My Jurnal DM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    1/44

    Internist Departement Jurnal Reading

    Endocrine-Metabolic Sub-Department

    Mulawarman University Medical Faculty

    RSUD A. Wahab Sjahranie

    Effect Of A High-Protein, Low-Carbohydrate Diet

    On Blood Glucose Control in PeopleWith Type 2 Diabetes

    Oleh

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    2/44

    Oleh

    LEMBAR PENGESAHAN

    Jurnal Reading

    Effect Of A High-Protein, Low-Carbohydrate Diet On Blood

    Glucose Control in People With Type 2 Diabetes

    Dibawakan Dalam Rangka Tugas Kepaniteraan Klinik

    Laboratorium Ilmu Penyakit Dalam

    Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Mulawarman

    RSUD Abdul Wahab Sjahranie

    Oleh

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    3/44

    Effect of a High-Protein, Low-Carbohydrate Diet onBlood Glucose Control in People With Type 2 DiabetesMary C. Gannon1,2,3 and Frank Q. Nuttall1,3

    There has been interest in the effect of various types

    and amounts of dietary carbohydrates and proteins onblood glucose. On the basis of our previous data, wedesigned a high-protein/low-carbohydrate, weight-main-taining, nonketogenic diet. Its effect on glucose controlin people with untreated type 2 diabetes was deter-mined. We refer to this as a low-biologically-available-glucose (LoBAG) diet. Eight men were studied using arandomized 5-week crossover design with a 5-weekwashout period. The carbohydrate:protein:fat ratio ofthe control diet was 55:15:30. The test diet ratio was20:30:50. Plasma and urinary -hydroxybutyrate weresimilar on both diets. The mean 24-h integrated serumglucose at the end of the control and LoBAG diets was198 and 126 mg/dl, respectively. The percentage ofglycohemoglobin was 9.8 0.5 and 7.6 0.3, respec-tively. It was still decreasing at the end of the LoBAGdiet. Thus, the final calculated glycohemoglobin wasestimated to be 6.35.4%. Serum insulin was de-creased, and plasma glucagon was increased. Serumcholesterol was unchanged. Thus, a LoBAG diet in-gested for 5 weeks dramatically reduced the circulating

    glucose concentration in people with untreated type 2diabetes. Potentially, this could be a patient-empower-ing way to ameliorate hyperglycemia without pharmaco-logical intervention. The long-term effects of such a dietremain to be determined. Diabetes 53:23752382, 2004

    (5). This seems to be due largely to a rapid, progressive

    decrease in the rate of glycogenolysis (5,6). Hepatic gly-cogen stores in turn are dependent on the content ofcarbohydrate in the diet (6). Thus, a reduced-carbohydratediet should result in a lower overnight fasting glucoseconcentration.

    To test the hypothesis that a diet that is low in carbo-hydrate and particularly low in food-derived glucose couldlower both the fasting and the postprandial blood glucosein people with type 2 diabetes, we designed a low-carbohydrate diet in which readily digestible starch-con-

    taining foods have been de-emphasized. However, thecarbohydrate content is sufficient to prevent ketosis. Thisis in contrast to the low-carbohydrate diets being advo-cated for weight loss (7). We refer to this as a low-biologically-available-glucose (LoBAG) diet. In our study,we also attempted to ensure weight stability. The effect of5 weeks of this diet on percentage glycohemoglobin and24-h glucose, insulin, C-peptide, -hydroxybutyrate, gluca-gon, triacylglycerol, and nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA)

    profiles in eight men with untreated type 2 diabetes isreported. Urea, creatinine, uric acid, and other data relatedto the metabolism of protein after ingestion of the LoBAGdiet will be reported in a subsequent publication.

