Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
8/14/15Daro Mott and Edward BlayneyLouisville Metro Government
Benchmarking ResearchA survey of Performance Management & Measurement (PM&M) programs
Table of Contents
1. About the research
2. General characteristics• Participants : Map
• Name of Group: Word Cloud
• Mission of the Group: Word Cloud
• Funding and Staffing: Descriptive Statistics
• CitiStat: Pie Chart
• General Characteristic Insights
3. PM&M activities, skills, and benefits• What leaders are saying…
• Most Important Organizational Factors: Bubble Chart
• Major Program Components: Rose Chart
• Change Management Efforts: Bar Chart
• Skills: Bar Chart
• Program Benefits: Bubble Chart
4. Conclusion
• Takeaways2
About the Research
• This research was compiled during 2014 and 2015 in order to better understand what local governments were doing in the area of Performance Measurement and Management (PM&M).
• The researched targeted with established or dedicated performance management offices or programs.
• The responses reflected in the following visualizations represent the notes taken during phone interviews conducted over the last two years.
• In some cases, the answers of the participants represent estimates or general patterns rather than exact figures. We intended to get a general understanding of what governments across the country were doing in PM&M and not to try to exactly pin down activities, costs, or benefits.
• We trust the interviewees and honor their responses as honest efforts to convey their programs, their activities, and benefits to their organizations. We hope that you find this document as a benefit to your program and appreciate your commitment of time and energy to look it over.
• Please reach out to [email protected] or [email protected] for further information.
3
General Characteristics
4
Edmonton, Canada
Participants (20)- Austin- Atlanta- Chicago- Cincinnati- Denver- Edmonton, CA- Ft. Lauderdale- Ft. Worth- Houston- King County, WA- Kansas City
- Louisville- Memphis- Miami-Dade- New Orleans- Philadelphia- San Diego- Tacoma- Tulsa- Washington, DC
Survey Participants
6
What is the name of your group?
Source:http://www.wordle.net
What is the mission of your group?
7
Source:http://www.wordle.net
How many people work in your office? What is your level of funding?
8
Staffing (FTE) Funding (USD)Average 5.0 677,411.76$ Median 5 630,000.00$ Mode 2 400,000.00$
NOTE: Some programs were excluded from the funding statistics because they were unable to provide estimates for their funding levels.
Is your performance management program modeled after CitiStat?
9
Yes50%
No50%
General Characteristics Insights
If someone were to randomly select one of the cities participating in this study, they would most likely see a program that looks like the following:
THE AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Name:Office of Performance Management
Mission:“Improve performance and efficiency of city services”
Staff: 5 FTE
Funding: $630,000
CitiStat: The program was influenced by CitiStat, if not directly modeled after it.
10
PM&M activities, skills, and benefits
11
What leaders of PM&M programs are saying…
• A PM&M program needs strong support from the top and a culture receptive to data in order to be successful.
• PM&M programs tend to focus on developing and coaching internal customers rather than strictly doing data analysis or metric development for them.
• PM&M programs most often use data analysis, strategic planning, and process improvement to change the way their organizations operate
12
What leaders of PM&M programs are saying… (Cont.)
• They highly value their team members’ ability to manage relationships with stakeholders and problem solve.
• Their programs have changed their organization’s culture concerning data and have brought significant process improvements to their service delivery.
13
What do you think are the most important factors in implementing and operationalizing the PM&M System/Program?
14
Source:http://raw.densitydesign.org/
Describe the major components of your PM&M System/Program
15
Source:http://echarts.datamatic.io/
Do your change management efforts involve any of the following?
16
How would you rate the importance of the following skills/capabilities of the PM&M group in creating & managing an effective PM&M System/Program?
17
Sponsor & Stake-holder Management
Problem Solving Team Building Process Improvement Change Leadership Project Management0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1817
15
13
12
11
8
2
5
7
8
9
7
1
0 0 0 0
5
HighMediumLow
What benefits has your PM&M System realized to date?
18
Source:http://raw.densitydesign.org/
Conclusion
19
Takeaways
Performance Management professionals felt support from the executive level and the organizational culture around data were the most important factors in establishing and maintaining a successful performance management program.
Performance Management programs tend to focus more on coaching and building organizational capacity rather than strictly doing data analysis or metric development, which they do as well.
PM&M programs most often use data analysis, strategic planning, and process improvement to change the way their organizations operate
Leaders of PM&M programs highly value their team members’ ability to manage relationships with stakeholders and problem solve
When talking about the benefits of their programs, leaders most commonly reference a large-scale organizational culture change around using data or a specific process improvement.
20
Contact Information
Daro Mott M.P.A., M.U.P., PMP, Lean Leader, Certified Six Sigma Black BeltDirector of Quality & Performance, Office of Performance Improvement & InnovationOffice of Mayor FischerLouisville Metro Government
Ed BlayneyM.P.A.OPI Fellow, Office of Performance Improvement & InnovationOffice of Mayor FischerLouisville Metro Government
21
