Upload
vedshree22
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
1/32
MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS
FOR SALESREPRESENTATIVES OF
FMCG COMPANY
BY:
ANUPAM BHATTACHARYA
MOHAMMED DANIAL
SAHIL AGGARWAL
VEDSHREE UPADHYAY
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
2/32
INDEX
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM DEFINITION
OBJECTIVES
LITERATURE REVIEW
STUDY JUSTIFICATION
DATA ANALYSIS
RESULTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
LIMITATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPENDICESa. PSR MOTIVATIONAL SURVEYb. DATA TABLE
c. CHARTS AND GRAPHS
REFERENCES
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
3/32
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify and investigate the factors linked to employee motivation
and job satisfaction of sales representative and to assess the role of work motivation on their
performance. The self-report questionnaire survey was carried out for a total of 64 sales
representatives. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 was used for all
statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were made for job satisfaction factors, workplace conditions,
dimension of decision making, compensation (payment), Recognition and benefits, promotion and
perceived organizational support. Hypothesis were formulated and tested. Perceived organizational
support was found to be the main motivating factor for sales department.
INTRODUCTION
The study focuses on the motivation factors of sales representatives of FMCG industry
particularly in context with pepsicos division of frito lay. To motivate salespeople
effectively, sales managers must have a thorough understanding of human needs and the
concepts of motivation. They must also learn how to use the various forms of sales incentives
and compensation to meet their salespeople's needs.
This study in particular does not only focus upon the incentive system as a motivating factor
but also takes the other significant factors into consideration which are reflected by the
responses of sales representatives of an FMCG company. Sometimes there are problems
within the sales structure which also cause dissatisfaction among the employees. Such
problems are not specific to any particular individual in the sales force but are common to all.
Therefore these problems needs to be addressed for the better sales structure as well as for
increasing the motivation of the sales people. The responses have been collected as a primary
data from the above mentioned respondents working presently.
Problem definition
The problem definition as conveyed by the Pepsi Frito Lay Division was that the Pre-Sales
Representatives (PSRs) were low on motivation.
The reasons found out by interaction from the Customer Executives (CEs), the supervisors of PSRs,
was that the targets were not discussed with the PSRs. The sales target was sent by the target makers
from a centralized division who were not completely aware of the variations in the market demands. It
was found out that the PSRs who knew their markets better than the upper management didnt have a
say and therefore had low motivation from the hefty targets set by these centralized target makers.
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
4/32
OBJECTIVES
To find out the motivation level of pre sales representatives
To determine the components which add to the dissatisfaction of the pre sales
representatives To prioritise and assess the intensity of each component by using various statistical
tools
To suggest the ways and measures which add to the satisfaction
LITERATURE REVIEW
Non financial rewards, such as achievement and recognition, are effective in motivating sales
representatives and are an important part of a managers motivational mix. Like financial
incentives,non financial incentives can be carefully adjusted to produce a strong impact onthe motivation of sales people. In order to use non financial motivators such as job dimension
(challenge, variety and feedback) and leadership characteristics (support and trust) to improve
sales performance, it is important to examine the nature of their roles in influencing the
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of sales people. [Wiese, M & Coetzee, R. 2013. The
importance of nonfinancial motivators to pharmaceutical sales representatives: A
demographic study Southern African Business Review,17(1):23-56-also available via UP
Space]
Another point of view is suggested by sales researcher Rene Darmon. He observes that the
behavioral responses to financial incentives can fall into several categories. Salespersons who
are money-sensitive will be motivated to work harder by an increase in remuneration. There
are also salespersons who are not money-sensitive and do not become motivated (or more
motivated) from an increase in remuneration. Leisure sensitive salespersons have been
found to work less following increased remuneration, whereas income satisfiers adjust the
level of their activities and sales to maintain the income they have been earning (Darmon,
1987).
