Upload
doantu
View
256
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ICLASS-2006 Aug.27-Sept.1, 2006, Kyoto, Japan
1. BACKGROUND
It has been pointed out through a number of experimental studies [1-5] that cavitation takes place in the nozzle of fuel injectors for Diesel engines and affects the characteristics of a discharged liquid jet. Hiroyasu et al. [1] showed that liquid jet atomization was promoted when cavitation extended from the inlet to the exit of a nozzle. Since the shapes of the nozzles used in most of the previous studies have been cylindrical [1-5], it has been difficult to measure liquid velocity, turbulence intensity and radial distribution of cavitation bubbles in nozzles. Hence, several studies have been carried out using two-dimensional (2D) nozzles for visualization of detailed cavitation behavior [6-8]. Recently some attempts have been made to measure the velocity in the nozzle, which might play an important role in liquid jet atomization [9-12]. However the mechanism of atomization enhancement by cavitation has not been clarified yet.
In the present study, cavitation in 2D nozzles and liquid jet were visualized using a digital camera and high-speed video cameras under various conditions of Reynolds and cavitation numbers to examine the effects of the two dimensionless numbers on cavitation and liquid jet and to investigate the atomization enhancement mechanism by cavitation. Liquid velocity in a 2D nozzle was measured by using a Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV) to investigate the effects of cavitating internal flow on liquid jet atomization. 2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP 2.1 Liquid Injection System
Schematic of experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1 [13-18]. Filtered tap water or light oil was discharged from 2D nozzles into ambient air by the plunger pump through the cylindrical air separation tank of 90 mm in inner diameter and 800 mm in height. As shown in Fig. 2, the 2D nozzle consists of two acrylic flat plates and two stainless steel thin flat plates, by which sharp-edges were formed at
the inlet of the nozzle. To examine the effect of nozzle size on the cavitation and liquid jet characteristics, two nozzles of different sizes were used. The width WN, length LN and thickness DN of a nozzle were 4, 16 and 1 mm, and those of the half scale nozzle were 2, 8 and 0.5mm, respectively (LN / WN = 4). This nozzle shape enabled us to measure not only streamwise but also lateral component of the liquid velocity by LDV.
Flash Lamp
2D Nozzle
Digital Camera or High Speed Camera
Power Source
Plunger PumpGas-LiquidSeparation Tank
Fig. 1 Experimental setup
32 mm
WN=4 mm
LN=16 mm
Sharp edgeStainless steelflat plate
DN=1 mm
Acrylicplate
32 mm
WN=4 mm
LN=16 mm
Sharp edgeStainless steelflat plate
DN=1 mm
Acrylicplate
(a) front view (b) side view
Fig. 2 2D Nozzle (WN=4mm, LN=16mm, DN=1mm)
Paper ID ICLASS06-043 EFFECTS OF CAVITATION IN A NOZZLE ON LIQUID JET ATOMIZATION
Akira Sou 1, Maulana Muhammad Ilham 2, Shigeo Hosokawa 3 and Akio Tomiyama 4
1 Assistant Professor, Kobe University, [email protected]
2 Graduate Student, Kobe University, [email protected] 3 Associate Professor, Kobe University, [email protected]
4 Professor, Kobe University, [email protected]
