11
POPs – UNEP and the GEF POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

POPs – UNEP and the GEFPOPs – UNEP and the GEF

Jim Willis, Director

UNEP Chemicals

Page 2: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Over 140 countries participate in Over 140 countries participate in UNEP GEF Project ActivitiesUNEP GEF Project Activities

Project JurisdictionProject Jurisdiction # of Activities# of Activities

Single countrySingle country 103103RegionalRegional 78 78Multi-countryMulti-country 20 20GlobalGlobal 31 31TotalTotal 232232

Page 3: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

• Regionally-based Assessment of Persistent Toxic Substances

Development of NIPs for POPs: 12-country pilot project Support for Implementation of the Stockholm Convention

(Medium size project) Persistent toxic substances, food security, and Indigenous

Peoples in Arctic Russia (Medium size project) Demonstration of alternatives to DDT in Mexico and

Central America (PDF-B) Reducing pesticides runoff to the Caribbean Sea

(Colombia, Costa Rica, Nicaragua) (PDF-B)

UNEP/GEF POPs and PTS Projects (1)UNEP/GEF POPs and PTS Projects (1)

Page 4: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

UNEP/GEF POPs and PTS Projects (2)UNEP/GEF POPs and PTS Projects (2)

Reduction of exposure to DDT and strengthening of malaria control - Executed by WHO/AFRO and Ministries of Health in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Madagascar, Namibia, South Africa, and Swaziland (PDF-B)

Support to local communities for the reduction of pesticides use in the Niger and Senegal River basins through Integrated Pest and Production Management - Executed by FAO/Global IPM Facility in Benin, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Senegal (PDF-B)

Page 5: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Some ConsiderationsSome Considerations

The NIP is your plan for implementing the convention; make sure that the plan is designed to meet your needs.

Different approaches in developing the plan:– Large external consultant component– Country-driven

EAs get a flat fee of ~$50,000 not included in the project budget. Budgets are country-specific; $500,000 is not automatic. Different EAs have different strengths and weaknesses.

Compare offers of assistance carefully. Partnerships are possible, but should be specified in your

proposal.

Page 6: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Why Consider UNEP? (1)Why Consider UNEP? (1)

UNEP is the secretariat of the Stockholm Convention and is designated by the Convention to assist parties.  

With UNEP supporting its NIP, the entire amount of GEF funding goes to that country.

UNEP has more than $6 million USD, in addition to what is available through the GEF, for projects and workshops in countries that develop their implementation plans with UNEP’s support.

Page 7: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Why Consider UNEP? (2)Why Consider UNEP? (2)

UNEP has extensive experience in all of the twelve POPs listed in the Stockholm Convention; an active POPs programme since 1995.

Governments selected UNEP to convene and support the negotiations of the Convention on the basis of its policy and technical competence on POPs.

UNEP seconded a staff member to write the “Initial guidelines for enabling activities for the POPs Convention” and is the agency most familiar with its requirements.

Page 8: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Why Consider UNEP? (3)Why Consider UNEP? (3)

UNEP is preparing the detailed guidelines for developing NIPs.

UNEP is preparing a CD with all POPs relevant documentation to support NIPs preparation

UNEP has developed all of the currently available UN guidelines and guidance materials specific to POPs.

UNEP has 40 staff members ready to provide immediate assistance to countries on NIPs.

UNEP has financed and provided technical support for over 60 national projects in developing countries and countries with economies in transition on the major issues addressed by the Stockholm Convention.

Page 9: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Why Consider UNEP? (4)Why Consider UNEP? (4)

Since 1995, UNEP has held over 100 regional, sub-regional and national workshops addressing POPs and the priority issues that are reflected in the Stockholm Convention.

UNEP implements 20-30 regional and sub-regional workshops each year on the Stockholm Convention. These address the key issues of implementation, including PCB and dioxin/furan inventories and action plans, and selecting alternatives to POPs pesticides. Where possible, these will be held in countries selecting UNEP to support their NIP in order to strengthen the plan development process and to build synergies.

Page 10: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Why Consider UNEP? (5)Why Consider UNEP? (5) UNEP has extensive experience in implementing GEF

projects. UNEP is a founding member of the GEF, and has been an Implementing Agency since the GEF’s inception in 1991.

UNEP was the first agency with POPs projects approved by the GEF.

UNEP’s underlying interest is to ensure that each country has the ability to fulfil its obligations under the Stockholm Convention and thereby to protect health and the environment from POPs. UNEP’s approach is designed to ensure that projects are country-driven, country-led and country-implemented.

Page 11: POPs – UNEP and the GEF Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals

Follow-upFollow-up

UNEP would be pleased to arrange follow-up consultations with countries to:– Provide in depth briefings on the Convention

and its requirements– Develop proposals for NIPs for GEF funding– Design other needed actions (e.g., workshops or

projects) for chemical safety

Can take place at UNEP or in your country