50
CSE & Enterprise Systems Center Lehigh University 1 Roger N. Nagel © 2006 Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership & Power Roger N. Nagel Senior Fellow & Wagner Professor Lehigh University

Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

  • Upload
    lethu

  • View
    243

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

1

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Organizational Behavior andOrganizational Change

Leadership & Power

Roger N. NagelSenior Fellow & Wagner Professor

Lehigh University

Page 2: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

2

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Topics This PresentationWhat Is Leadership?

Leadership TraitsGrid Management StylesPath-Goal Theory of Leadership

Trust: The Foundation of LeadershipDimensions of TrustThree Types of TrustBasic Principles of Trust

Charismatic approaches to leadershipKey Characteristics of Charismatic LeadersBeyond Charismatic Leadership

Contemporary Leadership RolesMentoringEthical LeadershipFacilitating Leader

“Organizational behavior”Eleventh Edition

By Steve RobbinsISBN 0-13-191435-9

Reference Book

“Organizational behavior”Eleventh Edition

By Steve RobbinsISBN 0-13-191435-9

Reference Book

2

o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o ro r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r

stephen p. robbins

e l e v e n t h e d i t i o ne l e v e n t h e d i t i o n

Page 3: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

3

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Topics This Presentation

Personal PowerA Definition of PowerContrasting Leadership and Power

Bases of Power: Formal PowerInformation PowerPersonal PowerDependency Power

Power TacticsPower in GroupsPower & PoliticsDefensive Behaviors

Blame Culture in an Organization

“Organizational behavior”Eleventh Edition

By Steve RobbinsISBN 0-13-191435-9

Reference Book

“Organizational behavior”Eleventh Edition

By Steve RobbinsISBN 0-13-191435-9

Reference Book

2

o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o ro r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r

stephen p. robbins

e l e v e n t h e d i t i o ne l e v e n t h e d i t i o n

Page 4: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

4

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

What Is Leadership?Leadership

The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals.

Management

Use of authority inherent in designated formal rank to obtain compliance from organizational members.

Page 332Page 332

Page 5: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

5

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Leadership Traits: USA View

Leadership Traits:• Ambition and energy• The desire to lead• Honest and integrity• Self-confidence• Intelligence• High self-monitoring• Job-relevant knowledge

Leadership TraitsLeadership Traits::•• Ambition and energyAmbition and energy•• The desire to leadThe desire to lead•• Honest and integrityHonest and integrity•• SelfSelf--confidenceconfidence•• IntelligenceIntelligence•• High selfHigh self--monitoringmonitoring•• JobJob--relevant knowledgerelevant knowledge

Page 6: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

6

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Behavioral Theories

• Trait theory:Leaders are born, not made.

• Behavioral theory:Leadership traits can be taught.

•• Trait theory:Trait theory:Leaders are born, not made.Leaders are born, not made.

•• Behavioral theory:Behavioral theory:Leadership traits can be taught.Leadership traits can be taught.

Behavioral Theories of Leadership

Theories proposing that specific behaviors differentiate leaders from non-leaders.

Your View

My View

Agree

Disagree

Page 7: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

7

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Grid Management StylesEmployee-Oriented Leader

Emphasizing interpersonal relations; taking a personal interest in the needs of employees and accepting individual differences among members.

Production-Oriented Leader

One who emphasizes technical or task aspects of the job.

Page 8: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

8

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

The Managerial

Grid(Blake and Mouton)

E X H I B I T 11–1 Page 337

E X H I B I T 11–1 Page 337

Page 9: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

9

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Scandinavian StudiesDevelopment-Oriented LeaderOne who values experimentation, seeking new ideas, and generating and implementing change.

Researchers in Finland and Sweden question whether there are only two dimensions (production-orientation and employee-orientation) that capture the essence of leadership behavior. Their premise is that in a changing world, effective leaders would exhibit development-oriented behavior.

Page 10: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

10

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Path-Goal Theory of LeadersshipPath-Goal Theory

The theory that it is the leader’s job to assist followers in attaining their goals and to provide them the necessary direction and/or support to ensure that their goals are compatible with the overall objectives of the group or organization.

