Upload
trankhanh
View
271
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Wärtsilä .
LIQUID NATURAL GAS (LNG)VS.
LIQUID BIO GAS (LBG)
Vaasa EnergyWeek 14.3.2016
Kenneth EngblomDirector , Business DevelopmentLNG InfrastructureWärtsila
3/14/2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom1
© Wärtsilä .
AGENDA
AGENDA
WÄRTSILÄ AT A GLANCELNGLBGLNG VS LBGCONCLUSION
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
Wärtsilä is a world leader in large diesel and gas engines for power plants and ships.
The technology is also prepared for renewable fuel in gas or liquid form.
When will renewable fuel be the number one choice, how to make Liquid Bio Gas (LBG) the
real alternative to Liquid Natural Gas (LNG)?
© Wärtsilä .
WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION
EFFICIENCY FLEXIBILITY ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
LE
AD
ER
IN
SOLUTIONS FOR
Marine/
Offshore
Power
Generation
Marine
Solutions
34%
Energy
Solutions
22%
Services
43%
Listed in Helsinki
5,0 billion €
turnover
Net sales
by business
2015
18,900 Professionals
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
WÄRTSILÄ LNG SOLUTIONS
ON
SH
OR
EO
FF
SH
OR
EL
IFE
CY
CL
E
Small LNG liquefaction plants Mini LNG liquefaction &
Bio Gas liquefaction plantsSmall/Medium LNG terminals
LNG satellite & bunkering
terminalsLNG storage & regasification
barge
LNG regasification BOG reliquefaction Cargo Handling System
Gas and LNG Carriers
Fuel gas handling system Ship and Cargo Tank design
Lifecycle services Start–up supportProduct and technical support Spares
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
AGENDA
WÄRTSILÄ AT A GLANCE
LNG (Liquid Natural Gas)
LBG (Liquid Bio Gas)
LNG vs. LBG
CONCLUSION
© Wärtsilä .
NATURAL GAS AS LNG IS CONQUERING NEW MARKETS
By 2035 LNG will have overtaken pipelines as the dominant form of traded gas – BP Energy Outlook 2035
Global interest in LNG is driven by
• Energy security and lower energy costs
• Sustainability and emission reduction
in power generation and shipping
• Perfect balancing fuel for intermittent
renewable power generation and
escalating demand fluctuation.
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
LNG CONSUMERS
Typical consumers:
• Power generation
• Baseload & peaking power plants
• Energy intensive industries
• Mines & Drilling rigs
• Metal processing plants
• Petrochemical plants
• Manufacturing plants, e.g. fertilizer, cement, gypsum boards, glass, chemicals
• Gas driven transportation
• Ships
• Trucks
• Domestic gas consumption
• Cooking & heating
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
NATURAL GAS - RESOURCES
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
LARGE SCALE LNG- HOW IT USED TO BE!
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
SMALL SCALE LNG- THE FUTURE ADITION!
VAASA
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
”Providing the only source of gas for industries in Northern Finland.”
TORNIO- FINLAND
Tornio Manga LNGCustomer Manga LNG Oy
Type Small/Mid scale terminal
Tank net volume 50,000 m3
Send out Max 40 tonnes per hour at 6.0 barg
Scope of supply • Civil works and infrastructure
• Full containment storage tank
• Regasification & gas metering
• BOG system
• Electrical and control system
• Unloading system
• Bunkering and Truck loading
Delivery method EPC Turnkey
Delivered 2018
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
“The first stand-alone small scale LNG plant in Northern Europe.”
KARMØY, NORWAY
SnurrevardenCustomer Gasnor
Type Small scale liquefaction plant
Tank net volume 2 x 250 m3
Capacity 60 TPD / 22,000 TPA
Size of
liquefaction unit
16 m x 18 m
Gas source Pipeline gas. Inlet pressure
120-150 bar.
Details • LNG transported to customers by
tanker truck
Scope
of supply
Complete plant, incl.
• Gas pre-treatment
• Cooling system (Ambient air)
• Reversed Brayton liquefaction
process
• Storage tanks
• Electrical and control systems
• Truck loading system
• Gas engine
Excl. Substructures
Delivery method EPCIC
Delivered 2003
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
“Twice the capacity,half the footprint!”
