Mpob Print

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    1/22

    Q.1. Define emotional intelligence. Explain Golemans model of

    emotional intelligence.

    ANS:

    EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE:

    Emotional Intelligence - EI - is a relatively recent behavioural

    model, rising to prominence with Daniel Goleman's 1995 Book

    called 'Emotional Intelligence'.

    The early Emotional Intelligence theory was originally developed

    during the 1970s and 80s by the work and writings of

    psychologists Howard Gardner (Harvard), Peter Salovey (Yale)

    and John 'Jack' Mayer (New Hampshire).

    Emotional Intelligence is increasingly relevant to organizational

    development and developing people, because the EI principles

    provide a new way to understand and assess people's behaviours,

    management styles, attitudes, interpersonal skills, and potential.

    Emotional Intelligence is an important consideration in human

    resources planning, job profiling, recruitment interviewing and

    selection, management development, customer relations and

    customer service, and more.

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    2/22

    Ever since the publication of Daniel Golemans first book on the

    topic in 1995, emotional intelligence has become one of the

    hottest buzzwords in corporate America. For instance, when the

    Harvard Business Review published an article on the topic two

    years ago, it attracted a higher percentage of readers than any

    other article published in that periodical in the last 40 years.

    When the CEO of Johnson & Johnson read that article, he was so

    impressed that he had copies sent out to the 400 top executives

    in the company worldwide.

    "Emotional intelligence is the capacity for recognizing our ownfeelings and those of others, for motivating ourselves, for

    managing emotions well in ourselves and in our relationships."

    Emotional Intelligence in Organization:

    Based on Goleman's work, intelligence in business settings

    typically manifests itself through four intertwined characteristics:

    A strong sense of self-empowerment and self-regulation, which

    together helps employees to make decisions right on the spot if

    that should be necessary

    A positive outlook, promoting constructive responses to the

    challenges of work

    An awareness of our own and other people's feelings, creating

    empathy and facilitating better conversations with customers

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    3/22

    A mastery of fear, anxiety, and the ability to tap into selfless

    motives, which make it possible for employees to express feelings

    of empathy and caring

    To no small degree, these can be intrinsic features of a human

    being's personality. Even so, companies particularly those with

    far-flung networks of thousands or even tens of thousands of

    employees can take practical steps to encourage and enhance

    them.

    Companies can begin by hiring emotionally intelligent frontlineemployees in the first place: a business starts with an obvious

    advantage if it can attract people born or brought up with the

    right emotional instincts for frontline employment.

    Many companies can ride on the coattails of others with first-rate

    customer-facing skills, since the latter have already identified the

    most suitable type of employee for the work. More than half of thebranch managers hired by Bank of America in 2004, for instance,

    came from retailers (such as Best Buy, The Gap, and Safeway)

    outside of financial services. According to the bank, "They get the

    retail mind-set and we get them to understand banking. They like

    being up on their feet and don't want to sit behind a desk."

    Golemans Model of Emotional Intelligence:

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    4/22

    Daniel Goleman and the Hay Group have identified a set of

    competencies that differentiate individuals with Emotional Intelligence.

    The competencies fall into four clusters:

    Self-Awareness: Capacity for understanding one's emotions,

    one's strengths, and one's weaknesses.

    Self-Management: Capacity for effectively managing one's

    motives and regulating one's behavior.

    Social Awareness: Capacity for understanding what others are

    saying and feeling and why they feel and act as they do.

    Relationship Management: Capacity for acting in such a way

    that one is able to get desired results from others and reach

    personal goals.

    The most popular and accepted mixed model of emotional

    intelligence is the one proposed by Goleman (1995). He viewed

    emotional intelligence as a total of personal and social

    competences. Personal competence determines how we manage

    ourselves, whereas social competence determines how we handle

    our interpersonal relationships.

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    5/22

    A presentation of Golemans model of emotional intelligence.

    Personal competence:

    It comprises of three dimensions of emotional intelligence, such

    as, self-awareness, self-regulation and motivation. Self-awareness

    is the ability of an individual to observe him/herself and to

    recognize 'a feeling as it happens.

    The hallmarks of this ability are self-confidence, self- assessment

    and openness to positive criticism. Self-regulation is the ability to

    control emotions and to redirect those emotions that can have

    negative impact.

    Trustworthiness, integrity, tolerance of ambiguity and attitude to

    accept change are some characteristics of this ability. Motivation

    is the ability to channelize emotion to achieve a goal through self-

    control and by moderating impulses as per the requirement of the

    situation.

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    6/22

    Social competence:

    It comprises of two dimensions namely, empathy and social

    skills.

