Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MRC April 12, 2013 Page 1
2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 300
Mississauga, ON Canada L5K 2P8
t: 905.823.8500
f: 905.823.8503
www.mrc.ca
MEMO
RE: Halton Region
Dundas Street (Regional Road 5) Transportation Improvements
(from Neyagawa Blvd to Oak Park Blvd)
Class Environmental Assessment Study
FROM: Cristina Lizarazo, E.I.T., MRC
DATE: April 12, 2013
COPIES: Katherine Jim, P.Eng., MRC
OUR FILE: W.O. 3212082
SUBJECT: Dundas Street Class EA Study
Noise Assessment
1. Introduction
Halton Region is undertaking a Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) Study for road
improvements along the Dundas Street (Regional Road 5) corridor from Neyagawa Boulevard to
Oak Park Boulevard, within the Town of Oakville. The road improvements include the
implementation of curb lane High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/ transit operations in the interim
(2021) and the long term goal for higher order transit use (i.e. dedicated transit lane) by 2031.
Dundas Street will be reconstructed to a 6 lane cross-section. Dundas Street currently operates
with a posted speed limit of 80 km/hr but will be reduced to 60 km/hr in the future as the road
transitions from a rural corridor to a pedestrian and cyclist friendly urban road.
As part of the Class EA Study, a noise assessment was conducted to assess the potential increase
in noise level to noise sensitive areas as a result of the proposed improvements to Dundas Street.
Existing land uses south of Dundas Street are mainly residential (River Oaks community) and
north of Dundas Street, lands are being developed for future residential uses with some
neighbourhood commercial areas. The noise assessment was undertaken based on a selection of
several existing homes within the corridor (south side of Dundas Street). These residential
houses located adjacent to Dundas Street were selected to represent the potential noise impact to
residential houses in proximity to Dundas Street.
Early on in the EA process, a noise analysis was carried out for this section of Dundas Street and
the findings of this noise analysis indicated that the projected noise increase from the widening
of Dundas Street would be less than 5 dBA, and therefore would not warrant the consideration of
noise mitigation as per the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) / Ministry of Environment (MOE)
Halton Region
Dundas Street Improvements (from Neyagawa Blvd to Oak Park Blvd)
Class Environmental Assessment Study
Noise Assessment
Technical Memorandum
MRC April 12, 2013 Page 2
Noise Protocol (see Section 2). However, the Region recognized that existing noise levels at
several residential houses within the River Oaks community exceeded 60 dBA, which is the
threshold for sound level criteria in the Halton Region Noise Abatement Policy. In addition, the
noise impact studies carried out as part of the development application process for the River
Oaks community was undertaken when Dundas Street was under the jurisdiction of MTO, and
assumed Dundas Street to be ultimately at 4 lanes. The criteria assumed at the time would have
been different from what Halton Region required in a noise impact study for development
application. In response, the Region retained MRC to carry out on-site sound level measurements
along with an additional noise analysis in the River Oaks community. Based on findings of the
analysis, the Region is committed to replacing the existing developer walls for the houses
directly adjacent to Dundas Street, including those separated by an intervening local road with a
noise wall (approximately 3.5 m in height) in order to provide sufficient noise attenuation.
The most recent noise assessment (2013) uses the updated traffic data and compared scenarios of
Dundas Street without improvements for the future 2021 / 2031 horizon years and with
improvements for the interim year 2021 (HOV/transit lanes) and future year 2031 (dedicated
transit lanes).
In addition, it should be noted that future residential development north of Dundas Street will
have to carry out noise assessment as part of the development application process where planned
improvements in the transportation network will have to be taken into consideration. Therefore,
noise assessment for future development is not included as part of the noise analysis carried out
for this Class EA Study.
2. Methodology
Noise levels are predicted in decibels in the A-weighted dBA scale, which best approximates the
human perception of sound over a specified time period. An increase of 2 – 3 decibels in noise
levels is considered to be just perceivable to the average person. It should be noted that a 3 dBA
increase in noise equates to a doubling of traffic volumes.