Alfie Kohn, the controversial author of Punished byRewards, disputes the effectiveness of
reward systems such as incentives bonuses, commissions, and recognition awards. In fact, he
argues that quality of work declines over time because salespeople and other employees
become less focused on the task at hand and more focused on earning the reward. He even
goes so far as to suggest that creativity and quality of work improve when external rewardsare not involved (Kohn,1993).
Growth and development is defined as similar to promotion opportunities. AlHarth (2008)
said that if sales representatives obtain an opportunity to get promotion or career
advancement, it is considered that he is given a chance of growth and development in the
organisation. However, the promotion opportunities and growth and development were
treated separately in the study of Naeem and Malik (2009).
Tan and Waheed (2011) contended that salary is associated with the lower-level needs, such
as the physical and security needs under the explanation of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.
When the pay has satisfied the physiological needs of employees, the additional pay will not
motivate employees any further. Therefore income level plays a role in motivation factors.
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
5/32
STUDY JUSTIFICATION
There have been many factors that play role in the day to day job of a sales representative of an
FMCG Company. This study focuses majorly on the sales representative of pepsico frito lay division
as the research has been done on these people only who also acted as the respondents to the
questionnaire. The importance of each factor was duly noted in the job of the sales representative and
on that basis a questionnaire has been prepared.
The sales structure of pepsico frito lay division is very closely connected and reaches to every corner
of the area that is supposed to be covered through its sales representatives who are very adept in
knowing its customer base. The ground level hierarchy that pepsico in its frito lay division follows is
as follows: Sales representatives who take the orders initially and also collects the payment once the
goods are delivered are supervised by Sales development representative(SDR) who is assigned to
every distribution centre. Customer executive(CE) is the one person who handles the sales distribution
network of a particular area and personally overseas each and every sales representative and SDR.
In brief,
When asked about the Competitor problem, respondents did not consider it a big problem as
they have been quite positive about the growing competition in the market and there is no self
esteem induced in them via company as the frito lay division is quite confident about its
products and its demand in the market.
Technology that the sales representatives of pepsico use is a newly introduced hand held
device where they take the orders and check about the payments, delivery time and date and
other specifications of hundreds of retailers irrespective of the size of the order. This device
helps them a lot in their daily activities and makes the work easier and less tardy. Therefore
the technology is not a daunting factor.
Sales representatives of these companies have very basic formal education. Therefore
Promotion is something that is not on the top of mind for them. Also they are very much
aware about the ground hierarchial structure of the division that they do not expect much
promotion opportunities very often.
Company support from top management is considerably well managed and many programmes
such as chalo baazar, where top management officials walk the streets with with the
merchandisers and sales representatives to know more about the ground reality and the
problems faced by the workforce.
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
6/32
The problems that have been highlighted by the respondents in the survey which may affect
the motivation level of sales representative is as follows:
There is no leave policy for the sales representatives of the company. They are excused only
on the humanitarian grounds. As per the complaint of the respondents they do not know have
any motivation to plan for personal life.
There are a wide number of sales representative who have been working for almost a decade
but they do not enjoy any benefits of seniority against a person joined recently.
Sales representatives had been asked to work for 8hours a day but they are not bound to any
time frame. Apparently the incentives are also not apt according to the efforts devoted.
DATA ANALYSIS:
For the analysis of the data collected from the questionnaires we have used SPSS Statistics,
itis asoftware package used forstatistical analysis.SPSS is a widely used program
forstatistical analysis insocial science.It is also used by market researchers, health
researchers, survey companies, government, education researchers, marketing organizations,
data miners, and others
Statistics included in the base software:
Descriptive statistics:Cross tabulation,Frequencies,Descriptives, Explore, Descriptive
Ratio Statistics
Bivariate statistics:Means,t-test,ANOVA,Correlation (bivariate, partial,
distances),Nonparametric tests
Prediction for numerical outcomes:Linear regression
Prediction for identifying groups:Factor analysis,cluster analysis (two-step, K-means,
hierarchical),Discriminant
For the data analysis of motivational factors of sales representatives of an FMCG company in
particular PEPSI co. Fritolay division we have used factor analysis to summarizes the
information contained in a large no. of variables into a smaller no. of factors
Factor analysis is an inter-dependence technique, it examines the interrelations among a set of
variables. A factor is an underlying dimension that explains the correlations among a set of
variables (It can be represented as a linear combination of correlated variables). It refers to
techniques used to discern the underlying dimensions or regularity in phenomena.
