8
Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report 69 Few recommendations for sewing on reducing none value added operations Style: Long Sleeve Shirt Buyer: M & S Unite:1/C Line:02(Make Section) Collar Bottom Cut & Nose Shape Collar Bottom Cut & Nose Shape Process Name Existing Cycle Time In Min Man powe r Target Process Name Existing Cycle Time In Min Man power Target Collar band join Undefined 1 Collar band join Undefined 1 Collar band cut 0.22 1 272 Collar band cut & collar band shape 0.25 1 240 Collar band shape 0.23 1 260 Total 0.43 3 139 Total 0.25 2 240 Old Target 260 New Target 240 Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.18 Above proposed method is eliminating one non value-added operation from the process by removing the hand scissoring of the collar band. Removal of this non value added operation has no input to the quality of the product either. Existing Method Proposed Method One helpers is collar nose shape cut & other one turn collar band One helper collar nose shape cut & turn

Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

69

Few recommendations for sewing on reducing none value added

operations

Style: Long Sleeve Shirt Buyer: M & S

Unite:1/C Line:02(Make Section)

Collar Bottom Cut & Nose Shape Collar Bottom Cut & Nose Shape

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

powe

r

Target Process

Name

Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

power

Target

Collar band

join

Undefined 1 Collar band

join

Undefined 1

Collar band cut 0.22 1 272 Collar band

cut &

collar band

shape

0.25

1

240 Collar band

shape

0.23 1 260

Total 0.43 3 139 Total 0.25 2 240

Old Target 260 New Target 240

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.18

Above proposed method is eliminating one non value-added operation from the process by

removing the hand scissoring of the collar band. Removal of this non value added operation

has no input to the quality of the product either.

Existing Method Proposed Method

One helpers is collar nose shape cut & other

one turn collar band One helper collar nose shape cut & turn

Page 2: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

70

Style: Buyer:

Unite:1/B Line:02

Front Pkt Folding by Two(2) Ironmen Front Pkt Folding by One(1) Ironman

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

powe

r

Target Process

Name

Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

power

Target

Pkt hem

folding

0.32 1 187

Pkt folding

0.53

1

113

Pkt folding 0.58 1 103

Total 0.90 2 66 Total 0.53 1 113

Old Target 103 New Target 113

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.37

Production is using two ironing operators to fold / press pocket hem and fold /press pocket.

This is a waste of capacity as one operator has the capacity to do both at a time. Proposed

method is to do both operations by one ironing operator. This method can be applied to all the

lines where the pocket ironing is required.

Existing Method Proposed Method

One ironman pocket hem ruling & other

pocket ruling

One ironman using for pocket folding

Page 3: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

71

Style: Long Sleeve Shirt Buyer: GEORGE

Unite:2/B Line:02

Front Pkt Folding with False Stitch Front Pkt Folding without False Stitch

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

power

Target Process

Name

Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

power

Target

Pkt false stitch 0.33 1 180

Pkt folding

0.85

1

71 Pkt iron 0.60 1 100

Total 0.93 2 66 Total 0.58 1 71

Old Target 100 New Target 71

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.37

Production is using two machine operator to set a run stich on the pocket to make it easy for

ironing / pressing and use total of two ironing operators for the pocket press and two machine

operators for attaching the pocket. With the introduction of new method, it has been possible to

remove the run stich operators (2) and get the same line target required with ironing without

run stich.

Existing Method Proposed Method

Pocket false stitch & folding by using two

manpower.

Pocket folding by using one iron man

Page 4: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

72

Inside Collar end after collar make using two manual cut marks while it has already

been cut by the overlook machine to make the smooth shape of collar. Without cut mark and

with cut mark process has been evaluated and as there is no effect to the quality, the helper

who put the cut mark was removed.

Style:5818 Buyer: M & S

Unite:1/C Line:(Male Section)

Before collar topstitch inside selvage cut by using

one helper t Pkt Folding with False Stitch

Collar topstitch without selvage cut Pkt Folding

without False Stitch

Process Name Existing

Cycle

Time In

Min

Man

power

Target Process Name Existing

Cycle

Time In

Min

Man

power

Target

Collar selvage cut 0.07 1 900 Collar selvage

cut

0.10 1 600

Collar cut mark 0.10 1 600 Collar topstitch 0.43 1 139

Collar top stitch 0.36 1 166

Total 0.53 3 109 Total 0.48 2 125

Old Target 109 New Target 125

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.07

Existing Method Proposed Method

Before collar topstitch inside selvage cut by

using one helper

Collar topstitch without selvage cut

Page 5: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

73

During observation we have found that in some process though there are two workers engaged

the work load is only for one. At above operation one helper can turn 240 pcs of cuffs and Line

target is 100 (per line). Line has used two helper for the same.

Style:AW142BDLS Buyer: PVH

Unite:1(anowara) Line:02

Cuff Turn in double manpower Cuff turn single manpower

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

powe

r

Target Process

Name

Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Manpo

wer

Target

Cuff turn 0.25 1 240

Cuff turn

0.22

1

277 Cuff turn 0.40 1 150

Total 0.65 2 92 Total 0.22 1 277

Old Target 150 New Target 277

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.43

Existing Method Proposed Method

Cuff Turn in double manpower Cuff turn single manpower

Page 6: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

74

Here the topstitching operator has been balanced to remove the sticker & reattached and

released the sticker removing helper. Other side sticker removed by the collar bottom cutting

machine.

Style:VH-535WPTLS Buyer: M & S

Unite:1/A Line: Make Section

Sticker remove of collar & reattached by helper Sticker remove of collar & reattached by helper

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Man

powe

r

Target Process

Name

Existing

Cycle

Time In

Min

Man

power

Target

Sticker remove 0.15 1 400

Collar top

stitch

0.33 1 181 Collar top

stitch

0.43 1 139

Collar bottom

cut

0.06 1 1000 Collar bottom

cut

0.06 1 1000

Total 0.54 3 111 Total 0.49 1 122

Old Target 181 New Target 139

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.05

Existing Method Proposed Method

Operator

stitching &

Sticker

Replace

One helper use for sticker remove & reattached

on top of collar

Sticker removing helper reduced by balancing

the work

Page 7: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

75

Remove a nonvalue added activity of marking and attaching by replacing it with a cut mark

from the cutting section (left part) and finish cut with both part adjust & cut. As a result no

need of marking and that time is saved.

Style: Isabella Buyer: H & M

Unite:2/B Line:04

Front neck mark & fitting Front neck fitting without mark

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Manp

ower

Target Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Manpow

er

Target

Neck Mark 0.23 1 257

Neck Fitting

0.53

1

113 Neck Fitting 0.22 1 277

Total 0.45 2 Total 0.53 1 113

Old Target 103 New Target 113

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.37

Existing Method Proposed Method

Front part mark & fitting Both part adjust & fitting

Page 8: Method Study Observation-(LGC)

Productivity Improvement Project- Diagnostic Study Report

76

After collar bottom cut & before collar band join remove the false stitch which is a nonvalue

added operation and there is no effect on quality.

Style: Long Sleeve Shirt Buyer: GRORGE

Unite:02/B Line:02

Collar false stitch Without collar false stitch

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Manpower Tar

get

Process Name Existing

Cycle Time

In Min

Manpow

er

Target

Pkt False Stitch 0.33 1 187

Pkt Folding

.53

1

113 Pkt Iron 0.60 1 103

Total 0.93 2 66 Total .53 1 113

Old Target 103 New Target 113

Saving Manpower 01 Saving Existing Cycle Time 0.37

Existing Method Proposed Method

False stitch & collar band join Without false stitch & band join