NIKHEF Annual Meeting 20011 Agenda NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Dec. 2001 Scientific Programme; future NIKHEF budget CERN budget Various other topics

NIKHEF Annual Meeting 2001 1

Agenda

NIKHEF Annual Scientific MeetingDec. 2001

•Scientific Programme; future•NIKHEF budget•CERN budget•Various other topics

Observations after two intenseand very interesting days

Jos Engelen, December 14, 2001


Today Tomorrow After tomorrow

Scientific Programme R&D, towards new programmes Other developments Accelerator Physics NIKHEF Budget CERN Budget

2 + 1 MFl in addition for ‘transition programme’ Onderzoeksvisitatie Universitair Onderzoek Bachelor – Master programmes Data and Computing GRID Leave it to the big centres (?) Tight but clear Impossible

One Master Programme Experimental High Energy Physics of international standing ‘owned’ by all NIKHEF partners Tight with some manoeuvring space? Very tight but good enough?

TIER 1 ½ ?

An overview:

Other topics:New staff; vernieuwingsimpuls‘Toekomst Techniek’WG OSSPSC, LHCC membershipECFA/DESY WorkshopICHEP02

Implementation of ECFA, HEPAP,Consultative Group GSFrecommendations


•Alice: techn. progress (ladder assembly tool); physics performance report in 2002•WA98:’hadron gas + mixed phase + QGP = direct photon spectrum!’•NA49: ‘charm not in equilibrium with QGP’•Chorus: NETSCAN; ‘Phase II emulsion data taking complete at the end of 2002’•Hermes: flavour decomposition p spin; G/G•ZEUS: 200 pb-1 next year; F2 charm; CC•‘Grid computing power for users within the year’•Antares ‘Deployment sector-line Autumn 2002’•Lively R&D (Mimosa; TPC RO; etc.); ‘We need a R&D group’

Observations, quotes


•‘WW in very good agreement with SM, still preliminary’ ‘recent O() calculations have large impact on TGC’s’•‘MW vs Mt (+ MH constraints) shows that SM still holds’• Expected final error 28 –39 MeV (it is perfectly OK to write a thesis on preliminary results!)•‘see the moon shadow’•HERA-B: redefinition of physics progr.; ‘the mouse is out of HERA-B’; FLT trigger impressive; viable and interesting physics programme•‘if you look at your detector in great detail the amount of material increases’; ‘LHCb tracking optimization TDR in fall of 2002’


•MDT production highly non-trivial, started!•Si strip det. Three mods built; problem with FE electr. (almost) under control•State of the art software taking shape; physics studies•D0, 12 pb-1; high quality data from Christmas; successful reconstruction of physics object from data taken so far


Statistics: 50% on physics 50% on technology,50 % from lap-tops and (almost) 20 % by women


Today Tomorrow After tomorrow

Scientific Programme

Delphi, L3 (+cosmics) e+e- > 200 GeV Chorus osc., DIS ZEUS e

p DIS, eq

dynamics 300 GeV Hermes e

N

DIS 7 GeV

nucleon spin decomp. Atlas (D0) EW symmetry breaking and much, much more Alice (+FT) dynamics hot&dense hadronic matter LHCb (HERA-B) CP violation B decays and more Antares Cosmic Neutrinos Theoretical Subatomic Physics Transition Programme: R&D etc.

ZEUS e

p DIS, eq

dynamics 300 GeV Hermes e

N

DIS 7 GeV

nucleon spin decomp. Atlas (D0) EW symmetry breaking and much, much more Alice (+FT) dynamics hot&dense hadronic matter LHCb (HERA-B) CP violation B decays and more Antares Cosmic Neutrinos Theoretical Subatomic Physics Transition Programme: R&D etc.

Linear Collider e

e- ?

factory? Other initiatives? Atlas EW sym. breaking and much, much more Alice dynamics hot&dense hadronic matter LHCb CP violation B decays and more 1 km3 ? Cosmic Neutrinos Theoretical Subatomic Physics Transition Programme: R&D etc.


And of course I. van Vulpen, W. Hulsbergen, M. Bruinsma, M. Mevius, E. v.d. Pijll, B. Petersen, J. Velthuis, M. Woudstra, D. van Dierendonck, etc., etc.

Promoties 2001

1Agasi, E. -- Jun-92Delphi Engelen, J.J. 18-Dec-012Batenburg, M. van FOM Feb-96Emin Witt Huberts, de 05-Mar-013Gulik, R. van RUL May-97L3 Berends, F../Linde, F.L. 22-Nov-014Melzer, O. FOM May-97Chorus Engelen,J.J. 11-Apr-015Mil, A. van KUN Jan-95L3 Kittel 08-Jan-016Muijs, A.J.M. FOM Jan-96L3 Duinker 12-Sep-017Mulders, M. FOM Mar-96Delphi Engelen,J.J. 05-Sep-018Rodrigues, J. -- Theorie Mulders, P.J.G. 16-Oct-019Sichtermann, E.P. -- Apr-94SMC Middelkoop, van 04-Oct-01

