Upload
alfred-hui
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
1/36
ECON0301/ECON2252
Sept 2013
1
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
2/36
General equilibrium multiple agents (firms and consumers) all optimizing The aggregation problem: no inconsistency between
aggregate and individual level decisions
One shot environment a static model income=expenditure => balance of trade
Market structure Constant returns to scale, perfect competition
Variable returns to scale, market power (new tradetheory in 80s; new new trade theory in this pastdecade)
2
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
3/36
Preference: Consumer Theory
Technology: Producer Theory
Market Structure: Perfectly Competitive Market
General Equilibrium
3
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
4/36
4
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
5/36
Consumption choice problem
max,
, subject to + .
Equalization of marginal utility per dollar
Marginal rate of substitution = relative price
yx x x
x y y y
MUMU MU P
P P MU P
5
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
6/36
A
At point A, the budget lineBLand some ICaretangential to each other
Omitting the negative signs,
Slope of the IC=
Slope of the BL=
6
y
xBudget line
Indifferencecurve
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
7/36
U=10
U=20
U=30
V=100
V=200V=2001
An order-preserving re-labeling ofICs does not alter thepreference ordering.
7
x
y
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
8/36
11
22
66
222''''
'''
''
222'
yxUU
xyUU
xyUU
yxUU
xyU
They are called positive monotonic transformation
They all refer to the same preferences, leading tothe same choice
8
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
9/36
CD utility function:
Marginal utilities:
1, ,
,
x
U x y U x yx yMU x y
x x x
U x yMUy
y
,U x y x y
9
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
10/36
MRS = relative price
Expenditure shares constant
Very nice demand functions
x x x
y y y
MU P P xy
MU x P P y
andyx
P yP x
I I
, , and , ,x x y y x yx y
I ID p p I D p p I
P P
10
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
11/36
Without loss of generality, we assume
If not, we can always represent the old CD utilityfunction by a new CD function
The preference ordering is still preservedafter such positive monotonic transformation.
The demand functions found out are just thesame as before
1
, where anda bU x y x y a b
11
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
12/36
Unit income elasticity 1% increase in income => 1% increase in
consumption
The aggregation problem Given total income, income distribution does not
affect market demand
12
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
13/36
Suppose there are Nagents, each with the same CD utilityfunction
Suppose their incomes are I1,I2, , IN, summing up to I. The total market demand for xequals
Given the total income, the income distribution itself doesnot affect the market demand. A property need not generally hold for other utility
functions
1
1
N
x x
N
x x
II
P P
I I I
P P
13
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
14/36
Two goods: necessity (x) and luxury (y): px=1, py=1.
Two agents, where I1+I2= I= 10 Suppose each will consume luxury only after x0 < 5 units of
necessity is consumed.
Equal income: the market quantity demanded for xis 2x0;the market quantity demanded for yis 10 - 2x0
Unequal income: suppose I1 < I2 and I1 < x0. Then marketquantity demanded for x is I1 + x0 < 2x0; market quantitydemanded for yis 10-(x0 + I1).
Unequal income diverts resource to luxuries while basicnecessities are not fully provided => income distributionmatters
14
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
15/36
The CD utility function is in the family ofutility functions, for which the ratios of goodsdemanded depend only on relative prices, noton income
can define the relative demand for x by anindividual For example, with CD utility function,
the relative demand is independent of the individualsincome
/yx
y x y x
pD I I
D P P p
15
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
16/36
The relative demand for xin the whole economy isjust the same as the relative demand for xby anyindividual
Take out: With CD utility function, we can talk about The demand for xby the economy without
knowing income distribution, and Relative demand for xby the economy without
knowing the total income
1 2 1 2
/
yx N N
y x y x
pD I I I I I I
D P P p
16
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
17/36
17
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
18/36
total product ( , )
average product of labor
marginal product of labor
average product of capital
marginal product of capital
L
L
K
K
Q f K L
QAP
L
QMP
L
QAP
K
QMP
K
Definitions:
Assumptions:
Diminishing marginal productivity
18
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
19/36
Output elasticity and returns to scale
Suppose
>1 Increasing return to scale (IRTS)
=1 Constant return to scale (CRTS)
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
20/36
When returns to scale do not change withscale, for any t>1, the technology exhibits
IRTS if , ,CRTS if , ,
DRTS if , ,
f tK tL tf K Lf tK tL tf K L
f tK tL tf K L
20
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
21/36
For CRTS technology, there are two niceproperties:
MPKand MPLdepend on capital-labor ratio only,
but not on the absolute scale e.g., MPKthe same when you hire K=3 and L=5,
compared with when you hire K=6 and L=10.
