Upload
christopher-henderson
View
218
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nutritional Assessment
Focusing on Office Anthropometrics
Joan Temmerman, MD, MS, FAAFP, CNS
Medical Bariatrician, Clarian BariatricsAssistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Dept. of Medicine, Indiana University School of MedicineDiplomate, American Board of Bariatric MedicineDiplomate, American Board of Family MedicineFellow, American Academy of Family PhysiciansCertified Nutrition Specialist
Objectives
• Review specific issues in providing respectful care for bariatric patients
• Apply nutritional assessment to bariatric patients
• Define anthropometrics• Discuss importance• Review techniques and methods• Review equipment used
Everyone on the Healthcare Team is important!
Beauty comes in all shapes and sizes
Empathetic encounters
• Patient-centered interactions• Respect and sensitivity• Communication
– establishing rapport– attentive listening– exploration of concerns
• Avoid criticizing patients Partnership
Empathetic encounters user-friendly office
• Accessibility to office• Office comfortable• Sturdy armless chairs• Adequate restrooms• Large gowns• Step stool for exam tables• Adequate equipment
Nutritional Assessment
• Dietary assessment• Anthropometrics• Biochemical tests• Clinical evaluation
Dietary Assessment Tools
1. weight history 2. dieting history 3. dietary patterns
• food diary or daily food record (3 day diet record) • food frequency questionnaire • 24 hour recall • diet history interview
What are Anthropometrics?
• The physical dimensions and composition of the body
• Anthropometry is the measurement of body size, weight, and
proportions
• Valuable for assessing nutritional status
Lee RD, Nieman DC. Nutritional Assessment, 5th edition, 2010.
Anthropometrics
• Height (stature)• Weight• BMI• Body composition• Circumferences
• Important clinical decisions based on weight and stature
• Measurements must be as accurate and precise as possible
Measuring Height (stature)
• Do not just ask!• No shoes!!
• Head positioned in Frankfort horizontal plane
Frankfort horizontal plane
Stadiometer • Beam perpendicular• Eyes looking straight ahead• Heels together; toes pointed
slightly outward• Weight evenly distributed• Contact points: -both heels
-buttocks-shoulder blades-back of head
• Deep breath; stand as tall as possible
Weight
• One of the most important measurements
• Private setting• Scale that can weigh all
patients• Record weight silently• Avoid making
comments (focus on non-weight
outcomes)
Limitations of weight
• Does not give information about how much fat, muscle or bone (body composition)
• Muscular person may have “abnormal” weight
• “Normal” weight may mask excess fat
• Obesity= excess body fat (not excess weight)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
• Height and weight must be accurate to calculate BMI correctly
• BMI most widely used measurement to assess weight status
BMI
Limitations of BMI
• Does not directly measure body fat• Does not provide information on body
composition• May be abnormal for muscular person• Doesn’t predict fat distribution• Doesn’t take into account age or
gender
13% body fat 26% body fat
Limitations of BMI
Body Composition
The quality of weight (i.e. fat and lean tissue) is more important
than weight quantity
Body Composition
weight
% fat free mass(lean body mass)
% fat mass
What is normal range of body fat?
• Guidelines vary• As people age, they tend to
lose muscle mass and gain fat
• Sarcopenic obesity: BMI < 27; body fat > 30%
Healthy body fat women: 20-35%
Healthy body fat men: 8-22%
Methods to measure body composition
• Hydrostatic (underwater) weighing • Skinfold measurements • Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
(BIA) • Air displacement (Bod Pod)• Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
(DEXA)
Hydrostatic (underwater) Weighing
• The volume of submerged object = volume of displaced water
• Standard laboratory (research) technique
• 2-4% error rate• Not practical for
testing large nos.
• Patient submerged• All air expelled from
lungs• 3-4 measurements
averaged• Takes about 20 min• Uncomfortable &
difficult for some• Requires specialized
equipment & training
Skinfold measurements
calipers
Skinfold measurements
Skinfold limitations
• Error rate 5-10%• May be difficult in obese patients• Hard to locate proper site• Skinfold may be too large for caliper• Reliability of measurements in obese
unknown; not accurate in extremely obese
Blackburn,G. Ed., 1994. Obesity Pathophysiology Psychology and Treatment
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)
• Painless electrical current; instrument measures resistance
• The more water, the easier the current passes through
• Muscle holds more water (greater conductivity)
• More fat, higher resistance
• Calculates body water, fat-free mass and body fat %
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)
• More accurate than skinfold measurements: error rate 4%
• Affected by hydration: -Dehydration increases resistance,
overestimates body fat, -Pedal edema may decrease resistance,
underestimate body fat.
• Contraindicated for pacemakers and defibrillators
BIA
Tanita
BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS (BIA) SEGMENTAL SCALE
Air Displacement Plethysmography: Bod Pod
Bod Pod
• Similar to water displacement except air displaced
• Rapid, accurate analysis (3-5% error)• Easy for special populations (elderly,
disabled, children)• Provides resting metabolic rate (RMR)
and total energy expenditure (TEE)• Costly (machine ~ $40,000)
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)
DEXA
• Originally developed to assess bones
• Widely used for body composition
• Quick (3 minutes), safe
• Measurements may be affected by thickness and bone
Circumferencesmeasurements of specific areas
-Waist -Hips -Chest-Neck -Arm -Thighs
Waist Circumference (WC)
• Distribution of fat very important
• Apple shape high risk• Abnormal WC linked to
cardiometabolic disease (≥35 inches F; ≥40
M)
• Superior to BMI in predicting health risks
Fat distribution critical
• Energy is stored in adipose tissue
• Largest organ in body• Extensive blood
supply
• Excess intra- abdominal fat (apple shape) is high-risk
Increased abdominal fat
• Independent risk factor, even when BMI is not markedly increased
• WC better predictor of total abdominal fat than waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)
Measure waist to detect abdominal obesity
Landmarks: top of iliac crest (hip bone)
Measuring waist with pannus
Hips largest circumference below umbilicus
hips
thigh
Measurements
Thigh: just below gluteal fold
neck
Other office measurements
• Vital signs• Include BMI and waist circumference
as vital signs
• Blood pressure
Measuring Blood Pressure
• Correct cuff size critical
• Use larger BP cuffs when appropriate
• Large adult cuff: mild to moderate obesity
• Thigh cuff: severe obesity (arm>16 inches)
• Patient sitting; arm relaxed; elbow heart level
Anthropometrics• Simple, safe, non-invasive• Inexpensive, portable equipment• Produce accurate and precise data when
obtained by trained personnel
• Assess long-term nutritional status• Disadvantages:
– Don’t assess short-term nutritional status– Unable to assess nutritional deficiencies
Boyle MA, Holben DH. Community Nutrition in Action, 5th edition, 2010.
Summary
• Accurate anthropometric measurements
are cornerstone of nutritional assessment
• BMI screens for degree of obesity• Body composition (weight quality)
key measurement• Fat distribution predicts health risks
Additional Resources
• follow this link to view the process for obtaining an accurate height: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LNCuP24MSc.
• follow the following link to view proper technique for obtaining an arm circumference, waist circumference, buttocks circumference and thigh circumference:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KacU_TW50Zo.
Additional Resources
• To view the techniques for conducting a subscapular measurement, suprailiac skinfold measurement, and biocromial breadth follow this video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXFSvTCHPXo
• Follow this video link to see how a Bod Pod is used to measure body composition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elobnbT33yo