Page 344Page 344

Page 11: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

11

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Trust: The Foundation of LeadershipTrust

A positive expectation that another will not—through words, actions, or decisions—act opportunistically.

Trust is a history-dependent process (familiarity) based on relevant but limited samples of experience (risk).

E X H I B I T 12–1 Page 356

E X H I B I T 12–1 Page 356

Page 12: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

12

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Dimensions of TrustIntegrity

honesty and truthfulness.Competence

technical and interpersonal knowledge and skills.

Consistencyreliability, predictability, and good judgment in handling situations.

Loyaltythe willingness to protect and save face for another person.

Opennessreliance on the person to give you the full truth.

Page 13: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

13

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Trust and Leadership

LeadershipLeadershipLeadership

TRUSTand

INTEGRITY

TRUSTTRUSTandand

INTEGRITYINTEGRITY

Page 14: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

14

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Employees’ Trust in Their CEOsEmployees who believe in senior management:

Source: Gantz Wiley Research. Reproduced in USA Today, February 12, 2003, p. 7B.

E X H I B I T 12–2 Page 358

E X H I B I T 12–2 Page 358

Page 15: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

15

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Three Types of Trust

Deterrence-based Trust

Trust based on fear of reprisal if the trust is violated.

Identification-based Trust

Trust based on a mutual understanding of each other’s intentions and appreciation of the other’s wants and desires.

Knowledge-based Trust

Trust based on behavioral predictability that comes from a history of interaction.

Page 16: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

16

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Basic Principles of Trust

Mistrust drives out trust.

Trust begets trust.

Growth often masks mistrust.

Trust increases cohesion.

Mistrusting groups self-destruct.

Mistrust generally reduces productivity.

Page 17: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

What are the important leadership traits from your point of view? Please add any traits you feel are missing!

Willing to SacrificeVisionary

CharismaticTrust Building

Path-GoalDevelopment-OrientedJob-relevant knowledge

High self-monitoringIntelligence

Self-confidenceHonest and integrity

The desire to leadAmbition and energy

Chinese ViewChinese ViewLeadership TraitsLeadership TraitsUSA ViewUSA View

Page 18: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

18

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Charismatic Approaches to Leadership

Charismatics Influence Followers By:1. Articulating the vision2. Setting high performance expectations3. Conveying a new set of values4. Making personal sacrifices

Charismatics Influence Followers By:1. Articulating the vision2. Setting high performance expectations3. Conveying a new set of values4. Making personal sacrifices

Charismatic Leadership Theory

Followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors.

Page 19: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

19

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Key Characteristics of Charismatic Leaders

E X H I B I T 12–3 Page 363

E X H I B I T 12–3 Page 363

1. Vision and articulation. Has a vision—expressed as an idealized goal—that proposes a future better than the status quo; and is able to clarify the importance of the vision in terms that are understandable to others.

2. Personal risk. Willing to take on high personal risk, incur high costs and engage in self-sacrifice to achieve the vision.

3. Environmental sensitivity. Able to make realistic assessments of the environmental constraints and resources needed to bring about change.

4. Sensitivity to follower needs. Perceptive of others’ abilities and responsive to their needs and feelings.

5. Unconventional behavior. Engages in behaviors that are perceived as novel and counter to norms.

Source: Based on J. A. Conger and R. N. Kanungo, Charismatic Leadership in Organizations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998), p. 94.

Page 20: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

20

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Beyond Charismatic Leadership Level 5 Leaders

Possess a fifth dimension—a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will—in addition to the four basic leadership qualities of individual capability, team skills, managerial competence, and the ability to stimulate others to high performance.Channel their ego needs away from themselves and into the goal of building a great company.

Page 21: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

21

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Transactional and Transformational Leadership

• Contingent Reward

• Management by Exception (active)

• Management by Exception (passive)

• Laissez-Faire

• Charisma

• Inspiration

• Intellectual Stimulation

• Individual Consideration

Transactional Leaders

Leaders who guide or motivate their followers in the direction of established goals by clarifying role and task requirements.