Ministry of the Environment Guidelines
Since roadway sound levels vary over time, the noise descriptor used in Ontario to assess noise is
the “equivalent sound level” (Leq). Leq is identified as the continuous sound level, which has the
same energy as a time varying sound level over a specified time period. For the purposes of
assessing municipal roadway noise, Leq is calculated on the basis of the 16 hour daytime period,
7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Based on the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
Noise Protocol, where an existing roadway is proposed to be modified / widened adjacent to a
Noise Sensitive Area (NSA), MOE requires that the future noise levels without the proposed
improvements be compared to the future noise level with the proposed improvements. The
assessment is done at the outdoor living area (typically backyards) of each NSA. The provision
of noise mitigation is to be investigated should the future noise level with the proposed
Halton Region
Dundas Street Improvements (from Neyagawa Blvd to Oak Park Blvd)
Class Environmental Assessment Study
Noise Assessment
Technical Memorandum
MRC April 12, 2013 Page 3
improvements result in a greater than 5 dBA increase over the future noise level without the
proposed improvements. If noise mitigation is provided, the objective is a minimum 5 dBA
reduction. Mitigation will attempt to achieve levels as close to, or lower than, the objective level
as is technically, economically and administratively feasible.
The STAMSON 5.0 computer modelling program, which is approved for use in Ontario by the
MOE, was used to assess existing and future noise levels on Dundas Street. This program is
used to predict noise levels generated from the road at the outdoor living areas (typically
backyards) of NSA’s.
3. Analysis
Three scenarios were calculated:
i) future noise levels without improvements to Dundas Street (Year 2021 / 2031)*
ii) future interim noise levels with HOV / transit lane on Dundas Street (Year 2021)
iii) future noise levels with dedicated transit lane on Dundas Street (Year 2031)
The following table summarizes the main assumptions and factors used in the analysis.
Table 3-1 - Factors Used In Noise Analysis
Factor Assumptions
Noise Descriptor Leq (16 hr)
Posted Speed Dundas Street between Neyagawa Blvd and Oak Park Blvd
- 80 km/h (existing)
- 60 km/h (future)
Traffic Volumes
AADT
Dundas Street (Between Neyagawa Blvd and Oak Park Blvd)
- Existing (2011) –– 38279
- Future Interim (2021) – 43200
- Future (2031) – 54200
Truck Percentages
(Medium / Heavy)
Medium truck – 8 %
Heavy truck – 5 %
Receptor Height 1.5 m above the ground
Noise Barrier Existing developer barriers (2.2 m high) were taken into consideration in noise
calculations.
* It should be noted that existing (2011) traffic volumes on Dundas Street were used to represent
the future without widening of Dundas Street scenario as Dundas Street is currently operating at
or near capacity.
4. Noise Sensitive Areas
There are existing residential houses abutting Dundas Street within the study limits on the south
side. Several were selected to be included in the noise calculations as representatives to these
Halton Region
Dundas Street Improvements (from Neyagawa Blvd to Oak Park Blvd)
Class Environmental Assessment Study
Noise Assessment
Technical Memorandum
MRC April 12, 2013 Page 4
residential houses on the south side of Dundas Street. The selected receiver locations are listed
in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 – Receiver Locations
Receiver # Location Characteristic of Property in
Relation to Dundas Street
R1 2533 Longridge Crescent Side Lot
R2 2541 Gill Crescent Side Lot
R3 2509 Capilano Crescent Side Lot
R4 2636 Ironwood Crescent Side Lot
R5 2636 Blackcombe Crescent Side Lot
R6 2564 Harman Gate Side Lot
R7 2624 Castle Hill Crescent Side Lot
R8 2628 Devonsley Crescent Side Lot
R9 2624 Andover Road Side Lot
R10 130 Westfield Trail Frontage to Dundas Street
(separated by Westfield Trail)
5. Results / Conclusion
Noise levels were calculated at the selected receiver locations for the future with and without
improvements on Dundas Street (interim condition with HOV/transit lanes in 2021, and ultimate
condition with dedicated transit lanes in 2031). Table 5-1, along with Exhibits 1a and 1b,
summarize the predicted daytime noise levels at Receivers 1 to 10 with the existing 2.2 m
developer barrier under the existing (2011) / future without improvements scenario and future
with HOV/transit lanes (2021) and dedicated transit lanes (2031) scenarios. The change in noise
level as a result of the Dundas Street improvements is predicted to be less than 5 dBA.
