.3. Use of Report

This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written

approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses

and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects.


F.4. Standard of Care

In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under

similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No

warranty, express or implied, is made.

Appendix

4T

HS

TR

EE

TN

O.

3R

DS

TR

EE

TN

O.

2N

DS

TR

EE

TN

O.

1S

TS

TR

EE

TN

O.

MA

INS

TR

EE

T

21ST AVENUE NO.

20TH AVENUE NO.

19TH AVENUE NO.

18TH AVENUE NO.

17TH AVENUE NO.

Sheet:

of

Fig:

Project No:

B1504504

Drawn By:

Date Drawn:

Checked By:

Last Modified: 7/10/15

Scale:

F:\

20

15

\B1

50

45

04

.dw

g,G

eo

tech,7

/10

/20

15

10

:06

:22

AM

Drawing No:

Base Dwg Provided By:

FAX (952) 995-2020PH. (952) 995-2000

Minneapolis, MN 5543811001 Hampshire Avenue S

SO

ILB

OR

ING

LO

CA

TIO

NS

KE

TC

HG

EO

TE

CH

NIC

AL

EV

ALU

AT

ION

2016

ST

RE

ET

AN

DU

TIL

ITY

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

SH

OP

KIN

SS

TR

EE

TA

ND

UT

ILIT

YIM

PR

OV

EM

EN

TS

HO

PK

INS

,M

INN

ES

OT

A

B1504504

1" = 200'

REJ

5/27/15

NL

0

SCALE: 1" = 200'

200'100'

NDENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING

3

9

13

21

21

25

7120

4 inches of bituminous over 12 inches of aggregatebase.

FILL: Lean Clay with Sand, dark brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,light brown, moist, medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

With Gravel at 15 feet.

END OF BORING.

Water not observed to cave-in depth of 5 feetimmediately after withdrawal of auger.

Boring then backfilled.

PAV

FILL

SP

No recovery insampler.

No recovery insampler.

935.1

929.9

920.4

1.3

6.5

16.0

LOCATION: See attached sketch.

ST-1

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:

Description of Materials(ASTM D2488 or D2487)

ST-1 page 1 of 1

3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerK. Keck

BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL

L O G O F B O R I N G

BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)

Braun Intertec CorporationB1504504

LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45

Braun Project B1504504GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION2016 Street and Utility ImprovementsHopkins, Minnesota

P200%

MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet936.4

Depthfeet

0.0

29

20

12

15

18

46

7

3 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Graveland Clayey inclusions, brown, moist.

SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel,reddish brown, moist, medium dense to dense.

(Glacial Till)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SM

Rock at sampler tip.

944.6

938.3

928.8

0.3

6.5

16.0


ST-2

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-2 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:46


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet944.8

Depthfeet

0.0

3

11

4

4

5

34

26

6 inches of bituminous.FILL: Clayey Sand, dark brown and gray, wet.

LEAN CLAY, light brown and gray, moist, rather soft torather stiff.

(Glacial Till)

SILTY SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,reddish brown, moist, dense.

(Glacial Till)END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

CL

SM


951.1

947.6

936.6

935.6

0.5

4.0

15.0

16.0


ST-3

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-3 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:47


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet951.6

Depthfeet

0.0

6

6

7

15

16

24

3514


FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, dark brown, moist.

CLAYEY SAND, brown, moist, medium to very stiff.(Glacial Till)

END OF BORING.

Water not observed to cave-in depth of 11 1/2 feetimmediately after withdrawal of auger.


PAV

FILL

SC

945.8

943.1

931.1

1.3

4.0

16.0


ST-4

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-4 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:47


P200%

MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet947.1

Depthfeet

0.0

4

2

7

13

26

21

9

4 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel,dark brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine-grained, light brown tobrown, wet, loose to medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

939.5

932.9

923.9

0.3

7.0

16.0


ST-5

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-5 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:47


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet939.9

Depthfeet

0.0

8

3

4

4

13

16

7


FILL: Clayey Sand, with Gravel, brown to dark brown,moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,brown, wet, very loose to medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAV

FILL

SP

932.6

927.4

917.9

1.3

6.5

16.0


ST-6

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-6 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:47


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet933.9

Depthfeet

0.0

5

3

18

12

14

19

4 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel,brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

931.7

925.0

916.0

0.3

7.0

16.0


ST-7

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-7 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:47


ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet932.0

Depthfeet

0.0

6

5

9

18

19

21

5 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, dark brown,moist.