Factor analysis helps in data reduction by combining the variables in a few general and
uncorrelated factors, thereby summarizing all the information contained in the data. It is also
used to identify the hidden dimensions or constructs which may not be apparent from direct
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_programhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statisticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_sciencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_statisticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_tabulationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_frequencyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-testhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANOVAhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonparametrichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_regressionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factor_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cluster_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant_analysis_(in_marketing)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant_analysis_(in_marketing)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cluster_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factor_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_regressionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonparametrichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANOVAhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-testhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_frequencyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_tabulationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_statisticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_sciencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statisticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_program8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
7/32
analysis, all variables are simultaneously considered, each related to all others and still
considering the linear composite of variables. The factors are formed to maximize their
explanation of the entire variable set.
For this analysis we have also used rotation,which is basically to maximize the no. of
variables for which loadings are zero (column wise) and/or maximize the no. of factors for
which loadings are zero (row wise) and as the factors are related we have used oblique
rotation technique
Also, we have used the correlation function to find out the relation between work experience
of the sales representatives and other motivational factors such as holiday, incentives,
distribution area, etc
Instatistics,dependence is any statistical relationship between tworandom variables or twosets ofdata.Correlation refers to any of a broad class of statistical relationships involving
dependence.
Formally,dependencerefers to any situation in which random variables do not satisfy a
mathematical condition ofprobabilistic independence.In loose usage,correlationcan refer to
any departure of two or more random variables from independence, but technically it refers to
any of several more specialized types of relationship between mean values.There are
severalcorrelation coefficients, often denotedorr, measuring the degree of correlation. The
most common of these is thePearson correlation coefficient,which is sensitive only to a linear
relationship between two variables (which may exist even if one is a nonlinear function of theother). Other correlation coefficients have been developed to be morerobust than the Pearson
correlationthat is, more sensitive to nonlinear relationships.Mutual information can also be
applied to measure dependence between two variables
RESULTS
In our research we conducted indepth interviews with sales people and formulated a
questionnaire that was distributed to 100 sales representatives of FMCG company Pepsi co.
in Kolkata, 64 samples were returned which made up to 64% of overall response rate.
There are various factors that influence the motivational factors of the sales representative of
FMCG company, the various factors that we were able to determine from the questionnaires
and the surveys issued by us are:
Holiday
Distribution
Time
Incentive
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statisticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_variablehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_(probability_theory)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_(probability_theory)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_expectationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_expectationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_product-moment_correlation_coefficienthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_product-moment_correlation_coefficienthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robust_statisticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_informationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_informationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_informationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robust_statisticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_product-moment_correlation_coefficienthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_expectationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_(probability_theory)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_variablehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
