Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
April 26, 2019Global Breast Cancer Conference 2019
Symposium 5
Optimizing Anti-HER2 Therapies for HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
Optimal Sequence of Anti-HER2 Therapy
in the Metastatic Setting
Toshimi Takano, M.D.Department of Medical Oncology,
Toranomon HospitalBreast Cancer Committee,
West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG)
Conflict of Interest disclosure
Toshimi Takano
• Honoraria:
Daiichi-Sankyo, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eisai, Pfizer,
and Eli Lilly
• Research funding:
Daiichi-Sankyo, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eisai, Ono,
MSD, Merck Serono, Taiho, Novartis, Chugai
Clinical Trial Groups in Japan
WJOG9917B (NEWBEAT)
Results will be reported at SABCS 2019
Nivolumab Evaluation With BEvacizumab And paclitaxel
IIT using investigational drugs
MBC 1st lineHER2 negative
N = 51
Nivolumab Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab
Including Luminal MBCSingle-arm phase II trialPrimary endpoint: ORR
PI: Ozaki Y
・ HR+ HER2- MBC・ No CTx for MBC・ 0 or 1 ET for MBC
N = 53
Phase II trial for Luminal MBC
WJOG11418B (NEWFLAME)
Nivolumab Evaluation With endocrine therapy (Fulvestrant or Letrozole) and AbeMaciclib
Primary endpoint: ORRSecondary endpoint: PFS, OS, Safety
PI: Masuda J
Letrozole cohort
Fulvestrant cohort
6
Anti-HER2 Therapy
Current Situation
ET-resistant
Treatment Strategy for MBC
ET #1
ET #2
ET #3
Tra+Per+CT #1
Lapa+CT #2
Tra+CT #3
T-DM1
Non-life-threatening Life-threatening
HR+ HER2+ TNBC HER2+ HER2-HR+/HER2+
Tra+Per+ ETCT #1
CT #2
CT #3
CT #4
ET: endocrine therapy, CT: chemotherapy Takano T: Original
Non-life-threatening Life-threatening
ET-resistant
Clinical Questions
ET #1
ET #2
ET #3
Tra+Per+CT #1
Lapa+CT #2
Tra+CT #3
T-DM1
HR+ HER2+ TNBC HER2+ HER2-HR+/HER2+
Tra+Per+ ETCT #1
CT #2
CT #3
CT #4
ET: endocrine therapy, CT: chemotherapy Takano T: Original
1st-generationAnti-HER2 drugs
Trastuzumab
(H: Herceptin)
Lapatinib
(L: Tykerb)
Mode of action HER2 MAb HER2-TKI
Administrationdiv
q3w or q1w
po
Every day
Approval June 2001 April 2009
ToxicityInfusion reaction
Cardiac toxicity
Rash
Diarrhea
Brain mets Less effective ? Effective ?
Anti-HER2 drugs are needed all the time.
Phase III trials evaluating anti-HER2 drugs in HER2+ MBC
Endocrine therapy
Ana <Ana+H
1st line chemotherapy
PTX<PTX+H
2nd line chemotherapy (beyond PD)
X<X+H
3rd line chemotherapy (beyond PD)
L<L+H
Almost all trials were positive.
X<X+L
Let <Let +L
PTX<PTX+L
1st line H: H0648g
Slamon DJ: N Engl J Med 344:783, 2001
PTX(or AC)± HMST 25.1 vs 20.3m
P=0.046
H beyond PD
Cape+H>Cape (GBG-26)
mPFS: 8.2 vs 5.6mP=0.034
von Minckwitz G: J Clin Oncol 27:1999, 2009
PTX<PTX+HH0648g
Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab to the end?
X<X+HGBG-26
L<L+HEGF104900
XLX
P=0.00013
4.36.2Median TTP, mo
201198No. of pts
0.57 (0.43, 0.77)HR (95% CI)
Cameron D: Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533, 2008
(%)100
0
60
(week)9010 20 30 40 50
80
40
20
060 70 80
70
90
50
30
10
Switch to Lapatinib is also effective.
EGF100151: TTP
Clinical Question
Early switch to Lapatinib
vs.