FILL: Lean Clay with Sand, brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, light brown, wet, loose to medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

FILL

SP

Rock at sampler tip. No recovery.

928.4

924.8

922.3

912.8

0.4

4.0

6.5

16.0


ST-8

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-8 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:47


ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet928.8

Depthfeet

0.0

6

8

6

11

18

23

4

4 1/2 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,dark brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown, wet, loose to medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

933.3

926.7

917.7

0.4

7.0

16.0


ST-9

6/16/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-9 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:47


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet933.7

Depthfeet

0.0

15

5

2

2

6

8

9

5 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,dark brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown, wet, very loose to loose.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

935.4

926.8

919.8

0.4

9.0

16.0


ST-10

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-10 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet935.8

Depthfeet

0.0

32

13

2

2

8

10

7 1/2 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,dark brown, moist.

FILL: Clayey Sand, with Gravel, brown to reddishbrown, moist.

SILTY SAND, reddish brown, wet, loose.(Glacial Till)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

FILL

SM

943.0

939.7

931.7

927.7

0.7

4.0

12.0

16.0


ST-11

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-11 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet943.7

Depthfeet

0.0

13

12

24

40

28

16

10

4 1/2 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,light brown to brown, moist.POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown, moist to wet, medium dense todense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

Rock at sampler tip.No recovery.

939.2

938.1

923.6

0.4

1.5

16.0


ST-12

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-12 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet939.6

Depthfeet

0.0

3

3

7

7

3

4

25


FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, black, moist to wet.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown to dark brown, wet, very loose toloose.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAV

FILL

SP

930.8

928.2

916.2

1.4

4.0

16.0


ST-13

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-13 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet932.2

Depthfeet

0.0

6

6

6

7

10

18

7619

5 inches of bituminous.FILL: Clayey Sand, dark brown to brown, moist to wet.

FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, brown, wet.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

FILL

SP

933.0

929.4

926.9

917.4

0.4

4.0

6.5

16.0


ST-14

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-14 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


P200%

MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet933.4

Depthfeet

0.0

11

16

14

10

9

10

7

3 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel,brown, moist.FILL: Silty Sand, with Gravel, reddish brown, moist,medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained,with Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SM

SP

975.8

974.5

967.0

960.0

0.3

1.5

9.0

16.0


ST-15

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-15 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet976.0

Depthfeet

0.0

5

15

15

16

17

11

8

3 inches of bituminous.SILTY SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, brown, moist,loose to medium dense.

(Glacial Till)

CLAYEY SAND, brown, wet, stiff to very stiff.(Glacial Till)

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine-grained, brown, moist,medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVSM

SC

SP


964.1

957.8

950.3

948.3

0.3

6.5

14.0

16.0


ST-16

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-16 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet964.3

Depthfeet

0.0

9

19

33

28

29

27

4

4 1/2 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,dark brown to brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,brown, moist to wet, medium dense to dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

CLAYEY SAND, brown, moist, very stiff.(Glacial Till)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

SC

Rock at sampler tip.No recovery.

947.8

944.2

934.2

932.2

0.4

4.0

14.0

16.0


ST-17

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-17 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet948.2

Depthfeet

0.0

5

7

24

21

25

28

4

4 1/2 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,brown to dark brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,brown to reddish brown, moist to wet, medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP


934.8

928.7

919.2

0.4

6.5

16.0


ST-18

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-18 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:45


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet935.2

Depthfeet

0.0

4

11

16

17

19

18

3

4 1/2 inches of bituminous.FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, dark brown and black, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

931.2

927.7

915.7

0.4

4.0

16.0


ST-19

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-19 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:46


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet931.7

Depthfeet

0.0

4

6

8

5

6

12

4 inches of bituminous.FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, with bituminous aggregatepieces, dark brown to black, moist.

FILL: Sandy Silt, brown, moist.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,with Gravel, brown, moist to wet, loose to mediumdense.

(Glacial Outwash)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

FILL

SP

932.7

929.0

926.5

917.0

0.3

4.0

6.5

16.0


ST-20

6/15/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-20 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:46


ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet933.0

Depthfeet

0.0

16

9

7

12

21

18

3215

12 inches of bituminous.

FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel,brown, moist.FILL: Lean Clay with Sand, dark gray, moist.

LEAN CLAY, brown to gray, wet, medium to rather stiff.(Glacial Till)

CLAYEY SAND, brown, moist, medium dense.(Glacial Till)

END OF BORING.



PAV

FILL

FILL

CL

SC

937.3

936.3

934.3

929.3

922.3

1.0

2.0

4.0

9.0

16.0


ST-21

6/12/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-21 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:46


P200%

MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet938.3

Depthfeet

0.0

13

8

11

8

7

23

4 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, Clayey Sand mix, fine- tocoarse-grained, with Gravel, brown to dark brown,moist.

CLAYEY SAND, brown to reddish brown, moist to wet,medium to very stiff.

(Glacial Till)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SC

940.3

936.7

924.7

0.3

4.0

16.0


ST-22

6/12/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-22 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:46


ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet940.7

Depthfeet

0.0

5

5

5

8

16

12

24

4 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravelincluding bituminous pieces, some Clayey Sand, darkbrown, moist.

FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, dark gray, wet.

LEAN CLAY, slightly organic, black, wet.(Swamp Deposit)

SILT, gray, moist, stiff.(Lacustrine Deposit)

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

FILL

CL

ML

OC=3%

953.7

947.5

945.0

942.5

938.0

0.3

6.5

9.0

11.5

16.0


ST-23

6/12/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-23 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:46


MC%

ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet954.0

Depthfeet

0.0

12

14

10

5

28

18

4 inches of bituminous.FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, trace Gravel,dark brown to reddish brown, moist to wet.

POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained,brown, moist, loose.

(Glacial Outwash)

CLAYEY SAND, brown, wet, rather stiff to very stiff.(Glacial Till)

Gray at 15 feet.

END OF BORING.



PAVFILL

SP

SC


930.3

923.6

921.6

914.6

0.3

7.0

9.0

16.0


ST-24

6/12/15 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD:


ST-24 page 1 of 1


BORING:

SCALE:DRILLER:

Tests or NotesWL


BPF

(See

Des

crip

tive

Ter

min

olog

y sh

eet f

or e

xpla

natio

n of

abb

revi

atio

ns)


LOG

OF

BORI

NG

-DRA

FT N

:\G

INT\

PRO

JECT

S\AX

PRO

JECT

S\20

15\0

4504

.GPJ

BRA

UN

_V8_

CURR

ENT.

GD

T 8

/17/

15 1

5:46


ASTMSymbol

Elev.feet930.6

Depthfeet

0.0

Descriptive Terminology of SoilStandard D 2487 - 00Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes(Unified Soil Classification System)

Rev. 7/07

DD Dry density, pcfWD Wet density, pcfMC Natural moisture content, %LL Liqiuid limit, %PL Plastic limit, %PI Plasticity index, %P200 % passing 200 sieve

OC Organic content, %S Percent of saturation, %SG Specific gravityC Cohesion, psf

Angle of internal frictionqu Unconfined compressive strength, psfqp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf

Liquid Limit (LL)

Laboratory Tests

Plas

ticity

Inde

x (P

I)

Drilling Notes

Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3 1/4” or 6 1/4”ID hollow-stem augers unless noted otherwise, Jetting water was usedto clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs.Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix “ST”(Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2” OD split-tubesampler, except where noted.

Power auger borings were advanced by 4” or 6” diameter continuous-flight, solid-stem augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were in-ferred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore,somewhat approximate. Power auger borings are designated by theprefix “B.”

Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1 1/2” or 3 1/4”diameter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger couldbe manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are indicated by the prefix“H.”

BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetrationtest, also known as “N” value. The sampler was set 6” into undisturbedsoil below the hollow-stem auger. Driving resistances were then countedfor second and third 6” increments and added to get BPF. Where theydiffered significantly, they are reported in the following form: 2/12 for thesecond and third 6” increments, respectively.

WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammerand rods alone; driving not required.

WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rodsalone; hammer weight and driving not required.

TW indicates thin-walled (undisturbed) tube sample.

Note: All tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTMstandards.

