38
Accepted Manuscript Title: New constraints on the evolution of the Gibraltar Arc from palaeomagneticdata of the Ceuta and Beni Bousera peridotites (Rif, northern Africa) Author: Thomas Berndt Vicente Carlos Ru´ ız Mart´ ınez Ahmed Chalouan PII: S0264-3707(14)00138-0 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jog.2014.09.014 Reference: GEOD 1336 To appear in: Journal of Geodynamics Received date: 25-2-2014 Revised date: 29-9-2014 Accepted date: 30-9-2014 Please cite this article as: Thomas Berndt, Vicente Carlos Ru ´ iz Mart ´ inez, Ahmed Chalouan, New constraints on the evolution of the Gibraltar Arc from palaeomagneticdata of the Ceuta and Beni Bousera peridotites (Rif, northern Africa), Journal of Geodynamics (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2014.09.014 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

New constraints on the evolution of the Gibraltar Arc from palaeomagnetic data of the Ceuta and Beni Bousera peridotites (Rif, northern Africa)

  • Upload
    ahmed

  • View
    222

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Accepted Manuscript

Title: New constraints on the evolution of the Gibraltar Arcfrom palaeomagneticdata of the Ceuta and Beni Bouseraperidotites (Rif, northern Africa)

Author: Thomas Berndt Vicente Carlos Ruız MartınezAhmed Chalouan

PII: S0264-3707(14)00138-0DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jog.2014.09.014Reference: GEOD 1336

To appear in: Journal of Geodynamics

Received date: 25-2-2014Revised date: 29-9-2014Accepted date: 30-9-2014

Please cite this article as: Thomas Berndt, Vicente Carlos Ruiz Martinez,Ahmed Chalouan, New constraints on the evolution of the Gibraltar Arc frompalaeomagneticdata of the Ceuta and Beni Bousera peridotites (Rif, northern Africa),Journal of Geodynamics (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2014.09.014

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.

Page 1 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Highlights: - Peridotites from Ceuta and Beni Bousera (Rif) have been demagnetized. - Ceuta peridotites show a different palaeomagnetic behaviour to Beni Bousera and Ronda. - Ceuta peridotites tilted at the time when Beni Bousera rotated anticlockwise. - Subsequently, the Ceuta peridotites rotated anticlockwise. - The block rotations may be younger than previously assumed.

Highlights (for review)

Page 2 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

New constraints on the evolution of the Gibraltar Arc from palaeomagnetic data of theCeuta and Beni Bousera peridotites (Rif, northern Africa)

Thomas Berndta,1,∗, Vicente Carlos Ruíz Martíneza, Ahmed Chalouanb

aDepartamento de Física de la Tierra, Astronomía y Astrofísica I, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid,Avda. Complutense, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

bDépartement de Géologie, Faculté des Sciences, BP 1014, Rabat 10000, Morocco

Abstract

The Betic Cordillera and the Moroccan Rif together form one of the smallest and tightest orogenic arcs on Earth and

almost completely close the Mediterranean to the west. For the explanation of the geodynamic evolution of the mountain

belt, palaeomagnetic data that generally found clockwise block rotations in the Iberian and anticlockwise rotations in

the Moroccan part of the mountain belt, have played a key role in recent works. This palaeomagnetic study has found

new constraints on the rotations and timing of the peridotitic bodies outcropping in the key position at the westernmost

margin of the mountain belt, in Ceuta and Beni Bousera (Rif, northern Africa).

Detailed thermal demagnetization of 115 individually oriented samples from 14 sites was combined with rock magnetic

and scanning electron microscopic experiments to analyze the magnetic mineralogy responsible for the remanences and

the mechanisms and relative times of their acquisition. In Ceuta, up to three magnetic components, and in Beni Bousera,

up to two magnetic components have been found, that are all to be interpreted as chemical remanent magnetizations

(CRM). The data suggests the following succession of geodynamic events aecting the peridotites until recent times: (1)

after their exhumation and subsequent cooling about 20 Ma ago, they recorded a characteristic remanent magnetization

of both normal and reversed polarities, carried by (pseudo-)single-domain magnetite grains; (2) after their dismembering,

the Ceuta peridotites were tilted southward by 22 − 34° about a horizontal or tilted axis (up to plunge 50°) with an

azimuth of 72°− 145 and the Beni Bousera peridotites were rotated anticlockwise by 72.3 ± 12.1° about a vertical axis

and (3) both recorded another magnetic signal of normal polarity only, carried by multi-domain magnetite grains; and

nally (4) the Ceuta peridotites rotated anticlockwise by 19.7 ± 5.9° about a vertical axis.

This study provides the rst palaeomagnetic data for the Ceuta peridotites that, with their tilt and recent small net

rotation, had a distinct geodynamic evolution from the large net rotations about vertical axes in Beni Bousera and

Ronda (Betic Cordillera). Moreover, earlier palaemagnetic data for Beni Bousera is improved, as mixed polarities have

been found in the older of the remanences for the rst time, and its interpretation as a CRM changes the rotation timing

that was proposed previously. The sequence of events exposed in this work are important constraints that need to be

incorporated in any geodynamic model of the evolution of the Betic-Rifean mountain belt.

Keywords: Palaeomagnetism; Beni Bousera peridotites; Ceuta peridotites; Block rotations; Rif

∗Corresponding author. Tel.: +447930903913Email addresses: [email protected] (Thomas

Berndt), [email protected] (Vicente Carlos Ruíz Martínez),

[email protected] (Ahmed Chalouan)1Now at: Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Royal

School of Mines, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road,

SW7 2BP, London, United Kingdom

Preprint submitted to Journal of Geodynamics September 29, 2014

*Manuscript

Page 3 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

1. Introduction1

The Betic Cordillera in southern Iberia and the Moroc-2

can Rif together form the northern and southern limbs of3

the Gibraltar Arc, an arc-shaped mountain belt closing4

almost completely the Mediterranean to the west. It is5

one of the tightest orogenic arcs worldwide, and is an ex-6

ample of two opposite processes: mountain building and7

subsequent collapse. The latter process formed the Albo-8

ran Sea in the core of the system while thrusts and folds9

propagated towards the external zones. The Gibraltar Arc10

was formed from a geodynamic process which resulted in11

the consumption of the Ligurian-Maghrebian Tethys and12

opening of the West Mediterranean Sea (Chalouan et al.,13

2008; Platt et al., 2013). This evolution started from the14

Late Eocene and lasted for about 30 million years while15

the Africa-Europe convergence was going on. In order to16

explain the evolution of the Betic-Rifean mountain belt,17

both structural analysis (e.g. Balanyá and García-Dueñas,18

1987; Frizon de Lamotte et al., 1991) and palaeomagnetic19

studies have been undertaken (e.g. Platzman, 1992; Platz-20

man et al., 1993).21

Most palaeomagnetic works (see below) indicated large22

clockwise rotations in the western part of the Betics and23

anticlockwise rotations in the the western Rif that are24

probably of early Miocene age (Fig. 1b shows some of the25

rotations found). The timing and the exact magnitude26

of the rotations, however, remains poorly constrained in27

much of the available data (see section 1.2).28

Various models have been proposed to explain the evo-29

lution of the Betic-Rif mountain belt. Amongst them are:30

Models of a collisional orogeny unrelated to any subduc-31

tion zone (e.g. Platt and Vissers, 1989); models involv-32

ing a single, NW-dipping subduction zone (e.g. Lonergan33

and White, 1997); and models involving two subductions34

zones, one Cretaceous-Eocene, E-dipping followed by an35

Oligocene-Neogene, NW-dipping subduction zone with a36

so-called Alkapeca" microplate inbetween (e.g. Andrieux37

et al., 1971; Michard et al., 2002; Chalouan and Michard,38

2004). Large block clockwise and anticlockwise rotations39

in the Betics and the Rif, respectively, favour an interpre-40

tation involving a westward slab rollback (Lonergan and41

White, 1997; Chalouan and Michard, 2004), whilst they42

do not oer an adequate explantion for deviations from43

this rotation pattern, such as the clockwise rotations in44

the Tetuan area in the Rif (Platzman et al., 1993). In45

any case, any proposed model should explain the observed46

palaeomagnetic rotations.47

In the following, we will present new palaeomagnetic48

data from the Ceuta peridotites (Sarchal clis) in the west-49

ernmost part of the Rif and for the Beni Bousera peri-50

dotites some 100 km further southeast in the Rif. The51

Ceuta peridotites have a key position just at the border52

between the Betics and the Rif and have not been studied53

palaeomagnetically before. The comparison between the54

Ceuta and the Beni Bousera peridotites facilitated the in-55

terpretation of the palaeomagnetic data from Ceuta which56

turned out to have had a more complex history than Beni57

Bousera. By using the same experimental methodology58

and putting special emphasis on the analysis of the mag-59

netic mineralogy of the two sites, parallels could be drawn60

that helped constraining the timing of acquisition of the61

NRM. Moreover, the reliability and accuracy of the palaeo-62

magnetic data of Beni Bousera that was already available63

(Saddiqi et al., 1995) could be improved by this study, in64

particular, as both normal and reversed polarity rotated65

components have been found for the rst time.66

The obtained experimental data is then used to develop67

a coherent model that explains successive tectonic stages68

of the Beni Bousera and Ceuta peridotites during the last69

20 Ma.70

1.1. Geological setting71

The Rif consists of three major domains, as indicated72

in Fig. 1a: the External Zones, the Maghrebian Flysch73

Nappes, and the Internal Zones (Chalouan and Michard,74

2004). The Internal Zones consist of three nappe com-75

2

Page 4 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

iptAlboran Sea

Betic Cordillera

Rif

Ceuta

Beni

Bousera

0 500 km

Iberia

AfricaInternal Zones

Maghrebian Flysch

External Zones

Atlantic

Ocean

(a) Geological map of the Alboran domain. After Gysi

et al. (2011).

CeutaBeni Mezala

(b) Palaeomagnetic rotations in the Betic-Rif mountain belt

after Chalouan and Michard (2004) and Feinberg et al. (1996).

Grey line indicates cross-section in Fig. 1e.

N Beni

Bousera MterFilali

Bou Ahmed

Souk-el-Had

0 5 km

BB1

BB2

BB4

BB3

BB5

BB7BB8

Ultrabasites

Kinzigites

Filali gneiss

Filali schists

Federico units

Ghomarides

(c) Geological map of Beni Bousera with sampling

sites indicated. After Saddiqi et al. (1995); Michard

et al. (1997); Chalouan and Michard (2004).

0 2 km

Ultrabasites

C. Maláguide

Gneisses

Schists

Leucogranite

Pliocene and quarternary deposits

NCeuta

El Hacho

Cala del Sarchal

(d) Geological map of Ceuta. After Sánchez-Gómez et al. (1995).

(e) Cross-section of the Beni Bousera anticline as indicated by the grey line in Fig. 1b (Chalouan and

Michard, 2004).