10Tuning, N. UvA Oct-96Zeus Kooijman 12-Sep-0111Ven, PA.G. van de FOM Jan-97NA57 Kamermans 11-May-01

Gepland 2002

Dalen, J. van F-KUN Jan-98L3 Kittel 09-Jan-02Mangeol, D. FOM Aug-96L3 Kittel 21-Jan-02Sanders, M. KUN Aug-96L3 Kittel 22-Mar-02


It is important, and not straightforward to optimally exploitthe (few!) running experiments and at the same time preparethe future ones

Inc. 2 dpIncl. 2 sp

Totaal FOM Inst. WG

Atlas(D0) 16.25 8.75 1

LHCb(HERA-B) 10.5 5.5 1

Alice (H. Ions) 6.75 2 1.75

ZEUS 4 2 0

Antares 3.25 2 0.25

Hermes 4 3 0

L3/Delphi 6.75 2.25 0

Chorus 0 0 0

Theorie 5.5 5

Overig 2.5 1.5

Alle programma's 59.5 32 4


They will join us soon:

H.J. Bulten (FOM dakpan, then VU) - LHCbA. Pellegrino (FOM) - LHCbG. Raven (FOM dakpan, then VU) - LHCbM. Vreeswijk (UvA) - Atlas

R. Snellings (FOM Springplank) - Alice

We still need further consolidation of Antares/astroparticlePhysics

Vacancy UU to be filled again, as soon as possible!


LHCCostReview.html

FCMainPoints.html

Progress21Nov.html

The CERN budget:

CERN Council meets today


The NIKHEF budget

Implementation of ‘Soest V’: reduction of budget for SubatomicPhysics to 33,5 % of FOM budget has already been realized

The NIKHEF ‘FOM basisexploitatie’ budget in long term perspective(as we ‘understand’ it today) KFl 26 073,5 (2001) KFl 23 896,0 (2005)1 000 KFl from Univ. not included yet

Werkgemeenschap KFl 3 296,1 (2001) KFl 2 470,0 + 331,0 (2005)

Universities ~ 6 200 KFl / year

(Most important issue here: instroom! NIKHEF helps whereit can! Many (young) people want to hear about quarks (andblack holes))


The ‘basisexploitatie’ at this level will lead to a deficit of O(106 HFl) from 2002 onwards...Additional income is absolutely needed (and even then...)•(AMS-IX)•DataGRID EU grants and the like (ICES/KIS)•Vernieuwingsimpuls•FOM Beleidsruimte (deadline end of January!)•...

Other worries, all financial, none technical•Atlas ECT Cold masses •Atlas Cost Overruns

•On common items such as barrel coils•Commissioning and Integration•Maintenance and Operation

We will ...


... stick to our final offer concerning ECT cold masses

Discuss the Atlas cost overruns with FOM and see whetherand on which term, over which period an additional investmentsum would be available -

2

1

.)(year

year

nMFldttSum would do the job...

The LHCb OT production infrastructure (clean room) needs to beput in place


The LHC programmes need our full attention and the lion’s shareof our resources, nevertheless it is necessary to already start tothink about the farther future, because:•lead times of HEP projects are very large•‘technical’ manpower phases out somewhat before the scientific completion of a project – very important to maintain technical expertise at the highest level

and because•it is very unlikely that the LHC gives all the final answers (it is at the same time very likely that the LHC will drastically change the face of the Standard Model)

The ECFA, HEPAP and GSF recommendations


IPPP Workshop on the future of lepton-nucleon scattering, 6-7 december 2001, Durham, UK

Key physics issues for HERA - III: 1) unpolarized deuterons in HERA: - measure F_2^n - flavour decomposition (through e+ & e-) 2) heavy ions in HERA: - expected observation of saturation at low x, which is supposedly enhanced in nuclear (high density) targets - medium effects (J/Psi prod.) that are relevant for observation of QGM at RHIC and LHC (non-linear dE/dx). 3) polarized protons/deuterons in HERA: - observation of predicted down turn of g1(x) at x < 0.01 - extraction of gluon polarization at low x - both through high p_T hadrons, and through QCD evolution of g1(x) 4) transversely polarized deuterons at HERMES: -flavour decomposition of transverse structure function h1(x) through hadron tagging -generalized parton distributions - through the observation of exclusive (vector) meson production (here transversely polarized targets are highly relevant since "exact" QCD-based calculations can be performed)

-(There were other subjects mentioned - like diffraction - which one could also do, but which are probably less appealing.)

At the same time in Durham (just an illustration of one ofmore discussions, not an encouragement and certainly nota recommendation on my behalf)....