Particle Size IdentificationBoulders ............................... over 12”Cobbles ............................... 3” to 12”Gravel

Coarse ............................ 3/4” to 3”Fine ................................. No. 4 to 3/4”

SandCoarse ............................ No. 4 to No. 10Medium ........................... No. 10 to No. 40Fine ................................. No. 40 to No. 200

Silt ....................................... No. 200, PI 4 or below “A” line

Clay ..................................... No. 200, PI 4 and on or above “A” line

Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils

Very loose ................................ 0 to 4 BPFLoose ....................................... 5 to 10 BPFMedium dense ......................... 11 to 30 BPFDense ...................................... 31 to 50 BPFVery dense ............................... over 50 BPF

Consistency of Cohesive SoilsVery soft ................................... 0 to 1 BPFSoft ....................................... 2 to 3 BPFRather soft ............................... 4 to 5 BPFMedium .................................... 6 to 8 BPFRather stiff ............................... 9 to 12 BPFStiff ....................................... 13 to 16 BPFVery stiff ................................... 17 to 30 BPFHard ....................................... over 30 BPF

a. Based on the material passing the 3-in (75mm) sieve.b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders or both” to group name.c. Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = (D30)

2

D10 x D60

d. If soil contains 15% sand, add “with sand” to group name.e. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:

GW-GM well-graded gravel with siltGW-GC well-graded gravel with clayGP-GM poorly graded gravel with siltGP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay

f. If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM or SC-SM.g. If fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name.h. If soil contains 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name.i. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:

SW-SM well-graded sand with siltSW-SC well-graded sand with claySP-SM poorly graded sand with siltSP-SC poorly graded sand with clay

j. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay.k. If soil contains 10 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or “with gravel” whichever is predominant.l. If soil contains 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name.m. If soil contains 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name.n. PI 4 and plots on or above “A” line.o. PI 4 or plots below “A” line.p. PI plots on or above “A” line.q. PI plots below “A” line.

Poorly graded sand h

Peat

Well-graded gravel d

PI plots on or above “A” line

PI 7 and plots on or above “A” line j

PI 4 or plots below “A” line j

Fine

-gra

ined

Soi

ls50

% o

r mor

e pa

ssed

the

No.

200

sie

ve

Coa

rse-

grai

ned

Soils

mor

e th

an 5

0% re

tain

ed o

nN

o. 2

00 s

ieve

Soils Classification

GravelsMore than 50% of

coarse fractionretained onNo. 4 sieve

Sands50% or more ofcoarse fraction

passesNo. 4 sieve

Silts and ClaysLiquid limit

less than 50

Highly Organic Soils

Silts and claysLiquid limit50 or more

Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor

GroupSymbol

Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols andGroup Names Using Laboratory Tests a

Group Name b

GW

GPGMGCSWSPSM

CLMLOLOL

SC

Poorly graded gravel d

Silty gravel d f g

Clean Gravels5% or less fines e

Gravels with FinesMore than 12% fines e

Clean Sands5% or less fines i

Sands with FinesMore than 12% i

Fines classify as ML or MHFines classify as CL or CH Clayey gravel d f g

Well-graded sand h

Fines classify as CL or CHFines classify as ML or MH Silty sand f g h

Clayey sand f g h

Inorganic

Organic Liquid limit - oven driedLiquid limit - not dried

0.75

Inorganic

Organic

PI plots below “A” line

Lean clay k l m

Liquid limit - oven driedLiquid limit - not dried

0.75

CHMH

OHOH

Fat clay k l m

Elastic silt k l m

Organic clay k l m n

Organic silt k l m o

Organic clay k l m p

Organic silt k l m q

Cu 6 and 1 Cc 3 C

PT

Cu 4 and 1 Cc 3 C

Cu 4 and/or 1 Cc 3 C

Cu 6 and/or 1 CC 3 C

0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

7

“U” L

ine

“A” Line

10

20

30

40

50

60

4 0

ML or OL

MH or OHCL or O

L

CH or O

H

CL - ML

Silt k l m

Services Provided:

Civil and Municipal Engineering

Water and Wastewater Engineering

Traffic and Transportation Engineering

Aviation Planning and Engineering

Water Resources Engineering

Coatings Inspection Services

Landscape Architecture Services

Surveying and Mapping

Geographic Information System Services

Funding Assistance

www.bolton-menk.com