Figure 1: Geological setting

3

Page 5 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

plexes, at the bottom and in the SW the Dorsale Calcaire,76

then the Ghomaride nappes and at the top and in the NE,77

the Sebtide nappes (which corresponds to the Alpujarride78

nappes in the Betics). The Sebtide complex consist of a79

number of metamorphic units that are deformed by the80

Beni Bousera and the Beni Mezala antiforms (Michard81

et al., 1997). From top to bottom theses units are the82

Federico units, the Filali schists and gneisses, the Beni83

Bousera kinzigites and peridotites and nally the Sebta84

gneisses (see Fig. 1c and 1e).85

The Beni Bousera peridotites crop out 60 km SE of86

Tetouan, over an area of about 75 km2. It is an antiform87

with NW-SE oriented fold axis and the peridotites are88

mainly spinel lherzolites and harzburgites (Fig. 1e). More-89

over, minor amounts of dunite are present, and bands of90

pyroxenite constitute up to 510% of the massif (Korn-91

probst, 1969).92

In the Sarchal clis in Ceuta, peridotites crop out over93

an area of a few hectares (see Fig. 1d). It is situated be-94

tween granulitic gneisses and a pordic gneissic granitoid.95

The Ceuta peridotites form part of a more or less con-96

tinuous thin peridotitic layer that also crops out in Beni97

Bousera (Sánchez-Gómez et al., 1995).98

1.2. Former palaeomagnetic studies of the Betic-Rif99

Various palaeomagnetic studies have investigated the100

Betic-Rifean mountain chain and generally found a pattern101

of clockwise block rotations in the Betics and anticlockwise102

rotations in the Rif. Early palaeomagnetic studies involved103

mainly Jurassic and Cretaceous sedimentary rocks in the104

External Betics (Platzman, 1992; Platzman and Lowrie,105

1992; Osete et al., 1988, 1989; Allerton et al., 1993), where106

generally clockwise block rotations in the range of 40°107

70° where found, and in the Internal Rif (Platzman, 1992;108

Platzman et al., 1993), where generally anticlockwise ro-109

tations in the range of 60°100° where found. One notable110

exception were a few sites near Tetuan (Morocco), where111

Platzman et al. (1993) found signicant clockwise rota-112

tions, although the reliability of this result can be ques-113

tioned, due to its large error and/or strong tilt of the bed-114

ding. These studies interpreted the magnetic components115

they found to be primary natural remanent magnetizations116

(NRM) and hence of Mesozoic age.117

Villalaín et al. (1996), however, suggested that some118

of these components may indeed be younger remagneti-119

zations, possibly of Neogene age. Misinterpreting a re-120

magnetization as a primary NRM would not only change121

the timing constraints of these rotations, but also decrease122

(increase) the amounts of clockwise (anticlockwise) block123

rotations by as much as 35°, as the Mesozoic expected di-124

rection for stable Iberia and stable Northwest Africa was125

rotated westward compared to the Neogene expected direc-126

tion. Other studies (Villalaín et al., 1994; Saddiqi et al.,127

1995; Villalaín et al., 1996; Feinberg et al., 1996; Calvo128

et al., 2001; Villasante-Marcos et al., 2003; Mattei et al.,129

2006; Cifelli et al., 2008) found direct evidence of Neogene130

block rotations of the same pattern (clockwise in the Bet-131

ics, anticlockwise in the Rif).132

On the other hand, some studies show evidence that ro-133

tations were already completed by Neogene times, such as134

Osete et al. (2004) who found a rotated (clockwise, 35°135

140°) primary NRM on Mesozoic rocks from the Betics and136

an almost non-rotated Neogene remagnetization. Also,137

some studies on Neogene rocks (Calvo et al., 1997; Krijgs-138

man and Garces, 2004) showed no rotations. Various stud-139

ies conclude that there are no signicant block rotations140

further East of the Betic-Rifean mountain chain (Calvo141

et al., 1994, 1997; Najid et al., 1981) since the Miocene.142

1.3. Former studies of the Beni Bousera/Ronda peri-143

dotites144

1.3.1. Thermal evolution145

Various studies have investigated the exhumation of the146

Betics (for example Monié et al. (1991); Zeck et al. (1992);147

Sánchez-Rodríguez and Gebauer (2000)) and the Rif (Beni148

Bousera, for example Loomis (1975); Seidemann (1976);149

4

Page 6 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Michard et al. (1983); Ari et al. (2011)). They all gave150

similar ages in the range 1924 Ma for the last high tem-151

perature metamorphism in the crustal rocks surrounding152

the peridotites and granitoid dykes.153

Sánchez-Rodríguez and Gebauer (2000), in particular,154

investigated zircons of eclogite-bearing magmatites over-155

lying the Ronda peridotites in southern Spain and ana-156

tectic granites crosscutting both the peridotites and the157

country rocks. They established a peak temperature of158

790 ± 15°C of high pressure/high-temperature metamor-159

phism of the country rocks that is dated at 19.9 ± 1.7Ma,160

followed by a rapid exhumation of >31 mm/y with a de-161

compression from 17±1 kbar to less than 8 kbar and then a162

rapid cooling of 200340°C/Ma. The granites crystallised163

at 18.9± 3.0Ma which represents an estimate for the time164

of emplacement of the peridotites into the middle crust.165

According to Villasante-Marcos et al. (2003, and ref-166

erences therein), the post-metamorphic cooling gave rise167

to the serpentinization and the generation of a rst pop-168

ulation of sub-microscopic magnetite, until about 17-169

18 Ma ago (rst serpentinization phase). Later, up to170

millimetre-sized magnetite grains formed, mainly along171

fractures and joints. This posterior serpentinization172

phase started with the extensional dismembering of the173

peridotite slab. For oceanic peridotites, Maone et al.174

(2014) also found a sequence of serpentinization forming175

smaller magnetite grains in the early stages, and larger176

grains along fractures at later stages.177

The thermal evolution of the Gibraltar Arc is critical178

for our paleomagnetic study, as magnetic minerals can-179

not retain any magnetization above a critical temperature180

(TC or Curie temperature; e.g., 580ºC for pure, ne mag-181

netite grains; Dunlop and Özdemir, 2009). Although ex-182

humation of the Beni Bousera peridotites took place dur-183

ing the Oligocene-Miocene, P -T data shows that deforma-184

tion (folded pyroxenite layers, development of the main185

foliation) occurred during decompression from 1050ºC to186

800ºC (Ari et al., 2011), dated at 25-20 Ma. Therefore,187

peridotite rocks from the Gibraltar Arc cannot have pre-188

served any information of the geomagnetic eld before the189

above mentioned high temperature event 1924 Ma ago,190

but only after they cooled below their Curie temperatures.191

This implies that the time of any acquisition remanences192

is younger than the age of formation of their observed de-193

formation pattern.194

1.3.2. Palaeomagnetic studies in the Rifean peridotites195

Saddiqi et al. (1995) studied 224 oriented samples (11196

sites) from the Beni Bousera peridotites and found two sta-197

ble components carried by magnetite and some hematite.198

A low-temperature (LT) component with unblocking tem-199

peratures between 450°C and 550°C had a northward di-200

rection (D = 1.2°, I = 57.4°, α95 = 5.4°, without tec-201

tonic correction). A second, high-temperature (HT) com-202

ponent with unblocking temperatures between 580°C and203

650°C was found in 6 sites (38 samples) and had an east-204

ward mean direction and reversed polarity (D = 103.8°,205

I = −58.6°, α95 = 10.3°, k = 43, without tectonic cor-206

rection) that is due to the high temperature conditions207

22 Ma ago. Saddiqi et al. (1995) interpret the northward208

LT component as a post-metamorphic TRM that was ac-209

quired during the same thermal event and reject the possi-210

bility of a chemical remanent magnetization (CRM) for the211

high unblocking temperature and the results of their ARM212

experiments that indicated a single size of the magnetic213

grains. They therefore conclude that an anti-clockwise ro-214

tation of the Beni Bousera peridotites of 76±13° took place215

during the post-metamorphic cooling and was completed216

by 16 Ma.217

1.3.3. Palaeomagnetic studies in the Betic peridotites218

Feinberg et al. (1996) studied 11 sites in the Ronda219

peridotites (Sierra Bermeja and Sierra Alpujata) in the220

Betic Cordillera, and four granitic dykes intruding them.221

They performed various rock magnetic experiments and222

conclude that the main magnetic carrier is coarse-grained223

magnetite and in a few samples a small quantity of224

5

Page 7 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

hematite. About 62 % of the samples had a NE normal225

polarity magnetic component that was either stable up to226

600°C or stable up to 550°C and then reversed at higher227

temperatures to a SW reversed polarity direction. In some228

cases only a reversed polarity component was observed229

that corresponded in direction to the SW high temperature230

component. After taking antipodes of the reversed polar-231

ity directions, they obtained a mean direction of D = 46°,232

I = 47.5°, α95 = 6.6°, N = 19 (without tectonic correc-233

tion). They also found a present-day eld direction that234

was stable up to 250°C in some samples. Hence, they235

conclude that the Ronda massifs acquired their charac-236

teristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) during the post-237

metamorphic cooling, then registered a magnetic eld re-238

versal and then rotated 46±8° clockwise before the cooling239

had completely ended. They hence interpret, like Saddiqi240

et al. (1995) in Beni Bousera, the components as pure ther-241

moremanent magnetizations and they pinpoint the time of242

acquisition to the 2019 Ma period of dominantly normal243

polarity magnetic eld.244

Villasante-Marcos et al. (2003) demagnetized 253 ori-245

ented samples from the Ronda peridotites (Ronda, Ojén246

and Carratraca massifs), mainly by thermal demagneti-247

zation and in part by AF. They generally cleaned the248

samples of a magnetic component with a blocking tem-249

perature below 200°C that they interpret as a viscous re-250

manent magnetization (VRM). After cleaning the VRM,251

samples showed either only a present-day eld direction252

(20% of the samples), or single rotated direction of either253

polarity (45%), or a low-temperature northward direction254

followed by a distinct high-temperature component (20%),255

or had an anomalous behaviour (15%). The rotated com-256

ponent has a mean direction of D = 45.3°, I = 45.8°,257

α95 = 7.6°, k = 20.4 (without tectonic correction), which258

amounts to a 41 ± 12° clockwise rotation when compared259

to expected palaeodirection for stable Iberia after Barberá260

et al. (1996).261

Although the directions they found, are similar to those262

Site Latitude Longitude

BB1 35° 18.150' -4° 53.200'

BB2 35° 18.099' -4° 53.098'

BB3 35° 17.237' -4° 53.550'

BB4 35° 18.177' -4° 54.609'

BB5 35° 15.869' -4° 55.180'

BB7 35° 18.409' -4° 54.519'

BB8 35° 18.888' -4° 55.489'

SA 35° 53.373' 5° 17.750'

Table 1: Coordinates of sampling sites. Note that in the Sarchal clis

(SA) the sites were only seperated by a few tens of meters, therefore

only one position if given.