Technical considerations: - proton polarization in HERA will be very difficult as 1800 depolarizing resonances have to passed – price tag: 30 MEuro - polarized deuterons is easier due to the reduced d magnetic moment, but no separate price tag was mentioned - heavy ions in HERA si technically possible, but electron cooling is needed to fight beam blow up due to intra beam scattering - price tag: 53 MEuro

Manpower issues: - ZEUS has little interest in HERA - III due to large reduction of manpower (to LHC) - H1 is also getting smaller, but has a much more serious interest in HERA-III - HERMES: large fraction of collaboration is interested in continuation after 2006, also with an eye on eRHIC or TESLA-N

Solution proposed by Max Klein (DESY-Zeuthen) in summary: 2007 - 2008: unpolarized deuterons in HERA, continue operation of HERMES and merge H1 and ZEUS; collect 50 pb-1. 2009 - 2010: heavy ions in HERA + detector upgrades 2011 - 2012: unify H1/ZEUS/HERMES for polarized deuterons in HERA (most likely based on H1 detector)


Aanbevelingen

De ‘toekomst van de techniek’ wordt vooral op de werkvloer vormgegeven. Toch kan FOM de ontwikkeling en het behoud van de op lange-termijn benodigde technische expertises in de FOM-instituten stimuleren. Daartoe worden de volgende maatregelen aanbevolen: Snel starten met de voorgenomen jaarlijkse bijeenkomsten voor alle FOM-technici in een bepaalde discipline (fijnmechanica, lasertechnici,

besturingsdeskundigen, etc.) om uitwisse-ling van expertise en samenwerking te stimuleren. Deze bijeenkomsten hebben een vakin-houdelijk programma en worden door de technici zelf ‘getrokken’. FOM beperkt zich tot het waarborgen dat deze bijeenkomsten plaatsvinden en is ontvankelijk voor verzoeken tot ondersteuning van gezamenlijke initiatieven die mogelijkerwijs uit deze bijeenkomsten naar voren komen.

Additionele financiering van FOM voor het vervroegd aanstellen van nieuwe technische medewerkers, vooruitlopend op de (vervroegde) pensionering van andere technici. Deze vervroegde aanstellingen zijn mogelijk voor twee situaties: (i) een medewerker met unieke expertise zal binnenkort (vervroegd) het instituut verlaten en het is noodzakelijk om deze expertise over te dragen aan een nieuwe medewerker, of (ii) het instituut wil de technische capaciteit op het gebied van besturingssystemen, data-acquisitie en/ of software-ontwikke-ling uitbreiden maar heeft hiervoor pas over enige tijd ruimte binnen de formatie. In beide gevallen is de looptijd van de additionele financiering gelimiteerd tot maximaal drie jaar.

Een OPZ-discussie over de mogelijkheden om de wervingskracht van FOM-instituten voor technisch personeel te verbeteren. Daarin wordt in elk geval gekeken naar knelpun-ten in de salariëring van bepaalde technici en naar de mogelijkheden om tegemoet te ko-men aan de eisen van technische scholen om een financiële vergoeding te betalen voor het leveren van stagiaires.

Organiseren van een FOM-workshop over versnellerexpertise in Nederland met vertegen-woordigers van in elk geval KVI, Rijnhuizen, SAF/ NIKHEF en TUE om de beschikbare fysische en technische expertise in kaart te brengen, na te gaan wat de mogelijkheden voor samenwerking zijn en om na te gaan of er op dit terrein extra maatregelen nodig en moge-lijk zijn.

Instituten stimuleren regelmatig en gestructureerd beleid te ontwikkelen voor de lange-termijn toekomst van de techniek, door ongeveer eenmaal per vijf jaar – bijvoorbeeld in het jaar volgend op een evaluatie van het onderzoeksprogramma – van de instituutsdirec-teuren een notitie of presentatie over dit onderwerp te vragen.

‘Toekomst Techniek’ Draft of FOM publicationin preparation; Preliminary


Accelerator physics (personal view; for discussion)

•novel/new/innovative accelerator principles(Tesla et al., CLIC, very high int. proton drivers,muon storage, neutrino factory, muon collider, etc.) are in our interest – primarily a task for the big accelerator labs

•university training in accelerator physics (cf. ECFA recom-mendation) – all universities teach Maxwell’s equations;‘specialization’ only at TUE•inventory of (technical) know how and the need for it(hospitals, industry, research other than HEP) will be drawnup (FOM workshop)

No immediate action by NIKHEF


A number of other issues for 2002:

•The 31st International Conference on High Energy Physicswill be held in Amsterdam from July 24 –31 2002NIKHEF heavily involved!•We have been asked to host the final meeting (conference...)of the ECFA/DESY Workshop on (physics at) linear collidersin Spring 2003•Nijmegen will organize the ‘Triangular Joint School’


In conclusion:

•NIKHEF continues to play a prominent role, nationallyand internationally•astro-particle physics is becoming part of our baseline•the scientific programme is productive and attractive; we will be ready for LHC, the next big step, and LHC should be ready for us!


OrganizersJo v.d. Brand, Jan-Willem van Holten, Jolijn v.d. Loo, Piet Mulders, Marcel VreeswijkThank you very much!

Documents

NIKHEF Annual Meeting 20011 Agenda NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Dec. 2001 Scientific Programme; future NIKHEF budget CERN budget Various other topics