Myths and Facts About Brain-based Music Pedagogy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Myths and Facts About Brain-based Music Pedagogy

    1/2

    MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT BRAIN-BASED MUSIC PEDAGOGY

    Donald A. Hodges

    Music Research Institute

    University of North Carolina at Greensboro

    Abstract

    The Neurosciences of Music(2003) andThe Biological Foundations of Music(2001) are

    just two recent publications by the New York Academy of Sciences that provide an

    indication of the recent upsurge in neuromusical research. The good news is this upsurge

    of interest in neuromusical research is providing ever more information that can inform

    the music teaching-learning process. The bad news is that considerable misunderstanding

    is causing practitioners to put stock in exaggerated claims that are unsupported by data.

    The purpose of this multimedia presentation is to identify what practices, if any, may be

    based on solid evidence and what practices are not supported by the data. Among recent

    findings, for example, is mounting evidence to support the notion that extensive musicalexperiences, especially when initiated at an early age, have consequences for the

    morphology of the brain. (In fairness, it should be noted that this likely true of nearly any

    activity in which one engages over a long period of time.) Some have used research

    findings such as this to make very strong claims for music pedagogy applications. An

    analysis of the literature leads to three broad conclusions: (1) we simply dont know

    enough yet to make very many particular music teaching applications, (2) a limited

    number of practices may be supported by the evidence, and (3) a number of suggestions

    have been made that do not hold up under careful scrutiny.

    Background

    The good news is that a recent upsurge of interest in neuromusical research is providing

    ever more information that can inform the music teaching-learning process. The bad

    news is that considerable misinformation is causing practitioners to put stock in

    exaggerated claims that are unsupported by data.

    Aims

    The purpose of this multimedia presentation is to separate the wheat from the chaff

    and to identify what practices, if any, may be based on solid evidence and what practices

    are not supported by the data.

    Main Contribution

    The Neurosciences of Music(2003) andThe Biological Foundations of Music(2001) are

    just two recent publications by the New York Academy of Sciences that provide an

    indication of the recent upsurge in neuromusical research. Among the findings, for

    example, is mounting evidence to support the notion that extensive musical experiences,

    especially when initiated at an early age, have consequences for the morphology of the

    ISBN 1-876346-50-7 2004 ICMPC 122

  • 8/12/2019 Myths and Facts About Brain-based Music Pedagogy

    2/2

    brain. (In fairness, it should be noted that this likely true of nearly any activity in which

    one engages over a long period of time.)

    Some have used research findings to make very strong claims for music pedagogy

    applications. The paired notions of the Mozart effect and music makes you smarter,

    for example, have caught hold in the publics imagination and among many music

    teachers. Strong counter reactions have come from music researchers, psychologists, andcognitive neuroscientists.

    Implications

    An analysis of the literature leads to three broad conclusions: (1) we simply dont know

    enough yet to make very many particular music teaching applications, (2) a limited

    number of practices may be supported by the evidence, and (3) a number of suggestions

    have been made that do not hold up under careful scrutiny.

    ICMPC8, Evanston, IL, USA August 3-7, 2004

    123