Upload
others
View
15
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Geraldine RooneyPfizer Ireland PharamceuticalsRingaskiddy APICo Cork
Pfizer RingaskiddyGroundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Project number: 60544194CKRP0001 Issue 3
17 November 2017
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM2
Quality information
Prepared by Checked by Approved by
Brendan McCarthyEnvironmental Scientist
Edel O'HannellyPrincipal Hydrogeologist
Kevin FordeTechnical Director
Revision History
Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position
0 29 August 2017 Original Yes Kevin Forde Technical Director
1 07 August 2017 Revised Yes Kevin Forde Technical Director
2 17 November 2017 Final Yes Kevin Forde Technical Director
Distribution List
# Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name
0 1 Geraldine Rooney, Pfizer Ireland Limited, Ringaskiddy
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM3
Prepared for:Pfizer Ireland LimitedGeraldine RooneyPfizer Ireland PharamceuticalsRingaskiddy APICo Cork
Prepared by:Brendan McCarthyEnvironmental ScientistT: +353 (0)21 4365006M: +353 (0)87 1872998E: [email protected]
AECOM Ireland LimitedDouglas Business CentreCarrigaline RoadCorkIreland
T: +353 21 4536136aecom.com
© This Report is the copyright of AECOM Ireland Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any personother than the addressee is strictly prohibited.
AECOM Ireland Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Pfizer Ireland Limited(“Client”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment (ref no: OPP-617344) dated 31March 2017. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice includedin this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report may not be relied upon by anyother party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
Where any conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon informationprovided by others, it has been assumed that all relevant information has been provided by thoseparties and that such information is accurate. Any such information obtained by AECOM has not beenindependently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. AECOM accepts no liabilityfor any inaccurate conclusions, assumptions or actions taken resulting from any inaccurateinformation supplied to AECOM from others.
The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its servicesare outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between 15 May 2017and 17 May 2017 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available duringthe said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited bythese circumstances. AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of anychange in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention afterthe date of the Report.
The comments made on groundwater conditions are based on observations made during site workand the limited monitoring programme. It should be noted that groundwater levels might vary owingto seasonal or other effects.
It should be noted that the effects of ground and water borne contamination on the environment areconstantly under review, and authoritative guidance values are potentially subject to change. Theconclusions presented herein are based on the guidance values available at the time this Report wasprepared, however, no liability by AECOM can be accepted for the retrospective effects of anychanges or amendments to these values.
Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities willcontinue to be used for their current purpose without significant changes.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM4
Table of ContentsExecutive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 61. Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 9
1.1 Project Contractual Basis and Personnel Involved .......................................................... 91.2 Background Information ................................................................................................. 91.2.1 Site History .................................................................................................................... 91.2.2 Site Description and Setting ......................................................................................... 101.2.3 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 101.2.4 Bedrock Geology and Subsoils .................................................................................... 101.2.5 Hydrogeology ............................................................................................................... 111.2.6 Groundwater Flow......................................................................................................... 111.2.7 Groundwater Redox Chemistry ..................................................................................... 111.2.8 Chemicals of Potential Concern in Groundwater........................................................... 121.2.9 Source-Pathway-Receptor Linkages ............................................................................ 121.2.10Monitoring Network ...................................................................................................... 131.3 Project Objectives ........................................................................................................ 131.4 Scope of Works ........................................................................................................... 131.4.1 Sampling Methodology................................................................................................. 131.4.2 Laboratory Analyses .................................................................................................... 14
2. Results & Discussion of Monitoring Programme ..................................................................... 142.1 Site Hydrogeology and Groundwater Flow ................................................................... 142.1.1 Water Quality Parameters ............................................................................................ 142.1.2 Groundwater Flow Pattern ........................................................................................... 152.1.3 Field Observations ....................................................................................................... 152.2 Laboratory Results ....................................................................................................... 152.2.1 Assessment Guidelines ................................................................................................ 152.2.2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ........................................................................... 162.2.3 Alcohols and Other Dissolved Organics ....................................................................... 172.2.4 Dissolved Heavy Metals ............................................................................................... 172.2.5 Major Ions .................................................................................................................... 182.3 Temporal Trends of Chemical of Potential Concern ...................................................... 192.4 Review of Solvent Mass Recovery ............................................................................... 192.5 Conceptual Site Model ................................................................................................. 202.5.1 Hydraulic Containment ................................................................................................. 202.5.2 Potential Pollutant Linkages ......................................................................................... 21
3. Summary, Conclusions and Recommended Way Forward...................................................... 223.1 Summary and Conclusion ............................................................................................ 223.2 Recommended Way Forward ....................................................................................... 23
FiguresTablesAppendix A - Historical Data and Concentration Plots with Time for Key Compounds (Figures A1
– A11)Appendix B - Laboratory Certificates
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM5
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location PlanFigure 2 – Site Layout Showing Monitoring Well LocationsFigure 3 – Drift Groundwater Contour MapFigure 4 – Bedrock Groundwater Contour MapFigure 5 – Total VOC Concentration Trends in Wells 205 and 501 from May 2005 to May 2017Figure 6 – BTEX Concentration Trends in Wells 205 and 501 from May 2005 to May 2017Figure 7 – Solvent Mass Recovery
List of TablesTable 1 – Monitoring InventoryTable 2 – Well InventoryTable 3 – Field NotesTable 4 – Groundwater ElevationsTable 5 – Volatile Organic CompoundsTable 6 – Alcohols and Other OrganicsTable 7 – MetalsTable 8 – Major Ions
Appendix A – Appendix A - Historical Data and Concentration Plots with Time for KeyCompounds (Figures A1 – A11)
Appendix B – Laboratory Certificates
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM6
Executive SummaryThe first groundwater monitoring round for 2017 was conducted by AECOM between 15 - 17 May 2017 atPfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals API plant (Pfizer Ringaskiddy), Ballintaggart, Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork. Themonitoring was completed in accordance with requirements of the site’s Industrial Emissions Licence (IEL)and is reported in accordance with Stage 1 – Stage 3 of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Guidance onthe Management of Contaminated Land and Groundwater at EPA Licensed Sites, July 2013.
Groundwater was sampled from the seven monitoring wells required in the IEL and analysed for the followingparameters:
· Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
· Alcohols
· Dissolved heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, zinc and mercury)
· Ammoniacal-nitrogen
· Major ions (chloride, potassium, sodium, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, sulphate, nitrate, nitrite, magnesiumand calcium)
· Carbonate, bicarbonate and total alkalinity
· Ionic balance
In general, the groundwater flow pattern and long term declining solvent trends have remained consistent atPfizer Ringaskiddy for several years and can be summarised as follows:
· Groundwater flow direction in both the subsoil and bedrock aquifers is in an eastward direction acrossthe western portion of the site. Moving further east, groundwater in the bedrock aquifer is contained inan area north of the nature pond by groundwater abstraction from two containment wells, C1 and C2. Itis understood from historical data that under natural gradient conditions groundwater flow wasnorthward in this area towards Monkstown Creek.
· A general overall declining trend in solvent concentrations has been evident in groundwater from the IELmonitored wells at Pfizer Ringaskiddy since the mid-1990s.
· Solvent mass recovery, as a result of groundwater abstraction from wells C1 and C2 (and historicallyfrom other wells), has followed an overall trend of decreasing mass loads over time. This is attributed toa combination of engineering up-grades, removal of source contaminants and groundwater abstractionitself. Ongoing natural attenuation of dissolved solvent concentrations along the groundwater pathwaydown-gradient of the source area has also reduced the overall mass recovered.
Conclusions from Round 1 May 2017 monitoring round are:
· No floating/sinking non-aqueous phase liquid layer was detected in any of the monitoring wells dipped.
· Total VOC concentrations in May 2017 were generally stable compared to November 2016, increasingslightly in groundwater from three wells.
· The THF concentration increased in groundwater from well 501 between November 2016 and May2017, from below the MDL to 0.04mg/L. THF also increased in groundwater from well C1 betweenNovember 2016 and May 2017, from 0.011 mg/L in November 2016 to 0.14 mg/L in May 2017. The THFconcentration decreased in groundwater from well 404 (from 0.062 mg/L in November 2016 to0.052 mg/L in May 2017). THF remained below the MDL in groundwater from wells 7, 205, 409 and 702.
· Alcohols and acetone were below detection in groundwater from all seven IEL monitoring wells in May2017.
· Cyclohexane was detected in groundwater from one well, 501 (0.36 mg/L) in May 2017 decreasing froma concentration of 1.8 mg/L in November 2016. Cyclohexane remained below MDL in the remaining sixwells.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM7
· In 2015, leaks were identified in two weak effluent manholes CS116 and CS124 located up-stream ofwell 501. Repairs to the manholes were completed in February 2016, with both manholes passingEN1610 pressure testing. Decreases in alcohol concentrations in both 2016 rounds and Round 1 2017are confirmation that repairs to the manholes have been successful.
· All licensed monitoring wells appeared to be in good condition during fieldwork and do not require repairor maintenance.
Ireland Contaminated Land/Groundwater Framework
Stage 1: Site Characterisation and Assessment
Framework Stage AECOM Report ReferenceReportDate Status
1.1 Preliminary SiteAssessment
Groundwater Monitoring URS, ReportReference 17717-013-401
December1993
Unknown
1.2 Site Characterisation Phase II Soil and Groundwater Investigation,Report Reference 17717-015-401
August1994
Final
1.2 Site Characterisation Phase III Groundwater Investigation, ReportReference 17717-018-401
May 1995 Final
1.2 Site Characterisation Additional Site Investigation (OSP 1 Plant),Report Reference 17717-028-401
1997 Unknown
1.2 Site Characterisation Trial Pit Soil Investigation (OSP 4 Plant),Report Reference 17717-040
March 1998 Final
1.2 Site Characterisation OSP 4 Groundwater Investigation, ReportReference 17717-041
April 1998 Final
1.2 Site Characterisation UST Tank Farm Investigation, ReportReference 17717-044
August1998
Final
1.3 Quantitative RiskAssessment
Controlled Water Quantitative RiskAssessment, Report Reference 45078513
October2006
Final
Stage 2: Corrective Action Feasibility and Outline Design
Framework Stage AECOM Report Reference ReportDate
Status
2.1 Outline CorrectiveAction Strategy
Proposal Reference PRP328 May 1998 Final
2.2 Feasibility Study &Outline Design
Remedial Investigation and ProductRecovery, Report Reference 17717-045
November1998
Final
2.3.1 Detailed Design Remedial Investigation and ProductRecovery, Report Reference 17717-045
November1998
Final
2.3.2 Detailed Design Shallow Limestone CharacterisationProgramme and Product Recovery SystemDesign, Report Reference 17717-075
July 2000(RC area)
Draft
2.4 Final Strategy andImplementation Plan
Phase III Groundwater Investigation, ReportReference 17717-018-401 (ContainmentWells)
May 1995 Final
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM8
Ireland Contaminated Land/Groundwater Framework
2.2 Feasibility Study &Outline Design
Remediation Assessment 2014, Reference47092735/CKRP0001
February2015
Final
Stage 3: Corrective Action Implementation and Aftercare
Framework Stage AECOM Report Reference ReportDate
Status
3.1 Enabling Works - - -
3.2 Corrective ActionImplementation &Verification
Remedial Investigation and ProductRecovery, Report Reference 17717-045
November1998
Unknown
3.3 Aftercare
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM9
1. Introduction
1.1 Project Contractual Basis and Personnel Involved
AECOM Ireland Limited (AECOM) was engaged by Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals (Pfizer Ringaskiddy) toconduct groundwater monitoring at their API plant, Ballintaggart, Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork (the site) in May2017. The work was undertaken in accordance with AECOM Proposal OPP-617344/CKRP0001, dated 31March 2017 and authorised by Pfizer under their purchase order number 8501496689.
The AECOM team for Round 1 May 2017 comprised the following:
· Project Director: Kevin Forde, Technical Director
· Project Manager: Edel O’Hannelly, Principal Hydrogeologist
· Data Assessment and Reporting: Brendan McCarthy, Environmental Scientist
· Field Scientists: , Brendan McCarthy and Dan O’Leary, Environmental Scientists
Laboratory analysis of samples was subcontracted to Exova Jones Environmental Limited, Deeside, U.K., anAECOM-approved laboratory with UKAS accreditation.
1.2 Background Information
The site is located in Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork. A site location map is presented in Figure 1.
Pfizer Ringaskiddy is a large, multipurpose manufacturer of new and existing active pharmaceuticalingredients and their intermediates. The plant in Ringaskiddy comprises three main production buildings,one active pharmaceutical ingredient milling plant: associated site utilities and storage facilities. A site plan ispresented in Figure 2.
The site operates under an Industrial Emissions Licence (IEL) issued by the Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA), IEL number P0013-04 (originally issued as an IPC licence in May 1995).
Under Condition 6 and Schedule C.6 of the licence, biannual groundwater monitoring is required frommonitoring wells: 7, 205, 404, 409, 501, 702 and hydraulic containment well C1. Well 3 was originally part ofthe site’s groundwater monitoring requirements, but was decommissioned in 2007 with EPA approval.
1.2.1 Site History
The parcel of land which includes the current Pfizer Ringaskiddy facility was a greenfield site until 1969,when construction work on the Pfizer Ringaskiddy citric acid plant began. Pfizer Ringaskiddy began citricacid production at the site in 1971 (the citric acid plant was later sold to Archer Daniels Midlands (ADM) in1990 and continued operating until 2005).
Pharmaceutical production at Ringaskiddy commenced in 1972. Since then, there has been on-goingdevelopment of the plant, with the construction of new buildings and expansion of existing buildings, up-grading of facilities and addition of new facilities. Three major expansion projects, completed in 1984, 1994,and 2001, added significantly to pharmaceutical production capacity at the site.
Towards the end of 2007, Pfizer Ringaskiddy ceased manufacturing activities in Organic Synthesis Plant(OSP) 2, as part of a business rationalisation plan to eliminate excess production capacity. The physicalbuilding infrastructure has been retained and a section of it has been refurbished as the New ProductTechnology Laboratory, NPTL, which was officially opened in May 2014.
The former ADM facility was located immediately to the west of the Pfizer Ringaskiddy plant and wasdecommissioned and dismantled by Corrin MDA in 2006-2007. The IPPC licence for the ADM site (P0053-01, which was held by Corrin MDA) was surrendered in September 2007, following completion of the sitedecommissioning and a successful exit audit carried out by the EPA.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM10
Pfizer (Pfizer Biotechnology Ireland, PBI) subsequently constructed a small scale biologics facility in theundeveloped western portion of the former ADM facility. The PBI facility was separate from the existing PfizerRingaskiddy site and operated under a separate IEL, P0864-01. In 2011; the PBI facility was sold to BioMarinManufacturing Ireland, now known as BioMarin International Limited.
1.2.2 Site Description and Setting
The Pfizer Ringaskiddy landholding comprises approximately 21 hectares on the southern shore ofMonkstown Creek in Cork Harbour, approximately 11 km southeast of Cork City, see Figure 1.
The site has a relatively steep topographic gradient, with ground on the western portion of the site (OSP 1) atapproximately 15 metres above Ordnance Datum (m OD) sloping towards Monkstown Creek and the greaterCork Harbour area (~400 – 500 m away) to the north and east.
Land use in the vicinity of the site is a mix of industrial and agricultural, as summarised below:
· North and East – Monkstown Creek (an inlet of Cork Harbour and a proposed national heritage area(pNHA)) and the greater Cork Harbour area (a designated special protection area (SPA)) are locatednorth and east of the site. Ringaskiddy Deep Water Terminal borders the site to the east, withRingaskiddy village some 800 m southeast of the site.