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    4/44

    Participants were randomized to begin the study with either the LoBAG or

    the control diet by aflip of a coin. Six participants started on the LoBAG diet,

    and five participants started on the control diet. Unfortunately, three of the

    participants who started on the control diet did not complete the study for

    personal reasons (death of spouse, move across country, chose not tofinish).Therefore, the data are presented on eight participants who completed both

    arms of the study. Participants were admitted to the SDTU on the evening

    before the study. The next day, standardized meals that contained 55%

    carbohydrate, 30% fat, and 15% protein were given for breakfast, lunch, and

    dinner at 0800, 1200, and 1800. Participants were asked to remain in the SDTU

    during the study period with minimal activity.

    On the second day in the SDTU, standardized meals again were given. This

    diet was similar for both baseline studies and is referred to as control/pre

    andLoBAG/pre diet in the figures, depending on which study diet followed

    the inpatient stay. In addition to the meals at 0800, 1200 and 1800, snacks were

    given at 1600 and 2100. Blood was obtained fasting at 0730, 0745, and 0800,every 15 min for the first hour after meals, every 30 min for the next 2 h, and

    then hourly until the next meal. Blood was drawn at a total of 46 time points.

    After this 24-h data accumulation period, the participants were sent home with

    all of the necessary food for the next 23 days as appropriate for the diet to

    which they were randomized

    TABLE 1Patient characteristics

    PatientAge

    (years)Heightin (cm)

    Weightlb (kg)

    BMI(kg/m2)

    tGHb(%)

    Duration ofdiabetes

    (months) Concomitant diseases Medications

    1 69 74 (188) 221 (100) 27 8.7 60 Hypertension, dyslipidemia,coronary heart disease

    Simvastatin, lisinopril,rabeprazole, ASA

    2 72 69 (165) 239 (109) 35 10.0 12 Chronic obstructivepulmonary disease

    Terazosin

    3 51 68 (173) 181 (82) 27 8.6 12 None ASA, naproxen4 66 72 (183) 196 (89) 27 9.0 180 Hypertension None5 82 71 (180) 204 (93) 28 11.2 48 None Lisinopril, ASA 6 56 72 (183) 267 (121) 35 10.1 24 Obesity, dyslipidemia None

    7 51 66 (168) 195 (89) 31 10.0 14 None ASA, naproxen8 59 67 (170) 233 (106) 36 9.4 19 Hypertension, obesity LisinoprilMean 63.3 70 (176) 217 (99) 31 9.6 46Range 5182 6674

    (168188)181267(82121)

    2736 8.611.2 12180

    ASA, acetylsalicylic acid.

    LoBAG DIET AND GLUCOSE CONTROL

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    5/44

    M.C. GANNON AND F.Q. NUTTALL

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    6/44

    LoBAG DIET AND GLUCOSE CONTROL

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    7/44

    (3,023 160 mg h dl1 [168 8.9 mmol h l1]; P0.0004 vs. the 5-week postcontrol and P 0.0001 vs.

    pre-LoBAG). On the basis of these integrated areas, themean glucose concentration over the 24-h periods of studywas reduced from 198 to 126 mg/dl (117 mmol/l) after 5weeks on the LoBAG diet, a 36% decrease (P 0.0001).

    The mean fasting insulin concentrations before andafter 5 weeks on both the control and the LoBAG dietswere identical (12 2 U/ml [72 12 pmol/l]; Fig. 3). Themean 24-h integrated insulin area response above thefasting value was similar after the pre- and postcontrol diet

    response was similar to the control for the first hour afterbreakfast. Subsequently, the glucagon concentration washigher at every time point until 0700 the next morning,except for one time point after dinner. Both the net and the

    total glucagon area responses were significantly increasedafter the LoBAG diet (P 0.05).

    The mean fasting NEFA concentrations were 765 67,654 59, 718 70, and 593 50 Eq/l, before and afterthe control and LoBAG diets, respectively (data notshown). These differences were not statistically significant(P 0.05). The 24-h excursions were similar on thecontrol and LoBAG prediet days. When the LoBAG dietwas ingested, the fasting NEFA was lower and the in-

    crease after the lunch meal was attenuated, as was thedecrease before dinner. The rise after dinner was morerapid and reached a higher concentration.