Eulers equation: + = ,
When factors are hired up to = and = , the profit is just zero!
21
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
22/36
, , ( CRTS)
Differentiating it w.r.t , we obtain
, ,
, ,, (chain rule)
, ,
,
Now imposing
f tK tL tf K L
t
df tK tL f K L
dt
f tK tL f tK tLtK tLf K L
tK t tL t
f tK tL f tK tL
K L f K LtK tL
the condition that 1, it becomes
, ,,
t
f K L f K LK L f K L
K L
We show the second property:
22
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
23/36
Firms problem:
Assume each firm is too small to affect inputprices (w, r) and output price (p). If anoptimum exists, will hire Kand Lsuch that
,
max , - -K L
pf K L rK wL
,
,
K
L
f K LpMP p r
Kf K L
pMP p wL
23
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
24/36
Treat the firms problem into a two-stage problem: costminimization, following by output choice.
First, given output quantity, the firm chooses the inputquantities to minimize costs,
Then, chooses quantity
Perfect Competition: uses p = MC.
Monopoly Competition: uses MR = MC.
Imperfect Competition: strategic consideration
,
min subject to ,K L
rK wL f K L Q
24
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
25/36
Doubling input prices simply doubles the total cost:
When RTS does not change with scale, for anyt> 1, the technology exhibits
, , , ,IRTS if
, , , ,CRTS if
, , , ,DRTS if
C r w tQ C r w Q
tQ Q
C r w tQ C r w Q
tQ Q
C r w tQ C r w Q
tQ Q
, , , satisfying
, , , , for all 0
C r w Q
C tr tw Q tC r w Q t
25
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
26/36
26
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
27/36
Isoquant the locusofK and Lsuch thatthe output level isconstant
Bending toward theorigin
L
K
Q =10
Q =20
Iso-cost line
rK+wL= constant
Optimal input
mix to produce
Q=10
27
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
28/36
For CRTS technology and in LR equilibrium,we cannot tell the output level of a particularfirm, because every output level will lead tothe same profit (which is zero) given fixed
input and output prices
28
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
29/36
1
1
(1 ) 1
1 1
( , )
When + =1,
and
Marginal products depend on the / ratio, not on the absolute scale
K
L
K
L
Q f K L K L
QMP K L
K
QMP K LL
LMP K L
K
KMP K LL
K L
29
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
30/36
The technology exhibits CRTS iff + =1.
2 ,2 2 2 2 2 ( , )f K L K L K L f K L
What does +=1 mean?
+>1; IRTS
+=1; CRTS
+
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
31/36
Consider an industry with all firms having thesame CRTS technology: Q= f(K, L); output &input markets perfectly competitive; and firmsmaximizing profits. As a whole, the industry
employs K* and L*.
31
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
32/36
Q1: What is the industrial output? f(K*,L*)
Let K1, K2, , KNbe the amount employed inthe Nfirms; L1, L2, , LNbe the amount employed.
Cost minimization requires that K1/L1=K2/L2= =KN/LN=K*/L*=a.
1 1 2 2
1 1 2 2
1 2
* * *
* *
, , ,
, , ,
,1 ,1 ,1 ( CRTS)
,1 , ( CRTS)
,
N N
N N
N
f K L f K L f K L
f aL L f aL L f aL L
L f a L f a L f a
L f a f aL L
f K L
32
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
33/36
Q2: What is the marginal product of capital (labor)in each firm?
Despite possibly different scales, each firmsmarginal product of capital is simply equal to
f(K*,L*)/K. Similarly, all firms have the same marginal product
of labor = f(K*,L*)/L .
33
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
34/36
Q3: What is the rental rate of capital paid byeach firm? the wage rate of labor paid byeach firm?
Let pbe the price of the good produced in
the industry.
The rental rate of capital is just ,
.
the wage rate of labor is just ,
.
34
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
35/36
What do we know about industrial output? simply work out the problem by assuming all
inputs (K* and L*) are hired by a single firm(which we assume is price taking in both inputand output markets).
we can understand f(K, L) as an industryproduction function.
35
7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf
36/36
Takeout: given same CRTS technology & LRcompetitive equilibrium, total K* and L* inthe sector fully describe the output level,as well as the real rental rate and real wage
rate.