11
Micro-blogging - potential impacts on informal communication and collaborative work Dejin Zhao & Mary Beth Rosson Penn State University dzhao,[email protected]

Micro-blogging - potential impacts on informal communication and collaborative work

  • Upload
    moriah

  • View
    20

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Micro-blogging - potential impacts on informal communication and collaborative work. Dejin Zhao & Mary Beth Rosson Penn State University dzhao,[email protected]. Overview. Micro-blog Anticipated impacts on informal communication Interview study Preliminary findings Discussion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Micro-blogging - potential impacts on informal communication and collaborative workDejin Zhao & Mary Beth RossonPenn State Universitydzhao,[email protected]

  • OverviewMicro-blogAnticipated impacts on informal communicationInterview studyPreliminary findingsDiscussion

  • Micro-bloggingWhat is a micro-blog? A new emerging form of communication, powered by online CMC tools (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Jaiku, Pownce) Allow individuals to broadcast information through brief updatesWith their audience/subscribers (e.g., friends, colleagues, other interested observers) [3].

    Unique communication behaviors: people seem to use micro-blog to share information about themselves that they probably wont do through other communication mediaSmall little things, happening around peoples daily life and work activitiesLive information, e.g., what they are doing, thinking, reading, and experiencingThey believe are interesting and might be valuable to others as well, but just not enough to share through other communication channels (e.g., emails, IMs, or blogs).

    Emotionally, people achieve greater cyberspace presence, out there, and feel one more layer of connection with others and the world [3, 5].

  • Micro-blogging in work settingsPosition: Micro-blog might potential become an important informal communication medium at work, with consequent mediating impacts on collaborative work.

    Problems and needs: Corporate settings need better CMC support of informal communication among employees more than everInformal communication is critical to collaborative work and organization success (e.g., opportunistic valuable information sharing, common ground, connectedness) [7]Less informal communication opportunities, as communication patterns shifts from primarily FTF communication to more online mediated communication (e.g., more work done remotely, time famine, and concerns of interruptions)Computer-mediated informal communication essential as part of this, but still an open research problemE.g., social/visual cues in CMC seems not to help much [8]. Other efforts examining social networking and public displays within organizations

    Two classes of anticipated impacts of micro-blogging:Informational effects: improved opportunistic valuable information sharing and expertise seeking, building and maintaining common groundSocial and emotional effects: enhancing the feeling of connectedness among co-workers.

  • Pilot project: an interview StudyTo investigate the questions of: a) how people micro-blog at work, b) what consequential effects micro-blogging have or might have on collaborative work, and c) how it might be improved?

    Semi-structured interviews with participants (expected 20 people), from a large software R&D Business Unit, with roles of both managers and workers in software engineering, product management, marketing , and sales.

    About the interview questions:Participants are asked about their experiences using Twitter with co-workersProblems and issues encountered, opinions and anticipated feature needs either/or relevant to work. Questions asked from both information sender and receiver perspectiveParticipants asked more generally about their perceptions of micro-blogs, compared with other communication media available

  • Preliminary findings: Consequences of Twitter use

    Opportunistic valuable information sharing: a segment marketing manager once posted about his bad luck of setting demos in a marketing event, others respond similar experiences, and one of the guys organized an further meeting to exchange and learn from each others experiences.

    Work-related info/articles sharing: marketing people often post work related news, product managers post about new features of competitors or other relevant products.

    Common ground building : people replying to a co-workers updates/opinions sometimes are just for alerting him/her that they read it, or agree with the opinions.

    Perceptions of others work: a product manager needs to collaborate with a marketing guy in a new project. By reading their work-related updates in Twitter, he gains insights into how their teams work.

  • Preliminary findings: Technological affordancesBroadcasting and voluntary readingMakes it easier for users to share information that they probably would not do otherwiseFulfill peoples needs of checking others status, reading and responding is not demanded, subscribe based on interests, reply if they find topics interesting or have sth to share

    Simple, easy, and pervasive accessReduce threshold (low cost) to shareUpdate as things happening and thoughts crossing mindsCheck whenever they get a moment (e.g., in-between meetings)

  • Preliminary findings: Issues and problemsPrivacy: some people concerned about broadcasting social or work status to everyone on their follower listSecurity: some people said he might post more client and task sensitive information to an internal micro-blog, and would want to see similar posts from others.Integration: people would like to have a more integrated way to stay in touch with people inside and outside organizatione.g., co-workers, clients and sales partners, other friends in the same industryValue: people sometimes not sure what might be interesting to update for subscribers, especially at start

  • Discussion: future researchAcademia investigation of micro-blogging as a social activityWhat is motivation for micro-blogging (e.g., social emotional needs, individual/culture/background difference factors)?What are its consequential effects (both cognitive and emotional effects in both individual and group levels)What are the technological affordances of communication channel and how do they relate to peoples usage and needs?

