Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    1/30

    8th edition

    Steven P. Robbins

    Mary Coulter 

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    2/30

    3–2

    The Manager: Omnipotent or Symbolic?

    • Omnipotent (all-powerful) View of ManagementManagers are directly responsible for an

    organization’s success or failure.

    Te !uality of te organization is determined by te!uality of its managers.

    Managers are eld most accountable (considered

    responsible) for an organization’s

    performance yet it is difficult toattribute (to connect) good or poor

    performance directly to teir influence

    on te organization.

    Page 49

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    3/30

    3–3

    The Manager: Omnipotent or Symbolic?

    • "ymbolic (representati#e) View of ManagementMuc of an organization’s success or failure is due to

    e$ternal forces outside of managers’ control.

    Te ability of managers to affect outcomes is

    influenced and constrained (limited) by e$ternal factors.

    Te economy% customers% go#ernmental policies%

    competitors% industry conditions%

    tecnology% and te actions of

    pre#ious managers

    Managers symbolize (represent) control

    and influence troug teir action.

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    4/30

    3–4

    The Manager: Omnipotent or Symbolic?

    • Action o! manager according to the omnipotent

    and ymbolic "ie#:Omnipotent #iew& 'ctions include anticipating cange

    e$ploiting opportunities correcting poor performanceleading organizations toward teir goals.

    "ymbolic #iew& 'ctions include de#eloping plans maingdecisions engaging in acti#ities for te benefit ofstocolders% customers% employees and te public.

    Managerial dicretion (freedom to act independently):

    Managers are neiter powerless nor all-powerful. 'ltougtey operate witin constraints imposed by teorganization’s culture (internal constraints) and teen#ironment (e$ternal constraints)% tey can still influence teorganization’s performance.

    Page $%

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    5/30

    3–$

    &'hibit 3()&'hibit 3()

    Parameter o! Managerial *icretion

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    6/30

    3–+

    The Organi,ation- ./lt/re (caracter)

    • Organizational *ulture

     ' system of sared meanings and common beliefs eld byorganizational members tat determines% in a large degree% owtey act towards eac oter.

    +Te way we do tings around ere.,

    Values% symbols% rituals (usual bea#ior)% myts (beliefs)% and

    practices. mplications (meanings)&

    *ulture is a perception (based on watis seen% eard or e$perienced)

    *ulture is sared (described by all

    in similar terms) *ulture is descripti#e (it describes

    rater tan e#aluates)

    Page $)

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    7/30

    3–0

    *imenion o! Organi,ational ./lt/re

    • "e#en dimensions (principles% components) capture te

    essential meanings of an organization’s culture.  Oneor more of tese dimensions may be empasized in #ariousdegrees of importance% wic gi#es te organization itsdistincti#e personality (caracter).

     'ttention to etail

    Outcome Orientation/eople Orientation

    Team Orientation 'ggressi#eness (being fearless and enterprising)

    "tability (being free from cange) "tatus !uo 0 maintaining te

    e$isting situation

    nno#ation and 1is Taing

    Page $)

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    8/30

    3–8

    &'hibit 3(2&'hibit 3(2

    *imenion o! Organi,ational ./lt/re

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    9/30

    3–9

    Strong "er/ 1ea ./lt/re

    • "trong *ultures

     're cultures in wic ey #alues are deeply eld (strongly committed to) and widely sared (accepted and applied by e#eryone).

    Tey 2a#e a greater influence on employees tan do wea cultures

    3mployees are more committed tan tose in organizations wit

    wea cultures

    "trong cultures promote ig performance.

    • 4actors nfluencing te "trengt of *ulture

    "ize of te organization

     'ge of te organization

    1ate of employee turno#er  (tat a#e to be replaced)

    "trengt of te original culture

    *larity (easy to understand) of cultural #alues and beliefs

    Page $2

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    10/30

    3–)%

    Organi,ational ./lt/re• "ources of Organizational *ultureTe organization’s founders (tose wo started te business)

    Teir #ision or mission and te image tey pro5ect of wat

    te organization sould be.

    /ast practices of te organization

    Te way tings a#e been done beforeTe bea#ior of top management

    3.g. Teir focus on aggressi#eness or treating employees as

    family.