    Empathy is the ability to feel and get concerned for others, take

    their perspective and to treat people according to their emotional

    reactions. People with this ability are experts in generating and

    motivating others.

    Social skills are the ability to build rapport and to manage

    relationships with people. People having this skill are veryeffective in persuasiveness and team management. Social skill is

    the culmination of all other components of emotional intelligence

    assuming that people can effectively manage social and work

    relationships only when they can understand and control their

    own emotion and can emphasize with the feelings of others.

    Q.2. What are the hindrances that we face in perception?

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    7/22

    ANS:

    BARRIERS TO PERCEPTION:

    Individuals have a tendency to use a number of shortcuts when they

    judge others. An understanding of these shortcuts can be helpful toward

    recognizing when they can result in significant distortions.

    1. Selective Perception: Any characteristic that makes a person,

    object, or event stand out will increase the probability that it will be

    perceived. It is impossible for an individual to internalize and assimilate

    everything that is seen .Only certain stimuli can be taken in selectively.

    Selectivity works as a shortcut in judging other people by allowing us to

    speed-read others, but, not without the risk of drawing an inaccurate

    picture. The tendency to see what we want to see can make us draw

    unwarranted conclusions from an ambiguous situation.

    2. Projection: This tendency to attribute ones own characteristics to

    other people which is called projection can distort perceptions made

    about others. When managers engage in projection, they compromise

    their ability to respond to individual differences. They tend to see people

    as more homogeneous than they really are.

    3. Halo Effect: The halo effect (Murphy & Anhalt, 1992) occurs when

    we draw a general impression on the basis of a single characteristic. For

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    8/22

    example, while appraising the lecturer, students may give prominence

    to a single trait, such as, enthusiasm and allow their entire evaluation to

    be tainted by how they judge the instructor on that one trait which

    stood out prominently in their estimation of that person. Research

    suggests that it is likely to be most extreme when the traits to be

    perceived are ambiguous in behavioral terms, when the traits have

    moral overtones, and when the perceiver is judging traits with which he

    or she has had limited experience.

    4. Contrast Effects: Individuals do not evaluate a person in isolation.

    Other persons they have encountered recently influence their reaction

    to one person. For example, an interview situation in which one sees a

    pool of job applicants can distort perception. Distortions in any given

    candidates evaluation can occur as a result of his or her place in the

    interview schedule.

    5. Stereotyping: Stereotypingjudging someone on the basis of our

    perception of the group to which he or she belongs. Generalization isnot without advantages (Hilton & Hippel, 1996). It is a means of

    simplifying a complex world, and it permits us to maintain consistency.

    The problem, of course, is when we inaccurately stereotype. In

    organizations, we frequently hear comments that represent stereotypes

    based on gender, age, race, ethnicity, and even weight. From a

    perceptual standpoint, if people expect to see these stereotypes, that is

    what they will perceive, whether or not they are accurate

    6. First-impression error: Individuals place a good deal of importance

    on first impressions. First impressions are lasting impressions. We tend

    to remember what we perceive first about a person, and sometimes we

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    9/22

    are quite reluctant to change our initial impressions. First-impression

    error means the tendency to form lasting opinions about an individual

    based on initial perceptions. Primacy effects can be particularly

    dangerous in interviews, given that we form first impressions quickly

    and that these impressions may be the basis for long-term employment

    relationships.

    Q.3. Describe the bases of power.

    ANS:

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    10/22

    BASES OF POWER:

    Power s the ability to make things happen in the way an individual

    wants, either by self or by the subordinates. The essence of

    power is control over the behavior of others (French &

    Raven, 1962).

    Managers derive power from both organizational and

    individual sources. There two kinds of power Formal

    and Informal.

    Formal Power consists of the following bases - Coercive,

    Reward, Legitimate, Informational

    Informal Power consists of the following bases Expert,

    Rational persuasion, Referent power, Charismatic power

    Positional power Also called "legitimate power", it is the power

    of an individual because of the relative position and duties of the

    holder of the position within an organization.

    Legitimate power is formal authority delegated to the holder

    of the position. It is usually accompanied by various attributes of

    power such as uniforms, offices etc. This is the most obvious and

    the most important kind of power.

    Referent power- Referent power is the power or ability of

    individuals to attract others and build loyalty. It is based on the

    charisma and interpersonal skills of the power holder.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referent_powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charismahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_skillshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_skillshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_skillshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referent_powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charismahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_skills
  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    11/22

    Nationalism and patriotism count towards an intangible sort

    of referent power. For example, soldiers fight in wars to defend

    the honor of the country.

    This is the second least obvious power, but the most effective.