Therefore, the consideration of noise mitigation is not warranted under the MTO/MOE Noise
Protocol. Overall, the receiver locations are expected to experience a decrease in noise levels,
which can be attributed to Dundas Street being widened on the north side (i.e. the distance
between the noise source and receiver increased) and the decrease in the posted speed limit from
80 km/h to 60 km/h.
STAMSON output sheets for existing and future noise levels for Receivers 1 to 10 for the
alternatives are on file with MRC.
However, the noise impact studies submitted as part of the development applications for the
River Oaks Community assumed an ultimate 4-lane Dundas Street under the jurisdiction of
MTO; therefore, the approval of the noise impact studies was based on criteria different from
what Halton Region would use in their current standard.
Halton Region
Dundas Street Improvements (from Neyagawa Blvd to Oak Park Blvd)
Class Environmental Assessment Study
Noise Assessment
Technical Memorandum
MRC April 12, 2013 Page 5
Based on recommendations from a previous noise assessment in 2010 and commitment from the
Region, the Region will provide a noise wall (replacement of existing develop barrier,
approximately 3.5 m in height) at properties directly adjacent to Dundas Street in the River Oaks
Community between Sixth Line and Neyagawa Boulevard, including those that are separated by
an intervening local road. The Region would be responsible for the cost of construction and
maintenance of the new noise barriers. The details of the noise barrier (e.g. type, colour,
aesthetics, etc.) will be determined during detail design and in consultation with the affected
residents through individual / group meetings.
Halton Region
Dundas Street Improvements (from Neyagawa Blvd to Oak Park Blvd)
Class Environmental Assessment Study
Noise Assessment
Technical Memorandum
MRC April 12, 2013 Page 6
Table 5-1: Dundas Street Class EA – Summary of Calculated Noise Levels
Receiver Location
(see key plan)
Distance from Receiver Location to Noise Source (m)
Project Noise Level dBA Leq (16)
Existing (2011) /
Future Without
Improvements
(with 2.2 m
Developer Barrier)
Future With Improvements and 2.2 m Developer Barrier Future With Improvements and 3.5 m Noise Wall
Existing or Future
without
Improvements
Future with Improvements
Future With
HOV / Transit
Lanes (2021)
Change in Noise
Level between
Future with
HOV / Transit
Lanes and
Future without
Improvements