obtained by Feinberg et al. (1996), they disagree with them263

in terms of the mechanism and timing of the acquisition of264

the NRM: (1) They interpret the northward direction as265

a post-rotation VRM associated with multi-domain (MD)266

magnetite grains, as opposed to a TRM and (2) they con-267

sider the rotated directions a thermo-chemical remanent268

magnetization due to the formation of single-domain (SD)269

or pseudo-single-domain (PSD) magnetite grains. These270

SD/PSD grains formed during the post-metamorphic cool-271

ing when the massif cooled from 350400°C to ambient272

temperatures, between 20 and 1718 Ma ago. This hy-273

pothesis is supported by the observation that serpentinites274

carried mostly present-day eld directions, whereas peri-275

dotites more frequently showed rotated components, and276

in cases where both components were visible, the north-277

ward component was more predominant in the serpen-278

tinized samples (assuming that the degree of serpentiniza-279

tion is mainly due to the posterior serpentinization phase).280

2. Sampling strategy281

Sampling has been performed following standard prac-282

tices in palaeomagnetim. In total 60 oriented samples have283

been obtained from Beni Bousera (BB) and 55 from Ceuta284

(SA, Sarchal clis, southeast edge of Monte Hacho). Seven285

6

Page 8 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

sites per locality (BB and SA, positions are indicated in286

Fig. 1c and listed in Tab. 1) have been used to average out287

adequately the secular variation of the terrestrial magnetic288

eld, which makes an average of ca. 9 (BB) and 8 (SA)289

samples per site, respectively. In the case of Ceuta, it290

must be noted that the outcrop was very small, only a few291

hundreds of meters in length along the clis of the Sarchal292

beach. Sampling sites in SA have been seperated as far as293

possible (i.e. a few tens of metres), using the whole width294

of the outcrop available. Three of them were above sea295

level during low tide only, the others were always above296

sea level. In Beni Bousera, the seven sites were further297

apart, on average separated a few hundreds of meters to298

about 2 km.299

All the three previous paleomagnetic studies in Ronda300

and BB (Saddiqi et al., 1995; Feinberg et al., 1996;301

Villasante-Marcos et al., 2003) used only in situ direc-302

tions (i.e. without tectonic correction), because for all the303

observed directional components, the fold tests were neg-304

ative (i.e. tectonically corrected paleomagnetic directions305

were more scattered than in situ directions), thus indi-306

cating that remanence acquisition postdate the deforma-307

tion. These negative fold tests were performed in BB using308

the widespread antiformal foliation (Saddiqi et al., 1995)309

or in Ronda using foliation planes and the compositional310

layering (Villasante-Marcos et al., 2003). In BB, the re-311

sults by Saddiqi et al. (1995) results imply that the age of312

the older remanence is younger than the formation of the313

NW-SE trending anticline. Taking into account these pre-314

vious results, foliation/compositional layering planes were315

measured only at 4 sites from BB and SA in this study.316

Measured dip direction/dip mean values of foliation planes317

were: 345/42 (SA1), 323/43 (SA2), 327/53 (BB5), 63/66318

(BB8).319

In Beni Bousera (BB), sampled peridotites correspond320

mostly to the spinel lherzolite facies that crop out321

in the core of the massif, generally foliated and vari-322

ably serpentinized, which grade to garnet/spinel lherzo-323

lite/harzburgite in the rim of the massif (BB8 in Fig. 1c),324

where it is generally more foliated (e.g. Reuber et al.,325

1982; Ari et al., 2011). The serpentinized peridotites from326

Ceuta (SA) are foliated and highly tectonized (Sánchez-327

Gómez et al., 1995).328

Palaeomagnetic sampling strategy avoided drilling329

highly serpentinized bands when detectable at a centi-330

metric scale. Despite of this, we observed a high vari-331

ability of the degree of serpentinization between individu-332

ally oriented samples, in fact sometimes between dierent333

specimens (~10 cm3 each). The degree of serpentiniza-334

tion was measured in representative samples for each site335

(Martin-Hernandez et al., 2009), obtaining mean values of336

68.0% (SA) and 62.8% (BB) and a high variability both337

between and within sites. Samples for those sites with338

minimum/maximum values of the degree of serpentiniza-339

tion in each locality were selected for SEM analysis (see340

section 4).341

3. Experimental methods342

3.1. Thermal demagnetization343

One to two samples of most sites have been taken as344

pilot samples and thermally demagnetized with a Schon-345

stedt TSD-1 furnace with 18 temperature steps from 100°C346

to 675°C. The remaining (non-pilot) samples have been347

thermally demagnetized using a Magnetic Measurements348

MMTD-80 furnace with much smaller temperature steps.349

All samples have been demagnetized with temperature350

steps of 40°C from 100°C to 460°C. After that, samller351

temperature steps between 10°C and 30°C were used, up352

to a temperature of 620°C (SA) and 680°C (BB) when the353

samples were completely demagnetized. As both furnaces354

are known to have a temperature gradient, the samples355

have always been placed at the same positions, so that356

relative temperature steps are accurate.357

The remanent magnetization has been measured with358

an Agico JR5-A spinner magnetometer inside a Helmholtz359

7

Page 9 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

coil cage. Samples were kept in a magnetic shield most of360

the time when no measurement was being done with them.361

All samples have been measured in four positions.362

Before beginning the thermal demagnetization, and af-363

ter every second demagnetization step, the bulk magnetic364

susceptibility of each sample was measured using an Agico365

Kappabridge KLY-4S.366

3.2. Alternating eld demagnetization367

A total of 14 specimens of BB and 15 specimens of SA368

have been demagnetized by alternating elds (AF) using369

a 2G superconducting magnetometer in steps of 3 mT up370

to 15 mT and then with steps of 5 mT. Due to instru-371

mental biases at higher elds, measurements above 30 mT372

had to be discarded. Specimens of four samples have been373

demagnetized by alternating eld demagnetization using374

a Schonstedt GSD-5 demagnetizer. The sample BB7-6A375

has rst been partially thermally demagnetized up to a376

temperature of 340°C and then further AF demagnetized.377

The other three specimens have been completely AF de-378

magnetized.379

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscope380

A few selected samples have been investigated in a JSM-381

6400 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) in the Cen-382

tro de Apoyo en Investigación (CAI) for Microscopy in383

the Chemistry Faculty of the UCM. Samples have been384

coated with graphite or gold in order to improve conduc-385

tance. Moreover, the elementary compositions of dierent386

grains of these samples have been measured using energy-387

dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).388

3.4. Rock magnetic experiments389

Isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) acquisition390

curves, backeld curves, hysteresis cycles and thermomag-391

netic (Curie) curves have been obtained from selected sam-392

ples using a Magnetic Measurements Variable Field Trans-393

lation Balance (VFTB) in the CAI for Palaeomagnetism394

in the Physics Faculty of the UCM. On some additional395

samples, hysteresis loops have been obtained using a co-396

ercivity meter (Jasonov et al., 1998). Specimens of the397

same samples investigated in the SEM/EDX have been398

used to obtain low-temperature thermomagnetic curves us-399

ing a Quantum Design MPMS-XL SQUID magnetometer400

in the CAI Técnicas Físicas at the Physics Faculty of the401

UCM.402

4. Rock magnetic and SEM results403

4.1. Scanning Electron Microscope results404

Fig. 2 shows a representative image obtained by scan-405

ning electron micrsoscopy (SEM). Two samples from BB406

and two from SA have been investigated in a SEM. On407

these samples, 30 grains have been analyzed using energy-408

dispersive x-ray (EDX) to obtain their chemical composi-409

tions. Tab. 8 in the appendix lists the atomic percent-410

ages of the elements detected by the EDX for the dierent411

grains, along with a very rough estimate of the size of the412

respective grain and a possible interpretation in terms of413

minerals. This way, the following minerals have been iden-414

tied: olivine (fayalite/forsterite), pyroxene, pentlandite,415

iron-oxides (magnetite/hematite/wüstite), chromites and416

some grains containing copper-oxides. These identica-417

tions are listed in Tab. 9 in the appendix. The palaeomag-418

netically relevant minerals are then the iron-oxides, the419

chromites and the pentlandite for its common association420

with the ferromagnetic pyrrhotite. The iron-oxide grains421

investigated were about 10µm in size. In order to be able422

to distinguish better between magnetite and pyrrhotite in423

case of its presence, we have chosen to demagnetize the424

vast majority of the samples thermally as opposed to AF.425

426

4.2. IRM, backeld and hysteresis427

The IRM acquisition curves (Fig. 3 shows a represen-428

tative example) show in most cases a saturation around429

200 mT, both in BB and in SA. The back-eld curves show430

a coercivity of remanence Hcr of about 34 mT, with very431

8

Page 10 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

1516

1921

20

17

18

Figure 2: Representative scanning electron microscope image of sam-

ple SA2-3A. Arrows indicate positions used for EDX-analyses (see

Tab. 8 and 9 in the appendix).

little variation between samples. The saturation magneti-432

sation lied between 0.017Am2/kg and 1.0Am2/kg, with433

an average of 0.44Am2/kg.434

The hysteresis curves have been corrected for their para-435

magnetic components and then been used to calculate436

the saturation magnetization Ms, the remanent satura-437

tion magnetization Mrs, the coercivity Hc and the coer-438

civity of remanence Hcr. The ratio Mrs/Ms is plotted439

againstHcr/Hc in the Day plot (Day et al., 1977) in Fig. 4,440

along with theoretical curves for mixtures of SD and MD441

grains of magnetite with dierent grain size end members442

after Dunlop (2002a). Dunlop (2002b) tested his theo-443

retical curves against data from serpentinized peridotites444

and found that his peridotites fell on a novel region below445

the theoretical SD+MD mixing curves. Villasante-Marcos446

et al. (2003) plotted `fresh' peridotites and a serpentinized447

peridotite from Ronda on a Day plot and found that the448

serpentinized sample fell on Dunlop's (2002b) `novel' re-449

gion, whereas the `fresh' peridotites followed the SD+MD450

mixing curve. Similarly, the Beni Bousera and Ceuta peri-451

dotites fall very closely on the SD+MD mixing curves for452

magnetite, with the SA samples generally being closer to453

the SD region and the BB samples being closer to the454

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500

IRM

M [m

A m

2 /kg]

Magnetizing Field H [mT]

Figure 3: Representative isothermal remanent magnetization acqui-

sition and backeld curve (sample BB1-6).

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

Mrs

/Ms

Hcr/Hc

SD

MD

Dunlop (2002)BBSA

Figure 4: Day plot of BB and SA samples and theoretical curves for

SD+MD mixtures after Dunlop (2002a).

MD region. This kind of (grain size dependent) variability455

of the remanence ratios closely following the theoretical456

SD+MD mixing curves has also been observed in oceanic457

serpentinized peridotites (Maone et al., 2014).458

4.3. Thermomagnetic curves459

Fig. 5 shows representative thermomagnetic curves.460

All curves show a Curie temperature TC of about 580°C,461

which is indicative of magnetite. The curves show chemical462

changes that destroys magnetic minerals (probably mag-463

netite) upon heating, in some of them not appreciably (like464

BB1-8, Fig. 5a), but in others more prominently (like SA8-465

9

Page 11 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Ma

gn

eti

zati

on

Ms

[mA

m2/k

g]

Temperature [˚C]

(a) BB1-8

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Ma

gn

eti

zati

on

Ms

[mA

m2/k

g]

Temperature [˚C]

(b) BB5-9

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Ma

gn

eti

zati

on

Ms

[mA

m2/k

g]

Temperature [˚C]

(c) SA8-7

Figure 5: Representative thermomagnetic curves for heating and

cooling.

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Re

ma

ne

nt

satu

rati

on

ma

gn

eti

zati

on

Mrs

/Mrs

,ma

x

Temperature [K]

BBSA

Figure 6: Remanent saturation magnetization Mrs during heating

of two BB and two SA samples from 5 K to ambient temperature.

7, Fig. 5c). Fig. 5b shows that in sample BB5-9, a small466

amount of a new magnetic phase is created with a Curie467

temperature of about 320°C. Other samples also showed468

the creation of a very small amount of a new magnetic469

phase with a less clearly dened Curie temperature. The470

same kind of destruction of magnetite and the formation471

of a new magnetic phase with TC ≈ 350°C has been ob-472

served by Villasante-Marcos et al. (2003) with the Ronda473

peridotites.474

Fig. 6 shows the results of all the low temperature ex-475

periments. In these experiments, the samples have been476

cooled to 5 K and have then been saturated by applying477

a magnetic eld of 5 T. After switching the external eld478

o, the remanent magnetization of saturation Mrs of the479

sample has been measured whilst heating it up to room480

temperature. The plot clearly shows the Verwey transi-481

tion of magnetite around 120 K in all four samples. In482

addition, two of the samples (one from BB and one from483

SA) show an increase in slope between 35 K and 50 K.484

5. Thermal demagnetization behaviour485

The majority of the samples has been demagnetized486

thermally. The initial NRM ranged from 4.47mA/m to487

15A/m (median: 260mA/m). Monitoring the bulk mag-488

netic susceptibility of the samples (Fig. 7) showed a very489

10

Page 12 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Bulk susceptibility

BBSA

Figure 7: Mean bulk susceptibility of sites.

slight increase in susceptibility starting around 200°C for490

SA and a moderate increase starting around 300°C in BB,491

both reaching a maximum at around 550°C. This did not492

have a recognizable eect on the stability of the magnetic493

components, however.494

Most samples showed a very weak component at very495

low temperatures that was found to contain no useful496

palaeomagnetic data (see section 5.1). After cleaning this497

rst component, the samples still showed a heterogeneous498

palaeomagnetic behaviour one or more, often mutually499

overlapping, magnetic components: Samples from BB had500

either one or two components and samples from SA had501

one, two or three components. All of these components502

have been analyzed and are be described in the following.503

An overview of the median unblocking temperatures of504

the three components is shown in Tab. 2, and the numbers505

of samples belonging to them are summarized in Tab. 3506

and 4.507

5.1. Very low temperature component508

Most samples showed a magnetic component (in some509

cases more, in others less pronounced) at very low temper-510

atures below 180°C in BB and, to a lesser degree, below511

140°C in SA (see Fig. 19 in the appendix). These direc-512

tions show a very high dispersion but nevertheless cluster513

No. of comp. Site Comp. Temperature range

1BB 180600°C

SA 140605°C

2 BBLT 180460°C

HT 535600°C

23 SA

LT 140420°C

IT 460575°C

HT 533603°C

Table 2: Median temperature ranges used to calculate linear t lines.

LT: low temperature; IT: intermediate temperature; HT: high tem-

perature.

Site N 1 component 2 components Rejected

BB1 9 0 (0) 8 1

BB2 9 3 (2) 4 2

BB3 8 2 (1) 6

BB4 9 2 (0) 6 1

BB5 9 3 (2) 5 1

BB7 9 6 (6) 2

BB8 8 5 (1) 2 1

Total 60 21 (12) 33 6

Table 3: Number of samples from Beni Bousera with the given num-

ber of components. Numbers in parentheses is the number of samples

that showed directions clustering closely together.