    The mean 24-h integrated net NEFA area responseswere 5,323 1,187, 2,468 693, 4,525 1,660, and80 1,809 Eq h l1 before and after the control andLoBAG diets, respectively. The small positive area re-sponse after the LoBAG diet was statistically significantlydifferent compared with the response before the LoBAGdiet (P 0.05). Total areas were not statistically different

    from one another.The mean fasting triacylglycerol concentrations were

    264 36, 226 32, 246 27, and 149 23 mg/dl beforeand after the control and LoBAG diets, respectively (Fig.6). The fasting triacylglycerol concentration was signifi-cantly lower after 5 weeks on the LoBAG diet (P 0.05).

    After ingestion of either diet, the triacylglycerol concen-tration increased until 1200 1400, decreased at 2000 2200, increased slightly at 2400, and subsequently

    returned to the fasting value by 0800 the next morning.The mean 24-h integrated net triacylglycerol area re-sponse was not significantly different between diets. How-ever, the mean 24-h integrated total area response wassignificantly lower after 5 weeks on the LoBAG diet (P

    FIG. 4. Mean %tGHb response during the 5 weeks of the control (E) or

    LoBAG diet (F). *The tGHb on the test diet was significantly lower atweeks 3, 4, and 5 vs. the control diet (P < 0.05).

    M.C. GANNON AND F.Q. NUTTALL

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    8/44

    LoBAG DIET AND GLUCOSE CONTROL

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    9/44

    M.C. GANNON AND F.Q. NUTTALL

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    10/44

    lin secretion in people with type 2 diabetes (19). Thedecrease in integrated insulin concentration in the presentstudy undoubtedly is due to the reduced food-derivedglucose content of the diet. Dietary fat does not stimulate

    insulin secretion (20), or it facilitates a modest increase(4,21,22). Fructose (2,23) and galactose (24) ingestion alsoresults in only a small increase in insulin concentration.

    The serum total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol concentra-tions did not change significantly when the fat content ofthe diet was increased from 30 to 50% of total food energy.Most likely, this was because the saturated fatty acidcontent was kept at 10% of energy in both diets. Thetriglyceride concentration decreased as expected with a

    reduction in carbohydrate in the diet (25). A decrease intriglyceride might have been expected to increase HDLcholesterol (26); however, this has not been a consistentfinding (2729).

    The glucagon area response increased 2.5-fold after theLoBAG diet. This increase is less than the fourfold in-crease that we observed in our previous study (12).However, the difference in fold increase is due, in part, toa difference in the response to the control diets. The netarea response to the three 15% protein meals (control

    meals) was less in the previous study compared with thepresent study (139, 127, and 160 vs. 413, 293, and 349 pg h ml1, respectively). Nevertheless, the actual 24-h inte-grated glucagon response also was higher in the currentstudy (893 vs. 525 pg h ml1).

    In summary, a LoBAG diet can dramatically reduce the24-h integrated glucose concentration and consequentlythe percentage of glycohemoglobin in people with type 2diabetes. These positive results occur without a significant

    change in serum lipids, except for a significant decrease intriacylglycerol concentration.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    Thi d d b f h A i

    people with untreated non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metabo-

    lism 45:492 497, 1996

    6. Nilsson LH, Furst P, Hultman E: Carbohydrate metabolism of the liver in

    normal man under varying dietary conditions. Scand J Clin Lab Invest

    32:331337, 1973

    7. Atkins RC:Dr. Atkins New Diet Revolution. New York, Avon Books, 19988. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Melli-

    tus: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of

    Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 21 (Suppl. 11):S5S19, 1998

    9. American Heart Association: Dietary guidelines for healthy American

    adults: a statement for physicians and health professionals by the Nutrition

    Committee.Circulation 74:1465A1468A, 1986

    10. US Department of Agriculture:The Food Guide Pyramid. Washington, DC,

    U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992

    11. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human

    Services: Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

    Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995

    12. Gannon MC, Nuttall FQ, Saeed A, Jordan K, Hoover H: An increase in

    dietary protein improved the blood glucose response in people with type 2

    diabetes.Am J Clin Nutr78:734 741, 2003

    13. Rech ME: Observations on the decay of glycated hemoglobin HbA1c

    in

    diabetic patients. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 104:102105, 1996