    • 2ow te Organizational *ulture *ontinues1ecruitment of lie-minded employees wo +fit,

    "ocialization of new employees to elp tem adapt to te

    culture.Page $3

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    11/30

    3–))

    &'hibit 3(4&'hibit 3(4

    o# an Organi,ation- ./lt/re &tablihed

    and Maintained

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    12/30

    3–)2

    o# &mployee 5earn ./lt/re

    • "tories

    Telling stories of significant e#ents or actions and people tat sow tespirit of te organization% presented in print or #ideos.

    • 1ituals

    1epetiti#e se!uences of acti#ities tat e$press and reinforce te #alues

    of te organization. 3.g. Morning pysical e$ercises or singing as it is

    done in 6apan.

    • Material "ymbols

    /ysical assets distinguising te organization. 3.g. Type of

    automobiles% of furniture% te size of offices% dress code.

    • 7anguage

     'cronyms (word forms)% caracteristic language% use of terms% prases%

    and word meanings specific to an organization.

    Page $$

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    13/30

    3–)3

    o# ./lt/re A!!ect Manager

    • *ultural *onstraints tat affect Managers

    Managerial actions tat te organizational culturerecognizes as proper or improper (rigt or wrong)

    Organizational acti#ities tat te culture #alues and

    encourages

    Te strengt or weaness of te organizational

    culture

    "imple rule for getting aead in an organization&

    Find out what the organization rewards and do those things.

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    14/30

    3–)4

    &'hibit 3($a&'hibit 3($a

    Managerial *eciion A!!ected by ./lt/re

    • Planning

    • Te degree of ris tat plans sould contain

    • 8eter plans sould be de#eloped by indi#iduals or teams

    • Te degree of en#ironmental scanning in wic management

    will engage• Organi,ing

    • 2ow muc autonomy (independence) sould be designed into

    employees’ 5obs

    • 8eter tass sould be done by indi#iduals or in teams

    • Te e$tent of interaction (acting togeter) between department

    managers

    Page $8

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    15/30

    3–)$

    &'hibit 3($b&'hibit 3($b

    Managerial *eciion A!!ected by ./lt/re

    • 5eading 

    • Te degree to wic managers are concerned wit increasing

    employee 5ob satisfaction

    • 8at styles of leadersip are appropriate

    • 8eter all disagreements9e#en constructi#e ones9souldbe eliminated

    • .ontrolling 

    • 8eter to impose e$ternal controls or to allow employees to

    control teir own actions

    • 8at criteria (basis for comparison) sould be used wen

    e#aluating employee performance

    • 8at conse!uences will occur from e$ceeding one’s budget

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    16/30

    3–)+

    &'hibit 3(+&'hibit 3(+

    S/ggetion !or Manager: .reating a More

    &thical ./lt/re

    • 6e a visible role model (

    • .omm/nicate ethical expectations (tell wat is rigt and

    wrong)(

    • Pro"ide ethics training (

    • 7iibly reward ethical (onorable) acts and punish

    unethical ones(

    • Pro"ide protective mechanisms o employee can

    dic/ ethical dilemma (problems) and report

    /nethical beha"ior #itho/t !ear(

    Page $9

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    17/30

    3–)0

    Organi,ation ./lt/re /e

    • *reating an 3tical*ulture

    2ig in ris tolerance

    7ow to moderate

    aggressi#eness

    4ocus on means as

    well as outcomes

    • *reating an nno#ati#e*ulture

    *allenge and

    in#ol#ement

    4reedom

    Trust and openness

    dea time

    /layfulness:umor *onflict resolution

    ebates

    1is-taing

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    18/30

    3–)8

    Organi,ation ./lt/re /e cont-d

    • *reating a *ustomer-1esponsi#e *ulture

    2iring te rigt type of employees (ones wit a stronginterest in ser#ing customers)

    2a#ing few rigid rules% procedures% and regulations

    ;sing widespread (general) empowerment of employees

    2a#ing good listening sills in relating to customers’messages

    /ro#iding role clarity to employees to reduce ambiguity

    (lac of clarity) and conflict and increase 5ob satisfaction (clearly

    define responsibilities so as to eliminate confusion)2a#ing conscientious% caring employees willing to tae

    initiati#e

    Page +%

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    19/30

    3–)9

    Spirit/ality and Organi,ational ./lt/re

    •8orplace "pirituality

    Te recognition tat people a#e an inner life (deep feelings andemotional states) tat nourises (pro#ides) and is nourised by

    meaningful wor tat taes place in te conte$t of community.