8/32
Seniority
Competitor
Technology
Promotion
Route Company
Work experience
The data that we were able to analyse from the questionnaire are as follows:
Factor analysis:
o Principal component analysis:
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Holiday 1.000 .697
Distribution 1.000 .848
Time 1.000 .843
Incentive 1.000 .959
Seniority 1.000 .925
Competitor 1.000 .767
Technology 1.000 .821
Promotion 1.000 .974
Route 1.000 .893
Company 1.000 .775
Workex 1.000 .553
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
9/32
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Total
% of
Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of
Variance Cumulative % Total
% of
Variance
Cumulative
%
1 2.789 25.353 25.353 2.789 25.353 25.353 2.590 23.545 23.545
2 2.429 22.078 47.430 2.429 22.078 47.430 2.103 19.122 42.667
3 1.446 13.141 60.572 1.446 13.141 60.572 1.546 14.056 56.722
4 1.256 11.417 71.989 1.256 11.417 71.989 1.414 12.852 69.575
5 1.138 10.347 82.336 1.138 10.347 82.336 1.404 12.761 82.336
6 .881 8.014 90.349
7 .602 5.473 95.822
8 .351 3.192 99.014
9 .075 .683 99.69710 .033 .300 99.997
11 .000 .003 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
From the above we are able to confirm that there should be five factors that will influence the
motivational factors of the Sales representatives of a FMCG company
o Component matrix:
Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3 4 5
Holiday .586 -.533 .064 -.145 -.291
Distribution -.269 .126 -.291 .815 -.276
Time -.134 .535 .376 .112 .683
Incentive .447 .782 -.192 -.318 -.061
Seniority .922 .171 .027 .199 -.186Competitor -.240 -.702 .028 -.454 .039
Technology .594 -.487 -.245 .170 .505
Promotion -.519 .491 -.551 -.378 -.123
Route -.207 .180 .888 -.006 -.301
Company -.746 -.433 -.061 .172 .042
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 5 components extracted.
This is to show what are the components that affect the five factors that we were able to
deduce from the factor analysis of the data from the questionnaires.
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
10/32
Rotated Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3 4 5
Holiday .156 .475 -.633 .104 -.274
Distribution -.153 -.046 -.031 .024 .941
Time .097 .054 .946 -.110 -.057
Incentive .886 -.369 .149 .030 -.091
Seniority .799 .486 -.221 .128 .120
Competitor -.581 .014 -.342 .075 -.545
Technology .035 .584 -.030 .755 -.146
Promotion .019 -.981 .062 .056 .049
Route -.028 .210 .143 -.940 -.074
Company -.853 -.152 -.010 -.033 .166
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Equamax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.
This is to show what are the components that affect the five factors that we were able to
deduce from the factor analysis of the data from the questionnaires. Here we have used the
rotation method and the factors and their constituting components are as follows:1. Constituting of Incentives, Seniority(positively correlated)
2. Constituting of Holiday (Positively Correlated)
3. Constituting of Time(Positively Correlated)
4. Constituting of Technology(positively correlated)
5. Constituting of Distribution(positive Correlated)
Recommendations
The recommendation from the study and the interaction with four CEs was that the right type of
management for the PSR would be Management by Objectives (MBO).
Management by objectives is that type of Human Resource Management where each individual plays
a part in setting the targets through discussions with their immediate supervisors. These individual
targets are set in alignment with the overall organizations goals.
In case of Pepsi Frito Lays Division this same MBO can be used to define the targets for each
individual PSR. He can have a say whether it is possible to achieve that amount of target in thatparticular area at that particular time of the year.
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
11/32
Hence, the motivation can rise as the target would be set by themselves along with the other factors
that affect the sales and motivation of the PSRs.
Another recommendation would be that of dealing with the problem of seniority. In Pepsi Frito Lays
Division all the PSRs get the same work pay regardless of the number of years they have worked.
This problem needs to be addressed keeping in mind the amount of money given to them.
For example they should come up with slabs where each PSR after working for 2 years gets a 2%
raise and 5% and 10% for 5 years and 10 years which shall self-motivate the employees to stay at the
company and work even harder.
LIMITATIONS:
The limitations of the project that we encountered are as follows:
Since members of our sample space do not have access to internet, the interviewers
had to go down to the distribution centers and conduct personal interview and guided
filling of surveys
Time required for data collection was high as the interview sessions and guided
interviews of a large no. of sales representatives required time and resources of the
interviewers
Since the FMCG industry is extremely large and each company follows a model of its
own design and hence it was not within the scope of this project to cover more than
one model of distribution and as such we decided to focus our efforts on the PEPSI
co. Fritolay division
Executive Summary The research is about the Pre-Sales Representatives motivation of Pepsi Frito Lay
division.