11

Page 13 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Site N 1 cmp 2 cmp 2 cmp 3 cmp Rej

(IT) (HT)

SA1 7 4 (4) 2

SA2 9 6 (4) 3

SA3 8 3 (0) 3 2

SA5 7 2 (2) 1 1 2 1

SA6 8 4 (4) 4

SA7 8 1 (0) 3 4

SA8 8 1 (0) 6 1

Total 55 21 (14) 10 9 11 3

Table 4: Number of samples from the Sarchal clis with the given

number of components. Numbers in parentheses is the number of

samples that showed directions clustering closely together. In cases

where two components where visible, the higher temperature com-

ponent could either be identied with the IT or the HT component,

and the respective numbers are given in the table.

around nearly 90° inclination in BB and around a north-514

west direction in SA. In the case of BB, there was no cor-515

relation between the number of components of the sample516

and the direction of the very low temperature component.517

In SA, the mean direction of this component coincides very518

roughly with the NRM of most samples. The very high519

dispersion suggest that the measurement of the rst few520

temperature steps may be inuenced by a VRM that was521

acquired in the lab. Therefore, the remanent magnetiza-522

tions below these temperatures have not been taken into523

account for any of the calculated directions following be-524

low.525

5.2. One component (BB and SA)526

21 samples of BB (35%) and 21 samples of SA (38%) had527

only one component. In BB, these samples had unblock-528

ing temperatures between 595°C and 620°C, and in four529

cases 680°C (median: 600°C, Fig. 8d) and in SA they had530

unblocking temperatures between 560°C and 640°C (me-531

dian was 605°C). Directions have been calculated using an532

anchored line-t for the temperature range 180595°C and533

140595°C, respectively.534

As can be seen in Fig. 9, the directions of most of535

the samples (BB: 12, SA: 14) cluster around a common,536

roughly north-trending direction (normal polarity). In the537

case of BB, the mean declination of these `clustering' sam-538

ples is virtually 0°, but in the case of SA, it is slightly neg-539

ative (i.e. slightly `o' to the west). Some of the samples540

showed very disperse directions (either polarity), though,541

and were not included in the calculation of a mean direc-542

tion.543

5.3. Two components (BB)544

33 samples of BB (55%) showed two magnetic compo-545

nents, a low temperature (LT) component that is roughly546

north, and a high temperature (HT) component that is ro-547

tated and may be normal or reversed polarity (see Fig. 8a548

and 8c). The LT component showed a linear trend from549

180°C up to a temperature between 340°C and 555°C (me-550

dian was 460°C). The HT component then showed a linear551

trend starting between 380°C and 575°C (median: 535°C)552

to its unblocking temperature between 555°C and 620°C553

(median: 600°C, Fig. 8). Sometimes the two components554

overlapped. Directions of the LT component have been555

calculated using a non-anchored line-t using a tempera-556

ture range from 180°C to the highest temperature of the557

linear trend for each sample. Directions of the HT compo-558

nent have all been calculated using an anchored line-t on559

the temperature range 535595°C wherever possible, and560

in some cases on 555595°C or 575°C600°C.561

The LT component is northward (normal polarity) and562

shows a very low dispersion (Fig. 11a). The HT component563

is either normal polarity and rotated westward by roughly564

90°, or reversed polarity and rotated eastward by roughly565

90°. The normal polarity HT directions show very lit-566

tle dispersion, whilst the reversed polarity directions show567

a considerable dispersion. The directions of LT and HT568

components along with their mean directions (calculated569

seperately for normal and reversed polarity directions) are570

12

Page 14 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

up/W 0 C

180 C

180 C

490 C

490 C

(a) BB1-6B

N

up/W

180ˆC

180ˆC

555ˆC

555ˆC

(b) BB1-8B

N

up/W

100 C420 C

420 C

575 C

(c) BB5-8B

Nup/W

180 C

575 C

(d) BB5-10A

Figure 8: Zijderveld plots of BB. Solid lines are best t lines.

N

(a) BB, single component samples.

N

(b) SA, single component samples.

Figure 9: Directions (without tectonic correction) of samples that had only one component. Circles are roughly north trending directions,

diamonds are non-north trending directions. Mean direction of the roughly north-trending directions are indicated along with the α95

condence level. Filled symbols: normal polarity, unlled: reversed polarity.

13

Page 15 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

up/W

340 C

340 C

575 C

(a) SA5-2A

N

up/W

100 C

420 C

560 C

(b) SA6-2B

N

up/W

340 C 420 C

575 C

(c) SA1-4B

N

up/W

460 C

545 C

(d) SA3-1B

Figure 10: Zijderveld plots of SA samples where three components (LT, IT, HT) are visible. Solid lines are best t lines. The dashed lines

are hypothetical components that might cause the observed curvature due to overlap with the other components.14

Page 16 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

(a) BB, 2 component samples, thermal

N

(b) BB, 2 component samples, AF

N

(c) SA, 23 component samples, thermal

N

(d) SA, 23 component samples, AF

Figure 11: Directions (without tectonic correction) of samples with 2 or 3 components as obtained by thermal and AF demagnetization,

respectively. Circles represent HT component, squares LT component and triangles are IT component. Mean directions are indicated along

with the α95 condence level and have been calculated seperately for normal (black symbols) and reversed polarity (open symbols). Red

symbols indicate SA samples where all three components (LT, IT, HT) were clearly visible (the others are samples where only two components

were clearly visible). Filled symbols: normal polarity, unlled: reversed polarity.

15

Page 17 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

shown in Fig. 11a.571

5.4. Two to three components (SA)572

31 samples of SA (56%) had either two or three compo-573

nents: A low temperature (LT), an intermediate temper-574

ature (IT) and a high temperature (HT) component. The575

number of visible components did not correlate with the576

degree of serpentinization.577

In 11 samples (20%), the presence of all of these three578

components could clearly be seen in the Zijderveld plots579

(see Fig. 10b and 10c) and linear t lines could be cal-580

culated. In some cases, however, the presence of three581

components could only be deduced by a curvature of the582

Zijderveld plot (Fig. 10a and 10d): In Fig. 10a a LT and583

a HT component are linear but in-between one nds an584

S-shaped part. Such a shape is best explained by three585

components with the unblocking temperature spectrum of586

the intermediate component completely overlapping with587

those of the other two components (see e.g. Kirschvink,588

1980 for similar considerations). Similarly, Fig. 10d shows589

linear LT and IT components but the highest few tem-590

perature steps describe a curve which is best explained by591

another HT component that completely overlaps with the592

IT component. In these cases, linear t lines could not593

be used to calculate both the HT and IT component, but594

best-t great circles have been used instead to obtain an595

estimate of the HT component, whenever possible (Halls,596

1976).597

In yet other samples, only two components were visi-598

ble (Fig. 10a and 10d), in which case the rst component599

was always the LT component and the second component600

could be identied as either the IT or the HT component601

according to its direction.602

The LT component showed a linear trend (see Fig. 8)603

on the temperature range from 140°C to 340490°C (me-604

dian: 420°C). The IT component showed a linear trend605

starting at 380560°C (median: 460°) and ending at 520606

605°C (median: 575°C). The HT component showed a lin-607

ear trend starting at 380575°C (median: 533°) and ending608

at 575625°C (median: 603°C). Sometimes this led to the609

necessity of using just a single point to dene a t line610

to the origin. The temperature ranges used for the calcu-611

lation of the directions have been chosen for each sample612

individually. The LT component, however, was always cal-613

culated starting at 140°C. For the LT and IT components614

non-anchored and for the HT component anchored line-ts615

were used.616

The LT component nearly always lies between north and617

north-west and shows relatively little dispersion (α95 =618

5.1°, Fig. 11c). The HT component shows equally little619

dispersion (α95 = 9.6°) and is approximately northward.620

Looking at the LT and the HT components together, a621

striking feature is that the dispersion they show, roughly622

describes a great circle from a point in the north with a low623

inclination to a point in the west with a higher inclination.624

The IT component directions all lie in the southern hemi-625

sphere, and most lie south-west. All but ve are reversed626

polarity. They show a large dispersion (α95 = 19.8°),627

which is due to the fact that in most samples the IT over-628

lapped with the LT and/or the HT component. Hence, IT629

directions should be considered only very rough estimates.630

5.5. Rejected samples631

Six samples from BB (10%) and three samples from SA632

(5%) have not been taken into account for the palaeomag-633

netic analysis, because they showed uncoherent palaeo-634

magnetic components that were very dierent to the rest635

of the samples.636

6. Alternating eld demagnetization637

A number of specimens have been AF demagnetized.638

This permitted to compare the directions of the magnetic639

components between the two demagnetization methods.640

This way, the unblocking temperatures could be related641

to the coercivities of the respective mineral, which greatly642

16

Page 18 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

helps the mineralogical interpration of the remanences (see643

section 7.1).644

In general, thermal and AF demagnetization gave sim-645

ilar results, but because of technical problems with the646

SQUID, high eld data (>30 mT) had to be discarded647

and therefore directions obtained by AF have not been648

taken into account for nal calculation of the mean di-649

rections. For most of the AF demagnetized specimens, a650

second specimen of the same sample has been thermally651

demagnetized as well. Fig. 11b and 11d show the direc-652

tions as obtained by AF with those obtained by thermal653

demagnetization.654

6.1. Beni Bousera655

In BB, all samples demagnetized by AF showed two sta-656

ble components (Fig. 11b), a low coercivity (LC) compo-657

nent that unblocked at around 912 mT and a high co-658

ercivity (HC) component that unblocked at applied elds659

above 30 mT (the exact coercivity could not be determined660

due to technical problems). Generally, the LC component661

had a northward direction very similar to the LT compo-662

nent of thermally demagnetized samples with two compo-663

nents.664

The high coercivity component either had a west665

normal-polarity or an east reversed-polarity direction, and666

hence corresponds to the HT component of the thermally667

demagnetized samples. Deviating from this rule, however,668

there were two samples where the LC and HC components669

were `swapped', in the sense that the LC component was670

westward rotated and the HC component was north, as671

shown in Fig. 12. Moreover, two samples that showed two672

clearly distinguishable component in AF, showed only one673

component in thermal demagnetization.674

6.2. Ceuta675

In SA, all samples showed either two or three stable676

components (Fig. 11d). A low coercivity component that677

unblocked at 912 mT was present in all samples and had678

north to westward directions with normal polarity. This679

component can be identied with the LT component of the680

thermally demagnetized samples. In cases where they were681

three components, an intermediate coercivity (IC) compo-682

nent tended to be south, reversed-polarity and a high co-683

ercivity (HC) component tended to be roughly north with684

a normal-polarity and low inclination. In samples that685

showed only two components, the higher coercivity com-686

ponent showed the same behaviour as either the IC or the687

HC component. Hence, in general, the IC component of688

AF demagnetized specimens can be identied with the IT689

component of thermally demagnetized specimens and the690

HC component can be identied with the HT component.691

In one sample was this behaviour `swapped' again, and692

seven samples that showed only one component in thermal693

demagnetization showed two or even three distinguishable694

components in AF.695

6.3. Relation between unblocking temperature and coerciv-696

ity697

Fig. 13 shows the normalized intensity of the sum of698

the partial TRM's (pTRM) during the thermal demag-699

netization. Most samples were completely demagnetized700

at around 595°C, but three samples (all of BB) had an701

unblocking temperature of about 680°C (note that as the702

plot shows the sum of pTRMs, experimental noise at high703

temperatures incorrectly shows up as apparent high inten-704

sities at high temperatures as this is just an artifact,705

the unblocking temperatures of the highest temperature706

component have been determined by the absolute inten-707

sities as opposed to the pTRM sums). The plots show708

that there are at least two populations of unblocking tem-709

peratures, one that causes a major decay between 140°C710

and 340°C and another one with a major intensity decay711

at high temperatures between 535°C and 595°C. Depend-712

ing on the relative prominence of these two populations,713

samples lose most of their remanence either at low temper-714

atures, or at high temperatures, or showed a quasi-linear715

17

Page 19 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

180 C

380 C

535 C

(a) BB4-12C, thermal

N

up/W

180 C

535 C

(b) BB4-12C, thermal

N

0 mT

1 mT

8 mT

(c) BB4-12A, AF

N

up/W 1 mT

8 mT

(d) BB4-12A, AF

Figure 12: Paleomagnetic results of two specimens of BB4-12, demagnetized thermally and by AF, respectively.

