non-distructive evolution

  • Upload
    priyush

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    1/52

    Nondestructiveevaluation (NDE)

    Topic 7

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    2/52

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    3/52

    Nondestructive testing(NDT)

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    4/52

    Conventional NDE mthods Liquid penetrant inspection Ultrasonic inspection Acoustic emission Magnetic particle inspection Eddy current testing X-radiography

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    5/52

    Liquid penetrant inspection

    For detection of surface defects Inexpensive and convenient Largely used on nonmagnetic

    materials for which magneticparticle inspection is not possible.

    Unable to inspect subsurfaceflaws. Loss of resolution on porous

    materials.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    6/52

    PenetrantHigh-visibility liquid

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    7/52

    Liquid penetrant inspectionmethod

    1. Apply a penetrant to the surface.

    2. Pull penetrant to the surfacecrack by capillary action.

    3. Remove excessive penetrant.4. Extract some penetrant to thesurface.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    8/52

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    9/52

    Ultrasonic inspection

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    10/52

    Audible frequency range20 20,000 Hz

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    11/52

    Ultrasonic inspection Ultrasonic wave has higher frequency

    than audible sound. Typical frequency from 25 to 100,000

    MHz. Method: Send an ultrasonic wave

    (from a piezoelectric transducer)through the material (via a transmitting

    medium) and measure the intensity ofthe reflected or transmitted wave, andthe time it takes for the wave to bedetected.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    12/52

    Ultrasonic inspection

    Ultrasonic wave has higherfrequency than audible sound. Typical frequency from 25 to

    100,000 MHz. Method: Send an ultrasonic wave

    through the material and measurethe intensity of the reflected ortransmitted wave, and the time ittakes for the wave to be detected.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    13/52

    Through-transmission configuration(two transducers)

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    14/52Pulse-echo mode (2 transducers )

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    15/52Single transducer

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    16/52

    Single transducer connected to the materialb water an acoustic cou lin medium

    Pulse-echomode

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    17/52

    Attenuation of ultrasonic wave upon traveling through thematerial. One cycle means traveling from the front surface tothe back surface and then to the front surface.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    18/52

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    19/52

    Acoustic emission (AE)

    testing Process of developing defectssuch as cracks causes the

    emission of ultrasonic waves. AE measures the ultrasonicwaves produced by defects in a

    material in response to anapplied stress. Transducer serves as receiver,

    not ultrasonic emitter.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    20/52

    A fiber composite experiencing delamination during loadingand friction between delaminated surfaces during unloading.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    21/52

    AE applications Failure prevention

    (warning of impendingfailure; rate of AE eventsrising sharply just prior to

    failure) Locating defects

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    22/52

    Magnetic particle

    inspection

    Limited to magneticmaterials.

    Inexpensive and convenient.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    23/52

    Magnetic particle inspection method Magnetic flux lines in a ferromagnetic or

    ferrimagnetic material (resulting from theapplication of a magnetic field) are distortedaround a defect.

    Distortion causes magnetic flux lines to protrude

    from the surface at the location of the surfacecrack. This is known as field leakage. Field leakage attracts magnetic particles (Fe or

    Fe 3O 4) that are applied to the surface. Subsurface cracks near the surface can also be

    detected. Applied magnetic field is preferably perpendicular

    to the length of the defect.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    24/52

    Distortion of the magnetic flux lines due toa surface crack in a magnetic material

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    25/52

    Distortion of the magnetic flux linesdue to a subsurface defect

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    26/52

    Little distortion of the magnetic flux lineswhen the length of the defect is

    parallel to the applied magnetic field

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    27/52

    A time-varying magnetic fieldinduces a current in a copper ring.

    Faradays Law

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    28/52

    Eddy currentAn eddy current is an electric currentinduced in an electrically conductivematerial due to an applied time-varying

    magnetic field. Due to Faradays law, a voltage is generated in a conductor loopwhen the magnetic flux through the loop

    is changed. The eddy current is in adirection such that the magnetic field itgenerates opposes the applied magnetic field.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    29/52

    An axial magnetic fieldgenerated by

    a circumferential electric current

    A circumferential magnetic fieldgenerated by an axial electric

    current

    G i f dd b li d

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    30/52

    A flat sample

    A cylindricalsample

    Generation of an eddy current by an appliedmagnetic field

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    31/52

    Distortion of eddy current paths around a defect

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    32/52

    Eddy current testing method

    The impedance of an inspection coil isaffected by the presence of an adjacent,electrically conductive test piece, in

    which eddy current has been induced bythe coil.

    By varying the frequency, the methodcan be used for both surface and

    subsurface flaws.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    33/52

    Eddy current testinglimitations

    Limited to electrically

    conductive materials. Qualitative

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    34/52

    X-radiography Good for detecting internal

    defects. Method: Send x-rays through

    the material and detect the

    transmitted x-ray image using aphotographic film.

    X b i

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    35/52

    X-ray absorption(not diffraction)

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    36/52

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    37/52

    Fractography Fracture surface

    examination Different from

    metallography

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    38/52

    Introduction

    Broken cabin bolt

    from an elevator

    A il k h f d i b i l b

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    39/52

    IntroductionAn oil tanker that fractured in a brittle manner bycrack propagation around its girth

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    40/52

    Highly ductilefracture

    Moderately ductilefracture

    Brittle

    fracture

    Irreg lar & fibro s

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    41/52

    Ductile FractureIrregular & fibrousappearance

    Ductile

    fracture

    Cup-and-cone fracture in aluminum

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    42/52

    Stages in cup-and-cone fracture

    Initial necking Small cavityformation

    Coalescence of cavitiesto form a crack

    Crackpropagation Final shear

    failure at a 45degree angle

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    43/52

    Ductile Fracturemoderately ductile: most common,moderate necking before fracture.Stages: i) microvoid formation, ii)

    microvoid coalescence leading tomicrocrack formation normal tothe applied stress, iii) rapid crack

    propagation at about 45 to tensileaxis ( max) ).cup and cone fracture.

    B i l f i ild l

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    44/52

    Brittle FractureBrittle fracture in mild steel

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    45/52

    Brittle fracture

    In hard & fine-grained metals,there will be no discernible pattern.In amorphous materials, thefracture surface is relatively shiny& smooth.

    In most brittle crystalline materialscrack propagates along specificcrystallographic planes

    cleavage.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    46/52

    Brittle Fracture

    Scanning electron micrograph ofductile cast ironshowing a transgranular fracture surface

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    47/52

    Brittle Fracture

    Scanning electron micrograph showingan intergranular fracture surface

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    48/52

    Brittle fracture

    The cleavage fracture is transgranular(transcrystalline)Macroscopically the fracture surfacehas a grainy or faceted texture due tochanges in orientration of cleavageplains from grain to grain.Intergranular fracture crackpropagates along grain boundaries.This shows evidence of a weakermaterial, embrittlement.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    49/52

    Brittle fractureFracture with no obviousdeformation, fast crack growthnormal to the applied .

    Relative flat fracture surface.

    Some steels may show V-shapedchevron markings that pointback to crack initiation.

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    50/52

    Brittle Fracture

    Photograph showing V- shaped chevron markings

    characteristic of brittle fracture

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    51/52

    Brittle Fracture

    Fractured pressure vessel shell showing chevronmarks. Note that marks point to the right.

    Crack

  • 8/11/2019 non-distructive evolution

    52/52

    Initiation

    Photograph of a brittle fracture surface