ABSTRACT Cavitation in two-dimensional (2D) nozzles and liquid jet were visualized using high-speed cameras to investigate the effects of cavitation on liquid jet under various conditions of the cavitation and Reynolds numbers σ and Re. Liquid velocity in a 2D nozzle was measured using a Laser Doppler Velocimetry to examine the effects of cavitation on the flow in the nozzle and liquid jet. As a result, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) the cavitation in the 2D nozzles and the liquid jet can be classified into the four regimes: (cavitation regime, liquid jet regime) = (no cavitation, wavy jet), (developing cavitation, wavy jet), (super cavitation, spray) and (hydraulic flip, flipping jet), (2) liquid jet behavior depends on cavitation regime, (3) cavitation and liquid jet near the nozzle exit are not strongly affected by Re but by σ, and (4) ligament formation at liquid jet interface is induced by the collapse of cavitation cloud near the exit. Keywords: Cavitation, Liquid Jet, Visualization, Cavitation Number, Reynolds Number, Nozzle, Ligament, Turbulence, LDV
Table 1 Experimental conditions (TL=292K, WN=4mm)
Mean velocity, VN [m/s]
Reynolds number,
Re
Cavitation number, σ
Cavitation in nozzle
Liquidjet
11.25 45000 1.57 12.5 50000 1.27
No cavitation
14.5 58000 0.94 16.0 64000 0.78
Developing cavitation
Wavy jet
17.0 68000 0.69 17.5 70000 0.65
Super cavitation Spray
19.0 76000 0.55 19.5 78000 0.52
Hydraulic flip
Flippingjet
2.2 Imaging and LDV Systems
Images of cavitation and liquid jet were taken by using a digital camera (Nikon D70, 3008x2000 pixels) and a flush lamp whose duration was 12 µs [14,17]. Time evolution of cavitation in the nozzle and liquid jet were visualized using either an ultra high-speed digital video camera (nac IMACON 200, 1200 x 980 pixels, exposure time tEX = 5 ns, frame rate = 100,000 fps) [13,14,17] or a high-speed digital video camera (Redlake Motion Pro HS-1, 32x1280 pixels, frame rate = 20,000 fps, shutter speed = 50 µs). Streamwise and lateral velocities in the larger nozzle were measured using an LDV system (DANTEC, 60X series) [15-17]. 2.3 Experimental Conditions
Experiments were conducted at various conditions of the cavitation number σ and the Reynolds number Re, which are defined by the following equations.
250 NL
va
V.PP
ρ
−=σ ······················································ (1)
L
NNWVReν
= ························································· (2)
where Pa is the atmospheric pressure, Pv the vapor saturation pressure, ρL the liquid density, VN the mean liquid velocity in the nozzle, νL the liquid kinetic viscosity. These parameters were controlled by the changing liquid flow rate, fluid properties and nozzle size. Typical experimental conditions are listed in Table 1 (water, TL= 292K, WN=4mm). The concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) in water was 9.0 mg/l when the water temperature TL was 291K. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Flow Regimes
Flow regimes in the nozzle and liquid jet near the nozzle exit are summarized in Fig. 3 and Table 1 (water, TL =292K, WN=4mm) [14,17]. When σ>1.2, cavitation bubbles were not observed and liquid jet took the form of "wavy jet". For 0.75<σ<1.2, cavitation bubble clouds appeared in the upper half of the nozzle. We defined this type of the cavitation as "developing cavitation". In developing cavitation, liquid jet near the exit was wavy jet. For 0.55<σ<0.75, cavitation zone extended from the inlet to just above the nozzle exit. We named this regime "super cavitation". In super cavitation, liquid jet atomization was enhanced, i.e., ligaments and droplets appeared ("spray") and the spray angle increased. Further decrease in σ (σ<0.55) resulted in the formation of "hydraulic flip", in which liquid flow separated at one inlet edge and did not reattach to the side wall.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of mean liquid velocity in a nozzle of 4mm in width [15-17]. We confirmed that cavitation appeared within the separated boundary layer (SBL). The distribution of mean velocity was not uniform just below the cavitation zone, i.e. the reattachment point of SBL, however it became almost uniform near the nozzle exit in no cavitation or developing cavitation regimes.
σ=0.78Re=64000
σ=0.65Re=70000
σ=0.55Re=76000
σ=0.94Re=58000
σ=1.27Re=50000
σ=1.57Re=45000
0
5
mm
10
15
0
5
mm
10
15
liquid jet spray flipping jet
developing cavitation super cavitation hydraulic flipno cavitationcavitationin a nozzle
wavy jet
σ=0.78Re=64000
σ=0.65Re=70000
σ=0.55Re=76000
σ=0.94Re=58000
σ=1.27Re=50000
σ=1.57Re=45000
0
5
mm
10
15
0
5
mm
10
15
0
5
mm
10
15
liquid jet spray flipping jet
developing cavitation super cavitation hydraulic flipno cavitationcavitationin a nozzle
wavy jet
Fig. 3 Images of cavitation in 2D nozzle and liquid jet (water, TL=292K, WN=4mm, tEX=12 µs)
(a) σ =1.27, Re=50000 (b) σ =0.95, Re=58000 (c) σ =0.78, Re=64000 (d) σ =0.65, Re=70000
Fig. 4 Mean liquid velocity distributions in a 2D nozzle (WN=4mm, TL=291K)
3.2 Effects of σ and Re on Cavitation and Liquid Jet
The Reynolds number Re increases with TL since νL of water decreases with increasing TL, while σ does not change a lot by varying TL. To examine the influences of σ and Re on cavitation and liquid jet, observations were conducted under various TL conditions [18]. Regimes of cavitation and liquid jet are shown in Figs. 5(a) and (b), respectively. The spray regime region on the liquid jet regime map corresponds to the super cavitation region on the cavitation regime map, which means that the formation of super cavitation enhances liquid jet atomization. Since the transition from developing to super cavitation does not strongly depend on Re but on σ, the transition from wavy jet to spray also depend on σ.
0.5 1.0 1.50.5
1.0
1.5
[×105]
cavitation number σ
Rey
nold
s nu
mbe
r Re
no cav. dev. cav. sup. cav. hydr. flp.
(a) cavitation regime map
0.5 1.0 1.50.5
1.0
1.5
[×105]
cavitation number σ
Rey
nold
s nu
mbe
r Re
wavy jet spray flip. jet
(b) liquid jet regime map
Fig. 5 Effects of σ and Re on cavitation and jet (WN=4mm)
The effects of Re and σ on normalized cavitation length Lcav* (=streamwise length of cavitation zone Lcav / nozzle length LN) are shown in Figs. 6(a) and (b), respectively. The values of Lcav* in the cases of the nozzle of 4mm in width, the half scale nozzle (WN=2mm) and light oil are plotted in the figure. Regime transition in the cases of the half scale nozzle and light oil showed the same trends as that in the 4mm nozzle, and Lcav* did not depend on Re but on σ, though the effects of dissolved gases, turbulence and sharpness of the nozzle inlet edge were not taken into account in the definition of σ.
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0[×105]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Re
L cav
*
TL=293KTL=303KTL=313KTL=333KWN=2mmlight oil
(a) effects of Re on Lcav*
0 1 20.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
σ
L cav
*
TL=293KTL=303KTL=313KTL=333KWN=2mmlight oil
(b) effects of σ on Lcav*
Fig. 6 Effects of Re and σ on cavitation length Lcav*
0
5
mm
10
15
spray angle
0
5
mm
10
15
spray angle Fig. 7 Spray angle θ
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0
5
10
15
Lcav*
Spr
ay a
ngle
(deg
.)
TL=293KTL=303KTL=313KTL=333KWN=2mmlight oil
Fig. 8 Effects of Lcav* on spray angle θ
0 1 2-2
-1
0
1
2
Mea
n la
tera
l vel
ocity
V [m
/s]
Horizontal location x [mm]
σ=0.78 σ=0.65
0 1 20
1
2
3
4
RM
S o
f lat
eral
fliu
ctua
tion
velo
city
v' [
m/s
]
Horizontal location x [mm]
σ=0.78 σ=0.65
(a) mean velocity (b) turbulence velocity Fig. 9 Lateral velocities above the nozzle exit (y=15mm)
Spray angles θ were measured from the recorded images
as shown in Fig. 7, and plotted against Lcav* in Fig. 8. When the value of Lcav* is about 0.8-0.9, i.e. in super cavitation, spray angle increases as shown in Fig. 8.
The mean lateral velocity V and the RMS of lateral fluctuating velocity v' (turbulence velocity) near the exit
(distance from the inlet y=15mm) are shown in Fig. 9 to examine the effects of cavitation on turbulence velocity and liquid jet. In developing cavitation (σ=0.78) the value of V near the exit was close to zero and v' was small. On the other hand, v' in super cavitation (σ=0.65) was large and the value of V at x>1.5mm was positive, i.e., the mean flow directed toward the side wall. The lateral flow and strong turbulence in super cavitation could be the dominant mechanisms to increase the spray angle and initiate atomization.
3.3 Effects of Super Cavitation on Ligament Formation
Cavitation behavior near the nozzle exit in super cavitation regime was visualized using an ultra-high speed camera (tEX=5ns, 100,000fps). Images of the collapse of cavitation cloud are shown in Fig. 10 (WN=4mm, σ=0.69). The collapse of cavitation clouds took place intermittently. The collapse might cause a high turbulence velocity near the exit, and therefore affects the ligament formation.
To examine the relation between the collapse of cavitation cloud and ligament formation in super cavitation regime, cavitation and liquid jet interface were visualized simultaneously with a high frame rate (20,000 fps). Since the refractive index of the acrylic plate of the nozzle is higher than that of air, an acrylic plate was placed between the liquid jet and the camera to match the optical distances. In the high frame rate imaging, the image size was limited to 32 x 1280 pixels. Hence, the acrylic plate was tilted to capture both cavitation and jet interface within a narrow region shown in Fig. 11.
2D Nozzle
Tilted acrylicplate
Visualized region
Liquid jet
Highspeed
camera
2D nozzle
Tilted acrylic plate
2D Nozzle
Tilted acrylicplate
Visualized region
Liquid jet
Highspeed
camera
2D nozzle
Tilted acrylic plate
(a) top view (b) front view
Fig. 11 Visualization of cavitation and liquid jet
2.5 mm
3.1mm
2.5 mm
3.1mm
2.5 mm2.5 mm
3.1mm3.1mm
15
16
mm14
15
16
mm14
15
16
mm14
(a) t=0 µs (b) t=30 µs (c) t=60 µs (d) t=90 µs (e) t=120 µs
Fig. 10 Collapse of cavitation clouds above the nozzle exit (σ=0.69, Re=68000, 2.5 µm/pixel, tEX=5 ns)
0 10 20 30 mm
inletNozzle
exitJet
0ms
0.5ms
1.0ms
1.4ms
VN
VN
Liquid jetNozzleFlow
Side wall
Side wall
0 10 20 30 mm0 10 20 30 mm0 10 20 30 mm
inletNozzle
exitJet
0ms
0.5ms
1.0ms
1.4ms
VN
VN
inletNozzle
exitJet
inletNozzle
exitJet
0ms
0.5ms
1.0ms
1.4ms
VN
VN
Liquid jetNozzleFlow
Side wall
Side wall
Liquid jetNozzleFlow
Side wallSide wall
Side wallSide wall
Fig. 12 Simultaneous visualization of cavitation and liquid jet interface (σ=0.61, 32 x 1280pixels, 20,000 fps)
1 2
2
4
6
0Horizontal location x [mm]R
MS
of s
tream
wis
e flu
ctua
tion
velo
city
u' [
m/s
]
y=0.5mm y=8mm y=13mm
1 2
2
4
6
0Horizontal location x [mm]R
MS
of s
tream
wis
e flu
ctua
tion
velo
city
u' [
m/s
]
y=0.5mm y=4.05mm y=13mm
1 2
2
4
6
0
RM
S of
stre
amw
ise
fluct
uatio
n ve
loci
ty u
' [m
/s]
Horizontal location x [mm]
y=0.5mm y=8.83mm y=13mm y=15mm
1 2
2
4
6
0Horizontal location x [mm]R
MS
of s
tream
wis
e flu
ctua
tion
velo
city
u' [
m/s
]
y=0.5mm y=8mm y=13mm y=15mm
(a) σ=1.27 (b) σ=0.95 (c) σ=0.78 (d) σ=0.65 no cavitation developing cavitation developing cavitation super cavitation
Fig. 13 RMS of streamwise fluctuating velocity
Time series images of cavitation and liquid jet are
shown in Fig. 12 (σ=0.61, 32 x 1280pixels, 20,000 fps). The arrows in the figure represent the paths moving with mean liquid velocity in the nozzle VN. A ligament was formed when a trace of cavitation collapse came out with the velocity VN from the nozzle.
The RMS of streamwise fluctuating velocity is plotted in Fig 13. As shown in the figure, strong turbulence appeared just below the cavitation collapse point (y=4.05mm for σ=0.95, y=8.83mm for σ=0.78, y=15mm for σ=0.65), and the turbulence decreased as y increased. This indicates that turbulence velocity increases just below the collapse point, and the strong turbulence reaches the nozzle exit only in the case of super cavitation. Hence we could confirm that a ligament is formed when liquid with strong turbulence induced by the collapse of cavitation cloud near the exit flows out from a nozzle in super cavitation regime. 4. CONCLUSIONS
Cavitation in two-dimensional (2D) transparent nozzles and liquid jets were visualized using a digital camera, an ultra high-speed video camera and a high-speed video camera. Liquid velocity in the 2D nozzle was measured using a LDV system. The effects of the cavitation number σ and the Reynolds number Re on cavitation in the nozzle and liquid jet were examined by varying the liquid flow rate, fluid properties and nozzle size. Cavitation in the nozzle and ligament formation at liquid jet interface were simultaneously visualized using a high-speed camera to examine the mechanism of atomization enhancement by cavitation. As a result, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) Cavitation in 2D nozzles and liquid jet are classified into
the following regimes: (1: no cavitation, wavy jet), (2: developing cavitation, wavy jet), (3: super cavitation, spray) and (4: hydraulic flip, flipping jet).
(2) Liquid jet atomization depends on cavitation regime, i.e., ligament formation and spray angle depend on cavitation length Lcav*.
(3) Cavitation and a liquid jet near the nozzle exit are not strongly affected by Re but by σ.
(4) Ligament formation is induced by the collapse of cavitation cloud near the nozzle exit.
NOMENCLATURE Lcav* dimensionless cavitation length (=Lcav / LN) LN length of 2D nozzle [m] Re the Reynolds number TL liquid temperature [K] VN mean liquid velocity in a nozzle [m/s] WN width of 2D nozzle [m] Greek Symbols θ spray angle [deg.] σ the cavitation number ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to express their thanks to Mr. Shinji Nigorikawa and Mr. Tatsutoshi Maeda. This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (#
18560170) of the Japan Society for the Promotion Science (JSPS). REFERENCES 1. Hiroyasu, H., Arai, M. and Shimizu, M., "Break-up
Length of a Liquid Jet and Internal Flow in a Nozzle", Proc. ICLASS-91, pp.275-282, 1991.
2 Chaves, H., Knapp, M., Kubitzek, A., Obermeier, F. and Schneider, T., "Experimental Study of Cavitation in the Nozzle Hole of Diesel Injectors Using Transparent Nozzles", SAE Paper, 950290, pp. 645-657, 1991.
3. Soteriou, C., Andrews, R. and Smith, M., "Direct Injection Diesel Sprays and the Effect of Cavitation and Hydraulic Flip on Atomization", SAE Paper, 950080, 1995.
