Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CONSULTATION STATEMENT (Prepared under regulation 18(4)(b))
The Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004
Planning Contributions for Transport Supplementary Planning Document
Rushmoor Borough Council
1. Who was consulted? Before adopting the Planning Contributions for Transport Supplementary Planning Document (SPD), as part of the Rushmoor Plan (LDF), the Council consulted with those bodies listed in appendix I to gather their views.
2. How were they consulted? A six-week public consultation period took place from 22 February 2009 to 3rd April 2008. The draft SPD was supported by a Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and a Habitats Regulations Assessment (draft report). Letters dated 20 February 2008 were sent as in appendices II, III and IV. The SPD and its accompanying sustainability appraisal were attached to the letter sent to the statutory consultees (see appendix II). The non-statutory consultees were referred to the website etc (see appendix III). The relevant nature conservation consultees were sent the draft SPD, its accompanying sustainability appraisal and a draft Habitats Regulations Assessment report (see appendix IV). All three documents were available for viewing and downloading via the Rushmoor website at: www.rushmoor.gov.uk/spds. Paper copies of all three documents were available via the Planning Policy section at Rushmoor, and available to view at:
the Council Offices (first floor reception 8.30am-5pm Monday-Thursday and 8.30am-4.30pm),
Farnborough and Aldershot libraries during their opening hours (Farnborough: 9.30-7pm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday, Wednesday 9.30am-5pm, and Saturday 9.30am-4pm; Aldershot 10am-7pm Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday; 10am –5pm Friday, and 9.30am-4pm Saturday).
An article was included in the February edition of the Borough Council’s internal ‘Bulletin’. There was an advertisement included in the local free ‘Star’
- 1 -
newspaper on 21 February 2008. The Borough Council also released a press release in association with the consultation to all local media (see Appendix V). The draft SPD stage of the process followed adoption of Hampshire County Council’s Transport Contributions Policy: A New Approach to Calculating Transport Contributions in Hampshire (September 2007).
3. What issues were raised?
We received 19 responses duly made and the main issues raised are shown in Appendix VI. A full list of respondents is shown in Appendix VII.
4. How were the issues addressed?
Appendix VI lists the comments made and the action taken (i.e. amendments to draft SPD prior to adoption). No projects were added or omitted however.
- 2 -
LIST OF APPENDICES:
I. Names of persons consulted in connection with the preparation of the draft SPD
II. Letter to statutory consultees III. Letter to non-statutory consultees IV. Letter to listed nature conservation consultees V. Press Release and Poster
VI. Comments and Responses to the draft SPD
VII. List of Respondents
- 3 -
APPENDIX I: Names of persons consulted in connection with the preparation of the draft SPD Statutory and non-statutory consultees:
CONTACT ORGANISATION Mr J Cheston GOSE Ms P Alexander SEEDA Ms C Riddell SEERA Ms S Janota SEERA Mr S Blyth Hampshire County Council Mr B Clifton Hampshire County Council Ms T Haskins Guildford Borough Council Mr R Evans Surrey County Council Mr R Hawkey Hart DC Ms J Rickard Surrey Heath BC Ms G Malony Waverley Borough Council Ms B Hindle Bracknell Forest Borough Council Ms C Barrett Highways Agency Mr D Baker Environment Agency Mr K Hewitt Natural England Equal Opportunities Commission Mr S Williams English Heritage
The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England Ms C Wilson Mobile Operators Association The National Grid Co. Plc Hants PCT Mr P Keeling Surrey Hampshire Borders NHS Trust Ms P Coster Hampshire Primary Care Trust Mr L Chasteauneuf Frimley Park Hospital Southern Electricity Plc Ms T Ward National Grid Mr A Ball South East Water Mr R Boother Thames Water Property Services Mr J Collis Hampshire Waste Services Mr B O'Reilly TAG Farnborough Airport Ltd BT Mr D Mather Asda Foodstore Mr P Austin Austin Phoenix Mr J Jerome Aldershot Retail Action Group Ms M Callcut Sony Ericsson Ms B Hansell QinetiQ Mr J Smith BAE Systems plc Mr T Bridgeman QinetiQ
- 4 -
Mr P Piercy Computer Sciences Corporation Ms A Roberts LAH Marketing Mr E Godfrey B&Q Ms J Gill Marks and Spencer Ms K Gullett Montagu Evans
Ms V Cloke North Hampshire Chamber of Commerce and Industry Ltd Novartis UK Ltd Mr R Waterman QinetiQ Mr N Litchfield Vertu Mr T Bolland Sainbury's Supermarkets Limited Mr J Grenham Sheldons (Farnborough) Ltd Ms C Darcey The Marketing Office Dr A Cooper Nokia Telecommunications Ltd Mr F Franklin HQ Aldershot Garrison Dr K Briggs RSPB/Urban Wildlife Group Mr T Griggs Fleet Community Hospital MB Design Services William Cook Associates Cove Construction LJ Osmond and Associates Tuline Ltd Yateley Designs KDH Design Services Ltd Jones Lang LaSalle Warmerhouse Zenith Conservatories Martin Perigo Day Tanner Partnership Ltd MGH Design Services Ltd David Harding Associates TL & L Design Ltd Light & Partners Paul Hewett Chartered Architect Signseen Ltd Philip Design Associates William Nimmo & Partners
MGA Town Planning & Development Consultants John Fraser Architect Probus Technical KC Sampla Ascot Design QV Consultants Adams Associates Ltd Aldershot Underwood Bowling Club Faber Technical Ltd Baker Consulting Services
- 5 -
Ray Robinson Design Services Silverley Homes Ltd RCC Ltd Peter Minett & Partners Jeremy Keep Associates Mr M Tuthill Barratt Southern Counties Ms R Patterson Devplan UK Kourosh Design AWA Ltd Ms J Smallman English Partnerships Pavillion Development Ltd Thorne Barton Estates Ltd Mr A Williams Gleeson Homes Ltd Mr N Hilder H H Hilder & Sons Ms S Baines Hyde Housing Association Hestia Limited Mr P Johnson Johnson Designs Martlet Development Consultants Duncan Soudan Cunningham Lindsey CL Design The Hall Design Group Ltd Mr C Heaney Persimmon Homes Mr S Gough Fairview New Homes Mr D Staniland George Wimpey Southern Ltd Mr S Bolton Try Homes Mr P Thompson McCarthy & Stone (Developments) Ltd Rialto Homes plc Jonathon Barlow Partnership Ltd Rocare Building Services Ltd CDS Development Services Ltd Simon Cooper Developments Ltd LSI Architects LLP Trident House Design Group Phillips Associates Wilcon Homes Wimpey Homes Holdings Ltd The Abel Partnership Mr N Fisher Planning Issues Ms A Turner Jones Day Mr F Ambrosini RD Planning and Land Consultants Ms L Ross Stewart Ross Associates Mr A Stenhouse Standard Life Property Investments Fund Ms LCowrie Lennon Planning Ltd Alliance Environment and Planning Ltd Ms T Eyles Radian Group Major J Usher Aldershot Garrison Ms B Garrett Aldershot & District West Indian Association
Mr MK Choudhary Aldershot & Farnborough Muslim, Social, Cultural & Education Society
- 6 -
Mr R Green Aldershot Allotment Association Mr L Lamplugh Aldershot Civic Society Aldershot Football Club Mr and Mrs Williamson Aldershot Historical Society Mr D Strong Aldershot Military Historical Trust Ms S Hulley Army Welfare Service Mr L Karim Begali Wefare, Islamic Education Centre Mr D Mahy St Joseph's Catholic Church Mr J Cook Churches Together in Aldershot Rev D Willey St Peters Church Citizens' Advice Bureaux Farnborough Town Football Club Mr R Gurung Greater Rushmoor Nepalese Communities Mr D Jebb Methodist Church Mr D Vaughton Park Evangelical Church Rev C Parker Baptist Church Councillor MS Choudhary Muslim Community Welfare Association
Mr T Metcalfe Netley & Winchester Street Residents' Association
Mr A Furness Netley & Winchester Street Residents' Association Ns N Williams North Lane Residents' Association Mr JJames Elim Pentecostal Church Mrs J Muir Peabody Road Residents Association Mr M Walker Peacock & Smith Mr M Axford Planning Department Potters International Hotel Mr E Tildesley Church of the Ascension Mr J Martin St Michael the Arch Angel Mr K Hodges St Augustine's Mr N Stephens Rushmoor and District Football League Mr C Higham Searchlight Mr P Bullus Southwood Residents Association Mr S Haire Surrey Ambulance Service Ms D Cole U3A Mr G Newton Holy Trinity C of E Church Mrs P Snashell Womens Institute HQ Aldershot Garrsion Mr D Bevan South West Trains Marwalk Developments Tesco Stores Ltd White Young Green Ms C Dollery Hampshire Primary Care Trust Westbury Homes Ltd Lambert Smith Hampton Mrs A Chambers Cove and Farnborough W.I. Mrs B Goodchild Cherrywood Community Primary School Mrs J Armstrong Farnborough Grange Infant School Miss J Thomas Farnborough Hill
- 7 -
Mrs K Wood Fernhill County Primary School Mrs C Wareham Grange County Community Junior School Mrs C Bird Marlborough County Infant School Mrs M Moore North Farnborough County Infant School Mrs L Downes Parsonage Farm County Infant School Mrs S Harris Pinewood County Infant School Miss H Fletcher Davies South Farnborough County Infant School Mrs J Hooper St Bernadette's RC (A) Primary School Mrs F Hodgson St Marks C of E (A) Primary School Mrs S Bright St Michaels C E (controlled) Infant School Miss J Batstone Talavera County Infant School Mr T Hall Talavera County Junior School Mr J Hanna The Connaught School Miss A Rowley The Wavell School Ms C Jenkin West End County Infant School BT Mr D Windser Mr M Thomas TAG Farnborough Airport Ltd Ms S Clark HCC, Environment Department Department for Transport Mr C Crocker Housing Group, Electricity Southern Electricity Plc Mr S Greener TAG Farnborough Airport Limited R Hopkins Hampshire Primary Care Trust Ms S Hathaway Rushmoor Voluntary Services Colonel N Josling Aldershot Garrison Mr G Di Palma Conceptual Design Associates Ltd Mr M K Choudhary Pinecraft Developments Ltd Ms JRawlings Aldershot Town Centre Manager Mr D Carr Business Link Wessex Mr P Formstone Federation of Small Businesses Mr J Mitchell Enterprise First Mr N Wood QM Systems Ltd Mr J Gregory Hampshire Economic Partnership Mr D Mackay DC Leisure Management Ltd Mr M Lloyd Defence Estates Development Manager, SEGRO
Ms R McKellar Learning and Skills Council - Hampshire and I of W Mr G Rowlands Farnborough Air Sciences Trust Mr I Wolloff Farnborough College of Technology PC 1145 L Jeffers Farnborough Police Station Mr J Hilson Hilson Moran Partnership Mr K Harpley London Clancy Mr J Harrocks North Hants Chamber of Commerce Mr D Bowen Vail Williams Mr R Hedges TAG Farnborough Airport Ltd Mr S Rutter Key Property Investments (Number One) Ltd Mr P Larkin Systems Union Ltd
- 8 -
Mr J Watt The George Hotel Mr A Morris Town and Country Markets Mr I Webb Wilky Property Holdings Mr C Butler Wilky Property Holdings Mr C Thomas Chris Thomas Ltd Mr G Morris White Young Green Planning Mr S Bailey Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership Ms C Waite Blackwater Wildlife Rescue Ms C Barrowclough Council for British Archaeology Ms A Hebbert Cove Brook Greenway Group Ms A Preston Environment Centre Mr A Ashurst Friends of the Earth, Blackwater Valley Dr P Holmes Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust W F Fergie Hampshire Buildings Preservation Trust Mr J Eyre Hampshire Ornithological Society IWA Guildford & Reading Branch Ms K Adderley British Wind Energy Ms C Temple RSPB Mr J Dawkins RSPB Mr P Riley Surrey & Hampshire Canal Society Victorian Society Mr J Whitaker Surrey CC Access Forum Miss A Dodds The British Wind Energy Association Mr R Stennett CGM Solictors Award Design LWK Design Davtee Chartered Building Consultancy AKH Associates Graeme Stevenson Architects Ltd Giuseppe Zanre Charles Planning Associates Ltd Butterfield Signs Ltd Macallan Penfold Ms R Caines RPS Planning The Graham Bolton Planning Partnership GVA Grimley John Cooper Associates Turner Associates Lambert Smith Hampton Young and Butt ABS Consulting Ltd Allies and Morrsion Architects Willes Simpson Woods Tvedt Group Ltd Annington Homes Ms K Cortizo Aspire Defence Services Ltd Bloor Homes Mr D Thomson CABE
- 9 -
Sipson Gray Ltd Ms L Mason CB Richard Ellis Charles Church Developments Charters of Aldershot Ltd Mr I Taylor Raglan Housing Association Mr E Dawson CPRE CPRE (Hart and Rushnmoor DG) Mr M Griffiths Dreweatt Neate Mr R Shaw and Ms A Budge F P D Savills HGP Architects Ltd Ms M Wylie A2 Housing Group Trinder Architectural Ltd Bucknall Austin Mr C Harrington Hyde Housing Association Mr C Gibbons Development Planning Services Mr B Wren Home Builders Federation Mr M O’Brien Linden Homes Southern Ltd Hart Housing Association Bellwinch Homes Ltd Woodward Ambrose Architects Ltd Trinity Architecture Ltd Mr P Kirby Martin Grant Homes Omega Signs Mr A Kayani Bell Cornwell Partnership Ms T Eyles Parkside Housing Group Mr A Emerson Pavilion Housing Association Mr JBrindley Bellway Homes ETC Architects Ms L Weaver Levvel Premier Properties Plc Gregory Gray Associates TM Building Contractors Mr C Kiely Robert Shaw/Vail Williams Planning Mansell Construction Services Albion Planning Consultants Ms J Porter Sentinel HA Ms V Bagnall Sentinel HA Mr P Turner Daly International Ms Y Edgar Thames Valley Housing Association Mr G Burnett Thames Valley Housing Association Ms K Chapman Thames Valley Housing Association Accent Peerless Stone Ecclesiastical Bryan Jezeph Consultancy Artis Projects Ltd White Young Green Planning Arcadia Homes Ltd Drake & Kannemeyer
- 10 -
Needham Haddrell Chartered Surveyors SMC Gower Architects Camberley Rubber Mouldings Ltd Elite Econoloft Ltd Glasshouse Company AAP Architecture Wates Homes Ltd Brimble Lea & Partners Mr M Ashton West Waddy ADP Mr J Curren Alder King Property Consultants Mr S Irving Landmark Information Group Ltd Mr I Sowerby The Bell Cornwell Partnership Mr C Pittock Tibbalds Planning & Urban Design Ms A Gillings Rapleys Commercial Property & Planning Consultants Mr D Ames David Ames Associates (for David Wilson Homes Ltd) Mr P Beetham Bracknell Forest Borough Council S Conlan Crest Nicholson Merlion Homes Ms B Southon KC21 Kings Church Mr L Hall Blackwater Valley District Scouts Ms M Gregory Connaught Community Centre Ms C Vernon-Jackson Community Action Mr A Kennedy Rushmoor District Youth Office DeafPlus Mr O Durrett Rushmoor Access Group T Dal Dewan Gurkha Welfare Society Gypsy Council
Mr B Richards Hampshire Association for the Care of the Blind Ms K Evans NE Hants Domestic Violence Forum Mr M Richardson Lennon Planning Ltd Mr S Hanley Local Dialogue LLP Mr R Collier Tourism South East Mrs S Lucas North Camp Matters Mr J Packman Rapleys LLP Ms K Walker Royal Mail Group Ms T Scanlan Tetlow King Planning Ms R Freeman The Theatres Trust Mr A Jones White Young Green Mr A King Workspace Group Plc Mr G Howarth House of Commons Ms G Wells Cadsquare Ltd Ms H Castell About my Area Ms H Inger Director of Strategic Development Mr A Bateman The Planning Bureau Limited Mr C Allington Hampshire Economic Partnership Ms D Knowles Mytchett, Frimley Green and Deepcut Society Mr K Daley Mytchett, Frimley Green and Deepcut Society Mr I Lawson Hampshire County Council
- 11 -
Mr R Omerod Hampshire County Council Mr R Greaves National Grid UK Transmission Mr G Marks Farnborough Airport Residents Association Ms L Clementson Hampshire County Council Ms S Robbins Supporting People Team Mr R Barr Royal Pavillion Ms J Baldwin Explore! Ms K Matthews Firstplan Mr S Mitchell DHA Architecture Mr A Wilson Drivers Jonas Mr R Blackburn Planning Potential Mr G Alexander Rushmoor Voluntary Services Miss K Nye Beaumont County Junior School Mrs A Bassford Belle Vue County Infant School Mrs Jt Sampson Cove Infant School Mrs H Dunn Cove Junior School Ms M Jones Cove School Mr C Gilbert Fernhill School Miss B Cook Guillemont County Junior School Mr R Thompson Henry Tyndale School Mrs M Penman Manor County Infant School Mr MSammes Manor County Junior School Mrs J Sargent Newport County Junior School Mr G Earney Oak Farm Community School Mrs P Durance Park County Primary School Mr P Wilson Salesian College Mrs L Smith South Farnborough County Junior School Mrs VFavell Southwood County Infant School Mr B James St Josephs RC (GM) Primary School Mrs E Wren St Patricks RC (A) Primary School Mrs E Collis St Peters C of E (A) Junior School Mrs A Dawson The Samuel Cody School Mr M Dunbavand Tower Hill County Primary School Ms D Glenn Hampshire Primary Care Trust Ms H Clanchy Hampshire Primary Care Trust Mrs H Lewis Crondall Parish Council Clerk Mr T Davison HCC Estates Mr F Baxter Hampshire Transport policy
Mr S McVernon Public Affairs Manager Ms C Saunders Waste Management, Hampshire CC Mr C Mills Atisreal UK Mrs C Bosworth HCC Mr I Brown Basingstoke Canal Authority Ms C Sewell Guildford Diocese Mr A Hughes Rushmoor Citizens' Advice Bureaux Mrs C Davis Farnborough College of Technology Ms P Bushell First Wessex Housing Group Chief Superintendent P Aldershot Police Station
- 12 -
Netherton Mr T Docker Rushmoor Healthy Living Ms A Cooper Parity for Disability Mr R Lane Farnborough Civic Society Farnborough and Aldershot Residents x53
- 13 -
APPENDIX II: Letter to Statutory Consultees
Jim Pettitt
01252 398200
Dear
20th February 2008
Supplementary Planning Documents Consultation I am writing to let you know that we are seeking your views on two draft Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs):
• Car and Cycle Parking Standards Draft SPD and its Sustainability Appraisal. The SPD provides guidance on the provision of car parking space on new developments.
• Planning Contributions: Transport Draft SPD and its Sustainability Appraisal. The SPD provides guidance on transport contributions that may be required for planning applications.
An electronic copy of the Supplementary Planning Documents are included in the form of a CD. The documents and accompanying documents can also be found on our website via: www.rushmoor.gov.uk/spds. The documents are available for consultation for six weeks, and we will need to receive any comments by 5pm on 3rd April 2008. You can submit your comments by email to [email protected] , or by post to: SPD Consultations, Planning Services, Rushmoor Borough Council, Council Offices, Farnborough Road, Farnborough, GU14 7JU. We look forward to receiving your comments and will notify you of the adoption of the SPDs, following consideration of all the representations made. Yours sincerely Jim Pettitt Transportation Strategy Officer Planning Services
- 14 -
APPENDIX III: Letter to Non-Statutory Consultees
Jim Pettitt
01252 398200
20th February 2008
Dear Supplementary Planning Documents Consultation I am writing to inform you that we are consulting on two draft Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs):
• Car and Cycle Parking Standards Draft SPD and its Sustainability Appraisal. The SPD provides guidance on the provision of car parking space on new developments.
• Planning Contributions: Transport Draft SPD and its Sustainability Appraisal. The SPD provides guidance on transport contributions that may be required for planning applications.
Copies of both documents and other supporting documents can be found online at www.rushmoor.gov.uk/spds. Copies are available for public inspection (during normal opening hours) at the Customer Services Unit in the Council Offices (8.30-4.30pm) on Farnborough road, the Aldershot Office (8.45-4.15pm) and the Aldershot and Farnborough libraries (during normal opening hours). The documents are available for consultation for six weeks, and we will need to receive any comments by 5pm on 3rd April 2008. You can submit your comments by email to [email protected] or by post to: SPD Consultations, Planning Services, Rushmoor Borough Council, Council Offices, Farnborough Road, Farnborough, GU14 7JU. Please let us know if you wish to be notified of the adoption of the Supplementary Planning Documents Yours sincerely Jim Pettitt Transportation Strategy Officer Planning Services
- 15 -
APPENDIX IV: Email to Nature Conservation Consultees I am writing to let you know that we are seeking your views on two Supplementary Planning Documents (SPD):
• Car and Cycle Parking Standards SPD and its Sustainability Appraisal • Planning Contributions: Transport SPD and its Sustainability Appraisal
The draft SPDs will be also accompanied by a draft Habitats Regulation Assessment (prepared under The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) (Amendment) Regulations 2007). Prior to finalising the SPDs, we are consulting Natural England and other relevant agencies, seeking comments and advice on these reports. As soon as the draft Habitats Regulations Assessment have been finalised, copies will be sent to you, along with electronic copies of the draft SPD and accompanying SA on a CD. In the meantime the draft SPD and the accompanying SA can be found online at www.rushmoor.gov.uk/spds The documents are available for consultation for six weeks and we need to receive any comments by 3rd April 2008. Should you be unable to meet this timescale please let me know, otherwise it will be assumed that you have no comments to make. You can submit your comments in writing by email to [email protected] or by post to: Supplementary Planning Documents Consultation Planning Services Rushmoor Borough Council Farnborough Road Farnborough Hampshire GU14 7JU Jon Fewing Natural England Government Offices Coley Park Reading RG1 6DT Derek Baker Planning Environment Agency Swift House Frimley Business Park Camberley Surrey Carrie Temple RSPB
- 16 -
Carrie Temple SE England Office The Lodge Sandy Bedfordshire Dr. Pauline Holmes Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Beechcroft House Vicarage Lane Curdridge Hampshire Steve Bailey Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership Ash Lock Cottage Government Road Aldershot Hampshire
- 17 -
APPENDIX V: Press release and Poster
Rushmoor Reviews its Parking standards for new development
Parking standards on new development across Aldershot and Farnborough have been reviewed by Rushmoor Borough Council and comments on a new Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to outline what will be expected of developers in the future are welcomed by the Council. The new standards reflect national guidance and apply them more flexibly to suit the particular needs of people who live and work in Rushmoor. Previous national guidance on parking standards, aimed to encourage reductions in car ownership by providing less parking in places with good accessibility to public transport and therefore placing less reliance on the car. A change in this national guidance means that the Council has been able to review this policy and make changes to better reflect the situation in Rushmoor. The review has shown that car ownership isn’t always affected or reduced when a development is in an accessible location close to community facilities and transport links. The review has also led the Council to look at ways to improve parking options in new developments by using better design and layout to maximise spaces and ensure that parking is safe and accessible. Councillor Roland Dibbs, Cabinet Member for Environment said: "Many of the existing parking problems in residential areas are linked to increasing levels of car ownership and this is something we will be considering as part of the review. The decision for car ownership is not always effected by the other transport options available locally and even with good transport links, many residents still choose to have a car.” Councillor Dibbs, added: “It is vital that sufficient car parking spaces are included in new developments. It is also just as important that parking layouts in our residential areas are accessible, of high quality and are safe and secure for the people of Rushmoor.” Public consultation on this Supplementary Planning Document (SPDs) on Parking standards as well as another which sets out the Council’s approach to implement Hampshire County Council’s Transport Contributions Policy for determining planning contributions for highway starts on Friday 22nd February and runs until 3rd April. Copies of the SPD can be seen at the Council Offices in Aldershot and Farnborough, Aldershot and Farnborough libraries and Online at www.rushmoor.gov.uk/spds
- 18 -
APP
END
IX V
I: C
omm
ents
and
Res
pons
es to
the
draf
t SPD
Pl
anni
ng C
ontr
ibut
ions
: Tra
nspo
rt
Dra
ft Su
pple
men
tary
Pla
nnin
g D
ocum
ent
Sum
mar
y of
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed a
nd p
ropo
sed
reco
mm
ende
d ch
ange
s M
arch
-Apr
il 20
08
This
doc
umen
t has
bee
n pr
epar
ed b
y R
ushm
oor B
orou
gh C
ounc
il.