18

Page 20 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 10 20 30 40

0 100 200 300

No

rma

lize

d In

ten

sity

Field [mT]

Temperature [˚C]

AF (BB7-6A)Thermal (BB7-6A)

340

Figure 14: Normalized intensity of the remanent magnetization of

BB7-6A that has rst been partially thermally demagnetized and

then further demagnetized by AF.

decay from 140°C to 595°C.716

Plots of the remanence intensity decays during AF de-717

magnetization of samples demagnetized with the SQUID718

are shown in Fig. 13c and 13d (measurements above 30 mT719

have been removed). Again, two coercivity populations720

can be distinguished, one with a major decay between 0721

and 9 mT (this is somewhat less pronounced for the SA722

samples) and another one causing a slow decay between 12723

and 30 mT or more, where again, the relative importance724

of the two populations varied from sample to sample.725

Comparing the specimens of samples that had both AF726

and thermally demagnetized, a clear correlation between727

the two unblocking temperature and coercivity popula-728

tions could be seen: The intensity decay at low tempera-729

tures corresponded to the intensity decay of low coercivi-730

ties and the one of high temperatures corresponded to high731

coercivities.732

To make the correspondence between coercivity and733

blocking temperature, sample BB7-6A, has rst been par-734

tially demagnetized by thermal demagnetization up to735

340°C and then completely demagnetized by AF demag-736

netization (Fig. 14 and 15). After partial thermal demag-737

netization, the strong decay between 0 and about 5 mT is738

not visible anymore.739

7. Discussion740

7.1. Responsible mineralogy for the NRM741

In the SEM/EDX analysis, iron-oxides, chromite and742

pyrrhotite have been identied as possible candidates for743

the NRM.744

Saddiqi et al. (1995), in their study of the BB peri-745

dotites, consider magnetite, titanomagnetite and hematite746

the most likely magnetic remanence carriers. In this study,747

however, most samples had an unblocking temperature748

of around 580°C and only three samples showed an un-749

blocking temperature of 680°C. Although, the accuracy750

of the unblocking temperature determination is relatively751

low (compare section 4.3), they clearly favour an interpre-752

tation as magnetite as opposed to hematite. Equally, only753

minute amounts of titanium have been found in the EDX754

analysis, therefore we do not consider titanomagnetite a755

likely candidate either.756

The unblocking temperature spectra showed in many757

samples a strong decay below 300°C (Fig. 13a), suggesting758

the presence of pyrrhotite. However, in the demagnetiza-759

tion, no components compatible with the Curie temper-760

ature of pyrrhotite (320°C, Dunlop and Özdemir, 2009)761

could be observed: All the LT components persisted well762

above 400°C and often showed overlap with the IT/HT763

component at even higher temperatures. Therefore, if764

pyrrhotite carries a signicant portion of the NRM, it has765

recorded the same magnetic signal as one of the other mag-766

netic minerals.767

The iron-poor endmember of the chromite series768

(Fe (Cr,Fe)2O4) has a Curie temperature of −185°C769

that increases with decreasing Cr content (Dunlop and770

Özdemir, 2009) until it reaches TC = 580°C for the iron-771

rich endmember (magnetite). Therefore, Cr may play a772

similar role as Ti, in reducing the unblocking temperature773

of magnetite, although we do not believe that this is the774

dominant mechanism for producing the dierent unblock-775

ing temperatures for the reasons described below.776

19

Page 21 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

No

rma

lize

d In

ten

sity

Temperature [˚C]

(a) BB, thermal

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

No

rma

lize

d In

ten

sity

Temperature [˚C]

(b) SA, thermal

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

No

rma

lize

d In

ten

sity

Applied !eld [mT]

(c) BB, AF

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

No

rma

lize

d In

ten

sity

Applied !eld [mT]

(d) SA, AF

Figure 13: Normalized intensity of the sum of partial remanent magnetizations during thermal (a, b) and AF (c, d) demagnetization (only

SQUID).

20

Page 22 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

0 C

340 C / 0 mT 16 mT

34 mT

(a)

180°

340° / 0 mT

10 mT

34 mT

34 mT

22 mT

100 mT

(b)

Figure 15: Paleomagnetic results of sample BB7-6A, demagnetized rst partially thermally and then by AF. The Zijderveld plot goes to the

origin at higher elds, but points have not been plotted for better visibility.

The unblocking temperatures of most samples and the777

IRM experiments suggest magnetite as the principal car-778

rier of the NRM. Notably, there is a signicant amount of779

multi-domain (MD) grains of magnetite, as can be seen by780

the very low coercivities in Fig. 13c and 13d and the Day781

plot Fig. 4.782

We believe that the there are two major grain size pop-783

ulations of magnetite that are responsible for the observed784

magnetic components in the vast majority of the samples.785

One of them is in the MD range and is responsible for the786

LT component, the other one is in the SD or PSD range787

and is responsible for the HT and IT components. This788

hypothesis is supported by the following observations:789

1. In the Day plot (Fig. 4), the samples fall almost per-790

fectly on the theoretical magnetite SD+MD mixing791

curves of Dunlop (2002a). Although Dunlop (2002b)792

found that some serpentinized peridotites fell on a793

novel region below the theoretical curve (for which794

he does not have an explanation), we believe that in795

our case the magnetic properites of the peridotites are796

dominated by SD and MD magnetite grains so that797

they follow the theoretical curve.798

2. The low temperature experiments (Fig. 6), although799

they do not reject small contributions of titano-800

magnetite, give clear indications of pure magnetite801

through a clearly visible Verwey transition. It is nei-802

ther shifted from 120 K nor depressed, hence not in-803

dicating any Ti content or surface oxidation (Dun-804

lop and Özdemir, 2009). Moreover, the experiments805

are not indicative of pyrrhotite, which has a transi-806

tion from a monoclinic to trigonal crystal structure807

around 35 K (Rochette et al., 1990). There is a808

change of slope around that temperature, however,809

the transition of pyrrhotite causes a very sharp in-810

crease in Mrs over a very narrow temperature range811

(over about 5 K), which is not seen in Fig. 6. It should812

21

Page 23 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

be noted that Dunlop and Özdemir (1997, and refer-813

ences therein) show very similar low temperature ther-814

moremanent curves for annealed crushed magnetite815

that exhibit just this change of slope around 50 K.816

3. The very low coercivities of the LC component are817

likely due to MD grains. The correspondence in di-818

rection of the LC component in AF demagnetization819

and the LT component in thermal demagnetization820

and the correlation between the intensity decay at low821

coercivities and at low temperatures support an iden-822

tication of these MD grains with the LT component.823

4. Similarly, both the IT and the HT components in SA824

have high unblocking temperatures and high coerciv-825

ities that point to grains in the PSD/SD range. Both826

components had very similar unblocking temperatures827

and coercivities. These similarities in their magnetic828

properties point to similar chemical compositions and829

similar grain sizes/shapes.830

5. Fig. 15 suggests that the grains with unblocking tem-831

peratures below 340° correspond to very low coercivi-832

ties (in this particular sample about 5 mT), and hence833

probably to MD grains. The AF intensity decay curve834

after partial thermal demagnetization in Fig. 14 has835

the shape typical of a PSD or SD grain size distribu-836

tion. Hence the HT and IT components are probably837

due to these SD/PSD grains.838

We conclude that the dierent unblocking temperatures of839

the dierent components are likely due to dierent grain840

size distributions, although Cr or Ti impurities may pos-841

sibly play a role as well.842

7.2. Acquisition of the remanence843

According to Villasante-Marcos et al. (2003) and ref-844

erences therein, there were two post-metamorphic ser-845

pentinization phases (at least in Ronda), the rst846

formed sub-microscopic magnetite and the second up to847

millimetre-sized magnetite grains, mainly along fractures.848

Hence, supposing that rst serpentinization phase created849

SD/PSD magnetite grains, they likely acquired a CRM at850

the time of their formation ~20 Ma ago. The larger grains851

from the posterior serpentinization phase are likely in the852

MD range and should as well carry a CRM from the time853

of their formation.854

This interpretation as CRMs is contrary to Saddiqi et al.855

(1995, Beni Bousera) and Feinberg et al. (1996, Ronda),856

but in line with Villasante-Marcos et al. (2003, Ronda).857

Saddiqi et al. (1995) and Feinberg et al. (1996) inter-858

pret the two magnetic components they found in the Beni859

Bousera and Ronda peridotites as pure TRMs. Their in-860

terpretation implies that the rotations they observed were861

completely nished by the time the peridotites had cooled862

to about 450°C (Saddiqi et al., 1995, Beni Bousera) and863

250°C (Feinberg et al., 1996, Ronda), respectively.864

There are, however, various observations that favour865

our interpretation of CRM's due to two serpentinization866

phases. The main reason is that some samples showed a867

very sharply separated components but others show a con-868

tinuous curvature from LT to HT component. If the acqui-869

sition mechanism was a TRM by cooling, then one would870

expect a more homogeneous behaviour: on the one hand,871

if the rotation was slow compared to the cooling time,872

one should see a curvature in the Zijderveld diagrammes873

as progressively higher temperatures should have recorded874

sequential stages of the rotation. On the other hand, if the875

rotation was fast compared to the cooling time, such a cur-876

vature should become very small (i.e. over a very narrow877

range of blocking temperatures) or completely disappear.878

Our data, however, shows both of these behaviours (com-879

pare Fig. 8a and 8b). According to the gures in Feinberg880

et al. (1996), they appearently observed a heterogeneous881

behaviour in Ronda, too. By assuming CRM to be the882

acquisition mechanism, this behaviour is easily explained:883

The two serpentinization phases (pre- and post-rotation),884

formed two dierent grain-size populations, one of them885

recording the pre-rotational and the other one recording886

the post-rotational direction. Depending on the overlap887

22

Page 24 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

of these two grain-size spectra (or equivalently blocking888

temperature spectra) one will have either overlapping di-889

rections or sharply separated directions.890

In the case of the LT and HT components, the two ser-891

pentinization phases formed very dierent grain-size pop-892

ulations (one mainly in the MD range and one mainly in893

the PSD/SD range), that in many cases did not show much894

overlap hence the components very easily isolated. On895

the other hand, in the case of the IT and HT compo-896

nents that both formed during the posterior serpentiniza-897

tion, both IT and HT components formed very similar898

grain-size spectra, but the HT component is slightly bi-899

ased towards larger grains (i.e. with higher blocking tem-900

peratures). Hence, they are strongly overlapping and not901

easily isolated.902

7.3. Palaeomagnetic directions903

Due to the existence of previous negative fold tests904

of other authors in the Beni Bousera (and also Ronda)905

peridotites (Saddiqi et al., 1995; Feinberg et al., 1996;906

Villasante-Marcos et al., 2003), we consider only in situ907

directions. As shown in those works, all the remanences908

are younger than the foliation/anticline formation. The909

negative fold test in the BB peridotites (Saddiqi et al.,910

1995), was performed using 6 sites showing a reversed, ro-911

tated component, where α95 increased from 10.3º to 22.3º912

(and k decreased from 43 to 10) after tectonic correction.913

As a rough quality control, this has been checked for the914

current study using only 4 sites from BB and SA using915

local foliation measurements. The angular dispersion of916

mean directions (Table 5) increased in both SA and BB917

after applying the tectonic correction: from 7.3 to 7.7º918

(SA) and from 25.1 to 63.7º (BB).919

7.3.1. Beni Bousera (BB)920

In the case of Beni Bousera, the samples with only one921

component showed either a non-rotated direction or a com-922

pletely dispersed direction. The dispersed directions have923

not been considered useful for palaeomagnetic purposes.924

They could be isothermal remanent magnetizations (IRM)925

that hence have not preserved their original magnetiza-926

tions. The clustering directions have probably only pre-927

served a recent (post-rotation) remanent magnetization.928

In the same way, the LT component of those samples929

with two components is probably a recent magnetization.930

LT components of these samples and the NRM of those931

samples with only one component can be considered to932

have been recorded by the same (re-)magnetization event.933

Both have been used to calculate site mean directions us-934

ing Fisher's statistics (Fisher, 1953). The mean direction935

of them is D = 2.4, I = 56.7 and α95 = 5.4°, which936

conrms that there is no vertical axis rotation nor tilting,937

as the expected declination is 0º for the last 20 Ma and938

the observed inclination coincides with the expected one939

for the last few Ma (see section 7.4). All (uncorrected)940

site mean directions are summarized in Tab. 5 plotted in941

Fig. 16.942

The HT component of samples with two components is943

likely a pre-rotation remanent magnetization. Site mean944

directions have been calculated for these samples using945

the magnetization vectors as obtained by anchored line946

ts wherever possible. In some cases the HT component947

was either too small or overlapped with the LT component,948

however. In these cases (see Fig. 17), converging remag-949

netization circles have been used to obtain an estimate of950

the HT component using the method of Kirschvink (1980)951

that combines best-t lines with best-t planes.952

Generally, HT components of a single site had the same953

polarity. The respective mean directions of normal and re-954

versed polarity sites are given in Tab. 6 along with all the955

other mean directions of the dierent components. No-956

tably, normal polarity sites have been found for the rst957

time and were roughly antipodal (i.e. westward) to the958

reversed polarity directions.959

23

Page 25 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Site Comp. Nu/N D I α95 k

BB1 LT 8/9 358.2 65.4 6.1 83.9

BB2 LT 6/9 355.9 65.4 11.3 35.9

BB3 LT 7/8 11.4 56.4 11.4 29.0

BB4 LT 6/9 3.9 56.5 7.0 93.6

BB5 LT 7/9 7.5 50.6 12.6 23.8

BB7 LT 8/8 1.6 51.6 5.7 96.3

BB8 LT 3/8 355.7 50.4 18.6 45.1

BB1 HT 8/9 289.8 72.5 4.7 137.2

BB2 HT 4/9 269.4 65.3 13.0 51.2

BB3 HT 5/8 90.2 -62.3 15.3 26.1

BB4 HT 4/9 146.4 -49.7 54.5 3.8

BB5 HT 5/9 92.6 -64.7 22.6 12.4

BB7 HT 2/8 102.4 -36.3

BB8 HT 3/8 128.9 -48.5 22.3 31.7

SA1 LT 7/7 335.1 49.9 9.1 44.8

SA2 LT 7/9 333.1 44.1 12.7 23.6

SA3 LT 3/8 342.3 51.5 26.7 22.4

SA5 LT 6/7 343.4 42.0 19.5 12.8

SA6 LT 8/8 339.5 56.0 7.2 59.8

SA7 LT 7/8 339.5 49.0 12.2 25.3

SA8 LT 7/8 348.8 51.2 4.6 174.5

SA1 IT 1/7 205.2 -44.7

SA3 IT 3/8 166.3 -49.5 38.5 11.3

SA6 IT 2/8 223.0 -19.3

SA7 IT 3/8 175.7 -41.7 12.0 106.6

SA8 IT 5/8 200.8 -19.1 23.3 11.7

SA1 HT 2/7 356.3 31.6

SA2 HT 3/9 352.3 38.1 11.7 112.7

SA3 HT 3/8 352.8 35.0 4.1 902.0

SA5 HT 3/7 2.5 31.7 13.1 90.1

SA6 HT 4/8 352.8 46.1 13.7 45.8

SA7 HT 4/8 8.8 15.9 9.0 105.4

SA8 HT 1/8 347.3 21.0

Table 5: Summary of site mean directions (without tectonic correction).