    3mployees are looing for ways to cope wit stress and

    pressures in teir li#es.

    •*aracteristics of a "piritual Organization

    "trong sense of purpose (important role)

    4ocus on indi#idual de#elopment

    Trust and openness

    3mployee empowerment (autorizing decision maing)

    Toleration (acceptance) of employees’ e$pression (allowing peopleto e$press feelings and be temsel#es)

    Page +)

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    20/30

    3–2%

    6ene!it o! Spirit/ality

    • mpro#ed employee producti#ity• 1eduction of employee turno#er 

    • "tronger organizational performance

    • ncreased creati#ity• ncreased employee satisfaction

    • ncreased team performance

    • ncreased organizational performance

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    21/30

    3–2)

    *e!ining the &'ternal &n"ironment

    • 3$ternal 3n#ironment

    Te forces and institutions outside te organizationtat potentially can affect te organization’s

    performance.

    • *omponents of te 3$ternal 3n#ironment

    Speci!ic en"ironment: e$ternal forces tat a#e a

    direct and immediate impact on te organization (e.g.customers% suppliers% competitors).

    eneral en"ironment: broad economic% socio-

    cultural (e.g. religion% lifestyles% tecnology)% political:legal%

    demograpic (e.g. gender% age% education% income)% 

    tecnological% and global conditions tat may  affect

    te organization.Page +3

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    22/30

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    23/30

    3–23

    o# the &n"ironment A!!ect Manager

    • 3n#ironmental ;ncertainty

    Te e$tent to wic managers a#e nowledge of and

    are able to predict cange in teir organization’s e$ternal

    en#ironment is affected by&

    imensions in 3n#ironmental ;ncertainty.omple'ity o! the en"ironment: te number of

    components in an organization’s e$ternal

    en#ironment.

    *egree o! change in en"ironmental component: 

    ow dynamic or stable te e$ternal en#ironment is.

    Page +8

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    24/30

    3–24

    &'hibit 3()%&'hibit 3()%

    &n"ironmental ;ncertainty Matri'

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    25/30

    3–2$

    Staeholder

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    26/30

    3–2+

    &'hibit 3())&'hibit 3())

    Organi,ational Staeholder

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    27/30

    3–20

    Managing Staeholder

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    28/30

    3–28

    . A P T & < < & 7 & 1 )=3

    The Manager: Omnipotent or Symbolic (slide @)• .ontrat the action o! manager according to the

    omnipotent and ymbolic "ie#(

    • &'plain the parameter o! managerial dicretion(

    The Organi,ation- ./lt/re (slides A% B% =C% =>)

    • *ecribe the e"en dimenion o! organi,ational c/lt/re(

    • *ic/ the impact o! a trong c/lt/re on organi,ation

    and manager(

    • &'plain the o/rce o! an organi,ation- c/lt/re and ho#

    that c/lt/re contin/e(

    • *ecribe ho# c/lt/re i tranmitted to employee(

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    29/30

    3–29

    . A P T & < < & 7 & 1 2=3

    ./rrent Organi,ational /e >acing Manager (slides =D% =A%=B)

    • *ecribe the characteritic o! an ethical c/lt/re an inno"ati"e

    c/lt/re and a c/tomer@reponi"e c/lt/re(

    • *ic/ #hy #orplace pirit/ality eem to be an important

    concern(

    • *ecribe the characteritic o! a pirit/al organi,ation(

  • 8/17/2019 Orgculture Robbins&Coulter

    30/30

    3–3%

    . A P T & < < & 7 & 1 3=3

    •The &n"ironment (slides >=% >?% >E% >D)

    • *ecribe the component o! the peci!ic and general

    en"ironment(

    • *ic/ the t#o dimenion o! en"ironmental /ncertainty(

    • denti!y the mot common organi,ational taeholder(

    • &'plain the !o/r tep in managing e'ternal taeholder

    relationhip(