It pr
ovid
es a
com
preh
ensi
ve li
st o
f the
com
men
ts, w
hich
wer
e re
ceiv
ed
durin
g th
e st
atut
ory
cons
ulta
tion
perio
d on
the
draf
t pla
nnin
g co
ntrib
utio
ns
(Tra
nspo
rt) S
PD
, whi
ch ra
n fro
m 2
2 Fe
brua
ry 2
008-
3rd
Apr
il.
For e
ach
of th
e co
mm
ents
mad
e, a
resp
onse
has
bee
n dr
afte
d.
- 20
-
N
o.
Nam
e C
omm
ent
Rec
omm
enda
tion
1 A
nna
Gill
ings
C
omm
ents
are
sub
mitt
ed fo
llow
ing
resp
onse
s su
bmitt
ed p
revi
ousl
y to
H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
whe
n th
e po
licy
was
firs
t pub
lishe
d.
Wilk
y ac
cept
th
e pr
inci
ple
of
a fo
rmul
a ba
sed
appr
oach
to
co
ntrib
utio
ns, w
hich
pro
vide
s co
nsis
tenc
y an
d ce
rtain
ty.
How
ever
, to
ensu
re c
ontri
butio
ns a
re d
irect
ly a
nd r
easo
nabl
y re
late
d in
sca
le a
nd
kind
to a
pro
posa
l, th
e po
licy
mus
t allo
w fo
r loc
al c
ircum
stan
ces.
To
thi
s en
d, t
he a
ccep
tanc
e of
the
use
of
site
spe
cific
Tra
nspo
rt A
sses
smen
ts to
qua
ntify
the
mul
timod
al tr
ips
gene
rate
d by
a p
ropo
sal
is w
elco
med
. Th
is w
ill al
low
for m
ore
appr
opria
te a
sses
smen
t
.App
licat
ion
of th
e tra
nspo
rt co
ntrib
utio
ns p
olic
y w
ill ta
ke in
to
acco
unt l
ocal
circ
umst
ance
s by
con
side
ring
the
impa
ct o
f the
de
velo
pmen
t on
the
loca
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
and
com
parin
g th
is a
gain
st
the
exis
ting
situ
atio
n.
How
ever
, a s
tand
ard
cost
per
trip
figu
re h
as a
lso
been
app
lied
by th
e S
PD
to a
ll us
es o
utsi
de r
esid
entia
l. T
his
mus
t be
just
ified
, and
mus
t be
spe
cific
ally
app
licab
le t
o th
e us
e pr
opos
ed,
base
d on
evi
denc
e.
With
out s
uch
evid
ence
, the
nec
essi
ty o
f the
pay
men
t is
ques
tione
d.
Ham
pshi
re c
ount
y co
unci
l has
det
erm
ined
the
leve
l of c
ontri
butio
n in
re
latio
n to
the
num
ber o
f mul
ti-m
odal
trip
s th
at c
an b
e ex
pect
ed fr
om
the
deve
lopm
ents
.
The
allo
wan
ce i
n th
e H
CC
pol
icy
whi
ch s
tate
s th
at ‘
the
econ
omic
vi
abili
ty o
f th
e si
te w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
and
the
re w
ill b
e sc
ope
of
nego
tiate
fro
m t
he s
tarti
ng c
ontri
butio
n’,
mus
t be
tra
nsla
ted
into
the
S
PD
. T
his
is a
crit
ical
par
t of
the
HC
C p
olic
y, a
nd a
gain
allo
ws
for
loca
l si
te
spec
ific
circ
umst
ance
s to
be
ac
com
mod
ated
in
an
y ne
gotia
tion.
Prin
cipl
e 3
stat
es th
at w
hen
a si
te h
as b
een
in p
revi
ous
use
the
net
incr
ease
in m
ulit-
mod
al tr
ips
will
be u
sed
to c
alcu
late
the
cont
ribut
ion.
Ther
e is
no
just
ifica
tion
for t
he c
avea
t to
Prin
cipl
e 3,
that
‘whe
re a
site
ha
s be
en d
orm
ant
for
5 ye
ars
or m
ore,
all
traffi
c ge
nera
ted
will
be
cons
ider
ed n
ew t
o th
e ne
twor
k’.
Thi
s is
unr
easo
nabl
e.
If a
use
rem
ains
unl
awfu
l, th
en i
t ca
n be
rei
nitia
ted
at a
ny t
ime
with
out
the
need
for p
lann
ing
perm
issi
on (s
ubje
ct to
aba
ndon
men
t tes
ts w
hich
are
a
mat
ter
of f
act
and
degr
ee).
Thi
s is
rou
tinel
y ac
cept
ed t
o fo
rm t
he
base
line
posi
tion
in t
rans
port
Ass
essm
ents
. T
his
cave
at d
oes
not
appe
ar in
the
HC
C g
uida
nce
and
ther
e is
no
basi
s to
incl
ude
it at
the
loca
l lev
el.
The
cave
at re
latin
g to
site
s th
at h
ave
been
dor
man
t for
5 y
ears
or
mor
e is
incl
uded
in th
e H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
Tran
spor
t C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y (p
ara
6.3)
.
The
acce
ptan
ce
that
co
ntrib
utio
ns
shou
ld
be
ring
fenc
ed,
and
repa
yabl
e if
unsp
ent i
s w
elco
med
. H
owev
er, t
he S
PD s
houl
d co
nfirm
th
at th
e co
ntrib
utio
n is
pay
able
onl
y on
impl
emen
tatio
n, a
nd a
llow
for
phas
ed p
aym
ents
, ens
urin
g th
at th
e pa
ymen
t of c
ontri
butio
ns e
quat
es
with
the
gene
ratio
n of
impa
ct.
Thes
e ch
ange
s w
ould
ens
ure
that
the
pay
men
ts o
f co
ntrib
utio
ns o
n th
is b
asis
pas
s th
e te
sts
of C
ircul
ar 0
5/05
.
The
timin
g an
d ph
asin
g of
pay
men
ts w
ill be
agr
eed
with
the
deve
lope
r as
they
may
var
y ac
ross
diff
eren
t typ
es o
f dev
elop
men
t.
The
polic
y w
ill be
app
lied
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e te
sts
of C
ircul
ar
05/0
5.
2 A
ndre
w
Her
ring
Prin
cipl
e 1
- The
last
sen
tenc
e co
uld
read
bet
ter:
the
polic
y is
to a
pply
to
all
deve
lopm
ent p
ropo
sals
for n
ew d
evel
opm
ent,
rede
velo
pmen
t or
The
Ham
pshi
re C
ount
y C
ounc
il Tr
ansp
ort C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y re
fers
to
new
“dev
elop
men
ts o
f all
size
s, fr
om a
sin
gle
unit
upw
ards
” and
- 21
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n H
CC
fo
r ext
ensi
ons
to e
xist
ing
deve
lopm
ent.
In it
s su
btex
t the
Prin
cipl
e sh
ould
say
'and
ser
vice
s' a
fter o
ff-si
te tr
ansp
ort i
nfra
stru
ctur
e.
does
not
incl
ude
exte
nsio
ns to
exi
stin
g de
velo
pmen
t.
Prin
cipl
e 3
Sub-
text
: Pa
ragr
aph
1 -
Whe
re th
e su
b-te
xt o
f Prin
cipl
e 3
prop
oses
that
if s
ites
with
a p
revi
ous
use
have
rem
aine
d do
rman
t for
5
year
s th
ey w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
as
havi
ng a
‘new
’ tra
nspo
rt im
pact
, E
stat
es h
ave
a nu
mbe
r of c
once
rns.
Whe
re a
site
has
an
esta
blis
hed
use
(irre
spec
tive
of w
heth
er it
has
bee
n do
rman
t for
5 y
ears
), it
can
resu
me
this
use
with
in 1
0 ye
ars
whe
re it
can
be
dem
onst
rate
d th
at it
ha
s th
e ca
paci
ty to
resu
me
this
use
. Cur
rent
ly u
nder
pla
nnin
g la
w th
e hi
stor
ic tr
ansp
ort i
mpa
ct o
n th
e hi
ghw
ay n
etw
ork
is a
ccou
nted
for a
s pa
rt of
the
prop
osed
re-d
evel
opm
ent o
f the
site
. By
only
con
side
ring
dorm
ant s
ites
for 5
yea
rs a
nd n
ot 1
0, th
is d
oes
not f
ully
take
acc
ount
th
e ex
istin
g pl
anni
ng le
gisl
atio
n. It
is re
com
men
ded
that
a lo
cally
es
tabl
ishe
d nu
mbe
r of y
ears
for w
hen
a do
rman
t site
will
no-lo
nger
be
cons
ider
ed to
hav
e an
est
ablis
hed
trans
port
impa
ct b
e co
nsid
ered
fu
rther
to th
is c
omm
ent.
It is
not
pro
pose
d to
var
y fro
m th
e H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
Tran
spor
t Con
tribu
tions
Pol
icy
whi
ch s
tate
s 5
year
s.
Prin
cipl
e 4
has
been
re-w
orde
d to
read
“Bor
ough
”. T
he S
PD
is
intro
duce
d to
ena
ble
the
Bor
ough
as
Pla
nnin
g au
thor
ity to
app
ly th
e H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
Tran
spor
t Con
tribu
tions
Pol
icy.