BERGEN, NORWAY
Kollsnes IICustomer Gasnor
Type Small scale liquefaction plant
Tank net volume 4,000 m3
Capacity 230 TPD / 84,000 TPA
Size of
liquefaction unit
12 m x 38 m
Gas source Pipeline gas. Inlet pressure typically
70 bar.
Details Extension to Kollsnes I. Includes two
truck loading stations and existing
loading jetty for small LNG carriers.
Scope
of supply
Complete plant, incl.
• Gas pre-treatment
• Cooling system (Seawater)
• Double Reversed Brayton
liquefaction process
• Storage tank
• Electrical and control systems
• Civil works
Delivery method EPCIC
Delivered 2007
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
PORVOO, FINLAND
“LIN consumption reduced by 60% compared to old liquefaction plant.”
Gasum KilpilahtiCustomer Gasum
Type Mini liquefaction plant
Tank net volume 3 x 683 m3
Capacity 55 TPD / 20,000 TPA
Size of
liquefaction unit
16 m x 20 m
Gas source Pipeline gas
Details • Utilization of excess nitrogen
from adjacent oxygen plant.
• No rotating machinery
Scope
of supply
• Pre-treatment
• LIN liquefaction process
• Storage tanks
Excl. substructures
Delivery method EPCIC
Delivered 2010
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
OSLO, NORWAY
“135 Oslo region buses will be able to run on biogas which means 10,000 tonnes emission reduction per year.”
EGE BiogasCustomer Cambi AS
Type Mini liquefaction plant
Tank net volume 180 m3
Capacity 11 TPD / 4,000 TPA
Size of
liquefaction unit
8 m x 14 m
Gas source Biogas from 50,000 TPA of food
waste
Details Fuel production for 135 buses in
the city of Oslo
Scope
of supply
Complete plant, incl.
• Gas pre-treatment
• Cooling system (Ambient air)
• MR liquefaction process
• Storage tank
• Electrical and control systems
• Service agreement
Excl. Civil works and installation
Delivery method EPC
Delivered 2013
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
EGE BIOGAS- OSLO, NORWAY
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
AGENDA
WÄRTSILÄ AT A GLANCE
LNG (Liquid Natural Gas)
LBG (Liquid Bio Gas)
LNG vs. LBG
CONCLUSION
© Wärtsilä .
BIO GAS - FEEDSTOCK
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
BIO GAS – ANNUAL POTENTIAL
Finland total energy
consumption:
380 000 GWh
Botnia region:(Västerbotten, Västernorrland, Ostrobothnia)
Potential: >1200 GWh
In use: >180 GWh( 12 plants )
Finland*:Potential: 7 - 17000 GWh
In use: >900 GWh (>82 plants)
End use: 455 GWh Heat
160 GWh El
35 GWh Fuel
740 000 GWh
Source : Johan Saarela, Stormossen , Ari Lampinen http://www.cbg100.net/products/finnish-biogas-statistics-2013-2014/ & European BioGas Association
* Based on assumptions from 2013
EU :Potential: 740 000 GWh
In Use: 133 000 GWh (>18000 plants)
Of which
BioMethane: 24 000 GWh Fuel
(367 plants)
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
BIO GAS PLANTS NEARBY
Stormossen
Gas Output: 16 GWh (=1,8MW)
Jeppo BiogasGas production: ~ 21 GWh / a ( =2,4 MW)
Lakeuden Etappi
Gas production: ~16 GWh / a (= 1,8 MW)
Laihia Biogas
Gas production: >2 GWh / a ( = 0,2 MW)
Total Capacity within 100km radius
55 GWh (6.2 MW)
Under planning!
Biovakka, Lapua52 GWh (=6 MW)
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
Honkajoki Biogas
Gas production: >36 GWh / a ( = 4 MW)
© Wärtsilä .
AGENDA
WÄRTSILÄ AT A GLANCE
LNG (Liquid Natural Gas)
LBG (Liquid Bio Gas)
LNG vs. LBG
CONCLUSION
© Wärtsilä .
LOW OIL PRICE - THE COMMON CHALLENGE FOR LNG AND LBG
Light Fuel Oil
LNG
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
INCREASING THE VALUE OF BIOGAS
Investment:
+9M€
3 M€
+5 M€
50GWh/year
Bio Gas plant.