Transformational Leaders

Leaders who provide individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation, and who possess charisma.

Page 22: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

22

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Characteristics of Transactional Leaders

E X H I B I T 12–4 Page 367

E X H I B I T 12–4 Page 367

Contingent Reward: Contracts exchange of rewards for effort, promises rewards for good performance, recognizes accomplishments.

Management by Exception (active): Watches and searches for deviations from rules and standards, takes corrective action.

Management by Exception (passive): Intervenes only if standards are not met.

Laissez-Faire: Abdicates responsibilities, avoids making decisions.

Source: B. M. Bass, “From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1990, p. 22.

Page 23: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

23

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Characteristics of Transformational Leaders

Charisma: Provides vision and sense of mission, instills pride, gains respect and trust.

Inspiration: Communicates high expectations, uses symbols to focus efforts, expresses important purposes in simple ways.

Intellectual Stimulation: Promotes intelligence, rationality, and careful problem solving.

Individualized Consideration: Gives personal attention, treats each employee individually, coaches, advises.

E X H I B I T 12–4 Page 367

E X H I B I T 12–4 Page 367

Page 24: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

24

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Effectiveness

Elements of Emotional Intelligence:

• Self-awareness

• Self-management

• Self-motivation

• Empathy

• Social skills

Elements of Emotional Intelligence:

• Self-awareness

• Self-management

• Self-motivation

• Empathy

• Social skillsPage 368Page 368

Page 25: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

25

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Contemporary Leadership Roles: Providing Team Leadership

Team Leadership Roles:

• Act as liaisons with external constituencies.

• Serve as troubleshooters.

• Managing conflict.

• Coaching to improve team member performance

Team Leadership Roles:

• Act as liaisons with external constituencies.

• Serve as troubleshooters.

• Managing conflict.

• Coaching to improve team member performance

Page 369Page 369

Lee Iacocca

Page 26: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

26

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Contemporary Leadership Roles: Mentoring

Mentoring Activities:

• Present ideas clearly• Listen well• Empathize• Share experiences• Act as role model• Share contacts• Provide political guidance

Mentoring Activities:

• Present ideas clearly• Listen well• Empathize• Share experiences• Act as role model• Share contacts• Provide political guidance

Mentor

A senior employee who sponsors and supports a less-experienced employee (a protégé).

Page 371Page 371

Page 27: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

27

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Contemporary Leadership Roles: Facilitating Leader

Facilitating Leader:

• Set clear goals and objectives• Provide resources• Ensure the subordinates

receive credit• Mentor, Advise, and Guide• Applaud the success of their

subordinates

Facilitating Leader:

• Set clear goals and objectives• Provide resources• Ensure the subordinates

receive credit• Mentor, Advise, and Guide• Applaud the success of their

subordinates

Facilitating Leader

The most successful leaders strive to make The their subordinates successful in leadership roles

Peter Likins Presents awards

Page 28: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

28

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Actions:• Work to positively change the

attitudes and behaviors of employees.

• Engage in socially constructive behaviors.

• Do not abuse power or use improper means to attain goals.

Actions:• Work to positively change the

attitudes and behaviors of employees.

• Engage in socially constructive behaviors.

• Do not abuse power or use improper means to attain goals.

Ethical Leadership

Page 373Page 373

Page 29: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

29

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Personal Exercise1. Rate yourself on the grid and

explain your rating.2. Fill out the two columns on

the left and add any rows you need.

Areas you wish to improve

Check Your Characteristics

Leadership Traits

Willing to SacrificeVisionary

CharismaticTrust Building

Path-GoalDevelopment-OrientedJob-relevant knowledge

High self-monitoringIntelligence

Self-confidenceHonest and integrityThe desire to lead

Ambition and energy

Page 30: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

30

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Personal Exercise continued

3. For any areas for improvement you identified explain what you want to achieve, and how you might accomplish the improvement.