The
le
vel o
f con
tribu
tions
ther
efor
e fo
llow
s th
is p
olic
y to
ena
ble
the
cons
iste
nt a
ppro
ach
acro
ss th
e co
unty
that
is u
nder
stoo
d to
be
a fu
ndam
enta
l par
t of t
he c
ount
y po
licy.
Prin
cipl
e 4
Sho
uld
this
prin
cipl
e no
t ref
er to
Bor
ough
rath
er th
an C
ount
y,
cons
ider
ing
it re
late
s to
the
Rus
hmoo
r are
a?
It is
app
reci
ated
that
the
Pla
nnin
g C
ontri
butio
ns: T
rans
port
SP
D is
ba
sed
on th
e C
ount
y C
ounc
il Tr
ansp
ort P
olic
y G
uida
nce
whe
rein
the
prop
osed
cos
t-per
resi
dent
ial m
ulti-
mod
al tr
ip is
bas
ed o
n re
cent
G
reen
field
MD
A d
evel
opm
ent a
cros
s H
amps
hire
. In
addi
tion
to th
e pr
opos
ed c
ost-p
er m
ulti-
mod
al tr
ip, t
he C
ount
y C
ounc
il w
ould
be
inte
rest
ed to
kno
w if
any
loca
l res
earc
h be
en u
nder
take
n in
to tr
ansp
ort
cont
ribut
ions
from
Bro
wnf
ield
win
dfal
l site
s w
ithin
the
Bor
ough
?. G
iven
th
at B
row
nfie
ld s
ites
alre
ady
have
est
ablis
hed
high
way
infra
stru
ctur
e an
d m
ay b
e su
bjec
t to
rem
edia
tion
cost
s, th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
a
Gre
enfie
ld-b
ased
tarif
f may
redu
ce th
e vi
abilit
y of
futu
re B
row
nfie
ld
deve
lopm
ent a
nd m
ake
win
dfal
ls le
ss li
kely
to c
ome
forw
ard.
It i
s su
gges
ted
that
a g
rade
d ta
riff b
e co
nsid
ered
for n
on-M
DA
site
s to
take
th
is in
to a
ccou
nt.
Prin
cipl
e 6
In
the
subt
ext –
For
cla
rity
this
cou
ld s
ay 'R
esid
entia
l (C
lass
C3)
' N
ote
adde
d
Prin
cipl
e 7
In
the
subt
ext o
f Par
agra
ph 2
- Th
is s
houl
d sa
y 'a
pro
port
ion
of th
e co
st o
f the
se w
orks
may
be
dedu
ctib
le'
In th
e su
btex
t of P
arag
raph
3 -
'may
pro
vide
wid
er p
ublic
ben
efit'
sh
ould
be
repl
aced
with
'will
enc
oura
ge s
usta
inab
le a
cces
s to
and
fr
om th
e si
te'
The
wor
ding
in th
e dr
aft d
ocum
ent r
efle
cts
that
in th
e H
amps
hire
C
ount
y C
ounc
il Tr
ansp
ort C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y. I
t is
not p
ropo
sed
to
chan
ge th
is to
mai
ntai
n co
nsis
tenc
y ac
ross
the
coun
ty.
- 22
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n
Pr
inci
ple
8 Th
is s
houl
d re
fer t
o th
e D
epar
tmen
t for
Tra
nspo
rt’s
Gui
danc
e on
Tr
ansp
ort A
sses
smen
t eith
er in
the
Prin
cipl
e or
the
sub-
text
.
This
refe
renc
e is
now
add
ed.
Prin
cipl
e 9
Th
is s
houl
d sa
y 'tr
ansp
ort'
impr
ovem
ent r
athe
r tha
n 'h
ighw
ay' –
The
im
prov
emen
t nec
essa
ry m
ay n
ot b
e in
frast
ruct
ure
prov
isio
n ba
sed.
In
the
sub-
text
of P
arag
raph
3 -
The
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
supp
orts
the
‘pro
pose
d hi
ghw
ay im
prov
emen
ts li
st’ a
s th
is w
ill ad
d fu
rther
tra
nspa
renc
y fo
r dev
elop
ers
and
the
publ
ic in
rela
tion
to w
here
tra
nspo
rt co
ntrib
utio
ns a
re s
pent
.
The
refe
renc
e to
“hig
hway
” has
now
bee
n ch
ange
d to
“tra
nspo
rt”.
Sup
port
note
d.
Ther
e do
es n
ot a
ppea
r to
be a
ny d
irect
refe
renc
e to
Prin
cipl
e 11
of t
he
Car
and
Cyc
le P
arki
ng S
PD
whi
ch s
tate
s th
at ‘c
ontri
butio
ns m
ay b
e re
quire
d to
sec
ure
the
prov
isio
n of
bus
ser
vice
s fo
r up
to 5
yea
rs in
ac
cord
ance
with
the
SP
D o
n Tr
ansp
ort C
ontri
butio
ns’.
Prin
cipl
e 11
has
bee
n am
ende
d to
incl
ude
refe
renc
e to
sec
urin
g bu
s se
rvic
es fo
r up
to 5
yea
rs.
It is
not
cle
ar fr
om th
e S
PD
whe
ther
fina
ncia
l con
tribu
tions
tow
ards
bu
s se
rvic
es w
ill b
e in
add
ition
to th
e pr
opos
ed c
ost p
er m
ulti-
mod
al
trip
cont
ribut
ions
. It a
lso
does
not
app
ear t
o st
ate
whi
ch d
evel
opm
ents
(s
uch
as w
indf
alls
or S
DA
/MD
A) w
ill re
quire
con
tribu
tions
tow
ards
bus
se
rvic
es. I
t wou
ld b
e he
lpfu
l if t
he S
PD
cla
rifie
d th
e ab
ove
poin
ts a
nd
just
ified
any
nee
d fo
r add
ition
al b
us c
ontri
butio
ns fo
r 5 y
ears
. Th
e su
btex
t of P
rinci
ple
11 is
aga
inst
the
term
s of
the
DC
Age
ncy
Agr
eem
ent w
hich
requ
ires
all t
rans
port
cont
ribut
ions
to b
e pa
id d
irect
ly
to th
e C
ount
y C
ounc
il w
ithin
14
days
.
As
abov
e.
The
wor
ding
has
am
ende
d to
cla
rify
that
the
fund
s w
ill be
pas
sed
to
Ham
pshi
re C
ount
y C
ounc
il (u
nder
the
term
s of
the
DC
Age
ncy
agre
emen
t).
Whi
lst a
Con
tribu
tions
SP
D is
impo
rtant
, the
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
wou
ld b
e in
tere
sted
to k
now
why
the
Cou
ncil
has
opte
d fo
r a s
peci
fic T
rans
port
SP
D in
stea
d of
mor
e co
mpr
ehen
sive
adv
ice
with
in a
n S
PD
on
deve
lope
r obl
igat
ions
and
con
tribu
tions
to c
over
oth
er m
atte
rs e
.g.
open
spa
ce.
The
Bor
ough
Cou
ncil
has
a se
para
te p
olic
y on
ope
n sp
ace
cont
ribut
ions
and
is in
trodu
cing
this
SP
D a
t thi
s tim
e to
resp
ond
to
the
requ
est f
rom
Ham
pshi
re to
ena
ble
a co
nsis
tent
Tra
nspo
rt C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y ac
ross
the
coun
ty.
3 Em
ily B
utch
er
(see
Hab
itats
R
egul
atio
ns
Ass
essm
ent
draf
t rep
ort)
Follo
win
g th
e sc
reen
ing
exer
cise
(und
er th
e H
abita
ts R
egul
atio
ns
Ass
essm
ent)
It is
how
ever
reco
mm
ende
d th
at P
rinci
ple
9: N
eces
sary
H
ighw
ay Im
prov
emen
ts, i
nclu
des
mor
e in
form
atio
n on
the
loca
l sc
hem
es p
ropo
sed,
so
that
the
prox
imity
to th
e S
PA
and
nat
ure
of a
ny
cons
truct
ion
proj
ects
can
be
asse
ssed
. As
an a
ltern
ativ
e, th
ere
shou
ld
be a
n op
portu
nity
to a
sses
s an
y im
pact
s at
the
proj
ect l
evel
, as
spec
ific
deta
ils a
bout
the
high
way
sch
emes
ass
ocia
ted
with
de
velo
pmen
t pro
posa
ls b
ecom
e av
aila
ble.
Eith
er w
ay it
is
reco
mm
ende
d th
at th
is is
exp
lain
ed in
the
final
ised
SP
D.
All
trans
port
impr
ovem
ents
will
nee
d to
be
cons
ider
ed a
s se
para
te
deve
lopm
ent p
roje
cts
cons
ider
ed b
y th
e re
leva
nt p
lann
ing
proc
ess
whe
re n
eces
sary
, inc
ludi
ng th
e H
abita
ts R
egul
atio
ns.
4 G
eral
dine
M
olon
y Th
ank
you
for c
onsu
lting
us
on th
e "C
ar a
nd c
ycle
Par
king
Sta
ndar
ds
SP
D" a
nd th
e "P
lann
ing
Con
tribu
tions
: Tra
nspo
rt S
PD
". W
e do
not
ha
ve a
ny c
omm
ents
.
Res
pons
e no
ted.
- 23
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n 5
Gre
gory
Gra
y
Gen
eral
It is
requ
este
d th
at e
ach
para
grap
h is
num
bere
d in
divi
dual
ly th
roug
h ea
ch S
ectio
n fo
r eas
e of
refe
renc
e.
Not
ed
Prin
cipl
e 1
The
docu
men
t nee
ds to
refe
r exp
licitl
y to
the
fact
that
ther
e ar
e ty
pes
of la
nd u
se w
here
no
cont
ribut
ions
are
requ
ired
or w
here
a re
duce
d le
vel o
f con
tribu
tion
is re
ason
able
hav
ing
rega
rd to
the
natu
re a
nd th
e ch
arac
ter o
f the
use
and
in c
onse
quen
ce th
e ex
tent
to w
hich
it w
ill gi
ve
rise
to “t
rans
port
impa
cts”
. A
cas
e in
poi
nt is
affo
rdab
le h
ousi
ng a
nd in
par
ticul
ar s
helte
red
elde
rly
affo
rdab
le h
ousi
ng w
here
car
ow
ners
hip
rate
s ar
e ex
cept
iona
lly lo
w
(nor
mal
ly 2
5%) a
nd w
here
hou
seho
ld o
ccup
ancy
rate
s ar
e al
so lo
w
(nor
mal
ly 6
0%).
The
Ham
pshi
re C
ount
y C
ounc
il Tr
ansp
ort C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y is
in
tend
ed to
app
ly to
all
new
dev
elop
men
ts.
In R
ushm
oor i
t will
only
ap
ply
whe
re it
can
be
dem
onst
rate
d th
at th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent
will
bene
fit fr
om a
pro
pose
d hi
ghw
ay im
prov
emen
t (in
acc
orda
nce
with
Circ
ular
05/
05).
Tabl
e 5.
4H
avin
g re
gard
to th
e co
mm
ents
mad
e ab
ove
then
figu
res
quot
ed fo
r co
st p
er d
wel
ling
are
not o
nly
undu
ly o
nero
us b
ut a
lso
wou
ld re
quire
a
leve
l of f
inan
cial
con
tribu
tion
whi
ch c
lear
ly is
at o
dds
with
the
trans
port
impa
ct th
at u
ses
like
affo
rdab
le a
nd s
helte
red
affo
rdab
le h
ousi
ng w
ill
give
rise
to.