· South – The N28 national primary road runs east-west along the southern site boundary. IDA-ownedland, currently in agricultural use, is present to the south of the N28, with Janssen Biologics (formerlyCentocor) located 470 m to the south of the Pfizer OSP4 building and with the Novartis RingaskiddyLimited active pharmaceutical ingredient facility 750 m to the south.
· West – BioMarin International Limited, with the Raffeen Creek Sports Club lands (owned by Pfizer)further to the west. Shanbally village is located 750 m west of the site boundary.
1.2.3 Hydrology
The site is bounded to the north and east by an estuary known as Monkstown Creek, which is a tidal inletlocated on the western side of Cork Harbour. Coastal and estuarine water quality in Cork Harbour isclassified as ‘unpolluted’ by the EPA1.
There are no other surface water features in the vicinity of the site.
1.2.4 Bedrock Geology and Subsoils
Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI) data2 indicate that the bedrock geology underlying the site consists ofWaulsortian Limestone. This massive, fine grained, unbedded limestone is Carboniferous in age3. Two majorfault lines traverse the site, the first runs almost parallel with the site’s southern boundary and the second, inthe eastern section of the site, runs in a north to south orientation.
Older Carboniferous marine interbedded grey/brown sandstone, siltstone and mudstones, referred to as theCuskinny Formation of the Kinsale Group (Lower Carboniferous age), occur to the south of the southernfault.
According to the GSI, subsoil consists of made ground across the majority of the site with bedrockoutcropping in places. Previous AECOM field studies have identified two separate geological units beneaththe Pfizer Ringaskiddy site, which include relatively low permeability subsoil deposits (comprising of soft,grey to greenish brown silts, with some fine sand and gravel) overlying Carboniferous Limestone.
Subsoil thickness varies considerably across the site, with a thickness east of OSP1 of 4.3 m and increasingto 11.8 m north of the wastewater treatment plant. These silty subsoils thicken in an inferred infilled glacialchannel (roughly co-incident with the mapped north-south fault line), in the area north of the nature pond.
1 www.epa.ie – accessed 01 June 20172 www.gsi.ie3 Geological Survey of Ireland – Geology of the South Cork, Sheet 25, 1994
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM11
Eastward from this point the subsoils decrease in thickness again until limestone bedrock outcrops on thesite’s eastern boundary.
Pale grey to bluish grey, fine grained, crystalline limestone, often weathered to varying depths, lies beneaththe subsoils. This fractured rock is considered to have a relatively high hydraulic conductivity. Geologicallogging of the bedrock4 indicated the limestone aquifer is complex, with a characteristic upper-weatheredzone, the lower horizons of which are brecciated or fractured to the point of being gravelly in nature, and withthree distinct joint orientations (one vertical). The bedrock porosity was found to be between 1% and 3%,with weathered bedrock porosity estimated to be an average value of 15% (estimations due to variability ofweathered limestone).
Depths to the top of competent bedrock range between 3.3 m (east of the containment wells) and 16.7 m bgl(north of the containment wells).
1.2.5 Hydrogeology
According to the GSI website, the bedrock aquifer beneath the site is classified as a “Locally importantaquifer – karstified (Lk)”. Due to the fractured nature of bedrock beneath the Pfizer Ringaskiddy siteidentified in previous investigations, the aquifer is considered to be relatively productive in this area. TheGSI’s classification of vulnerability of the underlying aquifer is ‘High’ to ‘Extreme’ vulnerability, with bedrocklocally exposed at the surface.
1.2.6 Groundwater Flow
Hydrogeological conditions at the site (groundwater flow direction, dilution, and degradation of contaminants)have been examined by AECOM in several investigations since 1993. A summary of the early investigationsis presented in an AECOM quantitative risk assessment report from 20065.
General depths to groundwater range from 4 m to 10 m below casing top (m bct) across the site.
Ultimately, groundwater in the limestone is interpreted to flow in an easterly direction under normalgroundwater conditions (natural gradient). However, when this flow reaches the glacial channel in theeastern portion of the site, it swings northward to discharge to Monkstown Creek on the site’s northernboundary.
A hydraulic containment system has been in operation since February 1996, comprising two activeabstraction wells, C1 and C2. This system alters natural gradient conditions and contains groundwater withinan area north of the nature pond (see Figure 2) and is designed to prevent groundwater with lowconcentrations of volatile organic compounds from reaching the northern site boundary.
In previous site investigations, an upward hydraulic gradient was identified between the subsoil and bedrockaquifers, suggesting groundwater confined in the bedrock aquifer is being forced up into the subsoils above.
1.2.7 Groundwater Redox Chemistry
Previous field measurements of low redox potential and relatively high concentrations of dissolvedmanganese and iron, together with low to non-detectable nitrate concentrations, indicate strongly reducinggroundwater conditions beneath the site.
While health and safety procedures on site currently prevent the field measurement of dissolved oxygen andredox potential (water quality meter is not intrinsically safe), the low nitrate concentrations reported in manywells indicate that redox conditions in groundwater remain reducing. In addition, hydrogen sulphide odourswere noted from groundwater from one of the seven wells, which is also an indication of reducing conditions.
4 URS, Phase III Groundwater Investigation and February 1995 Groundwater Monitoring Results for the Ringaskiddy,Cork Facility on behalf of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, URS report reference 17717-018-401/MF/pl, dated 15 May 19955 URS, Pfizer Ringaskiddy Controlled Water Quantitative Risk Assessment, URS report reference 45078513, dated 12October 2006
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM12
1.2.8 Chemicals of Potential Concern in Groundwater
Groundwater monitoring data is available for the Ringaskiddy site dating back over twenty years (to 1994/5).Historically, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been detected in groundwater from the site, mostnotably: BTEX hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene), alcohols and tetrahydrofuran(THF). Alcohol detections are intermittent, but for the most part undetected in recent years; while BTEX andTHF tend to persist, though with long-term decreasing concentration trends being apparent.
In 1996, a hydraulic containment system was installed (wells C1 and C2) to reduce the mass of dissolvedphase VOCs migrating off-site via groundwater flow toward Cork Harbour. Since 1996 groundwater hasbeen abstracted from wells C1 and C2 on a continuous basis and treated in the site Waste Water TreatmentPlant. The mass of solvent recovered through operation of the hydraulic containment system is estimatedfrom pumping rates and analytical data from biannual monitoring. Assessment of containment systemefficiency and the need for rehabilitation works is incorporated in biannual monitoring reports.
In 1998, following two solvent loss incidents relating to underground storage tanks (USTs), the down-gradienthydraulic containment system was augmented by the installation of free-phase product recovery wells R1,R3 and R4 in the underground storage tank (UST) source areas. Pumping from the R-series wells ceased in1998/1999 in advance of removal of the northern and southern UST tank farms.
Following UST removal from the solvent recovery area, additional recovery wells, RC1-RC6, were installed inthe former southern UST tank farm footprint in 2000. Pumping from the RC wells ceased in May 2005 andthe RC-series were decommissioned in May 2007 with EPA consent.
Since the hydraulic containment system was commissioned, dissolved phase concentrations of BTEX andTHF have reduced. Between 2009 and 2011, methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) concentrations peaked down-gradient of the solvent recovery area and subsequently declined (data available up to November 2016).
Most of the chemicals used on site are prone to degradation under aerobic and, in many cases, anaerobicconditions. The main exception is THF, which has been found to be relatively persistent in groundwatersamples collected from on-site monitoring wells, compared to the other volatile chemicals used on site.
1.2.9 Source-Pathway-Receptor Linkages
A summary of potential Source-Pathway-Receptor (SPR) linkages is outlined in the table below.
Potential SPR Linkages
Sources Pathways Receptor
S1 Residual contaminationremaining beneath the formersouthern underground storagetank (UST) farm area – BTEX,alcohols and THF
S2 Residual contaminationremaining below ground in thearea north of the containmentwells – BTEX, THF andcyclohexane
S3 Residual contaminationremaining below ground in thearea north-west of thecontainment wells –MTBE
Human HealthP1 Ingestion of soil/dust, groundwater and/orsurface waterP2 Dermal contact with soil/ dust, groundwaterand/or surface waterP3 Inhalation of indoor and outdoorcontaminant vapours which can arise directlyfrom residual contaminants in the unsaturatedoverburden itself and indirectly via thedissolved phase in groundwater
Human HealthS1 On-site workers
S2 Off-site workers
S3 Workers on-siteundertakingsubsurface works
Controlled WatersP4 Lateral migration of contaminants throughthe bedrock aquifer
Controlled WatersS4 Monkstown Creek(pNHA 001979)
S5 Cork Harbour(SPA 004030)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM13
1.2.10 Monitoring Network
Over many years of site investigation, Pfizer Ringaskiddy has installed a large number of monitoring wells onthe site. Monitoring wells are screened at various depths, with the majority of wells installed in the bedrockaquifer. Known construction details for the IEL monitoring wells are summarised in Table 2.
Under the terms of Condition 6 and Schedule C.6 of the site’s IEL (P0013-04), Pfizer Ringaskiddy is requiredto undertake biannual groundwater monitoring from eight groundwater wells installed on site (monitoringwells: 3, 7, 205, 404, 409, 501, 702 and hydraulic containment well C1). However, well 3 wasdecommissioned in 2007, with EPA approval.
1.3 Project Objectives
The objectives of groundwater monitoring for Round 1 2017 are as follows:
· To sample groundwater from seven wells and analyse for the parameters required by the site’s IEL
· To assess the direction of groundwater flow
· To assess changes in contaminant concentration trends over time
1.4 Scope of Works
For the Round 1 2017 groundwater monitoring round, the following scope of work was completed:
· Measurement of depths to groundwater and total well depths in all accessible monitoring wells acrossthe site
· Groundwater purging and sampling from the seven IEL wells and one additional well to the north-east ofthe hydraulic containment area, well 406
· Recording of groundwater temperature in the field
· Laboratory analysis
· Data assessment and reporting
1.4.1 Sampling Methodology
Prior to sampling, a round of depth to groundwater level measurements (‘dip round’) from the wells wascompleted. Water level (‘dip’) measurements were taken using an interface probe, which is capable ofdistinguishing between water and light/dense non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs). Light NAPLs (such asBTEX compounds in their pure phase) can form a floating later on the water table, while dense NAPLs canpool at the base of wells.
The total measured depth of each well was also gauged using the interface probe.
Groundwater was sampled in accordance with standard AECOM procedures, based on ISO 5667-18:2001and US EPA methods.
The total volume of standing water in each monitoring well to be sampled was calculated. Between three andfive times this volume was purged by hand from the monitoring well before sampling. This was to ensurethat a groundwater sample representative of that in the aquifer was collected. Each monitoring well isequipped with dedicated in-situ purging and sampling HDPE inertial-lift tubing to minimise the risk of cross-contamination.
Containment wells C1 and C2 are equipped with pumps which operate to provide hydraulic containmentalong the site’s down-gradient boundary. When these wells are pumping, purging is not required andgroundwater samples are normally collected directly from the sampling tap at the wellhead.
Pfizer Ringaskiddy has a number of EX-rated areas across the site and, for safety reasons; the use of petrol-powered motorised pumps or battery-powered field meters is not permitted. Therefore, unstable water qualityparameters (pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation-reduction potential) were not
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM14
recorded in May 2017, as the water quality meter is not intrinsically safe. Measurements of pH and electricalconductivity (EC) are required by the site’s IEL and were measured in the laboratory. Field temperaturereadings for all sampling points were measured using a spirit thermometer.
In accordance with AECOM sampling protocols, sampling was conducted while wearing single usedisposable nitrile gloves, which were changed between sampling events to reduce the risk of cross-contamination between wells. Groundwater samples were collected in sequence from wells beginning withhistorically low concentrations and progressing to wells with historically higher concentrations, to minimisethe risk of cross-contamination.
Groundwater samples, filtered and preserved where appropriate, were collected into laboratory-suppliedsample containers and were labelled on-site. Samples were stored in a chilled cool-box on site and duringovernight transit to the contract laboratory.
1.4.2 Laboratory Analyses
Groundwater samples were sent for analysis to Exova Jones Environmental, Flintshire, UK; an AECOMapproved laboratory with UKAS accreditation.
Groundwater samples were analysed for the following suites of parameters:
· Volatile organic compounds
· Alcohols
· Dissolved heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, zinc and mercury)
· Ammoniacal nitrogen as N
· Major ions (chloride, potassium, sodium, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, sulphate, nitrate, nitrite, magnesiumand calcium)
· Carbonate, bicarbonate and total alkalinity
· Ionic balance
A sample inventory is provided in Table 1, with a well inventory in Table 2, field observations are presented inTable 3 with a record of groundwater elevations in Table 4. Analytical results are presented in Tables 5 – 8.Long-term concentration trends for key wells and parameters are provided in Appendix A, with laboratorycertificates in Appendix B.
2. Results & Discussion of Monitoring Programme
2.1 Site Hydrogeology and Groundwater Flow
2.1.1 Water Quality Parameters
Unstable water quality parameters consisting of pH, electrical conductivity (both were measured in thelaboratory) and temperature (which was measured in the field) are given in Table 3 and summarised below.
Groundwater temperature from monitoring wells ranged from 12.5°C (well 7) to 14.5°C (well 205). Thenormal range for Irish groundwater (10°C – 12°C).
The majority of groundwater pH values were at or near neutral, with values ranging between 6.8 (well 501)and 7.7 (well C1). The typical pH range for Irish groundwater is 6 – 9 pH units. These results are comparableto those of previous monitoring rounds for the site.
Groundwater EC results in May 2017 indicated fresh to slightly brackish groundwater, with a range from482 µS/cm (well 409) to 1,195 µS/cm (well 702). The higher EC results (>1,000 µS/cm) for wells 702(1,195 µS/cm) and C1 (1,141 µS/cm) reflect their proximity to the coast and slight influence of saline water.The results recorded here are similar to those of previous monitoring rounds. For well 406, EC was637 µS/cm.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM15
Groundwater abstraction from containment wells C1 and C2 is inferred to draw groundwater of a morebrackish quality from Monkstown Creek, giving rise to elevated EC readings in groundwater from some wells.All EC results for the monitoring wells were below the upper GTV limit of 1,875 µS/cm in May 2017.
2.1.2 Groundwater Flow Pattern
Groundwater elevations in the drift and bedrock wells have been contoured (see Figures 3 and 4). Waterlevel measurements for the IEL wells are presented in Table 4.
Groundwater elevations from the network of monitoring wells indicate that the general direction ofgroundwater flow in May 2017 is to the east, consistent with previous dip rounds (see Figures 3 and 4).Groundwater abstraction from hydraulic containment wells C1 and C2 has been designed to limit themigration of groundwater off-site to Monkstown Creek to the north and east of the site. Groundwatercontours for the bedrock aquifer (Figure 4) show that in May 2017 eastward and northward groundwater flowis being prevented in the area of the infilled glacial channel and that groundwater is being drawn back towardthe containment wells C1 and C2. The groundwater elevation in well 406 is 1.32 m OD, compared to 0.41 mOD in hydraulic containment well C1, indicating that well 406 is up hydraulic gradient of the containment well.
In the south-eastern corner of the site (OSP4 area) northward groundwater flow is apparent, as this area issome distance from the containment wells and it appears that groundwater flow under natural gradientconditions to Monkstown Creek is occurring.
Water level measurements from across the monitored wells show that the highest groundwater elevation iswithin the source area at well 501 (2.99 m OD), adjacent to OSP1. The lowest groundwater elevation acrossthe site was down-gradient of the source area at containment well C1 (0.41 m OD).
2.1.3 Field Observations
During the water level measurement round, no light/dense NAPL layers were identified in any of the wells.
The total depth of each well was measured on 15 May 2017 and has been compared to the recorded welldepths on installation; see Table 4.
Current details of well conditions are presented in Table 2 and measurements of siltation included in Table 4.