4. What else did you learn about leadership that you value? How will you act on what you have learned?

Page 31: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

31

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Page 32: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

32

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Topics This Presentation

Personal PowerA Definition of PowerContrasting Leadership and Power

Bases of Power: Formal PowerInformation PowerPersonal PowerDependency Power

Power TacticsPower in GroupsPower & PoliticsDefensive Behaviors

Blame Culture in an Organization

“Organizational behavior”Eleventh Edition

By Steve RobbinsISBN 0-13-191435-9

Reference Book

“Organizational behavior”Eleventh Edition

By Steve RobbinsISBN 0-13-191435-9

Reference Book

2

o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o ro r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r

stephen p. robbins

e l e v e n t h e d i t i o ne l e v e n t h e d i t i o n

Page 33: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

Personal Power

I Am Proud to Be a Member of the Chinese Nation and to Consider Myself a Citizen of the World. As a Son of the Chinese People, I Dearly Love My Country and My Compatriots.

---Deng Xiaoping http://www.cbw.com/asm/xpdeng/quicksurvey.html

"Man of the Year" for 1985.

Page 34: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

34

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

A Definition of Power

A B

Power

The capacity that A has to influence the behavior of B so that B acts in accordance with A’s wishes.

Dependency

B’s relationship to A when A possesses something that B requires.

Page 390Page 390

Page 35: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

35

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Contrasting Leadership and Power

Power tactics for gaining compliance

Leadership styles and relationships with

followers

Research FocusResearch Focus

Used to gain lateral and upward influence.

Focuses influence downward.

Requires follower dependency.Requires goal compatibility with followers.

Used as a means for achieving goals.

Focuses on goal achievement.

PowerLeadership

Page 36: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

36

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Bases of Power: Formal Power

Coercive PowerA power base dependent on fear.

Reward PowerCompliance achieved based on the ability to distribute rewards that others view as valuable

Formal Power

Is established by an individual’s position in an organization; conveys the ability to coerce or reward, from formal authority, or from control of information.

Page 390Page 390

Page 37: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

37

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Bases of Power: Formal PowerLegitimate Power

The power a person receives as a result of his or her position in the formal hierarchy of an organization.

Information Power

Power that comes from access to and control over information.

Page 38: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

38

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Bases of Power: Personal PowerExpert Power

Influence based on special skills or knowledge.

Referent Power

Influence based on possession by an individual of desirable resources or personal traits.

Charismatic Power

An extension of referent power stemming from an individual’s personality and interpersonal style.

Page 39: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

39

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Source: Drawing by Leo Cullum in The New Yorker, copyright ©1986 The New Yorker Magazine. E X H I B I T 13–1

Page 393

E X H I B I T 13–1 Page 393

“ I was just going to say ‘Well, I don’t make the rules,’But, of course, I do make the rules.”

Page 40: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

40

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Dependency: The Key To PowerThe General Dependency Postulate

The greater B’s dependency on A, the greater the power A has over B.Possession/control of scarce organizational resources that others need makes a manager powerful.Access to optional resources (e.g., multiple suppliers) reduces the resource holder’s power.

What Creates DependencyImportance of the resource to the organizationScarcity of the resourceNon-substitutability of the resource

Page 394Page 394

Page 41: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

41

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Power Tactics

Influence Tactics:

• Legitimacy

• Rational persuasion

• Inspirational appeals

• Consultation

• Exchange

• Personal appeals

• Ingratiation

• Pressure

• Coalitions

Influence Tactics:

• Legitimacy

• Rational persuasion

• Inspirational appeals

• Consultation

• Exchange

• Personal appeals

• Ingratiation

• Pressure

• Coalitions

Power Tactics

Ways in which individuals translate power bases into specific actions.

Page 396Page 396

Page 42: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

42

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Power Tactics1. Legitimacy.

Relying on one’s authority position; » request is in accord with organizational policies or rules..

2. Rational persuasion. Logical arguments and factual evidence;

» request is reasonable.3. Inspirational appeals.

Enveloping emotional commitment; » appeal to values, needs, hopes, and aspirations.

