Click here to load reader
Upload
h
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This article was downloaded by: [Selcuk Universitesi]On: 21 December 2014, At: 15:40Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: MortimerHouse, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil &Plant SciencePublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sagb20
Nitrification and denitrification in an alpine meadowsoil of the eastern Tibetan PlateauY. Gao a , P. Luo a , N. Wu a & H. Chen aa Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Chengdu, ChinaPublished online: 12 Dec 2007.
To cite this article: Y. Gao , P. Luo , N. Wu & H. Chen (2008) Nitrification and denitrification in an alpine meadow soilof the eastern Tibetan Plateau, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science, 58:1, 93-96, DOI:10.1080/09064710701228320
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710701228320
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose ofthe Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be reliedupon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shallnot be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and otherliabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Nitrification and denitrification in an alpine meadow soil of the easternTibetan Plateau
Y. GAO, P. LUO, N. WU & H. CHEN
Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China
Introduction
Nitrification and denitrification represent two of the
main biological processes involved in the N cycle,
which contribute to the regulation of NO3� avail-
ability to plants reduction to N2 (Vitousek et al.,
1982; Conen et al., 2000). Moreover, they represent
the main source of the greenhouse gas N2O in
terrestrial ecosystems (Williams et al., 1992). Both
processes are directly limited by substrate availability
(NH4�, NO3
�, organic C) and low temperatures, and
indirectly by water content and soil capacity to retain
water (Granli & Bøkman, 1994). In an alpine
meadow ecosystem on the Tibetan Plateau, being
characterized by an extreme climate with low tem-
peratures and a short vegetation season, inorganic
(available) N is usually present in low concentra-
tions, although alpine meadow soils are noted for
their large quantities of total N; most of this resides
in organic (unavailable) form (Cao & Zhang, 2001).
Therefore, knowledge of N transformation in highly
N limited and fragile alpine ecosystems is necessary
for managing both the N supply to the pasture grass
crop and the potential N losses to the environment.
However, there are no available data on soil nitrifica-
tion and denitrification activities in the region. In
this study we measured the seasonal dynamics of
nitrification and denitrification in an alpine meadow
soil on the eastern Tibetan Plateau.
Materials and methods
The study site is approximately 16 ha and located at
Hongyuan County, Sichuan Province, China
(33803?N, 102836?E, 3462 m a.s.l.). Annual pre-
cipitation averages 752.4 mm, with about 86.4%
received from May to September. Mean annual
temperature is 1.18C and there is no absolute frost-
free period. The highest monthly mean temperature
is 10.98C in July and the lowest is �/10.38C in
January. The soil of the study site is classified as Mat
Cry-gelic Cambisol (Chinese soil taxonomy research
group, 1995). Soil properties are shown in Table I
and were determined with standard methods (Lu,
2000). The dominant species in the study area were:
Roegneria nutans, Deschampsia caespitosa, Clinelymus
nutans, Kobresia setchwanensis, Aster alpinus, Gera-
nium phlzowianum, and Gueldenstaedtia diversifolia.
In June 2005, five 10�/10 m plots were randomly
established for soil and plant sampling on the site.
Soil and plants were sampled in the middle of June,
July, August, and September 2005. At each sam-
pling, 30 intact soil cores (5.6 cm diameter, 4 cm
depth) from the uppermost 5 cm were collected
randomly in each plot. Every five soil cores were
combined as one sample. With each plot, three
samples (15 soil cores) were using to measure gross
rates of nitrification, denitrification and N2O emis-
sions and the subsamples were using to measure soil
moisture, NH4��/N and NO3
��/N. The cores were
cooled with freezer blocks and returned to the
laboratory in insulated boxes for analysis. Above
ground biomass was measured by harvesting three
50�/50 cm quadrats in each plot. All plant samples
were oven-dried for 48 h at 658C and weighed.
Soil temperature was monitored at 0�5 cm soil depth
with specific probes (CS615, 107Temperature
probe, Campbell Scientific Inc.). Soil moisture
was determined gravimetrically. Soil extracts
were analysed for NH4��/N with the potassium
chloride-indiphenol blue colorimetric method, and
Correspondence: N. Wu, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 416, Chengdu 610041, China. Tel: �/86 28 85213782.
Fax: �/86 28 85222753. E-mail: [email protected]
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B � Soil and Plant Science, 2008; 58: 93�96
(Received 15 December 2006; accepted 19 January 2007)
ISSN 0906-4710 print/ISSN 1651-1913 online # 2008 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/09064710701228320
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Selc
uk U
nive
rsite
si]
at 1
5:40
21
Dec
embe
r 20
14
NO3��/N with the calcium sulphate-phenol disul-
phonic acid method (Lu, 2000). Gross rates of
nitrification, denitrification and N2O emissions
were determined using the BaPS (Barometric Pro-
cess Separation) technique (Ingwersen et al., 1999).