The research starts at the point where we are given the problem definition by the
company. The research revolves around the motivations of the Pre-Sales
Representatives (PSRs).
The PSRs were questioned with a questionnaire designed for them were different
factors came out regarding the motivations that actually motivate the PSRs to do work
and increase their sales.
The major factors that came out through factor analysis was a combination of
seniority of PSRs and the incentives given as Factor 1, holidays given to PSRs as
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
12/32
Factor 2, working hours of their work as Factor 3, technology that they use for taking
orders as Factor 4 and distribution as Factor 5.
These factors or their combinations were found out to be the reasons behind the level
of motivation that the PSRs contain.
The research recommends to inculcate Management by Objective for the Pepsi FritoLays division in order to increase motivation through above factors.
Appendices:Here we have given the data that we were able to collect from the questionnaire and survey
that we conducted:
Questionnaire:
PSR MOTIVATION SURVEY
1) How long have you been working as a salesman?a) Less than 1 year
b) 1-5 years
c) 5-10 years
d) Above 10 years
2) How long have you worked for Pepsi Frito Lay Division?
a) Less than 1 year
b) 1-5 years
c) 5-10 years
d) Above 10 years
3) How much does the competitors product form a barrier to higher sales when pitching for the
sale of products?
a) High
b) Medium
c) Low
4) How much does the lack of availability of products from the distributors side have an impact
on sales?
a) High
b) Medium
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
13/32
c) Low
5) The support (chalo bazaar days, pep talks) from the upper management in your efforts to
make sales is
a) Satisfactory
b) Dissatisfactory
6) The device (Hand held) that Pepsi Frito Lay provides is
a) Satisfactory
b) Dissatisfactory
7) Stipulated work hours conform to the actual working hours
a) Agree
b) Disagree
8) Would you be ready to give extra time to work if you are provided with the overtime pay?a) Yes
b) No
9) Are you satisfied with current promotion system?
a) Satisfied
b) Dissatisfied
10)Do you think that there is a scope for you to become an SDR from a PSR if you really work
hard?a) Yes
b) No
11)Do you think there should be provisions for PSRs working over a certain period of time
which is currently absent from the system?
a) Yes
b) No
12)How dynamic is your CE when it comes to your day-to-day work?
a) High
b) Medium
c) Low
13)Does the existence of wholesale markets of your product create a problem while dealing with
retailers?
a) Yes
b) No
14)Incentives and bonuses in a year against the extra efforts required to achieve them are enough.
a) Agree
b) Disagree
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
14/32
15)Distribution of routes is satisfactory
a) Agree
b) Disagree
16)How satisfied are you with your job as a PSR?
a) Highb) Medium
c) Low
17)How would you rank the following when it comes to as a barrier to your selling more
products?