    Advertisers have long used the referent power of sports figures for

    product endorsements, for example. The charismatic appeal of the

    sports star supposedly leads to an acceptance of the

    endorsement, although the individual may have little real

    credibility outside the sports arena.

    Expert power - Expert power is an individual's power deriving

    from the skills or expertise of the person and the organization's needs for

    those skills and expertise. Unlike the others, this type of power is

    usually highly specific and limited to the particular area in

    which the expert is trained and qualified.

    Reward power - Reward power depends on the ability of the power

    wielder to confer valued material rewards, it refers to the degree to

    which the individual can give others a reward of some kind

    such as benefits, time off, desired gifts, promotions or increases

    in pay or responsibility.

    This power is obvious but also ineffective if abused. People who

    abuse reward power can become pushy or became reprimanded

    for being too forthcoming or 'moving things too quickly.

    Coercive power - Coercive power is the application of negative

    influences. It includes the ability to demote or to withhold other

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriotismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriotism
  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    12/22

    rewards. The desire for valued rewards or the fear of having them

    withheld that ensures the obedience of those under power.

    Coercive power tends to be the most obvious but least

    effective form of power as it builds resentment and resistance

    from the people who experience it.

    Informational power - Informational power is based on the

    potential use of informational resources. This influence can occur

    through such means as rational argument, persuasion, or factual data.

    Members of a group can make information into power by giving it to

    others who need it, by keeping it to them, by organizing it in

    some way, by increasing it, or even by falsifying it.

    Q.4. Explain Sensitivity Training.

    ANS:

    Sensitivity training

    (also known as T-group, T standing for training)

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    13/22

    This approach evolved from the group dynamics concept of Kurt Lewin

    and the first sensitivity training session was held in 1946 in State

    Teachers College, New Britain, USA.

    Since then, it spread to numerous training centers in USA and other

    countries. Sensitivity training is a small-group interaction process in the

    unstructured form which requires people to become sensitive to others

    feelings in order to develop reasonable group activity.

    The objectives of sensitivity training are as follows:

    To make participants increasingly aware of, and sensitive to, the

    emotional reactions and expressions in themselves and others.

    To increase the ability of participants to perceive, and to learn

    from, the consequences of their actions through attention to their

    own and others feelings.

    To stimulate the clarification and development of personal values

    and goals consonant with a democratic and scientific approach to

    problems of personal and social decisions and actions.

    To develop concepts and theoretical framework for linking

    personal values and goals to actions consistent with these inner

    factors and situational requirements.

    Process of Sensitivity Training

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    14/22

    Sensitivity training focuses on small group (T-group) with number

    of members ranging from ten to twelve. T-groups are designed to

    provide members with experiential learning about group

    dynamics, leadership and interpersonal relationships.

    The basic T-group training or sensitivity training is to change the

    standards, attitudes and behavior of individuals by using

    psychological techniques and programs.

    Based on the sources from where these members are drawn,

    there may be three types of T-group: stranger-lab, cousin-lab,and family-lab.

    In the stranger-lab, all participants are from different

    organizations and they are strangers to each other.

    In cousin-lab, all participants are from the same organization but

    from different units.

    In family lab, all participants are from the same organization and

    from same unit.

    Q.5. Explain the different leadership styles as per Managerial

    Leadership Grid Theory.

    ANS:

    The Managerial and Leadership Grid:

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    15/22

    The Ohio studies led to two dimensions of leadership behavior-

    concern for tasks and concern for relations. Almost in the same

    style, the Michigan University studies made the distinctionbetween job-centered and production- centered leaders.

    Blake and Mouton rated these concepts in a framework called the

    Managerial Grid. They interpreted the concepts in a broad way.

    Blake and Mouton have used "Concern for Production" and

    "Concern for People'" in their Managerial Grid on horizontal and

    vertical axes respectively.

    Managers may be concerned for their people and they also must

    also have some concern for the work to be done. The question is,

    how much attention do they pay to one or the other?

    This is a model defined by Blake and Mouton in the early 1960s.It

    included:

    Impoverished management

    Authority-compliance

    Country Club management

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    16/22

    Middle of the road management

    Team management

    The Managerial Grid was the original name; the modifications

    were made by Robert R Blake and Anne Adams McCanse.1 After

    the modifications it was named as Leadership Grid.

    THE LEADERSHIP GRID

    Leadership Grid an approach to understanding a leaders concern

    for results (production) and concern for people.

    1. The impoverished style (1, 1). The indifferent Leader (Evade &

    Elude): In this style, managers have low concern for both people and

    production. Managers use this style to avoid getting into trouble. The

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    17/22

    main concern for the manager is not to be held responsible for any

    mistakes, which results in less innovative decisions.