24

Page 26 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

(a) BB

N

(b) SA

Figure 16: Site mean directions (without tectonic correction) of BB (a) and SA (b) sites. Squares: group 1a and LT components of group

2 (BB) and 3 (SA); circles: HT components of group 2 (BB) and 3 (SA); triangles: IT component of group 3 (SA); grey diamonds: high

temperature component from Saddiqi et al. (1995). Open symbols indicate reversed polarity, mean directions are indicated along with α95

condence levels.

25

Page 27 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

180 C 555 C180 C

535 C

(a) BB3

N

460 C

575 C

(b) SA5

Figure 17: Calculation of directions of the HT component that overlapped with LT (BB group 2) or IT (SA group 3), respectively, using

converging remagnetization circles. α95 circles are indicated.

7.3.2. Ceuta (SA)960

From the considerations outlined in section 5, and from961

analogy with BB, the palaeomagnetic directions of one-962

component samples of SA (in particular the clustering963

ones) are likely a recent (due to the posterior serpentiniza-964

tion phase) remanent magnetization, as is the LT compo-965

nent of SA group 3 samples. Similarly as in BB, we assume966

that directions of single component samples of SA and the967

LT component of samples with multiple components have968

recorded the same event. The six samples of that showed969

very disperse single components are again considered IRMs970

and are not been taken into account for the calculations971

of mean directions. The mean direction of LT components972

directions is D = 340.2, I = 49.2 with α95 = 4.4°.973

The IT component of SA showed in many cases a signif-974

icant overlap with one or both of the other components,975

such that no reliable direction could be obtained. Never-976

theless, 15 samples had a clear, non-overlapping IT com-977

ponent. These have been used to obtain estimates of site978

mean directions. The mean direction of all sites is then979

D = 196.6, I = −36.6° and α95 = 22.9°.980

In four cases, the HT component showed considerable981

overlap and a low signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, con-982

verging remagnetization circles had to be used to obtain983

estimates of the HT components of these samples (see984

Fig. 17). The mean direction of the HT component of985

all sites is D = 356.4, I = 31.6 and α95 = 9.1°.986

All calculated (uncorrected) mean directions for each of987

the components are given in Tab. 6.988

7.3.3. Palaeosecular variation averaging989

Despite the limited number of sites involved, the mean990

directions listed in Tab. 6 can be regarded to suciently991

average the paleosecular variation (PSV) of the geomag-992

netic eld, because of the positive reversal tests of the IT993

and HT components, the α95-envelope reliability criteria994

26

Page 28 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Site Comp. N D I α95 k

BB LT 7 2.4 56.7 5.4 124.6

BB HT normal 2 278.0 69.2

BB HT reversed 5 114.2 -54.3 17.8 19.5

BB HT antipodes 7 291.0 58.0 13.1 22.0

SA LT 7 340.2 49.2 4.4 191.5

SA IT 5 196.6 -36.6 22.9 12.1

SA HT 7 356.4 31.6 9.1 45.4

Table 6: Mean directions (without tectonic correction) of the dierent isolated components. Comp.: Component (LT: low temperature; IT:

intermediate temperature; HT: high temperature); N : number of samples; D: declination; I: inclination; BB: Beni Bousera; SA: Sarchal

clis.

proposed by Deenen et al. (2011) and the eect that a995

CRM acquisition mechanism leads to a smoothing of the996

PSV signal at the specimen scale. Overlapping compo-997

nents and CRM acquisition are not ideal conditions for998

analysis of the geomagnetic dispersion or other PSV esti-999

mates, but for tectonic purposes, our results are useful.1000

7.4. Rotations and tilt1001

The expected directions for the north-west African cra-1002

ton for 20 Ma is, according to Torsvik et al. (2012), D =1003

359.9± 3.0, I = 48.5± 3.0° for BB and D = 359.9± 3.0,1004

I = 49.2±3.0° for SA. For the last 5 Ma the expected1005

direction is D = 0.0±2.3°, I = 53.3±2.0° for BB and1006

D = 0.0± 2.3°, I = 53.9± 1.9° for SA. Hence, the declina-1007

tion can be considered 0° within its experimental error for1008

the last 20 Ma. Although, the evolution of the palaeodirec-1009

tion is strongly smoothed (with running averages of 20 Ma1010

windows), a trend from slightly lower to slightly higher in-1011

clinations is evident that is due to the northward shift of1012

the African plate.1013

7.4.1. Beni Bousera (BB)1014

The direction obtained for the HT component of BB,1015

after taking antipodes of the reversed polarity directions,1016

is D = 291.0 ± 25.3°, I = 58.0 ± 13.1° (see Tab. 6). Simi-1017

larly, Saddiqi et al. (1995) obtained a direction of their HT1018

component (after taking antipodes) of D = 283.8 ± 20.1°,1019

I = −58.6±10.3. Using the values given by Torsvik et al.1020

(2012), the HT component gives an anti-clockwise rotation1021

about a vertical axis of 68.9±20.4° and a attening param-1022

eter of F = −9.5 ± 10.8° (see Tab. 7), which means that a1023

slight tilt (<10º and posterior to the anticline formation,1024

which predate the remanences) can neither be rejected nor1025

conrmed.1026

Combining the data of Saddiqi et al. (1995) and of this1027

study, the certainty of the rotation can be improved (see1028

Fig. 16a). By taking the antipodes of reversed polarity1029

directions one obtains a mean direction with D = 287.6°,1030

I = 58.8, α95 = 7.6, k = 30.4, which implies an anti-1031

clockwise rotation of 72.3 ± 12.1°.1032

The LT component of BB has a similar inclination of1033

56.7° (Saddiqi et al. (1995) obtained I = 57.4°) and a1034

declination of 2.4°. For the expected direction for the last1035

5 Ma, this represents a attening parameter of F = −3.4±1036

4.6°, and we can assume no tilt and no rotation for the LT1037

component.1038

7.4.2. Ceuta (SA)1039

Both the IT (after taking antipodes) and the HT compo-1040

nent of SA have similar, low inclinations (I = 36.6± 22.9°1041

and I = 31.6±9.1°, respectively).1042

Using the in situ IT/HT mean results from SA listed1043

27

Page 29 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Site Component Data from R± ∆R F ± ∆F

BB

HT this work 68.9 ± 20.4° −9.5 ± 10.8°

HT Saddiqi et al.* 76.1 ± 16.2° −10.1 ± 8.6°

HT combined 72.3 ± 12.1° −10.1 ± 6.5°

LT this work 2.4 ± 8.1° −3.4 ± 4.6°

LT Saddiqi et al.* 1.3 ± 8.3° −4.1 ± 4.6°

SA

HT this work 3.5 ± 8.9° 17.6 ± 7.7°

IT this work −16.7 ± 23.3° 12.6 ± 18.5°

LT this work 19.7 ± 5.9° 0.0 ± 4.2°

Table 7: Rotations R (observed minus expected declinations; positive values are clockwise rotations) and attening of inclination F (expected

minus observed inclination) parameters with their condence limits (Demarest, 1983). *: The rotations of Saddiqi et al. (1995) have been

re-calculated using the expected directions from Torsvik et al. (2012).

in Table 6, a reversal test and their quality classication1044

has been performed following McFadden and McElhinny1045

(1990), giving a positive type C result. As the angle be-1046

tween the two mean directions (in the same hemisphere),1047

γO = 17.4º, is smaller than the critical angle γC = 19.6º1048

at which the hypothesis of a common mean direction for1049

the distribution would be rejected, the test is positive1050

(type C results are those where 10º < γC ≤ 20º). Hence,1051

the hypothesis of a common mean direction may not be1052

rejected at the 95-percent condence level. The antipo-1053

dal character of IT and HT mean directions do not favour1054

any interpretation involving local deformation occurring1055

between the two acquisition times.1056

We argue that the IT component recorded roughly the1057

same magnetization event, but with the opposite polarity1058

of the Earth's magnetic eld and we interpret the antipo-1059

dal mist as due to (1) an overlap of the IT component1060

with the two other components and (2) insucient averag-1061

ing of the secular variation due to the small sampling set.1062

Because of the large uncertainty of the IT component, its1063

direction will not be used in the arguments following in1064

the next section.1065

The HT component has a attening parameter of F =1066

17.6 ± 7.7° with respect to the expected direction. In dec-1067

lination, it coincides with the expected direction (at any1068

time during the last 20 Ma).1069

The LT direction of SA has a direction of D = 340.2°,1070

I = 49.2° and has therefore the expected inclination (F =1071

0.0 ± 4.2°) but is rotated about a vertical axis by 19.7 ±1072

5.9° in an anti-clockwise sense with respect to stable NW1073

Africa.1074

7.5. Palaeomagnetic constraints on timing and geody-1075

namic evolution1076

As described in section 7.2, the IT (of SA) and HT (of1077

BB and SA) components are likely due to the rst ser-1078

pentinization stage during the post-metamorphic cooling,1079

after the deformation (foliation, folded pyroxenite veins)1080

dated between 2520 Ma ago, and after the BB (undated)1081

age of folding. The LT components are likely due to a pos-1082

terior serpentinization. Then, in Beni Bousera the older1083

component (HT) is rotated, whilst the younger one (LT) is1084

present-day north, and there is no tilt appearent in neither1085

component.1086

In SA, the older HT component points north but is tilted1087

and the younger LT component is rotated about a verti-1088

cal axis but has no tilt. As the HT and IT components1089

are roughly antipodal, we argue that the IT and HT com-1090

28

Page 30 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

ponents were roughly recorded at the same time. Due1091

to the similarities in mineralogy we also argue that the1092

acquisition times roughly coincide between the respective1093

components of SA and BB.1094

We therefore propose the following model of a relative1095

sequence of events leading to the observed remanent mag-1096

netizations: after their exhumation and post-metamorphic1097

cooling, both the Beni Bousera massif and the Sarchal1098

massif (Ceuta) recorded a rst magnetic component dur-1099

ing a rst serpentinization phase (Fig. 18a). During this1100

time, at least one geomagnetic eld reversal occured that1101

was recorded by both BB and SA. In SA, it is noteworthy1102

that the reversed polarity directions have systematically1103

lower unblocking temperatures. This may be explained if1104

at some point during the rst serpentinzation the size dis-1105

tribution of the newly formed grains changed slightly. This1106

would then imply that there occured exactly one eld re-1107

versal during the acquisition of remanence in SA, recording1108

one polarity by one grain size distribution and the other1109

polarity by another grain size distribution.1110

After the acquisition of the rst remanence, the peri-1111

dotites dismembered and BB rotated by 72.3±12.1° (data1112

from this work and Saddiqi et al. (1995)) in an anticlock-1113

wise direction about a vertical axis (Fig. 18b). Then,1114

the BB peridotites recorded another magnetic component1115

(LT), probably during the formation of larger magnetite1116

grains during the posterior serpentinization. After that1117

there were no further net rotations in the BB massif.1118

In order to explain the geodynamic evolution of the1119

Ceuta peridotites with the least number of rotations pos-1120

sible, we rst observe that the young LT component of1121

SA describes a 19.8° anticlockwise rotation about a ver-1122

tical axis with respect to the expected direction of stable1123

NW Africa. By rotating the measured directions by an1124

equal amount in the opposite direction, we nd the mag-1125

netic directions of the peridotites as they must have been1126

at the time of the acquisition of the young LT component.1127

From there, by comparing both declination and inclina-1128

tion of the LT and the HT (assuming the IT component1129

to be antipodal to HT), one nds that the older HT (and1130

IT) component can be interpreted as a (pure) a tilt of 25°1131

(with the south-west going downwards) about a horizontal1132

axis with azimuth 145° with respect to the expected direc-1133

tion of stable NW Africa. Alternatively, one could choose1134

dierent rotation axes up to a plunge of -50° to describe1135

the rotation between the acquisition of the HT and the LT1136

components. A rotation axis of plunge -50° would have an1137

azimuth of 72° and a rotation about 30° (clockwise and1138

south-east going downwards). The smallest possible rota-1139

tion between the two components is a rotation of about1140

22° about an axis of azimuth ca. 115° and plunge ca. -30°1141

(south going downwards).1142

Hence, after the acquisition of the HT and IT compo-1143

nents, the SA massif tilted with the south moving down-1144

wards (Fig. 18b) at the same relative time when the ro-1145

tation of BB took place. Then, the SA peridotites ac-1146

quired the LT component during another serpentinization1147

phase. Afterwards, they rotated 19.7 ± 5.9° about a verti-1148

cal axis in an anti-clockwise fashion (Fig. 18d). Note that,1149

even if the relatively small rotations in SA were disputed1150

because of palaeosecular variation, small-scale tectonic de-1151

formations, etc., an important fact that future geodynamic1152

models have to incorporate is that the SA peridotites did1153

not experience any large vertical-axis rotations that the1154

BB and Ronda peridotites experienced.1155

8. Conclusions1156

This study has obtained new data about the magnetic1157

mineralogy and the remanences of the Rifean peridotites1158

including for the rst time those located in Ceuta. Very1159

detailed thermal and AF demagnetization, rock magnetic1160

and SEM experiments suggested dierent candidates of1161

magnetic minerals but indicated that the magnetic rema-1162

nences of the peridotites are mostly carried by magnetite.1163

There exist two distinct grain size populations of mag-1164

netite: one in the SD/PSD range (sometimes with over-1165

29

Page 31 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

(a) Exhumation of the SA, BB and Ronda peridotites, followed by cooling, serpentinization, deformation,