2.2 Laboratory Results
2.2.1 Assessment Guidelines
Results of laboratory analysis of groundwater samples are presented in Tables 5 – 8 and are compared witha range of generic groundwater assessment criteria, specifically the EPA Interim Guideline Values (IGVs),the Groundwater Threshold Values (GTVs) and the Dutch Intervention Values (DIVs).
IGVs were developed by the EPA using a number of existing water quality guidelines in use in Ireland,including existing national environmental quality standards, proposed common indicators for the newgroundwater directive, drinking water standards and Geological Survey of Ireland trigger values.
GTVs are defined in Irish law in Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016, European CommunitiesEnvironmental Objectives (Groundwater) (Amendment) Regulations, 2016. The GTVs are regulatoryguidelines, which were developed to give effect to the EU Groundwater Directive. Exceedance of athreshold value triggers further investigation to confirm whether a ‘Poor’ groundwater chemical status for thegroundwater body as a whole is indicated.
The DIVs represent concentrations, above which there may be a risk to human receptors, and above whichmore detailed site-specific risk assessment or remediation may be required in The Netherlands. Theseguidelines have no legal standing in Ireland but are included as they have historically been used as ascreening tool for contaminants at the Ringaskiddy site since 1994/5.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM16
2.2.2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
VOC results for Round 1 May 2017 are presented in Table 5, with historic data and time-series trends inAppendix A.
The highest concentration of total VOCs was detected in groundwater from well 501. VOCs detected ingroundwater from well 501 (adjacent to OSP1 building in the source area) in Round 1 2017 werepredominantly BTEX compounds:
· Benzene: 0.003 mg/L
· Toluene: 0.029 mg/L
· Ethyl benzene: 1.075 mg/L
· Total Xylene: 8.893 mg/L
Concentrations of BTEX compounds increased slightly in May 2017 compared with November 2016 results,in groundwater from well 501, where BTEX increased from 8.5 mg/L to 10 mg/L. However, prior to November2016, BTEX concentrations in groundwater from well 501 were generally above 50 mg/L.
The concentration of MTBE in well 501 decreased from 0.11 mg/L to 0.08 mg/L between November 2016and May 2017. Other VOCs, including: isopropylbenzene (0.018 mg/L), 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (0.013 mg/L)and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (0.017 mg/L) were detected in groundwater from well 501 in May 2017. OnlyBTEX results exceeded relevant screening criteria for the sample taken from well 501 in May 2017.
Benzene was detected in groundwater from one of the other six licensed monitoring wells on site in May2017. Well C1, located down-gradient of the source area, had a benzene concentration of 0.026 mg/L, whichis above the GTV (0.00075 mg/L) and IGV (0.001 mg/L) but below the DIV (0.03 mg/L) screening criteria forbenzene in groundwater. Benzene was below the method detection limit (MDL) in groundwater from wells:7, 205, 404, 409, 702 and 406.
BTEX compounds were below MDLs in groundwater from wells 7, 205, 404, 409 and 702. Wells 7 and 205are located down-gradient of the source area; well 409 is adjacent to OSP3 and south of the source area;while well 702 is located near OSP4, in the south-eastern part of the site.
BTEX concentration trends since May 2005 are presented in Appendix A, Figures A1 to A4.
MTBE was not detected in groundwater from wells 7, 409 and 702 in May 2017. Where detected, MTBEconcentrations were not above the IGV (0.03 mg/L) in May 2017. MTBE was, however, detected above theGTV (0.01 mg/L) in four wells (205, 404, 501 and C1), with reported concentrations ranging from 0.008 mg/L(well 501) to 0.018 mg/L (well 205). MTBE concentrations for all four wells decreased between November2016 and May 2017.
Total VOC concentrations in groundwater in May 2017 were generally stable compared to November 2016.The main changes in concentrations detected between the monitoring events are as follows:
· Well 7 – all VOCs remained below their MDLs between November 2016 and May 2017.
· Well 205 – total VOC concentration decreased from 0.027 mg/L in November 2016 to 0.018 mg/L inMay 2017, with only MTBE detected. This is the lowest concentrations recorded since May 2007
· Well 404 – total VOC concentration decreased from 0.17 mg/L in November 2016 to 0.017 mg/L in May2017, with only MTBE detected. This is the lowest concentration recorded since November 2007
· Well 409 – total VOC concentration increased from below detection to 0.002 mg/L between November2016 and May 2017, with only chloroform detected. There have been intermittent low concentrations ofchloroform detected in groundwater from well 409. The last detection was in November 2015
· Well 501 – total VOC concentration increased from 8.7 mg/L in November 2016 to 10 mg/L in May 2017,primarily due to an increase in m- and p-xylene concentration from 7.6 mg/L in November 2016 to8.9 mg/L in May 2017.
· Well 702 – all VOCs remained below their MDLs between November 2016 and May 2017.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM17
· Well C1 – total VOCs increased slightly from 0.023 mg/L in November 2016 to 0.044 mg/L in May 2017due to an increase in benzene concentration in May 2017, all other VOCs except MTBE were belowtheir MDLs.
A trend diagram for total VOC concentrations from May 2005 to May 2017 for wells 501 (source area) and205 (down-gradient of the source area) is presented in Figure 5. In addition, a trend diagram over the sameperiod for total BTEX concentrations for wells 501 and 205 is presented in Figure 6.
Total VOC and BTEX show declining trends in both 501 and 205, with the exception of an isolated increasein VOC in well 205 in November 2009.
2.2.3 Alcohols and Other Dissolved Organics
Results for alcohols and other dissolved organics in Round 1 May 2017 are presented in Table 6.
In May 2017, no alcohol compounds were detected in groundwater above the laboratory MDLs.
In May 2015 increased concentrations of alcohols had been detected in groundwater from well 501. Pfizersubsequently identified leaks in two weak effluent manholes, CS116 and CS124, which are located in closeproximity up-stream of well 501. Repair work to the aforementioned manholes was successfully completedon 05 February 2016 and both manholes passed pressure testing to EN1610. The absence of alcohol inboth 2016 sampling rounds and in Round 1 2017 further confirms that issues with these manholes havebeen successfully rectified.
Trend diagrams for THF and cyclohexane concentrations for all licensed wells are presented in Appendix A,Figures A6 and A7 respectively.
THF remains below the MDL (0.01 mg/L) in groundwater from wells: 7 (since November 2009), 205 (sinceMay 2011), 409 (since November 2009) and 702 (not detected since monitoring began).
Recent THF concentration trends in wells 404, 501 and C1 are summarised below:
· Well 404 – decreased from 0.062 mg/L in November 2016 to 0.052 mg/L in May 2017
· Well 501 – increased from below the MDL in November 2016 to 0.039 mg/L in May 2017
· Well C1 – increased from 0.111 mg/L in November 2016 to 0.139 mg/L in May 2017
· Well 406 – increased from below the MDL in November 2016 to 0.011 mg/L in May 2017
Cyclohexane concentrations remain below the MDL in groundwater from wells: 7 (since May 2007), 205(since May 2011), 409 (not detected since monitoring began), 702 (not detected since monitoring began), C1(since May 2009) and 406 (since November 1995).
In groundwater from well 501, cyclohexane was detected at 0.36 mg/L in May 2017, its lowest concentrationin over ten years.
Cyclohexane concentration in groundwater from well 404 decreased from 0.14 in November 2016 to belowthe MDL in May 2017.
Acetone concentrations remain below the MDL in groundwater from all wells.
Acetone was detected in well 404 at a concentration of 0.14 mg/L in November 2016 but declined below theMDL in May 2017.
Ethyl acetate remains below the MDL and has not been detected above its MDL since 1998.
2.2.4 Dissolved Heavy Metals
Metal results are presented in Table 7.
Cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc were not detected above their respective MDLsin groundwater sampled from the seven IEL wells monitored in May 2017 and well 406.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM18
Arsenic, was detected above the MDL (0.0025 mg/L) in groundwater from five of the seven IEL wellsmonitored in May 2017, wells 7, 205, 404, 501 and C1. Concentrations detected in groundwater from 7(0.013 mg/L), 205 (0.028 mg/L), 404 (0.019 mg/L) and 501 (0.015 mg/L) exceeded relevant assessmentcriteria, including the GTV of 0.0075 mg/L and the IGV of 0.01 mg/L. The arsenic concentration in well C1(0.006 mg/L) remained below the relevant assessment criteria.
Arsenic was also detected in groundwater from well 406 at 0.009 mg/L, exceeding the GTV.
The source of these trace arsenic detections in groundwater is considered to be from naturally-occurringmetallic minerals in the underlying limestone bedrock. Arsenic solubility increases under anaerobicgroundwater conditions, such as those found beneath the site.
2.2.5 Major Ions
Major ion results are presented in Table 8.
Nitrite was below the MDL at five of the seven IEL wells in May 2017 except at low concentrations ingroundwater from wells 7 (0.1 mg/L) and C1 (0.05 mg/L). Nitrite was also below detection in groundwaterfrom well 406.
Nitrate was detected above the MDL (0.2 mg/L) in groundwater from four of the seven wells sampled in May2017, with concentrations ranging from 0.7 mg/L (well 7) to 5.1 mg/L (well 409). All nitrate concentrationswere below applicable screening criteria. Nitrate was below detection in groundwater from well 406.
Calcium and magnesium were detected in groundwater from all wells sampled at concentrations belowrelevant assessment criteria.
Chloride was detected at concentrations between 10 mg/L and 35 mg/L in groundwater from wells 7, 409 and501. Chloride concentrations for wells 205, 404, 702 and C1 were higher, ranging from 123 mg/L to260 mg/L, with a concentration of 99 mg/L detected in groundwater from well 406.
Elevated sodium concentrations (>100 mg/L) were also reported for groundwater from wells 205, 404, 702and C1 with concentrations up to 168 mg/L (C1) reported. Wells with the highest sodium concentrationscorresponded to those with the highest chloride concentrations and EC measurements of >1,000 µS/cm.Elevated readings of these parameters are likely to be due to the coastal setting and influence of brackishwater from the coast, possibly drawn in by groundwater abstraction from the containment wells.
Potassium concentrations ranged from 1.0 mg/L in well 409 to 12.8 mg/L in well 702. Concentrations in 702and C1 (8.6 mg/L) were above the IGV of 5 mg/L, as was the potassium concentration in well 406; elevatedpotassium concentrations for these wells are also inferred to be linked to the site’s coastal setting.
Sulphate was detected in groundwater from all seven IEL wells sampled and well 406, with concentrationsfor all wells less than the IGV (200 mg/L) and GTV (187.5 mg/L).
Concentrations of ammoniacal-nitrogen in groundwater from wells 7, 205, 404, 501, C1 and well 406, rangedfrom 0.4 mg/L (well 7) to 1.42 mg/L (well 404) indicating reducing groundwater conditions in these wells. Theconcentrations of ammoniacal-nitrogen in the remaining wells 409 and 702 were below the MDL (0.02 mg/L).
In May 2017, as in previous groundwater monitoring rounds, iron concentrations for wells 409 and 702 werelow (below the MDL for iron in both wells). Manganese was also low in groundwater from well 702. Low ironconcentrations coupled with elevated nitrate and the absence of ammoniacal-nitrogen, as present at wells409 and 702, suggest more oxidising groundwater conditions. Iron and manganese are oxidised to insolubleforms when oxygen is present.
In a reducing environment, naturally occurring iron and manganese in the aquifer material can dissolve intogroundwater. As such, iron and manganese concentrations reported for wells 7, 205, 404, 501 and C1indicate reducing conditions and are consistent with previous IEL monitoring rounds and results forammoniacal nitrogen and nitrate.
Results for total alkalinity in groundwater from all seven IEL monitoring wells are due to the presence ofbicarbonate alkalinity only (as all carbonate alkalinity concentrations were below the MDL). Measurements of
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM19
alkalinity can reflect the groundwater’s buffering capacity to pH change, with higher concentrations allowingfor greater resistance. Concentrations of total alkalinity range between 228 mg/L (well C1) and 324 mg/L(well 7) and are similar to ranges reported by Johnston and McConvey6 for Dinantian Limestones elsewherein Ireland.
For all wells in May2017, the ionic balances are below ±10%. In general, an ionic balance difference within±10% is taken to indicate that sampling procedures and laboratory analytical practices are acceptable. Theabsence of certain parameters, such as fluoride, from the analysis suite may influence the ionic balancecalculations.
Major ion results for May 2017 were generally within the ranges reported for previous monitoring rounds.
2.3 Temporal Trends of Chemical of Potential Concern
Groundwater monitoring data is available for the Ringaskiddy site dating back over twenty years (to 1994/5).Historically, VOCs have been detected in groundwater from the site, most notably: BTEX hydrocarbons,alcohols and THF. Alcohol detections are intermittent, but for the most part undetected in recent years; whileBTEX and THF tend to persist, with long-term declining concentration trends becoming apparent.
In general, dissolved organic compound concentrations across the site have shown significant decreasessince the mid-1990s. This is due to a combination of factors, including:
· Engineering upgrades
· UST removal in the Solvent Recovery Area north of OSP1
· Contaminated groundwater recovery and continued operation of the hydraulic containment system
Recent trends (~10 years) in BTEX and total VOC concentrations in the source area (well 501) havedeclined from>150 mg/L to ≤10 (Figures 5 and 6). Both trends follow very similar patterns, as total VOCconcentrations in well 501 are largely composed of BTEX hydrocarbons.
Total VOC concentrations down-gradient of the source area at well C1 have been less than 1 mg/L sinceMay 2006. Historical VOC data is tabulated in Appendix A.
The MTBE concentration for well 501, located in the source area, decreased from 0.11 mg/L in November2016 to 0.008 mg/L in May 2017. Down-gradient of the source area, MTBE concentrations detected ingroundwater from wells 205 and 404 also decreased in May 2017, to 0.018 mg/L and 0.017 mg/Lrespectively, and have remained below 1 mg/L since November 2012 for both wells (see Appendix A - FigureA5).
The containment wells appear to capture MTBE-contaminated groundwater from these up-gradient wellsthrough the influence of pumping.
2.4 Review of Solvent Mass Recovery
Trend diagrams of solvent mass recovery via groundwater abstraction, from May 1996 to May 2017, arepresented in Figure 7A and 7B. Small quantities of solvent mass are being recovered from both containmentwells C1 and C2, with approximately 3.9 kg total VOCs being recovered between November 2016 and May2017.
It’s likely that residual groundwater contamination from the up-gradient source area is being significantlyattenuated naturally along its flow path down-gradient.
Figure 7A indicates that groundwater abstraction from the R-series wells on-site ceased in September 1999,due to excavation works at the southern UST tank farm. Groundwater abstraction from the RC-wells on-siteceased in May 2005 and the wells were decommissioned in August 2007 with agreement from the EPA.
6 Water Framework Directive – The Calcareous/Non-Calcareous (“Siliceous”) Classification of Bedrock Aquifers in theRepublic of Ireland, 2003
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM20
A feasibility study on the impact of decommissioning the RC wells and nearby well 601 was commissionedby Pfizer and prepared by AECOM (URS report reference: 46171688) in May 2006. The study concludedthat cessation of pumping and decommissioning of the seven wells in the RC area would have negligibleimpact on off-site groundwater receptors.
The report recommended that specified actions be taken during decommissioning to ensure effectiveclosure. The report also noted that, despite cessation of pumping from the RC wells, the containment wellsC1 and C2 would continue to operate. Hydraulic containment provided by these wells is expected to preventmigration of contaminated groundwater from the site.
2.5 Conceptual Site Model
The site lies just above Monkstown Creek, with higher ground to the south and west sloping steeply towardsthe coast to the north and east. Bedrock consists of fractured, fine grained, unbedded limestone. Subsoilsconsist of low permeability deposits (comprising soft silts with some fine sand and gravel) ranging from 0.2 mto 16.7 m bgl, with a thick, in-filled glacial channel occupying an area north of the nature pond.
