1
842 to his employers and to the public, "the opinions of Mr, Charles Robert Bree and other highly-gifted and distinguished mem- bers of the medical profession;" but Mr. Bree, being the only person named—he be- ing the head and front of this noble phalanx -stands amenable to his profession for the aid he has thus rendered to Dr. Kay, and to those who, like Dr. Kay, would not only trample under foot all that is most honoura- ble in the profession, but would, also, con- vert its members into the supple tools of a detestable tyranny ! I am, Sir, yours, very respectfully, J. BEDINGFIELD. August 23,1837, Medical School, Stowmarket. J. BEDINGFIELD. MEDICAL ETIQUETTE AND PRAC- TICE AT LIVERPOOL. Dr. O’I)ONNELI. presents his compliments to the Editor of THE LANCET, and begs his insertion of the following statement :- On Monday, the 31st of July, Mr. A., a gentleman, 45 years of age, was attacked with complete retention of urine. He sent for Dr. U’Donnell, who promised to attend him as soon as he had dined, but neglected to do so. In the course of the evening’, Dr. S-y and Dr. Macrorie were sent for. They attempted to pass instruments, but failed. On the following morning a bougie, it is said, was passed into the bladder. This, on being withdrawn, was followed by a pint, or nearly a pint, of urine. The re- mainder of the day was passed without any further evacuation of the bladder. Wed- nesday passed in the same manner. Thurs- day, Friday, and Saturday the same.. Dur- ing these days various purgative and diure- tic medicines were given, glysters were attempted, the warm bath was used, and three applications of leeches, in parcels of 18, 18 and 12, were made to the abdomen, but no attempts were made to pass any in- struments into the bladder. On Saturday, in the afternoon, Dr. O’Donnell was again sent for ; he found the patient, Mr. A., in a very distressed situation. The bladder was so distended as to fill up the whole of the lower abdomen, on all sides, and to reach up as high as the navel. He was tossing about, covered with perspiration, and complaining of pain in his back, and all over his belly. His pulse was 130; his tougue dry, with a broad brown streak down the centre. Ca- theterism was tried, and failed. Dr. O’Don- nell now told the patient that his bladder was full of urine, and could only be re- lieved by puncture, and that no time was to be lost ; that he (Dr. U’D-ounell) would not meet Dr. Macrorie, and, therefore, that the best thiug that Mr. A. could do would be to send for Mr. Manifold, or some other operating surgeon, who would at once see the necessity of acting. Dr. O’Donnell called on Mr. Manifold, in the course of the evening, to know if he had seen the patient, and what had been done. Mr. Manifold then informed Dr. O’Donnell that the patient was extremely distressed that he, Dr. 0’DonneU, would not attend him ; upon which Dr. O’Donnell stated that he had no objection to attend the patient, but that he would have nothing whatever to do with Dr. Macrorie. Shortly after, Dr. O’D. and Mr. M. met at the patient’s house, when it was stated to the patient that Mr. M. was willing to meet any of the parties in attendance, but that Dr. O’D. would not. The patient then declared that he had no wish whatever to have Dr. Macrorie, and that he had never had any wish to have any person but Dr, O’D., if he would attend to him. About this time the patient had a severe rigor. The bladder was punctured, and 56 ounces of urine drawn off. This urine, on being allowed to cool, deposited a large quantity of mucus, and was, on the following day, extremely putrid and offensive. In the course of the night the urinary fever sub. sided, and, on the following day, the tongue was clean, and the pulse at 70. The opera- tion was scarcely terminated, before Dr- Macrorie arrived; he complained that he had been extremely ill-used, &c., &c. He stated that he had long known that it would be necessary to puncture the bladder, but had deferred doing so, hoping to succeed by other means. Since this time, now sixteen days ago, the bladder has been punctured four times, and each time a large quantity of urine, mixed with mucus, taken away. Leeches have been applied to the anus and perineum, warm hip baths, opiate and febri- fuge medicines, exhibited. It has sinee, Dr. O’D. hears, been stated by Dr. Macro- rie, that he has been extremely ill used, and that the practice pursued was extremely unskilful, and that there was no necessity whatever to puncture the bladder; that if the patient should die, an inquest would be held ; and that if he should recover, Dr. O’Donnell should be brought before the Me- dical Association. This short statement is put forth to ghe Dr. M. an opportunity of reconciling the difference in his own statements, and justi- fying his practice.

