micro for trade.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    1/36

    ECON0301/ECON2252

    Sept 2013

    1

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    2/36

    General equilibrium multiple agents (firms and consumers) all optimizing The aggregation problem: no inconsistency between

    aggregate and individual level decisions

    One shot environment a static model income=expenditure => balance of trade

    Market structure Constant returns to scale, perfect competition

    Variable returns to scale, market power (new tradetheory in 80s; new new trade theory in this pastdecade)

    2

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    3/36

    Preference: Consumer Theory

    Technology: Producer Theory

    Market Structure: Perfectly Competitive Market

    General Equilibrium

    3

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    4/36

    4

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    5/36

    Consumption choice problem

    max,

    , subject to + .

    Equalization of marginal utility per dollar

    Marginal rate of substitution = relative price

    yx x x

    x y y y

    MUMU MU P

    P P MU P

    5

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    6/36

    A

    At point A, the budget lineBLand some ICaretangential to each other

    Omitting the negative signs,

    Slope of the IC=

    Slope of the BL=

    6

    y

    xBudget line

    Indifferencecurve

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    7/36

    U=10

    U=20

    U=30

    V=100

    V=200V=2001

    An order-preserving re-labeling ofICs does not alter thepreference ordering.

    7

    x

    y

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    8/36

    11

    22

    66

    222''''

    '''

    ''

    222'

    yxUU

    xyUU

    xyUU

    yxUU

    xyU

    They are called positive monotonic transformation

    They all refer to the same preferences, leading tothe same choice

    8

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    9/36

    CD utility function:

    Marginal utilities:

    1, ,

    ,

    x

    U x y U x yx yMU x y

    x x x

    U x yMUy

    y

    ,U x y x y

    9

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    10/36

    MRS = relative price

    Expenditure shares constant

    Very nice demand functions

    x x x

    y y y

    MU P P xy

    MU x P P y

    andyx

    P yP x

    I I

    , , and , ,x x y y x yx y

    I ID p p I D p p I

    P P

    10

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    11/36

    Without loss of generality, we assume

    If not, we can always represent the old CD utilityfunction by a new CD function

    The preference ordering is still preservedafter such positive monotonic transformation.

    The demand functions found out are just thesame as before

    1

    , where anda bU x y x y a b

    11

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    12/36

    Unit income elasticity 1% increase in income => 1% increase in

    consumption

    The aggregation problem Given total income, income distribution does not

    affect market demand

    12

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    13/36

    Suppose there are Nagents, each with the same CD utilityfunction

    Suppose their incomes are I1,I2, , IN, summing up to I. The total market demand for xequals

    Given the total income, the income distribution itself doesnot affect the market demand. A property need not generally hold for other utility

    functions

    1

    1

    N

    x x

    N

    x x

    II

    P P

    I I I

    P P

    13

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    14/36

    Two goods: necessity (x) and luxury (y): px=1, py=1.

    Two agents, where I1+I2= I= 10 Suppose each will consume luxury only after x0 < 5 units of

    necessity is consumed.

    Equal income: the market quantity demanded for xis 2x0;the market quantity demanded for yis 10 - 2x0

    Unequal income: suppose I1 < I2 and I1 < x0. Then marketquantity demanded for x is I1 + x0 < 2x0; market quantitydemanded for yis 10-(x0 + I1).

    Unequal income diverts resource to luxuries while basicnecessities are not fully provided => income distributionmatters

    14

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    15/36

    The CD utility function is in the family ofutility functions, for which the ratios of goodsdemanded depend only on relative prices, noton income

    can define the relative demand for x by anindividual For example, with CD utility function,

    the relative demand is independent of the individualsincome

    /yx

    y x y x

    pD I I

    D P P p

    15

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    16/36

    The relative demand for xin the whole economy isjust the same as the relative demand for xby anyindividual

    Take out: With CD utility function, we can talk about The demand for xby the economy without

    knowing income distribution, and Relative demand for xby the economy without

    knowing the total income

    1 2 1 2

    /

    yx N N

    y x y x

    pD I I I I I I

    D P P p

    16

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    17/36

    17

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    18/36

    total product ( , )

    average product of labor

    marginal product of labor

    average product of capital

    marginal product of capital

    L

    L

    K

    K

    Q f K L

    QAP

    L

    QMP

    L

    QAP

    K

    QMP

    K

    Definitions:

    Assumptions:

    Diminishing marginal productivity

    18

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    19/36

    Output elasticity and returns to scale

    Suppose

    >1 Increasing return to scale (IRTS)

    =1 Constant return to scale (CRTS)

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    20/36

    When returns to scale do not change withscale, for any t>1, the technology exhibits

    IRTS if , ,CRTS if , ,

    DRTS if , ,

    f tK tL tf K Lf tK tL tf K L

    f tK tL tf K L

    20

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    21/36

    For CRTS technology, there are two niceproperties:

    MPKand MPLdepend on capital-labor ratio only,

    but not on the absolute scale e.g., MPKthe same when you hire K=3 and L=5,

    compared with when you hire K=6 and L=10.