Under natural gradient conditions, groundwater in the limestone aquifer is thought to flow in a north eastdirection and discharge to Monkstown Creek (the principal groundwater receptor). However, due to theaction of hydraulic containment wells on site, installed in 1996, groundwater is contained in an area aroundwells C1 and C2 (see Figure 2 for locations). Schematic representations of geology underlying the PfizerRingaskiddy site are presented in AECOM’s 1995 site investigation report7, while the conceptual site model(CSM) was presented in AECOM 2006 risk assessment.
2.5.1 Hydraulic Containment
Since 1993, the main contaminated source area identified during site investigations was located in theformer southern UST farm, north of OSP1. Other source zones (of smaller extent) were identified in areas tothe north and north-west of the containment wells (see Figure 2). The controlled water quantitative riskassessment (AECOM, 2006) concluded that, in the event of containment wells C1 and C2 being turned off,contaminated groundwater from the identified source areas would not pose a significant risk to MonkstownCreek.
Historically, VOCs have been detected in groundwater from the site, most notably: BTEX (benzene, toluene,ethylbenzene and xylene) hydrocarbons, alcohols and tetrahydrofuran (THF). Alcohol detections areintermittent, while BTEX and THF tend to persist, though with long-term declining concentration trends beingapparent.
The hydraulic containment system installed in 1996 (wells C1 and C2) not only contains contaminatedgroundwater on site but was also designed to reduce the mass of dissolved phase VOCs migrating off-site toCork Harbour. To this end, groundwater is abstracted from wells C1 and C2 on a continuous basis. Themass of solvent recovered through operation of the hydraulic containment system is estimated from pumpingrates and analytical data from biannual monitoring. Assessment of containment system efficiency and theneed for rehabilitation works is incorporated in biannual monitoring reports.
In 1998, following a loss incident, the hydraulic containment system was augmented by the installation offree-phase product recovery wells. Recovery wells R1, R3 and R4 were installed in the solvent recoveryarea with additional recovery wells, RC1-RC6, installed in 2000. Solvent recovery from the R-series wellsceased in 1999 and from the RC-series of wells recovery ceased in May 2005; the RC-series weredecommissioned in May 2007.
Since the hydraulic containment system was commissioned, dissolved phase concentrations of BTEX andTHF have reduced further. More recently, MTBE concentrations peaked down-gradient of the solventrecovery area and subsequently declined (data available up to May 201).
7 URS, Phase III Groundwater Investigation and February 1995 Groundwater Monitoring Results for the Ringaskiddy,Cork Facility, URS report reference 17717-018-401/MF/pl, dated 15 May 1995
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM21
A review of remedial options for the site was conducted in 2014 and completed in 20158. It was concludedthat the benefits of any scheme, over and above the mass recovery obtained with the current hydrauliccontainment system, are likely to be limited in nature due to the difficulties in effectively targeting anytreatment within the source zone and given the uncertainty of contaminant mass distribution within thecomplex limestone bedrock aquifer and/or the silty-sandy gravel drift unit directly overlying it. Practicalityissues, particularly relating to access in the operational solvent recovery and solvent tank farm areas,together with Health & Safety requirements, are likely to limit the effectiveness of the design of any schemefor enhancing mass recovery from the source area, which is located within an ATEX Zone area. The benefitsof any of the options assessed are considered likely to be outweighed by low sustainability.
2.5.2 Potential Pollutant Linkages
A summary of potential Source-Pathway-Receptor (SPR) linkages is outlined in the table below.
Potential SPR Linkages
Sources Pathways Potential Receptor
S1 Residual contaminationremaining beneath the formersouthern underground storagetank (UST) farm area – BTEX,alcohols and THF
S2 Residual contaminationremaining below ground in thearea north of the containmentwells – BTEX, THF andcyclohexane
S3 Residual contaminationremaining below ground in thearea north-west of thecontainment wells –MTBE
Human HealthP1 Ingestion of soil/dust, groundwaterand/or surface waterP2 Dermal contact with soil/ dust,groundwater and/or surface waterP3 Inhalation of indoor and outdoorcontaminant vapours which can arisedirectly from residual contaminants in theunsaturated overburden itself and indirectlyvia the dissolved phase in groundwater
Human HealthS1 On-site workers
S2 Off-site workers
S3 Workers on-siteundertaking subsurfaceworks
Controlled WatersP4 Lateral migration of contaminantsthrough the bedrock aquifer
Controlled WatersS4 Monkstown Creek(pNHA 001979)
S5 Cork Harbour (SPA004030)
Based on the current site status and monitoring data it is considered that:
· The potential for ingestion of contaminated soil/dust and groundwater is low. The former northern andsouthern UST farms, key source areas for contaminated soil and groundwater, were removed in 1998and 1999 (along with associated contaminated soils, which were bio-remediated on site), respectively,reducing contaminant concentrations in groundwater. On-site personnel do not have routine contactwith either soil or groundwater.
· Similarly, the potential for dermal contact with contaminated soil/dust and groundwater is low, for thereasons outlined above.
· The potential for indoor inhalation of contaminant vapours on site is low, as the nearest occupiedbuilding in the vicinity of the source area is up-topographical and hydraulic gradient (OSP 1). Outdoorinhalation of volatile compounds emanating from contaminated soil and groundwater is also consideredlow, as contaminated soil and groundwater in the source areas have been remediated to an acceptablelevel with regard to exposure to human health via vapour inhalation.
· The potential for indoor/outdoor inhalation of contaminant vapours by workers on off-site properties isconsidered negligible, as there are no occupied properties down-gradient of the site and contaminated
8 AECOM, Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater Remediation Assessment 2014, AECOM report reference47092735/CKRP0001, February 2015
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM22
groundwater is either captured by the containment wells or discharges to Monkstown Creek from thesite.
· There is a potential for on-site workers to be exposed to low level contamination in the source area ofthe Pfizer Ringaskiddy site if redevelopment requiring excavation is undertaken. However, if such workswere to be undertaken, then project-specific additional health and safety procedures would be put inplace to protect site workers (e.g. permit system, air monitoring with action levels, PPE, etc.).
· Given the site’s coastal setting and the fact that groundwater in this area is likely to be brackish, it isunlikely that wells for potable use are/will be located in the vicinity of the site.
· The mass of dissolved contaminants in groundwater migrating laterally through the bedrock aquifer fromthe source area towards Monkstown Creek is considered low. Two hydraulic containment wells capturegroundwater with dissolved contamination. In addition, dissolved phase organic contaminants are beingsignificantly attenuated along the groundwater flow path (through sorption, in-situ degradation, dilutionand dispersion).
3. Summary, Conclusions and Recommended Way Forward
3.1 Summary and Conclusion
Groundwater monitoring was undertaken between 15 and 17 May 2017 for Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals attheir API plant, Ballintaggart, Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork (Pfizer Ringaskiddy). The scope of work included:groundwater level measurement in all accessible wells; sampling groundwater from seven on-site wells;analysis for parameters required by the site’s IEL and determination of the direction of groundwater flow.
In general, the groundwater flow pattern and long term declining solvent trends have remained consistent atPfizer Ringaskiddy and can be summarized as follows:
· Groundwater flow direction in both the subsoil and bedrock aquifers is in an eastward direction acrossthe western portion of the site. Moving further east, groundwater in the bedrock aquifer is contained inan area north of the nature pond by groundwater abstraction from two containment wells: C1 and C2. Itis understood from historic data that, under natural gradient conditions, groundwater flow in this areawould swing northward towards Monkstown Creek.
· A general overall declining trend in solvent concentrations has been evident in groundwater from the IELmonitored wells at Pfizer Ringaskiddy since the mid-1990s.
· Solvent mass recovery, as a result of groundwater abstraction from wells C1 and C2 (and historicallyfrom other wells), has followed an overall trend of decreasing mass loads over time. This is attributed toa combination of engineering up-grades, removal of source contaminants and groundwater abstractionitself. Ongoing natural attenuation of dissolved solvent concentrations along the groundwater pathwaydown-gradient of the source area has also reduced the overall mass recovered.
Conclusions from Round 1 May 2017 monitoring round are:
· No floating/sinking non-aqueous phase liquid layer was detected in any of the monitoring wells dipped.
· Total VOC concentrations in May 2017 were generally stable compared to November 2017, increasingslightly in groundwater from three wells.
· Alcohols and acetone were below detection in groundwater from all seven IEL monitoring wells in May2017.
· The THF concentration increased in groundwater from well 501 between November 2016 and May2017, from below the MDL to 0.04mg/L. THF also increased in groundwater from well C1 betweenNovember 2016 and May 2017, from 0.011 mg/L in November 2016 to 0.14 mg/L in May 2017. The THFconcentration decreased in groundwater from well 404 (from 0.062 mg/L in November 2016 to0.052 mg/L in May 2017).. THF remained below the MDL in groundwater from wells 7, 205, 409 and702.
· Cyclohexane was detected in groundwater from one well, 501 (0.36 mg/L) in May 2017. Cyclohexaneremained below MDL in the remaining six wells.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater MonitoringRound 1 (May) 2017 IEL Report
Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM23
· In 2015, leaks were identified in two weak effluent manholes CS116 and CS124 located up-stream ofwell 501. Repairs to the manholes were completed in February 2016, with both manholes passingEN1610 pressure testing. Decreases in alcohol concentrations in 2016 and Round 1 2017 areconfirmation that repairs to the manholes have been successful.
· All licensed monitoring wells appeared to be in good condition during fieldwork and do not require repairor maintenance.
3.2 Recommended Way Forward
Based on results of the first round of IEL biannual groundwater monitoring conducted in May 2017, AECOMrecommends that groundwater containment and monitoring of those wells defined in the IE licence continuein accordance with EPA requirements in Round 2 2017.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater Monitoring Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM
Figures
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
SITELOCATION
1:15,000Job No.SCALE
BMC
North
CLIENT
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
JUN 2017
0
EO’H KF
60544194FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION PLAN
Ordnance Survey Ireland Licence No. EN 0001917©Ordnance Survey Ireland/Government of Ireland
DRAWN ILLUSTRATED CHECKED APPROVED DATE
REV.
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD, DOUGLAS, CORKT +353 (0)21 436 5006 www.aecom.com
PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2017RINGASKIDDY API, CORK, IRELAND
CORK
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
PROJECT
CLIENT DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 2 _ SITE LAYOUT PLANSHOWING MONITORING WELL LOCATIONSPFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS
NOTES
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2017RINGASKIDDY API, Co. CORK
DRAWN TRACED CHECKED APPROVED
BMC EO’H KFSCALE DRG NO.
DATE
REV
AS SHOWN
JUN 2017
60544194DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD, DOUGLAS, CORK
T +353 (0)21 4365006 WWW.AECOM.COMNOTE: THE MAP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
NOTE: THE MAP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
Hydraulic Containment Well
Groundwater Monitoring Well
Source Area
Down-gradient of Source Area
Containment Well Area
Down-gradient of Containment Well AreaOT
501501
205205
404404
702702
409409409
501
205
404
702
406406406
77
C2C2
C1C1
C2
C1
TOPO SLOPE
TOPO SLOPE
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
PROJECT
CLIENT DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 3 _ DRIFT GROUNDWATERCONTOUR MAP (NOVEMBER 2016)PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACUETICALS
NOTES
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2017RINGASKIDDY API, Co. CORK
DRAWN TRACED CHECKED APPROVED
BMC EO’H KFSCALE DRG NO.
DATE
REV
AS SHOWN
JUN 2017
60544194DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD, DOUGLAS, CORK
T +353 (0)21 4365006 WWW.AECOM.COMNOTE: THE MAP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENTNOTE: THE MAP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
Groundwater Flow Direction (Predicted) in Drift
Hydraulic Containment Well
Groundwater Monitoring Well (In Drift)
Groundwater Equipotential in Drift (m AOD)2m
77
C2C2
C1C1
C2
C1
1.691.69
7m7m
5m5m
4m4m
3m3m
2m2m
7m
5m
4m
3m
2m
6m6m6m
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
PROJECT
CLIENT DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 4 _ BEDROCK GROUNDWATERCONTOUR MAP (MAY 2017)PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS
NOTES
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2017RINGASKIDDY API, Co. CORK
DRAWN TRACED CHECKED APPROVED
BMC EO’H KFSCALE DRG NO.
DATE
REV
AS SHOWN
JUL 2017
60544194 DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD, DOUGLAS, CORK T +353 (0)21 4365006 WWW.AECOM.COMNOTE: THE MAP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENTNOTE: THE MAP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
Groundwater Flow Direction (Predicted) in Limestone
Hydraulic Containment Well
Groundwater Monitoring Well (In Limestone)
Groundwater Equipotential in Limestone (m AOD)2m
Inferred Groundwater Equipotential
409409
501501
205205
404404
702702
409
501
205
404
702
C2C2
C1C1
C2
C1
5m5m4m4m 3m3m 2m2m
1m1m
2m2m
3m3m
4m4m
5m5m
1.10
0.10
0.41
2.99
1.37
1.42
1.81
1m1m
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Page 1 of 1
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
50
100
150
200
250
May
05
Mar
06
Jan
07
Nov
07
Sep
08
Jul0
9
May
10
Mar
11
Jan
12
Nov
12
Sep
13
Jul1
4
May
15
Mar
16
Jan
17
Nov
17
(mg/
L)
Figure 5: Total VOC Concentration Trends in Wells 205 & 501 from May 2005 to May 2017
501
205
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Page 1 of 1
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
50
100
150
200
250
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure 6: BTEX Concentration Trends in Wells 205 & 501 from May 2005 to May 2017
501
205
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Prepared by: DHChecked by: EOH Figure 7A Page 1 of 2
AECOM Ireland Limited
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
May-96 May-97 May-98 May-99 May-00 May-01 May-02 May-03 May-04 May-05
Mas
sR
emov
ed(k
g)
Solvent Mass Recovery from June 1996 to May 2005
R Wells
C Wells
RC Wells
Several R series wells abandoned as pumping wellsin September 1999 due to southern UST farm excavations
RC wells ceased pumping in May 2005and decommissioned in May 2007
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH Figure 7B Page 2 of 2
AECOM Ireland Limited
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Apr-05 Apr-06 Mar-07 Mar-08 Feb-09 Feb-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Dec-12 Dec-13 Nov-14 Nov-15 Oct-16 Oct-17
Mas
sR
emov
ed(k
g)
Solvent Mass Recovery from May 2005 to May 2017
C Wells
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater Monitoring Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM
Tables
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:30
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 1 Monitoring Inventory May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 1 of 8
MonitoringPoint Date Sampled VOCs and
Alcohols Metals Ammonia asN Major Ions pH* Electrical
Conductivity* Temperature*
7 16-May-17 X X X X X X X205 15-May-17 X X X X X X X404 15-May-17 X X X X X X X409 16-May-17 X X X X X X X501 17-May-17 X X X X X X X702 15-May-17 X X X X X X XC1 16-May-17 X X X X X X X406 16-May-17 X X X X X X X
Notes:VOCs and Alcohols - Standard VOC suite plus: Acetone, Methanol, Ethanol, Iso-Propanol, Tetrahydrofuran, Cyclohexane and Ethyl AcetateMetals - Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel and Zinc
ns - indicates not sampledX - indicates parameter scheduled for analysis~ - indicates parameter not scheduled for analysis
Major Ions - Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, Sulphate, Nitrate as NO3, Nitrite as NO2, Carbonate Alkalinity (as CaCO3),
* Not possible to use a field water quality meter, measurements of pH and electrical conductivity were recorded in the laboratory, temperature wasmeasured with a spirit thermometer.
