Upload
rhonda-cook
View
22
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
NIH at the Crossroads: Myths, Realities and Strategies for the Future Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D. Director National Institutes of Health. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
NIH at the Crossroads: Myths, Realities and Strategies for the
FutureElias A. Zerhouni, M.D.
DirectorNational Institutes of Health
Competition for funds from the NIH and other sponsors, intensifying year by year, now stands at an unprecedented level, and shows no sign of abating. Never before have so many established investigators faced so much uncertainty about their longevity as active scientists. Never before have so many novices faced so many disincentives to entering or continuing a research career.
Dr. William F. Raub, NIH Associate Director for Research and Training, strategy paper, 1982
NIH Budget Facing a “Perfect Storm” in 2006
Federal & Trade Deficits
Defense and Homeland Security needs
Katrina
Pandemic flu
Post- Doubling effects
Physical Sciences focus
Biomedical research inflation- 3 to 5%
NIH Budget: Myths and Realities…
What is Driving Success Rates?
Is NIH placing more emphasis on applied as opposed to basic science
Is NIH shifting towards solicited research (RFAs and PAs) at the expense of unsolicited, investigator-initiated research?
Is it due to the Roadmap?
56.6%53.9% 55.2% 56.4%
52.1%
53.0%
55.2% 55.8%55.2%
56.1%
40.5%39.2%
38.4% 38.5%
39.8%
40.8%
43.5%41.0% 41.0% 40.8%
5.0%7.0%
3.7%5.7% 5.5% 5.2% 4.8%
3.6%
3.1% 3.1%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Basic Research Applied Research Other
Basic and Applied Research
What is Driving Success Rates?
Is NIH placing too much emphasis on translational science at the expense of basic research?
Is NIH shifting towards solicited research (RFAs and PAs) at the expense of unsolicited, investigator-initiated research?
Is it due to the Roadmap?
What is Driving Success Rates?
Is NIH placing too much emphasis on translational science at the expense of basic research?
Is NIH shifting towards solicited research (RFAs and PAs) at the expense of unsolicited, investigator-initiated research?
Is it due to the Roadmap?
NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
Roadmap0.8%
($237 Million)
Non-Roadmap99.2%
($28,520 Million)
FY2005 Request = $28,757M Developed to
increase synergy across NIH
Not a single initiative but over 345 individual awards in FY 2005:
― 40% basic― 40% translational― 20% high risk
What Is Really Happening?3 Fundamental Drivers
Large capacity building throughout U.S. research institutions and increase in number of tenure-track faculty
Appropriations below inflation after 2003 Increases of +3 % in ‘04,
2.2% in ‘05 and 0% in 06
Biomedical Inflation in 2004 was ~ 5%
Budget cycling phenomenon
New Grant Applications and Success Rates During and After Doubling Period
Success Rates Applications
Projected
Num
ber of Applications
% S
ucce
ss R
ate
of G
rant
s F
unde
d
31%
19%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1998 19992000 200120022003 2004 20052006 20070
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
+8,303
+8,359
22%
49,656
43,069
24,154
As Many Applicants in Past 2 Years as During Previous 5 Years!
≈
26583 - 21249
(2003) – (1999)Period of doubling
5334
31791 - 26583
(2005) – (2003)
5208
The Budget Cycling Phenomenon:What Funds are Available in any One Year?
NIH Appropriations
Committed Funds
Uncommitted Funds
Budget Increase
From ending grants started 4-5 years ago
From current year to previous year
Continuing grants
NIH Congressional Appropriations B
illi
on
s o
f D
oll
ars
DOUBLING
$13.7$15.6
$17.8
$20.5
$23.3
$27.1$28.0 $28.6 $28.6 $28.6
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
FY1998
FY1999
FY2000
FY2001
FY2002
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2007
?
The Bottom Line: Demand for Grants “Took Off” Just as NIH Budget Was “Landing!”
NIH managed well despite small increases in 2004 (2.9%) and 2005 (2%) by shifting “one time” funds from 2003 to 2004
Budget cycling effect will improve demand vs supply of grants in 2007 but we need to educate public about need for sustainability in research
The Question on Everyone’s Mind:
What are MY chances of being funded?
Payline Is Not Funding Cut-off Line
0 10 20 30 40
100
0
-
75 -
50 -
25 -
Percentile Score
Perc
ent
R01s
Funded
>99% of grants under the payline are funded
Success Rateper application
Payline
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Applicant
Applications
Succ
ess
Rate
for
R01 E
qu
ivale
nts
Fiscal Year
Success Rate files as of May 3, 2006. Program srf_indiv_060103_rfmIndividuals are determined using the pi_profile_person_id in IMPAC-II
Success Rate per Application Understates Funding Rate per
Applicant
22.3%
27.6%
Where Do We Go From Here?
Adaptive Strategies
A Vision for the Future
Strategies
First: Know the facts Second: Develop adaptive strategies
Protect the essential: Knowledge and Discovery Increase number of competing grants (supply/demand
management) Support new investigators
New Pathway to Independence Program Institutes and Centers efforts to assist new investigators
Third: Convey a unified message Increase communications about positive impact of NIH
at local, regional and national levels
Fourth: NIH’s exciting vision for the future
Biomedical Research Has Delivered Coronary Heart Disease
500
400
300
200
100
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00
Death
s p
er
10
0,0
00
Year
~ 514,000 ActualDeaths in 2000
~ 1,329,000 Projected
Deaths in 2000
63% decrease in Mortality
~ 1 million early deaths averted per year
$2.6 trillion in economic return
New, effective treatments and prevention strategies
30-year investmentper American:
~$110Total
Average investment
per American
~$3.70per year
Biomedical Research Has DeliveredCancer
Mill
ions
of
People
1971 1986 1990 2003
9
6
3
For the first time in recorded history, annual cancer deaths in the United States have fallen
10 million survivors
Advent of early detection and screening
Average investmentper American
~$8.60per year
30-year investmentper American:
~$260Total
Basic Discovery Today Provides the Foundation for Tomorrow’s
Medicine
Basic Researchand
Technology Development
Translational Research
Clinical Applications
The Future Paradigm: Transform Medicine from Curative to Preemptive
PreemptivePersonalizedPredictive
Participatory
Elias A. Zerhouni, MD, Director, NIH May 4, 2006
NIHTransforming medicine through discovery