    Eulers equation: + = ,

    When factors are hired up to = and = , the profit is just zero!

    21

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    22/36

    , , ( CRTS)

    Differentiating it w.r.t , we obtain

    , ,

    , ,, (chain rule)

    , ,

    ,

    Now imposing

    f tK tL tf K L

    t

    df tK tL f K L

    dt

    f tK tL f tK tLtK tLf K L

    tK t tL t

    f tK tL f tK tL

    K L f K LtK tL

    the condition that 1, it becomes

    , ,,

    t

    f K L f K LK L f K L

    K L

    We show the second property:

    22

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    23/36

    Firms problem:

    Assume each firm is too small to affect inputprices (w, r) and output price (p). If anoptimum exists, will hire Kand Lsuch that

    ,

    max , - -K L

    pf K L rK wL

    ,

    ,

    K

    L

    f K LpMP p r

    Kf K L

    pMP p wL

    23

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    24/36

    Treat the firms problem into a two-stage problem: costminimization, following by output choice.

    First, given output quantity, the firm chooses the inputquantities to minimize costs,

    Then, chooses quantity

    Perfect Competition: uses p = MC.

    Monopoly Competition: uses MR = MC.

    Imperfect Competition: strategic consideration

    ,

    min subject to ,K L

    rK wL f K L Q

    24

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    25/36

    Doubling input prices simply doubles the total cost:

    When RTS does not change with scale, for anyt> 1, the technology exhibits

    , , , ,IRTS if

    , , , ,CRTS if

    , , , ,DRTS if

    C r w tQ C r w Q

    tQ Q

    C r w tQ C r w Q

    tQ Q

    C r w tQ C r w Q

    tQ Q

    , , , satisfying

    , , , , for all 0

    C r w Q

    C tr tw Q tC r w Q t

    25

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    26/36

    26

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    27/36

    Isoquant the locusofK and Lsuch thatthe output level isconstant

    Bending toward theorigin

    L

    K

    Q =10

    Q =20

    Iso-cost line

    rK+wL= constant

    Optimal input

    mix to produce

    Q=10

    27

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    28/36

    For CRTS technology and in LR equilibrium,we cannot tell the output level of a particularfirm, because every output level will lead tothe same profit (which is zero) given fixed

    input and output prices

    28

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    29/36

    1

    1

    (1 ) 1

    1 1

    ( , )

    When + =1,

    and

    Marginal products depend on the / ratio, not on the absolute scale

    K

    L

    K

    L

    Q f K L K L

    QMP K L

    K

    QMP K LL

    LMP K L

    K

    KMP K LL

    K L

    29

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    30/36

    The technology exhibits CRTS iff + =1.

    2 ,2 2 2 2 2 ( , )f K L K L K L f K L

    What does +=1 mean?

    +>1; IRTS

    +=1; CRTS

    +

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    31/36

    Consider an industry with all firms having thesame CRTS technology: Q= f(K, L); output &input markets perfectly competitive; and firmsmaximizing profits. As a whole, the industry

    employs K* and L*.

    31

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    32/36

    Q1: What is the industrial output? f(K*,L*)

    Let K1, K2, , KNbe the amount employed inthe Nfirms; L1, L2, , LNbe the amount employed.

    Cost minimization requires that K1/L1=K2/L2= =KN/LN=K*/L*=a.

    1 1 2 2

    1 1 2 2

    1 2

    * * *

    * *

    , , ,

    , , ,

    ,1 ,1 ,1 ( CRTS)

    ,1 , ( CRTS)

    ,

    N N

    N N

    N

    f K L f K L f K L

    f aL L f aL L f aL L

    L f a L f a L f a

    L f a f aL L

    f K L

    32

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    33/36

    Q2: What is the marginal product of capital (labor)in each firm?

    Despite possibly different scales, each firmsmarginal product of capital is simply equal to

    f(K*,L*)/K. Similarly, all firms have the same marginal product

    of labor = f(K*,L*)/L .

    33

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    34/36

    Q3: What is the rental rate of capital paid byeach firm? the wage rate of labor paid byeach firm?

    Let pbe the price of the good produced in

    the industry.

    The rental rate of capital is just ,

    .

    the wage rate of labor is just ,

    .

    34

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    35/36

    What do we know about industrial output? simply work out the problem by assuming all

    inputs (K* and L*) are hired by a single firm(which we assume is price taking in both inputand output markets).

    we can understand f(K, L) as an industryproduction function.

    35

  • 7/29/2019 micro for trade.pdf

    36/36

    Takeout: given same CRTS technology & LRcompetitive equilibrium, total K* and L* inthe sector fully describe the output level,as well as the real rental rate and real wage

    rate.