MEDICAL ETIQUETTE AND PRACTICE AT LIVERPOOL

  • Upload
    hanhan

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MEDICAL ETIQUETTE AND PRACTICE AT LIVERPOOL

842

to his employers and to the public, "theopinions of Mr, Charles Robert Bree andother highly-gifted and distinguished mem-bers of the medical profession;" but Mr.Bree, being the only person named—he be-ing the head and front of this noble phalanx-stands amenable to his profession for theaid he has thus rendered to Dr. Kay, and tothose who, like Dr. Kay, would not onlytrample under foot all that is most honoura-ble in the profession, but would, also, con-vert its members into the supple tools of adetestable tyranny !

I am, Sir, yours, very respectfully,- J. BEDINGFIELD.

August 23,1837,Medical School, Stowmarket.

J. BEDINGFIELD.

MEDICAL ETIQUETTE AND PRAC-

TICE AT LIVERPOOL.

Dr. O’I)ONNELI. presents his complimentsto the Editor of THE LANCET, and begs hisinsertion of the following statement :-On Monday, the 31st of July, Mr. A., a

gentleman, 45 years of age, was attackedwith complete retention of urine. He sentfor Dr. U’Donnell, who promised to attendhim as soon as he had dined, but neglectedto do so. In the course of the evening’, Dr.S-y and Dr. Macrorie were sent for.They attempted to pass instruments, butfailed. On the following morning a bougie,it is said, was passed into the bladder. This,on being withdrawn, was followed by apint, or nearly a pint, of urine. The re-

mainder of the day was passed without anyfurther evacuation of the bladder. Wed-

nesday passed in the same manner. Thurs-day, Friday, and Saturday the same.. Dur-ing these days various purgative and diure-tic medicines were given, glysters wereattempted, the warm bath was used, andthree applications of leeches, in parcels of18, 18 and 12, were made to the abdomen,but no attempts were made to pass any in-struments into the bladder. On Saturday, inthe afternoon, Dr. O’Donnell was again sentfor ; he found the patient, Mr. A., in a verydistressed situation. The bladder was sodistended as to fill up the whole of the lowerabdomen, on all sides, and to reach up ashigh as the navel. He was tossing about,covered with perspiration, and complainingof pain in his back, and all over his belly.His pulse was 130; his tougue dry, with abroad brown streak down the centre. Ca-theterism was tried, and failed. Dr. O’Don-nell now told the patient that his bladderwas full of urine, and could only be re-lieved by puncture, and that no time was

to be lost ; that he (Dr. U’D-ounell) wouldnot meet Dr. Macrorie, and, therefore,that the best thiug that Mr. A. could dowould be to send for Mr. Manifold, or

some other operating surgeon, who would atonce see the necessity of acting. Dr.O’Donnell called on Mr. Manifold, in thecourse of the evening, to know if he hadseen the patient, and what had been done.Mr. Manifold then informed Dr. O’Donnellthat the patient was extremely distressedthat he, Dr. 0’DonneU, would not attendhim ; upon which Dr. O’Donnell stated thathe had no objection to attend the patient,but that he would have nothing whatever todo with Dr. Macrorie.

Shortly after, Dr. O’D. and Mr. M. metat the patient’s house, when it was statedto the patient that Mr. M. was willing tomeet any of the parties in attendance, butthat Dr. O’D. would not. The patient thendeclared that he had no wish whatever tohave Dr. Macrorie, and that he had neverhad any wish to have any person but Dr,O’D., if he would attend to him. Aboutthis time the patient had a severe rigor.The bladder was punctured, and 56 ouncesof urine drawn off. This urine, on beingallowed to cool, deposited a large quantityof mucus, and was, on the following day,extremely putrid and offensive. In thecourse of the night the urinary fever sub.sided, and, on the following day, the tonguewas clean, and the pulse at 70. The opera-tion was scarcely terminated, before Dr-Macrorie arrived; he complained that hehad been extremely ill-used, &c., &c. Hestated that he had long known that it wouldbe necessary to puncture the bladder, buthad deferred doing so, hoping to succeed byother means. Since this time, now sixteendays ago, the bladder has been puncturedfour times, and each time a large quantityof urine, mixed with mucus, taken away.Leeches have been applied to the anus andperineum, warm hip baths, opiate and febri-fuge medicines, exhibited. It has sinee,Dr. O’D. hears, been stated by Dr. Macro-rie, that he has been extremely ill used, andthat the practice pursued was extremelyunskilful, and that there was no necessitywhatever to puncture the bladder; that ifthe patient should die, an inquest would beheld ; and that if he should recover, Dr.O’Donnell should be brought before the Me-dical Association.

This short statement is put forth to gheDr. M. an opportunity of reconciling the

difference in his own statements, and justi-fying his practice.