Upload
holt
View
23
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Mokka vs. LCDG4 Comparison. Guilherme, Jeremy Sep.17, 2003. Data Samples. Single particle samples, 1000 evts each 10 GeV muons 50 Gev pions (flat in phi) 50 electrons (theta = 60 °, phi = 90° ) Warning: different kinematics!!. Energy per ECal layer - pions. Energy per HCal layer - pions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Mokka vs. LCDG4 Comparison
Guilherme, JeremySep.17, 2003
Data Samples
Single particle samples, 1000 evts each
• 10 GeV muons
• 50 Gev pions (flat in phi)
• 50 electrons (theta = 60°, phi = 90°)
Warning: different kinematics!!
Energy per ECal layer - pions
Energy per HCal layer - pions
Live energy per cell in ECal
Live energies per cell in Hcal
LCDG4: Eabs per cell in Ecal
LCDG4: Eabs in Ecal (log scale)
LCDG4: Eabs per cell in Hcal
Total live energy - pions
Total corrected energy - pions
Total live energy – electrons
Total corrected energy – electrons
Conclusions• Likely there are still some bugs in LCDG4
• Despite clear disagreements in EM showers between Mokka and LCDG4, they show better agreement among them than with Gismo
• None of them are not properly corrected using Gismo-based sampling fractions
• More investigations needed
Next steps• Repeat comparisons using projective LCDG4• Fair comparison: same versions of libraries, same cuts, same kinematics• Find/fix problem with fake peaks in absorber energies