    Further investigation of corporate micro-blogging subject to implementation inside the organizations Use and impacts likely also to be affected by the specific organizational settings (e.g., organizational structure, communication structure, organizational culture, nature of work activities, and individual differences)

    In a word, micro-blogging could become a useful medium for supporting informal intra-organization communication across different organizational levels. The nature of status updating might enact a variety of communication needs at workMay impact other organizational issues (e.g., job satisfaction, creativity and innovation, and strategic management).

  • Thank You

  • ReferenceGeyer, W., Dugan, C., DiMicco, J., Millen, D., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). Use and reuse of shared lists as a social content type. In Proc. CHI 2008, Florence, Italy, 1545-1554Jackson, A., Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2007). Corporate blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. In Proc. 40th HICSS, Jan., 2007.Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proc. 13th ACM SIGKDD, August 1215, San Jose, CA.Joinson, A.N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people: motives and use of facebook. In Proc. CHI 2008, Florence, Italy, 1027-1036McFedries, P. (2007). Technically speaking: All atwitter. IEEE Spectrum, 44(10), 84.Nardi, B.A., Schiano, D.J. & Gumbrecht, M. (2004). Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? In Proc. CSCW 2004. New York: ACM Press, pp. 222231.Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D. & Daly-Jones, W. (1994). Informal Workplace Communication: What is it Like and How Might We Support It? Proceedings of CHI94, 131-137, ACM Press: New York.Whittaker, S. (2003). Theories and Methods in Mediate Communication. In http://www.research.att.com/~stevew/cmc-chapter.doc.pdf

    *I will talk about micro-blogging and its potential impacts on informal communication and collaborative work*Just to give everyone a little bit overview, I will start with micro-blog, and why I think its important to study the impacts on informal communication at work. After that I will talk a little bit about the interview study I am conducting, preliminary findings so far, and at the end, some of my thoughts for us to discuss about.*First, Can I ask people here, how many of you use Twitter?

    Great! I am still working on my interview study, so I may interview some of you after this, I hope you not say no to me .

    I believe most of us here are very familiar with Twitter and Facebook Status Feeds. Though little academia research study about micro-blog, people can found many news and articles talking about twitter and micro-blog on the Internet.

    So what is micro-blog, here is a working definition based on information from Internet and prior relevant research. Micro-blog is emerging form of communication, enable individuals to broadcast information through simple updates to their audience/subscribers (including their friends, colleagues, and other interested observers)

    There are many articles talking about what people twitter about and why they twitter. A unique behavior that I noticed is that, Micro-blog allows users to share information that they probably wont through other communication media, such as small little things happen in peoples daily life. This type of information are often live information, such as what they are doing, reading, thinking, and experiencing, information that they believe are interesting and might also be valuable for others, however they might not bother to share with others through other manners of communication, such as through emails, IM, or weblogs. Emotionally, people seem to use micro-blog to achieve a level of cyberspace presence, being out there and feel another layer of connection with others and the world around their life.*This unique phenomenon makes me think of its potential connection with informal communication at work. And my position here is that Micro-blog might have potential to become an new informal communication medium at work, so as to have mediating impacts on collaborative work.

    Informal communication has been suggested crucial important to collaborative work and organizations success. The water-cooler scenarios showed us that informal information exchange in such impromptu conversations plays an important role for collaborative work among knowledge co-workers and enhancing creativity and innovation for organizations that rely on knowledge economy.

    Communication patterns have shifted from primarily face-to-face communication to more online communication in IM, emails, and other CMC tools; As more and more collaboration can be done remotely through CMC support, there are relatively less opportunities for face-to-face informal conversations. As more and more of us suffer from time-famine, people become more concerned of interruptions along with convenience brought by IMs and Emails. We need better CMC supports of informal communication more than ever, but this is still an open research problem. Adding social/visual cues in CMC seems not to help much. Other recent efforts including social networking and public displays within organizations.