Raw material
processing
Gasification or
Anaerobic digestion
Gas Upgrading
Compression (CBG)
Liquefaction
(LBG)
or
+1,5 M€
+5 M€
Value of Biogas
n.a
Flare: 0 M€
Heat: 5- 15 €/MWh
El: 38% of 30-35 €/MWh (With Feed in 83,5€ / MWh) 12€/MWh or 32€/MWh
or
Same as above, slightly better el. efficiency
CNG: 1,25€/kg- Without ALV 1,01€/kg – Duty (0,21€/kg) = 0,80 €/ kg = 59€ / MWh
CBG: 1,45€/kg - Without ALV 1,17€/kg = 86€ / MWh
LBG >>86 €/MWh
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
LBG PLANT INVESTMENT AND PRODUCTION COST
GWh / Year
Inve
stm
en
t (M
€)
& P
rod
uc
tio
n C
os
t (€
/MW
h)
0 4010 20 30 Tonne LBG / day
0 8000020000 6000040000 m3 raw gas / day
0205 1510 MW (gas energy)
ASSUMPTIONS: 30 % Investment support, 6,5% WACC, Feedstock delivered free of charge to plant, approx. 1/3 of Income from digestate
Ideal size for LBG Production
30- 130 GWh Plant Size
Plant Size
CBG (ALV0%) Sales
price in Finland
Typical max size for
Biomass collection &
distrubution of digetsate
Recommended
size by ELY
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
Wärtsilä
Large LBG
Wärtsilä
Small LBG
© Wärtsilä .
FUEL - SALES PRICE AND COSTS
GWh / Year
Inve
stm
en
t (M
€)
& P
rod
uc
tio
n C
os
t (€
/MW
h)
0 4010 20 30 Tonne LBG / day
0 8000020000 6000040000 m3 raw gas / day
0205 1510 MW (gas energy)
Natural Gas
Plant Size
CBG = 1,17 €/kg (with ALV 24% = 1.45 €/kg)Diesel
Ta
x
LFO(Polltoöljy)
Ta
xLogistics
Profit
CBG conv.
Ta
x
Gasoline
Ta
x
CNG
All prices without value added tax (ALV 0%)
LNG – Estimated landed price in FinlandHandling fee Handling fee
Handling fee
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
FUEL - SALES PRICE AND COSTS
GWh / Year
Inve
stm
en
t (M
€)
& P
rod
uc
tio
n C
os
t (€
/MW
h)
0 4010 20 30 Tonne LBG / day
0 8000020000 6000040000 m3 raw gas / day
0205 1510 MW (gas energy)
Natural Gas
Plant Size
CBG = 1,17 €/kg (with ALV 24% = 1.45 €/kg)Diesel
Ta
x
LFO(Polltoöljy)
Ta
xLogistics
Profit
CBG conv.
Ta
x
Gasoline
Ta
x
CNG
All prices without value added tax (ALV 0%)
LNG – Estimated landed price in FinlandHandling fee Handling fee
Handling fee
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
AGENDA
WÄRTSILÄ AT A GLANCE
LNG (Liquid Natural Gas)
LBG (Liquid Bio Gas)
LNG vs. LBG
CONCLUSION
© Wärtsilä .
LNG VS. LBG IN FINLAND
Today Natural Gas (and soon LNG) can be imported for a
fraction of the cost of domestic CBG or LBG production.
So why LBG ?
• Create jobs & potential new income for farmers
• Reduces fuel import
• Almost CO2 neutral
• The most efficient & environmental friendly biofuel
• Energy storage & potential off-taker for wind methane
Synergies between LNG and LBG
• LNG = LBG
• Building LNG infra will enable LBG production & consumption
• Both utilizing same infrastructure and consumers (Trucks, Marine
sector, Industry & Power plants)
• LNG is back-up to LBG and CBG/CNG
• LNG + LBG is a the ultimate low CO2 fuel mix.
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
© Wärtsilä .
MAKING LBG MORE FEASIBLE
How to make LBG feasible?
LBG could be produced for < 60€/MWh with:
• Larger plants, > 40 GWh / year
• Co-operation/ Pipelines between neighboring bio gas plants
• Easier permitting of larger plant
• Finding valuable use for the digestate
• Choosing locations close to major agricultural and industrial waste
• Financial support for the biogas upgrading & liquefaction
• Further R&D to make small scale liquefaction plants more feasible
• Preparing the infrastructure & consumers for LNG, thereby enabling LBG
14.03.2016 Vaasa Energy Week- LNG vs. LBG / Kenneth Engblom
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING !
Please visit us at Wartsila.com or Energy Week -Stand B5