4. Consultation. Increase motivation and support;

» involve people in deciding how the pan will be implemented.

Page 396Page 396

Page 43: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

43

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Power Tactics5. Exchange.

Reward with benefits or favors in exchange for following a request.

6. Personal appeals. Ask for compliance based on friendship or loyalty

7. Ingratiation. Use flattery, praise, or friendship prior to making request

8. Pressure. Use warnings, demands, and threats.

9. Coalitions. Enlist other people to persuade others.

Page 396Page 396

Page 44: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

44

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Power in Groups: Coalitions

• Seek to maximize their size to attain influence.

• Seek a broad and diverse constituency for support of their objectives.

• Occur more frequently in organizations with high task and resource interdependencies.

• Occur more frequently if tasks are standardized and routine.

• Seek to maximize their size to attain influence.

• Seek a broad and diverse constituency for support of their objectives.

• Occur more frequently in organizations with high task and resource interdependencies.

• Occur more frequently if tasks are standardized and routine.

Coalitions

Clusters of individuals who temporarily come together to a achieve a specific purpose.

Page 398Page 398

Page 45: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

Politics Is in the Eye of the Beholder

151413121110987654321

Attentive to detailvs.PerfectionistConfidentvs.Arrogant

Practical-mindedvs.CunningAstutevs.Opportunistic

Career-mindedvs.AmbitiousCompetent and capablevs.Overachieving

Planning aheadvs.SchemingImproving efficiencyvs.Whistle blowingFacilitating teamworkvs.Forming coalitions

Encouraging change and innovationvs.Creating conflictDocumenting decisionsvs.Covering your rear

Delegating authorityvs.Passing the buckDemonstrating loyaltyvs.Apple polishing

Developing working relationshipsvs.“Kissing up”Fixing responsibilityvs.Blaming others

“Effective Management” Label“Political” Label

Page 46: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

46

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

MYTH OR SCIENCE?

“It’s Not What You Know, It’s Who You Know”This statement is somewhat true.

» While knowledge is an increasingly important source of power, knowing the right people increases your chances of getting ahead.

» Networking refers to "establishing effective relationships with key people inside" and/or outside the organization and is an important activity performed by managers who were promoted the fastest.

Page 403Page 403

Page 47: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

47

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

MYTH OR SCIENCE?A study of general managers found: 1) they fully understood the importance of networking, 2) they established a wide political network, 3) which provided them with information, 4) established cooperative relationships that could enhance their

careers, and 5) they did favors for these contacts, stressed the obligations of

these contacts, and “called in” these obligations when needed.Research indicates that a person’s location within an organization is an important determinant of his/her influence.

This evidence is not a rejection of job-relevant expertise but it indicates that “who you know” is important.

Page 403Page 403

Page 48: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

48

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Defensive BehaviorsAvoiding Action:

• Overconforming

• Buck passing

• Playing dumb

• Stretching

• Stalling

Avoiding Action:

• Overconforming

• Buck passing

• Playing dumb

• Stretching

• Stalling

Avoiding Blame:

• Buffing

• Playing safe

• Justifying

• Scapegoating

• Misrepresenting

Avoiding Blame:

• Buffing

• Playing safe

• Justifying

• Scapegoating

• Misrepresenting Avoiding Change:

• Prevention

• Self-protection

Avoiding Change:

• Prevention

• Self-protectionE X H I B I T 13–6

Page 407

E X H I B I T 13–6 Page 407

Page 49: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

49

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

Blame Culture in an Organization

When something goes wrong find the person or group to blame

Easy to doUsually political

When something goes wrong find the root cause and eliminate it

Hard to doBut very productive when done

Page 50: Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Leadership

CSE & Enterprise Systems CenterLehigh University

50

Roger N. Nagel © 2006

XIE XIERoger N. Nagel

Wagner Professor and Senior Fellow CSE Department &

The Enterprise Systems Center at Lehigh University 200 West Packer Avenue

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015(610) 758-4086, (610) 868-0402 [fax]

[email protected]