24
Plasma Dynamos UCLA January 5th 2009 Steve Cowley, UKAEA Culham and Imperial Thanks to Alex Schekochihin, Russell Kulsrud, Greg Hammett and Mark Rosin.

Plasma Dynamos

  • Upload
    jed

  • View
    50

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Plasma Dynamos. UCLA January 5th 2009 Steve Cowley, UKAEA Culham and Imperial Thanks to Alex Schekochihin, Russell Kulsrud, Greg Hammett and Mark Rosin. After re-ionization the universe was probably a reasonably collisionless turbulent high  plasma. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Plasma Dynamos

Plasma DynamosUCLA January 5th 2009

Steve Cowley, UKAEA Culham and Imperial

Thanks to Alex Schekochihin, Russell Kulsrud, Greg Hammett and Mark Rosin.

Page 2: Plasma Dynamos

Early magnetic fields -- what, when and how.

• After re-ionization the universe was probably a reasonably collisionless turbulent high plasma.

• Many large scale plasmas are quite collisionless. • I will argue that (random) magnetic fields grow rapidly

in such a plasma. • I will also argue that we need to know a lot more

about the small scale dynamics of high plasmas. We need an experiment at >> 1!

Page 3: Plasma Dynamos

Cluster Turbulence

The Coma Cluster: pressure map[Schuecker et al. 2004, A&A 426, 387]

L ~ 102…103 kpcU ~ 102…103 km/s (subsonic)L/U ~ 108…109yr

• Mergers• AGNs• Wakes

Page 4: Plasma Dynamos

Cluster Turbulence

Note: it is not obvious that there isturbulence! [A. Fabian 2003,MNRAS 344, L48]

• Mergers• AGNs• Wakes

L ~ 102…103 kpcU ~ 102…103 km/s (subsonic)L/U ~ 108…109yrmfp ~ 0.1…10 kpc

Re ~ 1…102

The Coma Cluster[Schuecker et al. 2004, A&A 426, 387]

Page 5: Plasma Dynamos

Cluster Magnetic Fields

Abell 400 cluster [Eilek & Owen 2002, ApJ 567, 202]

900 kpc

Page 6: Plasma Dynamos

Cluster MHD Turbulence

Turbulence scale is around here

TURBULENCEComa cluster

[Schuecker et al. 2004, A&A 426, 387]

MAGNETIC FIELDSHydra A Cluster

[Vogt & Enßlin 2005, A&A 434, 67]

•Magnetic Reynolds #, Rm ~ 10Magnetic Reynolds #, Rm ~ 102929..

Page 7: Plasma Dynamos

The Large Prandtl Number Case: Galaxies, Clusters etc.

• Magnetic Prandtl number = Pr = /.

• On the turnover time of the viscous eddies the “seed field” grows. The field develops structure below the viscous scale down to the resistive scale l= Pr -1/2 l

l

l = 10 -30kpcViscous scale

t

= 10 8 yearsViscous eddy Turnover.

Page 8: Plasma Dynamos

Isotropic Homogeneous Dynamo Folded Structure at Resistive Scale

Grayscale is |B|.

ScalarViscosity

Page 9: Plasma Dynamos

Plasma not Fluid

Page 10: Plasma Dynamos

Magnetized Viscosity --Anisotropic Pressure

Anisotropic pressure tensor in magnetized plasma. Because of fast motion around the field the tensor must be of the form:

DEFINITION OF PRESSURETENSOR.

Page 11: Plasma Dynamos

Magnetized Viscosity.

B

Collisionless particle motion restricted tobeing close to field line and conserving .

Compressing Field

Collisionless.Relaxed by Collisions.

P

Page 12: Plasma Dynamos

Incompressible Braginskii MHD.

Coefficients worked out by Braginskii Reviews of Plasma Physics Vol. 2.

Collisional limit

Unit vector along B

Page 13: Plasma Dynamos

Equilibrium -- Decreasing B.

V0 V0

B0

B0

Stretching rate

Page 14: Plasma Dynamos

Firehose Instability.

Look at instabilities that are smaller scale than the field and growing faster than the stretching rate. Treat B0 as quasi-constant during the growth.

We take perturbed velocity to go as:

The condition that the growth rate is faster than stretching rate is:

Page 15: Plasma Dynamos

Firehose Instability.

Linearized:

The x component becomes:

Perturbed field lineCurvature.

Page 16: Plasma Dynamos

Firehose Instability.

Putting this into force equation we get.

Alfven wave when no anisotropy

Page 17: Plasma Dynamos

More Firehose.

Parallel pressure forcessqueeze tube out.

Rosenbluth 1956Southwood and Kivelson 1993P|| P||

Tighter bend grows faster.

Unstable when

Growth rate at negligible B

Page 18: Plasma Dynamos

So What!? -- Nonlinear Firehose.

Nonlinear kinetic theory gives:

Rate of changeof B2 averaged along B.

Instability tries to keep average B constant by bending the field.

DivergingFlow.

Makes finite wiggles

Schekochihin et. al. Phys. Rev. Lett.

Page 19: Plasma Dynamos

Nonlinear Mirror Mode.

When the field increasing the plasma is unstable to the mirrorMode which creates little traps in the plasma.

Converging

Page 20: Plasma Dynamos

Stretching and compressing

Field decreasingP||>P FirehoseUnstable.

Field increasingP||< P Mirror modeUnstable.

Stretched at the turnover rate of theviscous eddies.

Using Braginskii’sExpression we getP||-P ~ Re-1/2P ~ P/6

Page 21: Plasma Dynamos

Scales

ll00~~1-3Mpc1-3Mpc

Viscous Scale l ~l0Re-3/4~10 - 30 kpc

l0 /u0~109

yearsl/ u~108

years

Mean-FreePath. mfp

~ l0Re-1~1-10kpc

kResistive Scale ~ l0Rm-1/2 ~ 104km

Ion LarmorRadiusScale @B = 1G~105km.

EB ?EV

Maximum growth rate

Page 22: Plasma Dynamos

ll00~~1-3Mpc1-3Mpc

Viscous Scale l ~l0Re-3/4~10 - 30 kpc

l0 /u0~109

yearsl/ u~108

years

Mean-FreePath. mfp

~ l0Re-1~1-10kpc

kResistive Scale ~ l0Rm-1/2 ~ 104km

Ion LarmorRadiusScale @B = 1G~105km.

EB ?EV

?

?

Scales

Page 23: Plasma Dynamos

What does small scale field do?

Enhanced particle scattering? Effective collisions increase --i? If so viscosity decreases -- Re gets large and turbulence has faster motions.

Dynamo Growth Time: ~ 0( i/L)(1/2) ~ 1000 years!

MAGNETIC FIELD CAN GROW ON TRIVIAL TIMESCALES.

Sharma, Hammett, Schekochihin, Kulsrud etc.

Page 24: Plasma Dynamos

Conclusions.

• Small scale fast growing instabilities to be expected in weak field magnetized fully ionized plasmas. Make finite wiggles on the scale almost of the ion larmor radius.

• May enhance collisions, dissipation and change the transport properties.