    14. Nuttall FQ: A comparison of percent total glycohemoglobin with percent

    HbA1c

    in people with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care21:14751480, 1998

    15. Gannon MC, Nuttall JA, Damberg G, Gupta V, Nuttall FQ: Effect of protein

    ingestion on the glucose appearance rate in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1040 1047, 2001

    16. Bisschop PH, Pereira Arias AM, Ackermans MT, Endert E, Pijl H, Kuipers

    F, Meijer AJ, Sauerwein HP, Romijn JA: The effects of carbohydratevariation in isocaloric diets on glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis in

    healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:19631967, 2000

    17. Jahoor F, Peters EJ, Wolfe RR: The relationship between gluconeogenic

    substrate supply and glucose production in humans. Am J Physiol

    258:E288E296, 1990

    18. Jenssen T, Nurjhan N, Consoli A, Gerich JE: Failure of substrate-induced

    gluconeogenesis to increase overall glucose appearance in normal hu-

    mans: demonstration of hepatic autoregulation without a change in plasma

    glucose concentration. J Clin Invest 86:489 497, 1990

    19. Nuttall FQ, Mooradian AD, Gannon MC, Billington C, Krezowski P: Effect

    of protein ingestion on the glucose and insulin response to a standardized

    oral glucose load. Diabetes Care 7:465 470, 198420. May JM, Williams RH: The effect of endogenous gastric inhibitory polypep-

    tide on glucose-induced insulin secretion in mild diabetes. Diabetes

    27:849 855, 1978

    21. Gannon MC, Ercan N, Westphal SA, Nuttall FQ: Effect of added fat on the

    LoBAG DIET AND GLUCOSE CONTROL

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    11/44

    E F F E C T O F A H I G H - P R O T E I N ,L O W - C A R B O H Y D R A T E D I E T

    O N B L O O D G L U C O S E C O N T R O L

    I N P E O P L E W I T H T Y P E 2 D I A B E T E S

    P r e s e n t e d B y : L i s t y o n o W a h i d R

    M a r y C . G a n n o n A n d F r a n k Q . N u t t a l l

    D e p a r t m e n t o f M e d i c i n e , M i n n e s o t a U n i v e r s i t y , M i n n e a p o l i s , 2 0 0 4

    Pe m b i m b i n g : d r. A n i t a R a m a d h a n i , S p . P D

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    12/44

    AbstractWe designed a high-protein/low-carbohydrate, weight-main-taining, nonketogenic diet.

    We refer to this as a low-biologically-available- glucose

    (LoBAG) diet.

    Eight men were studied using a randomized 5-week crossover

    design with a 5-week washout period.

    The carbohydrate : protein : fat ratio of the control diet was

    55:15:30. Thetest diet ratio was20:30:50.

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    13/44

    Plasma and urinary-hydroxybutyrate were similar on both diets.

    The mean 24-h integrated serum glucose at the end of the

    control and LoBAG dietswas 198 and 126 mg/dl.

    The percentage of glycohemoglobinwas 9.8 0.5 and 7.6 0.3.

    Final calculated glycohemoglobin was estimated to be 6.35.4%.

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    14/44

    Serum insulin was decreased, and plasma glucagon wasincreased. Serum cholesterol was unchanged.

    LoBAG diet dramatically reduced the circulating glucose

    concentration.

    Potentially, this could be a patient empowering way to ameliorate

    hyperglycemia without pharmacological intervention.

    The long-term effects of such a diet remain to be determined.