Trastuzumab beyOnd PD
ELTOP study
WJOG6110B/ELTOP
Takano T: The Breast 40:67-75, 2018
Previously
treated with
Tmab and
Taxane
HER2(+)MBC
2ndor3rd line
N=170
R
HX “Trastuzumab beyond PD”
Trastuzumab+Capecitabine
LX “Early Switch to Lapatinib”
Lapatinib+Capecitabine
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45
ELTOP: PFS
Median PFS (months)
LX 7.1
HX 6.1
Hazard ratio 0.81 (90% CI, 0.55 to 1.21)
Log-rank P = .39
Pro
gre
ssio
n-F
ree S
urv
ival (%
)
Time (months)Number at risk
LX HX
43 38 25 14 8 7 7 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 043 31 22 10 6 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 0
Takano T: The Breast 40:67-75, 2018
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54
Overa
ll S
urv
ival (%
)
Time (months)Number at risk
LX HX
43 42 42 33 26 18 8 5 1 043 40 34 27 18 11 7 5 1 0
ELTOP: OS
Median OS (months)
LX Not reached
HX 31.0
Hazard ratio 0.58 (95% CI, 0.26 to 1.31)
Log-rank P =.18
Takano T: The Breast 40:67-75, 2018
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45
Time (months)
Pro
gre
ssio
n-F
ree S
urv
iva
l (%
)
5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 11 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number at risk
LX, wild type
HX, wild type
LX, mutant
HX, mutant
13 13 9 5 5 5 5 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
median PFS (months)
LX, PIK3CA wild type 8.2
HX, PIK3CA wild type 4.9
LX, PIK3CA mutant 4.1
HX, PIK3CA mutant 6.1
Hazard ratio (PIK3CA wild type) 0.38 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.93)
Hazard ratio (PIK3CA mutant) 0.60 (95% CI, 0.11 to 3.13)
PFS by PIK3CA mutations
Takano T: The Breast 40:67-75, 2018
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
5 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0
14 12 9 6 4 2 1 0 03 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
13 13 13 12 11 6 2 1 0Number at risk
LX, wild type
HX, wild type
LX, mutant
HX, mutant
Time (months)
Ove
rall
Su
rviv
al (%
) median OS (months)
LX, PIK3CA wild type Not reached
HX, PIK3CA wild type 18.7
LX, PIK3CA mutant 15.4
HX, PIK3CA mutant 15.7
Hazard ratio (PIK3CA wild type) 0.088 (95% CI, 0.011 to 0.73)
Hazard ratio (PIK3CA mutant) 1.20 (95% CI, 0.20 to 7.32)
OS by PIK3CA mutations
Takano T: The Breast 40:67-75, 2018
2nd or more-generation anti-HER2 drugs
Pertuzumab
T-DM1
Neratinib or other HER2-TKIs
DS-8201a or other HER2-ADCs
Combinations with other agents
CDK4/6-I
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
1st line Pertuzumab
CLEOPATRA:HER2+ MBC 1st line
Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab + Docetaxel
Baselga J: N Engl J Med 366:109, 2012
OS was also improvedSwain SM: N Engl J Med 372:724-34, 2015
MST40.8m → 56.5m
MST of CT alone arm in H0648g was 20.3m
CLEOPATRA1
n=808
EGF30008 6
n=219
TAnDEM 7
n=208
M770014
n=188
H0648g 5
n=469
HERNATA2
n=284
BCIRG0073
n=263
56.5
40.8
38.8
35.7
37.4
37.1
31.2
22.7
25.1
20.3
33.3
32.3
28.5
23.9
HER+DTX+PER
HER+DTX
HER+VNR
HER+DTX
HER+DTX+CBDCA
HER+DTX
HER+DTX
DTX
HER+CT
CT
LAP+FEM
FEM
HER+ANA
ANA
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
ER and/or
PgR positive
P<0.001
P=0.046
P=0.0325
P=0.98
P=0.99
P=0.113
P=0.325
1) Baselga J, et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 109-119
2) Andersson M, et al. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 264-71
3) Valero V, et al. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 149-156
4) Marty M, et al. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4265-74
5) Slamon DJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 783-92
6) Johnston S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5538-46
7) Kaufman B, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5529-37
HER2+ MBC: MST (1st line)
T-DM1: 2nd line
EMILIA
Verma S: N Engl J Med 367:1783, 2012
T-DM1: 1st line
• Stratification factors: World region, Prior neo-/adjuvant therapy (if Yes: prior
trastuzumab/lapatinib), Visceral disease
• Primary end point: PFS by independent review facility (IRF), non-inferiority and superiority
assessed
• Key secondary end points: OS, PFS by investigator, ORR, Safety, Patient-reported outcomes
MARIANNE
• HER2-positive (central) LABC or MBC
• No prior chemotherapy for LABC/MBC
• >6 months from prior neo-/adjuvant vincaalkaloid or taxane chemotherapy
N = 1095
Trastuzumab + docetaxelOR
Trastuzumab + paclitaxel
T-DM1 + placebo
T-DM1 + pertuzumab
Ellis PA, J Clin Oncol, 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting abstr 507
MARIANNE: PFS T-DM1(+Pmab) was not superior to Tmab+Taxane
Ellis PA, J Clin Oncol, 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting abstr 507
Standard Tx for HER2+ MBC
1st line
Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab+Taxane
2nd line
T-DM1
3rd or later line
Lapatinib+Capecitabine
Trastuzumab beyond PD+CT
Others
30
Anti-HER2 Therapy
Clinical Questions
1st line T-DM1?