Future With
Dedicated
Transit Lanes
(2031)
Change in Noise
Level between
Future with
Dedicated Transit
Lanes and Future
without
Improvements
Future With HOV / Transit
Lanes (2021)
Future With HOV / Transit
Lanes (2031) GPL HOV/BRT
Receiver 1
2533 Longridge
Crescent
EB – 44.5 m
WB – 54.5 m
EB – 46.0 m
WB – 59.0 m
EB – 40.0 m
WB – 65.0 m 60.2 dBA 58.2 dBA -2.0 dBA 58.9 dBA -1.3 dBA 54.4 dBA 55.1 dBA
Receiver 2
2541 Gill Crescent EB – 32.5 m
WB – 42.5 m
EB – 35.5 m
WB – 49.0 m
EB – 30.0 m
WB – 54.5 m 59.7 dBA 57.3 dBA -2.4 dBA 58.1 dBA -1.6 dBA 55.4 dBA 56.2 dBA
Receiver 3
2509 Capilano
Crescent
EB – 28.5 m
WB – 39.5 m
EB – 33.0 m
WB – 46.0 m
EB – 27.0 m
WB – 52.0 m 59.3 dBA 56.7 dBA -2.6 dBA 57.5 dBA -1.8 dBA 55.0 dBA 55.7 dBA
Receiver 4
2636 Ironwood
Crescent
EB – 29.5 m
WB – 38.5 m
EB – 33.0 m
WB – 46.5 m
EB – 27.5 m
WB – 51.5 m 60.2 dBA 57.6 dBA -2.6 dBA 58.4 dBA -1.8 dBA 55.3 dBA 56.0 dBA
Receiver 5
2636 Blackcombe
Crescent
EB – 27.0 m
WB – 39.0 m
EB – 31.5 m
WB – 45.0 m
EB – 26.0 m
WB – 51.0 m 61.9 dBA 59.2 dBA -2.7 dBA 60.0 dBA -1.9 dBA 55.6 dBA 56.3 dBA
Receiver 6
2564 Harman Gate EB – 33.0 m
WB – 45.0 m
EB – 37.5 m
WB – 51.0 m
EB – 32.0 m
WB – 56.5 m 62.0 dBA 59.5 dBA -2.5 dBA 60.2 dBA -1.8 dBA 56.9 dBA 57.7 dBA
Receiver 7
2624 Castle Hill
Crescent
EB – 28.0 m
WB – 40.5 m
EB – 32.5 m
WB – 46.0 m
EB – 26.5 m
WB – 51.5 m 59.8 dBA 57.3 dBA -2.5 dBA 58.0 dBA -1.8 dBA 54.4 dBA 55.2 dBA
Receiver 8
2628 Devonsley
Crescent
EB – 30.0 m
WB – 40.0 m
EB – 33.5 m
WB – 47.0 m
EB – 28.0 m
WB – 52.5 m 60.7 dBA 58.3 dBA -2.4 dBA 59.1 dBA -1.6 dBA 56.2 dBA 57.0 dBA
Receiver 9
2624 Andover Road EB – 50.0 m
WB – 60.5 m
EB – 52.0 m
WB – 65.5 m
EB – 46.0 m
WB – 71.0 m 59.7 dBA 57.7 dBA -2.0 dBA 58.5 dBA -1.2 dBA 55.0 dBA 55.7 dBA
Receiver 10*
130 Westfield Trail EB – 68.0 m
WB – 80.0 m
EB – 70.5 m
WB – 83.5 m
EB – 65.0 m
WB – 89.5 m 56.2 dBA 54.3 dBA -1.9 dBA 55.0 dBA -1.2 dBA 54.3 dBA 55.0 dBA
* Note: This property is frontage to Dundas Street, therefore the assumptions of noise wall do not apply; the noise calculation did not include the 2.2 m developer barrier.
#3056
#493
#2539
#2523 #2573#2568
#2544 #2526 #2529
#393/399
PizzaPizzaEsso
#237#367
#2479 #2563#2572 #2504
#2622
#2609 #2641#2601
#2599 #2641#2564 #2565
#2619 #2641
Neyag
awa B
ouleva
rdNe
yagaw
a Boul
evard
Dundas Street (Reg. Rd. 5)Dundas Street (Reg. Rd. 5)
Devo
nsley
Cres
cent
Castl
e Hill
Cresc
ent
Harm
on Ga
te
Blackcombe Cres.Ironwood Cres.
Gill C
resce
nt
Town
e Blvd
.