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    15/44

    RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS

    11 Men Mild, Untreated Type 2 DM

    Doesnt have :- Hematologic abnormalities

    - Kidney disease- Liver disease

    - Macroalbuminuria- CHF

    - Untreated thyroid disease

    Confirmed weight stableat least 3 months

    Instructed maintaincurrent activity level

    3-day food frequencyquiestionaire

    Randomized bya flip of a coin

    6 LoBAG 5 Control

    3 exclude :Death, Move

    Out, NotFinished

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    16/44

    1st day come :

    All subject take pre-control and pre-LoBAG diet as

    standard meal

    2nd day :

    All subject take diet

    depending on which diet

    they were randomizedBlood was

    obtained for

    24 hours *

    Food were sent home

    every 2-3 days for 5

    weeks

    After 5weeks

    Overnight

    fasting bloodwas drawn

    GoHome

    Overnightfasting blood

    was drawn

    All subject take dietdepending on which dietthey were randomized

    Blood was obtainedfor 24 hours *

    Note :* 1st hour every 15

    minutes, 2nd hourevery 30 minutes,

    next every hours

    Every week bloodwas obtained for

    24 hours *

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    17/44

    T ABLE 1 P AT I ENT CHAR ACT ER I ST I CS

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    18/44

    T ABLE 2 COMP OSI T I ON OF DI ET S

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    19/44

    RESULT

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    20/44

    FIG. 1. A: Mean bodyweight while on the

    control ( o) or LoBAG ()

    diet.

    average was 219 10 lb (99 4.5 kg) and 216 10 lb (98 4.5

    kg) at the beginning of the control and LoBAG diets.

    At the end of 5 weeks, the average on the control diet was 215

    10 lb (98 4.5 kg). on the LoBAG diet, 212 9lb (96 4.1 kg).

    BODY WEIGHT

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    21/44

    Urine ketones were monitored twice weekly while participants were on the LoBAG diet.

    24 hour urine ketones were identical at the beginning and the end of the LoBAG diet

    (196 8 and 196 9 mol/l).

    Before and after the control diet, they were 187 7 and 203 10 mol/l.

    URINE KETONES

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    22/44

    FIG. 1. B: Plasma -hydroxybutyrateconcentration after 5 weeks on the

    control ( o) or LoBAG ()diet.

    The mean -hydroxybutyrate concentration was 225 15

    mol/l after 5 weeks on the control diet on the LoBAG

    diet, the mean fasting concentration was 236 27 mol/l.

    Beta-hydroxybutyrate

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    23/44

    The mean was 180 10 mg/dl (10 0.6 mmol/l; Fig. 2A). After 5

    weeks was decreased to 159 11 mg/dl (8.8 0.6 mmol/l) (P = 0.66).

    Control

    Plasma Glucose

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    24/44

    LoBAG

    Plasma Glucose

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    25/44

    the mean was 167 13 mg/dl (9.3 0.7 mmol/l), after 5 weeks on the LoBAG diet was

    significantlydecreased to 119 7 mg/dl (66 0.4 mmol/l) (P < 0.003).

    After 5 weeks on the LoBAG diet, the net mean was decreased by 77% (165 59 mg h /

    dl) (9.2 3.3 mmol h / l; P

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    26/44

    Control

    Serum Insulin

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    27/44

    LoBAG

    It was decreased at 5 weeks on the LoBAG diet (318 39 U h

    / ml (1908 702 pmol h./ l). This was a decrease of 40% from

    the pre-LoBAG value (P < 0.01). The mean 24-h total integrated

    insulin area response decreased by 25%.Serum Insulin

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    28/44

    C-PEPTIDE CONCENTRATIONThe mean before and after the control diet was 0.86 0.08 and 0.91 0.08 pg/ml.

    It was 0.81 0.09 and 0.92 0.08 before and after the LoBAG diet (data not shown).

    The net C-peptide area response was decreased by 34% after 5 weeks on the LoBAG diet (P < 0.05).

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    29/44

    A decrease in tGHb was present 1 week

    after the institution of the LoBAG diet

    and became significantby 3 weeks on the

    diet. At the end of the 5-week period, the

    %tGHb had decreased 22%, from 9.8

    0.5 to 7.6 0.3% (P < 0.0007).

