65
Gehl Making Cities for People People Oriented Mobility and Urban Development Ola Gustafsson Director & Team Lead Stuttgart June 18 2018

People Oriented Mobility and Urban Development...Gehl —Making Cities for People More important than any individual work, Jan Gehl helped to change the planning and design culture

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Gehl — Making Cities for People

People Oriented Mobility and Urban Development

Ola Gustafsson

Director & Team LeadStuttgartJune 18 2018

Gehl — Making Cities for People

New YorkKøbenhavn San Francisco

We are a team of dynamic, talented, international people from varying backgrounds,

who share the values and ambitions of making ‘cities for people’.

Gehl makes cities for people

Gehl — Making Cities for People

1971

Photo by Henningsson

2010 2013

”How does cities affect people?”Jan Gehl

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Regional mobility planning

Region SkåneStations and nodes and generators

for regional and local development

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Integrated Mobility Plans

Mobility PlaybookRed Deer

Gehl — Making Cities for People 6

before

After

Street design – from street to place

New Road, Brighton

175 % more pedestrian traffic22% more bicycles600% more stationary activities

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Pilot Projects

The Porch at 30th Street StationPhiladelphia

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Pilot Projects

16th Street MallDenver

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Eye level

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Design

User Experience

Gehl

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Always part of a long term strategy

City vision

Today

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Source; LSE Cities ‘Going Green Report 2012’. Cities surveyed all over the world on what their top 3 challenges are. http://lsecities.net/files/2012/09/goinggreen.pdf

Top 5 urban challenges

What are the five most significant general challenges facing your city today?

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Is self-driving and electric the solution?

Gehl — Making Cities for People

e-itshub

Ford

If this is the

answer, what

was the question?

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Cities

where

exercise

becomes a

hobby

Gehl — Making Cities for People

2 Future Scenarios

Gehl — Making Cities for People

People-First

Mobility

It’s about everyday life more than technology.

It deals with behavior, invitations and choice – not just flows and

efficiency.

-it’s when mobility

becomes a service to our

cities and not the other

way around!

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Just more vehicle dataInstead of more people

data

Without new tools we’ll

get…

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Make people visible, meet them where they are and give them a voice

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Evaluation Methods

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Copenhagen45 years

Phase 2

2005 - 2010

Phase 1

1965 - 2005

Phase 3

2011 - Present

Public life data primarily collected externally by Jan Gehl and colleagues

Gehl — Making Cities for People

4. Metrics that reflect Values

MORE URBAN LIFE FOR ALL

By 2015, 80% of Copenhageners will be satisfied with the opportunities they have for taking part in urban life.

MORE PEOPLE WALK MORE

To increase the amount of pedestrian traffic by 20% by 2015 compared to today.

MORE PEOPLE STAY LONGER

By 2015, Copenhageners will spend 20% more time in urban space than they do today.

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

More important than any individual work, Jan Gehlhelped to change the planning and design culture of the City.

From politicians to Department heads, project managers and citizens – the notion of people first and Life, Space, Buildings has infiltrated all aspects of making Copenhagen what it is today.

Tina SaabyCity Architect Copenhagen2013

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Architect: COBE

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Copenhagen’s Bicycle AccountEvery second year from 1995

The Copenhagen Bicycle Account

2006

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Trips(to, from and internal)

Share of car trips to work or education

Jobs

Copenhageners

17%

19

%

Copenhagen 1995-2013

25

%

-38%

Gehl — Making Cities for People

City of Copenhagen, The Bicycle Account 2014

Gehl — Making Cities for People

70 % continue to bike through the winter…

Gehl — Making Cities for People

31

Why do Copenhageners cycle?

”Quick, easy, convenient” 56%

”Exercise” 21 %

”Cheap” 12 %

”Environmentally friendly” 1 %

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Where do you start?

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Think holistically!

Public transport

Pedestrian environment

Public spaces

Bicycle environment

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Multifunctional spaces that deliver more than

transport

Sjællandsgade,

København

Local

streetChurch

squareSchoolyard

Gehl — Making Cities for People

From street to Climate adaptation & social

sustainability

Klimakvarteret Østerbro – Illustration Tredje Natur

Storm

water

manageme

nt

movement

Local meeting

places

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Innovation and science Gehl +

Exploratorium

Market street, San

Francisco

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Participation & citizen dialogue

Asunción, Paraguay

Gehl — Making Cities for People

www.nyc.gov/html/dot

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Times Square

89%

11%

Pedestrian area

Car area

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Times Square

90%of the users werepedestrians

10%were motorists

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Times Square | Before Times Square | After

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Broadway, New York |Before

Broadway, New York | After

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Times SquareHarald Square

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Times Square

Gehl — Making Cities for People

GehlGehl

Gehl — Making Cities for People

GehlGehl

NYC Plaza ProgramCommunity groups apply for the

right to receive DOT funding to reclaim plaza space.

60+ plazas reclaimed from roads as public space in six years

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

People are spending more time

outside.

67%said the plazaincreased time spent outside

Gehl — Making Cities for People

0%

100%

50%

25%

75%

Fla

tiro

nP

laza

Div

ers

ity

Pla

za

New

Lo

tsT

ria

ng

le

Pu

tna

mP

laza

Me

atp

ackin

gP

laza

Coro

na

Pla

za

Zio

nT

ria

ng

le

Has this plaza increased the time you spend in public space?

No

Yes

Neighborhoods that most severely lack open space report a greater increase in time spent outside

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Plazas foster social

connections.

53%across all 7

plazasrecognize orknow more

people since the plaza opened

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Those earningless than $50,000 were much more likely to make new connections

$1

5,0

00 to

$4

9,9

99

$0

to

$1

4,9

99

(bla

nk)

$5

0,0

00 to

$9

9,9

99

$1

00

,000

or

mo

re

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

No, I don’t recognize / know more

Yes, I recognize / know more

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Respondents in outer- borough plazas reported a stronger sense of ownership

0%

100%

50%

25%

75%

Fla

tiro

nP

laza

Div

ers

ity

Pla

za

New

Lo

tsT

ria

ng

le

Pu

tna

mP

laza

Me

atp

ackin

gP

laza

Coro

na

Pla

za

Zio

nT

ria

ng

le

Is this plaza Your plaza?

No, not interested

No, just visiting

Not really

YES!

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Piloting Change – testing new solutions

Measure, Test, Refine

Measure use and behavior

Test at scale 1:1 Adapt and Learn

Gehl — Making Cities for People

GehlGehl

The National Street Service

Gehl–Greenfield Labs (Ford+IDEO)

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Gehl — Making Cities for People

Don’t get distracted by the hardware… the real technology is culture

To conclude:

Gehl — Making Cities for People

It’s still all about the human experience

But do we really have the tools to understand it.

To conclude: