20
Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow Maintaining quality the wiki way

Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

  • Upload
    vadin

  • View
    21

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow. Maintaining quality the wiki way. Peer review. Helps to ensure quality, credibility, accuracy, clinical value of content Establishes a reliable body of research and knowledge, sets standards for a discipline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

OrthopaediaPeer Review Workflow

Maintaining quality the wiki way

Page 2: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Peer review

• Helps to ensure quality, credibility, accuracy, clinical value of content

• Establishes a reliable body of research and knowledge, sets standards for a discipline

• Gives authors the opportunity to correct weaknesses identified by peer reviewers

• Prevents dissemination of unsubstantiated claims, faulty interpretations, irrelevant findings, personal biases

Page 3: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Content development and quality

• Editorial Boards from subspeciality associations oversee the content development and maintenance of quality using the Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow Engine

Page 4: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Case example: AOFAS & Foot and Ankle Section

Page 5: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Labels used for tracking, activation of peer review workflow

• “aofas” label – article is part of the AOFAS content partnership collection

• “aofas_review” – article added to the AOFAS Peer Review Workflow

• “aofas_dev” – article under development by AOFAS member

aofas_review label can only be removed by an Orthopaedia Administratoraofas_review label can only be removed by an Orthopaedia Administrator

Page 6: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

User groups created for “editors”and “reviewers”

Page 7: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

AOFAS peer review workflow

aofas-reviewers

aofas-editors

authors

Page 8: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Peer review workflow engine

• Workflow can be customized and configured to meet specific needs of subspecialty society

Page 9: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Draft

• A newly contributed article is labeled as a “Draft,” triggering peer review

Page 10: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Under review

• An article that moves to “Under Review” is “locked” – it can only be edited by the AOFAS Reviewers

Page 11: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Reviewed

• An article that has been reviewed goes back to the author for revisions recommended by the reviewers or is submitted to Editor-in-Chief

Page 12: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Published

• Once the Editor-in-Chief is satisfied, the article is published

Page 13: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Peer review workflow

Workflow process shows states of peer review process and dates. All edits and versions are tracked as an activity log.

Page 14: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Workflow report

Workflow reports track the states of articles.

Page 15: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Workflow emails

Page 16: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Notifications

By clicking on “Watch Page Family,” the AOFAS Editorial Board is notified of any changes made to the articles.

Page 17: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Call for articles

• Articles written according to a template to ensure uniformity

• Potential authors asked to contact Editor-in-Chief• Allows control over how articles are developed

Page 18: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Article under development

• Once an author has been approved to write on a topic, the page is reserved for that author and the article is labeled “Under Development”

Page 19: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Disclaimer

• Disclaimer for the section clearly indicates that changes are subject to modification or deletion

Page 20: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Disclaimer

• Disclaimer appears on articles developed under content partnership