The
Ham
pshi
re C
ount
y C
ounc
il Tr
ansp
ort C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y se
eks
a co
nsis
tent
leve
l of c
ontri
butio
ns.
The
leve
l of c
ontri
butio
n w
ill al
so re
flect
the
exis
ting
use
of th
e si
te.
Tabl
e 5.
4 an
d th
e do
cum
ent i
n ge
nera
l is
insu
ffici
ently
fine
gra
ined
to
take
acc
ount
of t
hese
impo
rtant
con
side
ratio
ns.
It is
unr
easo
nabl
e to
ex
pect
a d
evel
oper
to m
ake
exce
ssiv
e fin
anci
al c
ontri
butio
ns in
pa
rticu
lar a
Reg
iste
red
Soc
ial L
andl
ord
whe
re s
uch
cont
ribut
ions
hav
e a
dire
ct e
cono
mic
effe
ct o
n th
e ab
ility
to p
rovi
de a
fford
able
hou
sing
.
The
Ham
pshi
re C
ount
y C
ounc
il Tr
ansp
ort C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y se
eks
a co
nsis
tent
leve
l of c
ontri
butio
ns a
cros
s th
e co
unty
.
Prin
cipl
e 6
Whi
lst t
his
prin
cipl
e ac
know
ledg
es th
e po
ints
mad
e ab
ove
it ne
eds
to
be re
flect
ed in
gui
danc
e at
the
begi
nnin
g of
the
docu
men
t and
mor
e pa
rticu
larly
allo
w a
det
aile
d ca
lcul
atio
n of
trip
cos
t and
tran
spor
t im
pact
to
be
calc
ulat
ed ra
ther
than
sim
ply
depe
ndin
g up
on T
able
5.4
and
fo
rcin
g th
e de
velo
per i
n ef
fect
to m
ake
a sp
ecia
l cas
e fo
r a la
nd u
se
whi
ch p
lain
ly d
oes
not h
ave
the
leve
l of i
mpa
cts
clai
med
. M
oreo
ver
the
use
of a
cos
t per
trip
use
for t
he e
mpl
oym
ent u
ses
is n
ot li
kely
to
be a
n ap
prop
riate
met
hod
for s
peci
al c
lass
es o
f res
iden
tial u
se.
Not
ed
6 H
elen
Boo
ker
Prin
cipl
e 7
To a
void
dup
licat
ion
of c
ontri
butio
ns re
late
d to
tran
spor
t wor
ks,
Fairv
iew
New
Hom
es s
eek
the
wor
ding
to b
e am
ende
d:
“The
cos
t of w
orks
ass
ocia
ted
with
Sec
tion
278
agre
emen
ts (e
ssen
tial
high
way
s w
orks
) and
Tra
vel P
lans
whi
ch p
rovi
de w
ider
pub
lic b
enef
it
The
wor
d “m
ay” h
as b
een
repl
aced
with
“will
”.
- 24
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n w
ill be
ded
ucte
d fro
m th
e ca
lcul
ated
tran
spor
t con
tribu
tion”
P
rinci
ple
9: in
line
with
Circ
ular
05/
05 tr
ansp
ort c
ontri
butio
ns s
houl
d on
ly b
e so
ught
whe
n th
ey m
eet a
ll of
the
5 te
sts
(rel
evan
t to
plan
ning
et
c)
Not
ed
FNH
thus
see
k am
ende
d w
ordi
ng a
s fo
llow
s:
“tran
spor
t con
tribu
tions
may
be
requ
ired
whe
re it
can
reas
onab
ly b
e de
mon
stra
ted
that
the
prop
osed
hig
hway
impr
ovem
ent a
re e
ssen
tial t
o th
e fu
ture
use
and
ben
efit
of th
e de
velo
pmen
t, pr
ovid
ed a
ll th
e pl
anni
ng o
blig
atio
n te
sts
set o
ut in
Circ
ular
05/
05 a
re m
et”
Com
plia
nce
with
Circ
ular
05/
05 is
alre
ady
impl
icit
in th
e S
PD
(see
P
rinci
ple
11).
FNH
add
ition
ally
requ
est t
hat t
he re
gula
rity
of th
e re
view
and
upd
ate
of
the
“Pro
pose
d H
ighw
ay Im
prov
emen
ts L
ist”
is s
et w
ithin
the
SP
D fo
r cl
arity
and
acc
ordi
ngly
sug
gest
s th
e lis
t is
revi
ewed
and
upd
ated
an
nual
ly in
con
junc
tion
with
the
annu
al S
PD re
view
.
The
perio
d of
revi
ew, “
annu
ally
” has
bee
n ad
ded
to th
e S
PD
.
Prin
cipl
e 12
: req
uest
that
the
time
perio
d sp
ecifi
ed w
ithin
the
Pla
nnin
g C
ontri
butio
ns A
gree
men
t for
the
retu
rn o
f uns
pent
con
tribu
tions
is
agre
ed a
t the
tim
e of
dra
fting
any
rele
vant
lega
l agr
eem
ent (
chan
ge
wor
ding
of p
rinci
ple
acco
rdin
gly)
.
As
it is
like
ly th
at c
ontri
butio
ns fo
r tra
nspo
rt im
prov
emen
ts w
ill ne
ed
to b
e po
oled
to e
nabl
e th
e co
llect
ion
of fu
rther
rele
vant
con
tribu
tions
it
will
be n
eces
sary
to re
tain
con
tribu
tins
for 2
0 ye
ars.
Thi
s pe
riod
will
be
used
whe
n dr
aftin
g le
gal a
gree
men
ts.
Prin
cipl
e 13
: ob
ject
to
the
min
imum
tim
e pe
riod
for
the
retu
rn o
f un
spen
t co
ntrib
utio
ns b
eing
set
as
20 y
ears
[…
] It
is c
onsi
dere
d th
at
the
spec
ific
futu
re p
rovi
sion
iden
tifie
d fo
r po
oled
con
tribu
tions
will
not
exte
nd t
o a
perio
d lo
nger
tha
n 20
yea
rs;
and
on t
his
basi
s th
e te
xt
shou
ld b
e am
ende
d as
follo
ws:
“Im
plem
enta
tion
of
high
way
im
prov
emen
ts:
Shou
ld
plan
ned
impr
ovem
ents
nee
ded
in m
itiga
tion
of d
evel
opm
ent
not
proc
eed
as
plan
ned
then
con
tribu
tions
will
be
retu
rned
to
the
deve
lope
r. I
n th
e vi
ew o
f the
nee
d to
poo
l con
tribu
tions
to e
nabl
e th
e de
liver
y of
spe
cific
sc
hem
es th
e S
ectio
n 10
6 co
ntrib
utio
n w
ill r
equi
re th
e co
ntrib
utio
ns to
be
ret
aine
d fo
r an
agr
eed
perio
d to
be
nego
tiate
d at
the
tim
e of
dr
aftin
g an
y re
leva
nt le
gal a
gree
men
t, ha
ving
rega
rd to
tim
e pe
riod
for
each
sp
ecifi
c sc
hem
e an
d th
e cr
iteria
se
t w
ithin
pa
ragr
aph
B21
C
ircul
ar 0
5/05
”.
The
wor
ding
of P
rinci
ple
13 h
as b
een
amen
ded
to re
fer t
o th
e re
tent
ion
of c
ontri
butio
ns fo
r 20
year
s. T
his
will
also
redu
ce a
ny
unce
rtain
ty a
t the
tim
e of
dra
fting
lega
l agr
eem
ents
.
7 Ia
n M
awer
H
avin
g vi
ewed
the
docu
men
ts a
nd th
e su
ppor
ting
sust
aina
bilit
y ap
prai
sals
we
do n
ot h
ave
any
com
men
ts to
mak
e.
Not
ed.
8 Ja
mes
St
even
s 2.
2 S
tatu
s of
the
docu
men
t W
e no
te th
at th
e dr
aft S
PD
is b
ased
upo
n sa
ved
polic
ies
from
R
ushm
oor’s
Loc
al P
lan
Rev
iew
and
whi
le w
e w
elco
me
the
reas
sura
nce
in th
e pr
eced
ing
sect
ion
2.1
that
the
polic
y w
ill b
e re
view
ed a
nnua
lly a
s pa
rt of
the
Ann
ual M
onito
ring
Rep
ort,
we
wou
ld
- 25
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n al
so li
ke re
assu
ranc
e th
at th
is S
PD
will
be re
-issu
ed fo
r con
sulta
tion
once
Rus
hmoo
r has
an
adop
ted
Cor
e St
rate
gy, o
r whi
chev
er is
the
rele
vant
DPD
, to
ensu
re th
at th
e S
PD
is in
alig
nmen
t with
any
DP
D
polic
ies.
4.
2 N
atio
nal p
olic
y co
ntex
t R
egar
ding
the
box
ed t
ext
deal
ing
with
the
int
erpr
etat
ion
of C
ircul
ar
5/20
05,
a sl
ight
ly m
ore
accu
rate
int
erpr
etat
ion
wou
ld r
ead
that
the
po
olin
g of
con
tribu
tions
is
perm
issi
ble
only
so
long
as
the
colle
cted
m
onie
s ar
e us
ed to
pro
vide
infra
stru
ctur
e th
at r
elat
es to
an
indi
vidu
al
site
, or
colle
ctio
n of
ass
ocia
ted
deve
lopm
ents
. Obl
igat
ions
sho
uld
not
be u
sed
to s
uppo
rt th
e de
liver
y of
mor
e ge
nera
lised
ser
vice
s ac
ross
th
e bo
roug
h. T
his
wou
ld, w
e w
ould
sug
gest
, in
clud
e co
ntrib
utio
ns to
m
aint
ain
the
‘wid
er tr
ansp
ort n
etw
ork’
as
Ham
pshi
re’s
Loc
al T
rans
port
Pla
n en
deav
ours
to
do.
As
para
grap
h B
9 of
Circ
ular
5/2
005
stat
es,
pool
ed c
ontri
butio
ns c
anno
t be
used
to “r
esol
ve e
xist
ing
defic
ienc
ies
in
infra
stru
ctur
e pr
ovis
ion”
. Th
is i
s po
ssib
ly a
min
or p
oint
sin
ce t
he
Cou
ncil
appe
ars
to h
ave
refle
cted
this
prin
cipl
e el
sew
here
in th
e dr
aft
docu
men
t in
its
app
roac
h to
its
tow
n ce
ntre
and
urb
an e
xten
sion
S
PD
s, b
ut p
erha
ps th
is p
oint
sho
uld
be c
larif
ied
and,
if n
eces
sary
, the
gu
idan
ce i
n th
e bo
x am
ende
d to
ref
lect
thi
s im
porta
nt p
rinci
ple
of
Circ
ular
5/2
005?
Prin
cipl
e 9
conf
irms
that
tran
spor
t con
tribu
tions
will
onl
y be
use
d fo
r im
prov
emen
ts w
hen
the
deve
lopm
ent w
ill be
nefit
from
them
. P
rinci
ple
11 a
lso
conf
irms
that
the
cont
ribut
ion
will
be
allo
cate
d to
sc
hem
es o
r im
prov
emen
ts (o
r con
tribu
tions
to s
ecur
e th
e pr
ovis
ion
of b
us s
ervi
ces
for u
p to
5 y
ears
– a
s am
ende
d) in
acc
orda
nce
with
C
ircul
ar 0
5/05
.
4.5
Loca
l pol
icy
cont
ext
Pol
icy
IMP
1 of
Rus
hmoo
r’s L
ocal
Pla
n R
evie
w (2
000)
sta
tes
that
site
s of
ove
r 1 h
ecta
re w
ill be
liab
le to
con
tribu
te to
war
ds in
frast
ruct
ure,
yet
th
e H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
Tran
spor
t Con
tribu
tions
Pol
icy,
upo
n w
hich
this
dra
ft S
PD
is in
par
t bas
ed, s
eeks
con
tribu
tions
from
all
deve
lopm
ents
of a
sin
gle
unit
upw
ards
. We
are
a lit
tle u
ncle
ar a
nd
wou
ld w
elco
me
clar
ifica
tion
if it
is th
e in
tent
ion
of th
e C
ounc
il to
app
ly
a th
resh
old?
Or h
ave
we
sim
ply
mis
read
this
?
It is
pro
pose
d to
follo
w th
e H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
Tran
spor
t C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y fo
r dev
elop
men
ts o
f a s
ingl
e un
it up
war
ds w
ith
no th
resh
old.
9 Jo
anne
Cha
u H
A s
uppo
rts th
e us
e of
Pla
nnin
g C
ontri
butio
ns S
PD
to p
rovi
de
inte
grat
ed tr
ansp
ort s
olut
ions
. N
oted
.
HA
is c
once
rned
that
con
tribu
tions
col
lect
ed a
re fo
r loc
al tr
ansp
ort
inte
rven
tions
onl
y an
d do
not
allo
w fo
r miti
gatio
n of
impa
cts
on th
e S
trate
gic
Roa
d N
etw
ork
(SR
N).
Circ
ular
02/
2007
sta
tes
that
: “Im
prov
emen
ts re
quire
d to
miti
gate
the
impa
ct o
f tra
ffic
gene
rate
d by
de
velo
pmen
ts w
ill al
so n
eed
to a
ddre
ss a
ny e
xist
ing
issu
es a
t tha
t lo
catio
n, u
nles
s th
e A
genc
y al
read
y ha
s a
firm
com
mitm
ent t
o do
so”
.
The
wor
ding
of P
rinci
ple
8 ha
s be
en a
men
ded
to in
clud
e re
fere
nce
to th
e po
tent
ial f
or c
ontri
butio
ns to
the
stra
tegi
c ro
ad n
etw
ork
(if
iden
tifie
d th
roug
h Tr
ansp
ort A
sses
smen
ts).
Any
exi
stin
g pr
oble
ms
on th
e S
RN
whi
ch w
ill b
e ex
acer
bate
d fu
rther
as
a re
sult
of th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent,
will
nee
d to
be
plan
ned
for
- 26
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n th
roug
h th
e LD
F pr
oces
s. T
here
fore
, the
HA
wou
ld li
ke to
see
the
SP
D s
treng
then
ed to
ens
ure
safe
and
effi
cien
t ope
ratio
n of
the
SR
N is
no
t com
prom
ised
by
any
deve
lopm
ent a
nd o
r dev
elop
men
ts.
We
sugg
est t
hat P
rinci
ple
8 (T
rans
port
Ass
essm
ents
) is
amen
ded
to
incl
ude
the
belo
w o
r any
wor
ding
s w
ith a
sim
ilar e
ffect
: “T
rans
port
Ass
essm
ent (
TA):
Tran
spor
t Ass
essm
ents
will
still
be
requ
ired
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith n
atio
nal g
uida
nce
in G
uida
nce
on
trans
port
Ass
essm
ent (
DfT
, Mar
ch 2
007)
and
Circ
ular
02/
2007
P
lann
ing
and
the
Stra
tegi
c R
oad
Net
wor
k to
ass
ess
the
impa
ct a
nd
acce
ptab
ility
of n
ew d
evel
opm
ent p
ropo
sals
.
Sho
uld
this
ass
essm
ent i
dent
ify a
ny im
pact
on
the
loca
l or s
trate
gic
high
way
net
wor
k th
at w
ill no
t be
rem
edie
d by
mea
sure
s (a
s lis
ted
on
the
Cou
ncil’s
web
site
at w
ww
.rush
moo
r.gov
.uk/
high
way
impr
ovem
ents
) t
o be
del
iver
ed th
roug
h P
lann
ing
Con
tribu
tions
, fur
ther
mea
sure
s sp
ecifi
c to
the
deve
lopm
ent(s
) mus
t be
prov
ided
and
fund
ed b
y th
e de
velo
per(s
) to
miti
gate
thei
r im
pact
”.
It
shou
ld b
e no
ted
that
the
Gov
ernm
ent i
s cr
eatin
g ne
w C
omm
unity
In
frast
ruct
ure
Levy
pow
ers
in th
e P
lann
ing
Bill
, whi
ch h
as ju
st b
egun
its
pas
sage
thro
ugh
the
com
mitt
ee s
tage
. It
is a
ntic
ipat
ed th
at lo
cal
plan
ning
aut
horit
ies
will
be
able
to ta
ke a
dvan
tage
of t
hese
pow
ers
from
Spr
ing
2009
. Th
e C
ounc
il m
ay w
ish
to m
ake
refe
renc
e to
thes
e ne
w p
ower
s in
the
SP
D.
Not
ed
10
Pete
r M
unne
lly
Com
men
ts m
ade
on b
ehal
f of o
wne
rs o
f Prin
ces
Mea
d S
hopp
ing
Cen
tre w
ithin
Far
nbor
ough
Tow
n C
entre
, who
are
abo
ut to
see
k re
deve
lopm
ent a
nd re
furb
ishm
ent o
f the
sho
ppin
g ce
ntre
, whi
ch w
ill in
clud
e ex
tend
ing
onto
adj
oini
ng la
nd p
rese
ntly
use
d as
a c
ar p
ark.
Con
text
not
ed.
Prin
cipl
e 4:
The
pro
pose
d fin
anci
al v
alue
s pe
r tri
p ap
pear
to m
ake
no
dist
inct
ion
betw
een
sust
aina
bly-
orie
nted
res
iden
tial d
evel
opm
ent
(i.e.
ca
r-fre
e sc
hem
es).
Alth
ough
it is
ack
now
ledg
ed t
hat
such
sch
emes
m
ay p
lace
add
ition
al p
ress
ure
on lo
cal p
ublic
tra
nspo
rt in
frast
ruct
ure
and
shou
ld
ther
efor
e at
tract
a
cont
ribut
ion
to
impr
ove
such
in
frast
ruct
ure,
res
iden
tial
deve
lopm
ent
trans
port
cont
ribut
ions
sho
uld
be s
usta
inab
ly i
ncen
tivis
ed.
In a
dditi
on t
he m
ulti-
mod
al t
rip r
ates
do
not t
ake
acco
unt o
f the
diff
eren
t typ
es o
f ten
ure
that
may
be
requ
ired
by th
e C
ounc
il (i.
e. p
rivat
e, e
ssen
tial r
ente
d sh
ared
equ
ity e
tc).
The
finan
cial
val
ues
have
bee
n de
term
ined
by
the
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
and
seek
to a
pply
an
aver
age
and
cons
iste
nt ra
te a
cros
s th
e co
unty
.
Prin
cipl
e 5:
tabl
e 5.
5 sh
ould
cle
arly
con
firm
whi
ch ty
pe o
f flo
orsp
ace
mea
sure
men
t it w
ill ba
se a
ny c
alcu
latio
n on
(i.e
. GLA
, GE
A e
tc).
Ref
eren
ce to
Gro
ss E
xter
nal A
rea
(GE
A) h
as b
een
adde
d.
Prin
cipl
e 7-
in a
dditi
on to
sec
tion
278
agre
emen
ts id
entif
ying
wor
ks
requ
ired
to a
cces
s th
e si
te, a
gree
men
ts s
houl
d al
so id
entif
y w
orks
w
hich
will
miti
gate
the
impa
ct o
f any
dev
elop
men
t. T
he c
ost o
f the
se
wor
ks s
houl
d be
ded
ucte
d fro
m a
ny fi
nal c
ontri
butio
n. A
ny re
duct
ions
Prin
cipl
e 7
stat
es th
at s
uch
wor
ks w
ill b
e de
duct
ed fr
om th
e ca
lcul
ated
tran
spor
t con
tribu
tion.
- 27
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n sh
ould
als
o in
clud
e se
ctio
n 38
wor
ks a
nd w
alka
way
agr
eem
ent w
orks
w
here
ben
efits
are
pro
vide
d to
the
wid
er p
ublic
.
P
rinci
ple
13: T
he m
inim
um 2
0 ye
ar p
erio
d fo
r ret
entio
n of
poo
led
cont
ribut
ions
is c
onsi
dere
d ex
cess
ivel
y lo
ng a
nd s
houl
d be
si
gnifi
cant
ly re
duce
d.
In o
rder
to b
e ab
le to
poo
l con
tribu
tions
for p
art f
undi
ng s
chem
es
this
is c
onsi
dere
d to
be
nece
ssar
y.
The
list o
f sch
emes
will
refle
ct tr
ansp
ort n
eeds
for t
he lo
cal a
rea
aim
ed a
t miti
gatin
g th
e ef
fect
of t
raffi
c as
soci
ated
with
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd im
prov
ing
acce
ss to
alte
rnat
ive
mod
es o
f tra
nspo
rt to
the
car f
or e
xist
ing
and
new
resi
dent
s an
d bu
sine
sses
to th
e ar
ea.
11
Ric
hard
Eva
ns
Tran
spor
t Dra
ft S
PD
. Whi
lst w
e S
UP
PO
RT
the
gene
ral a
ppro
ach
to
Tran
spor
t Pla
nnin
g O
blig
atio
ns a
nd th
e pr
inci
ples
of q
ualif
ying
de
velo
pmen
t, w
e ar
e le
ss c
lear
on
the
abou
t the
con
tribu
tions
from
R
ushm
oor T
own
Cen
tre s
chem
es to
tran
spor
t im
prov
emen
ts w
hich
as
sist
with
gen
eral
con
gest
ion
with
in th
e B
lack
wat
er V
alle
y. W
e ha
ve
acce
ssed
the
List
of S
chem
es m
entio
ned
in th
e S
PD
(Sec
tion
6 A
lloca
tion
of F
unds
) - lo
cate
d on
the
Han
tsW
eb. T
he L
ist d
oes
not
seem
to in
clud
e an
y qu
alify
ing
sche
mes
for A
lder
shot
/Far
nbor
ough
- ei
ther
maj
or o
r min
or s
chem
es?
We
ther
efor
e as
sum
e it
is le
ft to
in
divi
dual
tow
n ce
ntre
and
oth
er d
evel
opm
ent s
chem
es in
Rus
hmoo
r to
brin
g fo
rwar
d th
eir o
wn
impr
ovem
ents
, whi
ch m
ay h
ave
bene
fits
on
the
wid
er n
etw
ork
with
in th
e B
lack
wat
er V
alle
y. W
e w
ould
SU
PP
OR
T an
inte
grat
ed a
ppro
ach
to s
uch
cont
ribut
ions
to a
chie
ve tr
ansp
ort
impr
ovem
ents
with
in th
e Va
lley.
12
R
ob L
ane
I can
't fin
d de
tails
of t
he h
ighw
ay im
prov
emen
ts in
thos
e do
cum
ents
.
We
did
take
a c
onsc
ious
dec
isio
n no
t to
incl
ude
the
list o
f hig
hway
im
prov
emen
ts w
hen
cons
ultin
g on
the
draf
t SP
D.
