29
NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute This Workshop Still Available: Qualitative Research Methods August 11-22 10am-2pm School of Education Bld. Room 216 Attendees will learn to apply various methods of qualitative inquiry, including ethnographic, structured and semi-structured interviewing, focus groups, document and content analysis, narrative inquiry, phenomenological studies, case study, observation, historical research, and action research. Instructor: Dr. Dawn Williams, Chair of Department of Educational Administration and Policy. You must apply separately for this workshop. NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

  • Upload
    warner

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute. NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute. This Workshop Still Available: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

This Workshop Still Available:

Qualitative Research Methods August 11-22 10am-2pmSchool of Education Bld. Room 216 Attendees will learn to apply various methods of qualitative inquiry, including ethnographic, structured and semi-structured interviewing, focus groups, document and content analysis, narrative inquiry, phenomenological studies, case study, observation, historical research, and action research.

Instructor: Dr. Dawn Williams, Chair of Department of Educational Administration and Policy.

You must apply separately for this workshop.

More information is available at www.HowardSEI.org.

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Page 2: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Quantitative Methodsfor the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Dr. Jamie BardenDepartment of [email protected]

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation InstituteNAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Page 3: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Social and Behavioral Sciences

:study systematic processes of human behavior.

Level of Analysiswithin individual: neuroscience, brain biology individual: psychology, behavioral genetics social structure: economics, anthropology,

sociology, political science, public health

Page 4: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

“People like it when they understand something that they previously thought they couldn't understand. It's a sense of empowerment.”

--Neil DeGrasse Tyson, 2008

Page 5: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

“What is the principal of science?The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific 'truth'.”

“What business are you in as a scientist? There is an expanding frontier of ignorance...”

-- Richard Feynman (1964)

Page 6: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Why use the scientific method?

To understand relationships between variables in our social world.

Empirically test predictions. (birds of a feather/opposites attract)

To allow others to independently verify findings.

Page 7: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

HypothesisOperationalizeMeasureEvaluateRevise or Replicate

Page 8: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Hypothesis: an explicit, testable prediction about the

conditions under which an event will occur.

Useful hypotheses should be 1. a priori: before data collection2. falsifiable: could be found false

Page 9: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Hypothesis

Where do hypotheses come from?

Segue to Inspiration

Has your hypothesis been explored already?

Segue to Literature Review

Page 10: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Operationalize Conceptual variable: The general abstract

definition of a variable. (like a dictionary definition)

Operational definition: The specific procedures for manipulating or measuring a conceptual variable. (concrete application)

Page 11: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Hypothesis (conceptual)similar people will be more attracted to each other

Hypothesis (operational)

personality test choice of interaction partnerheight, age attraction questionnaire

Construct Validity: How well measures and manipulations reflect the variables they are intended to measure and manipulate.

Page 12: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

1. distancing behavior2. questionnaire items3. facial expression4. skin conductance

Example

Fear

Operational (concrete measures and manipulations)

Conceptual (dictionary)

Variables

Pick One of Your Variables

Feeling scared or a behavioral tendency to distance the self from a stimuli

Page 13: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Methodological Options: Social and Behavioral Sciences

Data Collection Approaches1. Life Record Data2. Field Study3. Survey Research4. Laboratory Research5. Case Study6. Focus Group7. Modeling

Types of StudyA. DescriptiveB. CorrelationalC. Experimental

Which have you used?

Page 14: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

MeasureThree types of studies:

1. Descriptive: What is the level of 1 variable? Ex: What is the president’s overall approval rating?

2. Correlational: How are 2 variables related?Ex: How does survey respondent’s age relate to approval rating? [Predictor is measured]

3. Experimental: Does one variable cause the other?Ex: Does dark vs. light skin in Barack Obama’s

photos influence approval rating?[The independent variable is manipulated]

Page 15: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: Descriptive Descriptive Research: describes people using

the level of a single variable (a thought, feeling or behavior).

Types:1. Observation2. Historical records (archives)3. Survey questionnaires

Examples?

Page 16: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Descriptive Research Example

Gallup Daily Poll

Page 17: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Population Sample

Measure: Descriptive Random Sampling: Selecting participants to be in

a study so that everyone in the population has an equal chance of being in the study.

A random sample (N=1000) allows us to generalize our findings back to THIS population.

Estimate of Population (mean +/- %)

Page 18: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: Descriptive

Advantage: easy to do

Disadvantage: only involves 1 variable, so no information about relationships between variables.

Page 19: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Correlational Research: describes the relationship between two or more naturally occurring variables (predictor and criterion).

-Does having a resilient personality relate to mental health outcomes following natural disaster?-Does pre-existing STD infection increase susceptibility to HIV infection? -When the sun is out more, are people happier?

Which is the predictor variable? In correlational research the predictor is measured not manipulated.

Page 20: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: Correlational

Advantage: study naturally occurring variables

Disadvantage: correlation is not causation

You cannot draw causal conclusions from correlational results.

Page 21: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: Experimental Experimental Research: examines cause and

effect relationships between variables.

Independent Variable (IV) Variable that is the CAUSE of the dependent variable Variable that is manipulated by the experimenter

Dependent Variable (DV) Variable that is the EFFECT Variable that is measured

NOTE: The IV is manipulated, which helps make it independent of other variables.

Page 22: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: ExperimentalExamples (name the IV & DV): -Are children more likely to be aggressive after being shown violent media content to children (or is there no effect)?

-What impact does having a Black person (or not) in an otherwise White group have on decision making?

-Is someone more likely to be attracted to you if you emphasize your similarities or differences?

-How does alcohol consumption (or not) relate to male decision-making regarding sexual encounters?

Page 23: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: Experimental

Advantage: cause/effect relationships

Disadvantage: can’t manipulate all variables (impossible or ethical reasons).

Page 24: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Demos

Name that method DEMO Name that method for your research.

Page 25: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

The End

Page 26: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: Experimentalrandom assignment—each participant in the experiment has to have an equal chance of being in any condition, so the conditions start the same. [DEMO]

25 participants needed per condition for a between-participants design.

½ are told about someone similar ½ told about someone different

Page 27: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Quasi-experiment

Lack of control over the assignment of participants to conditions and/or does not manipulate the causal variable of interest.

A quasi-independent variable is not a true independent variable that is manipulated by the researcher but rather is an event that occurred for other reasons.

Page 28: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Examples Does smoking cause cancer? Did 9/11 cause an increase in prejudice against

people of middle-eastern decent? Do Republican vs. Democratic presidents affect

the economy? Do extreme events (i.e., winning the lottery or

being paralyzed) affect day-to-day happiness? Does giving employees a raise or extra vacation

time boost productivity and job satisfaction? Does campus crime affect applicants to a

university?

Page 29: NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Measure: Experimental

Advantage: can investigate quasi- independent variables that are impossible or unethical to manipulate

Disadvantage: internal validity threats undermine causal conclusions