    At the same time, the popular behaviors of sharing whereabouts and status updates in micro-blogs shows micro-blogs potentials to support mediated informal communication and keeping in touch among co-workers. Two classes of anticipated impacts are informational effects including increased opportunistic valuable information sharing, expertise realizing, building and maintaining common ground; social and emotional effects is mainly enhancing the feeling of connectedness among co-workers. *I am conducting an interview study to investigate the questions of a) how people micro-blog at work, b) what consequential effects micro-blogging have or might have on collaborative work, and c) how it might be improved?

    A semi-structured interview study is designed to interview about 20 people from who twitter with co-workers. The participants are selected from a large software R&D business unit including managers and workers in software engineering, product management, marketing , and sales group.

    Participants are asked about their experiences of using Twitter with co-worker, problems and issues encountered, opinions and anticipated feature needed either/or relevant to work. Questions were asked from both information sender and receiver perspectives. Participants are also asked more generally about their perceptions of micro-blogs, compared with other communication media available.*We found that micro-blogging helps opportunistic valuable information sharing and prompting further informal conversations among co-workers. A segment marketing manager said that he once posted a tweet about his bad luck of setting a demo in a marketing event, that he would rather not to bother to send through email or IMs to co-workers, later on he get responds from co-workers in remote sites with similar experiences, and one of the guys even initiated an further conference call to learn from each others experiences.

    Other findings include that Micro-blogs help to share work-related information and expertise. Marketing people often post work related news, product managers post a lot about new features and products of their competitors.

    Common ground building : some people said that they reply to a co-workers updates/opinions sometimes are just for alerting him/her that they have read it, or agree with them in some extent.

    Micro-blog also helps develop peoples perceptions of others work: a product manager said that he had a project needs to collaborate with a marketing team that he didnt have experience about before. By reading their work-related updates in Twitter, he gains insights into how their teams work.*Here are some preliminary findings of technological affordances. Some of them are consistent with prior research in blogs.

    The nature of broadcasting and voluntary reading in micro-blog makes it easier for users to broadcast information about themselves that they probably wouldnt do otherwise. This technology affordance also fulfill peoples needs of checking others status. Their reading and responding is not demanded, people choose to subscribe based on their interests, and reply if they find topics interesting or have something to share.

    Another important characteristic of Twitter is that it is simple, easy, and pervasive. These features help reduce peoples threshed to share information, allow them to update as things happening and ideas and thoughts crossing their minds. It also make the communication easy to manage. Some people said they usually check on others updates whenever they get a moment, such as in-between meetings, but not necessarily interrupt their current work tasks.*Some issues and problems are also found valuable to technology improvement.

    Privacy issue: some people concerned about broadcasting social or work status to everyone on their follower list, sometimes they would prefer to update different updates to different groups. Security issue: due to twitter is a public service, some people said they would like to post more client and task sensitive information to an internal micro-blog, and would want to see similar posts from others.Integration issue: people expressed that even if there is an internal secure micro-blog tool, they would also like a more integrated way to stay in touch with people inside and outside organization e.g., co-workers inside the organization, clients and sales partners, other friends in the same industry outside the organizationFinally, people sometimes not sure what might be interesting to update for their subscribers, especially at start

    *Here are some of my thoughts about future research work

    We still lack of academia investigation of Micro-blogging as a social activity: we still know little about a) motivation of micro-blogging (e.g., social emotional needs, individual/culture/background difference factors), b) we still know little about its consequential effects (both cognitive and emotional effects in both individual and group levels). We want to understand more about what are the technological affordances of this communication channel and how they relate to peoples usage and needs?

    Further investigation of corporate micro-blogging is still subject to actual implementation inside the organizations. Its use and impacts will be dramatically affected by the specific organizational settings (e.g., organizational structure and culture, nature of work activities, and job and individual differences)

    In a word, micro-blog could potentially become a useful medium for employee communication across various organizational levels. The nature of status broadcasting might enact a variety of communication needs at work. I believe that its potential adoption in corporate will have critical impacts on various organizational issues (e.g., job satisfaction, creativity and innovation, and strategic management).

    **