(Rank in descending order with the most difficult barrier being 1 and so on)
a) Competitor Problem
b) Hangar Problemc) Distributor Problem
d) Technology Problem
e) Promotion Problem
f) Time Problem
g) Incentive Problem
h) Seniority Problem
i) Route distribution Problem
j) Company support Problem
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
15/32
Data table :o Competitor
33 1
High Medium Low 34 11 1 35 1
2 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 1
25 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 12 38 14 6432 1 Percentage 18.75 59.375 21.875
Competitor
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
16/32
CE Help
33 1
High Medium Low 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 125 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 26 28 10 64
32 1 Percentage 40.625 43.75 15.625
CE Help
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
17/32
Satisfaction from jobs
33 1
High Medium Low 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 1
25 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 18 38 8 64
32 1 Percentage 28.125 59.375 12.5
Satisfaction
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
18/32
Management Support
33 1
Satisfactory Neutral Dissatisfactory 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 125 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 44 14 6 64
32 1 Percentage 68.75 21.875 9.375
Management Support
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
19/32
Promotion System
33 1
Satisfactory Neutral Dissatisfactory 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 117 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 125 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 4 12 48 64
32 1 Percentage 6.25 18.75 75
Promotion System
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
20/32
Technology
33 1
Satisfactory Neutral Dissatisfactory 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 1
25 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 48 8 8 64
32 1 Percentage 75 12.5 12.5
Technology
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
21/32
Work Time
33 1
Agree Disagree 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 125 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 14 50 64
32 1 Percentage 21.875 78.125
Work Time
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
22/32
Incentive
33 1
Agree Disagree 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 1
25 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 12 52 64
32 1 Percentage 18.75 81.25
Incentives
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
23/32
Route
33 1
Agree Disagree 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 125 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 16 48 64
32 1 Percentage 25 75
Route
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
24/32
Overtime Pay for Extra Work
33 1
Yes No 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 117 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 1
25 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 60 4 64
32 1 Percentage 93.75 6.25
Overtime pay for Extra Time
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
25/32
Scope of becoming a SDR
33 1
Yes No 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 117 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 1
25 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 48 16 6432 1 Percentage 75 25
Scope of becoming SDR
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
26/32
Provision for Senior PSRs
33 1
Yes No 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 125 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 48 16 64
32 1 Percentage 75 25
Provisions for Senior PSR
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
27/32
Wholesale Market effects
33 1
Yes No 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 1
25 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 54 10 64
32 1 Percentage 84.375 15.625
Wholesale market effects
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
28/32
Availibility from Distributor
33 1
High Medium Low 34 1
1 1 35 12 1 36 1
3 1 37 1
4 1 38 1
5 1 39 1
6 1 40 1
7 1 41 1
8 1 42 1
9 1 43 1
10 1 44 1
11 1 45 1
12 1 46 1
13 1 47 1
14 1 48 1
15 1 49 1
16 1 50 1
17 1 51 1
18 1 52 1
19 1 53 1
20 1 54 1
21 1 55 1
22 1 56 1
23 1 57 1
24 1 58 125 1 59 1
26 1 60 1
27 1 61 1
28 1 62 1
29 1 63 1
30 1 64 1
31 1 Total 22 32 10 64
32 1 Percentage 34.375 50 15.625
Availibility from distributor
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
29/32
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
30/32
75%
25%
Scope of becoming
SDR
Yes
No94%
6%
Overtime pay for
Extra Time
Yes
No
25%
75%
Route
Agree
Disagree
19%
81%
Incentives
Agree
Disagree
22%
78%
Work Time
Agree
Disagree75%
12%13%
Technology
Satisfactory
Neutral
Dissatisfactory
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
31/32
8/11/2019 Motivational factors for FMCG company
32/32
References
http://www.flexstudy.com/catalog/schpdf.cfm?coursenum=9587a
http://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%
20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdf http://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF20
12_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdf
Wiese, M & Coetzee, R. 2013. The importance of nonfinancial motivators to
pharmaceutical sales representatives: A demographic study Southern AfricanBusiness Review,17(1):23-56-also available via UP Space
Vignali, C. (1994), Selling Skills, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester
Solomon, M. (1994), Consumer Behaviour, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA
http://www.flexstudy.com/catalog/schpdf.cfm?coursenum=9587ahttp://www.flexstudy.com/catalog/schpdf.cfm?coursenum=9587ahttp://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdfhttp://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdfhttp://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdfhttp://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdfhttp://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdfhttp://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF2012_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdfhttp://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF2012_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdfhttp://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF2012_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdfhttp://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF2012_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdfhttp://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF2012_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdfhttp://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF2012_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdfhttp://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icmef2012_proceeding/069_204_ICMEF2012_Proceeding_PG0824_0847.pdfhttp://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdfhttp://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/2013%20marketing%20Article_MW_Motivating%20sales%20representatives_not%20up%20space%20linke.pdfhttp://www.flexstudy.com/catalog/schpdf.cfm?coursenum=9587a