AECOM Ireland Limited
J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 2 Well Inventory May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 2 of 8
MonitoringPoint
YearInstalled
ScreenedInterval
ING Easting(m)
ING Northing(m)
Top of Well CasingElevation
m OD
InternalDiameter
mm
Total DepthInstalled
m bct
ScreenLength
m
Top ofScreenm bct
Base ofScreenm bct
Well Completion MaintenanceRequired
7 pre-1994 Drift 176761.661 64750.902 6.102 50 na na na na Raised metal cover No205 1994 Limestone 176708.854 64861.865 3.535 50 15.15* 3.0 12.15 15.15 Flush metal cover No404 1995 Limestone 176705.545 64826.362 5.355 50 14.75* 3.0 11.75 14.75 Flush metal cover No409 1995 Limestone 176661.556 64699.725 12.133 50 18.50 5.5 13.00 18.50 Flush metal cover No501 1996 Limestone 176632.164 64787.032 12.314 50 na na na na Flush metal cover No702 2000 Limestone 177008.219 64772.403 9.522 50 13.93 5.0 8.93 13.93 Flush metal cover NoC1 1995 Limestone 176775.718 64834.784 4.840 na na na na na Concrete chamber No406 1995 Limestone 176811.462 64917.570 3.562 50.000 15.360 6.000 9.360 15.360 Raised metal cover No
Notes:ING: Irish national grid co-ordinates m bct: Metres below casing topm OD: Metres above Ordnance Datum na: Not applicable/not available* Actual well depth from top of casing to end cap (m bct) - November 2014
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 3 Field Notes, May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 3 of 8
MonitoringPoint
Total DepthMeasured
m bct
Depth toGroundwater
m bctpH* EC* mS/cm
@ 25°CTemperature
oC
LNAPL/DNAPL
DetectedComments
7 5.51 4.41 7.03 563 12.5 No Silty black water, no odour, dry at 3 L205 15.56 2.16 7.50 831 14.5 No Clear and colourless water, hydrogen sulphide odour404 14.80 3.94 7.35 841 13.5 No Clear and colourless water, solvent odour409 18.10 10.32 7.46 482 13.1 No Slightly cloudy brown water, no odour501 12.36 9.32 6.82 575 13.8 No Black suspended solids, hydrogen sulphide odour702 13.94 8.42 7.50 1195 13.0 No Cloudy brown water, no odourC1 - 4.43 7.69 1141 14.0 No Clear water slight hydrogen sulphide odour. Well pumping.406 15.340 2.25 7.70 637 13.0 No Clear water, weak hydrogen sulphide odour.
Notes:m bct:- Metres below casing top mS/cm: Microsiemens per centimetre LNAP: light non-aqueous phase liquid (floating layer).-: not measured oC: Degrees Celsius DNAPL: dense non-aqueous phase liquid (sinking layer).na: not applicable/not available EC: Electrical Conductivity NEC: no evidence of contamination.
*: Measurements taken in laboratory
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 4 Groundwater Elevations, May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 4 of 8
MonitoringPoint
Total DepthMeasured
m bct
Total DepthInstalled
m bct
ScreenLength
m
Thickness ofSiltm
% of ScreenBlocked by
Silt
Top of WellCasing Elevation
m OD
Depth toGroundwater
m bct
GroundwaterElevation
m OD
7 5.51 na na - - 6.10 4.41 1.69205 15.56 15.54 3.0 -0.02 -1% 3.54 2.16 1.37404 14.80 14.77 3.0 -0.03 -1% 5.36 3.94 1.42409 18.10 18.50 5.5 0.40 7% 12.13 10.32 1.81501 12.36 na na - - 12.31 9.32 2.99702 13.94 13.93 5.0 -0.01 0% 9.52 8.42 1.10C1 - na na - - 4.84 4.43 0.41406 15.34 15.36 6.00 0.02 0.00 3.56 2.25 1.32
Notes:m OD: Metres above Ordnance Datumm bct:- Metres below casing top-: not measuredna: not applicable/not available
AECOM Ireland Limited
J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 5 Volatile Organic Compounds (mg/L), May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 5 of 8
Additional Well7 205 404 409 501 702 C1 406
May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17Dichlorodifluoromethane ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002MTBE 0.01 9.2 0.03 <0.0001 0.0176 0.0166 <0.0001 0.0082 <0.0001 0.018 0.012Chloromethane ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Vinyl Chloride 0.000375 0.005 ---- <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001Bromomethane ---- ---- ---- <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Chloroethane ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Trichlorofluoromethane ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,1-Dichloroethene ---- 0.01 0.03 1 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Dichloromethane 0.015 1 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.000375B 0.020* 0.03 1 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,1-Dichloroethane ---- 0.9 ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.000375B 0.02* 0.03 1 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0032,2-Dichloropropane ---- 0.08** ---- <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Bromochloromethane ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Chloroform ---- 0.4 0.012 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,1,1-Trichloroethane ---- 0.03 0.5 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,1-Dichloropropene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Carbon Tetrachloride ---- 0.01 0.02 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,2-Dichloroethane 0.0225 0.4 0.3 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Benzene 0.00075 0.03 0.001 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.0033 <0.0005 0.0263 <0.0005Trichloroethene 0.0075 0.5 0.07, 0.014 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,2-Dichloropropane ---- 0.08** ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Dibromomethane ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Bromodichloromethane ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Toluene 0.525 1 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.029 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,1,2-Trichloroethane ---- 0.13 ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Tetrachloroethene 0.0075 0.4 0.001, 0.04 2 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,3-Dichloropropane ---- 0.08** ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Dibromochloromethane ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,2-Dibromoethane ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Chlorobenzene ---- 0.18 0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Ethyl Benzene ---- 0.15 0.01 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 1.075 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001m,p-Xylene ---- 0.07***** 0.01 5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 8.454 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001o-Xylene ---- 0.07***** 0.01 5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.439 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Styrene ---- 0.3 ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Bromoform ---- 0.63 ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Isopropylbenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 0.018 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ---- ---- ---- <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004Bromobenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,2,3-Trichloropropane ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Propylbenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0032-Chlorotoluene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 0.013 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0034-Chlorotoluene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003tert-Butylbenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 0.017 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003sec-Butylbenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003p-Isopropyltoluene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,3-Dichlorobenzene ---- 0.05*** ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,4-Dichlorobenzene ---- 0.05*** ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003n-Butylbenzene ---- ---- ---- <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,2-Dichlorobenzene ---- 0.05*** 0.01 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.0031,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ---- ---- ---- <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ---- 0.01**** 0.0004 3 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Hexachlorobutadiene ---- ---- 0.0001 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003Naphthalene 0.000075A 0.07 0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0021,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ---- 0.01**** 0.0004 3 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003
Notes:
Underlined indicates result above GTV Indicates result above IGVA: GTV is for the sum of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene 1 IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenesB: GTV is for the sum of 1,2-dichloroethene isomers 2 Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene---- indicates no guideline value defined 3 IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenesns - indicates not sampled 4 Two IGVs are given for trichloroetheneDIV - Dutch Intervention Value 5 IGV is for the sum of xylenesItalics - indicates result above DIV *** DIV is for the sum of all dichlorobenzenes* DIV is for both cis and trans 1,2-dichloroethene **** DIV is for the sum of all trichlorobenezenes** DIV is for the sum of dichloropropanes ***** DIV is for the sum of all xylenes
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366, 2016
IEL Monitoring Point
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
Volatile OrganicCompounds GTV DIV IGV
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 6 Alcohols and Other Organics (mg/L), May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 6 of 8
Additional Well7 205 404 409 501 702 C1 406
May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17Methyl Alcohol --- 24 --- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Ethyl Alcohol --- --- --- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5i-Propyl Alcohol --- 31 --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1n-Propyl Alcohol --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1n-Butyl Alcohol --- 5.6 --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1n-Pentyl Alcohol --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1n-Hexyl Alcohol --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1n-Heptyl Alcohol --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1Methyl Acetate --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1Ethyl Acetate --- 15 --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1i-Propyl Acetate --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1n-Propyl Acetate --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1n-Butyl Acetate --- --- --- <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1Acetone --- --- --- <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Cyclohexane --- 15 --- <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.36 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrahydrofuran 0.115 0.3 --- <0.01 <0.01 0.052 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 0.14 0.011
Notes:
Underlined indicates result above GTVDIV - Dutch Intervention ValueItalics - indicates result above DIV
---- indicates no guideline value definedns - indicates not sampled
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, StatutoryInstrument No. 366, 2016
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection ofgroundwater
Indicates result above IGV
Monitoring PointAlcohols andOther Organics GTV DIV IGV
AECOM Ireland Limited
J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 7 Metals (mg/L), May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 7 of 8
Additional Well7 205 404 409 501 702 C1 406
May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17Arsenic 0.0075 0.06 0.01 0.013 0.028 0.019 <0.0025 0.015 <0.0025 0.006 0.009Cadmium --- 0.006 0.005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005Chromium 0.0375 0.03 0.03 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0015Copper --- 0.075 0.03 <0.007 <0.007 <0.007 <0.007 <0.007 <0.007 <0.007 <0.007Lead 0.0075 0.075 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Mercury 0.00075 0.0003 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Nickel --- 0.075 0.02 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002Zinc 0.075 0.8 0.1 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003
Notes:
Underlined indicates result above GTVDIV - Dutch Intervention ValueItalics - indicates result above DIV
---- indicates no guideline value definedns - indicates not sampled
Indicates result above IGV
Monitoring Point
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value,
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the
Metal GTV DIV IGV
AECOM Ireland Limited
J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Table 8 Major Ions (mg/L), May 2017 Final.xlsxPfizer API Ringaskiddy
Page 8 of 8
Additional Well7 205 404 409 501 702 C1 406
May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17 May-17Calcium --- --- 200 112 53 69 89 105 108 64 46Magnesium --- --- 50 8.4 6.2 3.5 4.6 3.0 31 18 9Potassium --- --- 5 3.1 2.0 2.8 1.0 3.5 12.8 8.6 8.7Sodium --- --- 150 17 124 102 21 30 114 168 68Chloride 24 - 187.5 --- 30 17 123 146 23 35 209 260 99Sulphate 187.5 --- 200 39 14 1.3 27 3.0 113 51 13Nitrate as NO3 37.5 --- 25 0.7 <0.2 <0.2 5.1 0.3 2.1 <0.2 <0.2Nitrite as NO2 0.375 --- 0.1 0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.05 <0.02AmmoniacalNitrogen
0.065 -0.175 --- 0.14* 0.4 0.83 1.42 <0.02 1.38 <0.02 1.19 0.98
CarbonateAlkalinity asCaCO3
--- --- --- <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
BicarbonateAlkalinity asCaCO3
--- --- --- 324 286 245 260 321 266 228 181
Total Alkalinity --- --- --- 324 286 245 260 321 266 228 181Iron --- --- 0.2 3.3 1.60 7.3 <0.02 5.4 <0.02 2.5 0.73Manganese --- --- 0.05 0.972 0.79 0.843 0.729 1.709 0.083 0.688 0.73Ionic Balance --- --- --- -5.0 -4.8 -4.8 -5.9 -3.8 -1.3 -2.9 -3.8
Notes:GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366, 2016Underlined indicates result above GTVDIV - Dutch Intervention ValueItalics - indicates result above DIVIGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
---- indicates no guideline value definedns - indicates not sampled*Ammonia as Ammonium, 0.15 mg/L
Monitoring Point
Indicates result above IGV
Major Ion GTV DIV IGV
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\May 2017 Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater Monitoring Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM
Appendix A - Historical Data and Concentration Plots withTime for Key Compounds (Figures A1 – A11)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 1 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A1: Benzene Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 IGV (0.001 mg/L)
GTV (0.00075 mg/L) DIV (0.03 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 2 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A2: Toluene Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 IGV (0.01 mg/L)
DIV (1 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 3 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A3: Ethylbenzene Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 IGV (0.01 mg/L)
DIV (0.15 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 4 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A4: Total Xylene Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 IGV (0.01 mg/L)
DIV (0.07 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 5 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A5: MTBE Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 IGV (0.03 mg/L)
DIV (9.2 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 6 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A6: THF Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 DIV (0.3 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 7 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A7: Cyclohexane Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 DIV (15 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 8 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A8: Acetone Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205 404
409 501 702
C1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 9 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A9: Methanol Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 DIV (24 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 10 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A10: Ethanol Concentration Trends in IEL Wells from May 2005 to May 2017
7 205 404
409 501 702
C1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A Page 11 of 11
AECOM Ireland LimitedJ:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
May
-05
Mar
-06
Jan-
07
Nov
-07
Sep-
08
Jul-0
9
May
-10
Mar
-11
Jan-
12
Nov
-12
Sep-
13
Jul-1
4
May
-15
Mar
-16
Jan-
17
Nov
-17
(mg/
L)
Figure A11: Isopropyl Alcohol Concentration Trends in IEL Wells May 2005 to May 2017
7 205
404 409
501 702
C1 DIV (31 mg/L)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 1 of 15
Dec-95 Jun-96 Dec-96 Jun-97 Dec-97 May-98 Jun-98 Jul-98 Nov-98 May-99 Nov-99 May-00 Nov-00 May-01 Nov-01Chloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromomethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane na na na na na na na na na na na na na na naDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015 - - - - - 0.005 0.005 0.005 - - - - - - -Acetone 0.83 - - - - 0.053 0.053 0.053 - - - - - - 0.028Carbon Disulphide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethane 0.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethene 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform 0.4 0.012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Butanone(MEK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloropropane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075 6.7 1.9 1.6 1.3 0.77 - - - 1.1 - 0.12 0.005 0.19 0.017 0.037trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Hexanone(MBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene 1 0.01 0.525 - - - - - - - - 0.016 - - - 0.003 -Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01 0.61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Styrene 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Xylenes(meta and para) 0.47 0.048 0.068 - 0.26 - - - - - - - 0.031 -o-Xylene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total Xylene 0.07 0.01 0.47 0.048 0.068 - 0.26 - - - - - - - 0.031 - -Freon 113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01 - - - - - 0.004 1.0 2.0 - 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.006 0.006 0.004Vinyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total BTEX 7.8 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.0 0 0 0 1.1 0 0.12 0.005 0.22 0.017 0.037Total VOCs 8.6 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.062 1.1 2.1 1.1 0.003 0.12 0.006 0.23 0.023 0.069
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
Methanol - - - - - - - - 2.2 - - - - - -Ethanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -iso-Propanol 1.5 1.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115 0.88 0.24 0.19 0.21 0.31 0.083 0.083 0.083 0.21 0.064 0.46 0.053 2.3 0.31 0.051Cyclohexane 15 0.040 0.030 0.040 - - 0.018 0.018 0.018 - 0.02 0.0 - 0.1 0.73 0.1Ethyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.030.02 0.000375
7Drift
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 2 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.030.02 0.000375
May-02 Nov-02 May-03 Nov-03 May-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na -- - - - - - - - - - - - 0.002 - 0.007- - - - - - - 0.01 - 0.01 0.014 0.012 - - -
0.009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.004 0.064 0.026 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.035- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.007- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.027- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.008- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.035- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na
0.002 0.003 0.004 0.002 - - - 0.002 0.001 - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na
0.004 0.064 0.026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0770.015 0.067 0.030 0.002 0 0 0 0.012 0.001 0.010 0.014 0.012 0.002 0 0.084
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 0.072 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.23
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 - - - - - 0.002 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7Drift
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 3 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.030.02 0.000375
Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 May-11 Nov-11 May-12 Nov-12 May-13 Nov-13 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - 0.0003 - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0003 0 0 0 0 0 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Drift7
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 4 of 15
Jul-94 Feb-95 Dec-95 Jun-96 Dec-96 Jun-97 Dec-97 May-98 Sep-98 Nov-98 May-99 Nov-01 May-02 Nov-02 May-03 Nov-03 May-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06Chloromethane - - - 0.24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromomethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.002Trichlorofluoromethane na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na naDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Acetone 33 32 220 110 100 - 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.015 -Carbon Disulphide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethane 0.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethene 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform 0.4 0.012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Butanone(MEK) - - - - 2.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK) 2.8 2.6 - - 2.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloropropane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075 - - - - 0.19 - - - - - - 0.093 - 0.17 0.075 0.030 - 0.023 0.035 - -trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Hexanone(MBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene 1 0.01 0.525 46 30 72 58 59 67 130 100 33 81 79 0.49 - 5.0 - 0.016 - 0.045 0.055 - -Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01 12 7.2 8.4 10 6.5 4.3 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.6 4.5 2.7 2.0 2.7 1.3 0.088 - 0.034 0.095 - -Styrene 0.3 0.37 - - - 0.26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Xylenes(meta and para) 58 33 35 49 31 20 20 19 19 17 26 14 10 15 7.7 1.0 - 1.9 1.1 - -o-Xylene 13 8.9 11 11 7.7 4.3 5.1 4.0 3.6 3.3 6.0 0.25 - 1.7 - 0.043 0.004 0.16 0.11 - -Total Xylene 0.07 0.01 71 42 46 60 39 24 25 23 23 20 32 14 10 17 7.7 1.0 0.004 2.1 1.2 - -Freon 113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.071 0.072 0.036 - 0.03Vinyl Acetate 0.23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total BTEX 129 79 126 128 104 96 159 126 59 105 116 18 12 25 9 1 0 2 1 0.00 0.00Total VOCs 165 114 346 238 209 96 213 126 59 105 116 18 12 25 9.1 1.2 0.075 2.2 1.4 0.015 0.032
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
Methanol - - - 315 - 14 - 6.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethanol - - - - - - 8.5 1.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - -iso-Propanol 141 183 - 77 57 6.4 35 6.8 - - 1.3 - - - - - - - - - -Tetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115 0.99 2.3 - 0.060 - 1.7 - 52 13 49 56 2.1 - 1.9 - 0.099 - - - 0.078 -Cyclohexane 15 8.4 1.9 0.63 0.92 0.63 0.30 - - - - - 0.99 0.76 0.51 0.32 - 0.045 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.019Ethyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
205LimestoneVolatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.0003750.030.02
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 5 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.0003750.030.02
Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 May-11 Nov-11 May-12 Nov-12 May-13 Nov-13 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 0.002 0.011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 0.61 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - 0.013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 0.024 - - 0.018 - 0.022 - - - 0.002 0.010 0.003 - 0.002 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 0.002 - - - 0.007 0.027 0.005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - 0.20 0.003 0.084 - - - - - - - 0.001 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.035 - 0.97 0.13 1.6 0.006 - - 0.065 0.019 0.033 - 0.054 - - - 0.005 - - -
0.006 - 0.004 0.035 0.069 0.007 0.037 - - - - - - - 0.002 - - - - - - -0.006 - 0.039 0.035 1.0 0.14 1.6 0.006 - - 0.065 0.019 0.033 - 0.033 - - - 0.005 - - -
- - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na0.026 - 0.046 0.078 0.15 1.8 14 9.2 4.9 0.59 0.23 0.31 0.24 0.15 0.11 0.40 0.11 0.058 0.29 0.081 0.027 0.018
- - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na0.01 0.03 0.04 0.04 1.26 0.15 1.77 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00 0 0 0.005 0 0 0
0.032 0.026 0.085 0.115 1.4 1.9 16 9.2 4.9 1.2 0.30 0.34 0.28 0.15 0.17 0.40 0.11 0.058 0.29 0.081 0.027 0.018
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 0.45 - - - 0.25 54 0.43 0.19 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.018 0.017 0.072 0.099 0.14 - 0.14 - 0.36 - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
205Limestone
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 6 of 15
Feb-95 Nov-95 Jun-96 Dec-96 Jun-97 Dec-97 May-98 Jun-98 Sep-98 Nov-98 May-99 Nov-99 May-00 Nov-00 May-01 Nov-01 Nov-01 May-02 May-02 Nov-02Chloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromomethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na naDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Acetone 42 210 36 130 21 81 70 32 - - 76 200 - - 0.22 - - - - -Carbon Disulphide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethane 0.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethene 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform 0.4 0.012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Butanone(MEK) - - - - - - - - - - - 27 - - - - - - - -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK) 5.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloropropane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075 0.57 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.070 0.092 0.092 0.14trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Hexanone(MBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene 1 0.01 0.525 52 110 61 52 81 150 130 110 67 99 110 110 130 130 0.31 0.81 0.77 0.23 0.16 5.8Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01 13 14 11 7.2 3.3 4.7 3.0 3.4 4.3 3.3 4.8 6.8 3.4 4.2 0.033 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0Styrene 0.3 - 0.51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Xylenes(meta and para) 58 65 48 31 17 23 19 16 20 23 26 30 15 19 0.15 13 11 11 11 14o-Xylene 15 16 12 9.1 3.9 6.0 4.6 3.7 4.4 4.4 6.1 6.9 3.6 4.2 0.025 1.0 0.91 0.67 0.64 2.5Total Xylene 0.07 0.01 73 81 60 40 21 29 24 20 24 27 32 37 19 23 0.18 14 12 12 12 17Freon 113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total BTEX 139 205 132 99 105 184 157 133 96 130 147 154 152 157 1 17 15 14 14 24Total VOCs 186 416 168 229 126 265 227 165 96 130 223 381 152 157 0.74 17 15 14 14 24
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
Methanol - - 711 - 15 9.2 5.4 - - 5.0 - - - - - - - - - -Ethanol - 1.2 - - - 38 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - -iso-Propanol 161 43 175 109 13 69 84 31 - - 69 - 6.9 - 24 - - - - -Tetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115 1.0 - - - 2.0 46 - 69 17 - 83 - - 3.1 0.058 1.8 1.6 0.88 0.71 3.4Cyclohexane 15 3.2 1.4 1.2 1.6 0.25 - - 0.36 - - - - - 2.6 0.015 0.97 1.3 0.94 0.82 0.63Ethyl Acetate na - - - - 294 164 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.030.02 0.000375
404Limestone
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 7 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.030.02 0.000375
May-03 May-03 Nov-03 Nov-03 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.12 0.007 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.16 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.15 0.13 - - - - - - - 0.016 0.009 - - - - - - 0.081 - 0.008- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.063 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.014 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.62 0.55 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.006 0.006- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15 13 1.8 1.8 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 0.40 1.9 0.072 - - - - - - 0.016 0.320.12 0.10 0.025 0.025 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.003 -15 13 1.8 1.8 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 0.40 1.9 0.072 - - - - - - 0.019 0.32- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - 0.01 - - 0.001 0.001 - 0.004 0.99 0.84 3.3 17.1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na
16 14 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 016 14 1.8 1.8 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 0.43 1.9 0.072 0.001 0.001 - 0.004 0.99 1.2 3.3 17
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.2 1.1 - - - - - - - 0.88 3.2 0.39 0.54 - - 1.0 4.0 14 84 710.70 0.61 0.40 0.40 - 1.52 2.52 3.52 4.52 0.35 0.36 0.19 0.052 0.081 0.14 0.27 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.13
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
404Limestone
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 8 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.030.02 0.000375
May-10 Nov-10 May-11 Nov-11 May-12 Nov-12 May-13 Nov-13 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - 0.004 - - - 0.005 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - 0.005 - - 0.003 0.024 - -- - - - - - - 0.013 - - - - 0.007 - -- - - - - - - 0.004 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.14 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.14 - - 0.065 0.052 0.036 - 0.023 0.007 0.014 0.0086 0.012 0.062 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.3 - - - - - - 0.001 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.15 - - - - - - - 0.0012 - - - 1.45 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.4 - - 0.013 0.064 0.080 - 0.005 1.5 0.003 0.003 - 10 - -0.014 - - - 0.004 0.005 - - - - - - 0.005 - -2.454 - - 0.013 0.068 0.085 - 0.005 1.5 0.003 0.003 - 10 - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na17.2 14.9 4.2 4.2 2.1 0.85 0.38 0.27 0.18 0.10 0.066 0.55 0.14 0.031 0.017na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
5.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.53 0.017 0.012 0.012 11.9 0 031 15 4.2 4.3 2.2 1.0 0.38 0.32 1.7 0.115 0.078 0.57 12 0.17 0.017
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.75 1.3 0.13 0.54 - - 0.05 - - 0.017 0.017 0.057 0.14 0.062 0.0520.32 0.75 - - 0.29 0.20 0.13 0.081 0.23 - - - 0.17 0.14 -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
404Limestone
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 9 of 15
May-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 May-11 Nov-11 May-12 Nov-12 May-13 Nov-13 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17Chloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - -Bromomethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015 - - - - - - - - - - 0.005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Acetone - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Disulphide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na1,1-Dichloroethane 0.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethene 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform 0.4 0.012 0.001 - 0.001 0.007 0.005 0.008 0.009 0.022 0.007 0.003 - - - - - 0.002 - - 0.004 - - - - 0.002 - - 0.0021,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Butanone(MEK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - 0.014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK) - - - - - - - - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na1,2-Dichloropropane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Hexanone(MBK) - - - - - - - - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene 1 0.01 0.525 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Styrene 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Xylenes(meta and para) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -o-Xylene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total Xylene 0.07 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Freon 113 - - - - - - - - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na naMethyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01 - 0.014 0.008 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.002 0.002 - - - - 0.001 - - - - - -Vinyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na naTotal BTEX - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total VOCs 0.001 0.014 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.008 0.009 0.022 0.007 0.003 0.019 - - - 0.002 0.004 - - 0.004 - 0.001 - - 0.002 - - 0.002
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
Methanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -iso-Propanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115 - - - - 0.062 - - - - - 0.21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Cyclohexane 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.030.02 0.000375
409Limestone
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 10 of 15
Dec-96 Jun-97 Dec-97 May-98 May-98 Jul-98 Sep-98 Nov-98 Feb-99 May-99 May-00 Nov-00 May-01 Nov-01 May-02 Nov-02 May-03 Nov-03 May-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07Chloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromomethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015 - 8.1 - - - - - 5.5 - - - - - - - 2.2 - - - - - - - - -Acetone - - - - - - 37 - - 100 - - 53 - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Disulphide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethane 0.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethene 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform 0.4 0.012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Butanone(MEK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloropropane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Hexanone(MBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene 1 0.01 0.525 65 140 220 220 190 210 270 210 180 150 230 200 72 58 83 87 120 85 79 69 84 50 77 65 11Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01 7.0 7.3 7.3 25 - 9.7 14 8.4 13 7.3 6.6 8.1 3.4 4.9 7.3 7.2 7.1 6.7 12 11 11 6.3 9.2 9.4 3.2Styrene 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Xylenes(meta and para) 34 36 33 120 60 42 62 50 68 35 29 40 17 25 33 32 32 31 52 49 46 29 42 42 27o-Xylene 9.9 9.7 9.6 40 16 12 17 12 17 9.5 7.4 11 4.2 5.7 8.8 8.3 7.5 7.5 12 12 12 7.5 9.9 11 3.9Total Xylene 0.07 0.01 44 46 43 160 76 54 79 62 85 45 36 51 21 31 42 40 40 39 64 61 58 37 52 53 31Freon 113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total BTEX 116 193 270 405 266 274 363 280 278 202 273 259 97 94 132 135 167 130 155 141 153 93 138 127 45Total VOCs 116 201 270 405 266 274 400 286 278 302 273 259 150 94 132 137 167 130 155 141 153 93 138 127 45
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
Methanol 154 609 594 61 347 80 165 83 371 61 6.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.6 -Ethanol 342 141 542 57 353 114 194 - 9.3 - 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -iso-Propanol 276 161 347 399 630 61 159 31 27 304 135 15 226 - 1.5 2.8 2.6 - - - - 0.50 - 0.30 -Tetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115 - 3.0 - 284 3,230 32 65 - 66 62 - 24 - - - 3.5 - - - - - 0.80 - - -Cyclohexane 15 7.4 3.0 - - - - - - - - - 7.4 1.8 3.3 4.0 2.8 2.3 3.9 5.0 - 3.8 2.2 4.9 3.3 1.6Ethyl Acetate 2.0 - - 2,040 2,430 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
501Limestone
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
0.030.02
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.000375
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 11 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
0.030.02
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.000375
Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 May-11 Nov-11 May-12 Nov-12 May-13 Nov-13 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.036 0.020 0.014 0.027 0.018 0.017- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.044 0.021 0.011 0.022 0.010 0.013- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.163 0.117 0.068 0.114 0.013 0.018- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.038 0.031 0.012 0.031 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 1.0 0.68 0.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.048 - - -
0.42 3.2 - 71 12 - - - 4.8 - - - - - 0.081 8.2 4.7 - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 1.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 0.081 0.062 0.036 0.029 0.017 0.040 0.069 0.031 0.027 0.024 0.066 0.051 0.030 0.023 0.011 0.02 0.003- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
65 110 100 29 16 32 18 6.5 25 39 45 10 2.6 3.2 38 18 23 0.33 0.035 0.029- - - 0.022 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8.4 11 8.5 11 6.4 8.9 5.1 3.1 10 27 14 10 7.2 9.0 7.5 5.8 2.8 3.0 0.61 1.1- - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.6 1.6 - - - 0.010 -
45 60 41 27 15 39 43 46 44 63 62 58 33 40 53 34 44 25 7.6 8.511 14 9.4 14 7.4 14 11 13 10 14 13 9.4 5.5 6.4 9.4 5.8 8.8 1.9 0.28 0.4456 74 50 42 22 53 54 59 54 77 76 67 39 46 63 39 53 27 7.8 8.9- - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - 0.28 0.44 0.035 0.029 - 0.146 - 0.019 0.006 - 0.074 0.26 0.036 4.8 0.18 0.11 0.008- - - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
129 195 159 81 45 94 77 69 90 143 135 87 48 58 108 63 78 30 8.5 10130 199 161 153 58 94 77 69 95 143 135 87 48 60 110 72 88 31 8.7 10
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 86 - - - -- - - - 0.47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 99 11 - - - 3.3 - - - - - - 2.2 1.9 - - -
8.0 - 1.6 17 15 - - - 0.20 - - - - - 0.358 0.98 2.1 0.048 - 0.0393.4 2.7 2.5 1.3 2.4 2.2 10 2.2 2.1 4.8 3.5 1.9 2.0 2.5 2.0 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.8 0.36- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
501Limestone
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 12 of 15
Feb-98 May-00 Dec-00 May-01 Nov-01 May-02 Nov-02 May-03 Nov-03 May-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09Chloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromomethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na -Dichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Acetone - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Disulphide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethane 0.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethene 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform 0.4 0.012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Butanone(MEK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na1,2-Dichloropropane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Hexanone(MBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene 1 0.01 0.525 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.003Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Styrene 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Xylenes(meta and para) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -o-Xylene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total Xylene 0.07 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Freon 113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - naMethyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.006 - - - - - -Vinyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - naTotal BTEX - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.003Total VOCs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.003
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
Methanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -iso-Propanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Cyclohexane 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
702Limestone
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
0.030.02
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.000375
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 13 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
0.030.02
Volatile Organic Compound DIV IGV GTV
0.000375
Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 May-11 Nov-11 May-12 Nov-12 May-13 Nov-13 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.009 0.022 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.003 0.006 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.018 0.031 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.004 0.005 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.022 0.036 - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - 0.034 0.064 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.034 0.064 - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