Five intact soil samples were directly filled into the
BaPS instrument and the system was closed gas-
tight and incubated at the monthly mean soil
temperature (13.3, 16.6, 15.7 and 13.38C for
June, July, August and September, respectively).
The processes for incubating lasted approximately
12 h.
Results and discussion
Soil temperature and moisture showed a similar
variation pattern over the study period, which
increased from June to July and then declined until
September (Figure 1). Above ground biomass in-
creased rapidly beginning in June and reached a
maximum of 539 g m�2 in August, which corre-
sponded well with a previous study in the same area
reported by Wu et al. (2004).
The concentration of NH4��/N in the soil tended
to increase from June to August and decreased until
September, but there was no marked difference
between July (6.40 mg kg�1) and August (6.61 mg
kg�1) (Figure 2). On the contrary, soil NO3��/N
tended to decrease between June and August and
then slight increase in September. In July, soil
temperature and moisture reached a maximum,
which benefits soil N mineralization, and accord-
ingly soil NH4��/N increased (Joergensen, 1990; Fisk
et al., 1998). Also increases in plant biomass could
potentially increase NH4��/N availability in soil
through an increase of root-derived carbon (Lata
et al., 2004). The decreases in soil NO3��/N during
the growing season can be attributed to high rates of
NO3��/N uptake by rapidly growing plants. In
September, plants gradually went into a desiccating
period and plant uptake decreased; accordingly,
slight increases in the accumulation of NO3��/N in
soil occurred. Xu et al. (2004) reported that alpine
plants preferentially use NO3��/N.
Gross rates of nitrification and denitrification
increased rapidly from June to July and then
decreased until September (Figure 3). The concen-
tration of NH4��/N regulates nitrification (Binnerup
et al., 1992). In our study, the seasonal pattern of
NH4��/N was different from that of nitrification,
but it was in accordance with soil temperature and
moisture. Burns et al. (1996) and Maag and
Vinther (1996) found an increase in nitrification
rates with an increase in soil moisture content.
Nitrification in soil is known to increase with soil
water content and then progressively to decrease
with the formation of anaerobic zones (Linn &
Doran, 1984). Although denitrification rate is a
function of NO3��/N and it is common for a higher
Table I. Soil properties at the study site. Values are mean9/S.D., n�/5.
Organic C (g kg�1) Total N (g kg�1) C/N Bulk density (g cm�3) pH
38.69/6.2 3.49/0.5 11.39/0.4 1.29/0.1 6.09/0.1
10
12
14
16
18
20
6 7 8 9
Month
6 7 8 9
Month
Soil
tem
pera
ture
(C
)
25
30
35
40
45
Soil
moi
stur
e (%
)
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
6 7 8 9
Month
Abo
vegr
ound
bio
mas
s
(g m
-2)
Figure 1. Soil temperature, moisture and above ground biomass
on four sampling dates in the study site. Vertical bars indicate
S.D., n�/5.
94 Y. Gao et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Selc
uk U
nive
rsite
si]
at 1
5:40
21
Dec
embe
r 20
14
denitrification rate to be found where NO3��/N is
higher (Chan & Knowles, 1979), our result showed
a negative response in denitrification to decreasing
NO3��/N from June to July and increasing NO3
��/N
from August to September. This also can be
explained by the variation of soil temperature and
moisture. Hill (1988) reported that positive rela-
tionships between denitrification and soil tempera-
ture are usually shown. Denitrification also can be
enhanced by higher soil moisture content (Elmi
et al., 2003). The results indicated that soil tem-
perature and moisture were the primary factors
limiting nitrification and denitrification in this
alpine meadow soil. N2O flux rate was highest in
July and lowest in September, which is similar to
nitrification and denitrification (Figure 3). N2O is
mainly produced in soils by nitrification and
denitrification (Williams & Hutchinson, 1992).
Denitrification is considered to be the major source
of N2O under most situations, while nitrification is
reported to make a substantial contribution to N2O
emissions under aerobic conditions (Williams et al.,
1998). In this study it is impossible to distinguish
the contribution of nitrification and denitrification
to N2O. Further work is needed to determine which
process between nitrification and denitrification is
actually responsible for N2O emission in this alpine
meadow.
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the Chinese
Academy of Science (KSCXI-07, KSCX2-01-09),
Chinese Science and Technology Ministry
(2001BA606A-05) and Sichuan Science and Tech-
nology Bureau (03ZQ026-043). The authors thank
J. Chen and J. Pei for their help in laboratory work,
and T. Wei for his help on identification of plant
species.
References
Binnerup, S.J., Jensen, K., Revsbech, N.P., Jensen, M.H., &
Sorensen, J. (1992). Denitrification, dissimilatory reduction
of nitrate to ammonium, and nitrification in a bioturbated
estuarine sediment as measured with 15N and microsensor
3
4
5
6
7
8
6 7 8 9
Month
NO
3- -N (
mg
kg-1
)
3
4
5
6
7
8
6 7 8 9
Month
NH
4+-N
(m
g kg
-1)
Figure 2. NO3��/N and NH4
��/N in soil on four sampling dates.