4. Ganippa, L. C., Bark, G., Andersson, S. and Chomiak, J., "Comparison of Cavitation Phenomena in Transparent Scale-up Single-Hole Diesel Nozzles", Proc. CAV2001, A9.005, 2001.
5. Tamaki, N., Shimizu, M. and Hiroyasu, H., "Enhancement of the Atomization of a Liquid Jet by Cavitation in a Nozzle Hole", Atomization and Sprays, 11, pp.125-137, 2001.
6. Henry, M. E. and Collicott, S. H., "Visualization of Internal Flow in a Cavitating Slot Orifice", Atomization and Sprays, 10, pp.545-563, 2000.
7. Iida, H., Matsumura, E., Tanaka, K., Senda, J., Fujimoto, H. and Maly, R. R., "Effect of Internal Flow in a Simulated Diesel Injection Nozzle on Spray Atomization", CD-ROM ICLASS 2000, 2000.
8. Daikoku, M., Furudate, H., Noda, H. and Inamura, T., "Effect of Cavitation in the Two-dimensional Nozzle on Liquid Breakup Process", CD-ROM ICLASS 2003, 17-6, 2003.
9. Walther, J., Schaller, J. K., Wirth, R. and Tropea, C., "Investigation of Internal Flow in Transparent Diesel Injection Nozzles using Fluorescent Particle Image Velocimetry (FPIV)", CD-ROM ICLASS 2000, 2000.
10. Gnirss, M., Heukelbach, K. and Tropea, C., "Influence of Nozzle Flow on the Atomization of Liquid Sheets and Round Jets", Proc. DFG-Priority Program Atomization and Spray Processes, 1.2, 2004.
11. He, L. and Ruiz, F., "Effect of Cavitation on Flow and Turbulence in Plain Orifices for Highspeed Atomization", Atomization and Sprays, 5-6, pp.569-584, 1995.
12. Oda, T. and Yasuda, Y., "Experimental Investigation on Structure of Cavitating Flow and Velocity Field inside a 2-D Hole Nozzle", CD-ROM ICLASS 2003, 12-5, 2003.
13. Sou, A., Tomiyama, A., Hosokawa, S., Nigorikawa, S. and Matsumoto, Y., "Visualization of Cavitation in a Two-Dimensional Nozzle and Liquid Jet", CD-ROM 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, 479, 2004.
14. Sou, A., Tomiyama, A., Hosokawa, S., Nigorikawa, S. and Matsumoto, Y., "Cavitation in a Two-Dimensional Nozzle and Liquid Jet Atomization (1st Report: Ultra-High Speed Visualization)", Trans. JSME, 72 (714) B, pp. 513-520, in Japanese, 2006.
15. Sou, A., Tomiyama, A., Hosokawa, S., Nigorikawa, S. and Matsumoto, Y., "Cavitation and Internal Flow in a Two-Dimensional Injector Nozzle", CD-ROM 6th US-Japan Seminar on Two-Phase Flow Dynamics, pp.217-226, 2004.
16. Sou, A., Tomiyama, A., Hosokawa, S., Nigorikawa, S. and
Maeda, T., "Cavitation in a Two-Dimensional Nozzle and Liquid Jet Atomization (2nd Report: LDV Measurement of Liquid Velocity in a Nozzle)", Trans. JSME, 72 (714) B, pp. 521-527, in Japanese, 2006.
17. Sou, A., Tomiyama, A., Hosokawa, S., Nigorikawa, S. and Matsumoto, Y., "LDV Measurement of Cavitating Flows in a Two-Dimensional Nozzle", CD-ROM Int. Symp. on Heat and Mass Transfer in Spray Systems, 2005.
18. Sou, A., Muhammad Ilham Maulana, Hosokawa, S. and Tomiyama, A., "Effects of the Cavitation and Reynolds Numbers on Cavitating Flow in a Two-Dimensional Nozzle", Progress in Multiphase Flow Research, Vol. 1, pp. 65-70, in Japanese, 2006.