T-DM1=Tmab+Taxane<Tmab+Pmab+Taxane
In selected patients, can T-DM1 be an option?
Elderly patients?
Patients with predictive biomarkers (e.g. PIK3CA mutations)?
HER2+ MBC
Elderly Pts65-79yo
R
Tmab+Pmab+DTX
T-DM1
<JCOG1607 (HERB TEA Study)>
Pertuzumab Beyond PD?
“Trastuzumab beyond PD” is supported by several trials.
Significance of “Pertuzumab beyond PD” is unknown.
HER2+ MBC
R
Tmab+Pmab+
Taxane
T-DM1
T-DM1+Pmab
<Proposed Trial>
PD
JBCRG-M05 (PRECIOUS)
“Rechallenge of Pertuzumab”
3rd/4th line
R
Tmab + CT
(N=218)
CT: Taxane, Vinorelbine, Eribulin, Capecitabine, or Gemcitabine
Primary endpoint: PFS
Previously treated with Pmab
HER2+ MBC Tmab + Pmab+ CT
Phase III
Best partner for Tmab + Pmab?
Tmab + Pmab + Cytotoxic agents
DTX (Phase III CLEOPATRA)
PTX (Phase II)
Vinorelbine (Phase II)
Capecitabine (Phase II)
Eribulin (Phase II)
Tmab + Pmab + Endocrine therapy
AI
Fulvestrant
ET+CDK4/6-I
EMERALD (JBCRG-M06)
HER2+ MBC 1st line, Phase III
HER2+MBC
N=480
Tmab+Pmab+Taxane
R
Tmab+Pmab+Eribulin
HER2+ ER+ MBC: Options
1st line
Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab+Taxane
2nd line
T-DM1
3rd or later line
Lapatinib+Capecitabine
Trastuzumab beyond PD+CT
Others
Tmab+Pmab+Endocrine Tx
Tmab+Pmab+Endocrine Tx(Maintenance Tx)
Anti-HER2 drug+Endocrine Tx
PERTAIN: Tmab+Pmab+AI
Rimawi M: J Clin Oncol 36:2826-2835, 2018
PERTAIN: PFS
Rimawi M: J Clin Oncol 36:2826-2835, 2018
PERTAIN: PFS (No induction CTx)
Rimawi M: J Clin Oncol 36:2826-2835, 2018
Therapy without CTx yielded a median PFS of 21.7m.
PATINA: Tmab+Pmab+ET+Palbo
Maintenance Tx after Tmab+Pmab+CT
Predictive biomarkers?
Biomarkers will guide the selection of anti-HER2 therapy in the future, but not yet.
Many candidates have been suggested.
HER2, HER2-ECD, p95HER2, HER2 mut
HER2/HER3 heterodimers
FcγR polymorphisms
Ligands (e.g. TGFα, Heregulin)
Immunology (e.g. TILs, PD-L1)
PI3K/Akt pathway (e.g. PIK3CA mut, PTEN)
CLEOPATRA
Baselga J: SABCS 2012 #S5-1
CLEOPATRA
Baselga J: SABCS 2012 #S5-1
PIK3CA mut is not a predictor of pertuzumab efficacy.
PIK3CALap + Cap T-DM1
N mPFS N mPFS HR 95% CI
Mutated
Wild-type
39
87
4.3
6.4
40
93
10.9
9.8
0.45
0.740.25–0.82
0.50–1.10
Lap+Cap(PIK3CA mutated)
Lap+Cap(PIK3CA wild-type)
T-DM1(PIK3CA mutated)T-DM1(PIK3CA wild-type)
Time (months)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 280.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
EMILIA: PFS by PIK3CA mutations
Baselga J, et al. AACR 2013
EMILIA
PIK3CA mut may be a predictor of T-DM1 efficacy.
New Antibody-Drug Conjugate
trastuzumab deruxtecan
Standard Tx will be changed?
1st line
Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab+Taxane
2nd line
T-DM1
3rd or later line
Lapatinib+Capecitabine
Trastuzumab beyond PD+CT
Others
DS-8201a?
DS-8201a?
DS-8201a is also effective in HER2-low BC
HER2-positive Breast Cancer HER2-low Breast Cancer
Modi S: SABCS2017 PD3-07
This drug will change the concept of HER2 positivity.
Summary
Tmab+Pmab+Taxane as 1st line and T-DM1
as 2nd line are current standard strategy.
Tmab+Pmab+ET is also an important
option.
We need predictive biomarkers to select
individualized therapy.
Many clinical questions remain to be
solved.
Let’s solve them in inter-group
collaboration!
Toshimi Takano
Thank you !