The
reas
on fo
r th
is is
to c
once
ntra
te th
e co
nsul
tatio
n on
to th
e pr
inci
ple
of c
olle
ctin
g de
velo
pmen
t con
tribu
tions
for t
his
purp
ose
and
the
met
hod
of s
o do
ing.
The
list
of i
mpr
ovem
ents
will
als
o be
a c
ontin
ually
upd
ated
do
cum
ent w
hich
we
inte
nd to
repo
rt to
a jo
int R
ushm
oor a
nd
Ham
pshi
re P
anel
. Th
e dr
aft l
ist t
hat w
e ha
ve a
t pre
sent
incl
udes
sch
emes
that
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
to s
uppo
rt to
wn
cent
re S
PD
s, h
ighw
ay im
prov
emen
ts
to s
uppo
rt S
choo
l Tra
vel P
lans
(inc
ludi
ng fo
otw
ay a
nd c
ycle
way
im
prov
emen
ts) a
s w
ell a
s hi
ghw
ay im
prov
emen
t sch
emes
requ
ired
for t
he A
lder
shot
Urb
an E
xten
sion
.
1.
Wha
t are
a(s)
of t
he c
ount
ry w
ere
used
to d
eriv
e th
e tri
p ra
tes
usin
g N
TS d
ata?
To a
nsw
er y
our s
peci
fic q
uest
ions
I ne
ed to
firs
tly c
larif
y th
at o
ur
SP
D is
to e
nabl
e R
ushm
oor t
o im
plem
ent a
cou
ntyw
ide
polic
y th
at
has
alre
ady
been
ado
pted
by
Ham
pshi
re.
It w
as c
onsi
dere
d im
porta
nt fo
r the
cou
nty
that
ther
e is
a c
onsi
sten
t pol
icy
appl
ied
acro
ss H
amps
hire
so
it do
es fo
llow
that
the
ques
tions
that
you
as
k re
late
to th
e m
etho
dolo
gy e
mpl
oyed
by
the
coun
ty c
ounc
il. I
can
th
ough
ans
wer
the
poin
ts th
at y
ou ra
ise.
Th
e tri
p ra
tes
are
from
the
Nat
iona
l Tra
vel S
urve
y st
atis
tics
base
d up
on N
atio
nal T
rans
port
Sta
tistic
s in
200
6, th
e co
unty
refe
r to
them
- 28
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n as
bei
ng "N
atio
nal t
rans
port
Tren
d st
atis
tics,
whe
re p
ossi
ble
spec
ific
to th
e ch
arac
teris
tics
of H
amps
hire
".
2.
Can
you
pro
vide
det
ails
of t
he c
ost d
ata
used
. Num
ber o
f cas
es in
R
ushm
oor,
no. o
f cas
es in
han
ts, r
ange
of c
osts
per
uni
t of d
wel
ling
etc.
The
cost
dat
a us
ed is
pro
duce
d fro
m a
sam
ple
of tr
ansp
ort
miti
gatio
n pa
ckag
es a
t a v
arie
ty o
f site
s ac
ross
the
coun
ty, (
the
site
s us
ed w
ere
Pic
ket T
wen
ty M
DA
in A
ndov
er, B
arto
n Fa
rm in
W
inch
este
r, Q
ueen
Eliz
abet
h B
arra
cks
in C
hurc
h C
rook
ham
and
the
Wes
t of W
ater
loov
ille M
DA
nea
r Hav
ant).
A c
alcu
latio
n of
the
estim
ated
num
ber o
f mul
ti-m
odal
trip
s to
the
cost
s of
the
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
gave
an
aver
age
cost
of £
534
per r
esid
entia
l mul
ti-m
odal
tri
p.
It is
cer
tain
ly e
xpec
ted
that
the
trans
port
cont
ribut
ions
will
incl
ude
all
mod
es o
f tra
nspo
rt.
3.
Is it
inte
nded
that
the
cont
ribut
ions
will
be a
pplie
d to
all
mod
es
incl
udin
g pu
blic
tran
spor
t?
The
mai
n de
partu
re fo
r Rus
hmoo
r fro
m th
e co
unty
pol
icy
is to
en
sure
that
we
have
a m
etho
d to
dem
onst
rate
tran
spar
ency
and
co
nsis
tenc
y w
ith C
ircul
ar 0
5/20
05 b
y re
quiri
ng c
ontri
butio
ns w
here
w
e ha
ve id
entif
ied
mea
sure
s th
at w
ill be
dire
ctly
rela
ted
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
that
are
nec
essa
ry to
mak
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t ac
cept
able
in p
lann
ing
term
s. T
he p
rinci
ple
of h
avin
g a
list o
f im
prov
emen
ts w
ill b
e a
mai
n pa
rt of
this
and
ena
ble
us to
mon
itor
that
mon
ies
colle
cted
are
onl
y us
ed fo
r the
pur
pose
s fo
r whi
ch th
ey
wer
e co
llect
ed.
13
Ros
e Fr
eem
an
We
have
no
com
men
t on
this
doc
umen
t as
it is
not
with
in o
ur re
mit
but
look
forw
ard
to b
eing
con
sulte
d on
Pla
nnin
g O
blig
atio
ns fo
r C
omm
unity
Fac
ilitie
s.
Res
pons
e no
ted.
14
Step
hen
Foxc
roft
The
term
‘mul
ti-m
odal
trip
’ is
used
to id
entif
y a
cont
ribut
ion
per t
rip fo
r re
si (£
535)
and
non
-res
i (£2
30) t
rips.
Doe
s th
is m
ean
the
cont
ribut
ion
will
be c
alcu
late
d ag
ains
t eac
h tw
o-w
ay tr
ip?
(i.e.
: eac
h tri
p co
nsis
ts o
f an
out
boun
d jo
urne
y an
d an
inbo
und
jour
ney)
or a
gain
st e
ach
indi
vidu
al tr
ip?
(i.e.
: one
out
boun
d tri
p an
d on
e in
boun
d tri
p w
ould
co
unt a
s tw
o tri
ps a
nd in
cur t
wo
times
the
per t
rip c
ontri
butio
n).
The
term
mul
ti-m
odal
trip
and
the
calc
ulat
ion
of "v
alue
" has
bee
n ar
rived
at b
y th
e C
ount
y C
ounc
il. I
t is
my
unde
rsta
ndin
g th
at th
e co
ntrib
utio
n w
ill b
e co
unte
d as
a tw
o w
ay tr
ip.
15
Sue
Jano
ta
The
Ass
embl
y w
elco
mes
the
com
preh
ensi
ve a
ppro
ach
take
n in
bot
h th
ese
docu
men
ts a
nd h
as n
o sp
ecifi
c co
mm
ents
to m
ake.
N
oted
.
16
Rob
Lan
e Th
e pr
oduc
tion
of th
is S
PD
is w
elco
med
as
it sh
ould
pro
vide
cle
ar
guid
ance
to d
evel
oper
s, b
e fa
ir to
all
and
ensu
re th
at th
e im
pact
s on
th
e tra
nspo
rt sy
stem
due
to d
evel
opm
ents
are
am
elio
rate
d by
the
prov
isio
n of
app
ropr
iate
infra
stru
ctur
e
Sup
port
note
d
It is
und
erst
ood
that
the
draf
t is
base
d on
a c
ount
ywid
e S
PD
pre
pare
d by
the
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil.
It d
oes
not f
ollo
w th
at th
e C
ount
y sc
hem
e ha
s to
be
adop
ted
by R
BC
with
out a
ltera
tion.
It i
s th
e LP
A’s
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Rus
hmoo
r is
the
plan
ning
aut
horit
y an
d ha
s pr
epar
ed th
e dr
aft S
PD
in
resp
onse
to H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
who
are
the
high
way
au
thor
ity fo
r the
Rus
hmoo
r are
a. T
he S
PD is
diff
eren
t in
seve
ral
- 29
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n to
ent
er in
to p
lann
ing
agre
emen
ts a
nd to
dev
elop
app
ropr
iate
pol
icie
s fo
r con
tribu
tions
. R
ushm
oor i
s su
ffici
ently
larg
e en
ough
are
a to
hav
e its
ow
n po
licie
s an
d it
wou
ld in
any
eve
nt b
e be
tter t
o ha
ve a
co
nsis
tent
pol
icy
with
its
neig
hbou
rs in
the
Bla
ckw
ater
Val
ley
than
with
m
uch
rem
ote
parts
of t
he C
ount
y.
The
SP
D a
s it
stan
ds d
oes
not c
ompl
y w
ith C
ircul
ar 0
5.20
05 o
r the
P
ract
ice
Gui
danc
e pu
blis
hed
in 2
006.
The
doc
umen
t is
ther
efor
e fu
ndam
enta
lly fl
awed
for t
he re
ason
s st
ated
bel
ow:
aspe
cts
to th
e H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
Tran
spor
t Con
tribu
tions
P
olic
y in
par
ticul
ar th
at it
will
be
appl
ied
only
whe
re a
dev
elop
men
t m
ay b
e lin
ked
to a
tran
spor
t im
prov
emen
t nee
d id
entif
ied
in th
e pu
blis
hed
list o
f im
prov
emen
ts.
The
diffi
culty
with
the
SP
D a
s pr
opos
ed is
that
it m
ay w
ell n
ot c
ompl
y w
ith th
e th
ird te
st (o
f Circ
ular
05/
2005
), “d
irect
ly re
late
d to
the
prop
osed
dev
elop
men
t”. T
he re
ason
for s
ayin
g th
is is
the
dist
ribut
ion
of re
side
ntia
l dev
elop
men
t lik
ely
to o
ccur
in th
e bo
roug
h. T
he v
ery
larg
e ex
pans
ion
of A
lder
shot
sho
uld
have
its
own
infra
stru
ctur
e re
quire
men
ts m
et b
y th
e co
ntrib
utio
ns fo
r tha
t dev
elop
men
t. I
note
th
at th
e dr
aft l
ist o
f hig
hway
sch
emes
like
ly to
be
fund
ed v
ia th
e ne
w
SP
D in
clud
es th
ose
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e A
lder
shot
exp
ansi
on.
This
m
etho
d w
ould
be
unfa
ir on
the
man
y sm
alle
r dev
elop
men
ts in
the
boro
ugh
and
ther
efor
e do
es n
ot c
ompl
y w
ith th
e “th
ird” t
est a
nd
poss
ibly
als
o th
e “fo
urth
” tes
t.
It is
a re
quire
men
t tha
t the
SP
D c
ompl
ies
with
all
of th
e te
sts
set o
ut
in C
ircul
ar 0
5/20
05. T
his
mea
ns th
at e
ach
appl
icat
ion
will
be
indi
vidu
ally
con
side
red
agai
nst t
he P
olic
y te
sts
whi
ch a
re th
at th
e co
ntrib
utio
ns re
quire
d ar
e :
i) R
elev
ant t
o pl
anni
ng
ii)
Nec
essa
ry to
mak
e th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent
acce
ptab
le in
pla
nnin
g te
rms
iii)
Dire
ctly
rela
ted
to th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent
iv)
Fairl
y an
d re
ason
ably
rela
ted
in s
cale
and
kin
d to
the
prop
osed
dev
elop
men
t; an
d v)
R
easo
nabl
e in
all
othe
r res
pect
s.
Cha
pter
5 o
f the
doc
umen
t “P
lann
ing
Obl
igat
ions
: Pra
ctic
e G
uida
nce
(200
6) s
tate
s a
num
ber o
f prin
cipl
es to
be
follo
wed
whe
n de
velo
ping
fo
rmul
ae a
nd s
tand
ard
char
ges.