    Glycohemoglobin

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    30/44

    Control

    Plasma Glucagon

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    31/44

    LoBAG

    Plasma Glucagon

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    32/44

    The mean were similar before and after both the control and the LoBAG

    diets (95 11, 91 8, 91 7, and 94 7 pg/ml. After 5 weeks on the

    LoBAG diet, the glucagon response was similar to the control for the first

    hour after breakfast. Both the net and the total glucagon area responses were

    significantlyincreased after the LoBAG diet (P < 0.05).

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    33/44

    NEFA (Nonesterified Fatty Acid)

    The mean NEFA before and after the control and LoBAG diets were 765 67, 654 59, 718 70, and 593

    50 Eq/l. These differences were not statistically significant(P > 0.05).

    The net area responses were before and after the control and LoBAG diets -5,323 1,187, -2,468 693, -4,525

    1,660, and 80 1,809 Eq h / l. The small positive area response after the LoBAG diet was statistically

    significantly different compared with the response before the LoBAG diet (P

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    34/44

    Control

    Triacylglycerol

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    35/44

    LoBAG

    Triacylglycerol

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    36/44

    The mean before and after the control and LoBAG diets were 264 36,

    226 32, 246 27, and 149 23 mg/dl.

    The concentration was significantlylower after 5 weeks on the LoBAG

    diet (P < 0.05).

    The net triacylglycerol area response was not significantly different

    between diets.

    The total area response was significantly lower after 5 weeks on the

    LoBAG diet (P < 0.05).

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    37/44

    CHOLESTEROL

    The total cholesterol concentrations before and after the control and the LoBAG diets were 195 7, 184 17,

    188 10, and 177 8 mg/dl.

    The LDL cholesterol before and after the control and the LoBAG diets concentrations were 105 9, 102 2,

    105 7, and 110 6 mg/dl

    The HDL cholesterol concentrations before and after the control and the LoBAG diets were 38 1, 37 2, 37

    2, and 36 2 mg/dl.

    Total, LDL, and HDL concentrations were not significantly different between diets or before and after each diet.

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    38/44

    D I S C U S S I O N

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    39/44

    The study was designed to be 5 weeks in duration because 33 days had been reported to be

    the half-time for glycohemoglobin to reach a new steady state (13). If this is the point, then the

    anticipated final percentage of glycohemoglobin would be 5.4 %.

    We previously determined that with the glycohemoglobin method that we use, each 1%

    glycohemoglobin represents 20 mg/dl glucose integrated over a 24-h period (14). Using this

    information and the 24-h integrated glucose concentration observed at the end of the 5 weeks on the

    LoBAG diet, the estimated final percentage of glycohemoglobin would be 6.3%.

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    40/44

    The LoBAG diet resulted in a decrease in 24-h integrated insulin concentration. In our previous

    study in which the protein content of the diet was increased from 15 to 30% of total food

    energy, the 24-h integrated insulin concentration was slightly increased when compared with

    the same control diet used in the present study (12).

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    41/44

    The serum total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol concentrations did not change significantly

    when the fat content of the diet was increased from 30 to 50% of total food energy.

    Most likely, this was because the saturated fatty acid content was kept at 10% of energy

    in both diets. The triglyceride concentration decreased as expected with a reduction in

    carbohydrate in the diet (25).

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    42/44

    The glucagon area response increased 2.5-fold after the LoBAG diet. This increase is less than

    the four-fold increase that we observed in our previous study (12).

    Nevertheless, the actual 24-h integrated glucagon response also was higher in the current study

    (893 vs. 525 pg h / ml).

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    43/44

    In summary, a LoBAG diet can dramatically reduce the 24-h integrated glucose concentration

    and consequently the percentage of glycohemoglobin in people with type 2 diabetes.

    These positive results occur without a significant change in serum lipids, except for a

    significant decrease in triacylglycerol concentration.

  • 7/24/2019 My Jurnal DM

    44/44

    T H A N K S