Vertical bars indicate S.D., n�/5.
20
40
60
80
100
120
6 7 8 9
Month
N2O
flu
x ra
te0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
6 7 8 9Month
Den
itri
fica
tion
(mg
N k
g-1d-1
)(m
g N
kg-1
d-1)
(ug
N k
g-1d-1
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
6 7 8 9Month
Gro
ss N
itri
fica
tion
Figure 3. Gross rates of nitrification, denitrification and N2O
flux rate in soil on four sampling dates. Vertical bars indicate S.D.,
n�/5.
Nitrification in Tibetan alpine meadow soils 95
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Selc
uk U
nive
rsite
si]
at 1
5:40
21
Dec
embe
r 20
14
techniques. Applied and Environmental Microbilogy, 58, 303�313.
Burns, L.C., Stevens, R.J., & Laughlin, R.J. (1996). Production of
nitrite in soil by simultaneous nitrification and denitrifica-
tion. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28, 609�616.
Cao, G.M. & Zhang, J.X. (2001). Soil nutrition and substance
cycle of Kobersia meadow. In XM Zhou (Ed.), Chinese
Kobersia Meadow. (pp. 188�216). Beijing: China Science
Press. (in Chinese).
Chan, Y., & Knowles, R. (1979). Measurement of denitrification
in two freshwater sediments by an in situ acetylene inhibition
method. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 37, 1067�1072.
Chinese soil taxonomy research group. (1995). Chinese Soil
Taxonomy. (pp. 58�147). Beijing: Science Press. (in Chi-
nese).
Conen, F., Dobbie, K.E., & Smith, K.A. (2000). Predicting N2O
emissions from agricultural land through related soil para-
meters. Global Change Biology, 6, 417�426.
Elmi, A.A., Madramootoo, C., Hamel, C., & Liu, A.G. (2003).
Denitrification and nitrous oxide to nitrous oxide plus
dinitrogen rations in the soil profile under three tillage
systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 38, 340�348.
Fisk, M.C., Schmidt, S.K., & Seastedt, T.R. (1998). Topographic
patterns of above- and belowground production and nitrogen
cycling in alpine tundra. Ecology, 79, 2253�2266.
Granli, T., & Bøckmann, O.C. (1994). Nitrous oxide from
agriculture. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Science,
12(Suppl), 128�131.
Hill, A.R. (1988). Factors influencing nitrate depletion in a rural
stream. Hydrobiologia, 160, 111�122.
Ingwersen, J., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Gasche, R., Richter, O., &
Papen, H. (1999). Barometric process separation: new
method for quantifying nitrification, denitrification, and
nitrous oxide sources in soils. Soil Science Society of America
Journal, 63, 117�128.
Joergensen, R.G., Brookes, P.C., & Jenkinson, D.S. (1990).
Survival of the soil microbial biomass at elevated tempera-
tures. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 22, 1129�1136.
Lata, J.C., Degrange, V., Raynaud, X.R., Maron, P.A., Lensi, R.,
& Abbadie, L. (2004). Grass populations control nitrification
in savanna soils. Functional Ecology, 18, 605�611.
Linn, D.M., & Doran, J.W. (1984). Effect of water-filled pore
space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in
tilled and non-tilled soils. Soil Science Society of America
Journal, 48, 1267�1272.
Lu, R.K. (2000). Analytic Handbook of Soil Agriculture Chem-
istry. (pp. 146�165). Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Science
and Technology Press, (in Chinese).
Maag, M., & Vinther, F.P. (1996). Nitrous oxide emission by
nitrification and denitrification in different soil types and at
different soil moisture contents and temperatures. Applied
Soil Ecology, 4, 5�14.
Vitousek, P.M., Gosz, J.R., Grier, C.C., Melillo, J.M., & Reiners,
W.A. (1982). A comparative analysis of potential nitrification
and nitrate mobility in forest ecosystems. Ecological Mono-
graphs, 52, 155�177.
Williams, E.J., Hutchinson, G.L., & Fehsenfeld, F.C. (1992).
NOx and N2O emissions from soil. Global Biogeochemical
Cycles, 6, 351�388.
Williams, P.H., Jarvis, S.C., & Dixon, E. (1998). Emission of
nitric oxide and nitrous oxide from soil under field and
laboratory conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 30, 1885�1893.
Wu, N., Liu, J., & Yan, Z.L. (2004). Grazing intensity on the plant
diversity of alpine meadow in the eastern Tibetan Plateau.
Rangifer, 15, 9�15.
Xu, X.L., Ouyang, H., Pei, Z.Y., & Zhou, C.P. (2004). Long-term
partition of ammonium and nitrate among different compo-
nents in an alpine meadow ecosystem. Acta Botanica Sinica,
46, 279�283.
96 Y. Gao et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Selc
uk U
nive
rsite
si]
at 1
5:40
21
Dec
embe
r 20
14