It
is n
eces
sary
to e
stim
ate
the
likel
y im
pact
on
the
loca
l env
ironm
ent
and
infra
stru
ctur
e of
pro
vidi
ng a
n ad
ditio
nal d
wel
ling.
The
NTS
dat
a th
at h
as b
een
used
com
es fr
om a
sev
eral
dat
a so
urce
s an
d m
ay n
ot
be re
leva
nt to
the
Rus
hmoo
r are
a. R
esea
rch
shou
ld b
e ca
rrie
d ou
t to
iden
tify
trip
rate
s fo
r com
para
ble
urba
n ar
eas
to F
arnb
orou
gh a
nd
Ald
ersh
ot
The
Ham
pshi
re C
ount
y C
ounc
il Tr
ansp
ort C
ontri
butio
ns P
olic
y se
eks
a co
nsis
tent
con
tribu
tion
leve
l acr
oss
the
coun
ty, i
t the
refo
re
seem
s ap
prop
riate
to u
se a
nat
iona
l ave
rage
app
roac
h as
the
coun
ty h
ave
follo
wed
.
The
info
rmat
ion
prov
ided
on
the
calc
ulat
ions
for t
rans
port
cont
ribut
ions
do
es n
ot fo
llow
the
prac
tice
in th
e P
ract
ice
Gui
danc
e. T
he
asse
ssm
ents
sho
uld
be b
ased
on
the
likel
y co
st o
f pro
vidi
ng th
e in
frast
ruct
ure
need
ed b
y fu
ture
dev
elop
men
ts.
At t
he ti
me
of c
onsi
derin
g a
form
ulai
c co
ntrib
utio
n le
vel i
t is
not
poss
ible
to k
now
the
natu
re o
f dev
elop
men
t or t
he in
frast
ruct
ure
that
m
ay b
e ne
eded
. It
does
see
m re
ason
able
to b
ase
this
on
rele
vant
hi
stor
ical
info
rmat
ion
that
, whi
ch h
as b
een
used
by
the
coun
ty.
The
draf
t SP
D d
oes
not m
ake
it cl
ear t
hat t
he c
ontri
butio
ns w
ill be
ap
plie
d to
all
mod
es o
f tra
nspo
rt, in
clud
ing
publ
ic tr
ansp
ort.
It w
ould
be
bet
ter i
f the
list
of i
mpr
ovem
ents
was
ent
itled
tran
spor
t im
prov
emen
ts.
The
list s
houl
d in
clud
e th
e fo
llow
ing
mea
sure
s;
Acc
iden
t pre
vent
ion
mea
sure
s, p
edes
trian
faci
litie
s, c
ycle
faci
litie
s,
high
way
impr
ovem
ents
, pub
lic tr
ansp
ort f
acilit
ies
and
serv
ices
, tra
vel
plan
s, s
afe
rout
es to
sch
ools
, tra
vel i
nfor
mat
ion
syst
ems.
The
list o
f im
prov
emen
ts h
as b
een
chan
ged
to tr
ansp
ort
impr
ovem
ents
. Th
e lis
t of p
oten
tial s
chem
e ty
pes
will
be u
sed
whe
n dr
awin
g up
the
list o
f tra
nspo
rt im
prov
emen
ts.
17.
Adr
ian
Furn
iss
The
term
“con
tribu
tions
” app
ears
to b
e ja
rgon
and
is n
ot im
med
iate
ly
unde
rsta
ndab
le to
peo
ple
not w
ithin
the
plan
ning
/ dev
elop
men
t Th
e co
nfus
ion
with
term
inol
ogy
is n
oted
. U
nfor
tuna
tely
the
guid
ance
th
at w
e fo
llow
refe
rs to
“con
tribu
tions
” (an
d po
ssib
ly e
ven
mor
e
- 30
-
No.
N
ame
Com
men
t R
ecom
men
datio
n pr
oces
s.
At 3
.1 th
e do
cum
ent d
efin
es P
lann
ing
Con
tribu
tions
as
agre
emen
ts.
Wou
ld P
lann
ing
Agr
eem
ents
ther
efor
e be
a m
ore
accu
rate
title
for t
his
SP
D.
unhe
lpfu
l “ob
ligat
ions
”).
To re
fer t
o th
ese
as “a
gree
men
ts” i
s lik
ely
to le
ad to
furth
er c
onfu
sion
as
we
need
to h
ave
lega
l “ag
reem
ents
” in
pla
ce to
col
lect
the
“con
tribu
tions
”.
Are
“Prin
cipl
es” b
indi
ng?
Why
not
use
a s
trong
er te
rm, i
.e
“reg
ulat
ions
”. Th
e S
uppl
emen
tary
Pla
nnin
g do
cum
ent i
s a
form
of p
lann
ing
regu
latio
n. T
he u
se o
f “P
rinci
ples
” is
an a
ttem
pt to
dra
w o
ut th
e es
sent
ial r
equi
rem
ents
of t
he p
olic
y.
Sup
port
note
d.
18.
Jon
Few
ings
N
atur
al E
ngla
nd re
cogn
ises
and
sup
ports
the
gene
ral i
nten
t and
br
eadt
h of
the
docu
men
t. In
par
ticul
ar w
e ar
e en
cour
aged
to s
ee th
e do
cum
ent r
ecog
nise
s th
at a
ll de
velo
pmen
t con
side
red
deliv
erab
le o
r de
velo
pabl
e ne
eds
to re
cogn
ise
that
the
need
for t
rave
l and
tran
spor
t in
frast
ruct
ure
as p
art o
f sus
tain
able
dev
elop
men
t is
esse
ntia
l. N
atur
al
Eng
land
bel
ieve
s th
at th
ere
is a
nee
d to
ens
ure
that
cur
rent
and
futu
re
Loca
l Aut
horit
y tra
nspo
rt po
licie
s an
d as
soci
ated
infra
stru
ctur
e pr
ojec
ts c
ontri
bute
to th
e co
nser
vatio
n an
d en
hanc
emen
t of t
he n
atur
al
envi
ronm
ent.
We
seek
this
as
an e
ssen
tial p
art o
f del
iver
ing
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent.
The
UK
nee
ds a
wel
l-int
egra
ted,
affo
rdab
le
trans
port
syst
em w
ith e
ffect
ive
netw
orks
(for
inst
ance
pub
lic tr
ansp
ort,
cycl
ing
and
wal
king
) tha
t pro
vide
s a
real
istic
alte
rnat
ive
to ro
ad b
ased
tri
ps.
You
r con
sulta
tion
docu
men
t rec
ogni
ses
this
fact
. 19
. Jo
hn C
hest
on
It se
ems
that
the
cont
ent o
f the
SP
D is
con
sist
ent w
ith n
atio
nal a
nd
regi
onal
pla
nnin
g po
licy
and
GO
SE
hav
e no
furth
er c
omm
ents
to o
ffer.
Sup
port
note
d.
- 31
-
APP
END
IX V
II: L
ist o
f Res
pond
ents
No.
N
ame
Org
anis
atio
n/ A
ddre
ss
Rap
leys
LLP
M
addo
x H
ouse
, 1 M
addo
x S
treet
, Lon
don
W1S
2P
Z 1
Ann
a G
illing
s (o
n be
half
of
Wilk
y)
2 A
ndre
w H
errin
g H
amps
hire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
R
oom
18,
Cas
tle A
venu
e
Win
ches
ter,
SO
23 8
UD
3
Em
ily B
utch
er
Rus
hmoo
r Bor
ough
Cou
ncil
(inte
rnal
con
sulte
e) H
abita
ts R
egul
atio
ns
Ass
essm
ent
4 G
eral
dine
Mol
ony
Prin
cipa
l Pla
nnin
g O
ffice
r W
aver
ley
Bor
ough
Cou
ncil
5 G
rego
ry G
ray
G
rego
ry G
ray
Ass
ocia
tes
1,
Ale
xand
ra R
oad,
Fa
rnbo
roug
h,
Ham
pshi
re,
GU
14 6
BU
6
Hel
en B
ooke
r (on
beh
alf o
f Fa
irvie
w H
omes
) A
ssis
tant
Pla
nner
R
PS
Pla
nnin
g, 1
st F
loor
Wes
t, C
otto
ns C
entre
, Cot
tons
Lan
e, L
ondo
n.
SE
1 2Q
G
7 Ia
n M
awer
R
egio
nal P
lann
ing
Ass
ista
nt
SE
ED
A
Gro
ss L
anes
G
uild
ford
8
Jam
es S
teve
ns/ P
ete
Erri
ngto
n R
egio
nal P
lann
er (L
ondo
n)
Hom
e B
uild
ers
Fede
ratio
n Lt
d 1s
t Flo
or B
yron
Hou
se
7-9
St J
ames
's S
treet
Lo
ndon
SW
1A 1
DW
9
Joan
ne C
hau
Hig
hway
s A
genc
y
Net
wor
k S
trate
gy- S
outh
Eas
t Fe
dera
ted
Hou
se
Lond
on R
oad
- 32
-
No.
N
ame
Org
anis
atio
n/ A
ddre
ss
Dor
king
R
H4
1SZ
10
Pet
er M
unne
lly (o
n be
half
of
Sta
ndar
d Li
fe o
wne
rs o
f P
rince
s M
ead)
Mon
tagu
Eva
ns C
harte
red
Sur
veyo
rs
Cla
rges
Hou
se
6-12
Cla
rges
Stre
et
Lond
on W
1J 8
HB
11
R
icha
rd J
. Eva
ns
Pla
nnin
g Im
plem
enta
tion
Team
S
urre
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il 12
R
ob L
ane
13
R
ose
Free
man
P
lann
ing
Ass
ista
nt
The
Thea
tres
Trus
t 22
Cha
ring
Cro
ss R
oad,
Lon
don
WC
2H 0
QL
14
Ste
phen
Fox
crof
t W
SP
Dev
elop
men
t and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n M
ount
batte
n H
ouse
, Bas
ing
Vie
w, B
asin
gsto
ke R
G21
4H
J 15
S
ue J
anot
a
Ang
ela
Par
kes
Team
PA
S
outh
Eas
t Eng
land
Reg
iona
l Ass
embl
y
Ber
kele
y H
ouse
, Cro
ss L
anes
G
uild
ford
, Sur
rey
GU
1 1U
N
16.
Rob
Lan
e Th
e Fa
rnbo
roug
h S
ocie
ty
30 C
hurc
h C
ircle
Far
nbor
ough
H
ants
GU
14 6
17
. A
dria
n Fu
rnis
s N
etle
y an
d W
inch
este
r Stre
ets
Res
iden
ts A
ssoc
iatio
n 53
Osb
orne
Roa
d Fa
rnbo
roug
h, H
ants
GU
14 6
AP
18
. Jo
n Fe
win
gs
Nat
ural
Eng
land
, B
lock
A
Gov
ernm
ent B
uild
ings
C
oley
Par
k, R
eadi
ng B
erks
RG
1 6D
T 19
. Jo
hn C
hest
on
Gov
ernm
ent O
ffice
for t
he S
outh
Eas
t H
ousi
ng a
nd P
lann
ing
Dire
ctor
ate:
LD
F Te
am
Brid
ge H
ouse
1
Wal
nut T
ree
Clo
se, G
uild
ford
, Sur
rey
GU
14 4
GA
- 33
-