702Limestone
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 14 of 15
Jun-96 Dec-96 Jun-97 Dec-97 May-98 Sep-98 Nov-98 May-99 Nov-99 May-00 Nov-00 May-01 Nov-01 May-02 Nov-02 May-03 Nov-03 May-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07Chloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromomethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na naDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Acetone 1.7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Disulphide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethane 0.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethene 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform 0.4 0.012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Butanone(MEK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK) - 0.083 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloropropane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075 6.5 5.2 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.1 3 - 3.2 3.5 2.7 - 1.2 3.1 1.6 2.1 1.5 0.84 - 0.36 0.22 0.58 0.41 - -trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Hexanone(MBK) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene 1 0.01 0.525 5.2 3.8 0.23 1.5 0.83 0.22 0.63 - - - 2.1 - - - 0.22 - - - - - 0.10 - - - -Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01 2.9 1.9 0.51 0.94 0.44 0.39 0.71 0.069 0.73 0.34 - - 0.018 0.096 0.060 - - - - - 0.15 - - - -Styrene 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Xylenes(meta and para) 13 7.0 3.2 6.4 5.8 3.4 7.6 2.0 8.0 6.7 9.3 - 0.23 5.2 3.2 0.81 0.41 - - 0.008 0.88 - - - -o-Xylene 2.1 1.4 0.43 0.81 0.62 0.27 0.58 0.10 0.40 - 0.74 - - - 0.14 - - - - - 0.24 - - - -Total Xylene 0.07 0.01 15 8.4 3.6 7.2 6.4 3.7 8.2 2.1 8.4 6.7 10 - 0.23 5.2 3.3 0.81 0.41 - - - 1.1 - - - -Freon 113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.002 0.002 - - 0.019 0.013 0.007Vinyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total BTEX 30 19 7.3 13 10 6.4 13 2.2 12 11 15 0 1.4 8.4 5.2 2.9 1.9 0.84 0 0.36 1.6 0.58 0.41 0 0Total VOCs 31 19 7.3 13 10 6.4 13 2.2 12 11 15 0 1.4 8.4 5.2 2.9 1.9 0.84 0.002 0.37 1.6 0.58 0.43 0.013 0.007
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
Methanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -iso-Propanol - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.3 - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115 2.2 0.9 0.68 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.1 4.6 13 8.6 12 1.9 4.8 3.9 1.6 2.8 1.4 0.8 0.4 1.0 1.2 0.40 0.39 0.29 0.28Cyclohexane 15 0.11 0.10 0.040 - - - - - - - 0.66 0.069 0.054 0.80 0.56 0.37 0.51 0.14 0.032 0.12 0.30 - 0.034 0.011 0.036Ethyl Acetate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
LimestoneC1
Volatile Organic Compound IGVDIV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
0.030.02
GTV
0.000375
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Prepared by: BMCChecked by: EOH
Appendix A - Historical Data for Key Compounds (mg/L) Page 15 of 15
Chloromethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneBromomethaneVinyl Chloride 0.005 0.000375IsopropylbenzenePropylbenzeneChloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichloromethane 1 0.01 0.015AcetoneCarbon Disulphide1,1-Dichloroethane 0.91,1-Dichloroethene 0.01trans-1,2-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-DichloroetheneBromoformChloroform 0.4 0.0121,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 0.003 0.00225Butanone(MEK)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.3 0.5Carbon Tetrachloride 0.01Bromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-Pentanone(MIBK)1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene 0.5 0.01 0.0075Tetrachloroethene 0.04 0.01 0.0075Dibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzene 0.03 0.001 0.00075trans-1,3-Dichloropropene2-Hexanone(MBK)1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneToluene 1 0.01 0.525Chlorobenzene 0.18 0.001Ethylbenzene 0.15 0.01Styrene 0.3Xylenes(meta and para)o-XyleneTotal Xylene 0.07 0.01Freon 113Methyl t-butyl ether 0.03 0.01Vinyl AcetateTotal BTEXTotal VOCs
Alcohols and VOA Compounds
MethanolEthanoliso-PropanolTetrahydrofuran 0.3 0.115Cyclohexane 15Ethyl Acetate
- Indicates result below reporting limit
IGV: EPA Interim Guideline ValueGTV: Groundwater Threshold ValueIndicates result above DIV
Indicates result above IGVIndicates result above GTV
Volatile Organic Compound IGVDIV
DIV: Dutch Intervention Value
0.030.02
GTV
0.000375
May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 May-11 Nov-11 May-12 Nov-12 May-13 Nov-13 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
na na - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 0.62 - - - - - 0.057 0.19 0.17 - 0.23 0.11 0.09 0.058 0.092 0.098 0.0007 0.026- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 0.004 0.01 - - 0.004 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - 0.016 - - - 0.007 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 0.012 - - 0.004 - - - - - 0.115 - - - 0.30 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 0.012 - - 0.004 - - - - - 0.12 - - - - - -- - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
0.018 0.016 0.053 0.29 0.023 0.015 0.83 0.47 0.12 0.043 0.020 0.045 0.010 0.009 0.017 0.034 0.049 0.022 0.018- - na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na0 0.62 0.004 0.022 0 0 0.008 0.057 0.19 0.17 0 0.23 0.24 0.088 0.058 0.092 0.105 0.001 0.026
0.018 0.65 0.062 0.32 0.023 0.015 0.84 0.53 0.31 0.21 0.020 0.27 0.25 0.10 0.074 0.13 0.45 0.023 0.044
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.21 0.25 0.50 0.72 - - - 0.092 - - 0.054 0.10 - 0.099 0.079 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.140.033 0.028 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LimestoneC1
AECOM Ireland Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals\60544194 Pfizer Ringaskiddy GWM 2017\Technical\Round 1 (May 2017)\Report Attachments\IEL Final Issue 3\IEL Trends Final.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater Monitoring Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM
Appendix B - Laboratory Certificates
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Unit 3 Deeside Point
Zone 3
Deeside Industrial Park
Deeside
AECOM
Attention :
Date :
Your reference :
Our reference :
Location :
Date samples received :
Status :
Issue :
Seven samples were received for analysis on 18th May, 2017 of which seven were scheduled for analysis. Please find attached our Test Report
which should be read with notes at the end of the report and should include all sections if reproduced. Interpretations and opinions are outside the
scope of any accreditation, and all results relate only to samples supplied.
All analysis is carried out on as received samples and reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected.
Paul Boden BSc
Project Manager
60544194
18th May, 2017
Final report
Compiled By:
Test Report 17/8821 Batch 1
Edel O'Hannelly
24th July, 2017
1
Exova Jones Environmental
CH5 2UA
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 833780
Fax: +44 (0) 1244 833781
4th Floor Adelphi Plaza
Adelphi Centre
Georges Street Upper
Dun Laoghaire, Co Dublin
Ireland
Registered Address : Exova (UK) Ltd, Lochend Industrial Estate, Newbridge, Midlothian, EH28 8PL
QF-PM 3.1.1 v16Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 1 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Client Name: Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle
JE Job No.: 17/8821 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03
J E Sample No. 1-6 12-17 36-41 42-47 54-59 66-71 78-83
Sample ID 7 205 404 406 409 702 C1
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G
Sample Date 16/05/2017 16/05/2017 15/05/2017 16/05/2017 16/05/2017 15/05/2017 16/05/2017
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date of Receipt 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017
Dissolved Arsenic # 13.0 27.8 19.3 9.2 <2.5 <2.5 6.4 <2.5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Cadmium # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Calcium # 111.5 52.9 68.6 45.8 89.1 108.1 64.2 <0.2 mg/l TM30/PM14
Total Dissolved Chromium # <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Copper # <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 ug/l TM30/PM14
Total Dissolved Iron # 3263 1599 7296 725 <20 <20 2456 <20 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Lead # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Magnesium # 8.4 6.2 3.5 8.7 4.6 31.0 18.1 <0.1 mg/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Manganese # 972 787 843 727 729 83 688 <2 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Mercury # <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Nickel # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Potassium # 3.1 2.0 2.8 8.7 1.0 12.8 8.6 <0.1 mg/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Sodium # 16.5 124.3 102.2 67.8 21.1 114.2 167.7 <0.1 mg/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Zinc # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM30/PM14
Alcohols/Acetates
Methyl Alcohol (Methanol) <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ug/l TM83/PM10
Ethyl Alcohol (Ethanol) <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ug/l TM83/PM10
i-Propyl Alcohol (Isopropanol) <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Propyl Alcohol <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Butyl Alcohol <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Pentyl Alcohol <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Hexyl Alcohol <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Heptyl Alcohol <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
Methyl Acetate <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
Ethyl Acetate <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
i-Propyl Acetate <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Propyl Acetate <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Butyl Acetate <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
Acetone <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ug/l TM83/PM10
Cyclohexane <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ug/l TM83/PM10
Tetrahydrofuran <10 <10 52 11 <10 <10 139 <10 ug/l TM83/PM10
Sulphate as SO4 # 39.2 14.3 1.3 12.5 26.9 113.4 50.6 <0.5 mg/l TM38/PM0
Chloride # 17.0 122.8 146.1 98.7 23.1 208.6 260.0 <0.3 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrate as NO3 # 0.7 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 5.1 2.1 <0.2 <0.2 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrite as NO2 # 0.10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.05 <0.02 mg/l TM38/PM0
Ammoniacal Nitrogen as NH3 # 0.48 1.01 1.73 1.19 <0.03 <0.03 1.44 <0.03 mg/l TM38/PM0
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 # 324 286 245 181 260 266 228 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 324 286 245 181 260 266 228 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60544194
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 2 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Client Name: Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle
JE Job No.: 17/8821 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03
J E Sample No. 1-6 12-17 36-41 42-47 54-59 66-71 78-83
Sample ID 7 205 404 406 409 702 C1
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G
Sample Date 16/05/2017 16/05/2017 15/05/2017 16/05/2017 16/05/2017 15/05/2017 16/05/2017
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date of Receipt 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017
Electrical Conductivity @25C # 563 831 841 637 482 1195 1141 <2 uS/cm TM76/PM0
pH # 7.03 7.50 7.35 7.70 7.46 7.50 7.69 <0.01 pH units TM73/PM0
Total Cations 7.05 8.61 8.23 6.17 5.77 13.24 12.21 <0.00 mmolc/l TM30/PM14
Total Anions 7.79 9.48 9.05 6.66 6.49 13.60 12.95 <0.00 mmolc/l TM0/PM0
% Cation Excess -4.99 -4.81 -4.75 -3.82 -5.87 -1.34 -2.94 % TM0/PM0
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60544194
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 3 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Client Name: Report : Misc
Reference:
Location: Solids: V=60g VOC jar, J=250g glass jar, T=plastic tub
Contact:
JE Job No.: 17/8821
J E Sample No. 1-6
Sample ID 7
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V H HN P G
Sample Date 16/05/2017
Sample Type Ground Water
Batch Number 1
Date of Receipt 18/05/2017
Sample Temperature 6.2 <0.1 Degrees C NONE/NONE
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60544194
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 4 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Client Name: VOC Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact:
JE Job No.: 17/8821
J E Sample No. 1-6 12-17 36-41 42-47 54-59 66-71 78-83
Sample ID 7 205 404 406 409 702 C1
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G V H HN P G
Sample Date 16/05/2017 16/05/2017 15/05/2017 16/05/2017 16/05/2017 15/05/2017 16/05/2017
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date of Receipt 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 18/05/2017
VOC MS
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # <0.1 17.6 16.6 12.3 <0.1 <0.1 18.0 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Vinyl Chloride # <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromomethane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichlorofluoromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1 DCE) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dichloromethane (DCM) # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroform # <2 <2 <2 <2 2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloropropene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Carbon tetrachloride # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 26.3 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichloroethene (TCE) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromomethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromodichloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromoethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chlorobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene # <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Styrene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromoform # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Isopropylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichloropropane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Propylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
tert-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
sec-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Isopropyltoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
n-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Naphthalene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 100 104 107 100 103 100 100 <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 99 97 100 101 100 101 <0 % TM15/PM10
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60544194
QF-PM 3.1.4 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 5 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Notification of Deviating Samples
J E
Job
No.
Batch Depth J E Sample
No.Analysis Reason
Please note that only samples that are deviating are mentioned in this report. If no samples are listed it is because none were deviating.
Only analyses which are accredited are recorded as deviating if set criteria are not met.
Contact:
Sample ID
Client Name: AECOM
Reference:
Location:
No deviating sample report results for job 17/8821
Exova Jones Environmental
60544194
Edel O'Hannelly
QF-PM 3.1.11 v3 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 6 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No.:
SOILS
DEVIATING SAMPLES
SURROGATES
DILUTIONS
BLANKS
NOTE
NOTES TO ACCOMPANY ALL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
Please note we are only MCERTS accredited (UK soils only) for sand, loam and clay and any other matrix is outside our scope of accreditation.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
17/8821
WATERS
It is assumed that you have taken representative samples on site and require analysis on a representative subsample. Stones will generally be
included unless we are requested to remove them.
All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected. Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C unless
otherwise stated. Moisture content for CEN Leachate tests are dried at 105°C ±5°C.
Surrogate compounds are added during the preparation process to monitor recovery of analytes. However low recovery in soils is often due to peat,
clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
limits for most organic methods are 70 - 130% and for VOCs are 50 - 150%. When surrogate recoveries are outside the performance criteria but
the associated AQC passes this is assumed to be due to matrix effect. Results are not surrogate corrected.
A dilution suffix indicates a dilution has been performed and the reported result takes this into account. No further calculation is required.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
Please note we are not a UK Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) Approved Laboratory .
If you have not already done so, please send us a purchase order if this is required by your company.
The calculation of Pyrite content assumes that all oxidisable sulphides present in the sample are pyrite. This may not be the case. The calculation
may be an overesitimate when other sulphides such as Barite (Barium Sulphate) are present.
Where analytes have been found in the blank, the sample will be treated in accordance with our laboratory procedure for dealing with contaminated
blanks.
ISO17025 accreditation applies to surface water and groundwater and usually one other matrix which is analysis specific, any other liquids are
outside our scope of accreditation.
As surface waters require different sample preparation to groundwaters the laboratory must be informed of the water type when submitting samples.
Where appropriate please make sure that our detection limits are suitable for your needs, if they are not, please notify us immediately.
Data is only reported if the laboratory is confident that the data is a true reflection of the samples analysed. Data is only reported as accredited when
all the requirements of our Quality System have been met. In certain circumstances where all the requirements of the Quality System have not been
met, for instance if the associated AQC has failed, the reason is fully investigated and documented. The sample data is then evaluated alongside
the other quality control checks performed during analysis to determine its suitability. Following this evaluation, provided the sample results have not
been effected, the data is reported but accreditation is removed. It is a UKAS requirement for data not reported as accredited to be considered
indicative only, but this does not mean the data is not valid.
Where possible, and if requested, samples will be re-extracted and a revised report issued with accredited results. Please do not hesitate to contact
the laboratory if further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation.
Samples must be received in a condition appropriate to the requested analyses. All samples should be submitted to the laboratory in suitable
containers with sufficient ice packs to sustain an appropriate temperature for the requested analysis. If this is not the case you will be informed and
any test results that may be compromised highlighted on your deviating samples report.
Where an MCERTS report has been requested, you will be notified within 48 hours of any samples that have been identified as being outside our
MCERTS scope. As validation has been performed on clay, sand and loam, only samples that are predominantly these matrices, or combinations
of them will be within our MCERTS scope. If samples are not one of a combination of the above matrices they will not be marked as MCERTS
accredited.
Negative Neutralization Potential (NP) values are obtained when the volume of NaOH (0.1N) titrated (pH 8.3) is greater than the volume of HCl (1N)
to reduce the pH of the sample to 2.0 - 2.5. Any negative NP values are corrected to 0.
Where a CEN 10:1 ZERO Headspace VOC test has been carried out, a 10:1 ratio of water to wet (as received) soil has been used.
All samples will be discarded one month after the date of reporting, unless we are instructed to the contrary.
