16
Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by Greater Sage-grouse Leslie Schreiber Wyoming Game & Fish Department Chris Hansen University of Missouri Mark Rumble USFS Rocky Mtn Research Station Josh Millspaugh University of Montana Scott Gamo Wyoming Game & Fish Department Jon Kehmeier SWCA Environmental Consultants Nate Wojcik SWCA Environmental Consultants Western North American Naturalist 75(3), 2015, pp. 348-363

Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

  • Upload
    lytuyen

  • View
    221

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by Greater Sage-grouse

– Leslie Schreiber Wyoming Game & Fish Department

– Chris Hansen University of Missouri

– Mark Rumble USFS Rocky Mtn Research Station

– Josh Millspaugh University of Montana

– Scott Gamo Wyoming Game & Fish Department

– Jon Kehmeier SWCA Environmental Consultants

– Nate Wojcik SWCA Environmental Consultants

Western North American Naturalist 75(3), 2015, pp. 348-363

Page 2: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Food & Cover Eating – New chicks eat high

protein insects

– Chicks transition to eating forbs later in the summer

Hiding – Vegetation provides

cover from predation

– Vegetation provides cover from weather

Page 3: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Objectives 1. Determine food and cover resources associated

with selection of microsites

2. Estimate how varying resource characteristics (e.g., increasing forb cover) might affect relative probability of selection

?

Tom Koerner

Page 4: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Field Methods

– GPS transmitters – 30 grams

– 50 females

– 6-8 locations / day

Page 5: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Used vs. Available

50 m 250 m

500 m

Tom Koerner

Page 6: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Field Methods: Vegetation

1. Canopy Cover (%) – Daubenmire frame

2. Height (cm)

3. Sagebrush density – Point-centered-quarter method

4. Visual obstruction (cm) – Modified Robel pole

Page 7: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Field Methods: Insects

Page 8: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Analytical Methods Food Models Cover Models

– Insects

– Forbs

– Canopy cover

– Height

– Sagebrush density

– Visual obstruction

Top Food + Top Cover = Best Overall Model

Page 9: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Results

– 105 used sites

– 315 paired-random sites

– 3-4 sites / female / year

Page 10: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Used vs. Available

67% 66%

83%

Tom Koerner

Page 11: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Food Results

Tom Koerner

Page 12: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Food Results cont.

Tom Koerner

Page 13: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Food Results cont.

Tom Koerner

Page 14: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Section C = 46-69 cm

Section D = 69-92 cm

Cover Results

Tom Koerner

Page 15: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Tom Koerner

©Marilynne Manguba/TNC

Tom Koerner

Page 16: Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by …wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2-Schreiber-Cody-TWS-2016.pdf · Microhabitat Selection of Brood-rearing Sites by ... (e.g.,

Advisor

Dr. Joshua Millspaugh

Committee Members

Dr. Mark Rumble

Dr. Frank Thompson III

Dr. Bruce Barrett

Collaborators Mike Paul

Scott Gamo

Garry Miller

Research Associate

Chris Hansen

Insect Crew

Gabrielle Coulombe

Chelsea Jeffries

Tim Schrautemeier

Acknowledgements Field Crew

Mark Doherty Andrea Coleman Alex Foster Brenna Towery Rhianna Golden Jon Fox Matt Gonnerman

Fellow Graduate Students Aleshia Fremgen Tom Bonnot Kathryn Womack Stephanie Zimmer Chris Rota Amy Bleisch Trent Smith Jaymi LeBrun Clarissa Starbuck