formation of SD magnetite grains and acquisition of a high and intermediate temperature CRM (younger

than the 20-25 Ma foliation ages and spanning periods of normal and reversed polarities).

(b) Dismembering and large vertical-axis rotations (anticlockwise in BB and clockwise in Ronda) and tilt

(SA, the horizontal axis of this rotation is indicated in the equal area diagramme).

(c) Another serpentinization, formation of MD magnetite grains and acquisition of a low temperature CRM

(covering only a normal polarity period).

(d) Small anticlockwise rotation of SA. Note that the nal stage correspoonds with in situ observed directions.

Figure 18: Schematic diagrammes of the net rotations proposed for the Ceuta and Beni Bousera peridotites in successive stages. The boxes

represent the Ceuta (SA), the Beni Bousera (BB) and the Ronda peridotites (note that the boxes do not indicate any accurate geographical

location). The acquisition and in-situ rotations of the magnetic LT (blue squares), IT (yellow triangles) and HT (red circles) components.

30

Page 32 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

lapping reversed and normal polarities) and one in the MD1166

range (always normal polarity) that carry dierent direc-1167

tional components. Hence, contrary to earlier studies in1168

BB, the mechanism of remanence acquisition of all the1169

magnetic components in both the BB and SA peridotites1170

is most likely a CRM (note that the serpentinization pro-1171

cesses causing a CRM are beyond the scope of this palaeo-1172

magnetic study).1173

Integrating the results of the all the experiments, a se-1174

quence of geodynamic stages can be inferred (note that1175

we cannot infer any longitudinal or latitudinal constrains1176

paleomagnetically, but only rotations):1177

1. A rst remanent magnetization, of both normal and1178

reversed polarities, was acquired by the BB and SA1179

peridotites by the formation of SD/PSD magnetite1180

grains during a serpentinization phase after their ex-1181

humation and subsequent cooling (postdating high1182

temperature deformation and the age of folding of the1183

BB anticline) about 20 Ma ago.1184

2. After their dismembering, the Ceuta peridotites, un-1185

like their BB and Ronda counterparts, were tilted1186

by some 22-30°, south moving downwards. The Beni1187

Bousera peridotites were rotated anticlockwise by 72.31188

± 12.1° about a vertical axis. The reliability of this1189

rotation has been improved in this study by the rst1190

observation of normal polarity directions of the older1191

HT component of BB. Moreover, whilst a TRM as1192

the mechanism of remanence acquisition, as was sug-1193

gested in earlier works, would imply a rapid rota-1194

tion of BB that took only two consecutive subchrons1195

and was completely nished by the end of the post-1196

metamorphic cooling (16 Ma), our interpretation as a1197

CRM favour a rotation posterior to the serpentiniza-1198

tion of the post-metamorphic cooling and does not1199

require such a fast rotation.1200

3. At a later stage, both SA and BB recorded another1201

magnetic signal of normal polarity only, carried by1202

multi-domain magnetite grains. This is the only tim-1203

ing constraint of the rotation of BB (contrary to the1204

earlier TRM interpretation).1205

4. Finally, the Ceuta peridotites rotated anticlockwise1206

by 19.7 ± 5.9° about a vertical axis. It is noteworthy1207

that this rotation was (1) much smaller than the rota-1208

tions found in Beni Bousera and Ronda (see sections1209

1.3) and (2) have taken place at a later stage than1210

those at the other sites (if one assumes that stage1211

three is roughly coeval for the three bodies).1212

The new palaeomagnetic data of the Ceuta and the Beni1213

Bousera peridotites that have been found in this study1214

are constraints that need to be incorporated in any geody-1215

namic model of the evolution of the Betic-Rifean mountain1216

belt.1217

9. Acknowledgments1218

We are thankful for the nancial support from the1219

Spanish projects PR27/05-13936-BSCH, CGL2009-10840,1220

CGL2011-29474-C02-01 and CGL2012-38481. VCRM is1221

especially grateful to his colleagues D. García, F.J. Pavón,1222

G. McIntosh, V. Villasante and I. Palencia for their geolog-1223

ical guidance and assistance during eldwork. We would1224

also like to express our gratitude to A. Crespo Blanc and1225

M. Maone, whose various comments have greatly im-1226

proved this work.1227

Ari, A., Gueydan, F., Pitra, P., Essai, A., Précigout, J., 2011.1228

Oligo-miocene exhumation of the beni-bousera peridotite through1229

a lithosphere-scale extensional shear zone. Geodinamica Acta1230

24 (1), 4960.1231

Allerton, S., Lonergan, L., Platt, J., Platzman, E., McClelland, E.,1232

1993. Palaeomagnetic rotations in the eastern betic cordillera,1233

southern spain. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 119 (3), 2251234

241.1235

Andrieux, J., Fontbote, J.-M., Mattauer, M., 1971. Sur un modèle1236

explicatif de l'arc de gibraltar. Earth and Planetary Science Let-1237

ters 12 (2), 191198.1238

Balanyá, J., García-Dueñas, V., 1987. Les directions structurales1239

dans le domaine d'alborán de part et d'autre du détroit de gibral-1240

tar. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences. Série 2, Mé-1241

canique, Physique, Chimie, Sciences de l'univers, Sciences de la1242

Terre 304 (15), 929932.1243

31

Page 33 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Barberá, X., Cabrera, L., Gomis, E., Parés, J., 1996. Determinación1244

del polo paleomagnético para el límite oligoceno-mioceno en la1245

cuenca del ebro. Geogaceta 20 (5), 10141016.1246

Calvo, M., Cuevas, J., Tuba, J., 2001. Preliminary palaeomag-1247

netic results on oligoceneearly miocene mac dykes from south-1248

ern spain. Tectonophysics 332 (3), 333345.1249

Calvo, M., Osete, M. L., Vegas, R., 1994. Palaeomagnetic rotations in1250

opposite senses in southeastern spain. Geophysical research letters1251

21 (9), 761764.1252

Calvo, M., Vegas, R., Osete, M. L., 1997. Palaeomagnetic results1253

from upper miocene and pliocene rocks from the internal zone1254

of the eastern betic cordilleras (southern spain). Tectonophysics1255

277 (4), 271283.1256

Chalouan, A., Michard, A., 2004. The alpine rif belt (morocco): a1257

case of mountain building in a subduction-subduction-transform1258

fault triple junction. Pure and applied Geophysics 161 (3), 4891259

519.1260

Chalouan, A., Michard, A., El Kadiri, K., Negro, F., Frizon de Lam-1261

otte, D., J.I., S., Saddiqi, O., 2008. The rif belt. In: Michard, A.,1262

Saddiqi, O., Chalouan, A., de Lamotte, D. F. (Eds.), Continen-1263

tal Evolution: The Geology of Morocco: Structure, Stratigraphy,1264

and Tectonics of the Africa-Atlantic-Mediterranean Triple Junc-1265

tion. Springer.1266

Cifelli, F., Mattei, M., Porreca, M., 2008. New paleomagnetic data1267

from oligoceneupper miocene sediments in the rif chain (northern1268

morocco): Insights on the neogene tectonic evolution of the gibral-1269

tar arc. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (19782012)1270

113 (B2).1271

Day, R., Fuller, M., Schmidt, V., 1977. Hysteresis properties1272

of titanomagnetites: grain-size and compositional dependence.1273

Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 13 (4), 260267.1274

Deenen, M. H., Langereis, C. G., van Hinsbergen, D. J., Biggin, A. J.,1275

2011. Geomagnetic secular variation and the statistics of palaeo-1276

magnetic directions. Geophysical Journal International 186 (2),1277

509520.1278

Demarest, H. H., 1983. Error analysis for the determination of tec-1279

tonic rotation from paleomagnetic data. Journal of Geophysical1280

Research: Solid Earth (19782012) 88 (B5), 43214328.1281

Dunlop, D., Özdemir, Ö., 1997. Rock Magnetism: Fundamentals and1282

Frontiers. Cambridge Studies in Magnetism. Cambridge Univer-1283

sity Press.1284

Dunlop, D., Özdemir, O., 2009. Magnetizations in rocks and miner-1285

als. In: Kono, M. (Ed.), Geomagnetism: treatise on geophysics.1286

Dunlop, D. J., 2002a. Theory and application of the day plot (mrs/ms1287

versus hcr/hc) 1. theoretical curves and tests using titanomag-1288

netite data. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (B3), 2056.1289

Dunlop, D. J., 2002b. Theory and application of the day plot1290

(mrs/ms versus hcr/hc) 2. application to data for rocks, sedi-1291

ments, and soils. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth1292

(19782012) 107 (B3), EPM5.1293

Feinberg, H., Saddiqi, O., Michard, A., 1996. New constraints on the1294

bending of the gibraltar arc from palaeomagnetism of the ronda1295

peridotites (betic cordilleras, spain). Geological Society, London,1296

Special Publications 105 (1), 4352.1297

Fisher, R., 1953. Dispersion on a sphere. Proceedings of the Royal1298

Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences1299

217 (1130), 295305.1300

Frizon de Lamotte, D., Andrieux, J., Guezou, J.-C., 1991. Cinema-1301

tique des chevauchements neogenes dans l'arc betico-rifain; dis-1302

cussion sur les modeles geodynamiques. Bulletin de la Société1303

géologique de France 162 (4), 611626.1304

Gysi, A. P., Jagoutz, O., Schmidt, M. W., Targuisti, K., 2011. Pet-1305

rogenesis of pyroxenites and melt inltrations in the ultramac1306

complex of beni bousera, northern morocco. Journal of Petrology1307

52 (9), 16791735.1308

Halls, H. C., 1976. A least-squares method to nd a remanence direc-1309

tion from converging remagnetization circles. Geophysical Journal1310

of the Royal Astronomical Society 45 (2), 297304.1311

URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1976.tb00327.x1312

Jasonov, P., Nourgaliev, D., Burov, B., Heller, F., 1998. A modern-1313

ized coercivity spectrometer. Geol. Carpathica 49, 224226.1314

Kirschvink, J., 1980. The least-squares line and plane and the anal-1315

ysis of palaeomagnetic data. Geophysical Journal International1316

62 (3), 699718.1317

Kornprobst, J., 1969. Le massif ultrabasique de beni bousera (rif1318

interne, maroc): Étude des péridotites de haute température et1319

de haute pression, et des pyroxénolites, à grenat ou sans grenat,1320

qui leur sont associées. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology1321