% Asbestos in Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) is determined by reference to HSG 264 The Survey Guide - Appendix 2 : ACMs in buildings
listed in order of ease of fibre release.
QF-PM 3.1.9 v34Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 7 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No.:
#
SA
B
DR
M
NA
NAD
ND
NDP
SS
SV
W
+
++
*
AD
CO
LOD/LOR
ME
NFD
BS
LB
N
TB
OC
17/8821
ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS USED
ISO17025 (UKAS) accredited - UK.
Trip Blank Sample
AQC Sample
Suspected carry over
Limit of Detection (Limit of Reporting) in line with ISO 17025 and MCERTS
Not applicable
No Asbestos Detected.
Dilution required.
ISO17025 (SANAS) accredited - South Africa.
Outside Calibration Range
No Fibres Detected
Result outside calibration range, results should be considered as indicative only and are not accredited.
Results expressed on as received basis.
Surrogate recovery outside performance criteria. This may be due to a matrix effect.
MCERTS accredited.
Matrix Effect
Blank Sample
Client Sample
No Determination Possible
Indicates analyte found in associated method blank.
None Detected (usually refers to VOC and/SVOC TICs).
Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C
Analysis subcontracted to a Jones Environmental approved laboratory.
AQC failure, accreditation has been removed from this result, if appropriate, see 'Note' on previous page.
Calibrated against a single substance
QF-PM 3.1.9 v34Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 8 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No: 17/8821
Test Method No. Description
Prep Method
No. (if
appropriate)
Description
ISO
17025
(UKAS/S
ANAS)
MCERTS
(UK soils
only)
Analysis done
on As Received
(AR) or Dried
(AD)
Reported on
dry weight
basis
TM0 Not available PM0 No preparation is required.
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis. Yes
TM30
Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7, 6010B and BS EN ISO
11885 2009
PM14Analysis of waters and leachates for metals by ICP OES/ICP MS. Samples are filtered for
dissolved metals and acidified if required.
TM30
Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7, 6010B and BS EN ISO
11885 2009
PM14Analysis of waters and leachates for metals by ICP OES/ICP MS. Samples are filtered for
dissolved metals and acidified if required.Yes
TM38Soluble Ion analysis using the Thermo Aquakem Photometric Automatic Analyser.
Modified US EPA methods 325.2, 375.4, 365.2, 353.1, 354.1PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM73Modified US EPA methods 150.1 and 9045D and BS1377:1990. Determination of pH by
Metrohm automated probe analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM75Modified US EPA method 310.1. Determination of Alkalinity by Metrohm automated
titration analyser.PM0 No preparation is required.
TM75Modified US EPA method 310.1. Determination of Alkalinity by Metrohm automated
titration analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM76Modified US EPA method 120.1. Determination of Specific Conductance by Metrohm
automated probe analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix
QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 9 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No: 17/8821
Test Method No. Description
Prep Method
No. (if
appropriate)
Description
ISO
17025
(UKAS/S
ANAS)
MCERTS
(UK soils
only)
Analysis done
on As Received
(AR) or Dried
(AD)
Reported on
dry weight
basis
TM83Modified USEPA method 8260. Determination of Alcohols, Acetates, Acetone, Fuel
Oxygenates, THF and Cyclohexane by Headspace GC-MSPM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.
NONE No Method Code NONE No Method Code
Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix
QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 10 of 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Unit 3 Deeside Point
Zone 3
Deeside Industrial Park
Deeside
AECOM
Attention :
Date :
Your reference :
Our reference :
Location :
Date samples received :
Status :
Issue :
One sample were received for analysis on 19th May, 2017 of which one were scheduled for analysis. Please find attached our Test Report which
should be read with notes at the end of the report and should include all sections if reproduced. Interpretations and opinions are outside the scope of
any accreditation, and all results relate only to samples supplied.
All analysis is carried out on as received samples and reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected.
Paul Boden BSc
Project Manager
60544194
60544194
19th May, 2017
Final report
Compiled By:
Test Report 17/8954 Batch 1
Edel O'Hannelly
24th July, 2017
1
Exova Jones Environmental
CH5 2UA
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 833780
Fax: +44 (0) 1244 833781
Acorn Business Campus
Mahon Industrial Park
Black Rock
Cork
Ireland
Registered Address : Exova (UK) Ltd, Lochend Industrial Estate, Newbridge, Midlothian, EH28 8PL
QF-PM 3.1.1 v16Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 1 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Client Name: Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle
JE Job No.: 17/8954 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03
J E Sample No. 5-9,14
Sample ID 501
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V H P G HN
Sample Date 17/05/2017
Sample Type Ground Water
Batch Number 1
Date of Receipt 19/05/2017
Dissolved Arsenic # 14.8 <2.5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Cadmium # <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Calcium # 105.4 <0.2 mg/l TM30/PM14
Total Dissolved Chromium # <1.5 <1.5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Copper # <7 <7 ug/l TM30/PM14
Total Dissolved Iron # 5403 <20 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Lead # <5 <5 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Magnesium # 3.0 <0.1 mg/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Manganese # 1709 <2 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Mercury # <1 <1 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Nickel # <2 <2 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Potassium # 3.5 <0.1 mg/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Sodium # 30.4 <0.1 mg/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Zinc # <3 <3 ug/l TM30/PM14
Alcohols/Acetates
Methyl Alcohol (Methanol) <500 <500 ug/l TM83/PM10
Ethyl Alcohol (Ethanol) <500 <500 ug/l TM83/PM10
i-Propyl Alcohol (Isopropanol) <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Propyl Alcohol <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Butyl Alcohol <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Pentyl Alcohol <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Hexyl Alcohol <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Heptyl Alcohol <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
Methyl Acetate <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
Ethyl Acetate <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
i-Propyl Acetate <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Propyl Acetate <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
n-Butyl Acetate <100 <100 ug/l TM83/PM10
Acetone 123 <50 ug/l TM83/PM10
Cyclohexane 360 <50 ug/l TM83/PM10
Tetrahydrofuran 39 <10 ug/l TM83/PM10
Sulphate as SO4 # 3.0 <0.5 mg/l TM38/PM0
Chloride # 35.0 <0.3 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrate as NO3 # 0.3 <0.2 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrite as NO2 # <0.02 <0.02 mg/l TM38/PM0
Ammoniacal Nitrogen as NH3 # 1.67 <0.03 mg/l TM38/PM0
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 # 321 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 <1 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 321 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
60544194
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60544194
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 2 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Client Name: Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle
JE Job No.: 17/8954 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03
J E Sample No. 5-9,14
Sample ID 501
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V H P G HN
Sample Date 17/05/2017
Sample Type Ground Water
Batch Number 1
Date of Receipt 19/05/2017
Electrical Conductivity @25C # 575 <2 uS/cm TM76/PM0
pH # 6.82 <0.01 pH units TM73/PM0
Total Cations 6.92 <0.00 mmolc/l TM30/PM14
Total Anions 7.47 <0.00 mmolc/l TM0/PM0
% Cation Excess -3.82 % TM0/PM0
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60544194
60544194
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 3 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Client Name: VOC Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact:
JE Job No.: 17/8954
J E Sample No. 5-9,14
Sample ID 501
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V H P G HN
Sample Date 17/05/2017
Sample Type Ground Water
Batch Number 1
Date of Receipt 19/05/2017
VOC MS
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # 8.2 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloromethane # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Vinyl Chloride # <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromomethane <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroethane # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichlorofluoromethane # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1 DCE) # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dichloromethane (DCM) # <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethane # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromochloromethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroform # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloropropene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Carbon tetrachloride # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloroethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # 3.3 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichloroethene (TCE) # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromomethane # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromodichloromethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # 29 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromochloromethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromoethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chlorobenzene # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene #
1075++ <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene #
8454++ <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # 439 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Styrene <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromoform # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Isopropylbenzene # 18 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 <4 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromobenzene # <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichloropropane # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Propylbenzene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene # 13 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
tert-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene # 17 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
sec-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Isopropyltoluene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
n-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Naphthalene <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 103 <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 108 <0 % TM15/PM10
60544194
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60544194
QF-PM 3.1.4 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 4 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Notification of Deviating Samples
J E
Job
No.
Batch Depth J E Sample
No.Analysis Reason
Please note that only samples that are deviating are mentioned in this report. If no samples are listed it is because none were deviating.
Only analyses which are accredited are recorded as deviating if set criteria are not met.
Contact:
Sample ID
Client Name: AECOM
Reference:
Location:
No deviating sample report results for job 17/8954
Exova Jones Environmental
60544194
60544194
Edel O'Hannelly
QF-PM 3.1.11 v3 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 5 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No.:
SOILS
DEVIATING SAMPLES
SURROGATES
DILUTIONS
BLANKS
NOTE
NOTES TO ACCOMPANY ALL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
Please note we are only MCERTS accredited (UK soils only) for sand, loam and clay and any other matrix is outside our scope of accreditation.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
17/8954
WATERS
It is assumed that you have taken representative samples on site and require analysis on a representative subsample. Stones will generally be
included unless we are requested to remove them.
All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected. Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C unless
otherwise stated. Moisture content for CEN Leachate tests are dried at 105°C ±5°C.
Surrogate compounds are added during the preparation process to monitor recovery of analytes. However low recovery in soils is often due to peat,
clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
limits for most organic methods are 70 - 130% and for VOCs are 50 - 150%. When surrogate recoveries are outside the performance criteria but
the associated AQC passes this is assumed to be due to matrix effect. Results are not surrogate corrected.
A dilution suffix indicates a dilution has been performed and the reported result takes this into account. No further calculation is required.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
Please note we are not a UK Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) Approved Laboratory .
If you have not already done so, please send us a purchase order if this is required by your company.
The calculation of Pyrite content assumes that all oxidisable sulphides present in the sample are pyrite. This may not be the case. The calculation
may be an overesitimate when other sulphides such as Barite (Barium Sulphate) are present.
Where analytes have been found in the blank, the sample will be treated in accordance with our laboratory procedure for dealing with contaminated
blanks.
ISO17025 accreditation applies to surface water and groundwater and usually one other matrix which is analysis specific, any other liquids are
outside our scope of accreditation.
As surface waters require different sample preparation to groundwaters the laboratory must be informed of the water type when submitting samples.
Where appropriate please make sure that our detection limits are suitable for your needs, if they are not, please notify us immediately.
Data is only reported if the laboratory is confident that the data is a true reflection of the samples analysed. Data is only reported as accredited when
all the requirements of our Quality System have been met. In certain circumstances where all the requirements of the Quality System have not been
met, for instance if the associated AQC has failed, the reason is fully investigated and documented. The sample data is then evaluated alongside
the other quality control checks performed during analysis to determine its suitability. Following this evaluation, provided the sample results have not
been effected, the data is reported but accreditation is removed. It is a UKAS requirement for data not reported as accredited to be considered
indicative only, but this does not mean the data is not valid.
Where possible, and if requested, samples will be re-extracted and a revised report issued with accredited results. Please do not hesitate to contact
the laboratory if further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation.
Samples must be received in a condition appropriate to the requested analyses. All samples should be submitted to the laboratory in suitable
containers with sufficient ice packs to sustain an appropriate temperature for the requested analysis. If this is not the case you will be informed and
any test results that may be compromised highlighted on your deviating samples report.
Where an MCERTS report has been requested, you will be notified within 48 hours of any samples that have been identified as being outside our
MCERTS scope. As validation has been performed on clay, sand and loam, only samples that are predominantly these matrices, or combinations
of them will be within our MCERTS scope. If samples are not one of a combination of the above matrices they will not be marked as MCERTS
accredited.
Negative Neutralization Potential (NP) values are obtained when the volume of NaOH (0.1N) titrated (pH 8.3) is greater than the volume of HCl (1N)
to reduce the pH of the sample to 2.0 - 2.5. Any negative NP values are corrected to 0.
Where a CEN 10:1 ZERO Headspace VOC test has been carried out, a 10:1 ratio of water to wet (as received) soil has been used.
All samples will be discarded one month after the date of reporting, unless we are instructed to the contrary.
% Asbestos in Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) is determined by reference to HSG 264 The Survey Guide - Appendix 2 : ACMs in buildings
listed in order of ease of fibre release.
QF-PM 3.1.9 v34Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 6 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No.:
#
SA
B
DR
M
NA
NAD
ND
NDP
SS
SV
W
+
++
*
AD
CO
LOD/LOR
ME
NFD
BS
LB
N
TB
OC
17/8954
ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS USED
ISO17025 (UKAS) accredited - UK.
Trip Blank Sample
AQC Sample
Suspected carry over
Limit of Detection (Limit of Reporting) in line with ISO 17025 and MCERTS
Not applicable
No Asbestos Detected.
Dilution required.
ISO17025 (SANAS) accredited - South Africa.
Outside Calibration Range
No Fibres Detected
Result outside calibration range, results should be considered as indicative only and are not accredited.
Results expressed on as received basis.
Surrogate recovery outside performance criteria. This may be due to a matrix effect.
MCERTS accredited.
Matrix Effect
Blank Sample
Client Sample
No Determination Possible
Indicates analyte found in associated method blank.
None Detected (usually refers to VOC and/SVOC TICs).
Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C
Analysis subcontracted to a Jones Environmental approved laboratory.
AQC failure, accreditation has been removed from this result, if appropriate, see 'Note' on previous page.
Calibrated against a single substance
QF-PM 3.1.9 v34Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 7 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No: 17/8954
Test Method No. Description
Prep Method
No. (if
appropriate)
Description
ISO
17025
(UKAS/S
ANAS)
MCERTS
(UK soils
only)
Analysis done
on As Received
(AR) or Dried
(AD)
Reported on
dry weight
basis
TM0 Not available PM0 No preparation is required.
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis. Yes
TM30
Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7, 6010B and BS EN ISO
11885 2009
PM14Analysis of waters and leachates for metals by ICP OES/ICP MS. Samples are filtered for
dissolved metals and acidified if required.
TM30
Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7, 6010B and BS EN ISO
11885 2009
PM14Analysis of waters and leachates for metals by ICP OES/ICP MS. Samples are filtered for
dissolved metals and acidified if required.Yes
TM38Soluble Ion analysis using the Thermo Aquakem Photometric Automatic Analyser.
Modified US EPA methods 325.2, 375.4, 365.2, 353.1, 354.1PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM73Modified US EPA methods 150.1 and 9045D and BS1377:1990. Determination of pH by
Metrohm automated probe analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM75Modified US EPA method 310.1. Determination of Alkalinity by Metrohm automated
titration analyser.PM0 No preparation is required.
TM75Modified US EPA method 310.1. Determination of Alkalinity by Metrohm automated
titration analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM76Modified US EPA method 120.1. Determination of Specific Conductance by Metrohm
automated probe analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix
QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 8 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
JE Job No: 17/8954
Test Method No. Description
Prep Method
No. (if
appropriate)
Description
ISO
17025
(UKAS/S
ANAS)
MCERTS
(UK soils
only)
Analysis done
on As Received
(AR) or Dried
(AD)
Reported on
dry weight
basis
TM83Modified USEPA method 8260. Determination of Alcohols, Acetates, Acetone, Fuel
Oxygenates, THF and Cyclohexane by Headspace GC-MSPM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.
NONE No Method Code NONE No Method Code
Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix
QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 9 of 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31
Pfizer Ringaskiddy Groundwater Monitoring Pfizer Ireland Limited
Prepared for: Pfizer Ireland LimitedCkrp0001 Ringaskiddy Iel Groundwater Monitoring R1 2017 Issue 3 Final.Docx
AECOM
Brendan McCarthyEnvironmental ScientistT: +353 (0)21 4365006M: +353 (0)87 1872998E: [email protected]
AECOM Ireland LimitedDouglas Business CentreCarrigaline RoadCorkIreland
T: +353 21 4536136aecom.com
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 05-05-2018:04:10:31