    A leader uses a "delegate and disappear" management style. Since they

    are not committed to either task accomplishment or maintenance; they

    essentially allow their team to do whatever it wishes and prefer to

    detach themselves from the team process by allowing the team to suffer

    from a series of power struggles.

    Features:

    1. Does only enough to preserve job and job seniority.

    2. Gives little and enjoys little.

    3. Protects himself by not being noticed by others.

    Implications:

    1. Tries to stay in the same post for a long time.

    Examples of Leader speak:

    I distance myself from taking active responsibility for results to avoid

    getting entangled in problems.If forced, I take a passive or supportive position.

    2. The country club style (1, 9). The accommodating Leader

    (Yield & Comply): This style has a high concern for people and a lowconcern for production. Managers using this style pay much attention to

    the security and comfort of the employees, in hopes that this would

    increase performance. The resulting atmosphere is usually friendly, but

    not necessarily that productive.

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    18/22

    This person uses predominantly reward power to maintain discipline and

    to encourage the team to accomplish its goals. Conversely, they are

    almost incapable of employing the more punitive coercive and legitimate

    powers. This inability results from fear that using such powers could

    jeopardize relationships with the other team members.

    Examples of Leader speak:

    I support results that establish and reinforce harmony.

    I generate enthusiasm by focusing on positive and pleasing

    aspects of work.

    3. The produce or perish style (9, 1). The Controlling Leader

    (Direct & Dominate):

    This believes in the authority-obedience. With a high concern forproduction, and a low concern for people, managers using this

    style find employee needs unimportant; they provide their

    employees with money and expect performance back. Managers

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    19/22

    using this style also pressure their employees through rules and

    punishments to achieve the company goals.

    This is used in case of crisis management. People who get this

    rating are very much task-oriented and are hard on their workers

    (autocratic). There is little or no allowance for co-operation or

    collaboration.

    Heavily task-oriented people display these characteristics: they

    are very strong on schedules; they expect people to do what they

    are told without question or debate; when something goes wrongthey tend to focus on who is to blame rather than concentrate on

    exactly what is wrong and how to prevent it; they are intolerant

    of what they see as dissent (it may just be someone's creativity),

    so it is difficult for their subordinates to contribute or develop.

    Examples of Leader speak:

    I expect results and take control by clearly stating a course ofaction.

    I enforce rules that sustain high results and do not permit

    deviation.

    4. The middle-of-the-road style (5, 5). The Status Quo Leader.

    (Balance & Compromise):

    It is Organization - man management approach, which believes that theadequate organization performance is possible through balancing the

    necessity to get out work with maintaining morale of people at

    satisfactory level. Managers using this style try to balance between

    company goals and workers' needs. By giving some concern to both

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    20/22

    people and production, managers who use this style hope to achieve

    acceptable performance.

    Examples of Leader speak:

    I endorse results that are popular but caution against taking

    unnecessary risk.

    I test my opinions with others involved to assure ongoing

    acceptability.

    5. The team style (9, 9). The Sound / Team Leader (Contribute &

    Commit) :

    This is based on the aspect that work accomplishment is fromcommitted people; interdependence through a common stake in

    the organization purpose leads to relationships of trust and

    respect. In this style, high concern is paid both to people and

    production.

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    21/22

    As suggested by the propositions of Theory Y, managers choosing

    to use this style encourage teamwork and commitment among

    employees. This method relies heavily on making employees feel

    as a constructive part of the company.

    This type of person leads by positive example and endeavours to

    foster a team environment in which all team members can reach

    their highest potential, both as team members and as people.

    They encourage the team to reach team goals as effectively as

    possible, while also working tirelessly to strengthen the bondsamong the various members. They normally form and lead some

    of the most productive teams.

    Examples of Leader speak:

    I initiate team action in a way that invites involvement and

    commitment.

    I explore all facts and alternative views to reach a sharedunderstanding of the best solution.

    Q.6. Mr. Suresh Kumar is the VP- HR of a leading Financial servicescompany. He is having a meeting with Ms. Rejani Chandran leading HR

    consultant. Mr. Suresh is concerned about creating an environment that

    helps in increasing the job satisfaction amongst employees. Assumethat you are Ms. Rejani, the HR consultant. What suggestions you willgive to Mr. Suresh, for creating an environment that increases job

    satisfaction?

    ANS:

  • 7/31/2019 Mpob Print

    22/22

    Below are the suggestions for creating an environment with

    increased job satisfaction from an HR perspective:

    Provide workers with responsibility-and then let them use it.

    Show respect towards all the staff.

    Provide a positive working environment.

    Reward and recognition.

    Involve and increase employee engagement.

    Develop the skills and potential of your workforce.

    Evaluate and measure job satisfaction.