NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Emergency Notification for People with Disabilities Donna Platt, Accessibility Committee

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Emergency Notification for People with Disabilities Donna Platt, Accessibility Committee Co-Chair Richard Ray, Accessibility Committee Co-Chair Mark Fletcher, Emergency Notification for People with Disabilities Work Group Co-Chair October 6, 2014
  • Slide 2
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Types of Information Disseminated Alert Notification service Information Posted for public view Live Assistance Live contact for information or assistance
  • Slide 3
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Speak English Please What protocols for sending simple, easily understood messages should be established?
  • Slide 4
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Which modalities are available or in progress to send out alerts beside TV and radio? Which modalities are considered accessibility for people with hearing loss? What kind of challenges does EAS have in terms of providing messages to people who are deaf, deaf-blind and hard of hearing? How can a user select what is best for them?
  • Slide 5
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida How Should It Look? What are best practices for formatting emergency information? What should the look and feel of the message be to best communicate the urgency and required action? What requirements should the website include in providing accessibility to people with disabilities?
  • Slide 6
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida How Much Information? What are the best practices for complete messages that refer to other sources for supplemental information? What type of supplemental information should be considered if the original message is "complete"? Should the completion indicator be replaced with an expiry date / time? Should there be a national standard or should each agency establish their own expiry dates?
  • Slide 7
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Timing on the Delivery? Policy on timeline frame for sending alerts Identify steps needed to make information about resources disseminated by cooperating agencies accessible to people with disabilities
  • Slide 8
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Mandatory Testing What protocols should be established for testing different modes? How often shall they be tested? Should we just test the mode, or the operator implementing the mode?
  • Slide 9
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Alternative Communications Identify alternatives for contacting N-1-1 (2-1-1, 3-1-1, 5-1-1) beside voice and TTY What type of accessibility to provide supplemental information on websites for those using computers as well as mobile devices? What requirement for brevity is expected in sending out alerts/information? Electronic Printed
  • Slide 10
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Power Outage & Congestion What options are available for people who are deaf, deaf-blind and hard of hearing to receive alerts and information? How can we avoid sending links to information on smart phones especially during power/internet outage or congestion?
  • Slide 11
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Best Title for Information Document? Emergency Notification Services for People with Disabilities OR Emergency Communication Services for People with Disabilities
  • Slide 12
  • NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Contact Information Jim House [email protected] Mark J. Fletcher, ENP [email protected]