Loga
n Ave
nue
Long
ridge
Cres
cent
Grovehill Road
Valle
y Heig
hts
Cres
cent
Cres
cent
Uppe
r Va
lley
Valley Heights
R34
R34-1114 Upper Valley Crescent
58.0 dBA58.3 dBA
R3556.5 dBA57.2 dBAR35-2455 Upper Valley Crescent
R36
54.6 dBA55.9 dBA
R1
R1-2533 Longridge Crescent
58.2 dBA / 58.9 dBA60.2 dBA
R2
R2-2541 Gill Crescent
57.3 dBA / 58.1 dBA59.7 dBA
R3
R3-2509 Capilano Crescent
56.7 dBA / 57.5 dBA59.3 dBA
R4
R4-2636 Ironwood Crescent
57.6 dBA / 58.4 dBA60.2 dBA
R42
R42-2636 Blackcombe Crescent
57.5 dBA57.8 dBA
R43
R43-2564 Harman Gate
57.1 dBA58.5 dBA
R44
R44-2624 Castle Hill Crescent
57.6 dBA58.9 dBA
54.4 dBA / 55.1 dBA 55.4 dBA / 56.2 dBA 55.0 dBA / 55.7 dBA 55.3 dBA / 56.0 dBA
Capil
ano C
resce
nt
56.7 dBA / 57.5 dBA59.3 dBA
55.0 dBA / 55.7 dBA
Rx
xx.x dBA
xx.x dBA / xx.x dBA
xx.x dBA / xx.x dBA
DUNDAS STREET CLASS EA STUDYNeyagawa Boulevard to Oak Park Boulevard
SUMMARY OFCALCULATED NOISE LEVELS
Exhibit
1a
LEGEND
Rx
xx.x dBA
xx.x dBA / xx.x dBA
xx.x dBA / xx.x dBA
Receiver LocationProjected Future Noise Levelwithout Widening of Dundas StreetProjected Future Noise Level with 2.2m Developer Barrier2021 Widening of Dundas Street (HOV Lanes) /2031 Widening of Dundas Street (Dedicated Transit Lane)Projected Future Noise Level with 3.5m Noise Wall (by Region)2021 Widening of Dundas Street (HOV Lanes) /2031 Widening of Dundas Street (Dedicated Transit Lane)Developer Barrier to be replaced by Noise Wall (Halton Region)
¯
#2529
#393/399 #237#367
#2479 #2563#2572 #2504
#2622
#2609 #2641#2601
#2599 #2641#2564 #2565
#2619 #2641#2636
#2625 #2647#2640 #157
#160
#113 #103#21
#136
#132
#128
#126
#124
#122
#120
#118
Pinevale Estates
#3030
#3042
#3060
#3072
#3094
#3043/ 3051
#5
#41 #87
Sixth
Line
Sixth
LineDundas Street (Reg. Rd. 5)Dundas Street (Reg. Rd. 5)
Red Maple Lane
Westf
ield T
rail
Devo
nsley
Cres
cent
Castl
e Hill
Cresc
ent
Harm
on Ga
teBlackcombe Cres.Ironwood Cres.
Town
e Blvd
.
Millwo
od Dr
ive
Oak Walk Drive
R39-2541 Gill Crescent
57.3 dBA / 58.1 dBA
R3
R40-2509 Capilano Crescent
56.7 dBA / 57.5 dBA59.3 dBA
R4
R4-2636 Ironwood Crescent
57.6 dBA / 58.4 dBA60.2 dBA
R5
R5-2636 Blackcombe Crescent61.9 dBA
R6
R6-2564 Harman Gate62.0 dBA
R7
R7-2624 Castle Hill Crescent59.8 dBA
55.4 dBA / 56.2 dBA 55.0 dBA / 55.7 dBA 55.3 dBA / 56.0 dBA59.2 dBA / 60.0 dBA55.6 dBA / 56.3 dBA
57.3 dBA / 58.0 dBA54.4 dBA / 55.2 dBA
59.5 dBA / 60.2 dBA56.9 dBA / 57.7 dBA
R8-2628 Devonsley Crescent60.7 dBA58.3 dBA / 59.1 dBA56.2 dBA / 57.0 dBA
R9-2624 Andover Road59.7 dBA57.7 dBA / 58.5 dBA55.0 dBA / 55.7 dBA
R10-130 Westfield Trail56.2 dBA54.3 dBA / 55.0 dBA54.3 dBA / 55.0 dBA
R8R9
R10
Ando
ver R
oad
Rx
xx.x dBA
xx.x dBA / xx.x dBA
xx.x dBA / xx.x dBA
¯
Receiver LocationProjected Future Noise Levelwithout Widening of Dundas StreetProjected Future Noise Level with 2.2m Developer Barrier2021 Widening of Dundas Street (HOV Lanes) /2031 Widening of Dundas Street (Dedicated Transit Lane)Projected Future Noise Level with 3.5m Noise Wall (by Region)2021 Widening of Dundas Street (HOV Lanes) /2031 Widening of Dundas Street (Dedicated Transit Lane)Developer Barrier to be replaced by Noise Wall (Halton Region)
LEGEND
DUNDAS STREET CLASS EA STUDYNeyagawa Boulevard to Oak Park Boulevard
SUMMARY OFCALCULATED NOISE LEVELS
Exhibit
1b