23, 283322.1322

Krijgsman, W., Garces, M., 2004. Palaeomagnetic constraints on the1323

geodynamic evolution of the gibraltar arc. Terra Nova 16 (5), 2811324

287.1325

Lonergan, L., White, N., 1997. Origin of the betic-rif mountain belt.1326

Tectonics 16 (3), 504522.1327

Loomis, T., 1975. Tertiary mantle diapirism, orogeny and plate tec-1328

tonics east of the strait of gibraltar. Am. J. Sci. 275 (1), 130.1329

Maone, M., Morris, A., Plümper, O., van Hinsbergen, D. J., 2014.1330

Magnetic properties of variably serpentinized peridotites and their1331

implication for the evolution of oceanic core complexes. Geochem-1332

istry, Geophysics, Geosystems.1333

Martin-Hernandez, F., Ferre, E., Belley, F., Ruiz-Martinez, V., Gar-1334

rido, C., Osete, M., 2009. Magnetic signature and fabric of serpen-1335

tinized mantle rocks in the betic-rif arc and tectonic implications.1336

In: AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. Vol. 1. p. 04.1337

Mattei, M., Cifelli, F., Rojas, I. M., Crespo Blanc, A., Comas, M.,1338

Faccenna, C., Porreca, M., 2006. Neogene tectonic evolution of1339

32

Page 34 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

the gibraltar arc: New paleomagnetic constrains from the betic1340

chain. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 250 (3), 522540.1341

McFadden, P., McElhinny, M., 1990. Classication of the rever-1342

sal test in palaeomagnetism. Geophysical Journal International1343

103 (3), 725729.1344

Michard, A., Chalouan, A., Feinberg, H., Goé, B., Montigny, R.,1345

2002. How does the alpine belt end between spain and morocco?1346

Bulletin de la Société géologique de France 173 (1), 315.1347

Michard, A., Chalouan, A., Montigny, R., Ouazzani-Touhami, M.,1348

1983. Les nappes cristallophylliennes du rif (sebtides, maroc), té-1349

moins d'un édice alpin de type pennique incluant le manteau1350

supérieur. CR Acad. Sci., Ser. II 296, 13371340.1351

Michard, A., Goe, B., Bouybaouene, M., Saddiqi, O., 1997. Late1352

hercynianmesozoic thinning in the alboran domain: metamor-1353

phic data from the northern rif, morocco. Terra Nova 9 (4), 1711354

174.1355

Monié, P., Galindo-Zaldivar, J., Loderio, F., Goe, B., Jabaloy, A.,1356

1991. 40ar/39ar geochronology of alpine tectonism in the betic1357

cordilleras (southern spain). Journal of the Geological Society1358

148 (2), 289297.1359

Najid, D., Westphal, M., Hernandez, J., 1981. Paleomagnetism of1360

quaternary and miocene lavas from north-east and central mo-1361

rocco. J. Geophys 49, 149152.1362

Osete, M., Freeman, R., Vegas, R., 1988. Preliminary palaeomagnetic1363

results from the subbetic zone (betic cordillera, southern spain):1364

kinematic and structural implications. Physics of the earth and1365

planetary interiors 52 (3), 283300.1366

Osete, M., Freeman, R., Vegas, R., 1989. Palaeomagnetic evidence1367

for block rotations and distributed deformation of the iberian-1368

african plate boundary. In: Paleomagnetic rotations and conti-1369

nental deformation. Springer, pp. 381391.1370

Osete, M., Villalaín, J., Palencia, A., Osete, C., Sandoval, J.,1371

DUENas, V. G., 2004. New palaeomagnetic data from the betic1372

cordillera: constraints on the timing and the geographical distri-1373

bution of tectonic rotations in southern spain. In: Geodynamics1374

of Azores-Tunisia. Springer, pp. 701722.1375

Platt, J., Vissers, R., 1989. Extensional collapse of thickened conti-1376

nental lithosphere: A working hypothesis for the alboran sea and1377

gibraltar arc. Geology 17 (6), 540543.1378

Platt, J. P., Behr, W. M., Johanesen, K., Williams, J. R., 2013. The1379

betic-rif arc and its orogenic hinterland: A review. Annual Review1380

of Earth and Planetary Sciences 41, 313357.1381

Platzman, E., 1992. Paleomagnetic rotations and the kinematics of1382

the gibraltar arc. Geology 20 (4), 311314.1383

Platzman, E., Lowrie, W., 1992. Paleomagnetic evidence for rotation1384

of the iberian peninsula and the external betic cordillera, southern1385

spain. Earth and planetary science letters 108 (1), 4560.1386

Platzman, E., Platt, J., Olivier, P., 1993. Palaeomagnetic rotations1387

and fault kinematics in the rif arc of morocco. Journal of the1388

Geological Society 150 (4), 707718.1389

Reuber, I., Michard, A., Chalouan, A., Juteau, T., Jermoumi, B.,1390

1982. Structure and emplacement of the alpine-type peridotites1391

from beni bousera, rif, morocco: a polyphase tectonic interpreta-1392

tion. Tectonophysics 82 (3), 231251.1393

Rochette, P., Fillion, G., Mattéi, J.-L., Dekkers, M. J., 1990. Mag-1394

netic transition at 3034 kelvin in pyrrhotite: insight into a1395

widespread occurrence of this mineral in rocks. Earth and Plane-1396

tary Science Letters 98 (3), 319328.1397

Saddiqi, O., Feinberg, H., El Azzab, D., Michard, A., 1995. Paléo-1398

magnétisme des péridotites des beni bousera (rif interne, maroc):1399

conséquences pour l'évolution miocène de l'arc de gibraltar. C. R.1400

Acad. Sci. 321, 361368.1401

Sánchez-Gómez, M., Dueñas, V. G., Muñoz, M., Balanyá, J. C.,1402

1995. Relación estructural entre los cuerpos peridotíticos situados1403

al norte y al sur del estrecho de gibraltar. Geogaceta 17 (17),1404

135137.1405

Sánchez-Rodríguez, L., Gebauer, D., 2000. Mesozoic formation of1406

pyroxenites and gabbros in the ronda area (southern spain), fol-1407

lowed by early miocene subduction metamorphism and emplace-1408

ment into the middle crust: Upb sensitive high-resolution ion1409

microprobe dating of zircon. Tectonophysics 316 (1), 1944.1410

Seidemann, D. E., 1976. An 40ar/39ar age spectrum for a cordierite-1411

bearing rock: Isolating the eects of excess radiogenic 40ar. Earth1412

and Planetary Science Letters 33 (2), 268272.1413

Torsvik, T. H., Van der Voo, R., Preeden, U., Mac Niocaill, C., Stein-1414

berger, B., Doubrovine, P. V., van Hinsbergen, D. J., Domeier,1415

M., Gaina, C., Tohver, E., et al., 2012. Phanerozoic polar wander,1416

palaeogeography and dynamics. Earth-Science Reviews.1417

Villalaín, J., Osete, M., Vegas, R., García-Dueñas, V., Heller, F.,1418

1994. Widespread neogene remagnetization in jurassic limestones1419

of the south-iberian palaeomargin (western betics, gibraltar arc).1420

Physics of the earth and planetary interiors 85 (1), 1533.1421

Villalaín, J., Osete, M., Vegas, R., García-Dueñas, V., Heller, F.,1422

1996. The neogene remagnetization in the western betics: a brief1423

comment on the reliability of palaeomagnetic directions. Geologi-1424

cal Society, London, Special Publications 105 (1), 3341.1425

Villasante-Marcos, V., Osete, M., Gervilla, F., Garca-Duenas,1426

V., 2003. Palaeomagnetic study of the ronda peridotites (betic1427

cordillera, southern spain). Tectonophysics 377 (1), 119141.1428

Zeck, H. P., Monié, P., Villa, I. M., Hansen, B. T., 1992. Very high1429

rates of cooling and uplift in the alpine belt of the betic cordilleras,1430

southern spain. Geology 20 (1), 7982.1431

10. Appendix1432

33

Page 35 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Position Sample Fe Mg Si O Ni Al S Cr Co Ca Cu Ti Mn Cl

1 BB5-6B 9.8 11.3 1.3 41.9 19.8 15.8 0.2

2 BB5-6B 5.8 11.6 47.3 22.8 12.5

3 BB5-6B 1.1 15.8 6.4 24.5 0.3 3.3 48.7

4 BB5-6B 32.1 20.9 47.0

5 BB5-6B 3.7 23.2 16.2 54.6 0.9 1.5

6 BB5-6B 46.0 2.4 2.1 49.7

7 BB5-6B 52.0 0.6 47.4

8 BB5-6B 6.1 11.6 47.5 24.5 10.4

9 BB5-6B 37.4 2.5 47.2 0.3 0.9 11.6

10 BB4-2B 2.1 24.8 17.9 53.0 2.3

11 BB4-2B 8.3 22.7 11.4 45.9 4.7 2.1 5.0

12 BB4-2B 4.8 24.8 13.2 49.9 6.8 0.2 0.4

13 SA2-3A 24.3 12.6 11.6 3.5 35.5 12.5

14 SA2-3A 27.8 25.7 46.5

15 SA2-3A 8.4 50.2 41.4 * ** 0.0

16 SA2-3A 5.8 44.3 49.3 * 0.6 **

17 SA2-3A 26.1 0.7 0.5 27.5 45.3

18 SA2-3A 26.3 28.2 45.5

19 SA2-3A 94.4 1.2 1.8 ? 2.6 **

20 SA2-3A 82.8 6.6 4.1 ? 6.5 **

21 SA2-3A 55.3 25.9 18.3 * 0.5

22 SA2-3A 46.1 2.0 1.2 47.9 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.4

23 SA2-3A 24.9 0.5 27.6 47.0

24 SA2-3A 30.2 8.2 0.5 43.7 14.3 3.1

25 SA8-3A 36.5 5.0 2.6 47.7 4.2 3.3 0.7

26 SA8-3A 13.0 0.6 0.8 31.5 53.6 0.4

27 SA8-3A 17.5 9.1 9.7 43.0 3.5 14.1 1.6 1.6

28 SA8-3A 34.0 9.7 6.1 50.2

29 SA8-3A 7.6 18.1 11.7 37.5 9.1 16.1

30 SA8-3A 54.0 0.7 45.3

Table 8: Atomic percentages of the elements from the EDX analyses of the SA samples. *: Oxygen present but the amount has not been

calculated; **: Small amount is possibly present but has not been calculated; ?: Presence or absence of oxygen unknown.

34

Page 36 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

Position Sample Grain size Major elements Mineral

1 BB5-6B 10 µm Fe, Mg, O, Al, Cr Chromitea

2 BB5-6B 500 µm Fe, Mg, O, Al, Cr Chromitea

3 BB5-6B 10 µm Cu, Mg, O CuO + ...

4 BB5-6B 50 µm Fe, Ni, S Pentlandite

5 BB5-6B < 1 µm Mg, Si, O Forsterite

6 BB5-6B 10 µm Fe, O Magnetite

7 BB5-6B 10 µm Fe, O Wüstite

8 BB5-6B 50 µm Al, Mg, O, Cr Pyroxene/Chromite

9 BB5-6B 5 µm Fe, O, Cr Magnetite/Chromite

10 BB4-2B 10 µm Mg, Si, O Forsterite

11 BB4-2B 1 µm Mg, Si, O Forsterite

12 BB4-2B 1 µm Mg, Si, O Forsterite

13 SA2-3A 100 µm Fe, Ni, S, Cu, O Pentlandite + CuO

14 SA2-3A 50 µm Fe, Ni, S Pentlandite

15 SA2-3A 100 µm Fe, Mg, Si, O* Pyroxene/Olivine

16 SA2-3A matrix Mg, Si, O* Pyroxene/Olivine

17 SA2-3A 10 µm Fe, Ni, S Pentlandite

18 SA2-3A 10 µm Fe, Ni, S Pentlandite

19 SA2-3A 10 µm Fe, O* Magnetite/Hematite

20 SA2-3A 10 µm Fe, O* Magnetite/Hematite

21 SA2-3A 10 µm Fe, Mg, Si, O* Olivineb

22 SA2-3A 5 µm Fe, O Wüstite

23 SA2-3A 10 µm Fe, Ni, S Pentlandite

24 SA2-3A 10 µm Fe, O, Al Magnetite/Hematitea

25 SA8-3A 10 µm Fe, O Magnetite/Hematite

26 SA8-3A 10 µm Fe, Ni, S Pentlandite

27 SA8-3A 10 µm Fe, Mg, Si, O, Cr Fayalitec

28 SA8-3A 5 µm Fe, Mg, Si, O Magnetite/Hematite

29 SA8-3A 1 µm Fe, Mg, Si, O, Ni, S Pentlandite

30 SA8-3A 50 µm Fe, O Wüstite

Table 9: Overview of the minerals that have been analysed with their possible identication. *: see note of Tab. 8, a: Contains substantial

amounts of Al, b: Contains substantial amounts of Fe, c: Contains substantial amounts of Cr.

35

Page 37 of 37

Accep

ted

Man

uscr

ipt

N

(a) BB

N

(b) SA

Figure 19: Magnetic directions below 180°C (BB) and 100°C (SA). Mean directions and α95 condence levels are indicated.

36